validation by model assimilation/satellite intercomparison - esrin 9–13 december 2002 expected...

9
Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Expected Validation of Envisat Ozone Data E. Hilsenrath NASA Goddard Space Flight Center B. Bojkov G. Labow Science Systems and Applications

Upload: timothy-higgins

Post on 14-Jan-2016

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Expected Validation of Envisat Ozone Data E. Hilsenrath NASA Goddard

Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Expected Validation of

Envisat Ozone Data

Expected Validation of

Envisat Ozone Data

E. HilsenrathNASA Goddard Space Flight Center

B. BojkovG. LabowScience Systems and Applications

Page 2: Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Expected Validation of Envisat Ozone Data E. Hilsenrath NASA Goddard

Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

OutlineOutline

• Level 1 (radiance) validation– Satellite and ground

• Ozone Level 2 (column and profiles) validation– Satellite: SOLSE-2, SBUV/2, TOMS– Ground based: GSFC and Mauna Loa

• Results and Plans

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

Year

280

290

300

310

Ozon

e (D

obso

n Un

its)

Nimbus 7 TOMS

Meteor TOMS

Earth Probe TOMS

recovery predicted by model

Global average ozone measured by TOMS compared with Model

eruption of Mt. Pinatubo65N - 65S

version 8 TOMS data

Page 3: Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Expected Validation of Envisat Ozone Data E. Hilsenrath NASA Goddard

Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Level 1 (Radiance) Validation-1Level 1 (Radiance) Validation-1

• Radiative transfer calculations to compare radiances

• Compute radiance from satellite profiles correcting for lighting conditions– Successfully employed SBUV/2 for GOME

(Hilsenrath, et al., 1996)– Three operational SBUV/2s in orbit– Similar to R. van der A (2001) for GOME– Will include Ring effect– Most applicable to profile channels

• Results– Limited SCIAMACHY Level 1b data

available

Page 4: Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Expected Validation of Envisat Ozone Data E. Hilsenrath NASA Goddard

Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Level 1 (Radiance) Validation-2Level 1 (Radiance) Validation-2

• Ground based validation of “radiances”, 300-400 nm

– Radiative transfer models show direct comparisons can be made irrespective of ozone and aerosol columns

– TOMS, SBUV/2, GOME, SCIAMACHY can be validated independent of algorithm.

– System undergoing test at GSFC using SSBUV instrument

• Results– No Level 1b data available over GSFC

Page 5: Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Expected Validation of Envisat Ozone Data E. Hilsenrath NASA Goddard

Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Space Shuttle (SOLSE) comparisonSpace Shuttle (SOLSE) comparison

• SOLSE Space Shuttle payload

– Test limb scattering technique

– Entire limb imaged on detector

– SOLSE-1 in 1997 gave limited data but good results

– SOLSE algorithm employed by SCIAMACHY and OSIRIS

• Results (SOLSE-2)

– Mission delayed to Jan 2003

Page 6: Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Expected Validation of Envisat Ozone Data E. Hilsenrath NASA Goddard

Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Mauna Loa Intercomparison CampaignMauna Loa Intercomparison Campaign

• NDSC sponsored campaign :– Ozone sondes– Microwave sounder– Three lidars– August 5-21, 2002

• Results– No profiles from SCIAMACY– No profiles from MIPAS– Limited profiles from GOMOS (ACRI)

1011 1012

ozone number density (/cm3)

0

10

20

30

40

50

altit

ude

(km

)

August 11, 2002

JPL lidarGSFC lidarballoonmicrow ave

Page 7: Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Expected Validation of Envisat Ozone Data E. Hilsenrath NASA Goddard

Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

Total Ozone Column IntercomparisonTotal Ozone Column Intercomparison

• GSFC/Brewer comparisons– GSFC maintains highly calibrated

double Brewer for research and TOMS validation

– Aerosol and trace gas measurements

– Difference with TOMS is 3% rms

• Results– Very limited overpasses over GSFC

– Large biases observed

Scia. TOZ(+/-15 deg)

stddevScia. TOZ(+/-5 deg)

stddev Brewer TOZDiff

(S-B)2002 10 28 264.3 5.3 243.8 4.5 279.0 35.22002 10 28 234.7 10.7 - - 279.02002 11 04 220.5 2.3 220.4 2.2 291.2 70.82002 11 06 283.6 4.0 - - 283.42002 11 07 280.1 7.4 298.0 2.2 323.5 25.52002 11 16 306.2 7.5 - - 278.02002 11 17 309.1 23.7 276.3 9.5 262.3 -14.02002 11 22 287.9 15.6 - - 294.02002 11 23 280.4 3.2 282.5 4.1 297.6 15.1

Date

Page 8: Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Expected Validation of Envisat Ozone Data E. Hilsenrath NASA Goddard

Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

SBUV/2 – SCIAMACHY total ozone comparisonsSBUV/2 – SCIAMACHY total ozone comparisons

• Meteo Lv2, version 3.53

• << 12 hours

• SCIA scene inside SBUV/2

SBUV/2 (N16) – SCIA (UV Window)958 Matchups 10/25-31 2002

Page 9: Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Expected Validation of Envisat Ozone Data E. Hilsenrath NASA Goddard

Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002

SBUV/2 – SCIAMACHY total ozone comparisons SBUV/2 – SCIAMACHY total ozone comparisons