use of high spectral resolution infrared sounders to validate reanalyses
DESCRIPTION
Use of High Spectral Resolution Infrared Sounders to Validate Reanalyses. Mitch Goldberg, Likun Wang NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Satellite Meteorology and Climatology Division. Motivation. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Use of High Spectral Resolution Infrared Sounders to Validate
ReanalysesMitch Goldberg, Likun Wang
NOAA/NESDIS/STARSatellite Meteorology and
Climatology Division
1
Motivation• Many studies comparing AIRS, IASI and aircraft interferometer have
demonstrated the accuracy and stability of AIRS and IASI.
• Finally we have a very precise, accurate reference dataset to validate other datasets, such as radiosondes, model analyses, reanalyses, etc.
• Unlike GPS RO, the thermal infrared radiances are influenced by key essential climate variables:– CO2, CH4, O3, CO, Clouds, Aerosols, Temperature, Moisture.
• CLARREO mission is design to meet this objective, with onboard SI traceability.
• Climate Reanalyses are gaining recognition for providing historical climate information but each are different, why??
3
Wide spread in Projections
4
Need to improve model projections. With benchmark – reference satellite observations, we can insist that the models agree with the satellite observations
AIRS Sensitivity to Atmospheric Change
Approach
• Simulate AIRS IR radiances from Reanalyses and compare with observed AIRS.
• Limiting factors:– How good is AIRS?– How good is the radiative transfer model?
6
01/29/2010 Task140 Brief 7
Double Difference versus SNOs
1) Indirect vs. Direct comparison
2) Warm scenes vs. cold scenes
Four channels
SNOs
Polar Regions
01/29/2010 Task140 Brief 8
Results
GOES-AIRSGOES-IASI
SNO NorthSNO South
Double Difference
6.5µm
10.7µm
12.0µm
13.3µm
IASI-AIRS
Wang et al. 2010, manuscript for GRL
Zero line
9
Statistical results
GOES-11 Ch3
GOES-11 Ch4
GOES-11 Ch5 GOES-12 Ch6
Central Wavelength (µm) 6.7 10.7 12.0 13.3
Double Differences
Sample number 694 688 691 626
Mean (K) -0.0707 -0.0262 -0.041 -0.0751
95% confidence level (K)
0.0052 0.0116 0.0135 0.0124
SNOs Sample number 228 * 228 228 228
Mean (K) -0.011 -0.0624 -0.010 -0.0124
95% confidence level (K)
0.0091 0.0300 0.0295 0.0211
10
11
12
13
14
Temperature channel 1.5 mb peak
15
Temerature channel 40 mb peak
16
Temperature channel 300 mb peak
17
Water vapor channel 300 mb peak
Increasing negative means increase in water vapor
DR = f( DT, DQ)
ERA-Interim versus ECMWFTPW above 500hpa
JRA versus ECMWFTPW above 500hpa
MERRA versus ECMWFTPW above 500hpa
Comparison with TWP ARM Site - Night time – September 2002-2005 N=22
Summary
Datasets have been generated for 5 years data from January 2003:
Summary/Recommendations• AIRS and IASI are reference quality instruments which
can be used to validate climate reanalyses and climate projections.
• Need to continue to improve radiative transfer models via better laboratory spectroscopy and ground truth data (e.g. GRUAN)
• Absolute observations and radiative transfer will allow measurements to be used as anchor points and will allow focus on improving model physics.
23
ERA Interim Reanalysis - ECMWF Weather Analysis – September 2004
ERA Interim Reanalysis - ECMWF Weather Analysis Sept. 2007
ECMWF 2003 – 2005 can be used to validate reanalyses
ERAIM - JRA25 ECMWF - JRA25
JRA25 vs ECMWF and ERA Interim (above 500 mb)