university of western sydney uws learning and teaching awards … · 2015-08-19 · • provide a...

University of Western Sydney

UWS Learning and Teaching Awards Nomination Guidelines

for

Citations for Outstanding Contributions to Student Learning

UWS Excellence in Teaching

2015

July 2015 UWS L&T Awards of 12

The University of Western Sydney has established institution wide Learning and Teaching (L&T) Awards. The awards fall under three categories; UWS Citations for Outstanding Contributions to Student Learning, UWS Awards for Excellence in Teaching and the Vice-Chancellor’s Excellence in Teaching Award. The awards scheme recognises and rewards the diverse contributions that individuals and teams make to the quality of student learning at UWS and are designed as a pathway to submissions for citation and award applications at the national level, through the Office for Learning and Teaching (OLT). The Awards are intended to:

a. recognise and reward excellence; b. instil notions of best-practice and excellence in all aspects of work at UWS; c. boost morale and productivity of staff; d. identify and support UWS nominees for other award schemes; e. foster ongoing professional development; f. encourage loyalty and commitment to UWS; and g. provide a platform to showcase staff achievements.

The Awards support the strategic goals of the University and act as a channel for monitoring and celebrating achievement by individuals, groups and teams over the previous one to three year period. In some categories of award some submissions may include summarised background material from longer than three years ago to contextualise the achievements.

There is an expectation that successful candidates will apply for external Office for Learning and Teaching Awards within two years of receiving an award.

The UWS L&T Awards comprise:

Citations for Outstanding Contributions to Student Learning (8) ($2000 for individual winners; $3000 for teams of two; $4000 for teams of three or more) Excellence in Teaching Awards (4) ($3000 for individual winners; $5000 for teams of two; $7000 for teams of three or more) Vice-Chancellor’s Excellence in Teaching Award (1) The Vice-Chancellor's Excellence in Teaching Award winner will be chosen from the pool of four UWS Excellence in Teaching Award winners, recommended by the UWS Awards Panel.

February 2015 UWS L&T Awards of 12

UWS Citation for Outstanding Contributions to Student Learning This award has been established to:

• Recognise and reward achievement, commitment to high quality learning and teaching activities and support by academic and professional staff (technical and administrative).

• Recognise the importance of a whole program approach to curriculum development and delivery.

• Recognise innovations in supporting students outside the classroom. • Support the sharing of good practice. • Strengthen the careers of staff within the University. • Foster on-going professional development. • Assist staff in developing their evidence to apply for VC’s Excellence Awards and external

awards. • Provide a platform to showcase excellence in learning and teaching within the University.

The Citation consists of a grant and recognition award (certificate) that is presented at the annual UWS Learning and Teaching Awards ceremony. Grant money can be used for professional development purposes, to support learning and teaching improvement initiatives or taken as a superannuation or cash payment (after tax and credited through payroll). Eligibility This Award acknowledges the work done by permanent, fixed term, full or part-time and casual academic and professional staff who:

• have been employed at UWS for a minimum of one year; • have made a significant contribution to student learning in a specific area of responsibility;

and • who are widely recognised for their achievements.

Application process

Applications must be made on the forms designated for each Award and available through the UWS Awards and Grants website and submitted to the relevant Dean of School, Head of Unit or equivalent for endorsement before final submission to the Learning and Teaching Unit.

Criteria

Nominees for UWS Citations for Outstanding Contributions to Student Learning are invited to select ONE of the following criteria for assessment, as appropriate for their particular contribution. Nominations will be assessed on evidence provided in relation to the selected


criterion. Previously successful applicants are required to demonstrate progress since the time of the award.

The assessment criteria are:

1 Approaches to teaching and the support of learning that influence, motivate and inspire students to learn. This may include fostering student development by stimulating curiosity and independence in learning; participating in effective and empathetic guidance and advice for students; assisting students from equity and other demographic subgroups to participate and achieve success in their courses; encouraging student engagement through the enthusiasm shown for learning and teaching; inspiring and motivating students through effective communication, presentation and interpersonal skills; enabling others to enhance their approaches to learning and teaching; and developing and/or integrating assessment strategies to enhance student learning.

2 Development of curricula, resources or services that reflect a command of the field. This may include developing and presenting coherent and imaginative resources for student learning; implementing research-led approaches to learning and teaching; demonstrating up-to-date knowledge of the field of study in the design of the curriculum and the creation of resources for learning; communicating clear objectives and expectations for student learning; providing support to those involved in the development of curricula and resources; and contributing professional expertise to enhance curriculum or resources.

3 Evaluation practices that bring about improvements in teaching and learning. Evaluation comprises making judgements about the quality of programs and activities that are part of the academic, cultural and social experience of higher education. This may include showing advanced skills in evaluation and reflective practice; using a variety of evaluation strategies to bring about change; adapting evaluation methods to different contexts and diverse student needs and learning styles; contributing professional expertise to the field of evaluation in order to improve program design and delivery; and the dissemination and embedding of good practice identified through evaluation.

4 Innovation, leadership or scholarship that has influenced and enhanced learning and teaching and/or the student experience. This may include participating in and contributing to professional activities related to learning and teaching; innovations in service and support for students; coordination, management and leadership of courses and student learning; conducting and publishing research related to teaching; demonstrating leadership through activities that have broad influence on the profession; providing innovative learning and teaching for different contexts, including technology enhanced environments, for large and small class sizes and/or to meet the needs of a diverse student cohort; and influencing the overall academic, social and cultural experience of higher education.

In assessing the evidence supporting Early Career nominations, consideration will be given to the career stage of the nominee.

In assessing nominations against the chosen criterion, the Awards Panel will take into account the extent to which nominees show evidence that their contribution has:


a. influenced student learning, student engagement or the overall student experience; b. been sustained over a period of one to three years; and c. gained recognition from fellow staff, the institution, and/or the broader community.

Potential areas of contribution Citations for Outstanding Contributions to Student Learning provide an opportunity for distinctive institutional missions, values and priorities in learning and teaching to be recognised. Citations will be awarded for a wide range of contributions to student learning, both direct and indirect. There are no specified categories for Citations, and awards will be made for both general and more specific contributions. A concise citation will describe the distinctive contribution of the nominee(s). The individual citations are unique and reflect the diversity of ways in which staff contribute to excellent learning and teaching. Listed below (for illustrative purposes only) are examples of possible citations: Academic staff examples: • For excellence in the leadership of a transition program for first year students. • For novel and effective approaches to engaging first-year students in collaborative learning

and peer review in a large class setting. • For the creation of innovative and imaginative resources that engage students in current

disciplinary issues and develop critical thinking skills. • For the introduction of original assessment approaches that recognise the different

learning styles within a diverse student cohort. • For the development of new strategies to ensure effective coordination of teaching in a

cross-school undergraduate program. Sessional academic staff examples: • For sustained support to create a stimulating learning environment in a sessional capacity. • For high quality teaching which demonstrated exceptional achievement as a sessional staff

member. Professional staff examples: • For sustained commitment to personalised administrative support for undergraduate

students that has enhanced the overall student experience. • For specialist expertise in the design and implementation of practical classes leading to

enhanced student engagement.


The criterion/criteria chosen by nominees should be determined by the nature of the nominee’s contribution to student learning. The selection of winners of Citations will be based on the extent to which nominees show evidence that their contribution has:

• influenced student learning, student engagement or the overall student experience; • been sustained over time; and • gained recognition from fellow staff, the institution, and/or the broader community.

NOTE: Staff who have had their contributions to learning recognized through other awards (such as Office of Learning and Teaching (OLT) awards), may not submit nominations based upon the same contributions to student learning for which they have received an award. Essential documentation All nominees for Citations for Outstanding Contributions to Student Learning must provide the following documents:

a. Nomination form (proforma provided);

b. Written statement, including the proposed citation and an argument addressing one or more of the four selection criteria; and

c. Two references.

a. Nomination form

The nomination form reports administrative information, the chosen selection criterion/criteria, and the proposed Citation wording (the latter limited to 25 words). The completed nomination and application must be reviewed and signed by the Dean (or nominee), Unit Head or equivalent (or nominee) before final submission to the Awards and Grants Development Officer in the Learning and Teaching Unit.

b. Written statement The core element of a nomination for a Citation for Outstanding Contributions to Student Learning is a written statement in which the nominees describe their contribution to student learning. It is vital that nominees specifically address one (or more) of the selection criteria, and provide evidence to support their claims against this criterion/criteria. The written statement is limited to four A4 pages in total. Any pages in excess of the four page limit will be removed before being sent to the assessors. It should have four components, presented in this order:

1. The proposed citation (maximum of twenty-five words) describing the distinctive contribution of the nominee.

2. An overview, summarising the particular contribution and describing the specific context for this contribution.


3. A statement addressing the chosen criterion/criteria from among the

following:

• Approaches to teaching and support that influence, motivate and inspire students to learn;

• Development of curricula and resources that reflect a command of the field; • Approaches to assessment and feedback that foster independent learning; • Scholarly or professional activities that have influenced and enhanced learning and

teaching.

4. A statement identifying the ways in which the contribution has influenced student learning, engagement and/or the overall student experience, been sustained over time, and been recognised by fellow staff, the institution, and/or the broader community.

c. References

Two references of no more than one A4 page each, to be provided by people who are able to comment on the nominee’s contribution to student learning against the nominated selection criterion. One of the referees MUST be either the Dean of School (or nominee) or Head of Unit (or nominee). If the nomination is from a team, the references should apply to the team. References over one page will be recopied with only the first page provided to the assessors. Presentation There is no advantage in elaborate presentation of nominations. The first page of the nomination form (provided) is adequate as a cover page. There is no template provided for the written submission but it must be clear and legible. All submissions must adhere to the following: Formatting guidelines: Margins are required to be 2cm on each side of the page with clear paragraph definition Text is required to be 12 point font in either Calibri or Arial. File name: Your surname and UWS LTA and year (One combined PDF) A complete submission will comprise: The nomination form Written statement (four A4 pages max) Two references Submissions should be emailed in PDF format to Dr Susan Mowbray at [email protected] with UWS LTA Application in the subject line.


mailto:[email protected]

UWS Learning and Teaching Awards 2015

Citations for Outstanding Contributions to Student Learning Citation Nomination Form SECTION 1 NOMINEE DETAILS

INDIVIDUAL

Staff Id Number Contact Number

Name (incl title)

Position/ Title Length of Service

School/ Unit

Email Address

TEAM

Team Name

Team Leader

Position / Title School / Unit

Team Members

1. School / Unit

2. School / Unit

3. School / Unit

4. School / Unit

5. School / Unit

6. School / Unit

7. School / Unit

8. School / Unit

(if insufficient space, please attach a list)

SECTION 2 SIGNATURE OF NOMINEE/TEAM LEADER I/We hereby give permission for the University of Western Sydney, to use my/our photograph/s in official University business, including: websites, newsletters, newspapers and promotional material. It is agreed that the use of the photograph/s shall in no way be used in any other forum other than for official University business.

Nominee Name: Signature

OPC Administration Only

Date Received / / 2015 Application No.

Page 1 of 6

SECTION 3 STATEMENT OF SUPPORT –– DVC & VP/ VP/ PVC/ Dean of School /Executive

Director or Director

1. Please state reasons for supporting this nomination

Name:

Position: Dean of School/ Executive Director/ Director/ PVC/ DVC & VP/ VP

(please circle or bold)

Signature:

Page 2 of 6

SECTION 4 SELECTION CRITERIA

Instructions for preparing your nomination:

1. Citation: Please include a 25 word citation describing your distinct contribution to student learning, beginning with “For…”

For

2. Synopsis: The synopsis should be written in the third person and describe the distinctive contribution to student learning and engagement and the resulting impact on students, in a maximum of 75 words.

3. Written statement: The written statement should have the following three components, which must be presented in this order in no more than four pages:

A. A summary/overview of the nominee’s particular contribution and its specific context

B. A statement addressing ONE of the following selection criteria:

Approaches to the support of learning and teaching that influence, motivate and inspire students to

learn. This may include fostering student development by stimulating curiosity and independence in learning; participating in effective and empathetic guidance and advice for students; assisting students from equity and other demographic subgroups to participate and achieve success in their courses; encouraging student engagement through the enthusiasm shown for learning and teaching; inspiring and motivating students through effective communication, presentation and interpersonal skills; enabling other to enhance their approaches to learning and teaching; and developing and/or integrating assessment strategies to enhance student learning.

OR Development of curricula, resources and services that reflect a command of the field. This may include developing and presenting coherent and imaginative resources for student learning; implementing research-led approaches to learning and teaching; demonstrating up-to-date knowledge of the field of study in the design of the curriculum and the creation of resources for learning; communicating clear objectives and expectations for student learning; providing support to those involved in the development of curricula and resources; and contributing professional expertise to enhance curriculum or resources.

OR Evaluation practices that bring about improvements in teaching and learning. Evaluation comprises making judgements about the quality of programs and activities that are part of the academic, cultural and social experience of higher education. This may include showing advanced skills in evaluation and reflective practice; using a variety of evaluation strategies to bring about change; adapting evaluation methods to different contexts and diverse student needs and learning styles; contributing professional expertise to the field of evaluation in order to improve program design and delivery; and the dissemination and embedding of good practice identified through evaluation.

OR Innovation, leadership or scholarship that has influenced and enhanced learning and teaching and/or the student experience. This may include participating in and contributing to professional activities related to learning and teaching; innovations in service and support for students; coordination, management and leadership of courses and student learning; conducting and publishing research related to teaching; demonstrating leadership through activities that have broad influence on the profession; providing innovative learning and teaching for different contexts, including technology enhanced environments, for large and small class sizes and/or to meet the needs of a diverse student cohort; and influencing the overall academic, social and cultural experience of higher education.

Page 3 of 6

C. Conclusion: A statement that addresses how the contribution has:

• influenced student learning, student engagement or the overall student experience; • been sustained over a period of one to three years; and • gained recognition from fellow staff, the institution, and/or the broader community.

(Please note: Supporting documentation is not required for Citation applications; evidence must be summarised and contained within the written statement )

SECTION 5 REFEREE REPORTS

1. Referee report to support nomination

Page 4 of 6

2. Referee report to support this nomination

Page 5 of 6

Please submit your application along with 7 copies to: Manager, HR Support Services Office of People and Culture Building AE Werrington North Campus By close of business Monday 7 September 2015 NOTE: This application will be acknowledged via email by 14 September 2015. If you do not receive acknowledgement, please phone x7890 or email [email protected] .

Page 6 of 6


Excellence in Teaching Awards

This Award supports the work done by UWS academic staff in providing outstanding learning experiences for students. The selection criteria used in this category are identical to those of the Office for Learning and Teaching (OLT) in most cases, successful candidates in this category will be encouraged to apply for external Office for Learning and Teaching Awards.

Eligibility

Currently employed full or part-time academic staff of the University who have worked at UWS for a minimum of one year are eligible for individual nomination, or as leaders of team nominations.

For team nominations, staff who do not satisfy these eligibility criteria, but whose contribution to the Award initiative is to be acknowledged, may be included as members of a team nomination.

Winners of UWS Excellence in Teaching Awards (either individuals or teams) are not eligible for nomination (as an individual or team leader) in the following year. However, previous recipients of highly commended nominations can reapply. These nominations will be required to demonstrate progress from their previous year's submissions. Previous award winners must demonstrate progression since the time of the award.

Note: Staff employed as designated officers with a primary role to establish and implement initiatives and policies in areas relating to the UWS Learning and Teaching Awards would not normally be eligible for individual nomination or as the leader of a team nomination, although their contributions to a team initiative can be acknowledged in team membership.

Criteria

Nominees for UWS Excellence in Teaching awards must address the following four criteria. Nominations will be assessed on evidence provided in relation to the four criteria. Previously successful applicants are required to demonstrate progress since the time of the award.

The following four criteria which will be given equal consideration by the selection panel:

• Approaches to teaching and the support of learning that influence, motivate and inspire students to learn.

• Development of curricula, resources or services that reflect a command of the field.

• Evaluation practices that bring about improvements in teaching and learning.

• Innovation, leadership or scholarship that has influenced and enhanced learning and teaching and/or the student experience.

In assessing nominations against the four criteria, the Panel will take into account the:

February 2015 UWS L&T Awards Page 8 of 12

a. extent to which the claims for excellence are supported by formal and informal evaluation.

b. extent of creativity, imagination or innovation, irrespective of whether the approach involves traditional learning environments or technology-based developments.

c. information contained in references and selected supporting materials submitted by the nominee.

The Award consists of a grant and recognition award (certificate) that is presented at the annual UWS Learning and Teaching Awards ceremony. Grant money can be used for professional development purposes, to support learning and teaching improvement initiatives or taken as a superannuation or cash payment (after tax and credited through payroll). Application process

Applications must be made on the forms designated for each Award and available through the UWS Awards and Grants website and submitted to the relevant Dean of School, Head of Unit or equivalent for endorsement before final submission to the Learning and Teaching Unit.

Documentary evidence is necessary to support nominations for UWS Excellence in Teaching Awards. While assessment is based primarily on the written statement, nominees can choose to submit two of the following supporting materials:

a. a three minute video (which could include footage of the nominee talking about their program, their teaching philosophy or interviews with students)

b. website (URL) c. maximum 10 pages of printed teaching material in PDF format

Key forms of documentary evidence of positive outcomes:

a. Benchmarking services against external providers of similar services (for example, in other universities).

b. Additional letters of support c. Testimonials d. A short curriculum vitae e. Client satisfaction surveys. f. Feedback from student cohorts or other recipients of initiatives supporting claims of

positive outcomes, gathered from whole cohort or group (rather than selected individual testimonial) through formal surveys, focus groups, interviews, etc.

g. Outcomes of student learning, for example, grades, examiners' reports, etc. h. Comparisons of experience, results, etc. between pre-intervention and post-

intervention.


i. Improvements in achieving key performance indicators, for example, retention and progression rates of students.

j. Peer review feedback on processes developed or documentary materials produced. k. Evidence of uptake by others of the nominees' initiatives. l. Public recognition of excellence, for example prizes and awards received, refereed

conference presentations and publications both nationally and internationally, features in broadcast media, and so on.

Other supporting documentary evidence of positive outcomes:

a. Individual testimonials from students, staff, community members, etc. b. Evidence of targeted mentoring and leadership of others, for example through

providing development and networking opportunities to others relevant to the area. c. Documentary materials produced as part of an initiative. d. Invitations to disseminate outcomes of initiatives to colleagues within or beyond the

initiating individual or team.

There is an expectation that applicants grant permission for the Information and Analysis Unit to provide SFT and SFU survey information where relevant.

Essential documentation All nominees for Excellence in Teaching must provide the following documents:

a. Nomination form (proforma provided);

b. Written statement addressing all four selection criteria (maximum of eight A4 pages) c. Evidence of teaching excellence d. Two references.

a. Nomination form

The nomination form reports administrative information of the individual or team. The completed nomination and application must be reviewed and signed by the Dean (or nominee), Unit Head or equivalent (or nominee) before final submission to the Awards and Grants Development Officer in the Learning and Teaching Unit.

b. Written statement

The core element of a nomination for an Award for Teaching Excellence is a written statement in which the nominees describe their contribution to student learning. It is vital that nominees specifically address the selection criteria, and provide evidence to support their claims against each criterion/criteria. February 2015 UWS L&T Awards Page 10 of 12

The written statement is limited to eight A4 pages in total. Any pages in excess of the eight page limit will be removed before being sent to the assessors. It should have four components, presented in this order:

1. A synopsis 2. An overview

3. A statement addressing each criteria:

• Approaches to teaching and support that influence, motivate and inspire students to learn;

• Development of curricula and resources that reflect a command of the field; • Approaches to assessment and feedback that foster independent learning; • Scholarly or professional activities that have influenced and enhanced learning and

teaching.

4. A statement identifying the ways in which the contribution has influenced student learning, engagement and/or the overall student experience, been sustained over time, and been recognised by fellow staff, the institution, and/or the broader community.

c. Evidence of teaching excellence While assessment is based primarily on the written statement addressing the assessment criteria, nominees can choose to submit two of the following supporting materials:

• a three minute video (which could include footage of the nominee talking about their teaching, their teaching philosophy or interviews with students)

• website (URL)

• 10 pages of teaching materials in PDF format

The relevance of all material must be made clear in the written statement. Nominees and institutions must ensure that material on websites is accessible to OLT staff, assessors and the Standing Committee. The OLT is not responsible for allocating access (such as login and password) to the assessors and committee members. The media file may be uploaded onto the Awards portal if it is less than 36 Mb. Files larger than 36 Mb may be submitted via a link to a public domain or a website that can be accessed by the selection panel. The supporting materials will not be returned to the institutions or nominees after the assessment.

d. References

Two references of no more than one A4 page each, to be provided by people who are able to comment on the nominee’s contribution to student learning against the nominated selection criterion. One of the referees MUST be either the Dean of School (or nominee) or Head of Unit (or nominee). If the nomination is from a team, the references should apply to the team. References over one page will be recopied with only the first page provided to the assessors.


Presentation There is no advantage in elaborate presentation of nominations. The first page of the nomination form (provided) is adequate as a cover page. There is no template provided for the written submission but it must be clear and legible. All submissions must adhere to the following: Formatting guidelines: Margins are required to be 2cm on each side of the page with clear paragraph definition Text is required to be 12 point font in either Calibri or Arial. File name: Your surname and UWS LTA and year (One combined PDF) A complete submission will comprise: The nomination form Written statement (eight A4 pages maximum) Supporting evidence of teaching excellence Two references Submissions should be emailed in PDF format to Dr Susan Mowbray at [email protected] with UWS LTA Application in the subject line. Vice-Chancellor’s Excellence in Teaching Award The Vice-Chancellor's Excellence in Teaching Award winner will be chosen from the pool of four UWS Excellence in Teaching Award winners, as recommended by the UWS Awards Panel.



UWS Learning and Teaching Awards 2015 Excellence in Teaching*

*The Vice-Chancellor’s Excellence in Teaching Award will be chosen from the pool of four UWS L&T Excellence in Teaching Award winners

Excellence in Teaching Nomination Form SECTION 1 NOMINEE DETAILS

INDIVIDUAL

Staff Id Number Contact Number

Name (incl title)

Position/ Title Length of Service

School/ Unit

Email Address

TEAM

Team Name

Team Leader

Position / Title School / Unit

Team Members

1. School / Unit

2. School / Unit

3. School / Unit

4. School / Unit

5. School / Unit

6. School / Unit

7. School / Unit

8. School / Unit

(if insufficient space, please attach a list)

SECTION 2 SIGNATURE OF NOMINEE

I/We hereby give permission for the University of Western Sydney, to use my/our photograph/s in official University business, including: websites, newsletters, newspapers and promotional material. It is agreed that the use of the photograph/s shall in no way be used in any other forum other than for official University business.

Nominee Name: Signature

OPC Administration Only

Date Received / / 2015 Application No.

Page 1 of 6

SECTION 3 STATEMENT OF SUPPORT – DVC & VP/ VP/ PVC/ Dean of School /Executive Director

or Director

1. Please state reasons for supporting this nomination

Name:

Position: DVC & VP/ VP/ PVC/ Dean of School /Executive Director or Director

(please circle or bold)

Signature: Page 2 of 6

SECTION 4 SELECTION CRITERIA

Instructions for preparing your nomination: The written statement is comprised of the following sections within a maximum of 8 pages:

A. Synopsis The synopsis must be between 150-200 words and written in the third person. It must cover the nominee’s teaching area or discipline, teaching experience, the particular focus of their teaching, teaching methods, and their research/teaching interests.

B. Overview The overview can comprise: a description of your teaching context (e.g. courses and units taught; the numbers/year levels/backgrounds of your students), your teaching approach and philosophy; a summary of the achievements you will be presenting in response to the selection criteria and how your achievements align with UWS missions.

C. A response to each of the selection criteria below with evidence to support the claims: 1. Approaches to learning and teaching that influence, motivate and inspire students to learn

2. Development of curricula and resources that reflect a command of the field

3. Evaluation practices that bring about improvements in teaching and learning

4. Innovation, leadership or scholarship that has influenced and enhanced learning and teaching and/or the student experience

Assessment criteria Nominations will be assessed by the following:

• The extent to which the claims for excellence are supported by formal and informal evaluation

• The extent of creativity, imagination or innovation, irrespective of whether the approach involves traditional learning environments or technology-based developments

• Information contained in references and selected supporting materials submitted by the nominee

Page 3 of 6

SECTION 5 REFEREE REPORTS

1. Referee report to support nomination

Page 4 of 6

2. Referee report to support this nomination

Page 5 of 6

SECTION 6 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

While assessment is based primarily on the written statement, nominees can choose to submit two of the following supporting materials:

a. a three minute video (which could include footage of the nominee talking about their program, their teaching philosophy or interviews with students) b. website (URL) c. 10 pages of printed teaching material in PDF format

Please submit your application along with 7 copies to: Manager, HR Support Services Office of People and Culture Building AE Werrington North Campus By close of business 7 September 2015 NOTE: This application will be acknowledged via email by 14 September 2015. If you do not receive acknowledgement, by 14 September, please phone x7890 or email [email protected].

Page 6 of 6


university of western sydney uws learning and teaching awards … · 2015-08-19 · • provide a...

Documents