using behavior driven development and feature injection to build better software
DESCRIPTION
Jeffrey Davidson @ JeffreyGoodReq goodrequirements.com BBCCon2011:baf November 3, 2011. Using Behavior Driven Development and Feature Injection to Build Better Software. BDD Fundamentals. I can teach you this in less than 1 minute . . . Are you ready? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Using Behavior Driven Development
and Feature Injection to Build Better Software
Jeffrey [email protected]
BBCCon2011:bafNovember 3, 2011
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
BDD Fundamentals
I can teach you this in less than 1 minute . . .
Are you ready?
Seriously. Do you have your pencil ready?
Can someone time me?
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
60 minutes in less than 60 seconds
Without using any technical language…
Describe who you are and what your condition isAnd what you do And how the system responds
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
– –Given
You & Your condition
What you do
What you see
Simple Structure
When
Then
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Given – When – Then
You now know enough to succeed.
Go! Enjoy another session.
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Today’s Agenda…
Fundamentals of BDDFormal definitionWhat is BDD?How to use BDDWhy being less specific is importantBenefits Why you should careWhy BDD isn’t testingMore Fundamentals (Feature Injection)How to use Feature InjectionHow this directly relates to BDD
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Not Today’s Agenda
Discuss BDD Tools Give automation advice Share code quality practices
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
What is BDD?
“BDD is a second-generation, outside-in, pull-based, multiple-stakeholder,
multiple-scale, high-automation, agile methodology. It describes a cycle of
interactions with well-defined outputs, resulting in the delivery of working,
tested software that matters.”Dan North @ Agile Specifications, 2009
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
What is BDD?
Fine grained, focused bits of behavior
Told in a story format
No, really, what is it?
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Stories & Story Format
When you take a few minutes to talk to your co-workers, your boss, your spouse, and your family . . .
. . . do you give facts or context?
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Stories & Story Format
I dream of . . . adventure, challenge, success
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Stories & Story Format
Have you ever dreamed of . . . facts?
Yuck!
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Stories
We use stories to communicate.
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Do you mean User Stories?
“As a . . . , I want . . . , So . . . .”
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
User Stories are Statements
User Stories do not give all the preconditions Or all the actors actions Or all the system responses
Promise of a future conversation
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Two Steps
Start with business goalsIn Agile development, this is a User Statement Story
Build Scenarios
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
– –Given
You & Your condition
What you do
What you see
Simple Structure
When
Then
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Simple Structure
Given [CONTEXT]
When [EVENT OCCURS]
Then [OUTCOME]
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Given
OLD?
NEWGiven I am . . .
<<Who & Where & What has already happened &
etc.>>
State your action in natural language
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
When
OLD?
NEWWhen I <<perform some action>>
State your action in natural language
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
NEWThen I see …
Then
OLDThe system shall …
This is how you observe the system’s response
State your action in natural
language– OR –
WRITE LIKE A HUMAN
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Be Like Aldi
Generic behavior
Don’t include design.
Imagine performing the same actions on a telephone interface!
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Simple Structure
Given [CONTEXT]
When [EVENT OCCURS]
Then [OUTCOME]
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
I want to withdraw $ from ATM (An example)Scenario #1: Account has sufficient funds
Given the account balance is 100 and the card is valid and the machine contains enough moneyWhen the account holder requests 20Then the ATM should dispense 20 and the account balance should be 80 and the card should be returned
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
What is it?
It’s a bunch of tiny stories, using a particular grammatical structure.
It’s finding places of misunderstanding, and filling it with understanding.
It’s a conversation, captured.
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Why?
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Simple Made Easy
“We can only hope to make reliable those things that we can understand.We can only consider a few things at a time. Intertwined things must be considered together. Complexity undermines understanding.”
Rich Hickey @ StrangeLoop 2011
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Built right or Right product?
Gojko Adzic in Specification by Example, 2011
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Benefits
To build the right product effectively, software dev practices need:
Gojko Adzic in Specification by Example, 2011
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Benefits
To build the right product effectively, software dev practices need:
Assurance all stakeholders & delivery team members understand what needs to be delivered in the same way.
Gojko Adzic in Specification by Example, 2011
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Benefits
To build the right product effectively, software dev practices need:
Precise specifications so delivery teams avoid wasteful rework caused by ambiguities and functional gaps.
Gojko Adzic in Specification by Example, 2011
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Benefits
To build the right product effectively, software dev practices need:
An objective means to measure when a piece of work is complete.
Gojko Adzic in Specification by Example, 2011
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Benefits
To build the right product effectively, software dev practices need:
Documentation to facilitate change, in terms of both software features & team structure.
Gojko Adzic in Specification by Example, 2011
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Who Benefits?
Everyone!
Seriously, it helps everyone. • Business • Users • Testers • Developers • Analysts
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Blah, Blah, Blah – Why should I care?
Ferries & Bridges
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Isn’t this just testing?
Seems like TDD to me
“Umm, what’s TDD?”
If you’re doing TDD, then BDD is a great next step.
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Acceptance Test Criteria
Tests code or functionality
Presumes the test is right
Who really cares about the functionality? • It’s an IT term!• Users care about the behavior
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
BDD > TDD
Presumes we don’t know everything
So we ask about scenarios
It’s about behavior • You can only learn about behavior from
conversation Behavior leads to design
“Can you give me an example?”
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Is it like testing?
Sort of…
Specifications are written in such a precise way we can execute them
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Testing Tools
JBehave (java)RSpec, Cucumber (ruby)Lettuce (python) Nbehave & Nspec (.NET)FIT & FitNess (multiple) Etc.
There are lots of tools to use
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
It’s not about tools
“These tools are intended for use by programmers to guide coding, but they can also be used to express business facing tests that drive development, involving customers more closely in the process.”
Lisa Crispin in Agile Testing, 2009
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Downsides
May not help velocity
New
Tools (and all that jazz) may cause clutter, slow-down, new learning, other stuff
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Wait a minute!
What happened to Feature Injection?
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Build Software That Matters
Start with a business goal
Hint: Businesses want to increase, conserve, or protect $.
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Feature Injection
The value of an IT system is in it’s outputs / outcomes
Model based on desired results
Follow Information Smells to identify that may be missing from your model
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Value is what matters
If you want to add value . . .
. . . don’t argue about features
. . . ask about why
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Think like an investor
Every project is an investment.
Picture a Business Investor
Why does your Business Investor want to do this project?
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Why invest?
Avoid penaltyKeep up with the market – competitor Always done this way Want to spend budget to keep it safe Bad PR via social mediaEt cetera
Whatever the reason, know the reason
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Information Smells
1. Item on output, that are not on the model2. Item on model, that are not on the output3. Two pieces of information in one place 4. No relationship5. One to one relationship. Are they the same
thing?6. Many to many ( missing information )7. Undefined functions ( missing information )Chris Matts, to be published soon
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
It’s the same thing
Discussing the Information Smells• Not about do we need this data? • Conversation about what business
needs
Changes the dynamic
Transforms from push to pull
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
BDD: Recap
Start with a goal or User Story
Build scenarios
Automate the testing
Write the code
Have a Coca-Cola and smile
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Feature Injection: Recap
Find the value
Model the output
Follow the Information Smells
Have another Coke!
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Questions
If you waited until now to ask your questions, you missed the best chance for us to have a conversation.
But you should ask anyway…
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Experts
Dan North @tastapod dannorth.net
Chris Matts @PapaChrisMatts theitriskmanager.wordpress.com
Liz Keogh @lunivore lunivore.com
Gojko Adzic @gojkoadzicgojko.net
© Jeffrey Davidson, 2011
Resources
http://www.lulu.com/product/ebook/real-options-at-agile-2009/17416200
This is a really cool comic. You should read
it.
Using Behavior Driven Development
and Feature Injection to Build Better Software
Jeffrey [email protected]
BBCCon2011:bafNovember 3, 2011
Using Behavior Driven Development
and Feature Injection to Build Better Software
Jeffrey [email protected]
BBCCon2011:bafNovember 3, 2011