updating the fresh-saline water interface map in eastern ...€¦ · observed freshwater and top of...
TRANSCRIPT
Updating the Fresh-Saline Water Interface Map in Eastern Kentucky
Jerrad Grider, Ethan Davis, and Marty Parris with contributions from Bart Davidson,
Junfeng Zhu, and Charles Taylor
Kentucky Geological SurveyAnnual Meeting
Lexington, KYMay 15, 2015
• Active oil play in Devonian Berea Sandstone in eastern Kentucky (Elliott, Carter, Greenup, Lawrence, and Boyd Counties)
• Play developed using horizontal drilling (approximately 50 wells completed so far) and hydraulic fracturing at relatively shallow depth (most less than 2,000 ft)
• Though volume of fluid used in hydraulic fracturing Berea reservoir is small compared to other unconventional plays, shallow depth necessitates prudence in development of resource
Motivation
• Surface casing intended to protect groundwater during oil and gas drilling
• Depth of surface casing often based on map from Hopkins (1966) of the fresh-saline water interface
Surface Casing
http://www.rigzone.com/training/insight.asp?insight_id=333&c_id=24
• Interface defined using TDS values less and greater than 1,000 ppm to define fresh and saline water, respectively
• Used data from domestic water wells
Hopkins Fresh-Saline Water Interface Map
StudyArea
Parameters Documented by Hopkins
•Total dissolved solids (ppm)
•Chloride concentration (ppm)
•Well depth below land surface (ft)
•Well depth reference to sea level (ft)
•Assumed altitude bottom of well (feet reference to sea level) equals base of fresh water
Hopkins Map in Study Area
• Based on data from 28 wells
• Significant amount of interpolation
• Considered influence of topography on base of freshwater
• Elevation ranges from 820 to 433 ft
Hopkins’ Interface Defined
• Fresh-saline water interface (red) equals:Surface elevation (black) – well depth from surface (yellow)
• Observed > True fresh saline water interface (reference to sea level)• Hopkins’ map likely underestimates depth to true fresh-saline water interface in
many, if not most, areas• Financial and technical reasons not to drill to deeper aquifer• Aquifers discontinuous especially for Pennsylvanian sandstone
Aquifer 2
Aquifer 1
Ground surface
Aquifer 3
Sea Level
Well #1
Well #2
Saline water
True fresh-saline water
Observed fresh-saline water
Reanalysis and DeepestObserved Freshwater
• Additional data including post-1966 domestic wells (dark blue) could potentially deepen “fresh-saline water interface”
• Even w/ new data, interface will likely be underestimated—hence the term “Deepest Observed Freshwater”
Ground surface
Sea LevelSaline water
True fresh-saline water
Observed fresh-saline water
Methods
• Query Kentucky Groundwater Data Repository to extract data for wells with total depth 1,000 ft or less below ground surface
• Selected wells reporting chloride values at or below 500 mg/l AND wells completed as domestic water wells
28 Hopkins Wells120 New Wells
Deepest Observed
Freshwater
550650
750850
850
950
1050
850
950
750 650
650 650 550
550 450
550
650
75
0
55
0
65
0Little Sandy River
Drainage
Confining Interval
Thickness
550650
750850
850
950
1050
850
950
750 650
650 650 550
550 450
550
650
75
0
55
0
65
0
450350
400
1050
550
1150
8501650
650
650 750
Thickness of Mississippian-Pennsylvanian strata from deepest observed freshwaterto top of Berea Sandstone
Oil and Gas Observations—A Path to Less Wrongness?
• Oil and gas wells (green) routinely penetrate depths over which fresh and salt water are found
• From about mid-1970s observations on depth of fresh and salt water recorded in oil wells (green)
• But how good are the observations?
Sea LevelSaline water
True fresh-saline water
Observed fresh-saline water
Aquifer
Aquifer
Oil and Gas Observations—Varied Quality
Salinity determination during drilling
Conductivity meter (few measurements?, quantitative)
Salinity strips
Taste test (many measurements, qualitative)
Example—Lawrence Co.
• In each 5’ carter cell, compiled freshwater depths/elevations recorded in oil and gas wells in odd-numbered 1’ carter cells
• Summarized data from each north-south row of 5’ grids; i.e., 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, and 84
Map courtesy of Tom Sparks.
O&G Deepest Freshwater (edited)—Does It Pass the Taste Test?
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
800
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
DO
F (f
t, s
ea
leve
l)
Elevation (ft, sea level)
Carter_78
Carter_79
Carter_80
Carter_81
Carter_82
Carter_83
Carter_84
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85
DO
F (F
T, S
EA L
EVEL
)
5 MIN. CARTER COLUMN
StdDev Avg Median Max Min
West East
1515 12
39
21
13
5
O&G Deepest Observed Freshwater
Hopkins
GWDB
O&G
Summary• “New” data from KGS groundwater database improved
robustness of “fresh-saline water interface” (deepest observed freshwater) map by ~4X in study area
• “New” data and derivative maps likely still underestimate true fresh-saline water interface depth
• Corollary is confining interval thickness between deepest observed freshwater and top of Berea Ss. is overestimated
• Oil and gas records might provide opportunity to significantly increase accuracy of fresh-saline water interface
• Though not shown, work with B. Davidson and J. Zhu will extend revision of fresh-saline interface statewide
• Challenge merging depths in areas based on oil and gas observations versus groundwater database
Acknowledgements and References
• John Hickman, Kentucky Geological Survey
• Fresh-Saline Water Interface Map of Kentucky (1966) by H.T. Hopkins:
http://kgs.uky.edu/kgsweb/olops/pub/usgs/saline.pdf
• Kentucky Geologic Survey Groundwater Database
http://kgs.uky.edu/kgsweb/DataSearching/watersearch.asp