untitled

14
THERMOGRAPHY REPORT GOL GUMBAZ, BIJAPUR, KARNATAKA

Upload: api-160949726

Post on 26-Oct-2014

30 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Untitled

THERMOGRAPHY

REPORT

GOL GUMBAZ,

BIJAPUR, KARNATAKA

Page 2: Untitled

Thermography Report

A Thermographic survey was requested by Dharwad Circle, Archaeological Survey of India. The Monuments surveyed was : Gol Gumbaz, Bijapur The survey carried was qualitative in nature. Qualitative thermographic survey relies on analysis of thermal patterns to reveal the existence and locate the position of anomalies, and to evaluate them for further research and investigation.

Client: Dharwad Circle, Archaeological Survey of India

Address: Dharwad

Thermography date: 25th and 26th May, 2012

Location: Gol Gumbaz, Bijapur

Thermographer: ReArk, Bangalore

Outdoor temperature: 39 C

Weather: Sunny

2

Page 3: Untitled

Contents

1. Plan and 3D View of Gol Gumbaz

2. 3D Model

3. Analysis of each exterior face

1. SOUTH FACE

2. EAST FACE

3. NORTH FACE

4. WEST FACE

3

Page 4: Untitled

Plan of the Gol Gumbaz, Bijapur

Three dimensional view of Gol Gumbaz, Bijapur; showing the cardinal directions

4

Page 5: Untitled

5

Page 6: Untitled

fig (a): Left blind arch, south façade

fig (b): Infrared photograph of the same arch

Comments The following images show the presence of hidden architectural features behind the present plasterwork.

L R

SOUTH FACE

6

Page 7: Untitled

fig (c): Right blind arch, south façade

fig (d, e): Infrared thermography has revealed a row of possible fenestrations behind the present facade

Comments The following images show the presence of a series of fenestrations behind the present plasterwork. These fenestrations, decorative and arched could have possibly been niches in the 3m thick wall. They are likely to have been filled in at a later stage. Though the building was technically completed in 1656 A.D., decorations were not. After the death of the Sultan, Mohammed Adil Shah, all work on the monument (decorations and fine details) was stopped. Possibly, these fenestrations were incomplete and therefore plastered over to give a neater finish to the mausoleum.

fig (d) fig (e)

7

Page 8: Untitled

EAST

FACE

fig (f): Left arch, east façade fig (h): Right arch, east façade

fig (g): Infrared thermography has revealed presence of a hidden

fenestration and another material behind the façade

fig (i): Infrared thermography has revealed the presence of another material behind the plasterwork

Comments The following images show the existence of fenestrations behind the façade as well as the presence of a different material embedded in the masonry. This material could have been wood, possibly a part of the original structure of the fenestration.

L R

8

Page 9: Untitled

fig (j): Left arch, north façade

fig (k, l): infrared thermography of the arch has revealed a hidden fenestration and the presence of another material inside the masonry

Comments The following images show the existence of fenestrations behind the façade as well as the presence of a different material, possibly wood, embedded in the masonry.

L R

fig (k) fig (l)

NORTH

FACE

9

Page 10: Untitled

fig (m): Right arch, north façade

fig (n, o, p): thermographic images of the same arch have revealed hidden fenestrations as well as another material present behind the plaster

Comments The following images show the existence of fenestrations behind the façade, which may have been openings to cavities in the 3m thick wall.

fig (o)

10

fig (n)

fig (p)

Page 11: Untitled

L R

Comments The following images show the existence of fenestrations behind the façade which may or may not have been true windows. It may have simply been a niche in the wall, covered up later.

fig (q): Left arch, west façade

fig (r): thermographic photography of the arch has revealed possible fenestrations present behind the present façade

WEST FACE

11

Page 12: Untitled

Comments The following images show the existence of fenestrations behind the façade as well as the presence of a different material, possibly wood, embedded in the masonry. The image also shows the extent of the damage to the thick layer of plaster. This could be because of the orientation of the right arch of this particular wall in the south-west direction.

fig (s): Right arch, west façade; Note the damage to the plaster, possibly due to

weathering

fig (t): Infrared thermography has revealed fenestrations present behind this arch as well as a different material

present in the masonry

12

fig (u): Infrared thermography has also revealed the depth of the

cavities caused to the deterioration of the plaster

Page 13: Untitled

Recommended Action

This thermographic survey has revealed many hidden features of the monument which were previously unknown. It has also revealed the extent of damage to the southwest arch. This requires further inspection and a thorough thermographic survey is recommended, supplemented with other techniques of investigation.

13

Page 14: Untitled

14

ReArk Bangalore, India Phone: +91 9740651700 e-mail: [email protected]

www.reark.in