value & atittude
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
1/18
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
2/18
Speakers-Md. Rakib Mahmud 2004334039
Abdullah-al-Mamun 2004334040
Jahid hasan 2004334041
Mohammad saidur rahman 2004334043
Sheikh khaleduzzaman shah 2004334044Md.Aminul islam 2004334045
Saiful Alam 2004334046
Md. Aminul islam 2004334047
Anik Ranjan Das Titu 2004334048
Ahsan habib 2004334049
Alok Sorkar 2004334050
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
3/18
Presentation on
ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY (EOQ)
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
4/18
Definition of EOQ
EOQ Model
Arbitrary Case Study
Limitations of EOQ
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
5/18
EOQ is the optimum amount of material to order thathas the least overall inventory related cost taking intoaccount, carrying cost, ordering cost, and Stock outcosts.
These models deal with two general kinds of cost:
Holding or carrying cost
Ordering and setup cost
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
6/18
The demand rate is uniform.
The item cost does not varywith the order size.
All the order is delivered at the same time.
The lead time is well known enough that an order canbe timed to arrive when inventory is exhausted.
The cost to place and receive an order is the sameregardless of the amount ordered.
The cost of holding inventory is a linear function ofthe number of items held.
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
7/18
Average inventory
Q/2
Annual carrying cost (Q/2)C
Number of orders made per year-D/Q
Annual ordering cost-(D/Q)STotal cost - TSC: (Q/2)C+ (D/Q)S
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
8/18
Fig.: Relation between holding costs andordering costs
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
9/18
The total annual carrying costs are increasing with thevalue of Q. where the total annual ordering costs aredecreasing as the value of Q increases. Thus the totalcosts are a minimum when the total carrying costs,and purchasing costs are equal, or:
QC/2=DS/
Re-organizing and making Q the subject:Q=EOQ=(2DS/C)
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
10/18
Fig.: Basic inventory Economic order quantity model
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
11/18
Fig.: costs trade-offs needed to determineEconomic order quantity
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
12/18
Arbitrary Calculation:
Case -1
Parameters Demand (D) 936 units/year
Order cost(S) $45
Unit holding cost (H) $15
Q=EOQ=(2DS/C)=
=75
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
13/18
The weekly demand for a certain item is given over a periodof 10weeks.
1st week =20 units
2nd
week =30 units 3rd week = 25units
4th week = 15 units
5th week =28 units
6th
week =20 units 7th week =25 units
8th week =18 units
9th week = 22 units
10th
week =24 unitsThe ordering cost is $ 20per order and the carrying cost is 10
paise per item per week. What is the ordering quantity andreorder level? The lead time is one week.
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
14/18
Ordering quantity =
The mean demand =
=22.8 units = 23 unitsHence D= 23 units
Q = =96 units
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
15/18
Standard deviation= =4.66
For 99% service level K=3
Buffer stock = standard deviation of lead time safetyfactor
=4.663=13.98, 14units.
l d kl d d
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
16/18
Average lead time consumption= mean weekly demand lead time
= 231unit=23 units
Hence reorder level =average lead time consumption+buffer stock
= 23+14 units=37 units
The order quantity =96 units
The reorder level =37 units.
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
17/18
Ordering to the nearest trade quantities or packing. Modifying an order quantity to get a better freight rate. The
saving in freight may be more than compensate the extrainventory carrying cost.
Simplification of routine.
In the case of perishable or bulky items with diminishingconsumption or for items whose market prices are likely todecline, it may be better to order lass then theoretically workedout order quantities.
Seasonal supply factors, market conditions, availability oftransport facilities etc.
Liberal discounts or concessional freight rates may suggestslarger quantities.
-
8/2/2019 Value & Atittude
18/18
Thanks
ToAll