urban regeneration: stakeholders and network. ase study of

4
Irene Litardi, Lavinia Pastore University of Roma Tor Vergata (Italy) Michele Trimarchi University of “Magna Grecia” of Catanzaro (Italy) Urban regeneration: stakeholders and network. Case study of the “Ad Duas Lauros” eco-museum in Rome DOI: 10.30819/cmse.2-1.05 A B S T R A C T This article aims to analyse the role of urban stakeholders in promoting and developing regeneration through cultural projects in urban areas. This paper is part of a broader research started in 2015 concerning urban change processes (UCP) in big cities. The analysis presented here is the result of an in- depth case study based on the neighbourhood of Tor Pignattara in the city of Rome: the experience of the urban eco-museum Ad Duas Lauros. The authors focus on its urban stakeholders and their role in the creation of a network. K E Y W O R D S Urban change, network, social engagement, cultural common goods, Rome Paper received: 14 December 2017 Paper revised: 12 April 2018 Paper accepted: 18 April 2018 Michele Trimarchi (PhD) is full Professor of Public Economics, University of Magna Grecia of Catanzaro, and also teaches Cultural Economics at the University of Bologna. He lectures in the most important postgraduate courses in Cultural Economics and Management. Professor Trimarchi has extensively published on issues related to economics and policy of arts and culture, fiscal federalism, and economic analysis of the electoral market. He is a member of the Scientific Committee of the Master Arts and Culture Skills for Management (LUISS Business School, Rome). Email: [email protected] Lavinia Pastore, PhD Candidate in Public Management and Governance, Department of Management and Law, University of Tor Vergata, Rome. Research interests: public management; cultural management; cultural heritage and museum management; social innovation; urban development; commons goods management; new cultural production models of the cinema industry; public policy and EU funding. Email: [email protected] Irene Litardi, PhD Candidate in Public Management and Governance, Department of Management and Law, University of Tor Vergata, Rome. Research interests: public management; CSR; urban sustainability; cultural

Upload: others

Post on 02-Nov-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Urban regeneration: stakeholders and network. ase study of

Irene Litardi, Lavinia Pastore University of Roma Tor Vergata (Italy)

Michele Trimarchi University of “Magna Grecia” of Catanzaro (Italy)

Urban regeneration: stakeholders and network.

Case study of the “Ad Duas Lauros” eco-museum in Rome

DOI: 10.30819/cmse.2-1.05

A B S T R A C T This article aims to analyse the role of urban stakeholders in promoting and developing regeneration

through cultural projects in urban areas. This paper is part of a broader research started in 2015

concerning urban change processes (UCP) in big cities. The analysis presented here is the result of an in-

depth case study based on the neighbourhood of Tor Pignattara in the city of Rome: the experience of

the urban eco-museum Ad Duas Lauros. The authors focus on its urban stakeholders and their role in

the creation of a network.

K E Y W O R D S Urban change, network, social engagement, cultural common goods, Rome

Paper received: 14 December 2017 • Paper revised: 12 April 2018 • Paper accepted: 18 April 2018

Michele Trimarchi (PhD) is full Professor of Public Economics, University of Magna Grecia of Catanzaro, and also teaches Cultural Economics at the University of Bologna. He lectures in the most important postgraduate courses in Cultural Economics and Management. Professor Trimarchi has extensively published on issues related to economics and policy of arts and culture, fiscal federalism, and economic analysis of the electoral market. He is a member of the Scientific Committee of the Master Arts and Culture Skills for Management (LUISS Business School, Rome). Email: [email protected] Lavinia Pastore, PhD Candidate in Public Management and Governance, Department of Management and Law, University of Tor Vergata, Rome. Research interests: public management; cultural management; cultural heritage and museum management; social innovation; urban development; commons goods management; new cultural production models of the cinema industry; public policy and EU funding. Email: [email protected]

Irene Litardi, PhD Candidate in Public Management and Governance, Department of Management and Law, University of Tor Vergata, Rome. Research interests: public management; CSR; urban sustainability; cultural

Page 2: Urban regeneration: stakeholders and network. ase study of

management; social innovation; commons goods management; stakeholder engagement; public policy analysis; sustainable and green public procurement. Email: [email protected]

References Albareda, L., Lozano, J.M. Ysa, T. (2007), Public

Policies on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Governments in Europe, Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4): 391-407.

Alkhafaji, A.F. (1989), A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Governance: Managing in a Dynamic Environment, New York: Quorum Books.

Atkinson, R. (2004), The evidence on the impact of gentrification: new lessons for the urban renaissance?, European Journal of Housing Policy, 4(1): 107-131.

Atkinson, R., Bridge, G. (2005), Gentrification in a global context, the new urban colonialism, Londra, New York: Routledge.

Becker, J. (2014), Nella Periferia Centrale, in Cellamare, C., S.M.U.R., Roma città autoprodotta, ricerca urbana e linguaggi artistici, Manifestolibri, Castel San Petro Romano (RM).

Belligni, S., Ravazzi, S. (2013), La politica e la città. Regime urbano e classe dirigente a Torino, Il Mulino.

Bianchini, F., Parkinson, M. (1993), Cultural policy and Urban Regeneration: the West European Experience, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Bishop, P., Davis, G. (2002), Mapping public participation in policy choices, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(1): 14-29.

Boniburini, I. (2009), Le parole della città, In: Boniburini, I. (Ed.) Alla ricerca della città vivibile, Firenze: Alinea.

Borri, D. (1985), Lessico urbanistico, Bari: Dedalo.

Cameron, S., Doling, J. (1993), Housing Neighbourhoods and Urban Regeneration, Urban Studies.

Cellamare, C. (1999), Culture e progetto del territorio, Milano: Franco Angeli.

Cellamare, C. (2012), Progettualità dell’agire urbano. Processi e pratiche urbane, Roma: Carocci.

De Toni, A.F., Nonino, F. (2009), La misura del capitale sociale organizzativo attraverso le reti informali, Sviluppo&organizzazione.

Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000), The Dynamics of Innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Research Policy, 29: 109-123.

Evans, G. (2004), Cultural Industry Quarters, In: Bell, D., Jayne M. (Eds.), City of quarters: urban villages in the contemporary city, Aldershot, Burlington: Ashgate.

Florida, R. (2002), The rise of the creative class: and how it is transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life, New York: Basic Books.

Freeman, R.E. (1984), Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach, Boston: Pitman.

Freeman, R.E. et al (2010), Stakeholder Theory. The State of the Art, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Glass, R. (1964), Introduction: aspects of change, In: Centre for Urban Studies, MacGibbon and Kee, London: aspects of chance, London.

Hugues, V. (2005), Le radici del futuro. Il patrimonio culturale al servizio dello sviluppo locale, a cura di Daniele Jalla, Bologna: Clueb.

Jeffrey, N. (2009), Stakeholder Engagement: A Road Map to Meaningful Engagement, Doughty Centre, Cranfield: Cranfield School of Management.

Khazaei, A., Elliot, S., Joppe, M. (2015), An application of stakeholder theory to advance community participation in tourism planning: the case for engaging immigrants

Page 3: Urban regeneration: stakeholders and network. ase study of

as fringe stakeholders, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(7): 1049-1062.

Koch, A., Stahlecker, T. (2006), Regional innovation systems and the foundation of knowledge intensive business services. A comparative study in Bremen, Munich, and Stuttgart, Germany, European Planning Studies, 14(2): 123-146.

Lee, R.L.M. (2005), Bauman, liquid modernity and dilemmas of development, Thesis Eleven, 83: 61–77.

Lees, L. (2008), Gentrification and Social Mixing: toward an inclusive urban renaissance?, Urban Studies, 45(12): 2449-2470.

Litardi, I., Pastore, L., Trimarchi, M. (2016), Culture and the city. Public action and social participation in Rome’s experience, Publication in progress in issue 7, Journal of Business and Economics.

Logan, J.R., Molotch, H.L. (1987), Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place, Barkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

Maggi, M. (2002), Ecomusei. Guida europea, Torino: Umberto Allemandi & C.

Mitchel, R. et al (1997), Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts, Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853-886.

Morad, M. (2008), Sustainable Communities: a Conceited Metaphor or an Achievable Aim?, Local Economy (Routledge), 23(3): 111-112.

Ostrom, E., Hess, C. (2006), Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice, Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Peck, P. (2005), Struggling with the Creative Class, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, 29(4): 740-770.

Pogrebin, R. (2009), Philanthropist With a Sense of Timing Raises Her Profile, The New York Times.

Radywyl, N., Biggs, C. (2013), Reclaming the commons for urban transformation, Journal of Cleaner Production, 50: 159-170.

Ranga, M., Etzkowitz, H. (2013), Triple Helix Systems: an Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society, Industry and Higher Education, 27(4): 237-262.

Sassen, S. (1997), La città nell’economia globale, Bologna: Il Mulino.

Semenza, J., March, T. (2009), An Urban Community-Based Intervention to Advance Social Interactions, Environment & Behavior, 41(1): 22-42.

Smith, N. (1997), The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City, London: Routledge.

Smith, N. (2002), New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy, Antipode, 34(3): 434-457.

Svara, J.H., Denhardt, J. (2010), The Connected Community: Local Governments as Partners in Citizen Engagement and Community Building, Arizona State University.

Toomey, B. (2008), Can the Use of Technology Encourage Young People to Take an Active Part in Urban Regeneration Consultations? A Case Study from East London, Local Economy (Routledge), 23(3): 247-251.

Visconti, L.M., Sherry, J.F., Borghini, S., Anderson, L. (2010), Street Art, Sweet Art? Reclaiming the “Public” in Public Place, Journal of Consumer Research.

Vivek, N.M. et al (2007), Defining, identifying and mapping stakeholders in the assessment of urban sustainability, In: Horner, M., Hardcastle, C., Price, A., Bebbington, J. (Eds), International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment, Glasgow.

Warner, M. (2002), Publics and Counterpublics, Public Culture, 14(1): 49–90.

Williams, P., Smith, N. (1986), From renaissance to restructuring: the dynamics of contemporary urban development, In: Smith, N., Williams, P. (Eds.), Gentrification of the city, Boston.

Wróblewski, Ł. (2014), The influence of creative industries on the socio-economic

Page 4: Urban regeneration: stakeholders and network. ase study of

development of regions in Poland, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 2(1): 45-57.

Wróblewski, Ł. (2016), Creating an image of a region – Euroregion Beskydy and Euroregion Cieszyn Silesia examples, Economics and Management, 8(1): 91-100.

Wróblewski, Ł. (2017), Culture Management. Strategy and Marketing Aspects, Berlin: Logos Verlag Berlin.

Zukin, S. (2010), Naked city. The death and life of authentic urban places, New York: Oxford Press.

Useful websites Eco-Museum “Ad Duas Lauros”: http://www.ecomuseocasilino.it/

The project is financed under the agreement 892_/P-DUN/2018 by the funds of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education allocated to the activities disseminating science.