u.s. election model update · 2020. 10. 27. · u.s. election model update mark zandi, chief...

40
U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist October 2020 XXXXX, Title Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

Upload: others

Post on 21-Feb-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

U.S. Election Model Update

Mark Zandi, Chief Economist

October 2020XXXXX, TitleBernard Yaros, Assistant Director

Page 2: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 2

1. Who Will Be the Next President?

2. Which State Will Determine the Presidency?

3. U.S. Congressional Races

4. Wildcards

Agenda

Page 3: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

1 Who Will Be the Next

President?

Page 4: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 4

Biden Will Win a Nailbiter How states will vote if nonincumbent turnout is typical

Source: Moody’s Analytics

Democrat

Republican

Electoral count:

Democrats: 279

Republicans: 259

Note: Results reflect Oct 2020 forecast

Page 5: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 5

How a Biden Blowout Would Look LikeHow states will vote if nonincumbent turnout is high

Source: Moody’s Analytics

Democrat

Republican

Electoral count:

Democrats: 352

Republicans: 186

Turns Democrat

Note: Results reflect Oct 2020 forecast

Page 6: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 6

Trump Can Still Win if Nonincumbent Turnout Is LowHow states will vote if nonincumbent turnout is low

Source: Moody’s Analytics

Democrat

Turns Republican

Electoral count:

Democrats: 209

Republicans: 329

Republican

Note: Results reflect Oct 2020 forecast

Page 7: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 7

President Trump’s Approval Is Low but Stable

Sources: Gallup, Moody’s Analytics

Historical range of approval ratings for U.S. presidents, %

20 40 60 80 100

TrumpObama

W. BushClinton

H.W. BushReagan

CarterFord

NixonJohnsonKennedy

EisenhowerTruman

Roosevelt

Avg during

presidency

Page 8: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 8

-1

0

1

2

3

4

20Q1 20Q2 20Q3 20Q4 21Q1 21Q2 21Q3 21Q4

Rental and interest income Dividend IncomeProprietors' income Labor incomeEased pass-through limits Expanded UI benefitsRecovery rebates Automatic stabilizers

Voters Head to Polls With Aggregate Incomes Mostly IntactDisposable personal income, $ tril, SAAR, change from 2019Q4

Sources: BEA, CBO, JCT, Moody’s Analytics

Disposable personal income

Page 9: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 9

Older Voters Are Paying Close Attention to Stock Prices

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

20,000

22,000

24,000

26,000

28,000

30,000

32,000

34,000

36,000

38,000

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

Wilshire 5000 (L)

Federal Fund Rate (R)

Sources: Federal Reserve, SIX Financial, Moody’s Analytics

Page 10: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 10

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

20Q1 20Q2 20Q3 20Q4

Red statesTrump-won swing statesClinton-won swing statesBlue states

Unemployment Crisis Is Still Severe…

Sources: BLS, Moody’s Analytics

Unemployment rate, %, SA

Note: 20Q3 and 20Q4 values reflect Oct 2020 forecast

Page 11: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 11

Election Yr Incumbent Recession Unemployment Rate, % Outcome

1912 William Taft January 1910 to January 1912 5.2 Loss

1924 Calvin Coolidge May 1923 to July 1924 5.5 Win

1932 Herbert Hoover August 1929 to March 1933 23.6 Loss

1976 Gerald Ford November 1973 to March 1975 7.7 Loss

1980 Jimmy Carter January 1980 to July 1980 7.2 Loss

1992 George H.W. Bush July 1990 to March 1991 7.5 Loss

2020 Donald Trump March to April 2020 8.5 ?

…And Will Cast a Long Shadow on the 2020 ElectionPresidential elections in which incumbent ran for re-election within two yrs of a recession

Sources: BLS, Census Bureau, NBER, Moody’s Analytics Note: Unemployment rate is annual avg

Page 12: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

2 Which State Will Determine

the Presidency?

Page 13: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 13

Major Shifts in Pennsylvania’s Political Geography # of votes Trump received more/less (+/-) than avg Republican from 1988 to 2012

Sources: Pennsylvania Department of State, Moody’s Analytics

<-10,000

-10,000 to <0

0 to <10,000

≥10,000

Philadelphia

Scranton

Northampton County

Montgomery County

Delaware County

Pittsburgh

Erie Luzerne CountyCentre County

Westmoreland County Chester CountyLancaster

Page 14: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 14

Biden Is Favored to Win Back the Keystone StateHow counties will vote during pandemic if nonincumbent turnout is avg

Source: Moody’s Analytics

Trump’s projected margin

of defeat, # of votes:

111,798

<48%

48% to <50%

50% to <52%

≥52%

Trump’s projected share

of two-party vote in 2020:

Note: Results reflect Sep 2020 forecast

Page 15: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 15

How a Biden Blowout Would Look Like in PennsylvaniaHow counties will vote during pandemic if nonincumbent turnout is high

Source: Moody’s Analytics

Trump’s projected margin

of defeat, # of votes:

224,521

<48%

48% to <50%

50% to <52%

≥52%

Trump’s projected share

of two-party vote in 2020:

Note: Results reflect Sep 2020 forecast

Page 16: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 16

Trump Can Still Win If Nonincumbent Turnout Is LowHow counties will vote during pandemic if nonincumbent turnout is low

Source: Moody’s Analytics

Trump’s projected margin

of victory, # of votes:

38,187

<48%

48% to <50%

50% to <52%

≥52%

Trump’s projected share

of two-party vote in 2020:

Note: Results reflect Sep 2020 forecast

Page 17: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 17

3.5

4.5

5.5

6.5

7.5

8.5

9.5

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16

Donald Trump Hillary Clinton

The Economy Still Matters to Pennsylvanian VotersUnemployment rate, %, in Pennsylvania counties won by…

Sources: BLS, Moody’s Analytics Gray bars: presidential election yrs

Page 18: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 18

Democrats Are Vulnerable to ‘Naked’ Ballot RejectionsMail ballots requested, % of registered voters

Sources: U.S. Elections Project, Moody’s Analytics

<20

20 to <30

30 to <40

≥40

Allegheny County Chester County

Montgomery County

Page 19: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

3 U.S. Congressional Races

Page 20: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 20

5 Vacancies

1 Libertarian

Republicans

197 seats

Party Breakdown of 116th U.S. House of Representatives

Sources: Clerk of the House, Moody’s Analytics

Democrats

232 seats

Key Points:

» Every two yrs, all 435 House seats

are up for grabs

» 218 seats required for a majority

» Republicans need a net gain of at

least 17 seats to retake majority

• 4 previously held

by Republicans

• 1 previously held

by Democrats

Page 21: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 21

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

-24 -18 -12 -6 0 6 12 18 24

Republicans

Democrats

Good News #1 for GOP: 30 Democrats in Trump CountryCompetitive House districts held by…

Sources: University of Virginia Center for Politics, Moody’s Analytics

2018 House of Representatives vote (D less R)

20

16

Pre

sid

en

tia

l vo

te (

D le

ss R

)

Voted for Trump in

‘16 and GOP in ‘18

Voted for Trump in ‘16

and Democrat in ‘18

Voted for Clinton in

‘16 and GOP in ‘18

Voted for Clinton in ‘16

and Democrat in ‘18

Page 22: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 22

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

46 54 62 70 78 86 94 02 10 18

House popular vote (L)

House seats won (R)

D

R

Good News #2 for GOP: Geographic Distribution

Sources: Brookings, Clerk of the House, Moody’s Analytics

Democratic share less Republican share, ppt

Page 23: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 23

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1/1/19 4/1/19 6/30/19 9/28/19 12/27/19 3/26/20 6/24/20 9/22/20

Democrats Republicans

Woodall

(GA-7)

Hurd

(TX-23)

Marchant

(TX-24) Holding

(NC-2)

Walker

(NC-6)

Brooks

(IN-5)

King

(NY-2)

Bad News #1 for GOP: Fewer Incumbents on the BallotCumulative # of House representatives announcing they will not seek reelection in 2020

Sources: Ballotpedia, University of Virginia Center for Politics, Moody’s Analytics

Olson

(TX-22)

Gianforte

(MT-AL)

Loebsack

(IA-2)

Page 24: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 24

Net House gain/loss (+/-) for

incumbent president’s party

Did House

Majority Flip?

Incumbent

President’s Party

Net House gain/loss (+/-) for

incumbent president’s party

Did House

Majority Flip?

Incumbent

President’s Party

1948 75 Yes Democrat 1984 14 No Republican

1952 -22 Yes Democrat 1988 -2 No Republican

1956 -2 No Republican 1992 10 No Republican

1960 22 No Republican 1996 3 No Democrat

1964 37 No Democrat 2000 1 No Democrat

1968 -5 No Democrat 2004 3 No Republican

1972 12 No Republican 2008 -21 No Republican

1976 -1 No Republican 2012 8 No Democrat

1980 -34 No Democrat 2016 6 No Democrat

Historical avg 5.8

Bad News #2 for GOP: HistoryAll postwar presidential election years

Sources: U.S. House of Representatives, Moody’s Analytics

Page 25: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 25

38

40

42

44

46

48

50

4/1/19 6/30/19 9/28/19 12/27/19 3/26/20 6/24/20 9/22/20

Democrats Republicans

Bad News #3 for GOP: Congressional Generic Ballot% of voters who will support given party in congressional elections

Sources: FiveThirtyEight, Moody’s Analytics

Page 26: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 26

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

280

300

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25

2004

Final pre-election generic ballot margin for president’s party, ppt

1980

2000

2016

1996

19841992

1976

19561972

2008

1973

1988

Republicans Risk Sinking Further into House MinorityCongressional elections in presidential election years

Sources: Clerk of the House, FiveThirtyEight, Gallup, Moody’s Analytics

Ho

use

se

ats

wo

n, p

resid

en

t’s p

art

y

Current generic ballot, ppt = -7

1964

1968

2012

Page 27: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 27

Senate Majority Hangs in the Balance

Sources: RealClearPolitics, Moody’s Analytics Note: Reflect avg of polls in past 30 days wherever RCP avg N/A

Republican’s support in head-to-head polls less Democrat’s, ppt

-12

-9

-6

-3

0

3

6

46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55

Republican-held

Democrat-held seat

45 solid blue seats or not up

SCMT

IANC

MEMI

GA

KS

AZ

CO

51 seats for Senate majority

45 solid red seats or not up

Page 28: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

4 Wildcards

Page 29: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 29

0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0

PA

NM

U.S.

NV

IA

NC

FL

CO

Democrat

Other

Republican

Wildcard #1: Early Voting

Sources: U.S. Elections Project, Moody’s Analytics

% of mail ballots returned by party Early voting, % of 2016 turnout, as of Oct 26

<20

20 to <40

40 to <60

≥60

Page 30: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 30

If Pennsylvania Is the Decider, Buckle InWhen mail and absentee ballots are pre-processed

Source: New York Times, Moody’s Analytics

Upon receipt

On Election Day

Before Election Day

Page 31: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 31

0

20

40

60

80

100

9/4/20 9/11/20 9/18/20 9/25/20 10/2/20 10/9/20 10/16/20 10/23/20

Not before Inauguration DayBy Inauguration DayBy Thanksgiving DayBy election week

Election Night Could Morph into Election Month

Sources: The Good Judgement Project, Moody’s Analytics

Probability, %, a major party’s presidential campaign concedes defeat in the 2020 election

Page 32: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 32

1,250

1,300

1,350

1,400

1,450

11/1/00 11/15/00 11/29/00 12/13/00 12/27/00

Full machine recount of FL votes

Gore requests manual recount in four FL counties

FL Supreme Court allows manual recounts to continue

Bush petitions SCOTUSSCOTUS overrules FL Supreme Court

Gore concedes

Election Disputes Could Be Messier Than Gore v. BushS&P 500 Index

Sources: S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Moody’s Analytics

Election day SCOTUS hears arguments in Gore v. Bush

Page 33: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 33

Wildcard #2: COVID-19

Sources: CDC, Moody’s Analytics

14-day change in confirmed COVID-19 infections, %

12% to <20%

>33%

7% to 12%

20% to <33%

<7%

Page 34: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 34

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

Democratic Republican Swing

Pandemic Could Hurt GOP Turnout in Must-Win States

Sources: MIT Election Lab, Johns Hopkins University, PredictIt, Moody’s Analytics

New monthly COVID-19 cases per 1,000 residents, thru 23rd of each month

Counties in most likely tipping-point states, according

to betting markets: PA, FL, WI, MI, AZ, and NC.

Page 35: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 35

US

AL

AK AZ

CA

DE

DC

FL

ID

IL

IA

KY

LAMD

MTNE

NV

NH

NJ

NM

NY

OR

PARI

SD

TN

TX

UT

WA

WV

WIWY

y = 0.0002x + 3.3R² = 0.19

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000

Sources: CDC, BLS, Moody’s Analytics

More Infections…Weaker EconomyY-axis: Change in unemployment rate, 3 mo ended Aug 2020 to 2019Q4

X-axis: Infections per mil inhabitants in Jul

Page 36: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 36

30

40

50

60

70

80

1900 1916 1932 1948 1964 1980 1996 2012

Presidential elections Midterm elections

Wildcard #3: Voter TurnoutU.S. voter turnout, % of voting-eligible population

Sources: U.S. Elections Project, Moody’s Analytics

Page 37: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 37

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Trump voters ('20)

Biden voters ('20)

Trump voters ('16)

Clinton voters ('16)

Against Biden

Against Trump

Against Trump

Against Clinton

Enthusiasm for Candidate Versus Negative Partisanship

Sources: Pew Research Center, Moody’s Analytics

% of voters who say their choice is more a vote…

For Trump

For Biden

For Trump

For Clinton

Page 38: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

Q&AEMAIL US

[email protected]

Page 39: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

West Chester, EBA-HQ+1.610.235.5299

121 North Walnut Street, Suite 500

West Chester PA 19380

USA

New York, Corporate-HQ+1.212.553.1653

7 World Trade Center, 14th Floor

250 Greenwich Street

New York, NY 10007

USA

London+44.20.7772.5454

One Canada Square

Canary Wharf

London E14 5FA

United Kingdom

Toronto416.681.2133

200 Wellington Street West, 15th Floor

Toronto ON M5V 3C7

Canada

Prague+420.22.422.2929

Washingtonova 17

110 00 Prague 1

Czech Republic

Sydney+61.2.9270.8111

Level 10

1 O'Connell Street

Sydney, NSW, 2000

Australia

Singapore+65.6511.4400

6 Shenton Way

#14-08 OUE Downtown 2

Singapore 068809

Shanghai+86.21.6101.0172

Unit 2306, Citigroup Tower

33 Huayuanshiqiao Road

Pudong New Area, 200120

China

Contact Us: Economics & Business Analytics Offices

[email protected] economy.com

Page 40: U.S. Election Model Update · 2020. 10. 27. · U.S. Election Model Update Mark Zandi, Chief Economist XXXXX, Title October 2020 Bernard Yaros, Assistant Director

October 2020 40

© 2020 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All

rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND/OR ITS CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY’S CURRENT

OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND

MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE SUCH

CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY’S INVESTORS SERVICE DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS

CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR

IMPAIRMENT. SEE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL

FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S INVESTORS SERVICE CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY

OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-

CREDIT ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF

CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK

AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS,

ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS

TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND

PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS

CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND

UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS

UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS

AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER

OPINIONS OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER

PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH

INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED,

REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR

MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A

BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM

BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or

mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all

necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable

including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or

validate information received in the rating process or in preparing its Publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any

person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information

contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives,

licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective

profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any

direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful

misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the

control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the

information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY

PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY

FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt

securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.

have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees

ranging from $1,000 to approximately $2,700,000. MCO and Moody’s investors Service also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence

of Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings and credit rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO

and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership

interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and

Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S

affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL

383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act

2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a

representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to

“retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt

obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is

wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating

agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ

are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not

qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and

their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and

commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or

MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY250,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.