kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu results: course level fall 2009 college of professional studies #...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies
# ltemText
1. Stimulated student thinking
2. Explained course objectives & outcomes
3. Explained course requirements and evaluation crit$ria
4. Presented material in an organized manner
5. Made good use of community resources
6. Spoke clearly and audibly
7. Encouraged questions and treated them respectfujlly
8. Created a classroom environment conducive to le; rnin~
9. Kept discussion on track
10. Was prepared for sessions with students
11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter
PSYC 336-01 (000818)
Kerry Kleyman
Fall 2009 FY20103
Response Options #of
Responses %of Resps
Cum% for Item
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Seldom
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Seldom
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Seldom
N/A
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Always
Usually
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Always
Usually
Sometimes
Always
Usually
Sometimes
14
8
2
13
8
2
1
12
7
4
16
4
3
1
12
7
2
2
1
19
4
1
21
3
19
3
2
12
58.33%
33.33%
58.33%
91.67%
8.33% 100.00%
54.17% 54.17%
33.33% 87.50%
8.33% 95.83%
4.17% 100.00%
52.17% 52.17%
30.43% 82.61%
17.39% 100.00%
66.67% 66.67%
16.67% 83.33%
12.50% 95.83%
4.17% 100.00%
50.00% 50.00%
29.17% 79.17%
8.33% 87.50%
8.33% 95.83%
4.17% 100.00%
79.17% 79.17%
16.67% 95.83%
4.17% 100.00%
87 .50% 87.50%
12.50% 100.00%
79.17% 79.17%
12.50% 91.67%
8.33% 100.00%
50.00% 50.00%
10 41.67% 91.67%
2
17
5
2
8.33% 100.00%
70.83% 70.83%
20.83% 91.67%
8.33% 100.00%
16 66.67% 66.67%
7 29.17% 95.83%
1 4.17% 100.00%
12. Was fair and respectful with regard to age, gende , rac~, ethnicity, religion, Always 21 87.50% 87.50% disabilities, and sexual preference
Usually 3 12.50% 100.00%
Office of Institutional Research 1/21~2010 8:37:47 AM Page 183
![Page 2: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies
# ltemText
13. Defined assignments clearly and carefully
14. Provided helpful written responses on student's work
15. Informed students of their progress in time to correct deficiencies
16. Facilitated students' active involvement in learning
17. Designed assignments and tests to increase understanding and application
18. Held class as scheduled
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
20. How much have you learned in this course?
PSYC 336-01 (000818)
Kerry Kleyman
Fall 2009 FY20103
#of Response Options Responses
Always 11
Usually 5
Sometimes 5
Seldom 3
Always 17
Usually 3
Sometimes 4
Always 13
Usually 7
Sometimes 1
Seldom 2
Always 13
Usually 8
Sometimes 1
Seldom 1
Always 15
Usually 7
Sometimes 1
Seldom 1
Always 24
Excellent 13
Very Good 9
Good 1
Poor 1
Exceptional Amount 4
Very Much 16
Much 2
Some 1
Little 1
Yes 24
%of Cum% Resps for Item
45.83% 45.83%
20.83% 66.67%
20.83% 87.50%
12.50% 100.00%
70.83% 70.83%
12.50% 83.33%
16.67% 100.00%
56.52% 56.52%
30.43% 86.96%
4.35% 91.30%
8.70% 100.00%
56.52% 56.52%
34.78% 91.30%
4.35% 95.65%
4.35% 100.00%
62.50% 62.50%
29.17% 91.67%
4.17% 95.83%
4.17% 100.00%
100.00% 100.00%
54.17% 54.17%
37.50% 91.67%
4.17% 95.83%
4.17% 100.00%
16.67% 16.67%
66.67% 83.33%
8.33% 91.67%
4.17% 95.83%
4.17% 100.00%
100.00% 100.00% 21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
22. How important was class attendance to understanding the subject? Very 13 54.17% 54.17%
Somewhat 7 29.17% 83.33%
Not Very 4 16.67% 100.00%
23. How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class? 3 or less 4 16.67% 16.67%
4 to 6 17 70.83% 87.50%
11to15 3 12.50% 100.00%
24. How would you rate the quality of the classroom space? Very Good 10 41.67% 41.67%
Good 11 45.83% 87.50%
Satisfactory 3 12.50% 100.00%
Office of Institutional Research 1/21/2010 8:37:47 AM Page 184
![Page 3: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
liQ Re.suits: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies
PSYC 336-01 (000818)
Kerry Kleyman
Fall 2009 FY20103
# ltemText Response Options #of
Responses
Statistics # Item Text 1. Stimulated student thinking
2. Explained course objectives & outcomes
3. Explained course requirements and evaluatio~ criteria
4. Presented material in an organized manner
5. Made good use of community resources
6. Spoke clearly and audibly
7. Encouraged questions and treated them resp~ctful y
8. Created a classroom environment conducive o lea ning
9. Kept discussion on track
10. Was prepared for sessions with students
11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matter
12. Was fair and respectful with regard to age, g~nder race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, and sexual preference
13. Defined assignments clearly and carefully
14. Provided helpful written responses on studer t's wprk
15. Informed students of their progress in time tc corrf:!ct deficiencies
16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le~ rni~
17. Designed assignments and tests to increase ynderstanding and application
18. Held class as scheduled
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
20. How much have you learned in this course?
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting?
22. How important was class attendance to und~ rstaf'lding the subject?
23. How many hours per week did you typically pend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality of the classr porn space?
Enc of results for Course ID 000818
Office of Institutional Research 1/2112010 8:37:47 AM
Valid Mean SD 24 1.50 0.66
24 1.63 0.82
23 1.65 0.78
24 1.54 0.88
23 1.74 0.96
24 1.25 0.53
24 1.13 0.34
24 1.29 0.62
24 1.58 0.65
24 1.38 0.65
24 1.38 0.58
24 1.13 0.34
24 2.00 1.10
24 1.46 0.78
23 1.65 0.93
23 1.57 0.79
24 1.50 0.78
24 1.00 0.00
24 1.58 0.78
24 2.13 0.90
24 1.00 0.00
24 1.63 0.77
24 2.08 0.83
24 1.71 0.69
%of Cum% Resps for Item
Page 185
![Page 4: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
llQ Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies
# ltemText
Office of Institutional Research 1/21/2010 8:37:47 AM
PSVC 336-01 {000818)
Kerry Kleyman
Fall 2009 FV20103
Response Options #of
Responses %of Cum% Resps for Item
Page 186
![Page 5: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Metropol.it~ II Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruversrty riumrrn
Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an ny ous.
Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School
---------2 0 1 0 r3J CD First College -• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -• Fill response ovals completely - do
not use V's or Xs to mark choices. CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -
• @ @ @ O Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -
© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP
• ® ® ® ® (J) (J) (J) (J)
® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®
Not Applicable Never
Sometimes
The Instructor: • .l:[~t1.al1y. Always :> .·
..................................... ~ .. -.-.. -.-.. -.-.. -.-.. ~. ob•oo 0 1. Stimulated student thinking. 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... e O O 0 0 O 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . ............................. O O O Q 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... 000000 5. Made good use of community resource . . ........................................ 0 d 0 ~ 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly ...................................................... oO•doo 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ o•oooo 8. Created a classroom environment conduciv to learning ............................. 000000 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... 0 ··· 0 O 0 0
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ...................................... 0 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ 0 ti 0 d 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,
and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ . 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefully. . ....................................... 0 C) 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on ude ts' work ................................ 00 000 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O e O O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming .................................. OOOeOO 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. 000 00 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 O d 0 0
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
O Excellent OVery Good •Good OPoor O Very Poor
20 How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount O Very Much OMuch •Some O Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? OYes ONo
--------------.; -:. -----· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week
did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?
OVery 0 Somewhat •Not Very 0 Not at All
• 3 or Less O 11 to 15 O 4 to 6 O 16 or More 07to10
of the classroom space? O Very Good •Good O Satisfactory O Unacceptable
---
![Page 6: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
J_ e '2)0Lte~ V\.9_.;lr Tr>eX-S: d'v\61 \ \ \-q OV\ eJ2.., .;'..? \'\J__. \oR_ CCVVv~. <2..~J\r-\-l' ...... b t-e. '
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
~ ~ e,.S.S<gn 'N\.e.,\'\-\& d U{'\ Y\~ 6YU. ~-~ .\e.r, b'IL\YI ~ \ \. ~ ~-Y\.,~ ~-~ -\~.
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 7: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Metropolitan lfll Inst ucl ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty [[lcmm1
---Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer
---questions on both sides. All responses are an n --Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.
• Answer questions on both sides.
The Instructor:
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
O Excellent •veryGood OGood O Poor O Very Poor
22. How important was class attendance for understanding the subject?
OVery e Somewhat O Not Very 0 Not at All
2 ® CD
• ® © ® ® CJ)
® ®
20 How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount every Much O Much OSome O Little
0
• CD @
® © ® ® CJ)
® ®
23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?
1 ®
• @
® © ® ® CJ)
® ®
• 3 or Less O 11 to 15
0
• CD @
® © ® ® CJ)
® ®
O 4 to 6 O 16 or More 0 7 to 10
'Q CD First College -@ Arts & Sciences -CD SU ® Management -e Prof. Studies -• FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® SP ------Not Applicable -
Never -.-----'~~---,----,..,----,,
Seldom -.---~~-~~-----'--,.
Sometimes
UsiI~llf
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo
------: -.----· -· ---------------------24. How would you rate the quality -
of the classroom space? •veryGood OGood 0 Satisfactory O Unacceptable
---
![Page 8: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
-f vt/\"1, kff tw 111-/ffesf(d 111
lh#:letio.1 .
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
WJ.
Thank you.for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 9: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Metropol~t~ II Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty (irmmu ---Metropolitan State University would like in onn tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be
used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are an n
• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.
• Answer questions on both sides.
•
--Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -2 0 1 0 3 CD First College -® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -
• ® ® ® • Prof. Studies -® ® ® ® I~ FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP -® ® ® ® -(}) (}) (}) (}) -® ® ® ® -® ® ® ® --Not Applicable -
Never -...-.-'~~~ .. -,:,,-_,s~,e~1d-Om-... ~'.~ ..
Sometimes --The Instructor: Always -c 1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... • O O O 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... e O O O O O 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . ............................. • Q 0 Q 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... !f Q 0 Q 0 0 5. Made good use of community resource . . ........................................ 0 Q 0 O 0 • 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... <9 0 0 b 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ •OOOOO 8. Created a classroom environment conduciv to learning ............................. <f QOOOO 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... <e 0 0 Q 0 0
10. Was prepared for sessions with stud en s. . ...................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ • Q 0 Q 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, . . .·· ..
and sexual orientation ....................................................... eoopoo 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefully ......................................... <800000 14. Provided helpful written responses on ude ts' work ................................ •OOOOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 O O O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . () 0 6 0 O 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. <1100000 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... @JQOQOO
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
@Excellent O Very Good OGood 0 Poor O Very Poor
20 How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount •Very Much OMuch OSome O Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? eves ONo
-: _; .. .•
-~· -~ .. ,: ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week
did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -
for understanding the subject? fi Very 0 Somewhat O Not Very O Not at All
O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 O 16 or More 07to10
of the classroom space? •Very Good OGood O Satisfactory O Unacceptable
---
![Page 10: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
I' n ·te_es+t /1'5' ho__d CiL-t'
~/) +o l,~si-<2._c-J
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 11: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Metropolitan Ill Inst Lclional Improvement Questionnaire State Umvers1ty rrmmrn
Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urric lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n
Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School
---------• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
2 0 1 0 r :;i CD First College -
® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -• Fill response ovals completely - do
not use vs or Xs to mark choices. CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -
• @ @ @ • Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -
® ® ® ® ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® (J) (J) (J) (J)
® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®
The Instructor:
® SP
Not Applicable Never
Seldom Sometimes
··• .· l,J"su11Iiy. Always · ....
1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... @ Q O () O 0 2. Explained course objectives and outco~ es. . ......................................• Q 0 () 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . ............................. • Q 0 Q 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized majner. ...................................... *OOQOO 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... 0 Q 0 Q 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the I' res ectfully. . .............................. • O 0 Q 0 0 8. Created a classroom environment condltciv to learning. . ........................... • O 0 Q 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track .................................................... eOOOOO
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s ........................................ 9>QOOOO 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ • 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,
and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • 0 O 0 O 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... • O 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . .............................. • Q 0 0 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lO 6 O () O 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . ................................ • Q 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. ie60QOO 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
• Excellent OVery Good OGood 0 Poor 0 Very Poor
20 How much have you learned in this course? 0 Exceptional Amount 9 Very Much OMuch OSome 0 Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? eves ONo
------------.: -·~ -·----t -;: -· -· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week
did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?
every O Somewhat O Not Very 0 Not at All
0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10
of the classroom space? -t9 Very Good -OGood -0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -
![Page 12: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 13: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Metropolitan 111 Inst le ional Improvement Questionnaire State University ~
Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n
Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School
---------• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
2 0 1 0 3 CD First College -® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -
• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.
CD CD • CD CD SU @ Management -
• @ @ @ • Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. @ @ @ @ • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -
© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® SP
-
® ® ® ® CV CV CV CV ® ® ® ® CV CV CV CV
l Not Applicable
l l J i_-:: 2-• Seld:~ver
Sometimes
. L ~ {Jsually : I
l Always C ,•: The Instructor:
1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... 8 O O O O O 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... O O O () O O 3. Explained course requirements and evailuati n criteria. . ............................. O Q 0 Q 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized maj1rlmer. ...................................... <DO Op 0 0 5. Made good use of community resource . . ........................................ 0 Q 0 Q 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and .audibly. . .................................................... ~ O O 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res· ectfully ................................ 900000 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... t& Q 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • 0 0 0 0 0
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ...................................... ~ 0 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .. ·.. ,-.·.
and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • Q 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... ID O 0 () 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . .............................. • O 0 O 0 0 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ O O d O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . ................................ ~ () O O O O 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. f!>OOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... ~00000
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
•Excellent OVeryGood OGood 0 Poor O Very Poor
20 How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount (jj Very Much 0 Much OSome 0 Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? Cl Yes ONo
-----------_ .. __ , ----. ------· ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week
did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject? •very 0 Somewhat O Not Very O Not at All
0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 9 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10
of the classroom space? •veryGood OGood 0 Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable
---
![Page 14: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
u~'f r fllhePJ~
'j oJJ I !Ii f1f!0~
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 15: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Metropol_it~ 0 Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty !icmm[J
Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an ny ous.
• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.
• Answer questions on both sides.
•
-Fiscal Year/Tr _?_ laJ L1.. £l la_ -1~ ·~ 1= V' 112 ® • ® • CD CD • CD CD SU
• CD CD CD ® ® ® ® • FA © © © © ® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® (j) (j) (j) (j)
® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®
Course College/ School
CD First College CD Arts & Sciences ® Management e. Prof. Studies ® Nursing & Hlth_ Sci. ® Law Enf./Crim. Just.
---------------------Not Applicable -
Never -;--'~---,-,.----,----,
·.>.Seldom -.-----''-"---~---'-~--.
Sometimes
The Instructor:
1. Stimulated student thinking. 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ..................................... . 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . _ ... __ ... _ ... _ ... __ ... _ ...... O O O 6 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ......... _ ....... _ ... - ........ _ ... - ... • Q O Q 0 0 5. Made good use of community resource . . ................................... , .... • () 0 () 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .......................... _ ......................... ~ 6 O 6 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ..... _.......................... (JOQOO 8. Created a classroom environment conduciv to learning .......... _ ... _ ........ _ ..... ~()0000 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... - ................ - .......... ~ 0 0 Q 0 0
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ............ - ......................... • 0 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ '8 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, · . ·
and sexual orientation ..... - ................................. - .............. eooooo 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefully ...................... _ ........ _ ......... 4tOO()OO 14. Provided helpful written responses on ude ts' work ................................ ~OOQOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ O O O O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le rning ............... _ .................. ~00000 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. @00000 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . QO()OO
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
@Excellent O Very Good OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor
20 How much have you learned in this course? G Exceptional Amount O Very Much OMuch osome O Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? ~Yes
ONo
----,_ -, -( --( -(
-L -1:
( ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -
for understanding the subject? OVery O Somewhat <IP Not Very 0 Not at All
~ 3 or Less O 11 to 15 O 4 to 6 O 16 or More O 7 to 10
of the classroom space? O Very Good OGood O Satisfactory O Unacceptable
---
![Page 16: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA • OMR. Survey Systems • www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 17: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Metropolitan ~ I Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State University - ---Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be
used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are an n
• Please use pencil or blue/black ink. • Fill response ovals completely - do
not use ti's or Xs to mark choices.
• Answer questions on both sides.
Fiscal Year/Tr
2 0 1 0 r~ @ • @ • CD CD • CD CD SU
• ® ® ® ® ® ® ® • FA @ @ @ @
® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® (i) (i) (i) (i)
® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®
--Course College/ School -CD First College -® Arts & Sciences -® Management -• Prof. Studies -® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -
Not Applicable Never
Seldom Sometimes Usµ:aµy
-----------. The Instructor: Always
i -··~ 1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... O · 0 O 0 O --'• -2. Explained course objectives and outco ~es. . ...................................... O .~ 0 O 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eva uati n criteria. . ............................. 0 ·.· .. 0 0.·· .· 0 0 -c 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... O 0 0 O 0 0 5. Made good use of community resource]. . . . ..................................... O • O Q 0 O 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... 0 ~ 0 b 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the I' res ectfully ................................ eQOQOO 8. Created a classroom environment conduciv to learning. . ........................... 0 • 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... O 0 0 0 0 0
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... 0 f& 0 0 0 0 11 . Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ O (ft 0 Q 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,
and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00000 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... 0 • 0 Q 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work ................................ eOOQOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O • O O O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming .................................. 000000 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc ease understanding and application .............. Oi80000 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................................... 0 c:> 0 0 0 0
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
O Excellent OVery Good OGood 0 Poor 0 Very Poor
20. How much have you learned in this course? 0 Exceptional Amount 0 Very Much OMuch OSome 0 Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo
-·: --·: -· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject? •Very O Somewhat 0 Not Very O Not at All
0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10
of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -OGood -• Satisfactory Viii?,. -0 Unacceptable ~R -
![Page 18: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 19: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Metropolitan D Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State University 1iITWfillj
Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n
Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School
• Please use pencil or blue/black ink. • Fill response ovals completely - do
not use V's or Xs to mark choices.
• Answer questions on both sides.
The Instructor:
2 0 @ • CD CD
• ® ® ® © © ® ® ® ® (j) (j)
® ® ® ®
CD First College 1 0 =--; _, @ • ® Arts & Sciences
• CD CD SU ® Management ® ® e Prof. Studies ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. ®CI ® ® l
(j) (j)
® ® ® ®
l Not Applicable
Never
Seldom J Sometimes · 1
l .. :::_ "'" :_ Usua11Yc. 1 •.
l Always I; 1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... e O O 0 O O 2. Explained course objectives and outco~es ........................................ o•oooo 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . ............................. O • O Q O O 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... 0 O e O 0 0 5. Made good use of community resource . . ........................................ 0 • 0 O 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly ...................................................... 090000 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res· ectfully ................................ eOO()OO 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... e O O 0 0 O 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... O • 0 O 0 O
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ...................................... O 9 O O O O 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ • 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .
and sexual orientation ...................................................... eOOOOO 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... 0 0 • 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work ................................ oq14t1600 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies ...................... 000000 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . ................................ O 8 O O O O 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. 000000 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... @OOOOO
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
O Excellent •Very Good OGood 0 Poor O Very Poor
20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount every Much OMuch osome O Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? ifl'Yes ONo
---------------------------··· _,. -··· -· -.: ----· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week
did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?
OVery •Somewhat O Not Very O Not at All
O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 e 4 to 6 O 16 or More 0 7 to 10
of the classroom space? ei Very Good OGood O Satisfactory O Unacceptable
---
![Page 20: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 21: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Metropol.itap. II Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty [i!cmrrn
---Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer
---questions on both sides. All responses are an n
• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.
• Answer questions on both sides.
--Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -2 0 1 0 .3 CD First College -® • ® • Ci> Arts & Sciences -CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -
• Ci> Ci> Ci> \Ii) Prof. Studies -® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -© © © © @ Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP -@ @ @ @ -<}) <}) <}) <}) -® ® ® ® -CV CV CV CV ---l Not Applicable
_[ Never -l .·.· ·· ... _:_::_ •:z ~e1d.0B1; J Sometimes • ---The Instructor: l , ,~ . ·.. !Js11aqY,~
1
[ Always I 1
: -·-1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... O • O d O O -·-·-2. Explained course objectives and outco es ........................................ <lOQOQOO -3. Explained course requirements and ev ·luati n criteria. . ............................. • 0 O o 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... O • O q 0 O 5. Made good use of community resource . . ........................................ 0 • 0 O 0 0 -L 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... • .6 O O 0 O 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ 900000 8. Created a classroom environment conduciv to learning ............................. •OOOOO 9. Kept discussion on track .................................................... O<ltOQOO
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ...................................... 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ 0 O 0 O 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, •···
and sexual orientation ...................................................... eooooo 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... 0 6 ti» Q 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . .............................. • 6 O 0 O O 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O ·riWJ Ob O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming .................................. 000000 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. iDOOQOO 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................................... <I> 6 0 d 0 0
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
O Excellent every Good OGood 0 Poor 0 Very Poor
20 How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount ~Very Much OMuch osome O Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo
-(
-.: ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?
OVery ~Somewhat
0 Not Very O Not at All
O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 O 16 or More 0 7 to 10
of the classroom space? iS Very Good OGood O Satisfactory O Unacceptable
---
![Page 22: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA • OMR Survey Systems • www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 23: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Metropolitan 0 Inst j c ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty mmm_u
---Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer
---questions on both sides. All responses are an n --Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
• Fill response ovals completely - do not use Vs or Xs to mark choices.
• Answer questions on both sides.
The Instructor:
2 ® CD
• ® © ® ® CV ® ®
0 1
• ® CD • ® ® ® ® © © ® ® ® ® CV CV ® ® ® ®
1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................... . 2. Explained course objectives and outco~es ........................ . 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . ............. . 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. . ..................... . 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................... . 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . ................................... . 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................ . 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........... . 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... .
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ...................... . 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................ . 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion,
and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... . 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................... . 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work ................ . 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . .... . 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . ................ .
0 '':< CD First College -• ® Arts & Sciences -CD CD SU ® Management -® • Prof. Studies -® • F,A ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -© ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® SP -® -CV -® -® --l Not Applicable ---l Never
l . Seldom ---l Sometimes
l ''-';; .• c. ··•Usual!~ L l Always I···•!
•• 6 0 0 0 0 -•• Q 0 0 0 0 -.. • 0 0 0 0 0 -~ @) 0 0 0 0 0
_, 0 ~ 0 Q 0 0 -·· .. •• 0 0 0 0 0 -;
.. • Q 0 0 0 0 _,
• 0 0 0 0 0 -0 • 0 Q 0 0 -• 0 0 0 0 0 -• () 0 0 0 0 -disabilities, --.. • 0 0 0 0 0 -............... • 0 0 0 0 0 ---............... • 0 0 () 0 0 ............... != 0 0 d 0 0 ............... d 0 0 0 0 -17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .0 • 0 0 0 0
() 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................... .
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
•Excellent O Very Good OGood 0 Poor O Very Poor
22. How important was class attendance for understanding the subject?
OVery ~Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All
20. How much have you learned in this course? 6 Exceptional Amount O Very Much 91 Much OSome 0 Little
23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class? 0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 e 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10
.. •• 0 0 0 0
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo
----------24. How would you rate the quality -of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -iaiGood -0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -
![Page 24: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 25: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Metropolitan II Inst Le ional Improvement Questionnaire State University tmW{[c[j
Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n
Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School
---------• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
2 0 1 0 3 CD First College -® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -
• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.
G) G) • G) G) SU ® Management -
• @ @ @ . e Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -
© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® (J) (J) (J) (J)
® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®
Not Applicable Never
Seldom Sometimes
The Instructor: Always .. ·· :.
1. Stimulated student thinking ...................................... -. -.. -.-.-. -.. -.-.-. -.. -.~. eb O O O O 2. Explained course objectives and outcoj es. . ...................................... 9 0 O 0 0 O 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . ............................. e () 0 Q 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized majner. ...................................... e O 0 Q 0 0 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... O Q 0 Q 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the r res ectfully. . .............................. e 0 ...... 0 0·. ····.·.: 0 0 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ...................................... ti 0 0 0 0 0 11 . Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ • 0 0 Q 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .···.. '"
and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • 0 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly ......................................... eoo()oo 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OOQOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 0 O Q O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming .................................. 600000 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. •QOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled. . ..................................................... • 0 0 0 0 0
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
•Excellent OVery Good OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor
20. How much have you learned in this course? •Exceptional Amount OVery Much OMuch OSome 0 Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? .eves ONo
-------------, -.:. --·· -· -'· -·· ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week
did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?
every O Somewhat 0 Not Very O Not at All
0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10
of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -OGood -it Satisfactory -0 Unacceptable @R •
![Page 26: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
Thank you.for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 27: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Metropolitan IJI Inst le ional Improvement Questionnaire State University !i!u~hcu ---Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be
used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are an n
• Please use pencil or blue/black ink. • Fill response ovals completely - do
not use lls or Xs to mark choices.
• Answer questions on both sides.
•
•@@® 1 CDCDCDeCD 2@@@@@
3@@®®® 4@@©©© s®®®®® 6@@®®® 700000 s@@e@e 9®®®®®
Fiscal Year/Tr
2 0 1 0 {3_ ® • ® • CD CD • CD CD SU
• @ @ @
® ® ® ® • FA © © © © ® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® 0 0 0 0 ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®
--Course College/ School -CD First College -@ Arts & Sciences -® Management -• Prof. Studies -® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -®Law Enf./Crim. Just. -------Not Applicable -Never ---
The Instructor:
Seldom.· Sometimes
Usually -.-'· _____ AI_w~ays ••. ·, . -,,. 1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... e 0 0 O 0 0 -:: -2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... O O 0 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and evaluati n criteria. . ............................. e O 0 6 0 0 -~ '· 4. Presented material in an organized majner. ...................................... e Q 0 Q 0 0 -·· 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... • 0 0 Q 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... • 0 0 6 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ •00000 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... • 0 0 O 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... e 0 0 0 0 0
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... e Q 0 Q 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ e Q 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .
and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... e 0 0 O 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... e Q 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work ................................ e()OOOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e 0 0 6 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . ................................ e 0 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. eQOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... eOOOOO
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor? e Excellent O Very Good OGood 0 Poor O Very Poor
20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount every Much OMuch OSome 0 Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? eves ONo
----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?
OVery e Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All
0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10
of the classroom space? -every Good -OGood -0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -
'·
![Page 28: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• Vv'W\v.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 29: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Metropolitan 0 Inst j c ional Improvement Questionnaire State University uc!i'ir.uti ---Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be
used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are an n
• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.
• Answer questions on both sides.
••®@® 1 CDCDCDeCD 2@@®®® 3@@@@@
4©©©©© s@®®®® 6@@®®® 7 (J) (J) (J) (J) (J)
s®® @e 9@®®®®
Fiscal Year/Tr
2 0 1 0 1-...1
~
® • ® • CD CD • CD CD SU
• ® ® ® @ @ @ @ ~ FA © © © © ® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® (J) (J) (J) (J)
® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®
--Course College/ School -CD First College -® Arts & Sciences -@ Management -• Prof. Studies -® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -
Not Applicable Never
S~ldoll\·
Sometimes
· .. usuanr:
-----------The Instructor: Always . -·-1. Stimulated studentthinking. . ................................................... e b 0 b 0 0
2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ..................................... O • 0 b 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eva uati n criteria. . ............................. O • 0 0 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner ....................................... 0900.00 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... O fl? 0 a 0 O 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... 0. 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ o•oooo 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... 0. 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... 0 tt 0 0 0 0
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... 0. 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ 0 • 0 Q 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .. •.. ·· ..
and sexual orientation ...................................................... o•oooo 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... 0 Q b 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work ................................ O 0000 15. Informed students of their progress in ti ~ t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 9 0 b 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement i~ le ming .................................. 0.0000 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. 090000 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... eOOOOO
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
O Excellent every Good OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor
20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount e Very Much OMuch OSome 0 Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? eves ONo
.. --·--c
-: -_,: -· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject? every O Somewhat O Not Very O Not at All
0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10
of the classroom space? OVery Good eGood 0 Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable
---
![Page 30: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
( V\:\it\ \A~ ·last-;'- J l.o'M F z.-\1 j S-+v~~ ~5·
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 31: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Metropol_itan 0 Inst le ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty [icmmu
Metropolitan State University would like in onn tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n
Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School
---------2 0 1 0 3 CD First College -• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -• Fill response ovals completely - do
not use ti's or Xs to mark choices. CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -
• @ @ @ e Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -
© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® (j) (j) (j) (j)
® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®
Not Applicable Never
l_ ··· .::.: Seldom J Sometimes · ·
The Instructor: 1 ~ .. ..:::_ . . lJS]lall:r:· .. 1 [ Always ·v I >
1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... GOO O O O 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ..................................... O 6 O d O O 3. Explained course requirements and eva uati n criteria. . ............................. e Q 0 O 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... 0 () O 0 O O 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... Op 0 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... • Q O q O O 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ OOOQOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning ............................. 800Q00 9. Kept discussion on track ..................................................... O•OOOO
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... O 0 0 O 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ O • 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .. 1
and sexual orientation ...................................................... 800000 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly ......................................... 800000 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . .............................. e O O Q O O 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • O O () O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le rning. . ................................ O Q O Q O O 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc ease understanding and application .............. 000000 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... •OOQOO
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
O Excellent OVery Good OGood 0 Poor 0 Very Poor
20. How much have you learned in this course? 8£xceptional Amount O Very Much 0 Much OSome 0 Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo
-------------: -----: ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject? OVery O Somewhat O Not Very 0 Not at All
0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 e4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10
of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -OGood -0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -
![Page 32: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
6 -=m-Vl olll<t0 ' , \\,~& , ~ \1-'.llU.\ \.{ ()\) ty ~.c1 .. Jt & I) 'S - '-I D\J CL~ 4 3
-t6t\'f.eJ ~ \J~> \.\\<l Cl\)\JC'-~S
• eng~ -tt \~b'-trkl ~
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
@~~\pl e\Jt \Da~1~ ~ ~·~n~U \~"JO'f-\L
' ~·,\If \V\e 001 ()\/\ '\ti Not do IA: ~t> "?If~ t t+ ~ wov-v- o.A b vtt _
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA • OMR Survey Systems • ww\v.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 33: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Metropol.it~ llJ Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State Umvers1ty [irrmuu
Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n
Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School
---------2 0 1 • Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
0 B CD First College -® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -
• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.
CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -
• @ @ @ e Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -
© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® <J) <J) <J) <J)
® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®
Not Applicable Never
cSelclofu Sometimes
The Instructor: · ·• Jlsua~y •• j Always ··
1. Stimulated student tr.inking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p O O O O 2. Explained course 09jectives and outco I es. . ...................................... O. O () O O 3. Explained course ref uirements and eva:luati n criteria. . ............................. O 4'> O O O O 4. Presented material ran organized maj1rnner. ...................................... •. Q .... 00 ... ·00 5. Made good use of community resource . . ........................................ 9 Q 0 0 0 0
I •· .•. ·.
6. Spoke clearly and apdibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ()0000 7. Encouraged questi9ns and treated the res ectfully. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q O O O O 8. Created a classroorr environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... e O O 0.... 0 O 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... O • 0 Q 0 O
10. Was prepared for sTssions with studen 1s. . ...................................... e () 0 Q 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ e 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respedtful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, .· .•
and sexual orientatibn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • C) 0 C) 0 O 13. Defi~ed assignmen~s clearly and carefu ly ....
1 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• o,,.-().0.~ .... ·-··.oo
14. Provided helpful wri~en responses on s ude ts work ................................ o. .J 00 15. Informed students ~f their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O ci O O 16. Facilitated students] active involvement in le ming. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00000 17. Designed assignm1nts and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. O. 0()00 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... eQOOOO
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
O Excellent eNeryGood OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor
20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount O Very Much •Much OSome O Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? IOiYes ONo
------------c -::
'· --r--·: -;·
i. -i:: -< ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week
did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?
QVery a somewhat O Not Very O Not at All
O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 O 16 or More O 7 to 10
of the classroom space? O Very Good •Good O Satisfactory O Unacceptable
---
![Page 34: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 35: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Metropolitan ~ State University '"' ·rr
Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire
Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n
Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School
---------• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
2 0 1 0 "J CD First College -® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -
• Fill response ovals completely - do not use tis or Xs to mark choices.
CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -
• Ci) Ci) Ci) • Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -
© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® ® (J) (J) (J)
® ® ® @ @ @
The Instructor:
® ® SP ® (J)
® @
Not Applicable Never
Seldi)m· Sometimes
.. Usuall)'. Always
1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... O Q • Q 0 O 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... O d • 6 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and evaluati n criteria ............................... OOeQOO 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. . ..................................... O 0 e b 0 0 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... 0 Q • Q 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... • Q 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ o•OQOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... 0 0 • Q 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... 0 0 • O 0 0
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... 0 d 9 b 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ 0 be Q 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, ..
and sexual orientation ...................................................... oeo6oo 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly ......................................... OQOOOO 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work ................................ OOeOOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 6 Oji O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . ................................ O 6 • Q 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. OQ•OOO 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
O Excellent OVery Good OGood ePoor 0 Very Poor
20. How much have you learned in this course? 0 Exceptional Amount 0 Very Much 0 Much OSome •Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo
------------·= -·~ -··· --·: -· -· -· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week
did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?
OVery O Somewhat -Not Very O Not at All
of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -
0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 •Good -0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -
9 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10
![Page 36: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
J11AL ~ .ft,, _J.q:) I V1~S A-hJ JiSc,t..Vnb"' [r...V'
ol(_ .
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions. Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 37: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Metropol~t~ a Inst UC ional Improvement Questionnaire State Umvers1ty [imrmu
Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n
• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
• Fill response ovals completely - do not use tis or Xs to mark choices.
• Answer questions on both sides.
6 di it Course ID
08t~ ••@@®
1 CDCDCD•CD 2 CDCDCDCDCD 3@@®®® 4@@©©© s®®®®® 6@@®®® 7 (j) (j) (j) (j) (j)
s@@•@• 9®®®®®
Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School
2 0 1 0 3 CD First College ® • ® • CD Arts & Sciences CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management
• CD CD CD e Prof. Studies ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. © © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. ® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® (j) (j) (j) (j)
® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®
J Not Applicable
J Never
J :_ Seldo1~ J Sometimes •.
--------------------------The Instructor: l -'- i ••··· i.lJsuilJ!;r 1.:;
l Always ··.·•···· -· 1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... e 0 0 0 0 0 -·: --2. Explained course objectives and outco ~es. . ...................................... O 4l 0 (j 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eva uati n criteria. . ............................. O • .... ·· .. ·. 0 0 ..•....•.. 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... e 0 0 Q 0 0
_., -5. Made good use of community resource1. . . . ..................................... e 0 0 0 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... e Q 0 0 0 0 -: 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ eOOQOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... • 0 0 Q 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track .................................................... OOeOOO
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... • 9 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ • 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, . · ... ·· I J •
and sexual orientation ...................................................... o•oooo 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... e 9 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s udeJts' work ................................ eOOQOO 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • b 0 0 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming .................................. ejOOOOO 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. •OOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... eOOOOO
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor? e Excellent OVeryGood OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor
20. How much have you learned in this course? 0 Exceptional Amount every Much 0 Much OSome 0 Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? 9Yes ONo
---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject? •Very O Somewhat 0 Not Very O Not at All
0 3 or Less 0 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10
of the classroom space? -every Good -OGood -0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -
..
![Page 38: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
l. ~Jctje.ol ttA-l- 1vt5t/victor~ fV\CJ~efrl ffY<:;;fecilVl!5 ,q~ or///o.e,c4 fcJ Jeot{ln~ wlth "5eV1£11-Nf fVPtfen11t!.
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR. Survey Systems• 1vwv.-.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 39: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Metropol_it~ Ill Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State Uruvers1ty !irmurn ---Metropolitan State University would like in onn tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be
used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are an n
• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.
• Answer questions on both sides.
The Instructor:
--Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -2 0 1 0 3 CD First College -® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -
• @ @ @ e Prof. Studies -® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP -® ® ® ® -(f) (f) (f) (f) -® ® ® ® -® ® ® ® --l Not Applicable ------
J Never l -cc ;_ Seidom
J Sometimes
J 2 IJ s:tially l Always 1' .··•·
1. Stimulated student thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . O e O O O O -·· ---2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O • O O O O 3. Explained course requirements and ev .luati n criteria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O 6 O O O O
-·· · .. 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e O O () O O 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · I• 6 0 0 0 0 -· 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O O O O O -· 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 000000 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 0 () 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e () 0 () 0 0
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Q 0 0 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, >i
and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e () 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 • 0 0 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o•oooo 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . _. O GOO O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O • O O O O 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application . 000000 18. Held class as scheduled. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <ilOOOOO
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
O Excellent every Good OGood OPoor O Very Poor
20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount •Very Much OMuch OSome O Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? GYes ONo
-· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?
OVery 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very O Not at All
O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 O 4 to 6 O 16 or More 0 7 to 10
of the classroom space? OVery Good •Good O Satisfactory 0 Unacceptable
---
![Page 40: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 41: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Metropolitan 0 ·Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State University [j[[rr'iuu
Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n
Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School
• Please use pencil or blue/black ink. • Fill response ovals completely - do
not use ti's or Xs to mark choices. • Answer questions on both sides.
The Instructor:
2 ® G)
• ® © ® ® CV ® ®
0 1
• ® G) • @ @
® ® © © ® ® ® ® CV CV ® ® ® ®
0 3 CD First College
• @ Arts & Sciences G) G) SU ® Management @ • Prof. Studies ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. ® ® SP ® CV ® ®
l Not Applicable
l Never
l Seldom :. _.::. .
_[ Sometimes
J ...:::::... :Us11ally r Always i'·-
1. Stimulated student thinking ..................................................... o•odOO 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... O C5 • O O O 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . ............................. 8 C5 O O O O 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... e O O O O O 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... O O e d O O 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... • 6 O O O O 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ ieOOQOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ tci learning ............................. eOOQOO 9. Kept discussion on track .................................................... o•OOOO
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... O • O 0 O O 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ e 0 0 0 0 O 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,
and sexual orientation ..................................................... -191QOOOO 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... O 8 0 O 0 O 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work ................................ o•oooo 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O e O O O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. , ................................ 000000 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. GOOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... •OOOOO
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
O Excellent every Good OGood 0 Poor O Very Poor
20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount e Very Much OMuch osome O Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo
----------------------------.: ---·-., --'-
-~ -·: ----------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?
OVery O Somewhat O Not Very O Not at All
O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 O 4 to 6 O 16 or More O 7 to 10
of the classroom space? OVery Good eGood O Satisfactory O Unacceptable
---
![Page 42: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 43: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Metropol_it~ D Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire State Umvers1ty !irmurn
Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an ny ous.
Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School
• Please use pencil or blue/black ink. • Fill response ovals completely - do
not use V's or Xs to mark choices.
• Answer questions on both sides.
2 ® CD
• ® © ® ® (j)
® ®
0 1
• ® CD • @ @
® ® © © ® ® ® ® (j) (j)
® ® ® ®
0 3 CD First College
• @ Arts & Sciences CD CD SU ®Management @ • Prof. Studies ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. ® ® SP ® (j)
® ®
J Not Applicable
J Never
L_ j_ Se!dorii J Sometimes ·. ·
The Instructor: L ~-'!- .1J~µa~)'.. .· ·
l Always •···•· . 1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... • O O () 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... • () O O O O 3. Explained course requirements and evailuati n criteria. . ............................. • () O 0 O O 4. Presented material in an organized marlmer. ...................................... • O O O O O 5. Made good use of community resource . . ........................................ • 0 0 () O O 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... O 6 0 Q 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res, ectfully ................................ •OOOOO 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning ............................. •()OQOO 9. Kept discussion on track .................................................... •OOOOO
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ...................................... • () O 0 O O 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ e () 0 () O O 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, 1 I'
and sexual orientation ...................................................... •QOOOO 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... • O 0 Q 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . .............................. cp O O O O O 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t · correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • O O t5 O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming .................................. eOOQOO 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. SOOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... eOOOOO
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
•Excellent O Very Good OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor
20. How much have you learned in this course? • Exceptional Amount O Very Much OMuch QSome O Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? eves QNo
---------------------------· '· -~ -( _,: ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week
did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?
every O Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All
O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 e 4 to 6 O 16 or More 07to10
of the classroom space? O Very Good eGood O Satisfactory O Unacceptable
---
![Page 44: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
\ " b lflt(P \Q \...... V I
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 45: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Metropolitan ~ State University ~ ................
Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire
Metropolitan State University would like in arm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n
Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School
---------• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
2 0 1 0 ~ CD First College -® • ® • v ® Arts & Sciences -
• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.
CD CD • CD CD SU @ Management -
• ® ® ® • Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. @ @ @ @ • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -
© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP ® ® ® ® (j) (j) (j) (j)
® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®
Not Applicable Never
The Instructor:
L_ ._. '.· Seldom
J Sometimes l •i f ~ ·.•·_L_ _::_ , U~uaUy ' ,1
[ Always ...... '
1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... @IQ O Q O O 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... e b Ob O O 3. Explained course requirements and evaluati n criteria. . ............................. $ Q O () O O 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... • O O Q O O 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... e Q 0 O 0 O 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... e Q O () O O 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully. . .............................. • O O Q O O 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... e O 0 Q 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • 0 0 0 0 0
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... • Q 0 Q 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ e 0 0 b 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, ··,· <
and sexual orientation ...................................................... •OOQOO 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly ......................................... eOOOOO 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . .............................. • O O O O O 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 6 O O O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming .................................. •OOOOO 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. eOOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... •OOOOO
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
•Excellent OVery Good OGood O Poor O Very Poor
20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount •Very Much OMuch osome O Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONO
-----------.. --· ---:· ---· _ ..
-· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject? •Very O Somewhat O Not Very 0 Not at All
O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 • 4 to 6 O 16 or More 0 7 to 10
of the classroom space? e Very Good OGood O Satisfactory O Unacceptable
---
![Page 46: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems • www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 47: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Metropolitan ~ State University ~' '~' ........ .&.J
Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire
Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri ulum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer questions on both sides. All responses are an n
Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School
---------• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
2 0 1 0 r2J CD First College -
• Fill response ovals completely - do not use ti's or Xs to mark choices.
® • ® • CD Arts & Sciences -CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -
• CD CD CD e Prof. Studies -• Answer questions on both sides. ® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -
© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP
• ® ® ® ® (j) (j) (j) (j)
® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®
J Not Applicable [ Never
The Instructor:
J J • 2 . S~me~!:()l}l l .. -'- ~ J_ '· Ust!~IIY,.
[ Always .. . .
1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... e 0 0 O 0 0 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ...................................... O • 0 CS 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and ev luati n criteria. . ............................. 0 d 0 d 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. ...................................... e b O O O O 5. Made good use of community resource . . ........................................ e O 0 O O O 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... e 0 O O O O 7. Encouraged questions and treated the pres ectfully ................................ •ooqoo 8. Created a classroom environment conduciv to learning. . ........................... e O O O 0 O 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... e 0 0 b O O
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ...................................... • .O 0 O 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ • 0 0 D 0 O 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities,
and sexual orientation ...................................................... •OOOOO 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... 0 0 0 • 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . .............................. e O O 6 O O 15. Informed students of their progress in ti e t correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e O O O O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming .................................. •OOOOO 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc eas understanding and application .............. •bOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... eOOQOO
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
eExcellent OVeryGood OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor
20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount every Much OMuch OSome O Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •Yes ONo
------------~ • .. -c -i .. -< -, -::
' -c ~: -·: ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week
did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?
OVery 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very O Not at All
O 3 or Less O 11 to 15 O 4 to 6 O 16 or More 0 7 to 10
of the classroom space? •Very Good OGood O Satisfactory O Unacceptable
---
![Page 48: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
She'<; very nood. o.r- 11'1a t<t'n(') th 9 no..c:;r t-imP Vqrv o.ct/Vf) "'nd Tl v -c- vi 1n vo111/ng
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
QufzeS" and f-E'~K- Cho\Jtd bf' p10-nh.Qcl ovt ~heCAd Of time (
~xp1afn O.':;~ 1 g nrn~nt-s- !Y)-af-'?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems • www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 49: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Metropolitan ~ Inst uc ional Improvement Questionnaire -State University _ ... ~-~ --Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be used in our continued efforts to improve the urri lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer
---questions on both sides. All responses are an n
• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.
• Answer questions on both sides.
The Instructor:
l111Dl11911J•I@@@
1 CD CD CD C11 CD 2@@®®® 3@@®®® 4©©©©© s®®®®® 6@@®®® 7 (j) (j) (j) (j) (j)
s@@•@• 9®®®®®
--Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School -2 0 1 0 '.J__ CD First College -® • ® • ® Arts & Sciences -CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -
• ® ® ® • Prof. Studies -® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -© © © © ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP -® ® ® ® -(j) (j) (j) (j) -® ® ® ® -® ® ® ® --Not Applicable -Never -· seldom -Sometimes --IJ:suany• -Always > .;:
~------'l
1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... O tp 0 O 0 0 --2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ..................................... O • 0 0 0 0 3. Explained course requirements and eva uati n criteria. . ............................. O Q ~ b 0 0 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. . ..................................... O • 0 6 0 0 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... ,. 9 j' - ---! 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... • (j 0 ____ '0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ •qopoo 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... • 0 0 0 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... ~ 0 0 0 0 0
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... Ci Q 0 O 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ • Q 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, · _-_.. _ .·
and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • Q 0 0 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly ......................................... OO•QOO 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00000 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O • 0 0 0 0 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . ................................ O • 0 0 0 0 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc ase understanding and application .............. •OOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... <800000
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
O Excellent 9l Very Good OGood OPoor 0 Very Poor
20. How much have you learned in this course? 0 Exceptional Amount •very Much 0 Much OSome 0 Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? eves ONo
·--_;_ -·~ -· -·' -< ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week
did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject? •Very 0 Somewhat 0 Not Very 0 Not at All
0 3 or Less • 11 to 15 0 4 to 6 0 16 or More 0 7 to 10
of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -OGood -• Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -
![Page 50: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
\J-e_, ~ t, e__cL-l\ 0e..- ~<l 7~ ~\-ls 0-e._
Y\t_ ~~A \4 \:_~<-0-.~ CZJ-\- ud-l ~
~ \~4-~\ \\ \ r Se_ nCS-e_ a~ \.\ l.-\_M~<
B. Do you have any suggestions for improving the course?
5 \~ .,h :\- ~~L-0 "- ·~\AS'.\- ~ '\~\ t ~ c_ ~ Ade-n.~~ -\- h_e_
~ 4 l-e. r I 4-\ _.___ --r \) ~ h \J\ C... \.-\. \{Y\. 4--\:"t...""' \ ~ \
Y (" t.-b ~ n ~G. ~ '0 0 ~ er <::;_ ~ h. .c;:i 1 l::_ ~ -e_ r Z ~ ~ q 11 V'-L.12__
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3
![Page 51: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Metropolitan "l I Inst Le ional Improvement Questionnaire State University · ---Metropolitan State University would like in orm tion and opinions about this course. Your responses will be
used in our continued efforts to improve the urric lum, and may be used in personnel decisions. Please answer ---questions on both sides. All responses are an n
• Please use pencil or blue/black ink.
• Fill response ovals completely - do not use V's or Xs to mark choices.
• Answer questions on both sides.
The Instructor:
---Fiscal Year/Tr Course College/ School
2 0 1 0 '.9 CD First College -® • ® • @ Arts & Sciences -CD CD • CD CD SU ® Management -
• @ @ @ e Prof. Studies -® ® ® ® • FA ® Nursing & Hlth. Sci. -® ® ® ® ® Law Enf./Crim. Just. -® ® ® ® ® SP -® ® ® ® -(j) (j) (j) (j) -® ® ® ® -® ® ® ® --l Not Applicable -Never -'-"- .··. seii:Iom ---J Sometimes
J ~ {Jsually I.: l Always ·..•.••. ····•·.·
1. Stimulated student thinking. . ................................................... O O O Q O O -·= -·O 2. Explained course objectives and outco es. . ..................................... O Q O 6 O O
. -·-3. Explained course requirements and eva uati n criteria. . ............................. Ob• d 0 0 --•. 4. Presented material in an organized ma ner. . ..................................... O Q • O 0 0 -< 5. Made good use of community resource . . . . ..................................... 0 Q 0 - 0 0 6. Spoke clearly and audibly. . .................................................... 0. 0 0 0 0 7. Encouraged questions and treated the res ectfully ................................ •¢0000 8. Created a classroom environment cond civ to learning. . ........................... 0 • 0 () 0 0 9. Kept discussion on track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... 0 9 0 0 0 0
10. Was prepared for sessions with studen s. . ....................................... e 0 0 O 0 0 11. Demonstrated mastery of subject matte . . ........................................ 0 e 0 0 0 0 12. Was fair and respectful with regard to a e, g nder, race, ethnicity, religion, disabilities, I' •
and sexual orientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................................... • O 0 O 0 0 13. Defined assignments clearly and carefu ly. . ....................................... 0 0 0 • 0 0 14. Provided helpful written responses on s ude ts' work. . .............................. O Q • O 0 O 15. Informed students of their progress in ti et correct deficiencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O O e O O 16. Facilitated students' active involvement in le ming. . ................................ O 0 O O 0 O 17. Designed assignments and tests to inc ease understanding and application .............. OeOOOO 18. Held class as scheduled ....................................................... (1)00000
19. How would you rate the overall performance of this instructor?
0 Excellent •Very Good OGood OPoor O Very Poor
20. How much have you learned in this course? O Exceptional Amount e Very Much OMuch OSome 0 Little
21. Did you receive a syllabus by the second meeting? •ves ONo
-: -: -·· ---------------------22. How important was class attendance 23 How many hours per week
did you typically spend preparing for class?
24. How would you rate the quality -for understanding the subject?
OVery 0 Somewhat •Not Very 0 Not at All
0 3 or Less e 11 to 15 0 4 to 6 0 16 or More O 7 to 10
of the classroom space? -OVeryGood -•Good -0 Satisfactory ~ -0 Unacceptable ~R -
![Page 52: kerrykleyman.weebly.com · ·uu Results: Course Level Fall 2009 College of Professional Studies # ltemText 1. Stimulated student thinking 2. Explained course objectives & outcomes](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022042002/5e6e4534144b511dad1d2c2c/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Please write comments in the boxes below.
A. What did you like about the course/instructor?
Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.
Please return this form to the person collecting them in this class.
Printed in USA• OMR Survey Systems• www.sur-sys.com FORM# MSU-06032-R3