u.p. financial corporation statement of cases...

1

Srl No.

Regional Office:

S. No.

W.P. No. Name of parties Amount OSP Involved (Rs. In lacs)

C.A.Filed or not

Interim Order, if any. Name of Counsel with phone no., address & Email

Remarks/ Brief of the suit

1 Agra 1 14335/88 Seth Glass Works Vs. Collector & others.

3.01 FILED · Petitioner has challenged order of re-auction dt. 9.9.85 passed by Collector and 11.7.88 passed by Commissioner, Agra.Unit sold under R.C.

2 Agra 2 FAFO No. 2/91

R.S. Sugar Works Vs. UPFC 0.45 FILED Shri R.P. Mishra It is L.L.S. Case. R.C. issued.

3 Agra 3 FAFO No. 9/92

Sikarwar Ice Factory Vs. UPFC

6.85 FILED Shri A.A. Khan FAFO filed against the order of Lower Court order whereby stay application was rejected. Objection filed. Unit sold under R.C.

4 Agra 4 /93 S.K. Gupta Vs UPFC & others ( M/s. Shri Bhagwan Rice Mill )

0.00 FILED Shri P. Kumar The W.P. filed against our action of sale U/S-29.Unit sold U/S-29, Sale deed executed.

5 Agra 5 35921/93 Vishnu Cement Tiles Vs UPFC

2.53 FILED Shri P. Kumar C.A. filed. The Counsel has been requested to expedite case. PRC pending with Revenue Authority for execution. Unit sold U/S-29.

6 Agra 6 26360/94 Ashwani Kumar Gautam Vs UPFC ( M/s. Durga Industries, Mathura. )

0.00 FILED Dismissed in default on 28.11.97. Restoration application was filed by the petitioner. Objection filed. Case lastly listed on 22.3.07.Unit sold U/S-29.

7 Agra 7 27044/04 Shri Laxmi Niwas paper Mill Vs. UPFC

1.13 FILED Shri A.A. Khan This W.P. was filed against U/S-29. C.A. filed on 10.8.04.Unit sold U/S-29.

8 Agra 8 Civil Revenue No. 50/06

Colour Coasts & Chemical Vs UPFC

0.00 FILED Shri P.S. Baghel This Civil Revision filed by the borrower against order dt. 27.1.02 passed by IIIrd ACJ(Sr.Div.), Mathura in O.S. No. 310/90. C.A. Filed on 15.2.06 on the request of the borrower the court permitted the borrower to deposit Rs. 25,000/- at his own risk. The amount, if so deposited within 3 weeks from today the same shall be accepted. Unit sold U/S-29.

9 Agra 9 51590/07 Goverdhan Nath Oil Mill Vs. State of U.P. & Others.

25.65 FILED Shri P.S. Baghel W.P. filed against P.R.C. and citation dt. 20.10.04. No order passed. C.A. filed. Unit sold U/S-29.

U.P. FINANCIAL CORPORATIONSTATEMENT OF CASES PENDING HIGH COURT

2

10 Agra 10 26400/07 Col. Ramesh Singh Vs. State of U.P. & Other ( M/s. Ramesh Shanti Chemical & Fertilizers, Firozabad ).

15.00 FILED Shri R. Singh · W.P. challenging R.C. On 6.6.07 the High Court stayed recovery in pursuant to the citation dt. 23.4.07. The Court however has permitted us to make recovery pursuant to the earlier citation dt. 4.3.04 provided of court the said order has not been recalled by the Court (against the earlier R.C. A W.P. no. 13255/02 was filed by M/s. Ramesh Shanti Chem. & Fert. VS. State and got stay but this W.P. was dismissed in default on 7.7.04. C.A. filed. Unit sold U/S-29.

11 Agra 11 17921/07 Shri Annapurna Rice Mill Vs State of U.P. & Others.

50.95 FILED Shri A.A. Khan The present W.P. filed by the petitioner to stay the auction proceedings initiated in pursuance of the auction notice dt. 22.2.07. On 5.4.07 High Court stayed the auction proceedings dt. 22.2.07 provided the petitioner deposits a sum of Rs. 5.00 lacs within 6 weeks from today. Petitioner not complied the order. R.C. ISSUED.

12 Agra 12 1640/08 Pratap Chand Agarwal Vs. State of U.P. & Others ( M/s. Deepak Rice Mill )

0.00 FILED Shri Satish Chaturvedi W.P. challenging recovery of Trade Tax. C.A. pending. Unit sold U/S-29.

13 Agra 13 10136/08 Hirdesh Industries Vs State of U.P. & Others.

0.49 FILED Shri D. Awasthi. W.P. filed challenging R.C. No order passed C.A. filed on 12.3.08 and an affidavit also filed on behalf of UPFC on 27.3.08

14 Agra 14 21796/10 Shyama Devi Cold Storage Vs S.B.I. & Others.

FILED Shri D. Awasthi. W.P. against the Bank.

15 Agra 15 FAFO No. 453/10

Shri Bhagwan Rice Mill Vs. UPFC

0.00 FILED Appeal filed against the order of Civil Judge Firozabad. Unit sold U/S-29.

16 Agra 16 W.P. No. /14

Shah Oil Mill Vs UPFC & Others

2.04 FILED Borrower challenging our approval of OTS by filing this W.P.

3

17 Agra 17 Iind appeal No. Nil/05

UPFC Vs Shah K.S. Gupta ( M/s. Shahji & Co. Mathura.)

0.35 FILED S. Chaturvedi Respondents Sri K.S. Gupta and Sri Avinash Saran Gupta both S/O Sri Gauri Sharan Gupta had filed a suit no. 372/95 before C.J., Mathura stating that his father had taken loan of Rs. 35,000/- and Rs. 25,000/- in the year 1962 and 1964 respectively for the manufacturing of ribets, screw and pins etc. and thereafter third loan of Rs. 40,000/- was obtained by his father as a HUF in 1967 by executing registered mortgage deed on 28.7.67 in the name and style of M/s. Shahji & Co. He further stated that at that time plaintiff were not matured. They signed the papers on the saying of their father. Recovery is time barred. Therefore, they are not liable to make the payment. The said suit was decided in their favour. Then Corporation filed an appeal no. 97/98 before ADJ, Mathura who decided the appeal on 30.5.2005 against the Corporation. Now IInd appeal has been filed against judgement dt. 30.3.05 of ADJ, Mathura in Civil Appeal no. 97/98 whereby appeal of UPFC against decree of lower court was Rejected. Lower court has restrained UPFC from recovery and the same is pending for disposal. LEGAL OPINION: Party may be pursued for OTS.

18 Agra 18 41738/08 Shyama Devi Cold Storage Vs UPFC

77.16 D. Awasthi. Borrower filed W.P. against our notice U/S-29 dt. 16.7.08 in which recovery stayed. Coporation could not disbursed sanctioned amount on account of Board decision of the Corporation. The details of this case is that High Court has passed the order dt. 20.8.08 stating that the balance amount of Rs. 18.00 lacs and odd has not been released vide letter dt. 26.12.07. UPFC has expressed its inability for releasing the further amount. The project of the petitioner for the want of finance has been held up and petitioner is put in a situation that neither it can continue with the project nor is a position to repay the dues. High Court stayed the operation of the notice dt. 16.7.2008 with the further remarks that the matter requires the consideration. LEGAL OPINION: Party may be pursued for OTS.

4

19 Agra 19 30311/06 M.V. Inds. Vs UPFC 6.73 R. Singh. In this case Original borrower filed W.P. against the advertisement of fresh sale U/S-29 of SFC’s Act. 1951. The details of the case is that possession was taken over by the Corporation and sold in 1986 to M/s. Bansal Marble, Chhipitola, Agra. Borrower challenged the sale of the unit and quashing the entire sale proceedings by means of CMWP no. 361/87. The W.P. was allowed by the High Court on 19.12.97 and the entire proceedings in pursuance of the advertisement for sale of the unit dt. 21.8.86 U/S-29 of SFC’s Act, 1951 dt. 21.8.86 was setaside. Corporation filed the Review Application which was rejected by the High Court on 13.1.2000. Corporation filed SLP in Supreme Court against the order of High Court dt. 19.12.97 which was dismissed on 17.8.2001. Only relief was given against the officers of the Corporation in respect of structure. Rest order of High Court was upheld. The then Law Officer,Sri N.K.K.Dixit noted on the file that High Court rejected the Review application mentioning as follows:- “UPFC may proceed U/S-29 of SFC’s Act, 1951, the Court has issued, no injunction order”. On this basis, Corporation issued fresh advertisement dt. 20.5.06 but High Court stayed the same as above vide order dt. 26.5.06.

20 Agra 20 54963/07 Jai Shree Ram Oil Mill Vs State of U.P. & Others.

5.40 D. Awasthi. Borrower challenging our action under R.C. High Court vide order dt. 6.11.2007 recovery proceedings against the petitioner in pursuance of recovery action has been stayed until further order.

21 Agra 21 37453/01 Garg Oil Industries Vs UPFC & Others.

0.00 FILED A.A. Khan. W.P. filed challenging our recovery action U/S-29. UnitsoldU/S-29. Sale Deed executed. Hon’ble High Court ordered till further status quo be maintained

22 Agra 22 19503/06 Khyoraj Singh Vs Board of Revnue Lucknow ( M/s. Shree Annapurna Rice Mill, Mainpuri.)

50.95 FILED P.S. Baghel. W.P. has filed against the operation of order dt. 23.3.2006 passed by Board of Revenue in Revision no. 244(Sale)03-04 order dt. 21.1.2004 passed by Commissioner, Kanpur Division and subsequent auction dt.21.6.2004, High Court vide order dt. 17.4.2006 has passed following order “UNTIL THE NEXT DATE OF LISTING THE PARTY SHALL MAINTAIN

5

23 Agra 23 Iind appeal No. 469/09

Ram Singh Vs UPFC ( M/s. Shiv printing Press )

0.21 FILED D. Awathi. IT IS A COMPOSITE LOAN CASE and the petitioner Sri Ram Singh S/O Sri Gokul Chand has filed a suit no. 396/92 stating that Sri Ram Singh Monia S/O Sri Gokul Singh and Sri Ram Singh S/O Sri Gokul Chand are two different person and the petitioner has not taken any loan from Corporation. C.J., Mathura has decided the suit in favour of the plaintiff on 9.12.98. Corporation filed an appeal no. 26/99 before ADJ,Mathura against the said order. The said appeal decided on 12.2.2009 in favour of the Corporation. Now Appellant further prayed to stay the operation & effect of the the IInd Appeal has been filed before Hon’ble High Court and judgement and decree dt. 12.2.09 of ACJ, Mathura Court setting aside the judgement and order dt. 9.12.98 in O.S. no. 396/02. Appeal was listed on 15.5.09 and after argument High Court has directed that until further orders the effect and operation of judgement & decree dt. 12.2.09 passed in Civil Appeal no. 26/99 by the ACJ shall remain stayed provided the plaintiff appellant furnishes security other than cash or bank guarantee for a sum of Rs. 65,000/- to the satisfaction of the trial court within a period of one month from today. In case of default in complying with the aforesaid condition this interim order shall stand automatically vacated. Security was deposited by the party in the Lower Court.

24 Agra 24 3904/03 Paliwal Glass Works Vs State of U.P. & Others.

0.00 FILED D. Awathi. The Corporation issued PRC against which Borrower filed writ in which High Court has ordered parties be maintained status quo only for Khasra no. 20, 21, 22.Mohmdapur, Shikohabad, Distt. Firozabad. Collateral security sold under R.C. Amount is not being shown as no stay against our recovery action, STAY IS ONLY FOR STATUS QUO for personal properties which has already been sold by the borrower.

25 Aligarh 1 26197/02 Sri Mamta Agarwal, Director M/s Swalika Properties (P) Ltd., Aligarh Vs. UPFC, Collector, Tehsildar & Compay

22.28 31.10.2002

Stay order passed on 08.07.2002.

Sri Gautam Baghel Stay order passed against the attachement/ sale of house situated at Noida

6

26 Aligarh 2 9861/87 Manoj Kr Sharma VsCollector Aligarh Sri Ravindra Kumar Sharma, Propriter M/s Pooran Rice Mill,Aligarh

6.09 19.09.1988

Stay order passed on 21.05.1987

Sri Ateek Ahmad Khan Engar Brother of borrower filed W.P.claiming 50% of mortgaged landbelongs to him. Since he is minor so the 1/2 of property can't be auctioned.

27 Aligarh 3 18293/2000

Sri Sohan Lal Kela Vs UPFCSri Sohan Lal Kela,DirectorM/s Brij Mohan Solvent (P) Ltd. (P) Ltd.

3.52 21.10.2008

Stay order dated 05.04.2007

Sri Gautam Baghel Obtained stay order on the base of wrong facts.

28 Aligarh 4 236032/13 Sri Bhagwan Agarwal V/s U.P.F.C. & others (M/s Consel Die Casting)

5.84 13.09.2010


Sri Gautam Baghel Guaranter mortgager obtained stay.

29 Aligarh 5 28123/1990

Brij Mohan Varshney V/s Dy Collector ( Collection) Trade Tax Deptt. . ( Sri Manvendra Sharma M/s Krishna Indus. Aligarh.

0.00 Oct.,2015


Sri Ateek Ahmad Khan Exparty Dismissed & restores.

30 Aligarh 6 1662/87 UPFC Vs Satya Prakash & Ors(legal heir) M/s Sarswat PottoriesLate Babu Lal,Proprietor

1.11 No Stay Sri Gautam Baghel FAFO filed against the decistion of the lower court.

31 Aligarh 7 16363/97 UPFC Vs Fifth ADJ,EtahM/s Diwakar Oil IndsSri Suneel Kumar,Prop..

April,1997

No Stay Sri Ateek Ahmad Khan Case of lower court decided in favour of Guarantor hence this revision. ( Composite case)

32 Aligarh 8 125/06 UPFC Vs Allauddin M/s Zaiba TextilesMohd.Shakeel Qureshi,Prop.

0.30 May.2006

No Stay Sri Gautam Baghel Case of lower Court decided in favour of purchaser hence this revision

33 Aligarh 9 428/89 UPFC Vs Natwar Nand kishoreM/s Upadhyay Glass WorksProp.N.N.Upadhyay

0.16 May. 1993

No Stay Sri Ateek Ahmad Khan Appeal was dismissed vide dated 13/5/1993 against UPFC and file restoration aplication is pending beofre HC.

34 Aligarh 10 15221/2007

Smt. Nirmla Devi Vs UPFCPartner Sri Mukesh Kumar Athaiya & Sri Nitya Nand Athaiya ( M/s Export Metal Aligarh )

0.00 July.2007

No Stay Sri Gautam Baghel Party is being pursued for O.T.S.

7

35 Aligarh 11 55999/2012

Anand Kumar V/s U.P.F.C. M/s Anand Lock Co. Aligarh.

0.00 18/12/2012

No Stay Sri Gautam Baghel Sale letter issued to purchaser. Down payment receipt.

36 Aligarh 12 14268/2013

Anand Kumar V/s UPFC.M/s Anand Lock Co. Aligarh.

0.00 2013 No Stay Sri Gautam Baghel Sale letter issued to purchaser. Down payment received.

37 Aligarh 13 254/2006 U.P.F.C. V/s Usha Rani ( M/s Shree Durga Rice Mill, Jalesar, Etah) Civil Misc. delay condonation application No. 05/2017 Smt. Usha Rani V/s U.P.F.C.& others ( M/s Sree Durga Rice Mill, Jalesar, Distt. Etah.

38.28 April,2006

No Stay Sri Gautam Baghel Revision filed by U.P.F.C. against order dated 25.02.2006 passed the by C.J ( S.D.) Etah in O.S. No. 377/2003. Restoration application filed by Smt.Usha Rani against order dt. 08.07.2016 passed by the C.J. ( S.D.) Etah. Date of hearing was 20.02.16. parawise narrative alongwith Brief History of the case sent to Shri Gautam Baghel Adv. Allahabad & R.O. Allahabad on 21.02.2017.

38 Allahabad 1 11488/2006

M/s Khushuboo Textiles (P) Ltd. Sri Santosh Kumar Jaiswal vs State of UP,Allahabad

2.36 Filed Stay of citation dt. 30.11.2005

S.K. Srivastava, 094153.60528

Persueing the early vacation of stay order

39 Allahabad 2 47159/ 2014

Lalji Yadav vs State of U.P. M/s Munna Oil Mill ,Alld

1.37 Filed Stayed No Coercive shall be taken against the petitioner



40 Allahabad 3 56262/ 2007

Sri G D Dwivedi vs State of UP M/s Dwivedi Nursing Home,Alld

1.13 Filed Being proceedingstaying against RC



41 Allahabad 4 53772/ 2007

M/s Shree Girija |Prasad Dal Mill Vs State Of UP,Alld

7.85 Filed Being proceedingstaying against RC



42 Allahabad 5 27659/ 2013

Sacham Dal Mill Sri Ashok Kumar Sachan vs State

Filed Staying the citatikon order dated 24..04.2013



43 Allahabad 6 51488 /2008

Frontier Alloys Steel Ltd. Vs State of UP

0.43 Filed WP filed Against solvage value>HighCourt has stayed recovery proceeding



44 Allahabad 7 13060/ 2007

Javed Ahmad Khan vs State M/s Bhaat Cement Jali Works vs State of UP

11.39 Filed To quash charge sheet no. 10/2006 arising out of case 257/2007


No stay

45 Allahabad 8 47053/ 2011

Kavita Enterprises vs State of UP M/s Ajeet Plastic ,Alld

0.15 Filed WP has filed Against dues of electricity


No stay

46 Allahabad 9 55393/ 2012

Kavita Enterprises vs State of UP M/s Ajeet Plastic ,Alld

0.00 Filed WP has filed Against recovery of lease premium demanded by GM DIC


No stay

8

47 Allahabad 10 945/ 2013 Kedar Nath Kesharwani vs State of UP M/s Poly pack Inds ,Alld

0.00 Filed WP has filed Against DIC purchaser of M/s PolyPack Inds ,Alld,UPFC is a formal party


No stay

48 Allahabad 11 7212 /2013

M/s Khushuboo Textiles (P) Ltd. Sri Santosh Kumar Jaiswal vs State of UP,Allahabad

0.00 Filed W.P has been filed challanging the RC issued by DIC,Allahabad& has sought No relief against the orporation.UPFC is profarma respodant


No stay

49 Allahabad 12 18265 /19995

Natey Yadv vs State of UP M/s Gayatri Gases P.Ltd.,Fatehpur

14.56 Filed The auction proceeding stayed


No stay

50 Allahabad 13 Cr. Appl No. 24257/2009

Pramod Kuam Jain Vs State of UP M/s P K Profiles Fatehpur

81.81 Filed S.K. Srivastava, 094153.60528

No stay

51 Allahabad 14 6138/ 1993

RamKrishna Singh Vs State of UP M/s Surendra Kalin Udyof, Alld

0.10 Filed No stay UPFC is free to take recovery action


No stay

52 Allahabad 15 50396 /2013

Smt. Sharda Singh Vs state of UP M/s New allahabad Engg. Works,Alld

0.00 Filed Against Sale S.K. Srivastava, 094153.60528

No stay

53 Allahabad 16 41224/ 2011

M/s Bentax Industries Vs Sanjay Kumar Gupta Purchaser M/s Sushila Alloys, Fatehpur

0.10 Short CA Filed

Against land dispute S.K. Srivastava, 094153.60528

No stay

54 Allahabad 17 39194/ 2006

Deepak Mitra Vs UPFC M/s Mitra Prakashan P.Ltd,Alld

7.19 Against R.C. A.A.Khan 09335152058 No stay

55 Allahabad 18 6045 /1991

Subhash Chandra Vs UPFC M/s Fatehpur Steel Works,Fatehpur

0.98 No stay,UPFC is free to take recovery action


No stay

56 Allahabad 19 Rev.TTR 367/ 2008

Frontier Alloys Steel Ltd. Vs the Comm. Of Trade Tam UP Lucknow

0.00 This TTR filed against recovery of Solvage value


No stay





No stay





No stay

59 Allahabad 22 FAFO 262/1993

Ghanshyam Gupta Vs UPFC M/s Nisha Oil Udyog

0.53 Bus financed by BOB was auctioned by R.A. in RC of UPFC


No stay

9

60 Allahabad 23 /1988 Hansraj Jaiswal Vs UPFC M/s Jaiswal Ice Candy

0.36 No stay UPFC is free to take recovery action


No stay

61 Allahabad 24 17919/ 2007

Laxmi Oil Mill vs UPFC 0.00 High court has passed to maintain status quo by party


No stay

62 Allahabad 25 23148/ 1994

Mewa Lal vs Collector Allahabad M/s Mewa Lal Masala Udyog,Ald

0.00 Counsel has been requested to get the case disposed of


No stay

63 Allahabad 26 /2005 Mitra Prakashan Vs UPFC 0.00 Interim order has been passed


No stay

64 Allahabad 27 27964/ 1994

Kumar Kashtha Kala Kendra ,Ald Mohan Sohan Roshan Sukhdev Vs D.J. Alld

0.24 No stay UPFC is free to take recovery action

A.A.Khan 09335152058 No stay

65 Allahabad 28 15050/ 1995

Moti Lal Vs UPFC 0.17 No interim order has been passed


No stay

66 Allahabad 29 20025/ 2002

Rajesh Kumar Gupta Vs Collector Kanpur M/s Sushila Alloys, Fatehpur

0.10 Against RC S.K. Srivastava, 094153.60528

No stay

67 Allahabad 30 58472/ 2006

Roomi Industries vs UPFC 3.42 Against RC S.K. Srivastava, 094153.60528

No stay

68 Allahabad 31 40770/ 2002

Smt. RamJanki Vs Collector M/s Allahabad wire Drawing

12.46 PRC returned unit sold A.A.Khan 09335152058 No stay

69 Allahabad 32 24824/ 2007

Uma Plastic Udyog Vs UPFC

3.60 No interim order has been passed


No stay

70 Allahabad 33 FAFO 374/ 2001

UPFC Vs J S Metal P.Ltd. 27.52 Short CA Filed

Againt the order of lower court dated 16.02.2001


71 Allahabad 34 S A 1163/ 2000

UPFC vs Vijay Kuamr Shukla M/s Shankar Iron Industries, Fatehpur

0.24 UPFC has filed the @nd Appeal against the decree dated 25.5.2000


72 Allahabad 35 19972 /1988

Janta Surkhi Works Vs UPFC

0.00 S.K. Srivastava, 094153.60528

No stay

73 Allahabad 36 Rev 74/ 1989

Rajendra Bhan Singh Vs UPFC M/s Kiksan Cold Storage

0.00 A.A.Khan 09335152058 No stay

74 Allahabad 37 13002/ 1994

Hari Narain Singh Vs UPFC M/s Rashik Oil Mill

2.40 Againsr RC. RC Withdrawn hence become infructuous


No stay

75 Allahabad 38 /2004 State of UP Vs UPFC M/s Sri Ganesh Narain Rice Mill

0.00 Against dificiency of stamp duty in sale deed & sale deed was executed by UPFC


76 Allahabad 39 34026/ 2002

Viswanath Jaiswal vs State of UP M/s Sharda Rice & Dal Mill

14.33 A.A.Khan 09335152058 No stay

10

77 Allahabad 40 /1999 Wakar ahmad Vs UPFC M/s Allahabad Computer Accedemy


78 Allahabad 41 13002/ 1994

Hari Narain Singh Vs UPFC M/s Rashik Oil Mill

2.40 Againsr RC. RC Withdrawn hence become infructuous


No stay

79 Allahabad 42 /2004 State of UP Vs UPFC M/s Sri Ganesh Narain Rice Mill

0.00 Against dificiency of stamp duty in sale deed & sale deed was executed by UPFC


80 Allahabad 43 34026/ 2002

Viswanath Jaiswal vs State of UP M/s Sharda Rice & Dal Mill

14.33 A.A.Khan 09335152058 No stay

81 Allahabad 44 /1999 Wakar ahmad Vs UPFC M/s Allahabad Computer Accedemy


82 Bareilly 1 3677/04 Usha Rani Gupta Vs State & others (Shiva Cold Storage, Buduan

3.33 filed Party moved before Comissioner against sale u/s 29 which rejected and challenged before Board of Revenue which also rejected

Sri Nripendra Mishra 19, Tashkand Road, Civil Lines Allahabad Mob.9415214375

Assets of prime security sold u/s 29 and PRC issued. House of petitioner auctioned. Objection filed before Commissioner which was rejected. This order was challenged before Board of Revenue which was also rejected. Court passed order that in the meantime petitioner shall not dispossed from the house in question

83 Bareilly 2 42696/04 Manjit Singh Vs UPFC & ORS (V.AR. Products, Pilibhit (Sri Vikarjit Singh)

6.29 filed Assets of unit sold u/s 29 RC issued on 23.11.2001 which was chalalenged in Civil Suit. Suit was dismissed in default on 09.02.204 when the restoration was filed but rejecated on 23.7.04. Both orders dated 09.02.2004 and 23.07.2004 were challenged in the instant petition. Hon'ble HIgh Court passed order dated 14.10.2004 that till the next date of listing the recovery proceeding against petitioner in respect of origional suit No. 28/2002 and remain stayed.

84 Bareilly 3 61664/09 N.N. Industries,Bareilly & ORS Vs State & others (Nasirudding Khan)

4.23 filed Sri Nripendra Mishra 19, Tashkand Road, Civil Lines Allahabad Mob.9415214375

WP filed by p;arty against RC and Hon'ble High Court passed order dated 20.11.2009 that until further orders of the Court, recovery proceeding against petitioner initiated by the respondent shall remain stayed. However it shall be open to the respondanats to proceed with the recovery proceedings in appropriate forum

11

85 Bareilly 4 18841/02 Navbahar Singh & ors Vs State of U.P. & Others (Gramin Udyogshala Cane Crusher Bijnor, LLS Case) Sri Sher Singh, Ram Lal Singh, Hukum Singh & Navbahar Singh & Kalyan Singh


unit already auctioned in exeuction in execution of RC. PRC issued by Corpn on 04.04.02. The present WP has been filed by party challenging the recoovery action as time barred. Hon'ble High Court v ide order dated 06.05.02 stayed the recovery proceeding against the petitioner till the next date of hearing as alleged that recovery of loan is time bared. Stay vacation application with C.A, filed in 2004.

86 Bareilly 5 FAFO 432/99

UPFC vs Digvijay Tondon & ORS (A.N. Cement Pvt.Ltd. (Digvijay Tondon & Sri Amar Nath Tondon & Sri Mohit Tondon)

54.82 Filed Sri Nripendra Mishra 19, Tashkand Road, Civil Lines Allahabad Mob.9415214375

Unit disposed by Crpn. u/.s 29 for Rs. 34.50 lacs. PRC issued against guarantor/directors of the Co. for balance dues. Civil Court granted injuction order in suit No.10/99 not to realise the dues from two directors on the ground of their retirement from the board of directors of the Co. against which corporation filed the present FAFO in High Court. Hon'ble High Court vide its order dated 11.05.99 stayed the operation of order of lower court. Subsequently High Court vide order dated 24.02.03 directed that the Corporation may take action as per the diection of Apex Court passed in the case of Unique budyle. Counsel is being pursued for early listing of FAFO

87 Bareilly 6 62427/10 M/s Sparsh Tansport Carriers Pvt.Ltd. Bareilly Vs UPFC & others (Tara Enterprises )

4.49 Filed Sri Atiq Ahmed Khan In faront of High Court Police Chowki, Allahabad 9335152058

W.P. Filed against RC. Hon'ble High Court vide order 11.10.10 stayed the recovery proceeding against the petitioner. CA alongwith stay vacation. Application filed . Counsel requested to take steps for listing the case

88 Bareilly 7 58302/11 Smt. Usha Rani Gupta Vs UPFC & others (Polythene Audyogic Utpadan Sahkari Samiti Bareilly (Usha Rani & Mahaveer Prasad)

6.89 Filed Recoery Proceeding Sri Nripendra Mishra 19, Tashkand Road, Civil Lines Allahabad Mob.9415214375

Petitioner filed the writ challanging the RC of corporation on the case of Unique butyle

89 Bareilly 8 525/2012 Smt. Laxmi Devi & Ors. VS RM UPFC (Agarwal Products Bazpur, (US Nagar ) SriVishweshar Lal Agarwal

10.08 filed Sri Naresh Pant, 254 cheenakhan lane Talli tal Nainital 9411167564

To quash the public notice dated 30.04.2011 published in Dainik Jagran

90 Bareilly 9 1965/2012 Jagannath Patra Vs State & others (Star Minerals Haldwani (Jagannath Patra U& Smt. Updesh Garg)

3.41 filed Recovery proceeding Sri Naresh Pant, Hon'ble Court stayed recovery proceedings subject to payament of Rs. 3.50 lacs to the Corporation whch he paid but not submitted OTS proposal

91 Bareilly 10 25837/94 Ramesh Plastic Inds. Vs State & ors (Ramesh Chandra Gupta


WP filed against RC issued by the Corpn. Party prayed to quash the recovery action of corporation. CA filed

12

92 Bareilly 11 30612/02 Smt. Shamin Ashraf Vs Collector (Informatic Computers, Bareilly)


WP filed with the prayer to stay the Kothi No.1 situated at Chauni Ashraf Khan Baeilly

93 Bareilly 12 36704/07 Smt. Sudha Gupta Vs State & Others (Sri Radhey Shyam Cherua, Sahjahanpur )


WP filed not to auction the personal property of petitioner which is attached in pursuance of RC of Corporation.

94 Bareilly 13 /1993 Jaheer Dying & Printing VS UPFC


This is a composite loan case. WP filed to quash recovery proceedings

95 Bareilly 14 Revision 45938/99

UPFC Vs D.J. Bijnor ( Asia Engineering works, Bijnor)


Revision filed by Corporation against the order of Distt Judge rejecting the appeal of corporation

96 Bareilly 15 2nd appeal/ 2002

Hotel E-Wan-E-Shahi Vs UPFC & others


This is 2nd appeal filed by the party challenging the order of Distt. Court dated 26.02.02 in 1st appeal No, 30/84 filed by the party. The 1st appeal was decided in favour of corporation upholding the judgement passed by Civil Jude rejecting the originalo suit on account of non maintainablity. No order from HIgh Court has been passed so far.

97 Bareilly 16 40983/06 Farhan Ali Khan Vs State & ors (Goods Era Mentha Rampujr)

2.72 filed Passd order dated 3.8.06 that auction shall remain stayed for a period of 2 woeeks

Sri Ravindra Singh The WP filed by the Successors of one of the partner against recovery proceeding initiated against him.

98 Bareilly 17 /2006 Puspa Chaturvedi VS UPFC (J.P. Nursingh Home Moradabad

125.00 filed Sri Ravindra Singh WP filed by the mortgager of collateral security security not to initiate recovery proceeding against colleteral security. The factual position provided to RO Allahabad with copy of agreement.

99 Bareilly 18 Appeal 570/1996

Saraswati Woolen Mills Ltd Ranikhet (Almora (Official Liquidator)

30.00 filed Office of R.O.C.Kanpur High Court Allahabad passed order dated 20.11.2004 directing OL to transfer the case to Uttarakhand High Court alongwith company case No. 3 of 1991 in the matter of M/s Saraswati Woolen Mill Ltd both the case have been transferred to Uttarakhand as recall application against the order has been filed by the petitioner which is still pending before the Hon'ble High court allahabad

100 Bareilly 19 CA 212/ 2011

UPFC Vs Bhushan Publication Pvt.Ltd.

3.49 filed Sri Atiq Ahmed Khan, In front of High court Police Chowki, Allahabad 9335152058

The Corporation filed appeal before the Hon'ble court against the order passed by Civil Court

101 Bareilly 20 2nd appeal 58/2010

UPFC Vs Rakesh Mishra (M/s MR Chemicals Buduan)


The 2nd appeal fialed by the Corpn to stay the effect and operation of impugned judgement and decree dt 19.9.2009 passed by aDJ Buduan in Civil Appeal No. 27/06 Rakesh Mishra VS UPFC & ors shall remain stayed

13

102 Bareilly 21 35907/12 M/s Naurang Singh & Sons General Mills & Others VS UPFC


WP filed to quash the Revoery proceeding of the Corporation.

103 Bareilly 22 38655/ 2013

Rani Textiles Vs UPFC 0.00 filed Sri Nripendra Mishra 19, Tashkand Road, Civil Lines Allahabad Mob.9415214375

WP filed against the rejection of amendment application

104 Bareilly 23 4387/2014 RK Ice & Chilling Plant Buduan & ors VS UP & Ors


The WP filed against recovery proceedings of Corporation

105 Bareilly 24 1943/2014 Ajendra Pal Singh Vs State of UP & Ors (M/s V.R. Products, Pilibhit)


The WP filed against recovery proceding of corporation

106 Bareilly 25 2599/2015 Sandeep Rice Mill Pvt.Ltd. Sahjahanpur Vs UPFC


The petitioner has filed WP against restoration filed in the lower court Sahjahanpur

107 Bareilly 26 1812/2001 Ramesh Chandra Gupta VS UPFC (M/s Gupta Synthetic & Perfumers)

1.05 filed Sri Naresh Pant, 254, Cheena Khan Lane, Talli Tal, Nainaital 9411167564

After sale of land and building,Cpron issued PRC borfrower moved High Court against PRC

108 Bareilly 27 338/2006 Himalayan Footwears Pvt.Ltd. & Ors VS UPFC & ors (Sri Narain Singh, Balwant Singh Govind Singh & Narain Singh Bhaisora)

8.20 filed Sri Naresh Pant, Nainital Corporation issued PRC , party filed WP against the recovery action

109 Bareilly 28 FAFO / 727/2000

Jai Bhagwan Agro Pvtr.Ltd AHJhNPUE Vs UPFC


FAFO filed against the order passed by trial court on 12.05.2000 vide which stay application has been rejected. Cvil Sout at prest dismissed & communicated to Allahabad

110 Bareilly 29 1993 Singh Ice Candy, Budaun VS UPFC (Sri Raj Veer Singh)

2.64 Filed Sri Sandeep Mukherji Writ Petition filed by the party againstrecovery action. Case is pending. Assets have been sold.

111 Bareilly 30 /2006 Kushal International Ltd., (U.P. Lime Chemical Ltd. Bijnor)

0.00 Filed Sri Ravindra Singh 9889288999

This is a sale account of U.P. Lime.The sale amount approved by the purchaser but sale deed could not be executed for want of sale deed could not be executed for want of No dues certificate of PICUP. Moreover PICUP has requested to Sub Registrar of properties not to accept the sale deed for registration until PICUP issue. No dues Certificate. The prayer of purchaser is to execute sale deed.

112 Bareilly 31 1324/ 2001

UPFC Vs. M/s Ashoka Rice Mill (Sri Ashok Kumar Batra, Smt. Sita Rani & Amarjeet Batra)

0.00 Filed Sri Manoj Kumar Saxena The present writ petition has been filed by the Corporation for quashing the order passed by ADJ. Baeilly. The Civil Suit has been decided.

14

113 Bareilly 32 7235/2008 M/s Bareilly Textiles Pvt. Ltd. Bareilly VS UPFC

10.26 Filed Sri Gautam Baghel 9225109266

Revoery certificate issued by the Corpn. Against guarantor and collatgeral security mortgaged to the Corporation. RC returned on pretextg that Khasra number has been changed in chakbandi proceeding and advised to issue fresh RC

114 Bareilly 33 FAFO/379/ 199

UPFC Vs. M/s SandeepRice Mill Pvt. Ltd. Shjahanpur

0.00 Sri Nripendra Mishra 19, Tashkand Road, Civil Lines Allahabad Mob.9415214375

FAFO filed by the Corporation in Hon'ble High Court and thereafrer assets sold u/s 29. Original suit has dismissed as default and an application for restoration of case has been filed by the plentiff in civil court. Status of FAFO could not be ascertaianed by the counsel for want of courft file of Hon'ble High court.

115 Bareilly 34 41122 /2006

M/s Jai Bhagwan Agro Pvt. Ltd. Sahjahanpur VS state & others

0.00 Filed Sri Gautam Baghel 9225109266

Case filed by one other person on behalf of company claiming him as MD in the company and sought relief from the court to run the unit. Counter Affidavit has been filed by the Corporation.

116 Bareilly 35 241444 /2002

Sartaj Khan VS state of UP & others (M/s Bhadauria Laghu udyog Rampur


Writ petition filed by the purchaser challenging the order passed by Board of Revenue dated 2,3,2003 setting aside the auction. Hon'ble court vide its order dated 14.6.02 directed the petitioner shall not be disosed from the land in dispute.RO Allahabad is requested for listing the case.

117 Bareilly 36 21572/90 M/s Raj Cement Company Ltd. VS State (Sri Ajit Dhawan, Sri RN Dhawan Sri Ratan Kapoor

0.00 Filed Sri Naresh Pant, 254 cheena Khan Lane, Talli Tal, Nainital

FIR has been lodged with crime No. 20/2002 u/s406 and 379

118 Bareilly 37 WP No. 1369/2001

Bank of Baroda Vs Distt Judge & others (Radha Krishna Rice Mill) (Sita Ram Singhm Rajiv Kumar, Ganesh Singh, Smt. Shashi Devi


Assets of the unit sold u/s 29 of SFCs Act. Sale proceed has been deposited by the purchaser OTS of one partner approved and amt. received. PRC against remaining partners issued

119 Bareilly 38 0011/2009 Jahmohan Bagadwal Vs. State of Uttarakhand & others


It is a PIL & Corporation has filed its counter affidavit

120 Bareilly 39 237/2002 Mohd. Ahmed Vs. Board of Revenue & others (M/s Naveen Vastra Udyog)


Petition has filed by the auction buyer challenging the order of Board of Rev. dated 19.4.02. The Revenue Board bas set aside the order of Commissioner Moradabad dated 6.8.99 rejecting the objection filed by the borrower's son under section 285(1).

121 Bareilly 40 FAFO Vijay Kumar Vs. Anees Ahmad vs Kavita Chemicals Pvt.Ltd.


FAFO has been arised against the order passed by A.D.J. (SD) Binjor on 18.5.2006 in OS No. 369/05 thereby rejected the application .

15

122 Bareilly 41 FAFO 3121/2007

UPFC Vs Smt. Saroj Gupta & others ( S.R. Trading Co. Bareilly


FAFO has been filed by the UPFC against the order pssed by the ACJ-IV Bareilly on 16.07.2007 vide which the corporation restrained for peaceful possession of plentiff. FAFO is pending for its adjudication.

123 Bareilly 42 CR 366/02 Sri Digvijay Tandon Vs. UPFC & others ( A.N. Cement (P) Ltd.


The order passed by ADJ, XIV Moradabad dated 17.8.2002 rejecting the amendment application of plentiff on OS No.10/99 pending at District Court Moradabad has been chalalaenged in the present revision

124 Bareilly 43 CR 367/02 Sri Digvijay Tandon Vs. UPFC & others ( A.N. Cement (P) Ltd.


The order passed by ADJ, XIV Moradabad dated 17.8.2002 rejecting the amendment application of plentiff on OS No.10/99 pending at District Court Moradabad has been chalalaenged in the present revision

125 Bareilly 44 CR60/2011

Rani Textile Vs UPFC 0.00 Filed Sri Nripendra Mishra 19, Tashkand Road, Civil Lines Allahabad Mob.9415214375

Party filed civil revision in the Hon'ble High Court against order passed by ADJ III Buduan

126 Bareilly 45 15543/2013

UPFC Vs OBC (M/s Chaudhary Agro processors Ltd. Sahjahanpur

0.00 Filed 9889288999 Corporation has filed WP against the Order of DRAT vude which the DRAT passed the order to remit the auction amount to OBC. The court has been passed the interim order on 19.3.2013 to keep the aucion amount in FDR,

127 Bareilly 46 90/2013 Mukesh Kumar Mittal Vs UPFC (Agarwal Products Bazpur

0.00 Filed Sri Naresh Pant,254, Cheena Khan Lane, Talli Tal, Nainital

We have recveived the appeal from HO and sent to counsel for putting the appearance

128 Bareilly 47 First appeal 357/2013

Arvind Singhal Vs UPFC(Hotel Him & Hotel Raj), Kausanai, Bageshwar

0.00 Filed Sri Naresh Pant,254, Cheena Khan Lane, Talli Tal, Nainital

Party filed first appeal in the Hon'ble High Court against judgement of decree granted on 19.9.2011

129 Bareilly 48130 Bareilly 49 Nil/2015 Arun Prakash Srivastava

Vs state of UP & others 0.00 Filed Sri Ravindra Singh

9889288999Writ Petition filed by the party to to direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondant No.3 i.e Tehsildar to record the naame of petitioner in Khatauni.

131 Bareilly 50 00/1989 Kumar Oil Mill Vs UPFC 0.00 Filed Account of the party has been closed.132 Bareilly 51 00/1994 Shanker Minerals &

Mineral Power Works, Sahjahanpur

0.00 Filed Sri Ravindra Singh9889288999

Account of the party has been closed.

133 Bareilly 52 2306//1985

UPFC Vs Duke canning 0.00 Filed Account of the party has been closed.

134 Bareilly 53 00/1991 UPFC Vs Khanna Fashion, Sahjahanpur

0.00 Filed Sri Ravindra Singh 9889288999

Account of the party has been closed.

135 Bareilly 54 00/1991 UPFC Vs Rishna Murari Lal (Kiran Oil Mill, Bareilly

0.00 Filed Account of the party has been closed.

136 Bareilly 55 00/1993 UPFC Vs Parvesh Kumar Khanna (Skylard Offset, Bareilly


16

137 Bareilly 56 926/2004 UPFC Vs Srhi Agresen Rice Mill, Bareilly


138 Bareilly 57 00/1991 Vinod Nath Kapoor Vs Distt. Judge


139 Bareilly 58 FAFO1994

UPFC Vs Kailash Singh (Sri Ksirhna Sugar Inds)


140 Bareilly 59 Contempt 1994

Mahesh Chandra Vs Civil Judge


141 Bareilly 60 Contempt 2000

Sanjeev Kumar Vs Ashok Khurana & ors. ( Durga Steel Inds, Bijnor)


142 Bareilly 61 20515/ 2002

M/s Alka Cereal Products Pvt.Ltd. Vs Collector & ors


143 Bareilly 62 00/1992 Modern Rice Mill Vs UPFC 0.00 Filed OTS of one partner approved. Amount received. Remaining partgners are being located

144 Bareilly 63 00/1992 Gyan Printers VsUPFC 0.00 Filed OTS of one partners has been approved. Remaining are being pursued.

145 Bareilly 64 686/2001 UPFC Vs U.P. Lime Ltd.,Bijnor

57.63 OTS has been approved and entire OTS amount received

146 Bareilly 65 FAFO687/2001

UPFC Vs Organics Ltd. 240.00 Account has been settled under OTS.

147 Bareilly 66 1903/2001 Smt. Rekha Vs RM, UPFC (Rekha Ice Factory

0.00 Filed OTS has been approved and entire

148 Bareilly 67 782/2003 Balwinder Singh & another VS UPFC & other (Kulwant Singh Bareilly


149 Bareilly 68 00/2008 Naveen Kumar Gupta Vs State & ors (Rajeev Flour Mills, Sahjahanpur


150 Bareilly 69 CR 14/2001

UPFC Vs Sri Desh Bandhu Agarwall & Ors. (Shiva Rice Mills, Bijnor)

0.00 Filed The revision is restoreed to its original No. which order passed on 22.11.2013

151 Ghaziabad 1 W.P. No. 7219/2006

Asha Textiles (P)Ltd. Vs Union Bank of India & others

18.40 01.03.2006 SH. Ateeq Ahmad Khan MOB.NO.9335152058

Hon'ble High Court has stayed recovery proceeding of the Corporation vide its order dated 01.04.2006 i.e."in view of the letter dated 7th Feb.2006 sent by the State Govt. filed as Ann.-5 AI to the suplementry affidavit shall remain stayed". Stay vacation application file. As per website of High Court last listed on 29.01.2016 and now the case is to be list on 12.04.2017

17

152 Ghaziabad 2 W.P. No. 40818/2013

Rakshit Chemical Indus. Ltd. Vs. UPFC


Hon'ble High Court vide order dated 31.07.2013 stayed the recovery proceeding i.e."subject to petitioner depositing 10% of the amount as claimed by the respodent Corporation within two weeks the Corporation shall not create any third party right". There is interim stay and compliance of order done by the petitioner. Expedite application has been prepare by the Counsel for filing before the Hon'ble Court. As per website of High Court case was last listed on 15.07.2015 and there is no further order of listing.

153 Ghaziabad 3 W.P. No. 40820/ 2013

Ankit Polymers (P)Ltd. Vs. UPFC


Hon'ble High Court vide order dated 31.07.2013 stayed the recovery proceeding i.e."subject to petitioner depositing 10% of the amount as claimed by the respodent Corporation within two weeks the Corporation shall not create any third party right". There is interim stay and compliance of order done by the petitioner. Expedite application has been prepare by the Counsel for filing before the Hon'ble Court. As per website of High Court case was last listed on 15.07.2015 and there is no further order of listing.

154 Ghaziabad 4 W. P. No. 13322/13

Krishna Kanhaiya Alias Kanhaiya Lal & Another Vs. UPFC & others ( M/S K.N. Bhardwaj & Sons)

0.05 Filed Staty order dt. 21.03.2013 against PRC

Sri. Gautam Baghel 09335109266

This WP filed by the petitioners against Notice dt. 01.02.2013 issued by the Court of Asstt. Collector Grade-II, Karol Bagh, New Delhi on the R.C. issued by the Corporation for a sum of Rs. 1,27,191/-. The Hon’ble High Court passed stay order on 12.03.2013 i.e. “In the meantime no further action shall be taken in pursuance of notice dt. 01.02.2013.” C.A. has been filed. As per website of High Court, case was last listed on 11.04.2013 and there is no further order for listing.

155 Ghaziabad 5 W. P. No. 57792/2014

R.K. Extrusion Vs. State of UP & Others

0.00 Filed Stay order 31.10.2014 SH. Ateeq Ahmad Khan MOB.NO.9335152058

Unit sold, PRC issued to recover the balance dues. Vide order dt. 31.10.14 Hon’ble Court stayed the Recovery proceedings. Counter Affidavit has been filed. As per website of High Court, case was last listed on 26.05.2015 and there is no further order for listing.

156 Ghaziabad 6 FA No. 436/13

Vipin Jain Vs State of UP & others ( M/S Eagle Ceramics (P)Ltd.)

Filed 02.04.2014 SH. Ateeq Ahmad Khan MOB.NO.9335152058

Hon’ble High Court has stayed the recovery proceedings of the Corporation on the basis of UNIQUE BUTYE & S. CHANDRA case vide order dt. 02.04.2014 till the next date of listing. i.e. “Recovery proceedings, if any, initiated against the appellant shall remain stayed.” As per website of High Court this case was last listed on 09.01.2015 and there is no further order for listing.

18

157 Ghaziabad 7 W.P. No. 43347/2001

M/S Eagle Ceramics (P)Ltd.

27.64 Filed Sri. Gautam Baghel 09335109266

Unit already sold u/s-29 of SFC’s Act. Counter Affidavit has already been filed on behalf of Corporation. As per website of High Court this case was listed on 25.05.15 & there is no further order for listing. Hon’ble High Court has connected this writ with Writ No. 41220/11. No monetary involved

158 Ghaziabad 8 W.P. No. 48738/2003

R.P.Vaishya Vs State of UP & Others (M/S Eagle Ceramics (P)Ltd.)

Filed Sri. Gautam Baghel 09335109266

Unit already sold u/s-29 of SFC’s Act. Counter Affidavit has already been filed on behalf of Corporation. Previously this case was listed on 25.05.2015 and no further date of listing is shown on the website of High Court. Hon’ble High Court has connected this writ with Writ No. 41220 of 2011. No monetary involved.

159 Ghaziabad 9 W.P. No. 52080/2003



Unit already sold U/s-29 of SFC’s Act. Counter Affidavit has already been filed on behalf of Corporation. As per website of High Court this case was listed on 25.05.15 & there is no further order for listing. Hon’ble High Court has connected this writ with Writ No. 41220/11. No monetary involved.

160 Ghaziabad 10 W.P. No. 41220/2011



Unit already sold u/s-29 of SFC’s Act. Counter Affidavit has already been filed on behalf of Corporation. As per website of High Court, this case was listed on 25.05.2015 & there is no further order for listing. No monetary involved.

161 Ghaziabad 11 Iind appeal 451/2003

UPFC Vs Shyam Sunder Sharma ( Bharat Gen. Mills)

1.50 Filed Sri. Gautam Baghel 09335109266

This case relates to the owner of the lease hohd property, period of which has expired now. The proprietor of the unit already expired. C.A. has already been filed. On the request of Legal Heirs of the Prop., Corporation approved OTS for Rs. 2.00 lacs and an amount of Rs. 1.10 lacs has been paid by the Legal Heirs. Previously this case was listed on 06.11.2003 and there is no order for listing. PRC of legal heirs of proprietor have been issued.

162 Ghaziabad 12 W.P. No. 41994/2001

Sri. Mahavir Ji Enterprises Vs. UPFC

Filed SH. Ateeq Ahmad Khan MOB.NO.9335152058

Previously this case was listed on 27.07.2016 and now this case is to be listed on 07.02.2017. No monetary involved.

163 Ghaziabad 13 FA No. 604/2008

Singhal Wood Industries, Hapur Vs UPFC & others

7.16 Filed SH. Ateeq Ahmad Khan MOB.NO.9335152058

Hon’ble High Court Allahabad has vacated stay order vide order dt. 06.08.2013. Borrower has settled their account under OTS for Rs. 155.241 lacs and a sum of Rs. 39.00 lacs has been paid by the party against OTS. As per website of High Court this case was listed on 23.08.2013 and there is no further order for listing. No monetary involved.

19

164 Ghaziabad 14 CMWP No. 16735/2014

Sachchey Singh & Other Vs. UPFC & others ( M/S Indu Plaastic)


The petitioner is a purchaser of Collateral Security furnished by the borrower M/s Indu Plastics for securing the loan advanced by the Corporation to the borrower. As per website of High Court this case was listed on 13.02.2015 and there is no further order for listing. No monetary involved.

165 Ghaziabad 15 FAFO 1774/2008

K.L. Steel Vs. Smt. Veerbati & others ( Ghaziabad Oxygen Gases (P)Ltd. )


The instant FAFO filed by the Appellant against the order of Commissioner (WCA) Dt. 23.03.2007. Appellant is the purchaser of Sick Unit from the Corporation i.e. M/s Ghaziabad Oxygen Gases (P) Ltd. Previously this case was listed on 31.10.2011 and no further date of listing is shown on the website of High Court. No monetary involved.

166 Ghaziabad 16 W.P. No. 66937/2008

Malayaj Garg Vs. U.B. India & others


Previously this case was listed on 21.01.2009 and no further date of listing is shown on the website of High Court. No monetary involved.

167 Ghaziabad 17 Cr. Appli 36216/2010

Nirmala Jain Vs. State of UP & others ( Ormi Textiles )

SH. Ateeq Ahmad Khan MOB.NO.9335152058

The instant criminal application was filed by the applicant one of the partner/promoter of the firm against criminal proceedings of case No. 589 of 2009, State Vs. Pramod Kmar Jain & Others on the FIR lodged by the Corporation against all the partners of the firm and charge sheet No. 40 of 2007 submitted by the police authorities U/s 406 IPC in case crime No. 207 of 2006. As per website of High Court this case was listed on 16.05.2016 and further to be listed on 02.05.2017. No monetary involved.

168 Ghaziabad 18 WP No. 27339/2008

Shiv Kumar Vs. State of UP & others ( Vardhman Oil )


The instant WP was filed by the petitioner against the recovery action initiated by the Corporation. As per website of High Court this case was listed on 10.12.2008 and there is no further order for listing. No monetary involved.

169 Ghaziabad 19 FA 457/2005

Swastik Plywood & Allied Indus. Vs. State of UP & others


This FA was filed by the Appellant before the Hon’ble H.C. against the order dt.15.01.2005 passed by Civil Judge (S.D), Ghaziabad in O.S. No. 1230/1998. Previously this case was listed on 11.07.2007 and no further date of listing is shown on the website of the High Court. No monetary involved.

170 Ghaziabad 20 Cr. Appli. 5499/2002

Smt. Annimaka Vs. State of UP & others ( Helix Pharma )

118.72 This Cr. Application was filed against the action of FIR as case Crime No. 10/2001. As per website of High Court this case was listed on 29.11.2010 and further is to be listed on 19.07.2017. No monetary involved.

171 Ghaziabad 21 W.P. No. Nil/1988

Smt. Nirmala Jaitly W/o Dharamveer Jaitly ( Godson Bakeries)

No detail about this writ petition is available with law department R.O. Ghaziabad. No monetary involved.

20

172 Ghaziabad 22 W.P. No. 10483/2007

UPFC Vs. Addl. Labour Commissioner UP GZB (Sri. Achhe Lal ) (A.K.Board Mill)

It is a labour dispute matter. The case has been recalled by the Hon’ble High Court. Previously this case was fixed on 05.12.14 and there is no further order for listing.

173 Ghaziabad 23 W.P. No. 10692/2007

UPFC Vs. Addl. Labour Commissioner UP GZB (Sri.Bajrangi Tiwari) (A.K.Board Mill)

It is a labour dispute matter. Previously this case was listed on 09.05.2007 and no further date of listing is available on the website of High Court, Allahabad.


AIMS India (P)Ltd. Vs. Shyama Charan Metal, UPFC & Others

Against the judgment of lower court, Gzb. Petitioner filed this W.P. Previously this case was listed on 15.11.2016 and no further date of listing is available on the website of High Court, Allahabad.

175 Ghaziabad 25 CMWP 2882/2009

Parmatma Saran Sharma Vs. State of UP& Others

R.C. against which this petition filed has been returned by R.A. unexecuted on the ground that no property is available in the name of the petitioner. In view of above development the W.P has become in fructuous, however party has done OTS with the Corporation on 24.09.10 for Rs. 1.20 lacs & the party has deposited entire amount of OTS with the Corpn. R.O. Allahabad has been provided relevant documents received from R.A. & OTS in order to move application before Hon’ble High Court for dismissal of pending writ. No Dues Certificate is to be issued. The promoter has since expired.


Parwar Engg. VS. UPFC SH. Ateeq Ahmad Khan MOB.NO.9335152058

The O.S. No. 677/1992 itself has been dismissed by the Lower Court on 18.01.95. On this basis application before the High Court has already been moved on 16.08.95, dismissed. This FAFO has become infructuous. There is no detail available on the website of High Court in respect of this FA.F.O.Infructuous case.

177 Ghaziabad 27 WP 39549/2003

Phool Ice Factory Vs. Collector, GZB

Nil Sri. Gautam Baghel 09335109266

This WP was filed to stay the realization of 10% collection charges from the petitioner in pursuance of citation dt. 25.01.2003. OTS done and amount paid by the petitioner. Previously this case was listed on 04.05.2016 and now this W.P. is to be listed on 18.01.2017. (DISPOSED).Infructuous case.

21


UPFC Vs. Singhal Wood Industries

Nil SH. Ateeq Ahmad Khan MOB.NO.9335152058

Corpn. has filed this FAFO on 28.01.2000 against the order dt. 26.10.99 passed by the Lower Court. High Court granted absolute stay. Later on H.C. vide order dt. 06.08.2013 vacated the stay order earlier granted in FA No. 604 of 2008, Singhal Wood Inds. Vs UPFC & Ors. As per website of High Court, there is no further order for listing. Although this case has been transferred to Lower Court/Tribunal by the Hon’ble High Court.Infructuous case.

179 Ghaziabad 29 WP 62430/2010

Sukhbir & Others Vs. State & Others ( Jai Ganesh Sugar Mills)

Nil Sri. Gautam Baghel 09335109266

Petitioner has settled their account with UPFC under OTS. As per website of High Court case was last listed on 15.11.2010 and there is no further order of listing. Infructuous case.Infructuous case.

180 Gorakhpur 1 9119/ 2008

Ashok Kumar V/S U.P.F.C. and others (M/S Gupta Engineering Works )

0.00 C.A. Filed

No order passed Gautam Baghel 9335109266 [email protected]

The Writ Petition has been filed against disputed of DADP amount.

181 Gorakhpur 2 38287/2003

Atma Ram Khetan Vs DM. Gorakhpur (M/S Purvanchal Chawal Udyog )

0.00 C.A. Filed


Writ Petition has been filed against impounding of sale deed on the ground of deficiency of stamp duty.

182 Gorakhpur 3 2014 Bhagirathi V/S State of U.P. & others ( M/s Maa Durga Mini Rice Mill, Gorakhpur

3.00 C.A. Filed

No order passed Pranjal Mehrotra 9453011277

W.P. was filed by the petitioner for settlement of OTS

183 Gorakhpur 4 54777/ 08 Bridhi Oil Mill (P) Ltd. V/S UPFC and others

107.87 Copy of C.A. not in file


Narrative along with brief facts has already been sent to R.O., Allahabad to file C.A.

184 Gorakhpur 5 598/83 Kanpur Sugar Works Vs. UPFC

10.00 C.A. Filed

No order passed Sri R.P. Mishra IIIrd party Writ Petition

185 Gorakhpur 6 14124/05 Durga Textile Vs. UPFC. 0.00 C.A. Filed


186 Gorakhpur 7 FAFO – 2005

Golden Cold Storage and Ice Factory V/S Mohd. Umar Khan and others

24.72 C.A. Filed


This FAFO was filed against the order dated 27.04.2005 of ACJ, Basti with the prayers to direct the respondent no to eliminate and transfer the property in dispute. No order has been passed.

187 Gorakhpur 8 72482/2005

Kashi Prasad Dwivedi Vs UPFC (M/S Ganesh Dall Mill, Basti )

3.88 C.A. Filed


It is Writ against order of dismissal of revision by the District Judge, Basti to allow the amendment application .

188 Gorakhpur 9 29376/2006

M/S Purvanchal Chawal Udyog V/S State of U.P.

1.36 C.A. Filed


This is writ of mandamus commanding corporation to permit the petitioner to sell the assets of the firm to enable the petitioner to clear the balance loan amount under OTS.

22

189 Gorakhpur 10 69071/2009

Ram Sakal Pasi V/S State of U.P. and others

0.00 C.A. Filed No order passed Gautam Baghel 9335109266 [email protected]

M/S R.K. Bulb one of the our financed unit in which R.C. was issued in the year 1979 by the Corporation. The unit was auction by R.A. in favour of Ram Sakal Pasi for a sum of Rs. 2.02 Lac. Corporation has filed objection in the court of Commissioner Gorakhpur Division, Gorakhpur against auction and requested to Tehsildar, Mau for not confirmation the sale. In the meantime borrower approached the Corporation for OTS and Corporation has approved OTS in favour of the Borrower. Now the borrower has deposited total amount of OTS. Party has also deposited collection charges with R.A. and Corporation has issued No Dues Certificate in favour of the Borrower. The account has been closed in the year 1992. Now Ram Sakal Pasi has filed W.P. in Hon’ble High Court requestred that to confirm the sale in his favour. We are sending brief facts of this case to R.O., Allahabad to filed C.A.

190 Gorakhpur 11 75596/2011

Ravi Prakash Goel V/S State of U.P. (M/S Bridhi Oils (P) Ltd., Khalilabad, Sant Kabir Nagar )


Sri Ravi Prakash Goel, one of the Director of the company has requested before Hon’ble High Court that other Director of the company is not cooperate to him so that he wants to settle the balance dues ¼ individual capacity. C.A. filed. .

191 Gorakhpur 12 65810/09 M/S Seema Bakers V/S UPFC and others


The partners of firm has filed W.P. in the Hon’ble High Court for consideration the OTS 10% Simple Interest . The brief facts of the case sent to R.O. Allabad to filed C.A

192 Gorakhpur 13 FAFO No. 111/ 2012

Smt. Krishna Devi V/S V/S UPFC and others ( M/S Mahendra Nath Carbon Industries, Deoria )


Smt. Krishna Devi has filed suit bearing no. 320 /96 against the Corporation in the Court of CJ(SD), Deoria requesting therein that she is bonafied owner of the property . Collection, Deoria sold the mortgaged property in execution of RC of UPSEB. The said dismissed and default by the Court in Deoria. Smt. Krishna Devi has approached Hon’ble High Court and the case has been foxed pm 15.03.2012. The brief facts already sent to RO, Allhabad.

193 Gorakhpur 14 25256/02 Shree Ram Inds V/S UPFC and others


The Writ Petition was filed to stay the operation of Recovery proceeding initiated in persuation to citation. No order passed. Unit sold by the Corporation.

23

194 Gorakhpur 15 2379/2006 Ramesh Chandra Srivastava V/S UPFC (M/S Popular Enterprises, Deoria )


The Writ is against the Collection charges demanded by the Collector , Deoria in the RC issued by Corporation and which was subsequently withdrawn. The Hon’ble High Court stayed the recovery of the collection charges vide order dated 13.01.2006 provided petitioner deposit security other than cash or bank guarantee before collector Azamgarh within one month. The said unit sold by the Corporation U/S Section 29 of SFC’s Act in favour of purchaser.

195 Gorakhpur 16 40578/2007

Triloki Nath V/S State of U.P. & others (Madheshiya Ice Candy )


W.P. filed to stay the operation of order dated 25.08.2003 passed by C.J. (Sr. Div.) Gorakhpur in O.S. No. 859/ 2003 & order dated 04.08.2007 passed by A.D.J./ Spl. Jude (E.C. Act) Gorakhpur in Misc. Appeal No. 32/2003 & with pray also not to release the from the house in question. High Court has directed on 29.08.2007 that till next date of listing the disputed amount will not be recovered from the petitioner. C.A. filed.

196 Gorakhpur 17 FA 470/2000

UPFC Vs. Aslam Parvej ( S.P. Traders )


This FAFO has been filed to stay the operation of recovery. C.A. filed. High Court has passed order issue notice, meanwhile the operation of the impugned order dated 24.08.1995.

197 Gorakhpur 18 FAFO 953/1995

UPFC VS Mahendra Singh ( Singh Dall Mill )

0.00 C.A. Filed No order passed Sri V.M. Sahai The F.A.F.O. has been filed to stay the operation of recovery.

198 Gorakhpur 19 14490/1993

Anil Kumar Jaiswal Vs. State of UP. ( Anil Printing Press )

0.00 C.A. filed No order passed A.K. Gaur OTS done.

199 Gorakhpur 20 53628/2010

Brahmanand Singh V/S State of UP (M/S Babbal Plastic )

5.81 C.A. filed No order passed Gautam Baghel 9335109266 [email protected]

OTS done and total OTS amount received with part of DADP in meantime Corporation has cancelled the OTS benefit given by the Corporation.

200 Gorakhpur 21 14490/93 Anil Kumar Jaiswal Vs. State of UP. ( Anil Printing Press )


OTS Done.

201 Gorakhpur 22 11978/94 National Power Loom Society V/S UPFC

0.00 C.A. filed No order passed Sri R.P. Mishra In this case OTS was approved by the Corporation and party has paid OTS amount.

202 Gorakhpur 23 21252/94 Shashi Kumar Jaiswal ( Shashi Automobile Vs. UPFC.)

0.00 C.A. filed No order passed Sri Pradeep Kumar No dues issued, documents released. In –fructuous

203 Gorakhpur 24 257/2002 Siddhartha Modern Rice Mill V/S UPFC

23.35 C.A. filed No order passed Sri A.K. Gaur This Writ Petition was filed against the order dated 26.02.2002 passed by Civil Judge Deoria to retain the respondent from initiating any proceeding towards recovery as arrear of land revenue.

204 Gorakhpur 25 FA 422/95 UPFC Vs. Deoria Rubber Inds.

0.00 C.A. filed No order passed Sri A.K. Gaur Unit sold . OTS for balance amount approved & fully paid. In-fructuous.

24

205 Gorakhpur 26 297/ 1993 UPFC V/S Bhagwan Das and others

0.00 C.A. filed No order passed Sri A.K. Gaur Both the appear are pending for hearing FAFO No. 107 of 1990 and 297 of 1993 have been transfer to DJ on 06.09.1996 where suit is also decided hence FAFO is meaningless. Counsel has been requested to withdraw the appeal.

206 Gorakhpur 27 57580/2009

UPFC V/S Brahmaand Singh

5.81 N.A. No order passed A.A. Khan 09335152058 Corporation has filed Writ Petition against the order passed by CJ(SD), Deoria before Hon'ble High Court and Hon'ble High Court has granted stay against the said order.

207 Gorakhpur 28 FAFO 1996

UPFC V/S Sarita Paper & Starw Board Mill

0.00 C.A. filed No order passed A.K. Gaur This F.A.F.O. has been filed against the order dated 27.10.1995 passed by Addl. Civil Judge, Gorakhpur in original suit no. 680 of 1995 restraining the Corporation for possession of the unit provided the plaintiff opposite party pay a sum of Rs. 1.00 Lacs till the last date of each month from November, 1995. Unit sold out full amount received. Now the son of borrower has approached to the Corporation for OTS benefit under loss assets. OTS done and total amount of OTS along with DADP received.

208 Gorakhpur 29 FAFO 643/1987

High Industries Vs. UPFC. 0.00 C.A. filed No order passed A.K. Gaur Unit auctioned in execution of RC.OTS for balance amount approved and paid. Case in fructuous.

209 Gorakhpur 30 Criminal appeal 4859/02

Ansar Ahmad ( M/s. Galaxy Electrical Inds )V/S UPFC

1.34 C.A. filed No order passed OTS done. Major amount received .

210 Gorakhpur 31 9119/2008 Ashok Kumar V/S U.P.F.C. and others (M/S Gupta Engineering Works )


The Writ Petition has been filed against disputed of DADP amount.

211 Gorakhpur 32 14675/ 07 Arvind Kumar Pandey V/S UPFC and others (M/S Anil Printing Press, Khalilabad, Sant Kabir Nagar )


The petitioner has filed the Writ Petition against recovery action initiated U/S 29 of SFC’s Act. The son of the borrower settled loan account under OTS and paid total OTS amount along with interest thereon. Corporation has released mortgaged documents in favour of borrower. Case in fructuous.

212 Gorakhpur 33 361655/09 Ashok Kumar V/S ADJVIIth 0.00 C.A. filed No order passed Gautam Baghel 9335109266 [email protected]

This W.P. was filed against the sale of property disputed in suit No. 392 of 1984. C.A. filed

213 Gorakhpur 34 63387/2011

Gulab Singh and others V/S State of U.P. (M/S Gulab Singh Cold Storage, Gorakhpur )


The petitioner has filed W.P. before Hon’ble High Court that challenging demand notice dated 26.09.2011of Collection charges in OTS by the Corporation. The Hon’ble High Court shall remain stay the recovery of Rs. 4.50 lacs as per notice. C.A. Filed. Corporation has issued No Dues Certificate in favour of borrower and release the title documents in favour of borrower.

25

214 Jhansi 1 3115/2004 Ram Lakhan Maheshwari (M/s. Maheshari Oil Mill), Hamirpur

3.46 * The honourable Counsel has been requested for providing date of filing of C.A., fixation of date and interim order of honourable court if any in these cases which is still awaited

Sri Prashant Kumar, H.No. C - 87, Sector - H, Aliganj, Lucknow

We have visited site of the unit. The borrower promised to visit R.O., Jhansi for settlement of account under OTS.

215 Jhansi 2 44032/07 19971/08

M/s. Bhargawa Inds., Jalaun Vs. UPFC

0.00 21.04.2008 05.04.2012

-- Sri Ateeq Ahmed Khan, 29, Kanpur Road, Opp. High Court Police Chowki, Allahabad 9335152058

The land & building acquired by the Bharat Petroleum. Compensation of Rs. 697006.00 received by the Corporation.

216 Jhansi 3 58452/10 Devendra Singh & Deependra Singh, Jhansi both S/o. Late Lakhan Singh Vs. State of UP & Others (M/s. Chandra Pal Yadav)


Sri Nripendra Mishra, 19, Tashkand Marg, Civil Lines, Allahabad 9415214375

Corporation issued Recovery Certificate 11.05.2010 against the guarantors. Legal heirs of one guarantor has filed writ. Now OTS was approved for Rs. 5.60 lacs in Jan., 2014. Legal heirs is paying OTS amount.

217 Jhansi 4 29193/10 M/s. Ashok Dal & Oil Mill, Hamirpur Vs. UPFC

9.77 * * Sri Nripendra Mishra, 19, Tashkand Marg, Civil Lines, Allahabad 9415214375

We are persuing the case for vacation of stay. Party has submitted OTS proposal, which is under consideration at H.O.

218 Jhansi 5 6977/07 M/s. Trimurti Textiles, Jhansi Vs. State of UP & Others

3.77 02.05.2007


Corporation sold the mortgaged proprty. The borrower has expired recently. Writ is pending. We have issued R.C. against guarantors. Auction proceedings have been initiated by R.A. but later on RC returned by RA in the month of Sept., 2012.

219 Jhansi 6 5722/2014 M/s. Kabra Handmade Paper Inds., Kalpi, Jalaun Vs. District Magistrate & Others



PRC issued on 11.12.2013. Party has filed writ against PRC. Writ is pending at Hon'ble High Court, Allahabad.

220 Jhansi 7 14031/2014

M/s. Rakhi Steel Inds., Jhansi (Composit Loan Vs. State of U.P.)



R.C. issued against the property of Sri Kamta Prasad S/o. Sri Ram Bharosey R/o. Jarar, Naraini, Banda.

26

221 Jhansi 8 9012/2015 Anil Kumar Jain V/s. 1. U.P. through Principal Secretary Industries, U.P. Lucknow 5. UPFC (M/s. Aone Alums (P) Ltd., Lalitpur)

-- * The honourable Counsel has been requested for providing date of filing of C.A., fixation of date and interim order of honourable court if any in these cases which is still awaited


Anil Kumar Jain filed a writ petition against D.M., Lalitpur and 05 respondent including UPFC for cancellation of alloted plot no. F-5, Industrial Estate, Chandera, Lalitpur

222 Jhansi 9 20742/02 Ashok Kumar Gupta, Banda (M/s. Om Shanti Pipe Inds.) Vs. D.M. Banda & Others

1.32 22.05.2008


The land & building of the unit has been sold by the Corporation, after sale of land & building. PRC was issued on 08.02.2002, RA attached the house of Sri Ashok Kumar Gupta. Sri Gupta partner of the firm filed a Civil Misc. W.P. No. 20742/2002 before Hon'ble High Court Allahabad and obtained a stay against confirmation of sale of his house. The Hon'ble High Court has passed an order on 03.01.2003 that auction held on 27.12.2002 shall not be confirmed till the next date of listing. We personally contacted to brrower at his residence on 06.10.2010 for settlement of account under OTS but he was not agreed.

223 Jhansi 10 69781/2011

M/s. S.R. Tyre & Tubes (P) Ltd., Jhansi Vs. UPFC & Others



Counter sent to R.O., Allahabad on 18.01.2012. RA returned the PRC on 13.08.201.

224 Jhansi 11 71316/11 M/s. Santosh Printing Press, Jhansi

1.37 04.03.2012

-- Sri Nripendra Mishra, 19, Tashkand Marg, Civil Lines, Allahabad 9415214375

Counter has been sent to R.O., Allahabad on 03.02.2012 for early vacation of stay order. PRC returned by R.A. on 13.08.2012.

225 Jhansi 12 74636/10 M/s. Maa Sharda Oil Mill, Jhansi Vs. State of UP & Others



We are persuing the case to vacate the stay. PRC returned by R.A.

27

226 Jhansi 13 453/2015 M/s. Ajanta Tourist Home, Banda. State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, U.P., Lucknow

0.04 11.03.2015

The honourable Counsel has been requested for providing date of filing of C.A., fixation of date and interim order of honourable court if any in these cases which is still awaited

Sri Pradeep Raje, C - 263/9, Rajaji Puram, Lucknow, U.P. 9335210467

State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, U.P., Lucknow stay infavour of UPFC against DCF, Banda order dated 26.07.2014 to issue No Dues Certificate to the party.

227 Kanpur 1 WP No. 3734/92 (RO Etawah)

Nirmal kr Agarwal V/s UPFC ( M/s Nirmal kr. Jain Etawah, a case of SRTO)

1.15 C.A. filed. Shri Ateek Ahmad Khan, Phone No. 2560943, Address: 29/39, kanpur Road, Opposite G.T. Road, Main Gate, High Court Stadium, Near Police Chowki, Allahabad

Hypothecated truck auctioned by RA for Rs. 49,967/- on 13.2.89 & Rs. 42,380=00 received from Insurance Co. PRC was issued against the borrower and its guarantor against which present WP filed by the borrower. A conditional order dt. 14.2.92 not complied by petitioner.

228 Kanpur 2 FAFO No. 220/92 (RO Etawah)

UPFC V/s State of UP and othrs (M/s Flexo pack Inds Etawah )

-- C.A. filed. Shri Ateek Ahmad Khan, Phone No. 2560943, Address: 29/39, kanpur Road, Opposite G.T. Road, Main Gate, High Court Stadium, Near Police Chowki, Allahabad

The present FAFO has been filed against the order dt. 25.11.91 passed by CJ/Ist ACJM Etawah in OS No. 257/91 staying the RC issued by the Corp. on 25.2.89 OTS approved for Rs. 6.20 lac vide letter dt. 31.3.02 against which Rs. 6.20 lac received against OTS . Paid upto 8.7.07 but DADP yet to pay. Relief appn. has been rejected. Appn pending at HO ( Case under infructuous )

229 Kanpur 3 FAFO No. 27/93

UPFC V/s Praveen kmr Misra (M/s Hotel Shivoy, Kanpur )

-- C.A. filed. Shri S.K. Srivastava, Mobile No. 9415360528, Chamber No. 18, High Court, Associated Hall, Allahabad

Injunction was granted by lower court against including present FAFO has been filed. Lower court order has not been stayed by HH Court, stayed by lower court in suit no. 322/92. CA filed.

230 Kanpur 4 wp No. 52733/04

Krishna Mohan Tandon V/s State of UP & othrs (M/s Perfect Handtools, Hamirpr)

-- C.A. filed. Shri S.S. Singh, Mobile No. 9315351453, Address: K.O.-41,Ekanki Kunj Colony, 24 Meer Road, Allahabad.

Filed to quash the PRC dt. 26.8.04 CA filed.


UPFC V/s Mittu plastic product (P) Ltd, Kanpur Dehat.

-- C.A. filed. Shri S.K. Srivastava, Mobile No. 9415360528, Chamber No. 18, High Court, Associated Hall, Allahabad

This FAFO has been filed against the order dt. 25.10.2000 at lower court staying recovery action. No favourable order has been passed to stay the order dt. 25.10.2000. CA filed.


UPFC V/s M/s Vigo Food processors Products, Kanpur.

56.90 C.A. filed. Shri S.K. Srivastava, Mobile No. 9415360528, Chamber No. 18, High Court, Associated Hall, Allahabad

The said order has been stayed by HHC vide order dated 7.5.01 and unit sold.

28

233 Kanpur 7 WP. No. 31228/99

M/s Katiyar Dall Mill Kanpur V/s UPFC


Conditional order not complied by petitioner. OTS proposal alongwith EM. Received . Caseunder process . (Unit sold )

234 Kanpur 8 CMWP. No. 17146/02

Govind prasad Gupta V/s UPFC (M/s Gee Key pipes (P) Ltd. K(D)


Unit sold. PRC issued against which this writ. Unique Butyle case.

235 Kanpur 9 WP No. 48738/02 (RO Etawah)

Kishore Food product Auraiya & Others V/s UPFC and others.

1.90 Shri Ateek Ahmad Khan, Phone No. 2560943, Address: 29/39, kanpur Road, Opposite G.T. Road, Main Gate, High Court Stadium, Near Police Chowki, Allahabad

WP No. 12902/02 filed against sale of mortgaged assets of unit had been dismissed on 11.5.04 . After sale of unit PRC issued on 8.1.02 for recoveryof Rs. 36.34 lacs. The HHC vide order dt. 15.11.02 directed that if petitioner deposit Rs. 12.00 lac within one month proceedings forrecovery ofamt. in persuance of citation dt. 17.10.02 shall remain stayed. Petitioner failed to deposit the said amt. as directed by the court.

236 Kanpur 10 CMWP No. 43148/02 (RO Bly )

Raj kumar singh Bhadoria & othrs V/s UPFC and othrs (Trimurti pipes (P) Ltd, Kasipur Distt. US Nagar )

18.87 Shri S.K. Srivastava, Mobile No. 9415360528, Chamber No. 18, High Court, Associated Hall, Allahabad

WP has been filed to quash theRC and to accept OTS.


UPFC V/s Ashok Gupta and othrs (M/s Krishna Fertilizers, Kanpur )

-- Shri S.K. Srivastava, Mobile No. 9415360528, Chamber No. 18, High Court, Associated Hall, Allahabad

FAFO was filed against the order dt. 16.1.04 passed by Learned Ivth Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate/ Addl. Civil Judge Sr. Div. Kanpur Ngr in OS No. 1228/03 . As per HHC order dt. 9.4.04 status quo is being maintain. (Unit sold.)

238 Kanpur 12 CMWP NO. …/05 (RO Etawah )

Smt. Radha Rani V/s State of UP & othrs ( Guarantor Mortgagor of M/s Shiv Nath Singh Semfex Fkbd )

4.43 Shri Ateek Ahmad Khan, Phone No. 2560943, Address: 29/39, kanpur Road, Opposite G.T. Road, Main Gate, High Court Stadium, Near Police Chowki, Allahabad

Writ was filed by the Guarantor of M/s Shiv Nath singh to escape herself from the recovery of the Corpn. Claiming that he had never taken the guarantee of the loan . CA filed.

239 Kanpur 13 WP No. 32538/10

Misri Lal jaiswal V/s PICUP and othrs (M/s Sushila pulp and paper , Hamirpur)


Unit with O.L.

29

240 Kanpur 14 WP No. 9907/02, 19568/04 and 32274/05

M/s Ram charan steels ltd, Orai V/s State of UP and others.


a. The writ is filed by guarantor on the ground of protection available u/s-22 SICA. Stay granted by HHC on 19.7.02 . Case under BIFR. (b.) Stay granted on the basis that UPFC proceeded without consent of other secured creditor, Case under BIFR. ( C ) Unit under possession by UPFC under SFC's Act since 2005.

241 Kanpur 15 CMWP No. 12345/06

Girdhari lal Tiwari V/s State of UP and othrers (M/s Sushila pulp and paper mills, Hamirpur.)


Unit with O.L.

242 Kanpur 16 WP No. 32680/06

Narendra kmr Agarwal V/s UPFC and othrs (M/s Veenus loha udyog, Orai )

Shri S.K. Srivastava, Mobile No. 9415360528, Chamber No. 18, High Court, Associated Hall, Allahabad

a. Petitioner is guarantor of M/s Veenus loha Udyog. Writ filed against RC issued against petitioner. Order dt. 20.6.06 b. Unit is in possession with UPFC U/s-29 of SFC's Act, advertisement released but no offer received. No stay against prime assets. CA filed.

243 Kanpur 17 WP No. 55509/06

Tuf pack Inds V/s UPFC and others.


Unit sold. PRC being issued.

244 Kanpur 18 WP No. 34618/06

Ajai kirti Dalmia V/s UPFC (M/s Gemini electro chem. Orai Jalaun )


Stay against PRC granted on 6.7.06 on the basis of Unique Butyle case to maintain the status quo as of today with respect of property of the petitioners in question. No stay against prime assets. CA filed.

245 Kanpur 19 CMWP No. 44521/07 (RO Etawah )

UPFC V/s State of UP and othrs (M/s Shiva oxide, Etawah )


WP filed by UPFC for quashing the auction proceeding conducted by District Magistrate Etawah. In favour of State Govt. for Rs. 1.00 lac of property mortgaged to the Corporation. CA filed.

246 Kanpur 20 2nd appeal no. 124/10

Smt. Noor jahan V/s State of UP and othrs, (M/s Royal bone mill , Kanpur )


Iind appeal has been filed by the wife of the borrower against the order dated20.10.09 of ADJ Kanpur Ngr rejecting the appeal no. 121/07 . CA filed.

247 Kanpur 21 WP No. 7432/11

Smt. Mithlesh sachan and othrs V/s State of UP & othrs (Kshipra oil Mills Kanpur )


To quash the RC dated 9.12.10 and not to take coercive action. CA filed.

248 Kanpur 22 WP No. 12777/11

Dr. Dharmendra singh V/s State of UP and others (M/s Patara chem. Kanpur )


To quash the RC. Dated 9.12.10 issued against the petitioner and to recover the amt. from the assets of the Co. and not recover the amt. from the personal properties of the petitioner.

30


M/s Patara chem. Inds, Kanpur V/s UPFC


FAFO filed against the order of lower court rejecting the plaint as the proper court fees not paid. The delay condonation appln is yet to be heard and decided by HHC.

250 Kanpur 24 WP No. 16180/11

M/s Annapurna polypackers, Kanpur V/s UPFC and others.


Writ has been filed to quash the proceedings initiated U/s-29 of SFC's Act. (Unit sold and sale deed executed ) CA filed but possession yet not taken by UPFC.


UPFC V/s UP Alloys Ltd, Hamirpur.


Against the injuncjtion order dt. 26.9.11 of lower court present FAFO filed. HHC has stayed the operation of the order of lower court in favour of the Corpn. CA filed.

252 Kanpur 26 WP No. 71111/11

M/s Kuswaha palace, Kanpur V/s State of UP and others.

--- Shri S.K. Srivastava, Mobile No. 9415360528, Chamber No. 18, High Court, Associated Hall, Allahabad

Only recovery citation dated 16.11.11 stayed on 9.12.11 . OTS approved by the Corporation.

253 Kanpur 27 WP No. 3973/12

Smt. Srimati Devi V/s UPFC (M/s Gupta and sons, Kanpur.

--- Shri S.K. Srivastava, Mobile No. 9415360528, Chamber No. 18, High Court, Associated Hall, Allahabad

Recovery notice dt. 19.7.11 issued by us stayed. CA filed.

254 Kanpur 28 WP No. 34321/12

Sri Jasram singh V/s UPFC and others (M/s Raj pipe factory, Etawah )


RC stayed. CA filed.

255 Kanpur 29 WP No. 66706/12

M/s Raj pin mfg co. Kanpur and others V/s State of UP and others.


WP filed for quashing the RC and the citation issued in pursuance thereof.

256 Kanpur 30 WP No. 10703/12

Kanpur Fertichem Ltd, Unnao and others V/s State of UP and others.


For quashing the notice dt. 14.6.11 issued to settle the balance liajbilities and to decide the representation . Unit sold.

257 Kanpur 31 WP No. 16885/13

M/s Klans woollen mills Kanpur and another V/s UPFC and others.


Writ for settlement under OTS scheme.

258 Kanpur 32 WP No. 18596/13

M/s Roman concrete cement Kanpur V/s state of UP and others.


Writ for OTS on lower side.

31

259 Kanpur 33 CM stay appl.no…./13 in WP No. 41728/2000

Smt Mamta singh and another V/s UPFC and others (M/s SuryaHosiery, Kanpur)


Writ against OTS.

260 Kanpur 34 CMWP No. 27834/14

Mohd. Sami V/s State of UP and others (Purchaser of M/s Prince leather and finishers, Kanpur )


Writ for execution of sale deed.

261 Kanpur 35 FA No. 87/92

UPFC V/s Gupta cold storage, unnao.

14.36 This FA has been filed against the order dt. 29.5.92 of Civil judge Unnao vide which suit no. 222/90 was decreed. Party is being called for negotiation for settlement of dues as the dispute was regarding charge of higher interest rate. Rstoration application filed.

262 Kanpur 36 WP No. 626(MS)/ 1996

UPFC V/s Board of Revenue and others (M/s Indamau Modern rice mill Unnao )

4.82 This WP has been filed by UPFC challenging the order dated 10.10.95 of Board of Revenue Lko accepting the revision of auction purchaser , but the litigation cell Lucknow was informed to provide the present status of the case.

263 Kanpur 37 WP( MB) No. 13050/11

Ramesh chandra Nishad V/s UPFC and others (M/s TP Packaging purchaser of M/s Sood and co. Unnao )

1.43 WP has been filed for quashing the RC and not to recover the amount HHC vide order dated 23.12.11 stayed the citation subject to deposit of Rs. 3.00 lac on or before 27.12.11 but petitioner has not paid the same.

264 Kanpur 38 WP No. 9286/02

Radhey shyam singh V/s State of UP and others (M/s Mahadeo safe works , Kanpur )

5.03 Order dated 4.3.02 stayed the recovery proceeding and instructed to take the appropriate decision on petitioner proposal of OTS for which a sum of Rs. 0.70 lac deposited as token money stated in petition. The fact is that OTS was already approved much earlier andcommunicated to party vide letter dated 7.02.02but party failed to deposit OTS instalments and did not deposit any amt. against OTS except token money. Hence the RC was issued which was challenged in the present writ.

265 Kanpur 39 WP No. 24413/02 ( FAFO No. 515/95)

Dr. MAW Rizvi V/s UPFC and others (M/s Klans woollen mills (P) Ltd, Kanpur

29.36 Petitionerchallanged RC issued by the Corpn, by invoking personal guarantee of director. HHC vide its order dt. 9.9.02 stayed the auction of the attached property . CA filed on behalf of the Corpn. Unit in possession since 1997 , status quo.

266 Kanpur 40 WP No. 11703/06

Radhey shyam Dwivedi Kanpur V/s State of UP and others ( SRTO)

1.76 HHC Vide order dated24,2,06 stayed the PRC.

32

267 Kanpur 41 WP No. 126M/s Prince Leather & Finish --- Order dated 12.3.07 no recovery action be taken against the petitioner provided the petitioner deposit a sum of Rs. 2.00 lacs within a period of 2 months. In case of default stay application shall stand rejected. Since party has deposited the desired amt. within schedule. CA filed . Letter sent to RO Alld for vacation of stay.

268 Kanpur 42 WP No. 102M/s National soap and chem 2.46 Writ dismissed on 5.8.13 and petitioner reopened the writ.

269 Kanpur 43 WP No. 38 Sigma wire Inds Kanpur V/s 19.16 Recovery has been stayed on the basis of decision of Unique Bkutyle case. CA filed.

270 Kanpur 44 CMWP No. Sri Rajeev Pathak and anoth 1.15 For quashing the recovery proceeding vide order dated 19.1.12 HHC directed that in case petitioner deposit Rs. 25000=00 within one month, the recovery shall remain stayed. The conditional order to deposit Rs. 25000=00 has been complied.

271 Kanpur 45 Total 58.92272 Kanpur 46 CASES ST BY DISTRICT COURT.273 Kanpur 47 Suit No. 32 Praveen kmr Misra V/s UPF 2.63 WS / objection jfiled. FAFO No. 27/93 has been

filed before HHC Alld by UPFC but operation of order of lower Court has not been stayed. In jview of above it is proposed to withdrawn the FAFO filed by UPFC.

274 Kanpur 48 Suit No. 37 M/s Som Electro mechanica 38.96 WS/objection filed. Revision No. 519/95 dismissed on 30.5.12

275 Kanpur 49 Suit No. 28 M/s Mittu Plastic Kanpur D V 46.04 WS/Objection filed. FAFO No. 126/01 has been filed before HHC Alld by UPFC, but operation of order of lower court has not been stayed.

276 Kanpur 50 Suit No. 25 Mohd. Idrish V/s UPFC (M/s 0.82 WS/ Objection filed . FAFO No. 220/92 filed by UPFC before HHC against the order dt. 25.11.91 of lower court, but operation of order has not been stayed by HHC. In mean time the RC was returned back therefore the case is infructuous.

277 Lucknow 1 1508/2007 Progressive Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. & Others

C.A. filed -- Prashant Kumar, Mobile No.9839009858, 3rd Floor, Cyber Height, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow [email protected]

Case is pending before the Hon’ble High Court

278 Lucknow 2 2463/1991 Ansar Spinning Mill Vs. UPFC & Others, Sitapur



33

279 Lucknow 3 4689/08 V.C. Industries V/s State of U.P.& Others

C.A. filed -- Prashant Kumar, Mobile No.9839009858, 3rd Floor, Cyber Height, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, [email protected]


280 Lucknow 4 508/98 I.S.R. Packaging (P) Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. & Others



281 Lucknow 5 Mata Santoshi Flour Mill Vs. UPFC & Others



282 Lucknow 6 1820/2010 Boxes India V/s UPFC & Others



283 Lucknow 7 -----/----- Wariyam Singh V/s Priya Biscuit V/s UPFC & Other

C.A filed -- Prashant Kumar, Mobile No.9839009858, 3rd Floor, Cyber Height, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow [email protected]

Case is pending before the Honble High Court

284 Lucknow 8 2287/ 2014

Fortuna Foundation Engg.& Consultant V/s UPFC & Others

C,A, filed -- Prashant Kumar, Mobile No.9839009858, 3rd Floor, Cyber Height, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow [email protected]

Case is pending before the Honble High Court.

285 Lucknow 9 8706/1992 Gupta Cold Storage Unnao V/s UPFC

C,A, filed -- Prashant Kumar, Mobile No.9839009858, 3rd Floor, Cyber Height, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow [email protected]

Case is pending before Honble High Court

286 Lucknow 10 1872/2003 Pukhraj Rubber Inds. M/s Mehjabeen V/s DM UPFC

C.A, filed --- Prashant Kumar, Mobile No.9839009858, 3rd Floor, Cyber Height, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow [email protected]


34

287 Lucknow 11 9501/2007 Bhagwati Saran Trivedi V/s State of UP M/s Nav Durga Ganga Rice & Dall Mill

C,A. filed --- Prashant Kumar, Mobile No.9839009858, 3rd Floor, Cyber Height, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow [email protected]


288 Lucknow 12 51/2000 Sterling Hide V/s State of UP

C.A. filed Prashant Kumar, Mobile No.9839009858, 3rd Floor, Cyber Height, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow [email protected]


289 Lucknow 13 23/2005 Gupta Spun Pipe Inds, V/s UPFC &Others



290 Lucknow 14 4315/2002 Dharmendra Pratap Singh V/s UPFC M/s Laxmi Taxtile Allahabad



291 Lucknow 15 1025/96 Vishal Packging V/s UPFC & Others Ghaziabad

C,A. filed Prashant Kumar, Mobile No.9839009858, 3rd Floor, Cyber Height, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow [email protected]


292 Lucknow 16 4673/2001 Global Diamonds (P)ltd V/s UPFC Noida



293 Lucknow 17 -------/2006

Rajeev Tyagi V/s State of UP M/s Tilak Engg. Corporation

C.A, filed Prashant Kumar, Mobile No.9839009858, 3rd Floor, Cyber Height, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow [email protected]


294 Lucknow 18 3123/2003 Amitabh Tayal V/s UPFC Dehradun



35

295 Lucknow 19 Appeal No. 39/2015

Rasauli Cold Storage V/s MD UPFC



296 Lucknow 20 Nil /2015 Eggro Paper Mould Ltd. V/s Appellate Authority AAIFR, New Delhi



297 Lucknow 21 Nil /2015 Eggro Pulp & Paper Ltd. V/s Appellate Authority AAIFR, New Delhi



298 Lucknow 22 Nil /2015 Smt Shobhna |Sharma & Others V/s State of UP M/s Kanchan Inds Bareilly,

C.Ai Filed

Prashant Kumar, Mobile No.9839009858, 3rd Floor, Cyber Height, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow [email protected]


299 Lucknow 23 4679/2006 AmitBhardwaj Vs Board of Revenue

C.A.Filied

Prashant Kumar, Mobile No.9839009858, 3rd Floor, Cyber Height, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow [email protected]


300 Meerut 1 11956/89 BHATI PLASTIC,BSR V/S UPFC

0.00 FILED SH. RAVINDRA SNGH MOB.NO.9889288999

UNIT AUCTIONED BY R.A. AND PRC ISSUED. UPFC HAS FILED EXPEDITE APPLICATION. C.A. FILED.

301 Meerut 2 FA-/89 UPFC V/S ROSHAN LAL BSR

0.00 FILED DO THIS APPEAL IS PENDING BEFORE THE HO'BLE HIGH COURT . THE CONSEL OF THE CORPN. HAS BEEN REQUESTED TO EXPEDITE THE CASE AT THE EARLIEST.

302 Meerut 3 FAFO 69/96

KONIKA POLYMERS,MRT V/S UPFC DATE OF FILING 30.01.96

0.00 FILED DO UNIT SOLD BY R.A. PRC ISSUED. THE APPLICANT HAVE FILED THIS FAFO AGAINST THE ORDER OF LOWER COURT REJECTING TEMPORARY INJENCTION C.A.FILED.


UPFC V/S STEEL KRAFT TUBE INDS. MEERUT DATE OF FILING 22.2.99

0.00 FILED DO THIS W.P. WAS FILED BY UPFC TO STAY OPERATION OF ORDER DATED 23.11.98 OF ACJM, MEERUT. THE COURT HAS PASSED THE ORDER DATED 23.2.99. ADMIT ISSUE NOTICE. UNIT SOLD.

304 Meerut 5 FAFO 591/2001

SHRI BAJRANGBALI CHEMICALS V/S UPFC DATE OF FILING 27.04.01

0.00 FILED DO THIS FAFO WAS FILED TO QUASH THE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER DT. 10.01.01 PASSED BY IV ACJ, MRT AND TO ALLOW THE APPLICATION OF THE APPEALLENT.

36


UPFC V/S M/S BONANZA INDIA MRT. DT. OF FILING 21.3.01

322.00 FILED DO NO DUES CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN ISSUED AND ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS HAS BEEN RELEASED . THE CASE IS INFRUCTUOUS. OTD DONE

306 Meerut 7 FA1076/03

D.S.BOARD INDS. MRT. DT. OF FILING 18.11.03

48.00 FILED DO UNIT SOLD U/S 29 PARTY WAS CONTACTED FOR OTS BUT THEY MOVED AN APPLN. TO HC AGAINST RECOVERY. TWO PARTNERS ARE STAYING OUTSIDE AND SERVING IN PAPER MILLS AT NASIK AND WAPI. THISW.P. IS AGAINST THE ORDER DT. 28.07.2000 PASSED BY CJ, COURT, MRT.

307 Meerut 8 2ND APPL.514/03

SHABAZ KHAN VS STATE (KUNWAR POTTERIES, BSR)DT.OF FILING 28.4.03

0.00 FILED DO THE APPEAL WAS FILED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DT. 26.02.03 PASSED BY ADJ, BSR & 30.3.82 PASSED BY ACJ, BSR. C.A. FILED ON 29.08.03

308 Meerut 9 415/03(WRUT TAX)

SHAKTI GLASS TECH. BSR. V/S UPFC DT.OF FILING 11.03.03

0.00 FILED DO RC ISSUED . W.P. AGAINST TRADE TAX RECOVERY

309 Meerut 10 FAFO 1590/04

SMT. PUSHPA GUPTA V/S UPFC (SACHCHIDANAND YOGESHWAR SARAN,MRT. DT.OF F. 27.5.04

1.69 FILED DO THIRD PARTY WRIT. THE UNIT HAS BEEN SOLD TO MADAN MOHAN GUPTA WHO HAS BEEN EXPIRED. THE PETITIONER IS WIFE OF SR. MADAN MOHAN GUPTA. THIS W.P. FILED AGAINST THE ORDER DT. 26.2.04OF ADJ, MRT. HC. STAYED OPERATION OF ORDER.

310 Meerut 11 26100/06 MEERUT INDS. LTD.DOF. 9.5.06

0.00 FILED DO UNIT SOLD PERSUING FOR BALANCE LIABILITIES. THIS W.P. WS FILED AGAINST SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMOF INTT. SUBSIDY UNDER T.U.F. SCHEME BY SCHEME OF CENTRAL GOVT. THE CASE IS INFRUCTUOUS. OTS DONE.

311 Meerut 12 /06 DOOAB EXIM PVT. LTD MRT VS UPFC

0.00 FILED DO THE PETITIONER IS GUARANTOR OF M/S MEERUT INDS. LTD.,C.A. FILED. THE CASE IS INFRUCTUOUS. OTS DONE.

312 Meerut 13 58311/06 NARESH CHAND V/S UPFC M/S TIRUPATI MILK CHILLING PLNT BSR DOF 17.10.06

2.98 FILED DO PURCHASE ROF THE UNIT HAS FILED THIS W.P. AGAINST CANCELLATION OF SALE C.A. FILED.


M/S SUBHASH TEXTILE &PTD.MRT. V/S UPFC DOF 3.11.06

0.00 FILED DO

314 Meerut 15 49745/07 ASHOK KR. V/S STATE AND ORS. M/S SHAKTI OIL MILLS BSR DOF 4.10.07

5.05 FILED DO THIS W.P. FILED BY THE PURCHSER OF THE UNIT. THE AFORESAID W.P. IS AGAINST THE R.A. AND THE UPFC IS PARTY ALSO.

37

315 Meerut 16 34314/08 NIKHIL AGARWAL V/S STATE OF UP & ORS. m/S SAHAS CEMENT (P) LTD, MRT DOF 15.7.08

14.13 FILED DO THE W.P. FILED BY THE THIRD PARTY WHO HAS PURCHASED THE PROPERTY OF M/S SAHAS CEMENT (P) LTD, WITHOUT CONSENT OF THE CORPN.

316 Meerut 17 2009 M/S MEERUT INDS. MRT. V/S TEXTILE COMMISSIONER & UPFC AND ORS.

0.00 FILED DO THIS W.P. FILED BY PETITIONER AGAINST TEXTILE COMMISSIONER AGAINST CLAIM OF SUBSIDY. THE CASE IS INFRUCTOUS. OTS DONE.

317 Meerut 18 64791/09 OM PAL SINGH V/S STATE OF UP & ORS M/S UJALA ICE FY. BSR

1.16 FILED DO THIS W.P. FILED BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST THE AUCTION OF THE UNIT.

318 Meerut 19 61930/09 SINGH STEEL FURNITURE V/S STATE OF UP, BSR.

3.73 FILED DO THIS W.P. FILED BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST THE ORDER OF ADJ. DT. 09.10.09 & ADJ (SD) BSR. DT. 06.08.09 AND AGAINST ISSUENCE OF R.C.

319 Meerut 20 WP 363/11

VIKAS INDS. MERT. VS. STATE OF UP & ORS. DOF.04.01.11

0.00 FILED DO THE WP FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO STAY AND OPERATION OF ORDER DT. 21.09.10 PASSED BY STATE LEVEL INTER INSTITUTIONAL COMMITTEE MEETING . THIS WP IS FILED AGAINST THE SETTLEMENT OF REH. PACKAGE.

320 Meerut 21 WP362/11 PAHWA RUBBER INDS. MRT. V/S STATE OF UP& ORS. DOF 04.01.11

0.00 FILED DO THE WP FILED BY THE PETIIONER TO STAY AND OPERATION OF ORFDER DT. 21.09.10 PASSED BY STATE LEVEL INTER INSTITUTIONAL COMMITTEE MEETING.

321 Meerut 22 FOFA 278/12

RAM KISHAN V/S DAYAL CHAND (M/S DESH POLYMET, MERT.)DOF 30.04.12

0.00 FILED DO WP FILED BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST THE ORDER DT. 2.5.12 OF ACJ(SD)MRT. THE CASE IS INFRUCTOUS. OTS DONE.

322 Meerut 23 WP 55709/12

AMZAD V/S UPOFC M/S TECHNICOS, MRT. DOF 17.10.12

1.80 FILED DO THIS W.P. FILED BY THE PURCHASER SHRI AMZAD AGAINST CANCELLATION OF SALE OF PLANT AND MACHINERY.

323 Meerut 24 AP.38/12 UPFC V/S RAJ RANI M/S DEEWAN TYRES,MFT. DOF 21.1.13

0.00 FILED DO THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE CORPN. AGAINST ORDER DT. 5.10.12 OF V ADJ(SD)MRT. IN SUIT NO. 267/06. HHC GRANTED PARTIAL STAY ON 6.5.13.

324 Meerut 25 CIVIL REV. 551/12

M/S S.K. TEXTILES &ÔRS. V/S PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS. DOF 16.10.12

0.00 FILED DO THIS CIVIL REVISION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST THE ORDER DT. 20.07.12 PASSED BY ACJ(SD),MRT.

325 Meerut 26 8266/06 AMIT BANSAL V/S STATE OF UP& ORS. M/S ACME INDS. LTD

0.00 FILED DO THIS WP FILED BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST THE RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS AND CONNECTED WITH WP NO. 69753/05.

326 Meerut 27 8502/02 ASHOK KR. V/S UPFC M/S SHINE WIRE PVT. LTD(RECALLED)DOF 25.02.02

278.54 FILED DO THIS WP HAS BEEN FILED AGAINST RC. CA HAS BEEN FILED . CASE HAS RECORDED AFTER D.D.

38

327 Meerut 28 FAFO1886/2000

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA V/S GOLD STAR DOF 22.12.2000

515.00 FILED DO THIS WP WAS FILED AGAINST ORDER DT. 16.12.2000 OF SECOND ACJ (SD) MZN. ÏN OS NO. 642/2000 THIS FAFO HAS BEEN FILED BY THE PETITIONER. IN THIS CASE SHORT CA ON BEHALF OF UPFC FILED ON 16.01.01.

328 Meerut 29 FAFO /1991

HAYAT ALI RANA V/S UPFC M/S ROOP PLASTIC INDS.

2.53 FILED DO THE ASSETS OF THE UNIT HAVE ALREADY BEEN SOLD U/S 29THE PARTY FILED THIS FAFO AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT THE CA OS THE CORPN FILED. NO INTERIM RELIEF WAS GRANTED TO APPELLANT.

329 Meerut 30 53514/02 KHUSHAL POLYMERS V/S UPFC &ORS (RECALLED)DOF 11.12.02

63.01 FILED DO WP HAS BEEN FILED AGAINST RC. CASE WAS TEKEN UPON 16.12.02 AND ONLY ARREST OF PETITIONERS WERE STAYED TILL 28.02.03. CA FILED.

330 Meerut 31 1082/93 MAA GAYATRI ROLLER FLOUR MILLS V/S UPFC

0.00 FILED DO EARLIER SISTER CONCERN OF THE COMPANYHAD FILED A WP AGAINST THE CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ANX. I OF S.A.AND REQUESTED THE COURT TO PASS INSTRUCTION TO CORP. TO RELEASE OF DISB. AGAINST SANCTIONED LOAN. THE SAID WP WAS DISPOSED OFF BY THE HHC BY GIVING INSTRUCTIONS TO DISPOSE OF THE PARTIES REP. WITHIN TWO MONTHS. ACCORDINGLY CORPN. HAS DECIDED THERIR REP. AND ALSO RELAXED CERTAIN CONDITIONS. BUT THE PARY PILED WP . EXPEDITE APPLN. HAS BEEN MOVED BY CORPN.

331 Meerut 32 2000 MOHD. FAZIL V/S SPL. JUDGE M/S ALIA STEELS

1.00 FILED DO WP WAS FILED AGAINST RC WITH THE PRAY TO STAY THE OPERATION OF ORDER DT. 20.01.2000 PASSED BY SPL JUDGE, MZN. VIDE WHICH AN APPEAL NO. 236/98 FILED BY THE PETITIONER WAS DISMISSED BY DJ ON 24.06.98

332 Meerut 33 11057/02 NAVNEET KR. GARG V/S UPFC M/S SHINE WIRE

238.54 FILED DO THE WP WAS FILED AGAINST CITATION DT. 2.3.02

333 Meerut 34 25793/9 SAMEER ISPAT V/S PICUP

38.37 FILED DO THIS CASE WAS TAKEN UPON 25.6.99 AND COURT HAS DIRECTED TO LIST FOR ADMISSION AND ALSO TOFILE CA . CA HAS BEEN FILED.

334 Meerut 35 CR.P.5388/2000

SANJAY KR. TAYAL (KALIKA ENTP.

3.15 FILED DO THIS CR. WP U/S 482 ARRISES OUT OF THE ORDER DT. 19.8.9 PASSED BY THE ACJM-i IN THE APPLICATION NO. 117/90 AND PRAYED TO STAY THE OPERATION OF TH EORDER 19.8.99. CA FILED.

335 Meerut 36 CR. 123/98

TAYAL RUBBER PVT. LTD V/S PNB & ORS

51.45 FILED DO CIVIL REVISION FILED AGAINST PNB, C.A. FILED.

39


UPFC V/S ASHOKA LAMINATES AND ORS

26.00 FILED DO THIS FAFO HAS BEEN FILED BY UPFC AGFAINST ORDER OF ACJ (SD)MZN.24.12.98.

337 Meerut 38 FAFO716/95

UPFC V/S KAMRAN STEEL PIPES

40.00 FILED DO THE CORPN. HAS FILED THIS FAFO AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT ORDER DT. 31.5.95 PASSED BY CJ, MZN. THE HHC HAS STAYED THE OPERATION OF ORDER DT. 31.5.95 TILL FURTHER ORDER.

338 Meerut 39 FA209/07 UPFC V/S GOLD STAR STRAW PRODUCTS

0.00 FILED DO FA FILED ON BEHALF OF UPFC WITH THE PRAY TO ALLOW THE FA AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUNGED JUDGEMENT DT. 27.3.07 AND DECREE DT. 5.4.07 PASSED BY ADJ, MZN. IN OS NO. 201/01.


UPFC V/S MZN. POLYPLAST PVT. LTD

15.75 FILED DO THIS FAFO HAS BEEN FILED BY UPFC AGAINST ORDER DT.16.1.99 OF DISSTT. COURT MZN. THE FOLLOWING ORDERS WAS PASED ON 27.3.99. ISSUE NOTICE TO THE RESPONDENTS FIXING A DATE IN THE WEEK COMENCNG FROM 3.5.99 IN THE MEETNG OPERATION OF THE ORDER DT. 16.1.99 OF THE COURT BELOW SHALL REMAIN STAYED. THE INTERIM ORDER WILL OPERATE TILL 15.5.99 UNLESS VACATED.

340 Meerut 41 CR. 123/98

UPFC V/S PRATAP CONTINENTAL

0.00 FILED DO CASE RELATED WITH FAFO NO. 307/98 UPFC V/S PRATAP CONTINENTALHHC ALLOWED REVISION NO. 450/98 VIDE ORDER DT. 12.01.99 . BUT CEFRTIFIED COPY OF ORDER WAS SENT BY OUR COUNSEL AFTER EXPIRY OF 15DAYS WHICH HAS BEEN FIXED BY THE COURT FOR WHICH GROUND LOWER COURT REJECTED OUR APPLICATION.


UPFC V/S RAIS STEEL INDS.

14.76 FILED DO THE CORPN. HAS FILED THIS FAFO AGAINST THE ORDER 31.5.95 OF CJ, MZN. THE HHC HAS GRANTED STAY IN FAVOUR OF THE CORPN. DT. 31.5.95.

342 Meerut 43 CR. 727/03

UPFC V/S SARDAR NANAK SINGH M/S GOLD STAR STRAW PRODUCTS

267.34 FILED DO CR. HAS BEEN FILED BY UPFC WITH PRAY TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF ADJ, MZN. DT. 09.07.03 PASSED IN OS NO. 201/01 M/S GOLD STAR STRAW PRODUCTS V/S UPFC.

343 Meerut 44 WP29201/03

UPFC V/S STATE OF UP & ORS. M/S BABA INDS.

0.00 FILED DO THIS WP WAS FILED BY CORPORATION AGAINST AN ORDER OF COLLECTOR,MZN.

40

344 Meerut 45 WP 47456/09

INTERNATIONAL KRISHI UDYOG V/S BOARD OF REVENUE

19.38 FILED DO UNIT WAS AUCTIONED AGAINST RC FOR RS. 2.764 LACS WHICH WAS OBJECTED BY UPFC BUT TEHSIL AUTHORITY DID NOT CANCEL THE AUCTION AGAINST WHICH REVISION WAS FILED BY UPFC BEFOR COMMISSIONER SAHARANPUR WHICH WAS REJECTED . PETITIONER FILED REVISION BEFORE BOARD OF REVENUE LUCKNOW WHICH WAS REJECTED.THEREFORE, THE PRESENT WP HAS BEEN FILED.

345 Meerut 46 WP3421/11

BONANJA FOOD PVT. LTD V/S UPFC

0.00 FILED DO WP WAS FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO STAY FOR SALE CONSIDERATION.

346 Meerut 47 30695/08 ARVIND KR.V/S STATE OF UP & ORS.M/S DEE AND DEE INDS.

136.38 FILED DO THISWP HAS BEEN FILED AGAINST CITATION DT. 25.2.08.

347 Meerut 48 1992 BREJESH KUMAR V/S COLLECTOR & ORS.

66.40 FILED DO THIS WP WAS FILED AGAINST RC ISSUED AGAINST GUARANTOR. CORPN. WITHDRAWAL RC . THE WRIT PETITION IS INFRUCTUOUS.

348 Meerut 49 1988 HARI MOHAN KAPOOR V/S UPFC

1.97 FILED DO THIS WP FILED AGAINST NOTICE. OTS DONE . THE CASE HAS BEEN INFRUCTUOUS.

349 Meerut 50 CR.28109/07

MOHD. ASAD V/S STATE OF UP & ORS. M/S KUMAR GATTA MILLS

0.00 FILED DO THIS CR. MISC. APPLICATION FILED BY PETITIONER U/S 482 CRPC.

350 Meerut 51 11667/96 NAND LAL V/S UPFC m/S MODI ROLLER FLOUR MILLS

37.78 FILED DO THIS PETITIONER FILED THIS WP AGAINST CORPN.

351 Meerut 52 1988 NATIONAL AGRICULTRUAL INDS. V/S UPFC & ORS.

2.41 FILED DO THIS WP FILED AGAINST SALE U/S 29 OF SFCACT. SALE DEED HAS ALREADY EXECUTED IN FAVOUR OF PURCHASER.

352 Meerut 53 14061/08 PREM NATH ANAND V/S STATE OF UP M/S ANAND DHATU

9.51 FILED DO THIS WP FILED AGAINST SALE U/S 29 OF SFCACT.

353 Meerut 54 24242/89 SARASWATI ICE FY V/C UPFC

4.18 FILED DO PETITIONER FILE THIS WP AGAINST UPFC . CA HAS BEEN FILED ON 18.1.98.

354 Meerut 55 7699/98 SHAUKAT HUSSAIN V/S UPFC M/S DELUX RUBBER SRE

1.43 FILED DO PETITIONER FILED THIS WP AGAINST UPFC . CA HAS BEEN FILED ON 17.11.98.MORTGAGED PROPERTY AUCTIONED BY RA. OTS DONE AND PAID. CASE HAS BEEN INFRUCTUOUS.

355 Meerut 56 38111/03 SMT. DARSHANA TANEJA & ORS. V/S COMMISSIONER SRE

0.00 FILED DO THIS WP FILED TO STAY THE EFFECT AND OPERATION OF IMPUNGED ORDER DT. 8.8.03.

356 Meerut 57 27085/08 STAR HANDLOOM INDS. V/S STATE OF UP & ORS.

215.86 FILED DO WP FILED AGAINST U/S29. CA FILED.

41

357 Meerut 58 FAFO/92 SUPER CHEM PRODUCTS V/S UPFC & ORS

0.00 FILED DO DISTT. COURT REJECTED INJUNCTION APPLN. ON 31.7.92 THEREAFTER THEY FILED THIS FAFO.

358 Meerut 59 58840/07 TAZIM HASAN V/S STATE OF UP& ORS. M/S CREST CEMENT PVT. LTD

18.68 FILED DO WP FILED TO STAY RECOVERY PROCEEDING IN PURSUANCE OF THE CITATION DT. 23.11.07 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT. NO. 3.


UPFC VS SHAKUMBHARI CEMENT PVT. LTD

0.00 FILED DO THIS FAFO FILED BY UPFC AGAINST JUDGEMENT AND DECREE 20.03.2001 PASSED BY CJ (SD) SRE, IN OS NO. 36/01.

360 Meerut 61 WP 818/94

WINTEX HANDLOOM VS UPFC

0.00 FILED DO WP FILED AGAINST RC. HC PASSED STAY SUBJECT TO DEPOSIT RS. 3.50 LACS PETITIONER FAILED TO DEPOSIT. UNIT SOLD AND LEASE DEED RELEASED IN FAVOUR OF DIC ON 16.7.08. CASE SETTLED UNDER OTS.

361 Meerut 62 CMWP 33857/11

M/S STAR HANDLOOMSER AND ORS. V/S STATE OF UP AND ORS.

0.00 FILED DO WP FILED AGAINST U/S 29 ON 07.07.11. WITH DIRECTION CASE IS TO BE PUT UP WITH LATEST ACCOUNT POSITION ON 09.6.11.THE CASE WAS NOT TAKEN UP.

362 Meerut 63 FAFO/12 UPFC VS DEVENDRA KUKREJA M/S SATYA RUBBER INDS. SRE

8.00 FILED DO WP FILED AGAINST THE ORDER OF DISST. COURT DT. 03.03.12 IN SUIT NO. 717/11

363 Meerut 64 WP/12 RASHAD ANWAR SIDDIQUI VS STATE OF UP M/S AMINA PAPERS MILLS, SRE

0.00 FILED DO UNIT SOLD U/S 29 PRC ISSUED. WP FILED AGAINST QUASHING THE EXECUTION CONFIRMATION OF TRANSFER OF ASSETS ANDD TO RELEASE THE UNIT IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONER.

364 Meerut 65 WP/13 M/S SIDH INDUSTRIES, SRE VS UPFC

0.00 FILED DO WP FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR STAY OF OPERATION OF RECOVERY.

365 Meerut 66 60198/13 SUCHASH CHAND TYAGI VS STATE M/S AJAI TEXTILE.

0.00 FILED DO

366 Meerut 67 WP/14 PRAVEN CHOPRA VS UPFC M/S U.P. SPICES, SRE

0.00 FILED DO WP FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO STAY THE PROCEEDING U/S 29 OF SFC ACT.

367 Meerut 68 3444/89 K.B. PUBLICATION V/S UPFC & ORS.

0.00 SH.NARESH PANT.M.NO.9411167564

368 Meerut 69 5002/92 SHARCO ELECTRICALS ENGG. V/S UPFC

2.86 FILED DO UNIT SOLD . THE CASE BECAME INFRUCTUOUS.

369 Meerut 70 1993/FAFO

PADAM SINGH RANA VS STATE & ORS

0.00 FILED DO OTS PAID . CASE BECAME INFRUCTUOUS.

370 Meerut 71 1994 ASHA SHARMA VS UPFC (NAVEEN ENTERPRISES)


371 Meerut 72 28278/94 SKV CHEMICALS PVT.LTD V/S UPFC


372 Meerut 73 1994 WARDHAMAN FOOD PRODUCTS V/S TEHSILDAR & ORS

7.76 FILED DO

42

373 Meerut 74 7142/94 REKHA KAUSHIK(KWALITY PLASTIC UDYOG VS UPFC

0.00 FILED DO UNIT SOLD THE CASE BECAME INFRUCTUOUS.

374 Meerut 75 33011/95 G.B. SPRING PVT.LTD. V/S UPFC


375 Meerut 76 37151/95 NAIRAN SINGH NEGI VS UPFC (VISHAL COLD STORAGE


376 Meerut 77 11773/96 HOTEL ALKA V/S UPFC 0.00 FILED DO UNIT SOLD THE CASE BECAME INFRUCTUOUS.

377 Meerut 78 720/97 KULWANT GHAI V/S STATE


378 Meerut 79 16869/98 AMITABH TEXTILE MILLS LTD V/S UPFC

33.94 FILED DO OTS DONE AND PAID THE CASE BECAME INFRUCTUOUS.

379 Meerut 80 2678/98 G.B. SPRING PVT.LTD VS UPFC



BIST CONSTRUJCTION VS UPFC & ORS


381 Meerut 82 20/99 & 10/03

INDUSTRIAL BANK OF INDIA VS AMITABH TEXTILE MILLS PVT. LTD


382 Meerut 83 204/2000 KRIPA SHANKER V/S STATE & ORS (PRINTON)

4.69 DO

383 Meerut 84 146/03 UPFC VS SMT. YASMIN & ORS. APARNA ENTP.

6.25 DO

384 Meerut 85 CR.679/03 RAJESH KUMAR SURI VS STATE & ORS.

0.00 DO THIRD PARTY HAS FILED CASE.

385 Meerut 86 910/03 MAHESHWARI STEELS VS STATE & ORS.

0.00 DO

386 Meerut 87 CO.PET. 13/03

TANYA ENTERPRISES V/S MAHESHRISHI STEELS PVT. LTD & ORS.

0.00 FILED DO UNIT SOLD. THE CASE HAS BECAME INFRUCTUOUS.

387 Meerut 88 2004 QUALITY WOOLS PVT. LTD V/S UPFC

22.09 FILED DO UNIT SOLD. THE CASE HAS BECAME INFRUCTUOUS.

388 Meerut 89 1261/03 OM PRAKASH VS D.M. HARIDWAR M/S DESIGNO FAB.)

0.00 FILED DO

389 Meerut 90 15/2002 APCO PHARMA LTD VS UPFC

30.66 DO

390 Meerut 91 150/02 SUNTAX LAMPS VS UPFC

0.00 DO

391 Meerut 92 385/05 SUMP STEELS PVT. V/S UPFC (M/S VAIBHAV STEELS (P) LTD

0.00 DO

43

392 Meerut 93 FA 6/06 UPFC VS YASMIN M/S APARNA ENTERPRISES

0.00 DO

393 Meerut 94 CO.PET.2006

MAHERISHI STEELS (P) LTD V/S UPFC

0.00 DO

394 Meerut 95 1333/06 ANIL KR. TAYAL VS STATE (M/S PALM AGRO TECH. PVT. LTD

0.00 DO

395 Meerut 96 100/2004 UPFC V/S SMT. KULDAI NEGI /S MANDHATA HOTEL

0.00 DO

396 Meerut 97 APPL. 71/08

UPFC V/S GIRI RESORTS PVT. LTD

58.47 DO

397 Meerut 98 APPL 18/05

DEHRA OIL INDS. VS INSOLVANCY JUDGE AND UPFC

1.28 DO

398 Meerut 99 2009 SMT. SHASHI BALA MITTAL V/S UPFC (NAVRANG STEELS PVT. LTD.

0.00 DO


UPFC VS SHIV KR. SINGH (m/S VAIBHAV STEELS (P) LTD.)

64.94 DO

400 Meerut 101 47032/99 PRADEEP KR. VS STAMP COLLECTOR.M/S SHIPRA HOTEL)

0.00 DO

401 Meerut 102 52252/03 INDER VEER SINGH VS UPFC (M/S GIRI RESORTS PVT. LTD

0.00 DO

402 Meerut 103 CO. PT. 56/98

NAVEEN TRADING CO. V/S SHYAM LAL SPAT (P) LTD

201.64 DO

403 Meerut 104 52253/03 ASEEM KR. V/S UPFC (M/S GIRI RESORTS (P) LTD

0.00 DO

404 Meerut 105 649/09 HIMGIRI SPAT PVT. LTD VS UPFC

0.00 DO

405 Meerut 106 APPL. 52/10

KUMAR FOOD PRODUCTS OVT. LTD VS UPFC

0.00 DO

406 Meerut 107 56929/10 SHAHJAD AHMAD V/S STATE /S RIGHT STEELS (P) LTD

99.27 DO

407 Meerut 108 50680/11 RIGHT STEELS & ALLOYS PVT. LTD VS STATE & UPFC

0.00 SH ATEEQUE AHMAD KHAN M.NO9335152058

408 Meerut 109 AP.78/11 HANU MOTEL PVT. LTD VS UPFC

38.96 DO

409 Meerut 110 144/11 PNB V/S UPFC /S USHA ENTERPRISES

4.50 DO

44

410 Meerut 111 FA 75/13 UPFC V/S BUDHI RAM M/S BHAGWATI PLASTIC WORKS

1.08 DO IN THE INSTANT CASE AN ORDER DT. 28.2.13 PASSED BY LOWER COURT AND CORPN HAS FILED F.A. IN HHC NAINITAL AND STAY FOR OPERATION OF DECREE HAS BEEN GRANTED BY HHC VIDE ORDER 2.5.13 IN FAVOUR OF CORPN.

411 Meerut 112 623/2009 UMAKANT SHUKLA V/S UPFC M/S CEE KAY GARDEN PRODUCTS PVT. LTD ,DDN

0.00 DO

412 Meerut 113 45017/12 KRIPA SHANKAR SHARMA V/S STATE & ORS m/S PRINT ON

0.00 DO

413 Meerut 114 WP50/15 RAJENDRA SINGH & ORS V/S STATE OF UTTRAKHAND AND ORS. M/S VISHAL COLD STORAGE

0.00 DO WP FILED BY THE LEGAL HAIR OF LATE SHRI NARAIN SINGH NEGI AT HHC NAINITAL

414 Meerut 115 MRC 96/15 C 482(78/08

RAJNIKANT BAJPAI V/S STAE OF UTTRAKHAND M/S RUSH FOOD DDN

0.00 DO RECALLED APP.NO. 96/15 FILED BY VINOD KR. RAWAT IS ALLOWED BY HHC VIDE ORDER 22.7.15 STATING THAT THE ORDER DT. 24.6.13 WAS PASSED WITHOUT GIVING OPPORTUNITY TO RESPONDENT NO. 3 I.E. VINOD KR. RAWAT.

415 Meerut 116 WP 1839/10 SP.AP. 493/15

UPFC & ORS V/S VINOD KR AGARWAL M/S EVEREST WOOLS (P) LTD, DDN.

27.90 DO HHC NAINITAL PASSED ORDER AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER DT. 12.08.15 RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENT TO FILE ANY EXECUTION OF ORDER.

416 Meerut 117 WP 1377/11 SPL.AP. 494/15

UPFC & ORS V/S M/S EVEREST WOOLS (P) LTD

0.00 DO HHC NAINITAL PASSED ORDER AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER DT. 14.08.15 RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENT TO FILE ANY EXECUTION OF ORDER.

417 Noida 1 WP-C No. 23421/92

C.M. Computer VS UPFC 3.00 Filed Ateeq Ahmad Khan , Mobile No. 09335152058 , [email protected]

The W.P. has been dism,issed in default in default and same has been restored and case is fixed for final hearing.

418 Noida 2 WPC no. 543766/03

N.C. Bansal VS UPFC ( M/S Jersy Inds Ltd.

- filed In this case Hon'ble court has temporaily stayted the sale of collateral security

Sri Ranjeet Saxena 09415235137 09839050679 Fax- 0532-2230939

The writ filed against our PRC issued against the directors of the company after sale of unit . The Hon'ble court restrained our recovery proceeding till further order of court.

419 Noida 3 WP No. 3962/06

Balwant Singh Chan dok VS UPFC ( M/S Uttam Plastic Pv t. Ltd.

43.45 Filed The Hon'ble Court restrained our recovery proceedings till further orders.

Ateeq Ahmad Khan , Mobile No. 09335152058 , [email protected]

This WP was filed against our PRC against the directors of the company after sale of unit.

420 Noida 4 WP No.7695/06

Deepender Singh Khorana VS State of U.P. ( M/S Uttam Plastic Pv t. Ltd.)

- filed The Hon'ble Court restrained our recovery proceedings under the P.P. Public Money Recovery Act 1932.

Ateeq Ahmad Khan , Mobile No. 09335152058

This writ petition was filed by the petitioner against our PRC issued for recov ery of balance unrecovered balance liabilities.

45

421 Noida 5 24375/06 Om Pathak VS State of U.P. & Ors.

- filed Ateeq Ahmad Khan , Mobile No. 09335152058

In this case OTS has been done. The party has paid entire OTS amount.

422 Noida 6 WP NO. 43641/07

Surinder Kumar VS Statea of U.P. ( M/S N.B. Industries)

- filed The Hon'ble High Court on 12.09.07 stayed the recovery proceaedings till the next date of hearing.

Sri Dhannanjay Awasthi The Instant WP has been filed to restrained the respondent for adopting any coercive measure in pursuance of R.C. dt. 30.09.05.

423 Noida 7 WP No. 27206/08

Smt. Manju Sharma VS UPFC ( M/S Gee Aay Fashion)

25.00 filed The Hon'ble court stayed the recovery proceedings till further order of court.

Ravindra Singh 9889288999 [email protected]

This writ petion has been filed by the third party against the order of Distt. Judge , Gautam Budh Nagar.

424 Noida 8 WP No.13182

M/S Shri Triambekay Food Pvt. Ltd.

49.55 filed The Hon'ble court styed the recovery proceedings till further order of court.

Sri Dhannanjay Awasthi This writ has been filed by the original borrower against our PRC issued for recovery of balance uncovered amount.

425 Noida 9 WP No. 27845/09

Pravas c onsultant Pvt. Ltd. VS UPFC

filed The Hon'ble court vide order dated 28.05.09 stayed the proceedings of UPFC for sale cancellation.

Sri Gautam Baghel , 09335109266 [email protected]

This writ petition was filed by the purchaser for challenged the sale cancellation of UPFC.

426 Noida 10 WP no. 62326/06

Shreekant Gupta VS UPFC ( M/S Grah Sobha Kitchenwear

- filed The Hon'ble court passed the impugned order on 09.08.06 "List the case for admission against the petitioner shall remain stayed.

Sri Ateeq Ahmed Khan The instant petition was filed to stay the effect and operation of impugned order .

427 Noida 11 WP No. 17814/06

Smt. Rani Khorana Vs State of U.P. & Ors.

- filed on 31.03.06 Hon'ble stayed the recov ery proc eedings

Sri Ateeq Ahmed Khan On 31.03.06 Hon'ble High Court connect this W.P. No. 7695/06 .

428 Noida 12 W.P. No. 16406/2010

Vipin Kumar Singh VS State of U.P. & Ors.( M/S Lehri Chemicals

18.16 filed Hon'ble High Court on 13.05.10 directed that till the next date of listing the recovery proceedings against the petitioner in pursurance of the impugned citation dated 09.03.10 shall remain stayed .


This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner against our PRC issued against the director of the company for balane unrecovered amount.

429 Noida 13 W.P. No. 61106/10

D.N. Singhania VS State of U.P. & Ors.( M/S Gaurang Hosiery Pvt. Ltd.

- Sri Gautam Baghel This case has been settled under OTS . The party has paid the entire amount of OTS.

430 Noida 14 W.P. No. 62834/12

Vinay Kumar Jain VS State of U.P. & Ors.( M/S Promise Security & Credit

144.50 filed The Hon'ble High Court stayed the recovery proceedings.

Gautam Baghel This WP was filed against our PRC against the directors of the company after sale of unit.

46

431 Noida 15 WP No. 40494/13

M/S Shree Bharat Paper Udyog VS Statea of U.P. & Ors.

24.03 filed The Hon'ble High Court order on 12.08.13 that no third party right shall be created on the assets of petitionerunit.

Sri Ravindra Singh This WP has been filed by the petitioner against our recovery action U/S-29 of SFC's Act.

432 Noida 16 WP No58053/07

Ashok Kumar VS State of U.P. & Ors.( M/S N.B. Inds)

The Hon 'ble High Court on 27.11.07 stayed the recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioner


This WP has been filed to stay the effect and operation of R.C.

433 Noida 17 WP No. 68587/09

Subodh Kumar Gupta VS UPFC ( M/S Techno Roll India Pvt. Ltd.

- filed The Hon'ble High Court on 16.12.09 has directed that till further order of this court, recov eary proceedings initiated by the respondent against the petitioner in pursuance of R.C. shall remain stayed.


This WP has been filed by the petitioner against our PRC .

434 Noida 18 WP No. 45916/14

M/S Turbo Lubes & Greases Pvt. Ltd. VS UPFC

filed The Hon'ble High Court directed till the next date of listing respondent i.e. UPFC shall not create any third party right in respect of property in question.


This WP has been filed by the third party ( purchaser ) against our action U/S-29 of SFC's Act.( against our advertisement given in the news paper.)

435 Noida 19 WP No. 29663/2000

M/S Global Diamond Pvt. Ltd. VS UPFC

7.00 filed Sri Ateeq Ahmed Khan This WP has been filed against our action taken U/S-29 of SFC's Act against our advertisement given in news paper.

436 Noida 20 31421/05 M/S Amaf Fashion VS State of U.P.

0.13 filed Gautam Baghel This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner against recovery certificate.

437 Noida 21 FA No. 360/2006

B.P. Sinha VS UPFC - filed Ateeq Ahmad Khan This is appeal was filed against the order & decree dated 22.04.2006 passed by Civil Judge( S.D) Ghaziabad .

438 Noida 22 10952/01 M/S J.B.B. Fastners Pv t. Ltd.

7.23 filed Ateeq Ahmad Khan This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner against recovery certificate.

439 Noida 23 60141/05 M/S Magnum Telelinks VS UPFC

19.24 filed Ateeq Ahmad Khan This writ petition has been filed to stay every kind of action of UPFC relating to the petitioner's company. No order has been passed.

440 Noida 24 FA No. 892/01

Nand Kishore Sharma VS UPFC ( M/S Nandan Machine )

- filed Gautam Baghel The appeal has been filed by the applicant against the judgement dated 08.08.01 passed by II ACJM( S.D.) Ghaziabad .

441 Noida 25 54894/02 Ravnet Pandhi VS M.D., UPFC ( M/S Panban Furniture)

- filed Gautam Baghel Writ petition has been filed against the R.C. Only arrest of petitioner is stayed by High Court.

442 Noida 26 10992/05 M/S Subhag Video Corporation VS UPFC

- filed Gautam Baghel This writ petition has been filed to stay the arrest of the petitioner in case crime no. 15/05.

47

443 Noida 27 FA no. 353/02

M/S Varsa Sound & Ors. VS UPFC

- filed Gautam Baghel The Hon'ble High Court has passed following order execution of sale deed in favour of purchaser is stayed.

444 Noida 28 FAFO No. 759/1993

M/S Varsa Sound & Ors. VS UPFC

- filed Gautam Baghel Unit sold. Total sale consideration received.

445 Noida 29 20760/07 Vinod Trivedi VS UPFC ( M/S Agrichem Plastic Pvt. Ltd.)

- filed Ateeq Ahmad Khan This appeal was filed against the order dated 16.04.2005 passed by ADJ , G.,B. Nagar in original suit no. 33/2004. No order has been passed.

446 Noida 30 46406/06 M/S Jackarso Packaids Pvt. Ltd. VS UPFC

- filed Ateeq Ahmad Khan This WP was filed by the original borrower for return of surplus sale consideration after sale of the unit.

447 Noida 31 42527/08 Khusi Ram Sharma VS State of U.P. ( M/S A.R.S. Plastics Pvt. Ltd.

8.59 filed Gautam Baghel This writ petition filed by third person i.e. purchaser of collateral security situated at Motipur, New Delhi auction by Tehsildar , Gautam Budh Nagar .

448 Noida 32 FAFO No. 1797/05

Vinod Trivedi VS PICUP ( M/S Agrichem Plastic Pvt. Ltd.)

- filed Ateeq Ahmad Khan This writ petition was filed to stay the recovery proceedings in pursuance of R.C.

449 Noida 33 29411/08 Vikas Gupta VS State of U.P. ( M/S Bharat Lubricant Pv. Ltd.)

68.64 filed Gautam Baghel This WP was filed by the petitioner against recovery action to be initiated by Corporation against the unit.

450 Noida 34 6013/04 Yusaf Ali VS State of U.P. ( M/S Sonil Brake Lining Pvt. Ltd.

- filed Gautam Baghel This WP was filed against recovery action ( PRC issued) initiated by the Corporation against the directors of the company.

451 Noida 35 Spl. Appeal no. 195/13

Surinder Mohan Sharma VS UPFC ( M/S Atar Singh & M/S Harish Inds).

1.86 filed Gautam Baghel This special appeal was filed by the third person.

452 Noida 36 FA No. 296/13

Maqbool Khan VS UPFC ( M/S Usha Lamp Pvt. Ltd.)

7.05 filed Gautam Baghel This appeal was filed by the appellant against the order of ADJ, Bulandshahr dt. 23.01.13

453 Noida 37 FAFO NO. 1262/04

Maqbool Khan VS UPFC ( M/S Usha Lamp Pvt. Ltd.)

- filed Gautam Baghel

454 Noida 38 22238/12 M/S Prompt International Pvt. Ltd. VS Regional Rehabilitation Committee & Ors.

46.47 filed Gautam Baghel This WP was filed by the petitioner against Notice U/S-29 issued by Corporation against the unit.

455 Noida 39 28644/08 Two Brothers VSUPFC - filed Gautam Baghel The unit sold. PRC for balance unrecovered amount yet to be issued.

456 Noida 40 67643/06 M/S Two Brothers - filed Gautam Baghel The unit sold. PRC for balance unrecovered amount yet to be issued.

457 Noida 41 Cr. Misc. 34361/09

Manish Jain VS State of U.P. ( M/S Integrated Organics Pvt. Ltd.

4.90 filed Gautam Baghel OTS done . Party has paid entire OTS amount.

458 Noida 42 30175/2007

Rajindra Kumar Aggarwal VS UPFC ( M/S Bhartiy Plastics Udyog

5.18 filed Ateeq Ahmad Khan This writ petition was filed by the petitioner against R.C. issued by the Corporation .

48

459 Noida 43 FA No. 448/13

M/S Widecom Fax & Floaters Ltd. VS UPFC

0.00 filed Gautam Baghel This writ petition was filed by the petitioner against R.C. issued by the Corporation .

460 Noida 44 64713/08 M/S Kaurab Exports Ltd. VS UPSIDC & Ors.

0.00 filed Gautam Baghel This writ petition was filed against demand of transfer levy by UPSIDC .

461 Noida 45 63074/08 M/S Matt Global VS UPSIDC & Ors.

0.00 filed Gautam Baghel This writ petition was filed against demand of transfer levy by UPSIDC .

462 Noida 46 17239/14 Narendra Kumar Bhati VS State of U.P. ( M/S Narendra Agricultural Inds)

3.25 filed Gautam Baghel This writ petition was filed by the petitioner against our action taken U/S-29 of SFC's Act.

463 Varanasi 1 53890/06 Purushottam Jaiswal vs Bpard pf Revemie & other (M/s. Unique Butyle Tube Industries Pvt. Ltd., Jaunpur)

219.11 Filed Maintained status quo Sh. Gautam Baghel9335109266 gbahel@Redif mail.com

Petitioner pleaded before Hon`ble High Court that auction sale has been p/m and were not embedded to the earth hence movable property & no objection was maintainable under section 173 of U.P. Land Revenue Act. Hon`ble High Court on 26.09.06 maintained status quo. Material facts have been that UPPCL is unsecured creditor hence does not entitle to auction hypothecated asset of secured creditor as per law. Further entire action proceeding have been undertaken beyond jurisdiction and power. Office of Board has served charge sheet against erring officer on 04.08.07. Supplementary affidavit filed in July,12 appraising ground reality. Our counsel assured that he is aware about the case as soon as the case is

464 Varanasi 2 45857/10 Laxmi Dyeing House Vs.Collector & others

49.60 Filed R.C.stayed Sh. A.A.Khan 9305370801 [email protected]

Corporation earlier on 06.03.02 extended OTS on Rs. 64.67 lacs but borrower paid only Rs. 1.00 lacs. Borrower has no intention to liquidate outstanding dues. Borrower are litigant & had put legal hurdle on both recovery action i.e. U/s. 29 & R.C. In pursuance of verdict of Hon`ble Supreme Court in case of M/s. Unique Butyle Tube Ind Pvt. Ltd., Vs. UPFC, Hon`ble High Court stayed recovery proceeding. R.A. has returned the R.C. we are referring the matter to Litigation cell, Allahabad for getting the writ infructuous .

465 Varanasi 3 45858/2010

M/s. Payasi Exports,Distt. Mirzapur

13.22 Filed R.C.stayed Sh. A.A.Khan 9305370801 Corporation earlier on 06.03.02 extended OTS on Rs. 18.18 lacs but borrower paid only Rs. 5.00 lacs. Borrower has no intention to liquidate outstanding dues. Borrower are litigant & had put legal hurdle on both recovery action i.e. U/s. 29 & R.C. In pursuance of verdict of Hon`ble Supreme Court in case of M/s. Unique Butyle Tube Ind Pvt. Ltd., Vs. UPFC, Hon`ble High Court stayed recovery proceeding. In the present situation, we have no other option except to withdraw R.C. & get infructuous.

49

466 Varanasi 4 64719 of 2005

Sri Anwar Ahmad Prop. of M/s. Lotus Glass Works Distt. Chandauli Vs. State

2.57 R.C.stayed Sh. A.A.Khan 9305370801 Revenue authority auctioned the assets on Rs. 3.00 lacs on 20.01.89 against which petitioner filed writ ( 2233 of 1989) that huge amount of raw materials lying in factory premises have not been auctioned together with objection for irregularity in auction proceedings. The said objection was dismissed in default on 10.11.97. Despite persuation, borrower did not settle account hence PRC was issued on 16.02.05. Hon`ble High Court stayed recovery

467 Varanasi 5 First appeal 2 of 2000

M/s. Sehmalpur Cold Storage, Varanasi Vs. UPFC

5.02 Stayed Sh. Gautam Baghel OTS facility was extended vide letter dt. 23.03.92 on Rs. 11.47 lacs. Borrower paid only Rs. 7.25 lacs. Lateron, carrying malafide intention, raised accounting disputes & filed suit. Lower Court passed judgment in favour of the corporation. In order to avert from recovery action U/s. 29, petition filed before Hon`ble High Court. Despite persuation, borrower has yet not given any inclination to settle account. Case is listing weekly but due to want of time could not be taken up. Likely to e disposed soon as informed by counsel

468 Varanasi 6 W.P.No. -----/2015

Jai Prakash Singh vs. U.P.State & others (M/s. Chandra jute Bag, Jaunpur

0.00 Stayed One of the partners of the firm filed present writ and got stayed. Actually unit was sold U/s. 29 but purchaser could not clear the sale consideration along with intt. Thereon. After disposal of mortgaged assets, OTS of balance loan liabilities of original borrower approved and OTS amount was also paid by the borrower. Inspite of disclosing the factual position before Court, Hon`ble Court stayed the recovery action against mortgaged assets.

469 Varanasi 7 Company petition470 Varanasi 8 33 of 2006 before Hon`ble High

Court, Allahabad M/s Motiwala Industries Ltd., Varanasi

110.59 Prior to filing company petition, promoter sold off asset of the company in favour of M/s. Prashant Glass Works Pvt. Ltd., for sale consideration of Rs. 420.42 lacs, a sister concern. The matter was taken up with Hon`ble High Court. Highest offer received for Rs. 3.00 core M/s. Prashant Glass Works Pvt. Ltd. have made offer of Rs. 420.00 lacs. Official Liquidator has approved for cancellation of earlier sale of assets ( 45924 of 2007). Hon`ble High Court vide order dt. 28.03.2012 ordered for firm cancellation of sale thereafter request of M/s. Prashant Glass Works shall be considered. It is anticipated that charged assets shall be sold off during C.F.Y. We have contacted O.L. on 12.12.12 and discussed the case. The required information /papers will be furnished to them within a week,

50

471 Varanasi 9 10 of 1991 before Hon`ble High Court, Allahabad M/s Prasad Bakers Pvt. Ltd. Varanasi

11.89 Filed Hon`ble High Court has sold off p/m for Rs. 2.45 lacs. Land, building yet to be sold off in absence of buyer at reasonable value. There are dispute among directors. The land is on lease for 30+ 10 years commencing from 01.02.82 & is in the name of one of the director, As per sale policy, the land shall be as free hold One of the director on discussion offered for OTS on OSP., which is not as per OTS policy as value of remaining asset shall not be less than Rs. 50.00 lacs. We have contacted O.L. on 12.12.12 and discussed the case. The required information /papers will be furnished to them within a week,

472 Varanasi 10 M/s. Anson Engg. Company Pvt. Ltd., Distt. Chandauli

4.38 Filed O.L. did not take any action for sale of assets, later on, Smt. Urmila Ray on behalf of the company approached corporation for OTS, which was consented for Rs. 9.50 lacs on 18.07.05. Entire OTS amount has been paid but intt. DADP of Rs. 4.50 lacs (tentative) has yet not been paid. Smt. Urmila Ray opted for out of court settlement with secured creditors so as to have order from Hon`ble High Court, Kokatta for UPFC to give possession to company. After lot of efforts, she would search out another secured creditors i.e. Allahabad Bank. The OTS cancelled. Unit advertised for sale.

473 Varanasi 11 48664/03 Gopi Kumar Singhania (Unique Butyle Tubes Inds. Vs. State of U.P. & Others

219.11 Sh. A.A.Khan Corporation issued PRC against directors against which company took the matter till Hon`ble Supreme Court, who quashed the PRC. Lateron company filed writ before Hon`ble High Court to seek directives for D.M., Varanasi to return personal property, which were auctioned by them. Hon`ble High Court vide order dt,. 28.07.2010 directed D.M.,Varanasi to return auctioned property thereafter order UPFC to refund auctioned amount together with interest @ 7.96%. Auction purchaser moved application for recall of said order. Hon`ble High Court recalled the order & maintained status quo vide order dt. 28.07.2010. The

474 Varanasi 12 Cr. Misc. R-4366/02

Smt. Madhuri Tripathi Vs. State (Bajrang PVC Pipes)

36.05 Filed Sh. A.A.Khan EOW investigated the matter in regard to alleged defective suuply of p/m and lateron filed charge sheet & case diary before district court. Distt. Court issued non baiiable warrant against which petitioner has filed writ for quashing of charge sheet. The matter is being contested by Govt. counsel

51

475 Varanasi 13 Cr. Misc. R-4542/02

Smt. Nirmala Tripathi Vs. State & Others (Bajrang PVC Pipes)

0.00 Filed Sh. A.A.Khan EOW investigated the matter in regard to alleged defective supply of p/m and lateron filed charge sheet & case diary before district court. Distt. Court issued non bailable warrant against which petitioner has filed writ for quashing of charge sheet. The matter is being contested by Govt. counsel.

476 Varanasi 14 FAFO 892/03

Kesharwani Plast Pvt.Ltd., & Others

0.00 Filed Sh. A.A.Khan Petitioner filed appeal against order of lower court for recovery against personal assets. Assets of unit sold U/s. 29 of SFC s Act. We are persuing directors of the company to settle balance liability through OTS. . Relevant details again being sent to Litigation Cell, Allahabad for getting the writ infructuous.

477 Varanasi 15 FAFO No. 11816/04

Ganesh Inds., Vs. UPFC & others

12.09 Filed Sh. A.A.Khan Petitioner filed appeal against order of lower court for recovery against personal assets.

478 Varanasi 16 6360/06 M/s. Ashok Kumar Devendra Kumar Vs. UPFC

26.40 Filed Sh. A.A.Khan Corporation has already sold off p/m. Petitioner recalled writ on 19.07.2011.

479 Varanasi 17 FA No. 656/05

UPFC Vs. Shashidhar Narain Mishra & others ( Shree Ice Factory)

4.58 Filed Sh. A.A.Khan Purchaser after depositing part amount, lateron denied to hay any sale consideration. Against the order of lower court corporation filed appeal in the Hon`ble High Court. Matter is yet not been decided. Efforts for sale of assets is being taken.

480 Varanasi 18 FA55/92 UPFC V/s M/s Love Affection

0.00 Filed Sh. A.A.Khan Pending for decision. Assets sold. Borrower is absconding.

481 Varanasi 19 67199/2009

Smt. Rajni Gupta Vs. UPFC(M/s. Motiwala Industries)

110.59 Filed Sh. A.A.Khan One of the guarantor mortgager filed this writ asking direction from the Hon`ble court for considering for OTS as individual.

482 Varanasi 20 29382/01 Arun Kumar V/s ADJ +UPFC M/s Arun Treads Works

2.61 Filed Sh. A.A.Khan Pending for decision. Title challenged. OTS not honored. Latest status is being asked from Litigation Cell, Allahabad

483 Varanasi 21 399/03 UPFC Vs. Shanker Oil Factory (M/s. Shanker Iron Foundry)

2.15 Filed Sh. A.A.Khan Stay in favour of UPFC order dt. 08.04.03. Title challenged on the basis of fake entry in wrong name in Revenue records. Latest status is being asked from Litigation Cell, Allahabad

52

484 Varanasi 22 13260/07 Kala Nath Mishra Vs. Commissioner, Varanasi ( M/s. Shivam fuels, Varanasi)

9.51 Filed Sh. A.A.Khan W.P. has been filed against order dated `12.01.2007 passed by commissioner, Varanasi. Case was taken up on 21.03.07 and four weeks time has been granted by Hon`ble High Court to file counter affidavit. filed. Auction set aside. Same order has been challenged by auction purchaser. The orders of Commissioner, Varanasi has been sent to revenue authority but has not been executed so far. Matter has been taken up with the office of Commissioner for the execution of orders being no stay. Case is likely to be listed on 15.02.13. .We have also requested our counsel at Commissioner Court to get executed the orders of Hon`ble Commissioner.

485 Varanasi 23 5374/ 09 P.S.Inds. Vs UPFC & others( M/s Keoref Creations)

0.00 Sh. A.A.Khan Sale letter could not be issued as first purchaser obtained stay. Due to delay, corporation decided to initiate sale process afresh offer to petitioner to participate but they did not agree & filed writ to seek directives for UPFC to consider sale as per their proposal. Case is fixed for 22.02.13.

486 Varanasi 24 42653/10 Jag Mohan Singh Vs.UPFC &Others(Golden Rice Mill)

0.00 Filed Sh. A.A.Khan As per direction of Hon`ble High Court, representation of the petitioner was disposed off through speaking order. Petitioner again filed writ to seek relief. Assets have already been sold off & sale deed has also been executed in favour of purchaser. We are persuing petitioner for settlement of balance liabilities through OTS.

487 Varanasi 25 3801/06 H.P.Gupta Vs. UPFC(Hotel Ashadeep,Vns.)

0.00 Filed Sh. A.A.Khan A/c. settled under OTS. Petitioner has been advised to withdraw the writ.. Writ disposed off on 11.04.2013

488 Varanasi 26 986/83 UPFC Vs. Board of Revenue (M/s. Chaurasia Ind.,Mirzapur)

0.00 Filed Sh. A.A.Khan Assets sold U/s. 29. Remaining liabilities is to be settled.

489 Varanasi 27 41152/12 Anil Engg.Works Vs.State Govt. & others

0.00 Filed Sh. A.A.Khan Assets sold U/s. 29. Remaining liabilities is to be settled.

490 Varanasi 28 M/s. Mercury Enterprises Vs. State of UP & others

4.00 Filed Sh. A.A.Khan Brief of the case provided to our counsel. Case is yet to be argued. PRC was issued against the borrower.

6824.90

u.p. financial corporation statement of cases...

Documents