using gis to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

34
GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic haz Serkan Bozkurt

Upload: niel

Post on 11-Jan-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards. Serkan Bozkurt. -0.6. 0.0 bars. 0.6. animation. animation. animation. animation. 1992 M=7.3 Landers shock increases stress at Big Bear. Landers. Big Bear. Los Angeles. First 3 hr of Landers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

Serkan Bozkurt

Page 2: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards
Page 3: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards
Page 4: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

0.60.0bars

-0.6

animation

Page 5: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

animation

Page 6: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

animation

Page 7: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

animation

Page 8: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

1992 M=7.3 Landers shock increases stress

at Big Bear

LosAngeles

BigBear

Landers

First 3 hr of Landers

aftershocks

plotted

Page 9: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

1992 M=7.3 Landers shock 1992 M=7.3 Landers shock promotes the M=6.5 Big promotes the M=6.5 Big

Bear shock 3 hr laterBear shock 3 hr later

LosAngeles

BigBear

Landers

First 3 hr of Landers

aftershocks

plotted

Page 10: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

……and promotes theand promotes the M=7.1 Hector MineM=7.1 Hector Mine shock 7 yr latershock 7 yr later

LosAngeles

Hector Mine

First 7 yr of

aftershocksplotted

Page 11: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

New ways to forecast seismic shaking, and how they stack up in Tokyo

Earthquake Probability Investigation of Greater Tokyo

Shinji Toda, Masanobu Shishikura, and Kenji Satake

Ross Stein, Serkan Bozkurt, Bill Bakun, Fred Pollitz,Tom Parsons, Marleen Nyst, and Elliot Grunewald

Yoshimitsu Okada

Junichi Nakajima and Akira Hasegawa

Nobuo Hamada

Martin Bertogg, Mariagiovanna Guatteri, Silvio Tschudi,and Atsuhiro Dodo

Takuya Nishimura and Takeshi Sagiya

Page 12: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards
Page 13: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards
Page 14: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards
Page 15: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards
Page 16: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards
Page 17: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

Fault model from Wald and Somerville

Page 18: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

Fault model from M. Matsu’ura et al.

Page 19: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards
Page 20: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

Our model for the 1923 earthquake is based on newly discovered geodetic data

Fault slip (cm)

But the 1703 earthquake was much larger

Marleen Nyst

Fred Pollitz

from Nyst et al (2005) and Pollitz et al (2005)

Slip direction

Tokyo

Page 21: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards
Page 22: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

Kanto seismic corridor

Historical quakes from Usami (2003) reassessed with powerful computer technique

Elliot Grunewald

Bill Bakun

from Bakun (2005)

and Grunewald (in press 2006)

Page 23: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

Ross Stein

Shinji Toda

animation

Page 24: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

Picture

Page 25: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

30-yr earthquake probabilities for greater Tokyo

Team Tokyo Study Poisson Renewal

M≥7.1 within 50 km of Tokyo 20 >35 (1855 type)

M≥7.9 within 100 km of Tokyo (1923 type) 11 0.5

Combined (I≥6 or PGA>0.95 g in Tokyo) 29% >35%

1

2

1

2

from Stein et al.

(2006)

Page 26: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

Tokyo street scene in 1855

Page 27: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

Study area is divided in to 5x5 km cells

Page 28: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

data forone celldata forone cell

Creating the annual frequency-intensity model

Page 29: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

How well the model fits local data

Page 30: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

How well the model fits local data

Page 31: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

How well the model fits local data

Page 32: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

Turning cell data into maps

Page 33: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

What about site effects and proximity to fault ruptures?

Page 34: Using GIS to visualize, analyze and forecast seismic hazards

Residents of Edo appeal to the god Kashima to subdue the catfish, mythical source of the 1855 Ansei-Edo earthquake

GIS is one of the most powerful tools tovisualize, analyze,and enhance earth

science information.

Serkan Bozkurt(USGS, Menlo Park)