update on the proposed urban agriculture regulations planning commission august 20, 2014

16
Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014

Upload: denis-tyler

Post on 24-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014

Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations

Planning Commission August 20, 2014

Page 2: Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014

August 20, 2014

Urban Agriculture Overview

• 2011 - Sustainable Code Project

• 2012- 2014 - Public Involvement Committees

• 2013 - Plan Tucson’s Urban Agriculture Policy

• 2014 - Public Meetings (4)

• 2014 - Expected Planning Commission Review

• 2015 - Expected Mayor and Council Review

Page 3: Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014

August 20, 2014

Draft Proposal

• Implements Plan Tucson’s urban agriculture policy by promoting the safe, equitable growth and distribution of locally produced food.

• Attempts to adjust the scale and intensity to accommodate as is practical current practices.

• Attempts to remain compatible with surrounding land uses.

• The amendments will be optional to property owners and not a compulsory part of a development.

Page 4: Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014

Process

Clarion Consultants diagnostic & draft recommendations

Staff review & revisions

Sustainable Code Committee

Urban Agriculture Task Force

Public meetings

Planning Commission Mayor & Council for approval

Staff review & revisions

Page 5: Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014

August 20, 2014

Public Meeting Feedback

• Three Public Meetings – May, June and July

• Attendance respectively 150, 130 , and 30 for Spanish-only

• 4th Meeting tentatively planned for September

• General Response

• Draft proposal is too restrictive

• Does not facilitate urban agriculture as practiced in Tucson.

• Feedback being evaluated to address issues raised

• Return to September public meeting with revised recommendations

Page 6: Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014

August 20, 2014

Issues

• Gardening – Principal and Accessory Uses• On-site Gardening

• Community Gardening

• Urban Farms

• On-site Sales

• Small Animals• Chickens and Fowl

• Miniature Goats

• Rabbits etc.

• Farmers’ Markets• Principal

• Accessory

• Associated Issues• Composting

• Greenhouses

• Larger Animals

• General Farming

Page 7: Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014

August 20, 2014

Gardening Re-evaluation• General Farming on large lots confusion with urban agriculture

being evaluated along with clarifications on large animals

• Urban Farms

• Definition vs. the existing crop production, use class

• Difference between large garden and crop production

• Community Gardens

• On-site sales

• Practicality of animal raising

• Accessory use at multi-family housing

• State Statute affecting on-site sales being evaluated with City Attorney

• May affect urban farms and sales at family dwellings

Page 8: Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014

August 20, 2014

Gardening - Potential Solution• General Farming

• Keep General Farming in large lot zones as is

• Urban Farms

• Consider merging with crop production

• Create clearer definition based on commercial aspect and lot size

• Coordinate with State Statute for on-site sales

• Community Gardens

• Clarify as accessory use in multi-family housing.

• Clarify limitations for on-site sales

• Consider Special Exception for supplemental animal raising

• Clarify statutory rights of citizens on on-site sales

Page 9: Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014

August 20, 2014

Small Animal Re-evaluation

• Number restriction on chickens and other animals is too restrictive.

• Current setbacks are unreasonable.

• Relying on a fixed-number approach does not accommodate different lot sizes and the type of animal being kept.

Page 10: Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014

August 20, 2014

Small Animal Potential Solutions

• Use the Animal Unit approach based on lot size• Allows flexibility on choosing the number of

animals

• Have an overall cap on small animals for urban residential zones

• Clarify differences with large animals• Clarify miniature goats and regular goats

• Develop a setback for pens based on experience and code enforcement

Page 11: Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014

August 20, 2014

PROPOSAL - The Urban Animal Unit (UAU)In urban areas, the number of animals permitted is based on property size and type of animal:

UAUs consider the relative impact of different types of animals on the land and on the neighbors.

2 UAUs are permitted for every 1000 sq ft of property.

Chickens, rabbits and guinea pigs = 1 UAUDucks = 2 UAUsTurkeys and geese = 4 UAUsMiniature goats = 5 UAUs

Page 12: Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014

August 20, 2014

Rules for BACKYARD CHICKENS

Topic Current Rules Proposed Rules

Number permitted24

No roosters

Depends on lot size: 2 per 1000 sq ft. Typical 7000 sq ft. lot = 14 chickens

No roosters

Where permitted Any zone Any zone

Coop sizeNot more than 12’

high

Small: not more than 6’ high

Large: not more than 12’ high

Coop setbacks50’ from all

property lines

Small: up to 2 on the property lineLarge: 10/20 ft from property lines abutting residential properties; 0’ from property lines abutting alleys or right of ways

Page 13: Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014

August 20, 2014

Farmers’ Markets – Re-evaluation

• Currently an industrial permanent use

• Not recognized as a temporary, intermittent use

• Draft still does not allow in less restrictive zones

• Draft’s hours of operation are not convenient

• As a temporary use should be allowed in residential and office zones

Page 14: Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014

August 20, 2014

Farmers’ Markets – Potential Solutions

• Allow as an accessory use in certain residential and office zones where parking is available

• Consider if it is already an accessory use by interpretation for certain civic uses in residential zones

• Consider more flexible hours of operation

• Allow in commercial zones as a principal or accessory use.

Page 15: Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014

August 20, 2014

Other Urban Agriculture Reviews

IssuesNon-profit agricultural programs - 4-H and the FFA, will not be able to operate under the proposed regulations.

Clarify composting and greenhouse standards.

Potential Solutions

•Give exemption to non-profit programs like 4-H.

•Allow composting and greenhouses as accessory uses with clear mitigation standards.

Page 16: Update on the Proposed Urban Agriculture Regulations Planning Commission August 20, 2014

August 20, 2014

Next Steps

August – September: Revise the draft

Keep it simple

Use tested local precedents when practical

Use current standards when practical.

Late September: Present the revised proposal at a public meeting

November – January: Study session(s) and public hearing with the Planning Commission

March: Public hearing by Mayor and Council