user experience grading in kano categories vincent ter maat uu - 3731340
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: USER EXPERIENCE GRADING IN KANO CATEGORIES Vincent ter Maat UU - 3731340](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c79fbe/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
USER EXPERIENCE GRADING IN KANO CATEGORIESVincent ter Maat
UU - 3731340
![Page 2: USER EXPERIENCE GRADING IN KANO CATEGORIES Vincent ter Maat UU - 3731340](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c79fbe/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What & Why?
Product development• Determine expected customer satisfaction• Focus development based on customers’ needs
Difficult but Kano helps.
![Page 3: USER EXPERIENCE GRADING IN KANO CATEGORIES Vincent ter Maat UU - 3731340](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c79fbe/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
How?• Categorize features into Kano-categories
![Page 4: USER EXPERIENCE GRADING IN KANO CATEGORIES Vincent ter Maat UU - 3731340](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c79fbe/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Steps
Goal: Categorize features into Kano-categories
1. Define what you believe that the possible needs of your customers will be.
2. Construct a questionnaire
3. Evaluate the results (categorize features)
4. Prioritize features and plan the development
![Page 5: USER EXPERIENCE GRADING IN KANO CATEGORIES Vincent ter Maat UU - 3731340](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c79fbe/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Step 1: Define possible needs• Brainstorm
Example: Coffeemachine• Fresh beans instead of pads• Pre-contained cups• Auto-stop coffee flow when cup is full• etc.
![Page 6: USER EXPERIENCE GRADING IN KANO CATEGORIES Vincent ter Maat UU - 3731340](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c79fbe/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Step 2: Construct questionnaire• Consists of functional and dysfunctional questions
1. How would you feel if the coffee machine has an auto-stop feature?
2. How would you feel if the coffee machine hasn’t got an auto-stop feature?
Answers:
like it | must be | neutral | live with it | dislike
![Page 7: USER EXPERIENCE GRADING IN KANO CATEGORIES Vincent ter Maat UU - 3731340](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c79fbe/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Step 3: Evaluate resultsFUNCTIONAL
QUESTION DYSFUNCTIONAL QUESTION
LIKE MUST-BE NEUTRAL LIVE WITH IT DISLIKE
LIKE QUESTIONABLE ATTRACTIVE ATTRACTIVE ATTRACTIVE ONE-DIMENSIONAL
MUST-BE REVERSE INDIFFERENT INDIFFERENT INDIFFERENT MUST-BE
NEUTRAL REVERSE INDIFFERENT INDIFFERENT INDIFFERENT MUST-BE
LIVE WITH IT REVERSE INDIFFERENT INDIFFERENT INDIFFERENT MUST-BE
DISLIKE REVERSE REVERSE REVERSE REVERSE QUESTIONABLE
PRODUCT FEATURES PERCENTAGE OF REPLIES
A O M I R Q TOTAL KANO CATEGORY
(1) COFFEE BEANS 40.0 12.0 11.0 13.0 10.0 14.0 100 ATTRACTIVE
(3) CUPS 12.0 9.0 3.0 20.0 30.0 26.0 100 REVERSE
(4) AUTO STOP 10.0 23.0 40.0 9.0 8.0 10.0 100 MUST-BE
(5) HEATER 15.0 12.0 18.0 6.0 2.0 47.0 100 QUESTIONABLE
![Page 8: USER EXPERIENCE GRADING IN KANO CATEGORIES Vincent ter Maat UU - 3731340](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c79fbe/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Step 4: Prioritize features and plan• Satisfaction:
• Dissatisfaction:
)()()()(
)()(
IInverseMMustBeOonalOneDimensiAAttractive
OonalOneDimensiAAttractive
1
)()()()(
)()(
IInverseMMustBeOonalOneDimensiAAttractive
MMustBeOonalOneDimensi
PRODUCT FEATURES PERCENTAGE OF REPLIES
A O M I TOTAL KANO CATEGORY SATISF. DISSATISF.
(1) COFFEE BEANS 40.0 12.0 11.0 13.0 100 ATTRACTIVE 0.68 -0.30
(3) CUPS 12.0 9.0 3.0 20.0 100 REVERSE 0.44 -0.27
(4) AUTO STOP 10.0 23.0 40.0 9.0 100 MUST-BE 0.40 -0.77
(5) HEATER 15.0 12.0 18.0 6.0 100 QUESTIONABLE 0.40 -0.59
![Page 9: USER EXPERIENCE GRADING IN KANO CATEGORIES Vincent ter Maat UU - 3731340](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c79fbe/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
PDD
![Page 10: USER EXPERIENCE GRADING IN KANO CATEGORIES Vincent ter Maat UU - 3731340](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c79fbe/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Literature• 1984 Introduction (Kano)• 1993 Improved the model (Berger)• 2006 Imperfections and implications and introduction of
self-report approach. (MacDonald)• 2008 literature review of 33 papers. (Lofgren)
![Page 11: USER EXPERIENCE GRADING IN KANO CATEGORIES Vincent ter Maat UU - 3731340](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c79fbe/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Questions