using network analysis · etter health together accountable ommunity for health population and...
TRANSCRIPT
CONCLUSIONS
Designing Equitable Health Systems
Using Network Analysis
PROBLEM
Transforming the health care system as required by the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010
“A health system consists of all organizations, people,
and actions whose primary interest is to promote,
restore, or maintain health.” World Health Organization
How can we:
Map the system?
Coordinate actors?
Design a more equitable system?
Stephanie Bultema, Senior Researcher, University of Colorado Denver Center on Network Science
Hadley Morrow, Associate Director of Community Engagement, Better Health Together
Amy Riffe, Epidemiologist 2, Spokane Regional Health District Data Center
Stacy Wenzl, Program Manager, Spokane Regional Health District Data Center
Alison Poulsen, Executive Director, Better Health Together
Ansell, Chris and Alison Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration
Research and Theory 18, no. 4: 543-71.
Berwick, Donald M., Thomas W. Nolan, and John Whittington. 2008. “The Triple Aim: Care, Health, and Cost.” Health
Affairs 27, no. 3: 759-769.
Bryson, John M., Barbara C. Crosby, and Melissa Middleton Stone. 2006. “The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector
Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature.” Special issue Public Administration Review 66, Collaborative Public
Management: 44-55.
Bultema, Stephanie. 2017a. “Better Health Together Community Linkage Mapping: An Assessment of the Regional
Population and Social Determinants of Health Systems. Spokane, WA: Spokane Regional Health District Data Center.
https://srhd.org/media/documents/BHTHealthSystems-AssessmentTechnicalReportOfFindings0.352017.pdf
Carothers, Bobbi J., Amy A. Sorg, and Douglas A. Luke. July 2015. “Baseline Network Assessments: Phase 1.” ReThink
Health. https://www.rethinkhealth.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/09/ networkmapping _rth.pdf
Emerson, Kirk and Tina Nabatchi. 2015. Collaborative Governance Regimes. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Halfon, Neal, Peter Long, Debbie I. Chang, James Hester, Moira Inkelas and Anthony Rodgers. 2014. “Applying a 3.0
Transformation Framework to Guide Large-Scale Health System Reform.” Health Affairs 33, no. 11: 2003-2011.
Heider, Felicia, Taylor Kniffin, and Jill Rosenthal. 2016. “State Levers to Advance Accountable Communities for Health.”
National Academy for State Health Policy, May 2016.
Luke, Douglas A. and Jenine K. Harris. 2007. “Network Analysis in Public Health: History, Methods, and Applications.”
Annual Review of Public Health 28, no. 1: 69–93.
Marmot, Michael, Shron Friel, Ruth Bell, Tanja A.J. Houweling, and Sebastian Taylor. “Closing the Gap in a Generation:
Health Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health.” The Lancet 372, November: 1661-1669.
Provan, Keith G., and H. Brinton Milward. 1995. “A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Effectiveness: A Comparative
Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40, no. 1: 1–33.
Towe, Vivian L., Laura Leviton, Anita Chandra, Jennifer C. Sloan, Margaret Tait, and Tracy Orleans. “Cross-Sector
Collaborations And Partnerships: Essential Ingredients To Help Shape Health And Well-Being Health Affairs 35, no. 11:
1964-1969.
Contact: [email protected]
Interactive web-based maps: https://arcg.is/2pH9kuT | Infographic: create.piktochart.com/output/23176905-web-bht-community-linkage-mapping
Data Collection
Electronic and paper survey
Relational, categorical, and open-ended questions
Survey response rate: 34%
Sample
3-phase snowball sampling method to network bounding
Organizations n=564
Partnerships n=9,039
Linkages n=17,417
Tools
Snap Survey, Gephi, Stata, ArcGIS Online, Piktochart
METHODS RESULTS REFERENCES
POPULATION
Better Health Together
Accountable Community for
Health Population and Social
Determinants of Health Systems
The Accountable Community for Health (ACH) Model is used in the
states of Washington, California, Minnesota, and Vermont.
Coordinating entities, often ACH organizations, provide governance
services for a region of the state. Better Health Together is the ACH
organization in Eastern Washington, which includes 6 counties and 3
tribal nations in urban and rural areas with a population of about
600,000 people.
HEALTH SYSTEM
564 organizations working to
improve individual and
population health for people in
Eastern Washington
Linkage Type
CONTEXT
Business Sector
Education Sector
Public Sector
Health Sector
Social Sector Figure 1 Eastern Washington’s health
system.
Target counties are highlighted in teal.
Each node represents a geocoded
organization. Nodes are sized by average
weighted in-degree and colored by
sector. Edges are colored to match the
sectors they link and are sized by weight.
Nodes outside the state boundary
represent organizations in other states
(not shown by geocoded location).
Diversity
Equity
Centrality
Nodes sized by betweenness centrality.
BHT = orange node
Multiplex Network Collaboration Network
# Orgs #
Interactions
Graph
Density
Avg.
Degree
A.W.
Degree
Network
Diameter
Avg. Path
Length
Avg.
Clustering
Coefficient
BHT 6-County
Region
564 9,039 0.06 16 30.9 4 2.3 0.39
Social Sector 249 1,926 0.03 7.7 14.6 5 2.2 0.31
Health Sector 108 1,091 0.09 10.1 18.5 4 2.1 0.52
Public Sector 103 170 0.02 1.6 3.7 5 2.3 0.12
Education Sector 78 329 0.06 4.2 12.5 4 2 0.48
Business Sector 27 7 0.01 0.3 0.4 5 2.3 0
Collaboration 412 5,050 0.03 12.3 27.3 5 2.2 0.42
Referral 362 2,726 0.02 7.5 12.8 8 3.2 0.17
Data Exchange 235 517 0.01 2.2 3 13 4.5 0.03
Education 223 473 0.01 2.1 2.4 9 2.6 0.05
Financial Support 228 273 0.01 1.2 1.3 4 1.5 0
Adams & Lincoln
County
57 93 0.03 1.6 3.2 4 2 0.13
Northeast Tri-
County
119 401 0.03 3.4 5 5 2.2 0.39
Spokane County 272 3,555 0.05 13.1 25.2 4 2 0.38
Tribal 21 42 0.1 2 3.4 4 1.9 0.36
Regional 95 50 0.05 4.74 11 3 2.2 0.27
Health systems with a
coordinating entity that have
high centrality are associated
with better outcomes.
(Burt 1982; Provan and Milward 1995;
Mitchell and Shortell 2000)
Ensuring equitable
representation of historically
underrepresented groups is a
vital component of successful
health systems.
(Towe et al. 2016; Emerson and Nabatchi
2015)
Collaborative networks
addressing a broad problem
set should have diverse
member representation.
(Mitchell and Shortell 2000; Towe et al.
2016; Emerson and Nabatchi 2015)