university and industry collaborations ken leppert attorney microsoft legal and corporate affairs...

16

Upload: egbert-ellis

Post on 13-Jan-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: University And Industry Collaborations Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs
Page 2: University And Industry Collaborations Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs

University And Industry CollaborationsUniversity And Industry Collaborations

Ken Leppert AttorneyMicrosoft Legal and Corporate Affairs

Ken Leppert AttorneyMicrosoft Legal and Corporate Affairs

Page 3: University And Industry Collaborations Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs

GoalsGoals

CollaborationDiscuss modes of collaboration between MSR and academia

Tech Transfer of Software CodeOutline some of concerns of industry with regard to code tech transfer

Identify some challenges for university-to-industry tech transfer of code

Propose some measures universities can take to increase likelihood of successful tech transfer of code

CollaborationDiscuss modes of collaboration between MSR and academia

Tech Transfer of Software CodeOutline some of concerns of industry with regard to code tech transfer

Identify some challenges for university-to-industry tech transfer of code

Propose some measures universities can take to increase likelihood of successful tech transfer of code

Page 4: University And Industry Collaborations Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs

Modes Of CollaborationModes Of Collaboration

Page 5: University And Industry Collaborations Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs

Contrasting Missions And CulturesContrasting Missions And Cultures

Universities Universities

MissionMissionAdvance the state of the Advance the state of the artart

Provide learning Provide learning environment in which environment in which faculty and students can faculty and students can flourishflourish

Enhance reputation in Enhance reputation in the fieldthe field

Culture/EnvironmentCulture/EnvironmentNon-competitive Non-competitive environment environment

Information Information sharing/disseminationsharing/dissemination

Universities Universities

MissionMissionAdvance the state of the Advance the state of the artart

Provide learning Provide learning environment in which environment in which faculty and students can faculty and students can flourishflourish

Enhance reputation in Enhance reputation in the fieldthe field

Culture/EnvironmentCulture/EnvironmentNon-competitive Non-competitive environment environment

Information Information sharing/disseminationsharing/dissemination

IndustryIndustry

MissionMissionDeliver value to the Deliver value to the marketplacemarketplace

Survive and prosper (stay Survive and prosper (stay one step ahead; gain one step ahead; gain market share; make a market share; make a profit)profit)

Culture/EnvironmentCulture/EnvironmentCompetitive landscape Competitive landscape

Requires protection of Requires protection of information in core information in core competenciescompetencies

IndustryIndustry

MissionMissionDeliver value to the Deliver value to the marketplacemarketplace

Survive and prosper (stay Survive and prosper (stay one step ahead; gain one step ahead; gain market share; make a market share; make a profit)profit)

Culture/EnvironmentCulture/EnvironmentCompetitive landscape Competitive landscape

Requires protection of Requires protection of information in core information in core competenciescompetencies

MSRMSR

Page 6: University And Industry Collaborations Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs
Page 7: University And Industry Collaborations Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs

Modes Of CollaborationModes Of Collaboration

Gifts

RFPs

Fellowships, scholarships

Materials available on MSR website

Research platforms/RDKs

Sponsored research

Technical collaboration

Tech transfer

Gifts

RFPs

Fellowships, scholarships

Materials available on MSR website

Research platforms/RDKs

Sponsored research

Technical collaboration

Tech transfer

Page 8: University And Industry Collaborations Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs

Easing Tech Transfer Of Software CodeEasing Tech Transfer Of Software Code

Page 9: University And Industry Collaborations Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs

Tech Transfer Of Software CodeTypical University goalsTech Transfer Of Software CodeTypical University goals

Monetize technological innovation through licensing for a fee Build relationships with industry to bolster teaching and research programs. (E.g.: research collaboration)Increase chances of receiving gifts or sponsored research fundsBolster reputation of university and its faculty in the academic community. (E.g.: “Our code was picked up by XYZ Co.”)

Monetize technological innovation through licensing for a fee Build relationships with industry to bolster teaching and research programs. (E.g.: research collaboration)Increase chances of receiving gifts or sponsored research fundsBolster reputation of university and its faculty in the academic community. (E.g.: “Our code was picked up by XYZ Co.”)

Page 10: University And Industry Collaborations Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs

Tech Transfer Of Software CodeIndustry concernsTech Transfer Of Software CodeIndustry concerns

Potential risks associated with incorporating a third-party component

Software companies very concerned about the origin of any code to be transferred

Potentially devastating effects from incorporating a component subject to

A claim of infringement; Or

Licensing terms that may subject an entire product to a reach-through

Stakes are high: A single problematic component could result in a “stop-ship” (plus the costs of litigation and any damages)

Potential risks associated with incorporating a third-party component

Software companies very concerned about the origin of any code to be transferred

Potentially devastating effects from incorporating a component subject to

A claim of infringement; Or

Licensing terms that may subject an entire product to a reach-through

Stakes are high: A single problematic component could result in a “stop-ship” (plus the costs of litigation and any damages)

Page 11: University And Industry Collaborations Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs

Tech Transfer Of Software CodeTypical problems/challengesTech Transfer Of Software CodeTypical problems/challenges

Sometimes, lack of awareness of IP and licensing issues. Typical issues

Privity of contract with students and other third partiesOrigin of code contributions – “Borrowing” of third-party codeReach-through license terms in copyleft licenses (both inbound and outbound)

ResultIndustry reluctant to assume code.If code is transferred, large overhead to conduct due diligenceSpinoffs/incubated startups valued less by investors after due diligence uncovers dubious code pedigreePotential liability for university

Sometimes, lack of awareness of IP and licensing issues. Typical issues

Privity of contract with students and other third partiesOrigin of code contributions – “Borrowing” of third-party codeReach-through license terms in copyleft licenses (both inbound and outbound)

ResultIndustry reluctant to assume code.If code is transferred, large overhead to conduct due diligenceSpinoffs/incubated startups valued less by investors after due diligence uncovers dubious code pedigreePotential liability for university

Page 12: University And Industry Collaborations Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs

Five Proactive Measures To Promote Tech Transfer Of CodeFive Proactive Measures To Promote Tech Transfer Of Code

Privity of Contract. Make sure everyone involved in a project is under some kind of written agreement so that the university’s ownership is not clouded by uncertainty Development Processes. Implement an organized software development process. E.g.

Code check-in and version control from the beginningTagging code with metadata about origin

Internal Awareness. Build awareness of IP and licensing issues among everyone involved in project.Appropriate Licensing. Employ a licensing model that enables tech transfer Policies. Put in place policies that memorialize best practices for all of the above

Privity of Contract. Make sure everyone involved in a project is under some kind of written agreement so that the university’s ownership is not clouded by uncertainty Development Processes. Implement an organized software development process. E.g.

Code check-in and version control from the beginningTagging code with metadata about origin

Internal Awareness. Build awareness of IP and licensing issues among everyone involved in project.Appropriate Licensing. Employ a licensing model that enables tech transfer Policies. Put in place policies that memorialize best practices for all of the above

Page 13: University And Industry Collaborations Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs

Licensing ModelsLicensing Models

Many licensing models Public Domain – Work has lapsed or been dedicated to the public; no IP protection. Proprietary - An outbound licensing model that typically grants only narrow licenses to end users to use the product and associated IPOpen Source – Many variations; two main types:

“BSD-style” – Broad rights to copy & distribute code; only requirement is attribution; licensee can incorporate BSD-type code into its proprietary code.“Copyleft” – GPL, LGPL, MPL – If you incorporate code covered by a copyleft source license into an existing project, you may be required to grant similar rights to all of your code/IP to all third parties.

What does this mean for tech transfer? Uncertainties surrounding copyleft model may discourage tech transfer, since industry reluctant to touch copyleft source with reach-through terms Possible to be open without use of copyleft license. Use of other open source licensing models like the BSD (or a standard commercial license) is more likely to allow use by industryIllustration

Many licensing models Public Domain – Work has lapsed or been dedicated to the public; no IP protection. Proprietary - An outbound licensing model that typically grants only narrow licenses to end users to use the product and associated IPOpen Source – Many variations; two main types:

“BSD-style” – Broad rights to copy & distribute code; only requirement is attribution; licensee can incorporate BSD-type code into its proprietary code.“Copyleft” – GPL, LGPL, MPL – If you incorporate code covered by a copyleft source license into an existing project, you may be required to grant similar rights to all of your code/IP to all third parties.

What does this mean for tech transfer? Uncertainties surrounding copyleft model may discourage tech transfer, since industry reluctant to touch copyleft source with reach-through terms Possible to be open without use of copyleft license. Use of other open source licensing models like the BSD (or a standard commercial license) is more likely to allow use by industryIllustration

Page 14: University And Industry Collaborations Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs

Comparison Of Some Open Source LicensesComparison Of Some Open Source Licenses

BSD CodeBSD Code

MPL CodeMPL Code

GPL CodeGPL Code

+

+

+

Combined Combined WorkWork

CombinedCombined WorkWork

WorkWork

CombinedCombined

Company not required Company not required to grant any particular to grant any particular license rights.license rights.

““Separate” non-MPL Separate” non-MPL files can be licensed files can be licensed under other terms. under other terms. Company could be Company could be required to apply MPL required to apply MPL terms to any files that terms to any files that contain MPL code. contain MPL code.

Risk that company Risk that company could be required to could be required to license license ENTIREENTIRE work work under the GPL.under the GPL.

CompanyCompany CodeCode

CompanyCompany CodeCode

CompanyCompany CodeCode

Page 15: University And Industry Collaborations Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs

Recap On Licensing Approach Research-Only versus CommercialRecap On Licensing Approach Research-Only versus Commercial

Licensing model should be appropriate for the goals of the project

Research useCopyleft licenses such as GPL may preclude use by industry

Licenses such as BSD pose fewer roadblocks to dissemination to industry

Commercial useMost of the time, a non-exclusive license is sufficient

Broad commercial license; right to sublicense within channel

Irrevocable rights once paid

Background IP covered to the extent use of licensed technology would infringe

No annuities; one-time lump sum payment

Flexibility to ship, or not ship, in products

Some representations and warranties; Not “AS IS”

No copyleft source contamination or other dependencies

Licensing model should be appropriate for the goals of the project

Research useCopyleft licenses such as GPL may preclude use by industry

Licenses such as BSD pose fewer roadblocks to dissemination to industry

Commercial useMost of the time, a non-exclusive license is sufficient

Broad commercial license; right to sublicense within channel

Irrevocable rights once paid

Background IP covered to the extent use of licensed technology would infringe

No annuities; one-time lump sum payment

Flexibility to ship, or not ship, in products

Some representations and warranties; Not “AS IS”

No copyleft source contamination or other dependencies

Page 16: University And Industry Collaborations Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Ken Leppert Attorney Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs

© 2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.This presentation is for informational purposes only. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or implied, in this summary.