value & atittude

Upload: shantanu-datta

Post on 05-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    1/18

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    2/18

    Speakers-Md. Rakib Mahmud 2004334039

    Abdullah-al-Mamun 2004334040

    Jahid hasan 2004334041

    Mohammad saidur rahman 2004334043

    Sheikh khaleduzzaman shah 2004334044Md.Aminul islam 2004334045

    Saiful Alam 2004334046

    Md. Aminul islam 2004334047

    Anik Ranjan Das Titu 2004334048

    Ahsan habib 2004334049

    Alok Sorkar 2004334050

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    3/18

    Presentation on

    ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY (EOQ)

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    4/18

    Definition of EOQ

    EOQ Model

    Arbitrary Case Study

    Limitations of EOQ

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    5/18

    EOQ is the optimum amount of material to order thathas the least overall inventory related cost taking intoaccount, carrying cost, ordering cost, and Stock outcosts.

    These models deal with two general kinds of cost:

    Holding or carrying cost

    Ordering and setup cost

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    6/18

    The demand rate is uniform.

    The item cost does not varywith the order size.

    All the order is delivered at the same time.

    The lead time is well known enough that an order canbe timed to arrive when inventory is exhausted.

    The cost to place and receive an order is the sameregardless of the amount ordered.

    The cost of holding inventory is a linear function ofthe number of items held.

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    7/18

    Average inventory

    Q/2

    Annual carrying cost (Q/2)C

    Number of orders made per year-D/Q

    Annual ordering cost-(D/Q)STotal cost - TSC: (Q/2)C+ (D/Q)S

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    8/18

    Fig.: Relation between holding costs andordering costs

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    9/18

    The total annual carrying costs are increasing with thevalue of Q. where the total annual ordering costs aredecreasing as the value of Q increases. Thus the totalcosts are a minimum when the total carrying costs,and purchasing costs are equal, or:

    QC/2=DS/

    Re-organizing and making Q the subject:Q=EOQ=(2DS/C)

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    10/18

    Fig.: Basic inventory Economic order quantity model

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    11/18

    Fig.: costs trade-offs needed to determineEconomic order quantity

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    12/18

    Arbitrary Calculation:

    Case -1

    Parameters Demand (D) 936 units/year

    Order cost(S) $45

    Unit holding cost (H) $15

    Q=EOQ=(2DS/C)=

    =75

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    13/18

    The weekly demand for a certain item is given over a periodof 10weeks.

    1st week =20 units

    2nd

    week =30 units 3rd week = 25units

    4th week = 15 units

    5th week =28 units

    6th

    week =20 units 7th week =25 units

    8th week =18 units

    9th week = 22 units

    10th

    week =24 unitsThe ordering cost is $ 20per order and the carrying cost is 10

    paise per item per week. What is the ordering quantity andreorder level? The lead time is one week.

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    14/18

    Ordering quantity =

    The mean demand =

    =22.8 units = 23 unitsHence D= 23 units

    Q = =96 units

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    15/18

    Standard deviation= =4.66

    For 99% service level K=3

    Buffer stock = standard deviation of lead time safetyfactor

    =4.663=13.98, 14units.

    l d kl d d

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    16/18

    Average lead time consumption= mean weekly demand lead time

    = 231unit=23 units

    Hence reorder level =average lead time consumption+buffer stock

    = 23+14 units=37 units

    The order quantity =96 units

    The reorder level =37 units.

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    17/18

    Ordering to the nearest trade quantities or packing. Modifying an order quantity to get a better freight rate. The

    saving in freight may be more than compensate the extrainventory carrying cost.

    Simplification of routine.

    In the case of perishable or bulky items with diminishingconsumption or for items whose market prices are likely todecline, it may be better to order lass then theoretically workedout order quantities.

    Seasonal supply factors, market conditions, availability oftransport facilities etc.

    Liberal discounts or concessional freight rates may suggestslarger quantities.

  • 8/2/2019 Value & Atittude

    18/18

    Thanks

    ToAll