use of a battery of bioassays to classify hazardous wastes and evaluate their impact int the aquatic...
TRANSCRIPT
Use of a battery of bioassays to classify hazardous wastes and evaluate their impact int the
aquatic environment
Benoit Ferrari1 and Jean–François Ferard2
1 Institut F.-A. Forel, University of Geneva, Switzerland 2 ESE, CNRS FRE 2635, University of Metz, France
UNIVERSITE DE METZ
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
Topics
• Hazardous waste legislation – Where are we now in Europe?• Waste hazardous criteria – Summary• Focus on the H14 criterion “Ecotoxic” – The French proposal• Implementation of the methodology – Case study of two solid
wastes– Ecotoxicological testing approach– Data interpretation– Waste classification
• Interest of the H14 criterion assessment – Case study of two waste deposits– Ecotoxicological approach– Ecological approach
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
Hazardous waste regulatory aspects
Framework Directive on Waste
(Council Directive 91/156/EEC)
Framework Directive on Waste
(Council Directive 91/156/EEC)
•Definition of waste
•Management of waste
•Definition of waste
•Management of waste
Hazardous Waste Directive
(Council Directive 91/689/EEC)
Hazardous Waste Directive
(Council Directive 91/689/EEC)
Waste displaying one or more of 14 defined hazardous properties
(H1 to H14) listed in Annex III
Waste displaying one or more of 14 defined hazardous properties
(H1 to H14) listed in Annex III
Waste containing any constituents listed in Annex II (C1 to C51) and having
one or more hazardous properties
Waste containing any constituents listed in Annex II (C1 to C51) and having
one or more hazardous properties
(e.g. C25 = asbestos)
European Waste Catalogue EWC including the Hazardous Waste List HWL
(Decision 2000/532/EC)
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
The 14 defined hazardous properties
H1 Explosive
H2 Oxidizing
H3A Highly flammable
H3B Flammable
H4 Irritant
H5 Harmful
H6 Toxic
H7 Carcinogenic
H8 Corrosive
H9 Infectious
H10 Teratogenic/toxic for reproduction
H11 Mutagenic
H12Substances and preparations which release toxic or very toxic
gases in contact with water, air or an acid
H13Substances and preparations capable by means, after disposal,
of yielding another substance, e.g. leachate, which possesses any of the characteristics listed above
H14 Ecotoxic
H1 to H3 = physical hazard
H4 to H12 = hazard for human health
H13 = hazard following elimination of waste
H14 = environmental hazard
H1 to H3 = physical hazard
H4 to H12 = hazard for human health
H13 = hazard following elimination of waste
H14 = environmental hazard
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
Assessment of the H14 criterion “Ecotoxic”
The French proposal
(French Ministry of Environment, 1998)
The French proposal
(French Ministry of Environment, 1998)
•C = Concentration
•EC = Effective Concentration
NON–ECOTOXIC
WASTE
HAZARDOUS WASTE
OR
NO
NO
YES
YES
WASTE
Chemical characterization of :
Raw waste
Leachate
Ecotoxicological characterization of:
C > Limit
Values?
Raw wasteLeachate
EC < Limit Values?
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
Example of two solid wastes
Municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash (BA)
EWC/HWL code 19 01 01
Granular (> 4 mm)
Slag from a second smelting of lead (2SL)
EWC/HWL code 10 04 01
Granular (< 4 mm)
Crushing procedure – particle size lower than 4 mm
Evaluation of moisture content (drying at 1055°C until constant weight)
and
Sub–sampling of BA and 2SL for ecotoxicity tests on solid–phase and on eluates
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
Batch leaching procedure: Eluates
Roller rotating device
European standard EN 12457–2 (2002)
Waste (particle size < 4mm)
Deionized Water
Liquid/Solid ratio =10 (on dry weight basis)
100rpm – 24 hours
Settling (15 min)
Centrifugation (10 min – 3500 rpm)
Eluates tested immediately without
filtration and pH adjustment
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
Indirect ecotoxicity testing: Eluates
Procedure for testing BA or 2SL eluates
Measurement of light output inhibition of the bioluminescent bacterium Vibrio fischeri (Microtox™) after 30 min (AFNOR T90–320, 1999) = MTX
Measurement endpoint = EC50
Measurement of mobility inhibition of the cladoceran Daphnia magna after 2 d (AFNOR T90–301, 1996) = Dm
Measurement endpoint = EC50
Measurement of growth inhibition of the algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata after 72 h (AFNOR T90–375, 1998) = Ps
Measurement endpoint = EC20 + EC50
Measurement of reproduction inhibition of the cladoceran Ceriodaphnia dubia after 7 d (EPA 600/4_91/002, 1994) = Cd
Measurement endpoint = EC20 + EC50
Acute tests
Chronic test
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
Direct ecotoxicity testing: Solid–phase
Procedure for testing BA or 2SL
Measurement of growth inhibition of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) after 14 d (OECD 208, 1984) = Ls ger (germination), Ls fb (fresh biomass), Ls db (dry biomass)
Measurement endpoint = EC50
Acute test
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
% E
luat
e
MTX Dm Ps Cd
EC50 EC20
Experimental data: Toxicity of BA (1)
EC50 limit value
(Acute test)
EC20 limit value
(Chronic test)
INDIRECT
Most sensitive test
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
Experimental data: Toxicity of BA (2)
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
% d
ry w
aste
eq
uiv
alen
t
Ls ger Ls fb Ls db
EC50
EC50 limit value
DIRECT
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
Experimental data: Toxicity of 2SL (1)
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
% E
luat
e
MTX Dm Ps Cd
EC50 EC20
EC50 limit value
(Acute test)
EC20 limit value
(Chronic test)
INDIRECT
Most sensitive test
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
Experimental data: Toxicity of 2SL (2)
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
% d
ry w
aste
eq
uiv
alen
t
Ls ger Ls fb Ls db
EC50
EC50 limit value
DIRECT
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
Classification according to H14
BA
2SL
At least 1 bioassay shows a toxicity value inferior to the
fixed limit
3 of the 5 bioassays show toxicity values inferior to
the fixed limits
HAZARDOUS
HAZARDOUS
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
Interest of H14 criterion
• To select the most suitable way for managing waste in the environment
• To warn about the ecotoxicological potential hazard of waste leachates for the aquatic ecosystem
• To ensure that unacceptable adverse effects would not arise from storage, treatment, re–use or disposal of waste
Prerequisite step…
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
Field monitoring: Waste deposits
• 3 fractions: – P0.5, P1, P2 for BA = cumulated quantities of percolates according to L/S
rations of 0.5, 1, 2– P2.5, P5, P7.5 for 2SL = cumulated quantities of percolates according to L/S
rations of 2.5, 5, 7.5
• Tested using bioassays: MTX, Dm, Ps and Cd
• And supplying outdoor artificial streams (5 m, 440 L, 3 concentrations + control) colonized by aquatic invertebrate communities after having percolated through permeable subsoil
BA 2SLAdapted from Perrodin et al. (2002)
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
Field data: Waste deposits (1)
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
EC
50 (
% o
f p
erco
late
)
MTX Dm Ps Cd
P0.5 P1 P2
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
EC
50 (
% o
f p
erco
late
)
MTX Dm Ps Cd
P2.5 P5 P7.5
BA 2SL
Existence of a residual ecotoxicity in the last fraction
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
Field data: Waste deposits (2)
BA 2SL
Significant effects on abundance, richness and emergence of the aquatic invertebrates
Percolates 10–fold diluted by water before supplying
the artificial river
Percolates 100–fold diluted by water before supplying
the artificial river
Perrodin et al. (2002)
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
Field data: Waste deposits (3)
BA 2SL
Long–term ecotoxic potential hazard of leachates for the aquatic ecosystem if no storage management
Ecotoxicological approach + Ecological approach
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005
References• AFNOR 1996 Water quality – Determination of the inhibition of the mobility of Daphnia magna Straus
(Cladocera, Crustacea) – Acute toxicity test. N°T90-301, Association Française de Normalisation, Paris.• AFNOR 1998 Water quality – Determination of water chronic toxicity by growth inhibition of the fresh
water algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (Selenastrum capricornutum). N°T90-375, Association Française de Normalisation, Paris.
• AFNOR 1999 Water quality – Determination of the inhibitory effect of water samples on the light emission of Vibrio fischeri (Luminescent bacteria test) – Part 3: Method using freeze-dried bacteria. N°T90-320-3, Association Française de Normalisation, Paris.
• Council Directive 91/156/EEC of 18 March 1991 amending Directive 75/442/EEC on waste. Official Journal L 078, 26/03/1991, Brussels, 32–7.
• Council Directive 91/689/EEC of 12 December 1991 on hazardous waste. Official Journal L 377, 31/12/1991, Brussels, 20–7.
• EN 12457-2 2002 Characterization of waste – Leaching – Compliance test for leaching of granular waste materials and sludges – Part 2: One-stage batch test at a liquid to solids ratio of 10 l/kg for materials with a particle size below 4 mm (with or without size reduction), CEN/TC292/WG2, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
• EPA 1994 Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater organisms. EPA 600/4_91/002, Environmental Systems Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH.
• French Ministry of Environment 1998 Criteria and methods for the assessment of the ecotoxicity of wastes. French Ministry of Environment/Directorate for Prevention Pollution and Risk Control January, Paris.
• OECD 1984 Guidelines for testing of chemicals: Terrestrial plants, growth test. Document 208, Oragnisation for Economic Co–ordination and Development, Paris.
• Perrodin, Y., Gobbey, A., Grelier-Volatier, L., Canivet, V., Fruget, J.F., Gibert, J., Texier, C., Cluzeau, D., Gros, R., Poly, F. and Jocteur–Monrozier, L. 2002 Waste ecocompatibility in storage and reuse scenarios: global methodology and detailed presentation of the impact study on the recipient environments. Waste Management, 22, 215-228.
curriculum in natural environmental science, 2005