universiti putra malaysia adsorption properties of...
TRANSCRIPT
UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA
ADSORPTION PROPERTIES OF MALAYSIAN ACTIVATED CARBON
FOR USE IN SOLAR REFRIGERATOR
NYEIN CHAN WIN @ MOHD. ALI
FSAS 2002 32
ADSORPTION PROPERTIES OF MALAYSIAN ACTIVATED CARBON FOR USE IN SOLAR REFRIGERATOR
By
NYEIN CHAN WIN
@ l\10HD. ALI
Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, In Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science
August 2002
Abstract of thesis submitted to the Senate of Universiti Putra Malaysia in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of M aster of Science
PROPERTIES OF MALAYSIAN ACTIVATED CARBON USE IN SOLAR ADSORPTION REFRIGERATOR
By
NYEIN CHAN WIN @ MOHO. ALI
August 2002
Chairman: Professor Mohd. Yusof Sulaiman, Ph.D.
Faculty: Science and Environmental Studies
Detail experiments and analyses have been made on the solar refrigerator
using activated charcoal and methanol adsorption cycle. A test rig was designed to
study adsorption and desorption capability of activated carbon. A comparison has
been made between adsorbability of six Malaysian commercial activated carbons. To
improve the adsorbability of the carbon a simple method was tested.
Base on Dubinin equation, some them10dynamic properties of adsorbent!
adsorbate necessary for refrigeration calculation had been obtained. In this
experiment methanol is used as the refrigerant medium. The amollnt of methanol
adsorbed by the activated carbon was measured as a function of temperature of the
activated carbon. During the experiment, the temperature of the unadsorbed
methanol was kept constant. From Dubinin-Astakhov equation, parameters of
adsorption data were determined using graphical analysis. A Claperyon P-T-X
(pressure, temperature and concentration) diagram was then constructed.
\I
The Coefficient of Perfonnance (COP) of the activated carbon was then
calculated as a function of maximum collector temperature for different condenser
and evaporator temperatures. From these results of the Coefficient of Perfonnance of
ideal adsorption refrigeration cycles applicable in solar heated adsorption
refrigerators are calculated. The results of the COP calculation for collector
temperature of 1 00°C, condenser temperature 30°C and evaporator temperature of -
1 0°C are as follows:
Activated 2030 4050 5060 6070 7080 5060(4x8)
carbon Type
COP 0.2566 0.2494 0.2563 0 .2656 0.2768 0 .2535
iii
Abstrak tesis yang dikemukakan kepada Senat Universiti Putra Malaysia sebagai memenuhi keperluan untuk ijazah Master Sains
SIFAT-SIFAT BUATAN MALAYSIA KARBON TERAKTIF BAG I PENJERAPAN SURIA KE A TUS PETI SEJUK
Oleh
NYEIN CHAN \VIN @ MOHO. ALI
Ogos 2002
Pengerusi: Profesor Mohd. Yusof Sulaiman, Ph.D.
Fakulti: Sains dan Pengajian Alam Sekitar
Ujikaji terperinci dan analisis telah dilaksanakan ke atas alat penyej uk yang
menggunakan kitar penjerapan karbon teraktif dan nletanol . Suatu rig nlcngujian
telah direka bentuk untuk mengkaji kebolehan karbon teraktif menjerap dan
menyahjerap. Perbandingan telah dibuat terhadap sifat penjerapan enam j enis karbon
teraktif komersial buatan Malaysia. Untuk memperbaiki sifat penjerapan karbon,
suatu kaedah mudah telah diuji.
Berpandukan ke atas persamaan Dubinin, beberapa sifat tem10dinamik
penjerap bahan terjerap yang diperlukan untuk pengiraan penyejukan telah
diperolehi. Dalam ujikaji ini metanol digunakan sebagai media pendingin . Amaun
metanol yang dijerap oleh karbon terakdit telah diukur terhdap perubahan suhu
karbon teraktif. Semasa ujikaji, suhu metanol yang tak terserap ditctapkan. Dari
persamaan Dubinin-Astakhov, parameter data penjerapan ditentukan menggunakan
analisis grad. Rajih Claperyon P-T-X (tekanan, suhu dan depadatan) kemudiannya
dibentuk.
IV
Pekali prestasi (COP) karbon teraktif dikira menurut fungsi suhu pengumpul
untuk suhu kondenser dan penyejat yan berbeza. Dari hasil pengiraan ini pre stasi
kitar penyejuk penjerapan unggul yang terpakai kepada alat penyenjuk penjerapan
yang padankyu menggunakan teuga suria dapat dikira. Hasil pengiraan COP untuk
suhu pengumpul 1 00 DC, suhu kondenser 30 DC dan suhu dan penyerat -1 0 DC adalah
seperti berikut.
Jensi karbon 2030 4050 5060 6070 7080 5060(4x8)
teraktif
COP 0.2566 0.2494 0.2563 0 .2656 0.2768 0 .2535
v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to express my full thanks and sincere gratitude to Professor Dr.
Mohd. Yusof Sulaiman, chairman of my supervisory committee, for his valuable
suggestion, constructive criticism, patient guidance and repeated encouragement
throughout this work.
Similar thanks must go to Dr. Mahdi Abd W.ahab, Dr. Azmi Zakaria and
Associate Professor Dr. Zainal Abidin Sulaiman for serving as committee members,
taking interest in and offering helpful criticism and guidance throughout the research.
Thanks are also to the members and staffs in the Department of Physics who
have always willing to offer assistance and advice, in particular, En. Shaharuddin Hj .
Abd Rahman and En. Razak Haroun.
vi
I certify that an Examination Committee met on 1 ih August 2002 to conduct the final examination of Nyein Chan Win @ Mohd. Ali on his Master of Science thesis entitled "Adsorption Properties of Malaysian Activated Carbon for Use in Solar Refrigerator" in accordance with Universiti Pertanian Malaysia (Higher Degree) Act 1 980 and Universiti Pertanian Malaysia (Higher Degree) Regulations 1 98 1 . The Committee recommends that the candidate be awarded the relevant degree. Members of the Examination Committee are as follow:
ZAINAL ABIDIN T ALIB Associate Professor, Faculty of Science and Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia (Chairman)
!\lOHD. YUSOF SULAIMAN Professor, Faculty of Science and Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia (Member)
ZAINAL ABIDIN SULAIMAN Associate Professor, Faculty of Science and Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia (Member)
AZMI ZAKARlA, Ph.D. Faculty of Science and Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia (Member)
HAMSHER MOHAMAD RAMADILI, Ph.D. Professor/Deputy Dean School of Graduate Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia
Date: 9 8 0:'::: 2D02
Vll
This thesis submitted to the Senate ofUni"ersiti Putra Malaysia has been accepted as fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master Science. The members of the Supervisory Committee as follow:
MOHD. YUSOF SULAIMAN Professor, Faculty of Science and Environmental Studies
Universiti Putra Malaysia (Chainnan)
MAHDI ABDUL \V AHAB, Ph.D Faculty of Science and Environmental Studies
Universiti Putra Malaysia (Member)
ZAINAL ABIDIN SULAIMAN Associate Professor, Faculty of Science and Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia (Member)
AZMI ZAKARIA, Ph.D. Faculty of Science and Environmental Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia (Member)
VHI
AINI IDERIS, Ph.D. Professor/Dean School of Graduate Studies
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Date:
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the thesis is based on my original work except for quotations and citations which have been duly acknowledged. I also declare that it has not been previously or concurrently submitted for any other degree at UPM or other institutions.
IX
� ('·o�: Q • "'\')' \L'�
NYEIN CHAN WIN @ MOHD. ALI
Date: +. 10 . tPOO;)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT ABSTRAK ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS APPROVAL DECLARATION LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
CHAPTER
I INTRODUCTION 1 . 1 Objectives of the Study 1 .2 Limitations of the Study
2 ACTIVATED CARBON 2. 1 Activated Carbon Types 2 . 1 . 1 Properties of the Activated Carbon used 2.2 Choice of the Activated Carbon-Methanol Pair 2 .3 Theory of the System 2.4 Theoretical Consideration of Adsorption 2.4. 1 Adsorption 2.4.2 Adsorption - Isotherms and Isoteres 2 .5 Literature Review 2 .5 . 1 Characterization of Carbons 2 .5 .2 Solid adsorption Solar Power Ice-makers 2 .6 Adsorption Solar Refrigeration 2 .7 Flow Chart of the Steps used in the Project
3 EXPERIMENTAL METHODS 3 . 1 Experimental Rig 3 .2 Experimental Procedure 3 .3 Presentation of the Tested Data 3 .4 Application of Clausius-Claperyon Equation 3 .5 Data Analysis 3 .6 Application of the Solar Adsorption Refrigeration Cycle 3 .6 . 1 Desorption Period (heating periods) 3 .6.2 Adsorption Period (cooling periods) 3 .7 Calculation of the ideal COP and Discussion
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
5 CONCLUSION
x
PAGE
11 IV VI Vll IX Xll
XIV XVll
1 8 9
1 1 1 2 1 4 1 4 1 6 1 9 1 9 2 1 24 24 32 35 39
4 1 4 1 43 45 49 5 1 55 55 59 6 1
63
1 08
REFERENCES
VITA
XI
1 1 0
1 1 3
LIST OF TABLES
Tables Page
2. 1 Values of the Parameters in D-A Equation 30
2 .2 Values ofWo and D in the D-R Equation for the Carbons Tested 30
3 . 1 Affinity Coefficient f3 for some vapors and gases on activated carbon 48
4. 1 Adsorption data of activated carbon type 2030 (8x30) 70
4.2 Adsorption data of activated carbon type 4050 (8x30) 7 1
4.3 Adsorption data of activated carbon type 5060 (8x30) 72
4.4 Adsorption data of activated carbon type 6070 (8x30) 73
4.5 Adsorption data of activated carbon type 7080 (8x30) 74
4.6 Adsorption data of activated carbon type 5060 (4x8) 75
4.7 Derive adsorption properties of activated carbon type 2030 (8x30) 76
4 .8 Derive adsorption properties of activated carbon type 4050 (8x30) 77
4.9 Derive adsorption properties of activated carbon type 5060 (8x30) 78
4. 1 0 Derive adsorption properties o f activated carbon type 6070 (8x30) 79
4. 1 1 Derive adsorption properties of activated carbon type 7080 (8x30) 80
4. 1 2 Derive adsorption properties of activated carbon type 5060 (4x8) 8 1
4. 1 3 Numerical values o f parameters i n the equation (4.2) 66
4. 1 4 Dubinin-Astakhov data for activated carbon type 2030 (8x30) 85
4. 1 5 Dubinin-Astakhov data for activated carbon type 4050 (8x30) 85
4. 1 6 Dubinin-Astakhov data for activated carbon type 5060 (8x30) 86
4. 1 7 Dubinin-Astakhov data for activated carbon type 6070 (8x30) 86
4. 1 8 Dubinin-Astakhov data for activated carbon type 7080 (8x30) 87
XII
4. 1 9 Dubinin-Astakhov data for activated carbon type 5060 (4x8) 87
4.20 Coefficient ofPerfonnances (COPs) for six types of activated carbons 94
4.2 1 Coefficient ofPerfonnances (COPs) for six types of activated carbons 94
4.22 Coefficient of Perfonnances (COPs) for six types of activated carbons 95
4.23 Coefficient ofPerfonnances (COPs) for six types of activated carbons 95
4.24 Coefficient of Perfonnances (COPs) for six types of activated carbons 96
4.25 Coefficient of Perfonnances (COPs) for six types of activated carbons 96
4.26 Coefficient of Perfonnances (COPs) for six types of activated carbons 97
4.27 Coefficient of Perfonnances (COPs) for six types of activated carbons 97
xiii
Figures
2 . 1
2 .2 .a
2 .2.b
2 .3
2 .4
2 .5
2 .6
2 .7
3 . 1
3 .2
4. 1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4 .8
4 .9
LIST OF THE FIGURES
Adsorption cycle on a Ln P vs - l iT plot
A typical complete adsorption isothenn
Types of adsorption isothenns for vapors
The straight line plot of the characteristic curve W= Wo exp (-D ( Tin Ps / P ) n
Page
1 8
23
23
27
A typical diagram depicting the 2 part structure of the characteristic curve W= WoJ exp (-DJ (T In Ps / P ) n + Wo2 exp (-D2 ( Tin Ps / P ) n 27
Deviations from linear D-R plots
Schematic diagram of a simple solar adsorption cycle
Comparison of COP between Activated Carbon-Methanol pair and Zeolite -water pair by Grenier 1 983
Schematic diagram of the experimental setup
The ideal adsorption cycle
D-R representation of activated carbon 2030 (8x30)
D-R representation of activated carbon 4050 (8x30)
D-R representation of activated carbon 5060 (8x30)
D-R representation of activated carbon 6070 (8x30)
D-R representation of activated carbon 7080 (8x30)
D-R representation of activated carbon 5060 (4x8)
Dubinin-Astakhov representation of activated charcoal 2030 (n= 1 . 1 76)
Dubinin-Astakhov representation of activated charcoal 4050 (n= 1 .638)
Dubinin-Astakhov representation of activated charcoal 5060
xiv
28
38
38
42
58
82
82
83
83
84
84
88
88
(n=1 . 1 70) 89
4. 1 0 Dubinin-Astakhov representation of activated charcoal 6070 (n=1 .230) 89
4. 1 1 Dubinin-Astakhov representation of activated charcoal 7080 (n=1 .265) 90
4. 1 2 Dubinin-Astakhov representation o f activated charcoal 5060(4x8) (n=1 . 1 636) 90
4. 1 3 Claperyon diagram o f activated carbon 2030 (8x30) 9 1
4. 1 4 C1aperyon diagram o f activated carbon 4050 (8x30) 9 1
4. 1 5 C1aperyon diagram o f activated carbon 5060 (8x30) 92
4. 1 6 C1aperyon diagram o f activated carbon 6070 (8x30) 92
4. 1 7 C1aperyon diagram of activated carbon 7080 (8x30) 93
4. 1 8 C1aperyon diagram o f activated carbon 5060 (4x8) 93
4. 1 9 COP as a function of maximum collector temperature when Tc=25 °c and Teva= - 1 0 °C 98
4.20 COP as a function of maximum collector temperature when Tc=25 °c and Teva= -5 °C 98
4 .21 COP as a function of maximum collector temperature when Tc=25 °c and Teva= 0 °c 99
4.22 COP as a function of maximum collector temperature when Tc=25 °c and Teva= 5 °c 99
4. 23 COP as a function of maximum collector temperature when Tc=30 °c and Teva=-l 0 °C 1 00
4.24 COP as a function of maximum collector temperature when Tc=30 °c and Teva=-5 °c 1 00
4.25 COP as a function of maximum collector temperature when Tc=30 °c and Teva= 0 °c 1 0 1
4.26 COP as a function of maximum collector temperature when Tc=30 °c and Teva= 5 °c 1 01
4.27 Performance of evaporating temperature of activated carbon 2030 (8x30) at Tc=25 °C 1 02
xv
4.28 Perfonnance of evaporating temperature of activated carbon 4050 (8x30) at Tc=25 °c 1 02
4.29 Perfonnance of evaporating temperature of activated carbon 5060 (8x30) at Tc=25 °c 103
4.30 Perfonnance of evaporating temperature of activated carbon 6070 (8x30) at Tc=25 °c 1 03
4.3 1 Perfonnance of evaporating temperature of activated carbon 7080 (8x30) at Tc=25 °c 104
4.32 Perfonnance of evaporating temperature of activated carbon 5060 (4x8) at Tc=25 °c 1 04
4.33 Perfonnance of evaporating temperature of activated carbon 2030 (8x30) at Tc=30 °c 1 05
4.34 Perfonnance of evaporating temperature of activated carbon 4050 (8x30) at Tc=30 °c 1 05
4.35 Perfonnance of evaporating temperature of activated carbon 5060 (8x30) at Tc=30 °c 106
4.36 Perfonnance of evaporating temperature of activated carbon 6070 (8x30) at Tc=30 °c 1 06
4.37 Perfonnance of evaporating temperature of activated carbon 7080 (8x30) at Tc=30 °c 1 07
4.38 Perfonnance of evaporating temperature of activated carbon 5060 (4x8) at Tc=30 °c 1 07
XVI
LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Abbreviation Unit
COP Coefficient of Performance D-A Dubinin-Astakhov D-R Dubinin-Radushkevich TIM Transparent Insulation Material A Area m2
C Specific heat J/kgK D Parameter in D-R or D-A equations F Function H Enthalpy J L Latent heat of vaporization kJ/kg M Molecular weight kglkmol P Pressure bar Ps Saturation vapor pressure bar Q Heat flow W R Universal gas constant J/kmolK Tc Temperature of the Condenser oK or °c Teva Temperature of the evaporator oK or °c Tm Temperature of methanol oK or °c V Volume m3
W Volume filled by the adsorbate in adsorbent L/kg Wo Maximum volume available for adsorbate in
adsorbent L/kg Xmix Maximum Concentration glgl Xmin Minimum Concentration X Concentration gig
p Density kg/m3
XVll
CHAPTER!
INTRODUCTION
The limited availability of fossil energy carners and the environmental
impact of energy consumption demand mid- and long-term strategies both for the
rational use of energy and for increased renewable energy utilization. Concepts of
renewable energy conversion have been proposed and implemented during recent
decades all over the world and then remarkable potential has been demonstrated.
However, large scales implementation in the context of the requirements above has
not yet taken place.
Unlike non-renewable energy (fossil fuels), the supply of renewable energy
(solar, wind, waves, etc) is 'infinite'. Moreover the net impact of renewable energy
conversion on the environment is considerably lower than the impact of traditional
energy, which is a current concern for the whole world. As a result of the energy
crisis, attention has been focused on the need, not only to conserve conventional
sources of energy, but also to explore non-conventional sources of energy such as
solar radiation, wind, biomass, tides, geothermal sources etc. There is no reason why
these important natural resources should not be exploited for the benefit of the
developing countries, particularly solar radiation, which is relatively abundant in
most places.
During the last few decades, an increasing interest, based on research and
development has been concentrated on utilization of non-conventional energy
sources, namely solar energy, wind energy, tidal waves, biogas, geothermal energy,
hydropower, hydrogen energy, etc. Among these sources, solar energy, which is an
energy source for cooling applications, is a highly popular source due to the
following facts: direct and easy usability, renewable and continuity maintaining the
same quality, being safe, being free, being environment friendly and not being under
the monopoly of anyone.
As a future resel ve of fossil fuel becomes depleted, scientists and engineers
are responsible to develop new technologies to exploit renewable energy resources.
The sun is the major sources of renewable energy on the earth. Solar energy is one of
vital research target in the future. It is hoped that with the further improvements in
this technology, solar energy will supply not only the needs of industry but also the
everyday needs of the population in the rural and remote areas.
Some of the earliest experiments on refrigeration for preservation date back
to the fifth century (Warren, 1 979). Since then, there has been a continuous search
for cheap methods of providing could be for these purposes. At present, the most
common means of producing cold for storage purposes is by the use of vapour
compression units powered by electricity. In rural areas, this method of cold
production is not easily available because of the non-availability of electricity. This
has been affecting their standard of living. Acquisition of the appropriate capability
to produce cold in these areas, therefore, will assist significantly in improving their
standard of living. Four main options may be considered for this purpose (Critoph,
1 990)
2
(i) extension of grid connected electricity to power refrigerators,
(ii) access road for use of on board refrigerated transport,
(iii) use of photovoltaic refrigerators and
(iv) use of heat driven refrigerator or ice-maker.
Options (i) to (iii) above are too expensive to suggest that cold storage will be
available to the areas in most need of them. This leaves the heat driven ice-maker as
the most viable solution to the problem of extending cold to rural areas. The
operation of heat driven refrigerators is either continuous or intermittent. While the
continuous heat driven refrigerator still depends on electricity to power solution
pumps, the intermittent system depends only on heat for operation and does not have
any moving part. Because low-grade heat is required to power the system, it is
possible for locally available heat sources, like solar energy and fossil fuel, to be
used. This makes it very attractive in remote regions without grid connected
electricity.
Cold production using solar energy appears very attractive. This is because
cold is needed most when solar radiation is highest. Also, solar radiation is freely
available and non-polluting. Solar cooling seems to be a very attractive application
for solar energy since more cooling is necessary when more solar energy is available.
Nevertheless, to date, most efforts for promoting solar cooling have failed. Solar
cooling would be a useful technology in areas of the world where there is a demand
for cooling high isolation levels and no firm electricity supply to power conventional
systems. In tropical areCjs, domestic hot water and space heating are not necessities,
but also solar refrigeration could be used for storing agricultural products, food and
3
medicines. The most plomising applications are vaccine storage and food storage
(particularly fish). Several different solar thermal refrigeration have been studied for
some years and many refrigerators were built and tested.
There are two ways to use solar energy to operate refrigerators. The first one
IS to convert solar radiation into heat to run a thermally powered absorption or
adsorption refrigeration system. The second way is to convert solar radiation into
electricity by means of photovoltaic cells to drive a conventional refrigerator.
Photovoltaic converters and compressIOn refrigerators are currently being
developed for small-scale domestic use and for the preservation of vaccines in
isolated areas. Adsorption refrigeration systems with thermal solar collectors enjoy a
wider range of possible applications, which include air-conditioning, medium-scale
cold storage, ice manufacturing, and the same small-scale uses as the photovoltaic
systems.
The whole subject of solar powered refrigeration thus embraces a variety of
solar and refrigeration technologies, all of which are active areas of research and
development at the present time. However, none of the systems developed to date are
economically viable because they are too expensive. Efforts are being made to
improve efficiencies and bring down costs, but there is still little to choose between
the various types, and it is difficult to see which, if any, will ultimately secure
appreciable markets.
4
The direct used of solar energy as thennal power has gathered considerable
interest. Comparing with PV system, the thennal cooling system is low cost, more
maintenance free and the possibility of local production in developing countries. The
simplest fonn of thennal adsorption refrigeration cycle is intennittent which requires
low maintenance. The only complex control action needed is that the power source
cycles from the off to on start. S ince the sun automatically cycle, this complexity is
even removed. It may additional be an advantage in vaccine cooling application that
the collection of the solar energy is necessarily passive, so that the system can be
imagined to function independently of any operator input.
In the field of liquid absorption, ammonia-water and lithium bromide-water
pairs were widely used in experimental units of solar refrigeration (Ward et aI . , 1 979
and Staicovici, 1 986). Different prototypes utilizing saline ammoniac solutions
(Swartman, 1 975) as well as solid absorption reactions (Worsoe-Schmidt, 1 983) have
also been studied. As compared to the above-mentioned devices, solid adsorption
systems show some advantages: the adsorbent is not submitted to any change of
column during the sorption processes, as in solid absorption; it does not need a
rectifying column as in liquid absorption.
Efficient refrigerators based on the adsorption cycle can be perfonned using
only thennal energy. Several experimental developments have proved that adsorptive
refrigeration systems are well adapted to soft technology applications, since they can
operate without moving parts and with low-grade thennal energy from different
sources. Adsorption cooling cycles are a possible response to this problem since they
5
operate with non-toxic refrigerant fluids like water and methanol, which are fully
ecologically compatible.
S ince, adsorption techniques also allow cycling large amounts of refrigerant
fluid, adsorptive refrigerators can be most efficient, and a design of a new ice maker
using the activated carbon-methanol pair and solar regeneration is theoretically
analyzed and its behavior simulated.
Although silica gel has been used in at least one closed cycle refrigerant
system, the best majority of experience is with the zeolites or activated carbons. The
most commonly utilized adsorbents are silica gel, activated carbon, aluminas and
zeolites. Zeolite water and activated carbon-methanol are the most used adsorbent
adsorbate pairs in refrigeration systems. These two pairs have entirely different
physical and chemical properties. Methanol is easily desorbed from activated carbon
when it i s heated, while zeolite, the water is kept much longer.
Thus the activated carbon-methanol pair is best adapted to operating cycles
with small evaporating temperature variation (up to 400 C). Adsorption cycles with
the zeolite water pair need a longer evaporating temperature change (700 C or more)
to operate according to (Meunier and Douss, 1 990) . (Critoph and Vogel, 1 986)
compared zeolites and active charcoal with refrigerants R1 1 , R12 , R22 and R1 14 and
in all cases found charcoal a preferable adsorbent for solar cooling. (Meunier et aI . ,
1 990) have compared synthetic zeolite-water, synthetic zeolite-methanol, and
charcoal-methanol combinations. They find that activated charcoal-methanol gives a
better Coefficient of Performance (COP) generally, but that when the nighttime
6
ambient temperature to evaporating temperature difference is particularly higher then
a zeolite-water combination i s better. However, this will also require a higher
generating temperature to evaporating temperature from the solar collector during the
day. (Meunier, 1 990) comparing AC35-methanol with zeolite 1 3X-water, suggests
that the zeolite combination will only be superior when the temperature lift
(adsorption-evaporation temperature) exceeds 45° C. The COP is based on heat input
to the adsorbent rather than to the solar collector and so the reduced solar collector
efficiency at higher temperatures may actually make charcoal-methanol
combinations superior at even higher temperature lifts. Through the previous work of
others we know that charcoal as adsorbent, methanol as adsorbate is a suitable pair
for solar powered adsorption refrigeration.
There are other reasons for preferring charcoals:
1 . Activated charcoals are cheaper than zeolites.
2. Activated charcoals can be made with properties to suit particular applications.
3 . Activated charcoals (particularly coconut shell charcoal) can be manufactured in
the country of origin.
For these reason it was decided to concentrate on activated charcoal as an adsorbent.
The research report in this dissertation is a study of the activated charcoal
methanol solar thermally powered adsorption refrigeration system, which is
intermitted, taking advantage of the diurnal cycling of the solar source, with a view
to its eventual commercialization in developing countries in Asia. The project
included
7