using assistive technology in behavioral research: a comparison of irap input methods
DESCRIPTION
Using Assistive Technology in Behavioral Research: A Comparison of IRAP Input Methods . Lauren Fassero Joi Tucker Karen Kate Kellum Maureen K. Flynn Kelly G. Wilson. Detecting biases. Self-Report. Implicit Association Test. Human. Alien . Not Me. Me. Implicit Association Test. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
UM Center for Contextual Psychology
dedicated to
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Using Assistive Technology in Behavioral Research: A
Comparison of IRAP Input Methods
Lauren FasseroJoi Tucker
Karen Kate KellumMaureen K. FlynnKelly G. Wilson
Detecting biases
Self-Report
Implicit Association Test
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Human Alien
Me Not Me
Implicit Association Test
Human Alien
Not Me Me
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure
Participants Excluded
Alternative Input Methods
Purpose
Two Studies
Procedure
Keyboard
Alternative/Switches
Alternative/Switches
Keyboard
Stimuli
Data Analysis Strategy
Alt Keyboard
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Alt Keyboard Participants
Alt Keyboard Participants
Alt Keyboard Participants
Alt Keyboard Participants
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Number of Participants Not Meeting Inclusion Criteria
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
% Correct on Inconsistent Trials
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
43%
Average Latency of Inconsistent Trials
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
33%
Fluency on Inconsistent Trials
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
67%
Less Bias
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
61.95%
38.05%
Switches
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Switch Participants
Switch Participants
Switch Participants
Switch Participants
Number of Participants Not Meeting Inclusion Criteria
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
% of Participants with More Useable Trials by Input Type
95%
% Correct on Inconsistent Trials
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Average Latency of Inconsistent Trials
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
48%52%
Fluency on Inconsistent Trials
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
52%
Less Bias
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
61.9%
Practice Effects Example
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Summary
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Study 1 Study 2
Summary
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Study 1 Study 2
Limitations
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Future Directions and Conclusions
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
UM Center for Contextual Psychology
dedicated to
World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding
Using Assistive Technology in Behavioral Research: A
Comparison of IRAP Input Methods
Lauren FasseroJoi Tucker
Karen Kate KellumMaureen K. FlynnKelly G. Wilson