u.s. ip licensing - bio korea 2016

35
Successful IP Licensing in U.S.

Upload: kisuk-lee

Post on 24-Jan-2018

526 views

Category:

Law


8 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

Successful IP Licensing in U.S. 

Page 2: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

KOREA U.S.

라이센싱 =    Licensing  (?)

Licensing in U.S.

2

1. Language 2. Culture 3. Law

Page 3: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

• Illustration source: BrandMagazine.com

Leading Brands have the Most Valuable IP

3

Page 4: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

4

Value of IP

Page 5: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

5

Success Story – PDL BioPharma

• Source: http://pdl.com

Page 6: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

6

• PDL BioPharma:  Pioneer of humanized monoclonal antibodies

Humanized Antibody

• Source: http://pdl.com

Page 7: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

7

Success Story – PDL BioPharma

• PDL Queen Patent License– Licensees:  Genentech, Roche, Novartis, Biogen, etc.  – Sales of licensed products:  >$20 billions– Paying royalty v. patent invalidation 

• PDL Success Formula – Strong patent portfolio – Successful patent litigation defense

Page 8: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

Enablement

Demonstration

Development

Prob

ability of Success

Effort/Time

Idea Invention Patent License

Invention Disclosure

Commercialization Stage

Commercialization Steps

Source: Michigan Technological University (http://www.mtu.edu/research/references/training/docs-new/Intellectual%20Issues%20in%20Research%20Presentation.ppt.)

Technology Commercialization Process

8

Page 9: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

• Internal review process• Review by in‐house counsels• Making a patent filing decision based on prior art, scientific maturity, commercial value, market conditions, etc.

• Patent v. Trade Secret

Invention Evaluation

9

Page 10: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

Three Stages of Patent Acquisition: A. Invention and Prior Art SearchB. Patent PreparationC. Patent Prosecution

Acquisition of Strong Patent

10

• Two possible approaches: 

vs.

Page 11: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

Source: MIDAS©, 2005–2012, IMS Health Incorporated or its affiliates.

Where to File & License?

11

• Drug Sales 

Page 12: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

12

Licensing Timeline

• Typical licensing procedure

Non‐Confidential Presentation

Confidential Disclosure Agreement 

(CDA)

Due Diligence

Term Sheets

Final Agreement

• Assessment of intellectual property assets owned by (or licensed to) a company

• Critical part of licensing• Complex legal review process

Page 13: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

13

Odds are…?

• Only a few licensing candidates survive at the end

Source: http://www.sharevault.com, Building a better partnering presentation 

Page 14: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

• Due Diligence = checking various (critical) points• No high price for a product having defects 

Licensing = Used Car ?

14

Page 15: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

1. Freedom To Operate (FTO)– Any potential infringement?– Any risks to be sued? 

2. Ownership & Transferability– Owner of your IP? 

3. Validity & Enforceability– Protect target product?– Strong patents? 

IP Due Diligence – Main Points

15

Page 16: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

• Investigation to determine if you infringe patents of others 

• Expensive process but necessary for commercialization 

1. Freedom To Operate (FTO)

16

Page 17: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

• Patent procurement v. Patent infringement 

• Samsung:  Top 2 patent filer in U.S. 

1. Freedom To Operate (FTO)

17

vs. 

Page 18: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

• Source: Lex Machina ‐ Patent Litigation Year in Review (2013).

1. FTO - Patent Damages in U.S.

18

Page 19: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

Source:  http://ptopatenttrials.com/2012/05/20/uspto‐post‐grant‐opposition‐costs‐a‐forum‐conveniens‐for‐invalidity‐disputes/

1. FTO - U.S. Litigation Costs

19

• Assess potential litigation risks in U.S. 

Page 20: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

• Conduct FTO Search  – Conduct patent searches regularly 

– Search competitors’ patents

• Monitor screened patents/applications

• Keep search/review record 

– Patent search/review assessment

• Consult patent counsel 

1. FTO - ID Infringement Risks

20

Page 21: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

• Wrong Inventorship  Unenforceable patent.  See Stark v. Advanced Magnetics, 119 F.3d 1551 (Fed. Cir. 1997) 

• Wrong inventorship 

a) Nonjoinder:  Non‐inclusion of a true inventor

b) Misjoinder:  Inclusion of a non‐inventor 

• Record keeping 

– Invention disclosure 

2. Inventorship

21

Page 22: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

Invention Disclosure • Develop invention disclosure form

• Information to be included:– Title of invention

– Identification of prior art (patents and publications) 

– Detailed description of invention: 

• Differences, improvements, and advantages of the invention

• Specific experimental examples 

– Date of invention, inventor names 

2. Inventorship

22

Source: http://www.uclb.com, Invention Disclosure Form

Page 23: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

• Common Ownership Issues

1. The target does not hold the IP rights

2. Prior agreements limiting the target’s IP rights

3. IP rights encumbered by liens

2. Ownership

23

Page 24: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

• Ownership Transfer ‐ Assignment

– Check chain of title

– Review assignment recordation

– Tip:  Obtain signatures as quickly as possible

• Potential ownership leaks  

– Collaboration, Government support, etc.

• Review agreements with third parties

2. Ownership

24

Page 25: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

1. Patent Exploitation in U.S. 

a) Each joint owner can exploit without permission of others

b) No duty to share royalties

2. Patent Enforcement in U.S.

a) All joint owners must join suit

b) Other owners can grant license (circumvention)

2. Avoid Joint Ownership!

25

Page 26: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

• Anticipation and Obviousness– Collect prior art info– Cross‐check references – Competitor’s patents and publications

• Section 101 Patent Eligibility – Mayo & Myriad cases

• Inequitable Conduct (Duty of Candor)– Cross‐check related applications– Review inventor publication files

• Enablement and Written Description

3. Patent Validity

26

Page 27: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

• Obtain description of target product – Specifications/product literature– Manufacturing documents– Product inserts

• Identify critical terms in claims– Specification, file history, normal usage– Review file histories

• Categorize claims– Covers target product?  How? – Covers competitor’s products?

3. Claim Scope

27

Page 28: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

• Expiration date: Determine the expiration of patents

• Patent Term Adjustment/Extension: PTA v. PTE

4. Other Issues - Patent Term

28

Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) under 35 USC §154

Patent Term Extension (PTE) under 35 USC §156

Eligibility Any Issued Patents  Drug & Device Patents

Delay Patent Office Examination FDA Regulatory Review

Calculation 14 + 4 + 4 + 4 Rule ½ Clinical Trial + FDA Review  Terminal Disclaimer Reduces PTA No Reduction

Maximum Term PTO Delay (A+B+C periods) Five Years

Page 29: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

• Provide NCE/NBE info and related documents• IND and NDA filing dates and estimated NDA approval 

date

4. Other Issues – FDA Exclusivity

29

NBE

Reference Product Approval

Biosimilar Application

Biosimilar Approval

0 12 Years4 Years

NCE Expiration

5 Years

30‐month stay

NCE0

Page 30: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

• Possible Targets:  – New use/indication, new target patient strata, new administration 

route, new formulation

• Adjunct Benefit for Existing Drug:  – Reduced side‐effect, improved therapeutic index, diagnostic 

application

• New “Article‐type” invention:  – Racemate‐to‐chiral switch– New salt, ester, amide, hydrolysate– New crystal form or polymorph, Metabolite or pro‐drug – Combination therapy – Formulation with improved bioavailability

4. Other issues - Life Cycle Management

30

Page 31: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

Prepare IP status reports

Check assignments/invention disclosures 

Perform prior art/patent searching

Review file histories

Prepare strategy for patents having potential issues

Preparation of IP Diligence

31

Page 32: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

IP Diligence Checklist

32

Source: http://media.lockelord.com/files/uploads/Documents/Folios/US‐IP‐DueDiligenceChecklist.pdf

• Due diligence check list

Page 33: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

Virtual Data Room

33

• Virtual data room:  for exchanging secret information• Transparency is the key to success. • Be prepared for data/document disclosure!

Source:  http://www.ethosdata.com/advanced_functionality/

Page 34: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

Set up good IP policy

Build strong IP portfolio

Evaluate IP portfolio regularly 

Look for licensing opportunities

Prepare for due diligence 

Take Home Message

34

Page 35: U.S. IP licensing - Bio Korea 2016

Questions?

Kisuk Lee이기석

Patent Attorney (U.S./KR), PartnerHarness, Dickey & Pierce+1‐314‐446‐7670 – work+1‐324‐775‐8771 – cell

[email protected]/ksluspat – IP blog

35