2

Using Juvenile Receiving Centers to Improve Safety & Outcomes

September 25, 2014

3

Tips for viewing this webinar:

• The questions box and buttons are on the right side of the webinar window.

• This box can collapse so that you can better view the presentation. To unhide the box, click the arrows on the top left corner of the panel.

• If you are having technical difficulties, please send us a message via the questions box on your right. Our organizer will reply to you privately and help resolve the issue.

4

Webinar Recording and Evaluation Survey

• This webinar is being recorded and will be made available online to view later or review.

• After the webinar, you will see a pop-up box containing a webinar evaluation survey. Thank you in advance for completing this survey. Your feedback is important to us.

5

Question & Answer Session Instructions

• Type your question into the questions box at any time during the presentation, and the moderator will read the question on your behalf during the Q&A session.

6

NACo’s Work with Models for Change

For more information about NACo’s Criminal Justice Programs and to view the recorded webinar, please visit:

http://www.naco.org/justice.

Strategic partnership designed to:

• Build county leadership capacity, expertise, and commitment for juvenile justice reform across the country

• Promote model programs for juvenile justice reform by providing thought leadership, education, technical assistance, and peer networking opportunities to county officials and staff

7

Today’s Speakers: Josh Campbell Calcasieu Parish, La. Kolby Brown Tulsa County, Okla.

Calcasieu Parish Multi-Agency Resource Center

William Sommers, Director Josh Campbell, MARC Manager Calcasieu Parish Police Jury Office of Juvenile Justice Services www.cppj.net

Discussion Overview

History and Development Overview of Structure and Processes Lessons Learned Review of Results

Demographics/Structure Population 197,702 Median Household Income $45,470 Race and Ethnic Categories (2000) Caucasian: (73.6%)

African American: (24.0%) Native American: (0.3%) Asian: (0.6%) Other: (1.5%)

Juvenile Services:

serves six municipalities and nine law enforcement agencies works under the supervision of the Calcasieu Parish Police Jury and serves our Juvenile and Family court through a memorandum of understanding.

Funding Sources

$4,474,638

$90,000 $576,787

$75,000 $106,171

Ad ValoremPrivate FoundationState GrantsInterest IncomeState Rev Sharing

Calcasieu Parish Reform Annie E. Casey Foundation “Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative”

MacArthur Foundation “Models for Change”

Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) – Pilot Site

The Vera Institute, New York, NY observed and documented how the parish currently responds to status offenders. A paper was published on the four elements of Calcasieu’s system that stood out as consistent with national best practice.

“The Need for Change” “In Calcasieu Parish, we realized that although we did not have

the answers, we knew we had a lot of room for improvement. We decided to change the way we do business!”

• Number of juveniles referred to court and/or to detention was not

decreasing • Due to the above, we were not providing effective programming for

our kids • Overall we were not being efficient enough to provide quality

services • We were not always focusing on the “right kids” • Timing in our parish was “ripe” for change

Need for a

Catalyst!

http://www.calcypb.org/

Multi-Agency Resource Center

The center is a collaborative project of the Calcasieu Parish Children and Youth Planning Board Member agencies.

The mission of the MARC is to provide a single entry point and coordinated approach to juvenile services for the youth and families of Calcasieu Parish.

MARC Video: http://youtu.be/59T1CMiBecQ

MARC Goals/Criteria MARC Goals

•Provide youth and families with a single access point. • Provide on-site screening and assessments of youth. • Reduce Law Enforcement processing times. • Reduce time between arrest and intake. • Promote public safety and wellbeing.

MARC Criteria

• Walk-in cases (Families requesting information or assistance) • Status and Delinquent cases • 5-17 years old •Not intoxicated or Injured

Law Enforcement: • Eliminate time spent waiting on parents to arrive at the

station/location. • Fast Custody Exchange – Goal is 12 minutes or less. • Assistance in dealing with Status Offenders. • Reduce recidivism. • 24 hour “Help Line” Community: • Faster processing times from arrest to intake. • Non-traditional hours. • Single Entry Point to reduce service duplication. • Pooling of resources to save Taxpayer Dollars. • Evidence Based programming to address needs. • A data driven center that can be modified to address community needs.

The MARC Benefits

MARC Layout

Secure Area Public Area Staff Area

The MARC Flow-

MARC Process Law Enforcement:

The juvenile is transported and Detention Admission Form is completed.

The case is staffed with the District Attorneys Office.

An intake interview is completed and the JIFF Assessment is administered.

The JIFF Assessment provides a snap-shot of the youths life domains, that guide the Diversion Process.

If the family consents, a diversion program is setup to address pending issues.

If the family declines diversion, the case is staffed the DA’s Office for possible formal charges.

Community Agencies:

Families report to the center. The JIFF is administered and

provided to parties. Any other assessments under

MOU will be administered.

JIFF Assessment

Training: All staff involved in the administration of

the JIFF shall: • Review the JIFF® Quick-Start Guide

and JIFF Assessor Training • Review the JIFF Video- Webinar Video

Administration and Case Plan Development:

All MARC Staff shall be trained on how to administer and utilize the JIFF Software.

Designated JIFF stations will be provided for youth access to the assessment.

The assessment will be administered only to youth over the age of 10.

JIFF Scales

School Picked on By Peers Noncompliance in Home Family Environment Peer Influences Unsafe Community Behavior Feelings Self-Harm Potential Substance Abuse Health Related Needs

MAYSI Assessment Training All staff members involved in the

administration of the MASYI shall complete training on:

View the MAYSI-2 Administration Video Suicide Prevention

Administration:

Upon recommendations from the JIFF Matrix, the Staff Member shall administer the MAYSI.

After reviewing the results of the MAYSI, if scores indicates "Caution" or Warning", one or more the following steps must be taken:

• Case will be staffed with a supervisor. • Case will be staffed with on-site

counselor (if during working hours) • Crisis and Response Team (CART) will be

contacted for further assessment.

MAYSI Scales Alcohol/Drug Use Angry-Irritable Depressed-Anxious Somatic Complaints Suicide Ideation Thought Disturbance Traumatic Experiences

SASSI Assessment Training: Review SASSI

Administration Video and Manuals

Administration: Upon recommendations

from the JIFF Matrix the, staff member shall administer the SASSI-A2.

Only trained staff members will grade the assessment.

SASSI Scales

High Probability Low Probability

Assessing Beyond The Charge JIFF Goals Top 4

School 59% • Improve Grades, Attendance, Addressing Academic

needs

Non-Compliance in Home- 40% • Family Relations / Ungovernable Behavior / Home

Aggression

Unsafe Community Behaviors 18% • Community Aggression / Gang Associations/ Legal

Issues

Feelings- 28% • Depression / Anxiety / Trauma

Case Dispositions Case Outcomes Provide information to families Counsel and release - Counsel the

youth, and close the case. Referral to services to include

evidence based programming that will address the family’s needs.

Pre-Court Diversion - Counsel the youth, require participation in programs, or refer the family to the appropriate and necessary services. The case will be monitored for compliance.

Filing of Petition – staff will consult with Supervisor for possible filing of a formal Petition.

Types of Services Crisis Intervention Shelter Care Big Brothers/Big Sisters Functional Family Therapy Multi-systemic Therapy Shoplifting Accountability Program Evening Reporting Center Teen Court Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment

Data Status of Data

• Youth Served • Foot Traffic

Vera Outcome • Measures/Evaluation

• Processing Times • Recidivism • Service Quality

Intakes By Year

789

1289 1238

150 186 195

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

2011 2012 2013

IntakesPetitions

MARC Foot Traffic By Year

249

476

320

245 214

399

316 309

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Walk Ins StatusReferrals

DelinquentReferrals

LawEnforcement

Referrals

20122013

MARC Outcome Research Questions

Are youth referred to MARC more likely to be successfully diverted compared to prior system youth?

Does MARC produce a net-widening effect? How well are youth assessed and referred to the

appropriate services based on their needs? Did the implementation of MARC increase the

speed of service delivery and case processing of youth?

MARC Benefits

Reduced FINS referrals

MARC Benefits

Reduced time to re-referrals ◦ Pre-MARC days to new referral- 125 ◦ Post-MARC days to new referral- 159

MARC Benefits

Reduced processing times

Lessons Learned

The Art of Listening! “I recall being asked to comment on the issues law enforcement experienced with

juveniles. I distinctly remember explaining that we knew what to do when kids

commit a felony. However, the problem was what to do with guardians when they call and kids won’t clean their rooms, do homework and other non-specific things that were behavioral and not necessarily

criminal” More “Tools in the Toolbox”

Lessons Learned

Engaging Court Officials: • Understand their roles in the system and identify how they will

benefit from reform. • Acknowledge barriers up front and propose practical solutions to

removing them

Engaging School Officials: • Face to face contact works better than emails or phone calls. • Address how this effort aligns with their agency objectives

Engaging Law Enforcement: Engage law enforcement not only from the onset, but at every

stage of reform. A strong foundation only increases sustainability. Acknowledge that system change is reciprocal with Law

Enforcement. This requires a understanding of their operating systems.

Listening to Results “Now that we have the center which is

open it has dramatically changed the process for handling juveniles in our community, as well as provide law

enforcement with a valuable option that enables them to first be able to

keep the juvenile safe and at the same time allow them to return back to their

respective duties.” More “Tools in the Toolbox”

Systemic Cultural Sustainability • Continuous, ongoing training through

the Academy • Reviewing and analyzing the data • Educating the public on the results

Accepting the “My Child” challenge

• It requires understanding, commitment, and tools.

MY CHILD TEST – DO WE PASS?

Questions??? Contact: Josh Campbell Calcasieu Parish Police Jury Office of Juvenile Justice Services P.O. Box 2073 Lake Charles, LA 70602 337-721-3951 jcampbell@cppj.net

Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center

Kolby Brown, Director 911 Civic Center Plaza, Suite C

Tulsa, OK 74103 918-596-7580

Email: KolbyBrown@cityoftulsa.org

Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center Table of Contents

Why CIC was Created History and Background Goal of Community Intervention Centers Mission Juvenile Trends and Statistics Fiscal Year 2015 Funding Simplified Flowchart Voluntary Screening Assessments Community Referrals Juvenile Population Monthly Comparison Law Enforcement Utilization Juveniles Served by Race and Age Group Most Frequent Offenses in Schools Reported Gang Affiliation

Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center Why CIC was Created?

• Create an avenue to intervene with juveniles at risk

of becoming more serious, violent, and chronic offenders.

• Short-term reception facility that will hold juveniles up to not exceeding 24 hours of admission.

• One-stop centralized intake, assessment and referral system for arrested juveniles.

• Bridges the gap between non-secure youth shelters and Juvenile Bureau Detention Centers.

Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center History and Background

• In 1995 representatives from Office of Juvenile

Affairs and Youth Services began discussing the concept of juvenile CIC’s.

• Resulted in the establishment of 8 sites in Oklahoma.

• Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center is the 9th CIC in the state of Oklahoma.

• Joint venture between the Office of Juvenile Affairs, City of Tulsa and Youth Services.

Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center Goal of Community Intervention Centers

• To provide early intervention for juveniles with law

violations including delinquent and misdemeanor charges, who are not eligible for detention.

• To provide a quick drop-off for Law Enforcement Officers – permits officers to return to their duties within 15 minutes.

• To connect juveniles/youth back with their parents

as soon as possible.

Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center

Mission • Assist law enforcement

officers by providing a 24-hour short term retaining facility for quick drop-off of juveniles so officers can return to their duties in the community;

• Provide a safe and secure environment for juveniles who have been arrested;

• Reduce recidivism of juvenile offenders by delivering immediate consequences for delinquent behavior;

• Detect and address the underlying causes of delinquent or problem behavior on the front end as a preventive measure;

• Intervene before problems escalate into chronic or more serious offenses; and

• Create a more effective and efficient alliance between police, parents, juvenile justice and treatment providers.

Juvenile Trends and Statistics

FY 2014 • 1453 Total juveniles served at the CIC

• 736 Juveniles admitted to the CIC

• 629 Juveniles processed and diverted to the Juvenile Bureau Detention Center

• 22 (1.5%) Juveniles paperwork only processed

• 66 (4.5%) Inappropriate (Runaway/DLM Eligible)

• 1145 Docket numbers generated for juveniles

• 13.25 minutes – Average Law Enforcement Officer time

• 149 Assessments scheduled; 57 assessments completed with referrals to community

agencies for counseling, education, medical, mentoring, independent living, and employment resources, etc.

• 657 of 112 (17%) Recidivism – CIC 1st Admits

Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center Fiscal Year 2015 Funding

Office of Juvenile Affairs reduced funding by almost 30%

City of Tulsa reduced funding by 10%

Total loss between our major funders of $111,000 Currently working to confirm other surrounding

municipality funders will continue to support our operation.

Arrest Released To

Parent/Guardian

CIC Processed Screen, Search, Photograph, Fingerprint, Generate Court Docket

Number, Schedule Municipal Court Date

Detention Admitted

CIC Admitted

Community Intervention Center Functions:

•Intake Screening – OJA-5 Assessment •Enter/Update JOLTS •Juvenile Justice Background Information •Secure Signed Promise to Appear •Voluntary Comprehension Assessment •Community Referrals/Follow-Ups •Released to Parent, Guardian or Responsible Adult •Transmit Information to Court Systems

Municipal

Court

District Court

Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center Simplified Flowchart

Voluntary Screenings & Assessments

1. Office of Juvenile Affairs - Initial Screening a. School Status b. Home Safety c. Risk of Suicide d. Substance Abuse

2. Tulsa Area CIC Comprehensive Assessment a. Explore underlying causes of delinquent and problem

behavior b. Helps reduce recidivism c. Generates Community Referrals

Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center Community Referrals

• Youth Services • Adult Learning Service Center • Neighbor for Neighbor • Neighbors Along the Line • Positive Behavior Strategies • Parent/Child Center • YMCA • CASA • Planned Parenthood • Food Handlers Permit • Mentoring to the Max • Man Up! Program • Center for Therapeutic Intervention • Big Brothers/Sisters • Alateen • Life Connection Counseling Center • Child Support Enforcement • Work Force Oklahoma • Talking Leaves Job Corps • Tristesse Grief Counseling • Street School

• Counseling & Recovery Services • Get Reading Oklahoma • Calm Center • Tulsa Dream Center • Cornerstone Car Repair Program • Tulsa Star - Alternative Education • Indian Health Care Resource Center • Twilight Academy Alternative Education • Family and Children’s Services • Catholic Charities • Christ for Humanity • Shadow Mountain • CREOKS Behavioral Health Services • Man Up Program • Oklahoma Counseling Services • Department of Human Services • Girls Inc. of Tulsa County • Metropolitan Tulsa Urban League • Oklahoma Virtual High School • Palmer Drug Abuse Agency • Tulsa County Health Department

Juvenile Population Monthly Comparison

132

129

142

163

136 144

107

127

137 132

111

124 132

110 114

130

89

128

115

132

112

158

126 130 134

139 141 139

115

106 119

82

97

138

113

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

2012

2013

2014

Law Enforcement Frequency by Utilization

Municipality Frequency by Utilization

FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014

Municipality Total YTD % of Use Total YTD % of Use Total YTD % of Use Bixby PD 13 0.8% 4 0.3% 11 0.7% BNSF PD 0 0% 0 0% 3 0.2%

Broken Arrow PD 55 3.5% 59 4% 78 5.4% Claremore PD 0 0% 0 0% 4 0.3% Collinsville PD 5 0.3% 6 0.4% 4 0.3% Glenpool PD 6 0.4% 4 0.3% 3 0.2%

Jenks Campus PD 18 1.1% 7 0.5% 7 0.5% Jenks PD 9 0.6% 14 1% 5 0.3%

OHP 8 0.5% 11 0.7% 11 0.7% Owasso PD 21 1.3% 23 1.6% 13 0.9%

Sand Springs PD 28 1.8% 21 1.4% 40 2.7% Sapulpa PD 1 0.1% 0 0% 0 0% Skiatook PD 0 0% 0 0% 2 0.1% Sperry PD 7 0.4% 2 0.1% 3 0.2%

TCSO 80 5% 63 4.3% 72 5% Tulsa Fire Dept. 4 0.3% 10 0.7% 5 0.3%

Tulsa PD 1168 73.5% 1154 78.5% 1108 76.2% Tulsa – TIA 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Tulsa Pub. Sch. PD 165 10.4% 92 6.2% 84 6% Total 1588 100% 1470 100% 1453 100%

Tulsa Police Department

Detective 1.7%

Gilcrease Division 35%

Mingo Valley Division 31.4%

Riverside Division 29.7%

TPD Gang Unit 2.2% Tulsa Police Divisions

Detective 1.7%

Gilcrease Division 35%

Mingo Valley Division 31.4%

Riverside Division 29.7%

TPD Gang Unit 2.2%

Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center

29%

71%

Juvenile Offenses

Felonies 29%

Misdemeanors71%

46%

51%

2.1% .9%

Juvenile Frequency by Destination

TransferredJBDC 46%

Admittedto CIC 51%

Juveniles Served by Race

Afican American 46%

Asian 0.2%

Caucasian 33.5%

Eastern Indian 0.1%

Hispanic/Latino 13.7%

Multiraial 0.7%

Native American 5.8%

Race of Juveniles

African American 46%

Asian 0.2%

Caucasian 33.5%

Eastern Indian 0.1%

Hispanic/ Latino 13.7%

Multiracial 0.7%

Native American 5.8%

Juveniles Served by Age Group

8 - 11 years old 34

12 - 14 years old 341

15- 17 years old 1078

Total Juveniles By Age Group

8 - 11 years old 34

12 - 14 years old 341

15 - 17 years old 1078

Most Frequent Offenses in Schools

• Aggravated Assault & Battery/ Assault & Battery

• Assault on school employee • Possession CD w/in 1000ft. school • Possession marijuana w/in 1000ft. school • Possession drug paraphernalia • Threaten a violent act

Reported Gang Affiliation

107 Hoover Crip 4 456 Piru Blood 3 52nd Blood 3 54th Hoover Crip 3 57th Garrison Block Crip 1 57th Hoover Crip 6 Blood 23 Central Valley Gangster 5 Crip 15 CUG 13 1 Five Tre 2 Grape St. Crips 1 Hoover Crip 22 Juaritos 2 Juggalos 2

Latin Kings 1 MS-13 1 Neighborhood Crip 12 Norte (Nortenos) 2 Piru Blood 2 Red Mob 2 Shotgun Crip 1 Southside 13 3 Surreno 13 12 Tre Seven 1 Westside Criminals 2 Westside Crips 2 Westside Locos 1 White Fang Mercenary Grp. 1

Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center Other Data and Statistics

Juveniles Frequency by Zip Code Most Frequent Charges Committed In the Community

Most Frequent Charges Community In Schools Juvenile Frequency by School Served

TPS Elementary, Middle, & HS TPS Private Schools

Alternative Schools etc. Other Districts – Surrounding Communities

THE BIG PICTURE

Immediate intervention for juveniles Getting juveniles help quick – community referrals Connecting juveniles with parents/responsible adults Reducing recidivism - deterring future crime Prevention from going to higher levels in the criminal

justice system (Detention, DL Moss etc) Ultimately provides for Safer communities

QUESTIONS

QUESTIONS

MORE QUESTIONS

ANY MORE QUESTIONS

Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center

Kolby Brown, Director 911 Civic Center Plaza, Suite C

Tulsa, OK 74103 918-596-7580

Email: KolbyBrown@cityoftulsa.org

63

Question & Answer Session Instructions

• Type your question into the questions box at any time during the presentation, and the moderator will read the question on your behalf during the Q&A session.

64

NACo 2015 Health, Justice and Public Safety Forum: Optimizing Health, Justice and Public Safety in Your County Join us in Charleston County, SC to learn how to bolster leadership in local health and justice systems. We will discuss:

– Behavioral health interventions – Health coverage and the justice system – Collaborative partnerships – Emergency management roundtable

• When: January 21-23, 2015

• Go to www.naco.org/2015healthjusticeforum for more information

• Contact: Emmanuelle St. Jean, Program Manager at estjean@naco.org or 202.942.4267

65

Thank you for participating in NACo’s webinar.

For more information about

NACo’s Criminal Justice programs, visit: http://www.naco.org/justice

For more information about

Models for Change, visit: http://www.modelsforchange.net/

http://www.naco.org/programs/csd/Pages/Models-for-

Change.aspx

With any questions about this webinar, please contact: krowings@naco.org