utp2.ppt

Upload: ali-clubist

Post on 03-Mar-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    1/47

    Ultrasonic Inspection

    Part 2

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    2/47

    Ultrasonic Test Methods

    Pulse Echo

    Through Transmission

    Transmission with Reflection

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    3/47

    Pulse Echo Testing

    Single probe sends and receives sound

    ives an indication of defect depth and

    dimensions

    !ot fail safe

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    4/47

    "efect Position

    #

    $$

    !o indication from defect # %wrong orientation&

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    5/47

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    6/47

    Through Transmission Testing

    T

    R

    Transmission

    signal

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    7/47

    T

    R

    Transmission

    signal reduced

    Minor"efect ross"efect

    T

    R

    Transmission signal

    disappears

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    8/47

    Through Transmission Testing

    #dvantages

    )ess attenuation

    !o probe ringing

    !o dead *one

    +rientation does not

    matter

    "isadvantages

    "efect not located

    "efect can,t beidentified

    -ertical defects don,t

    show Must be automated

    !eed access to both

    surfaces

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    9/47

    Transmission with Reflection

    T R

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    10/47

    Transmission with Reflection

    T R

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    11/47

    Pulse )ength # short pulse of electricit' is applied to a

    pie*o.electric cr'stal The cr'stal begins to vibration increases

    to ma/imum amplitude and then deca's

    Ma/imum

    01 ofMa/imum

    Pulse length

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    12/47

    Pulse )ength The longer the pulse3 the more

    penetrating the sound

    The shorter the pulse the better the

    sensitivit' and resolution

    Short pulse3 0 or 2 c'cles )ong pulse 02 c'cles

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    13/47

    Ideal Pulse )ength

    4 c'cles for weld testing

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    14/47

    The Sound $eam

    "ead 5one

    !ear 5one or (resnel

    (ar 5one or (raunhofer

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    15/47

    The Sound $eam

    !5 (5

    E/ponential "eca'

    "istance

    Intensit'varies

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    16/47

    Sound $eam

    !ear 5one

    Thic6ness

    measurement

    "etection of defects Si*ing of large

    defects onl'

    (ar 5one

    Thic6ness

    measurement

    "efect detection Si*ing of all defects

    !ear *one length as small as possible

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    17/47

    !ear 5one

    V

    fD

    f

    V

    D

    4Near Zone

    4Near Zone

    2

    2

    =

    =

    =

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    18/47

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    19/47

    !ear 5one

    The bigger the diameter the bigger the

    near *one The higher the fre:uenc' the bigger the

    near *one

    The lower the velocit' the bigger thenear *one

    Should large diameter cr'stal probes have a high

    or low fre:uenc'9

    VfDD

    4

    4Near Zone

    22

    ==

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    20/47

    $eam Spread In the far *one sound pulses spread out

    as the' move awa' from the cr'stal

    DfKV

    DKSine or

    2

    =

    ;2

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    21/47

    $eam Spread

    DfKV

    DKSine or

    2 =

    Edge322

    21d$31?

    @d$34@ $eam a/is

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    22/47

    $eam Spread

    The bigger the diameter the smaller thebeam spread

    The higher the fre:uenc' he smaller the

    beam spread

    DfKV

    DKSine or

    2

    =

    7hich has the larger beam spread3 a compression

    or a shear wave probe9

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    23/47

    $eam Spread 7hat is the beam spread of a 01mm34M8*

    compression wave probe in steel9

    o

    Df

    KV

    Sine

    35.71278.0

    105000

    592008.1

    2

    ==

    =

    =

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    24/47

    Testing close to side walls

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    25/47

    Testing close to side walls

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    26/47

    Testing close to side walls

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    27/47

    Sound at an Interface

    Sound will be either transmitted acrossor reflected bac6

    Reflected

    Transmitted

    Interface

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    28/47

    Inclined incidence%not at A1o&

    #ngle of Incidence = #ngle of Reflection

    @1o @1o

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    29/47

    Inclined incidence%not at A1o&

    @1o @1o

    BompBomp

    Shear

    Mode Bonversion

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    30/47

    Inclined incidence%not at A1o&

    Incident

    Transmitted

    The sound is refracted due to differences in

    sound velocit' in the 2 materials

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    31/47

    Snell,s )aw

    I

    R

    Material 1

    Material 2

    2Materialin

    1Material

    Vel

    inVel

    RSine

    ISine=

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    32/47

    Snell,s )aw

    C

    Perspex

    Steel

    C

    20

    48.3

    2Materialin

    1Material

    Vel

    inVel

    RSine

    ISine=

    5960

    2730

    48.3

    20=

    SineSine

    4580.04580.0 =

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    33/47

    Snell,s )aw

    C

    Perspex

    Steel

    C

    15

    34.4

    2Materialin

    1Material

    VelinVel

    RSineISine =

    5960

    2730

    R

    15=

    Sine

    Sine

    2730

    596015SinSinR =

    565.0=SinR

    4.34=R

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    34/47

    Snell,s )awC

    Perspex

    Steel

    C

    20

    S

    48.3

    24

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    35/47

    0st Britical #ngle

    C

    27.4

    S

    33

    C Bompression wave refractedat A1 degrees

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    36/47

    2nd Britical #ngle

    C

    S (Surface Wave

    !0

    C

    Shear wave refracted at A1 degrees

    57

    Shear wave becomes a surface wave

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    37/47

    0st Britical #ngle Balculation

    C

    Perspex

    SteelC

    5960

    2730

    90

    I=

    SineSine

    5960

    2730=SinI

    458.0=SinI

    26.27=I

    S

    190 =Sin

    27.2

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    38/47

    2nd Britical #ngle Balculation

    C

    Perspex

    Steel

    C

    3240

    2730

    90

    I =SineSine

    3240

    2730=SinI

    8425.0=SinI

    4.57=I

    S190 =Sin

    57.4

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    39/47

    Summar'

    Standard angle probes between 0st and

    2nd critical angles %C43@13D1&

    Stated angle is refracted angle in steel

    0st critical angle compression

    refracted at A1 degrees

    2nd critical angle shear refracted at A1

    2nd critical angle produces surface

    waves

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    40/47

    Snell,s )aw Balculate the 0st critical angle for a

    perspe/;copper interface

    - Bomp perspe/ F 2DG1m;sec

    - Bomp copper F CD11m;sec

    5.355808.04700

    2730===SinI

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    41/47

    #utomated Inspections

    Pulse Echo

    Through Transmission

    Transmission with Reflection

    Bontact scanning

    ap scanning

    Immersion testing

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    42/47

    ap Scanning

    Probe held a fi/ed distance above thesurface %0 or 2mm&

    Bouplant is fed into the gap

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    43/47

    Immersion Testing

    Bomponent is placed in a water filled tan6

    Item is scanned with a probe at a fi/ed

    distance above the surface

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    44/47

    Immersion Testing

    7ater path distance

    (ront surface $ac6 surface

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    45/47

    Immersion Testing

    #ngulation

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    46/47

    Ultrasonic "ispla's # scan

    $ scan End -iew

    B scan Plan -iew

    " scan Side -iew

  • 7/26/2019 UTP2.PPT

    47/47

    2Materialin

    1Material

    Vel

    inVel

    RSine

    ISine=

    Df

    KV

    D

    KSine or

    2

    =

    V

    fDD

    4

    4Near Zone

    22

    ==