variability of tropical cyclone track density in the north atlantic

52
1 1 Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the 2 North Atlantic: Observations and high-resolution 3 simulations 4 5 Wei Mei 1* , Shang-Ping Xie 1 , Ming Zhao 2 6 7 1. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 8 2. NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey, and University Corporation for 9 Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ___________________________ 19 * Corresponding author address: Wei Mei, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of 20 California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive #0206, La Jolla, CA 92093-0206, USA. 21 E-mail: [email protected] 22

Upload: builien

Post on 09-Dec-2016

225 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  1

1  

Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the 2  

North Atlantic: Observations and high-resolution 3  

simulations 4  

5  

Wei Mei1*, Shang-Ping Xie1, Ming Zhao2 6  

7  

1. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 8  

2. NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey, and University Corporation for 9  

Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado 10  

11  

12  

13  

14  

15  

16  

17  

18  

___________________________ 19  

* Corresponding author address: Wei Mei, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of 20  

California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive #0206, La Jolla, CA 92093-0206, USA. 21  

E-mail: [email protected] 22  

Page 2: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  2

Abstract 23  

24  Interannual-decadal variability of tropical cyclone (TC) track density over the North 25  

Atlantic (NA) between 1979 and 2008 is studied using observations and simulations with 26  

a 25-km-resolution version of the High Resolution Atmospheric Model (HiRAM) forced 27  

by observed sea surface temperatures (SSTs). The variability on decadal and interannual 28  

timescales is examined separately. On both timescales, a basin-wide mode dominates 29  

with the time series related to the seasonal TC counts. On decadal timescales, this mode 30  

relates to SST contrasts between the tropical NA and the tropical Northeast Pacific as 31  

well as the tropical South Atlantic, whereas on interannual timescales it is controlled by 32  

SSTs over the central-eastern equatorial Pacific and those over the tropical NA. 33  

The temporal evolution of the spatial distribution of track density is further 34  

investigated by normalizing the track density with the seasonal TC counts. On decadal 35  

timescales, two modes emerge: One is an oscillation between the track density over the 36  

US East Coast and mid-latitude ocean and that over Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea; 37  

the other oscillates between low and middle latitudes. They might be driven respectively 38  

by the preceding winter North Atlantic Oscillation and concurrent Atlantic Meridional 39  

Mode. On interannual timescales, two similar modes are presented in observations but are 40  

not well separated in HiRAM simulations. 41  

Finally, the internal variability and predictability of the TC track density are explored 42  

and discussed using HiRAM ensemble simulations. The results suggest that the basin-43  

wide total TC counts/days are much more predictable than the local TC occurrence, 44  

posing a serious challenge to the prediction and projection of regional TC threats, 45  

especially the U.S. landfall hurricanes. 46  

Page 3: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  3

1. Introduction 47  

Tropical cyclones (TCs) are among the most devastating weather events on Earth 48  

with extremely important societal impacts (e.g., Pielke and Landsea 1998; Pielke et al. 49  

2008). In addition, these powerful storms potentially play important roles in the climate 50  

system by affecting heat transport (Emanuel 2001; Sriver and Huber 2007; Korty et al. 51  

2008; Mei et al. 2013). An adequate understanding of the TC variability and the 52  

underlying mechanisms helps to improve the accuracy of seasonal predictions and long-53  

term projections of TC activity, which in turn helps the community to be better prepared 54  

for the TC-imposed threats. Research in this field has received much attention owing to 55  

the strong rise of the TC activity in the North Atlantic (NA) starting in the mid-1990s 56  

(e.g., Goldenberg et al. 2001; Holland and Webster 2007; Klotzbach and Gray 2008). 57  

There are several measures of TC activity, including genesis, counts, intensity, tracks, 58  

and some other derivatives, such as the power dissipation index (PDI; Emanuel 2005a) 59  

and the accumulated cyclone energy (ACE; Bell et al. 2000). Our focus here is on 60  

interannual-decadal variability of the seasonal TC track density. The seasonal track 61  

density can be considered as a combination of the seasonal TC counts, the spatial 62  

distribution of TC genesis and of the subsequent tracks, but it has not received enough 63  

attention as its three contributors. 64  

Numerous studies have shown that in the NA, TC genesis and the associated seasonal 65  

TC counts, to a large extent, are controlled by their large-scale environment: Favorable 66  

conditions include above-normal rainfall over the Sahel region of West Africa, below-67  

normal sea level pressure (SLP), above-normal low-level vorticity and below-normal 68  

vertical wind shear over the subtropical NA (e.g., Ballenzweig 1959; McBride and Zehr 69  

Page 4: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  4

1981; Landsea and Gray 1992; Goldenberg and Shapiro 1996; Knaff 1997; Landsea et al. 70  

1999; DeMaria et al. 2001; Nolan and Rappin 2008; Fink et al. 2010; Daloz et al. 2012). 71  

In addition, smaller-scale thermodynamics and TC internal dynamics also play an 72  

important role in TC genesis (e.g., Simpson et al. 1997; Raymond and Sessions 2007; 73  

Wang 2012; Smith and Montgomery 2012; Komaromi 2013) and thus modulate the TC 74  

counts. On the other hand, TC tracks are primarily determined by environmental steering 75  

flows with a relatively smaller contribution from the interaction between TC dynamics 76  

and the steering flow (e.g., George and Gray 1976; Holland 1983). They are identified to 77  

exhibit strong intrabasin variabilities in the NA and much of them can be connected to 78  

various climate modes, such as El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and North Atlantic 79  

Oscillation (NAO) (Elsner et al. 2000; Elsner 2003; Kossin et al. 2010). 80  

The large-scale factors affecting TC genesis and tracks are not necessarily the same 81  

although TCs generated in different regions have, on average, different flavors for their 82  

paths (straight moving versus recurving; e.g., Wang et al. 2011; Colbert and Soden 2012). 83  

Accordingly, we expect to see a strong modulation of TC track density by large-scale 84  

ambient conditions and various modes of climate variability but not necessarily in a way 85  

the same as the modulation of TC genesis and/or TC tracks. This complicates an 86  

understanding of the variability in TC track density, which is more directly linked to 87  

societal and economic impacts of TCs (e.g., landfall). 88  

To our knowledge, Xie et al. (2005b) are among the first investigating the variability 89  

of NA TC track density. By means of principal component analysis, they depict three 90  

distinct modes of TC track density and connect each of them to different climate modes 91  

including ENSO, the dipole mode of Atlantic sea surface temperature (SST), NAO and 92  

Page 5: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  5

the Arctic Oscillation. More recently, although they do not directly address track density, 93  

Kossin et al. (2010) perform a thorough study of the NA TC tracks. Specifically, they 94  

separate the tracks into four groups, and study the respective variabilities in the frequency 95  

of different groups on various timescales and understand their connections to the 96  

Madden-Julian oscillation in addition to the climate modes examined in Xie et al. (2005b). 97  

The findings presented in these studies have advanced our knowledge of the climate 98  

controls of the preferred TC track pattern and provided valuable information regarding 99  

predicting/projecting the frequency of TCs striking the East Coast and the Gulf Coast of 100  

the United States. 101  

The analysis by Xie et al. (2005b) is, however, for a limited domain (i.e., 50°-86°W, 102  

20°-50°N) that excludes the Caribbean Sea and the main development region (MDR) of 103  

the NA TCs and most of the Gulf of Mexico, and it only focuses on TCs of hurricane 104  

intensity. On the other hand, the primary interest of Kossin et al. (2010) lies in TC tracks 105  

whose spatio-temporal variabilities may differ from the TC track density that more 106  

directly relates to the TC-induced damage to the human society. Here we extend the 107  

study area of Xie et al. (2005b) to the whole NA basin, and systematically explore the 108  

interannual-decadal variability of the NA TC track density and the associated climate 109  

modes. The results will also be compared with some of the findings in Kossin et al. 110  

(2010) that are based on an alternative method – cluster analysis. More importantly, our 111  

observational analysis is aided by an ensemble simulation of a global high resolution 112  

atmospheric model, which can well capture the observed variability in the NA seasonal 113  

TC counts when forced by observed SSTs. Comparisons between the observed and 114  

simulated variability would shed light on whether and the extent to which the variation of 115  

Page 6: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  6

TC track density may be explained by SST variability, with important implications for 116  

predictability. We also for the first time explore the internal variability in the NA TC 117  

track density using the high-resolution ensemble simulations, which has important 118  

implications regarding the predictability of local TC occurrence as well. 119  

After presenting the data and methods in use (section 2), we evaluate the general 120  

performance of the high-resolution model in reproducing the global TC climatologies 121  

(including seasonal TC counts and their variations from basin to basin), and temporal 122  

variability of seasonal TC counts as well as spatial distribution of TC track density over 123  

the NA (section 3). We then explore respectively the low- and high-frequency variability 124  

of NA TC track density and the corresponding underlying mechanisms in sections 4 and 125  

5. The internal variability and predictability of NA TC track density are examined and 126  

discussed in section 6. 127  

128  

2. Data and methods 129  

a. Observed TC tracks 130  

The observed TC tracks are from the National Hurricane Center best track dataset 131  

(McAdie et al. 2009), which provides the location and intensity of TCs in the North 132  

Atlantic at 6-h intervals. The observations are available since 1851, but to be consistent 133  

with the availability of the model output described below, only the observed track data 134  

between 1979-2008 are used. 135  

136  

b. Simulated TC tracks 137  

We use output from a 25-km-resolution version of the High-Resolution Atmospheric 138  

Page 7: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  7

Model (HiRAM) to study the variability of TC activity in response to observed SSTs. We 139  

note that Emanuel and Sobel (2013) recently suggest that climate model simulations 140  

forced only with observed SSTs may not produce correct surface fluxes and correct 141  

surface wind speeds, and may thereby influence TC-related thermodynamic parameters 142  

and eventually TC activity, particularly potential intensity. This effect on some TC 143  

metrics, such as TC number and TC tracks that we are interested in this study, however, 144  

may be not that important. Indeed, a 50-km-resolution version of HiRAM has been 145  

shown to well simulate the observed climatology and interannual variability of the 146  

hurricane numbers in various basins when forced by observed SSTs (Zhao et al. 2009). A 147  

detailed description of HiRAM can be found in Zhao et al. (2012). 148  

This study uses 6-hr fields including SLP, 850-hPa vorticity, temperature averaged 149  

between 300 and 500 hPa, and near-surface winds to detect and track the TCs following 150  

the methodology modified from Knutson et al. (2007) and Zhao et al. (2009). 151  

Specifically, we first identify potential storms based on the following criteria: 152  

(1) 850-hPa relative vorticity maxima exceeding 3.2×10!!  s!!are located within 153  

areas of 4.5°×4.5° latitude and longitude; 154  

(2) The local minimum of SLP, which must be within a distance of 2° latitude or 155  

longitude from the 850-hPa relative vorticity maximum, is defined as the center of 156  

the storm and should be at least 6 hPa lower than the environment. The local 157  

maximum surface (lowest model level) wind speed within an area of 2.6° latitude 158  

and longitude is detected to represent the intensity of the storm; 159  

Page 8: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  8

(3) The local maximum of 300-500 hPa averaged temperature is defined as the center 160  

of the warm core. Its distance from the storm center must be within 2° latitude or 161  

longitude, and its temperature must be at least 1°C warmer than the environment. 162  

After identifying all the potential storm snapshots, a trajectory analysis is then carried 163  

out to find the TC tracks. The qualified tracks must meet the following conditions: 164  

(1) The distance between two consecutive snapshots (with a time interval of 6 hr) 165  

must be shorter than 400 km. 166  

(2) The track must last longer than 4 days, and the maximum surface wind speed is 167  

greater than 17.5 m s-1 during the life cycle of the TC. 168  

Slight changes in the above-mentioned conditions do not significantly change the 169  

results presented below. 170  

The model solutions are sensitive to initial conditions owing to the chaotic and 171  

nonlinear nature of atmospheric processes (e.g., Harzallah and Sadourny 1995; Griffies 172  

and Bryan 1997). Accordingly, the simulated TC activity is also sensitive to initial 173  

conditions as confirmed by Zhao et al. (2009) who show that simulations initialized with 174  

slightly different conditions produce significant differences in the simulated interannual 175  

variation of basin-wide hurricane counts. To extract a reproducible signal associated with 176  

the external forcing (i.e., the observed SSTs), we use three-member ensemble simulations 177  

that are different only in initial conditions. The ensemble mean is considered as the 178  

forced response to the prescribed SSTs from observations. The deviation of each member 179  

from the ensemble mean represents internal variability of the model. To further advance 180  

our understanding of the internal variability, we also use the TC tracks detected from the 181  

output of the 50-km-resolution version HiRAM that is forced by repeating seasonally-182  

Page 9: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  9

varying climatological SSTs and fixed atmospheric radiative gases for 20 years. The 20 183  

years of data can be considered as 20 members that are different in initial conditions but 184  

subject to the same SST forcing (i.e., the observed monthly climatological SSTs). 185  

186  

c. Methods 187  

TC track density on a yearly basis for both observations and simulations are 188  

calculated as the duration of TC tracks within each 8°×8° grid within the study area of 189  

108°W-0° and Equator-50°N during the NA hurricane season (i.e., June 1-November 30). 190  

(We use this large grid to reduce the noise level; using a smaller grid, such as 5°×5° or 191  

6°×6°, gives similar results.) The leading modes of variability in TC track density are 192  

extracted using an empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis. Linear correlation and 193  

regression analyses are applied to identify the SST pattern(s) and atmospheric conditions 194  

responsible for each individual leading mode of the TC track density. The global mean 195  

SST (averaged between 65°S and 65°N) is removed before calculating the correlation and 196  

performing the regression analysis. Without this removal procedure similar results are 197  

obtained. 198  

199  

3. General performance of HiRAM 200  

Figure 1 shows the geographical distribution of TC genesis and tracks for 1979-2008 201  

from observations and one HiRAM simulation. Generally, HiRAM reproduces the spatial 202  

distribution of TC genesis, such as the high genesis density in both western and eastern 203  

North Pacific and relatively sparse genesis density over the NA. The simulated tracks 204  

also closely resemble those from observations; for example, the model can capture the 205  

Page 10: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  10

poleward extension of the observed tracks: larger poleward extension of the tracks in 206  

both the western North Pacific and the NA than in the eastern North Pacific. But there are 207  

notable discrepancies, including too few TCs in the model over the Gulf of Mexico and 208  

the South China Sea compared to the observations. 209  

The simulated climatological TC numbers in each individual basin (i.e., the NA, the 210  

eastern North Pacific, the western North Pacific, the North Indian Ocean, the South 211  

Indian Ocean and the western South Pacific) are quite close to the observed ones, with 212  

the western North Pacific having more TCs than any other basins while the North Indian 213  

Ocean experiences the smallest number of TCs (Fig. 2). 214  

The interannual variation in TC counts is also simulated with some degree of fidelity, 215  

particularly in the NA, consistent with Zhao et al. (2009). Figure 3 shows that the 216  

variability on both decadal and interannual timescales of the observed TC and hurricane 217  

counts is well captured in the model. The large deviation of the simulations from the 218  

observations during the first few years may be due to the inaccuracy in the observed 219  

SSTs before the availability of satellite measurements (Rayner et al. 2003). 220  

Figure 4 compares the observed and simulated spatial distribution of the 221  

climatological TC track density during the NA hurricane season. Generally, HiRAM 222  

captures the observed large-scale pattern and magnitude of the track density. For 223  

instance, both the simulated and observed track density is concentrated between 15°-224  

35°N with the highest density about 4 days per year. But large discrepancies exist over 225  

regions around 25°N: too sparse over the Gulf of Mexico while too dense over the open 226  

ocean. 227  

228  

Page 11: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  11

4. Low-frequency variability 229  

TC activity in the NA exhibits strong variability on both decadal and interannual 230  

timescales (e.g., Landsea et al. 1999; Vitart and Anderson 2001; Bell and Chelliah 2006). 231  

In this study, we separate out these timescales and explore the two components 232  

individually. We obtain the low-frequency component using a 7.5-yr-low-pass filter 233  

based on the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) technique. We tested the results using a 10-234  

yr-low-pass filter and obtained very similar results. In order to have a slightly larger 235  

degree of freedom for the low-frequency component (considering the 30-yr period of the 236  

simulations), we chose to use the 7.5-yr-low-pass filter. 237  

EOF analysis is applied to both the observed and modeled TC track density after the 238  

low-pass filtering. In both observations and model simulations, the low-frequency TC 239  

track density is dominated by a basin-wide mode (Figs. 5a,b; referred to as mode L1), 240  

indicating that on decadal timescales the TC track density varies simultaneously over the 241  

whole NA basin. The corresponding time series [i.e., the principal component (PC); Fig. 242  

5d] shows that during the first half of the study period the TC track density was 243  

suppressed while it was active during the later period. The transition occurred in the mid-244  

1990s, consistent with the findings that the NA TC activity has strengthened since that 245  

time. The phase is consistent with the Atlantic Multidedcadal Oscillation (AMO; e.g., 246  

Goldenberg et al. 2001). In both observations and simulations, the PC of the low-247  

frequency track density almost overlaps with the time series of the corresponding 248  

normalized low-frequency TC counts (Fig. 5d). 249  

The loading over the Gulf of Mexico is significantly underestimated in the model 250  

simulations (cf. Figs. 5a,b), consistent with the underestimated climatology of the TC 251  

Page 12: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  12

track density discussed before (Fig. 4). To remedy this, we scale the modeled TC track 252  

density at each grid by its corresponding observed climatology so that the simulations 253  

have the same climatology as the observations. Then the scaled field is subject to EOF 254  

analysis after removing the high-frequency variability. The spatial pattern of the 255  

dominant mode is shown in Fig. 5c. It is clear that after the scaling, the pattern and 256  

magnitude get closer to the observations, while the PC of the simulated TC track density 257  

remains largely unchanged. 258  

The reader may question the validity of the results since the data in use are only 30-yr 259  

long and may not be long enough to study the decadal variability and the loadings may be 260  

dominated by the trend over this short study period. Indeed, the linear trend of the TC 261  

track density shows a spatial pattern similar to that of mode L1 shown above (Fig. S1 in 262  

the supplemental material), and the loading of mode 1 of the low-frequency track density 263  

with the linear trend removed prior to the EOF analysis is significantly reduced over most 264  

of the NA (except over the Gulf of Mexico; Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). But 265  

when we repeated the EOF analysis using the observed TC best-track data between 1950-266  

2009 (i.e., a doubled length), the obtained modes are insensitive to whether the linear 267  

trend is removed or not (Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). Also, the obtained spatial 268  

pattern is nearly identical to that of mode L1 shown above in Fig. 5a, and its PC almost 269  

overlaps with the PC of mode L1 between 1979 and 2008. All these suggest that (1) the 270  

main results presented in this study are not sensitive to the length of the data, and (2) the 271  

trend during the period of 1979-2008 is actually a part of the interdecadal variability over 272  

a longer time period. And owing to the latter point, in this study we do not differentiate 273  

Page 13: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  13

the trend over the study period (i.e., 1979-2008) from the interdecadal/low-frequency 274  

variability. 275  

A close inspection of Fig. 5d reveals that the PCs of the simulations lag the PC of the 276  

observations by 2-3 yr. To understand this interesting point, we repeated the EOF 277  

analysis using the low-pass-filtered SLP fields from the NCEP-DOE Reanalysis 2 278  

(Kanamitsu et al. 2002)1 and the HiRAM simulations. The lead-lag relation also exists in 279  

the PCs of the SLP (not shown). This provides a clue that the lag may be due to the fact 280  

that in observations, the atmosphere modulates TC activity and the ocean simultaneously, 281  

while in the model the state of the SSTs, reflecting the state of the atmosphere in previous 282  

years, induces a response in the atmosphere that in turn affects the TC activity. This 283  

speculation merits further exploration, and may be tested in a coupled model and an 284  

atmospheric-only run forced by the SST that is produced by the coupled model [i.e., 285  

following the procedure of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP)]. 286  

To understand what patterns of SST force this mode of low-frequency TC track 287  

density, we regress the low-pass-filtered SSTA onto the obtained PCs shown in Fig. 5d. 288  

In both observations and simulations (Fig. 6), a combination of two SST patterns 289  

emerges. The first is a zonal gradient in SSTs between the tropical NA and the tropical 290  

Northeast Pacific, and the second pattern is a (relatively weak) meridional gradient in 291  

SSTs between the tropical NA and the tropical South Atlantic. It is worth noting that for 292  

the first pattern, the cold SSTA in the tropical Northeast Pacific may be a result of the 293  

tropical NA warming through a Rossby wave response (e.g., Zhang and Delworth 2005; 294  

Sutton and Hodson 2007). We also plot in Fig. 5d the time series of the normalized 295  

                                                                                                               1 Using NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis 1 data produces nearly identical results for this and all following analyses.

Page 14: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  14

anomaly of the low-pass-filtered absolute and relative SST in the tropical NA. Both 296  

exhibit very similar temporal evolution as the TC-related variables, indicating the key 297  

role of AMO in shaping the NA TC counts and basin-integrated track density on decadal 298  

timescales (e.g., Goldenberg et al. 2001). The underlying atmospheric mechanisms 299  

relevant to these two SST patterns will be investigated later. 300  

Previous studies have shown that there are oscillations of TC activity between 301  

different parts of the NA basin (e.g., Kimberlain and Elsner 1998; Elsner 2003; Kossin et 302  

al. 2010), which are different from the basin-wide mode discussed above. In order to 303  

remove this basin-wide mode that is tightly linked to the seasonal TC counts and to 304  

extract the patterns associated with the oscillations suggested in previous studies, we 305  

normalize the TC track density by the seasonal total TC counts, and then subject the 306  

normalized track density after low-pass filtering to EOF analysis. 307  

Figure 7 shows the first leading mode of the normalized track density (referred to as 308  

mode LN1). Despite some discrepancies, both the observations and simulations show an 309  

oscillation of the proportion of the track density between two areas: one is the US East 310  

Coast and midlatitude open ocean, and the other includes the Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean 311  

Sea and, to a lesser extent, the MDR. The corresponding PCs are shown in Fig. 7c. The 312  

proportion of TC activity over the East Coast and the mid-latitude open ocean increased 313  

during the first decade, peaked in early 1990s, and then decreased. The changes in the 314  

time series resemble the NAO index during the preceding winter season (red curve in Fig. 315  

7c). This is consistent with Elsner et al. (2000) and Elsner (2003) that the TC activity in 316  

the Gulf of Mexico, to some degree, is opposite to that in the East Coast, and such an 317  

oscillation is modulated by the NAO. The minimum in the relative proportion of the Gulf 318  

Page 15: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  15

of Mexico TC activity during the early 1990s is also evident in the second panel of Fig. 5 319  

in Kossin et al. (2010). Because the NAO index is not based on SSTs while the model is 320  

forced by SSTs only, the combination of analyses of observations and simulations shown 321  

here further demonstrates the possible mechanism that the NAO phenomenon in the 322  

previous winter season forces the ocean and the resultant SSTAs then affect the 323  

atmosphere and TC activity during the hurricane season. 324  

To understand the mechanisms responsible for mode LN1, we regress the low-pass-325  

filtered SSTAs, SLP, 850-hPa vorticity, vertical wind shear, 500-hPa vertical velocity 326  

onto the PCs shown in Fig. 7c. The SST pattern (Fig. 8a) is similar to the first SST 327  

pattern discussed before (Fig. 6), i.e., opposite anomalies over the tropical NA and the 328  

tropical Northeast Pacific. When the tropical NA is anomalously cold and the tropical 329  

Northeast Pacific is anomalously warm, the TC track density over the East Coast and the 330  

open ocean makes an above-normal contribution to the basin-integrated total track 331  

density (i.e., total TC days) than that over the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea. This is 332  

concurrent with anomalously high SLP over the subtropical NA (Fig. 8b). The anomalous 333  

atmospheric circulation induces below-normal vorticity over regions extending from the 334  

Gulf of Mexico southeastward through the MDR and above-normal vorticity between 335  

30°-40°N (Fig. 8c). The vertical wind shear exhibits a similar pattern with a slightly 336  

southward shift (Fig. 8c). Changes in other variables, such as mid-troposphere vertical 337  

velocity, show consistent changes (Fig. 8b). As suggested by Emanuel (2007) and 338  

Vimont and Kossin (2007), various climate conditions act in a consistent way to affect 339  

the NA TC activity. 340  

Page 16: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  16

The second leading mode (i.e., mode LN2) of the normalized TC track density in 341  

observations and the third leading mode (i.e., mode LN3) in simulations are characterized 342  

by an oscillation between lower latitudes (including the Caribbean Sea and MDR) and 343  

subtropics (including the Gulf of Mexico and East Coast) (Fig. 9). Note that the smaller 344  

amplitude over the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea in simulations than observations is 345  

due to the sparser climatological TC track density in simulations than observations over 346  

these regions (Fig. 4). The temporal evolution of this mode exhibits a below-normal 347  

condition and above-normal condition occurring respectively before and after early 348  

1990s. And the proportion of the TC track density over the lower latitudes has increased 349  

since mid-1980s. This is in accord with a recent study by Kossin et al. (2010) who 350  

identify that a regime shift occurs around mid-1980s toward a greater proportion of 351  

lower-latitude TC activity. Figure 5 of Kossin et al. (2010) also suggests that there is a 352  

systematic shift toward proportionally more eastern NA storm tracks and proportionally 353  

less Gulf of Mexico storm tracks. This feature is captured by our analysis as well (Figs. 354  

9a,b), and the PCs in Fig. 9c exhibit a similar evolution as the low-pass-filtered time 355  

series of clusters 2 and 3 in Fig. 5 of Kossin et al. (2010). 356  

Regression of SSTA onto the time series after low-pass filtering (Fig. 10a) shows a 357  

contrast between the SST in the NA and that in the South Atlantic, which resembles the 358  

Atlantic Meridional Mode (e.g., Xie et al. 2005a; Vimont and Kossin 2007; Kossin and 359  

Vimont 2007; Smirnov and Vimont 2011). Analyses of 850-hPa relative vorticity and 360  

vertical wind shear show consistent results with increased vorticity and reduced wind 361  

shear over the lower-latitude region and reduced vorticity and increased wind shear over 362  

the higher-latitude region (Fig. 10b), though the signal is generally much weaker than 363  

Page 17: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  17

that for mode LN1; regression of 500-hPa vertical velocity also shows consistent results 364  

(not shown). These are consistent with the recent findings by Merlis et al. (2013) based 365  

on aquaplanet simulations, and suggest that by controlling the position and strength of the 366  

NA Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), the meridional SST gradient between the 367  

NA and the South Atlantic induces changes in the atmospheric circulation and the 368  

associated low-level vorticity and vertical wind shear, and thereby modulates the TC 369  

activity over the NA. 370  

371  

5. High-frequency variability 372  

It has been known for several decades that climate modes on interannual timescales 373  

(e.g., ENSO) exert a strong control on the NA TC activity (e.g., Gray 1984; Klotzbach 374  

2011). This section examines the interannual variability of TC track density and the 375  

associated dominant SST patterns. EOF analysis is applied to high-pass-filtered TC track 376  

density using a cutoff period of 7.5 yr. Figure 11 shows the spatial pattern of the first 377  

leading mode (referred to as mode H1) and the corresponding PCs. Similar to the low-378  

frequency track density, the leading mode of the high-frequency track density is a basin-379  

wide mode in both observations and HiRAM simulations. Correcting the biases in the 380  

climatological distribution makes the simulated pattern more closely resemble the 381  

observations, particularly over the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea. The PCs for the 382  

observations and simulations are very similar with a linear correlation coefficient of 383  

around 0.78. 384  

Regression of the high-frequency SSTAs onto the PCs (Fig. 12a) suggests SSTAs 385  

both in the tropical Pacific associated with ENSO and in the tropical NA force the basin-386  

Page 18: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  18

wide TC activity on interannual timescales. Then it is curious to know whether the 387  

SSTAs in these two regions act independently so that the regressed pattern reflects an 388  

optimal SST pattern, or they simply correlates with each other and only one of them 389  

affects the TC activity. To answer this, we calculate the correlation between Nino3.4 390  

index (defined as the SSTA averaged over the region between 170°-120°W and 5°S-391  

5°N) and the global SSTAs. As shown in Fig. 12b, the SSTs in the central and eastern 392  

equatorial Pacific have no significant correlation with the simultaneous SSTs over the 393  

tropical NA during the NA hurricane season (i.e., June-November). This suggests that 394  

both ENSO and the SSTAs over the tropical NA contribute to modulating the NA TC 395  

track density, and the SSTA pattern shown in Fig. 12a reflects an optimal SST pattern for 396  

an active TC season: TC activity is maximized when the SST over the central and eastern 397  

equatorial Pacific is below normal and the SST over the tropical NA is above normal. 398  

These findings are broadly consistent with previous studies (e.g., Shapiro and Goldenberg 399  

1998; Sabbatelli and Mann 2007) though their focus is on TC counts. 400  

Next we attempt to separate the ENSO effect from that of local SSTAs over the 401  

tropical NA, and we first explore the remote effect of ENSO by regressing the high-402  

frequency TC track density onto the Nino3.4 index multiplied by -1. (Using the negative 403  

values of Nino3.4 index is to facilitate the comparison with the effect of the tropical NA 404  

SST warming shown later.) In observations (Fig. 13a), La Nina with anomalously cold 405  

SSTs over the central and eastern equatorial Pacific favors above-normal TC track 406  

density almost everywhere in the NA basin, an effect most prominent over the lower 407  

latitudes and the Gulf of Mexico. The variability explained by ENSO is around 5-35%. 408  

HiRAM can generally simulate the effect by ENSO, but the simulated effect is relatively 409  

Page 19: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  19

strong over the open ocean adjacent to the East Coast and relatively weak over the Gulf 410  

of Mexico and Caribbean Sea (Fig. 13c). Correcting the biases in the climatological TC 411  

track density, to some extent, improves the results (Fig. 13e). 412  

Analyses of the environmental variables suggest that the effect of ENSO on the TC 413  

track density is achieved by affecting the large-scale environmental factors, such as the 414  

SLP and vertical wind shear (Fig. 14a), particularly over the low-latitude area, as has 415  

been extensively discussed in previous studies (e.g., Gray 1984). 416  

We then perform the EOF analysis after removing the ENSO-induced effect from the 417  

original high-frequency TC track density. The leading mode (referred to as mode H1*) 418  

again shows a basin wide change in both observations and HiRAM simulations (Figs. 419  

13b,d,f). But compared to the ENSO effect, its amplitude is large over the higher-latitude 420  

region, particularly over the open ocean. Correlation of the corresponding PC with global 421  

SSTs suggests that this pattern is associated with the SST over the tropical NA (Figs. 12c 422  

and 13g), supporting the hypothesis that the SSTs in the central and eastern equatorial 423  

Pacific and the tropical NA force the NA TC track density independently2. When the SST 424  

over the MDR is warmer than normal, the SLP is below normal over the whole NA basin, 425  

the low-level vorticity is above normal, and the wind shear is weakened south of 20°N, 426  

producing a more favorable environment for TC genesis and development (Fig. 14b). 427  

Thus it is clear that during a La Nina event and/or when the tropical NA SST is 428  

warmer than normal, the whole NA basin experiences above-normal TC track density, 429  

though each effect has a strong spatial dependence (see also Kossin et al. 2010). This is 430  

                                                                                                               2  It  is  worth  noting  that  an  El  Nino  (La  Nina)  event  may  induce  warm  (cold)  SSTAs  over  the  tropical  NA  during  the  winter  and  spring  seasons,  whose  persistence  may  contribute  to  the  state  of  tropical  NA  SSTAs  during  the  hurricane  season.    

Page 20: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  20

similar to the effect of the tropical NA SST on the TC track density on longer timescales, 431  

as discussed in the previous section. Similar to the analysis for the low-frequency 432  

variability, we normalize the high-frequency component of the TC track density by the 433  

seasonal total counts and then repeat the EOF analysis. Again, the observations (Figs. 434  

15a,b) show two different oscillating modes (referred to as modes HN1 and HN2): one is 435  

southwest versus northeast, and the other is lower latitudes versus higher latitudes; they 436  

are similar to those for the low-frequency component (Figs. 7 and 9). In HiRAM 437  

simulations (Fig. 15c), these two modes appear to be combined, as indicated by the 438  

marginally significant correlation between the PC of mode HN1 in simulations and the 439  

PC of mode HN1 in observations (r=0.362) and that between the PC of mode HN1 in 440  

simulations and the PC of mode HN2 in observations (r=0.345) (Fig. 15d). The 441  

differences in the observed and simulated spatial patterns are associated with the biases in 442  

simulating the climatology of the TC track density (Fig. 4). 443  

Correlations of the PCs with global SSTs suggest that the first pattern (i.e., southwest 444  

versus northeast) is associated with ENSO while the second (i.e., lower latitudes versus 445  

higher latitudes) is linked to the local SSTs (not shown). 446  

447  

6. Internal variability 448  

As mentioned in section 2, we can partition the TC track density at each grid in each 449  

simulation (𝑋) into two components: an ensemble mean approximating the forced 450  

response3 𝑋! (this is what all the above analyses are based), and the departures from that 451  

                                                                                                               3 A more strictly defined forced response can be obtained using the methodology described in Venzke et al. (1999) when the ensemble size is large enough (e.g., above

Page 21: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  21

mean (𝑋!). To measure the importance of internal variability, we use the following metric 452  

– the signal-to-noise ratio: 453  

𝑅 = !!!!

, (1) 454  

where 𝜎! is the standard deviation of the ensemble mean component 𝑋!, and 𝜎!, 455  

representing the internal variability, is the standard deviation of the departures from the 456  

mean in all three ensemble members. A large value of 𝑅 indicates that the internal 457  

variability is not as important as the forced response, and hence less uncertainty. 458  

Figure 16a shows the spatial distribution of the signal-to-noise ratio defined in Eq. 459  

(1). Large values can be found over the MDR and the open ocean adjacent to the 460  

continents/islands, suggesting the forced response in the TC track density over the MDR 461  

(which is closely related to the TC genesis) is relatively stronger than over other regions. 462  

However, even the largest value is only around 1.1, indicating the strong internal 463  

variability for the TC track density over the whole NA basin. In contrast, the ratio is 464  

around 1.6 for both the NA TC counts and basin-integrated total TC days. This suggests 465  

the predictability of the basin-wide total TC counts/days are much higher than that of 466  

local TC occurrence, posing a serious challenge to the prediction and projection of 467  

regional TC threats, though the prediction of the seasonal total NA TC counts has 468  

significantly improved over the recent years (e.g., Smith et al. 2010). 469  

We further examine the internal variability of TC track density from a 20-year 470  

experiment using the 50-km-resolution version HiRAM forced by repeating 471  

climatological SSTs. Figure 16b shows the ratio of the mean value of the track density to 472  

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         10). However, because we only have three simulations, we simply define the forced response as the ensemble mean of the three simulations.

Page 22: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  22

its standard deviation. [Note the definition of this ratio is different from the one defined 473  

in Eq. (1), making them quantitatively uncomparable]. Again a small ratio denotes strong 474  

internal variability and correspondingly low predictability. The pattern of this ratio is 475  

consistent with the pattern of the signal-to-noise ratio shown in Fig. 16a: relatively 476  

weaker internal variability and thus higher predictability over the MDR and the open 477  

ocean adjacent to the continents/islands. Interestingly, the corresponding ratio of the 478  

mean of the total TC counts/days to their respective standard deviation is around 4, which 479  

suggests again that the basin-integrated metric has a much higher predictability. 480  

481  

7. Summary and conclusions 482  

This study has examined the interannual-decadal variability of TC track density over 483  

the North Atlantic between 1979 and 2008 using TC best-track data from the National 484  

Hurricane Center and TC tracks detected from an ensemble of three simulations 485  

performed using a 25-km-resolution version of HiRAM. Forced by observed SSTs, 486  

HiRAM reproduces the observed temporal variations of seasonal counts of both TCs and 487  

hurricanes in the NA; it also generally captures the observed geographic distribution of 488  

the NA climatological TC track density, although there are some systematic biases 489  

including underestimated density over the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea. 490  

We partitioned the TC track density into interannual and decadal components. EOF 491  

analyses show that on both timescales the variability of the TC track density is dominated 492  

by a basin-wide mode despite of some differences in the detailed spatial structure, and the 493  

basin-wide mode is strongly connected to the variations of the seasonal TC counts on 494  

both timescales. 495  

Page 23: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  23

Correlations of the principal component of the basin-wide mode with global SSTs 496  

reveal that the decadal mode of NA TC track density is modulated by two SST dipole 497  

patterns: between the tropical NA and the tropical eastern North Pacific, and between the 498  

tropical NA and the tropical South Atlantic. On interannual timescales, the SSTAs over 499  

the central-eastern equatorial Pacific associated with ENSO and over the tropical NA 500  

affect the NA TC activity: a La Nina state and anomalously warm tropical NA SSTs 501  

favor above-normal TC track density. These two factors may not always act at the same 502  

time but can induce extreme TC activity when they work simultaneously. They affect TC 503  

activity by influencing the environmental conditions in the atmosphere (e.g., low-level 504  

vorticity and vertical wind shear). The ENSO effect is more prominent over lower 505  

latitudes and the Gulf of Mexico while the NA SSTs’ effect spreads over the whole NA. 506  

To minimize the dominance of the seasonal TC counts on the basin-wide variability 507  

of TC track density and to examine the spatial variations, we normalized the seasonal 508  

track density at each grid point with the seasonal TC counts, and then repeated the EOF 509  

analysis. On decadal timescales, two spatial patterns emerge. One represents opposite 510  

variations in the contribution to the basin-integrated TC density between the following 511  

two regions: the East Coast and mid-latitude open ocean, and Gulf of Mexico and 512  

Caribbean Sea and, to a lesser extent, the MDR. This mode appears to be controlled by 513  

the NAO condition during the preceding winter season with a positive NAO phase 514  

favoring higher proportion of TC track density over the East Coast and the mid-latitude 515  

open ocean. This effect comes into play via the following mechanisms. Frist, the 516  

anomalous atmospheric circulation associated with a positive NAO phase during the 517  

winter and spring season generates anomalously cold SSTs over both the mid-to-high-518  

Page 24: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  24

latitude and low-latitude NA. The negative SSTAs in the low latitudes then induce 519  

changes in the atmospheric circulations across the Central America, which in turn 520  

produces anomalously warm SSTAs over the tropical Northeast Pacific. These SSTAs 521  

further strengthen the anomalous atmospheric circulations and affect both the position 522  

and strength of the subtropical high during the hurricane season, and generate below-523  

normal TCs over the Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean Sea and the MDR, leading to a reduced 524  

proportion of TC track density over these regions. 525  

The second mode is an oscillation of the proportion of TC track density between low- 526  

and mid-latitudes in the meridional direction. This mode explains that the proportion of 527  

the TC track density over the lower latitudes has increased since mid-1980s, as reported 528  

by Kossin et al. (2010). This mode can be linked to the meridional contrast of the SSTs 529  

between the tropical NA and the tropical South Atlantic, i.e., the so-called Atlantic 530  

Meridional Mode. Analyses of atmospheric variables including low-level vorticity, mid-531  

level vertical velocity and vertical wind shear reveal that its effect on TC activity is 532  

achieved through a modulation of the position and strength of the NA ITCZ. 533  

Two similar spatial patterns also exist for the normalized track density on interannual 534  

timescales, particularly in observations. In HiRAM simulations, these two modes are not 535  

well separated. These two modes are related to ENSO and the local tropical NA SSTs, as 536  

suggested by the correlation map of global SSTs. 537  

Our analyses have shown that HiRAM well captures the observed variability of TC 538  

activity in various aspects on both timescales when subject to the observed SST forcing, 539  

with important implications for predictability. When provided with an accurate 540  

prediction/projection in the pattern and magnitude of the SSTAs, the high-resolution 541  

Page 25: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  25

HiRAM is able to provide useful information for not only the strength of the basin-wide 542  

TC activity but also the large-scale spatial distribution of the track density (i.e., relative 543  

proportion of regional track density). But further improvements are needed, particular for 544  

the simulation over the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea as HiRAM significantly 545  

underestimates TC activity over these areas. Also, we note that HiRAM underestimates 546  

the two extremely active seasons during the study period, i.e., 1995 and 2005 (Fig. 3). A 547  

rough look at the controlling modes on decadal and interannual timescales (Figs. 5 and 548  

13) indicates that the model may not be able to sufficiently capture the extreme TC 549  

occurrence that is related to the tropical NA SST warming. A more detailed attribution 550  

study will shed light on this. 551  

The internal variability of the NA TC track density has also been explored based on 552  

the HiRAM ensemble simulations. Calculations of the signal-to-noise ratio, defined as 553  

the ratio of the standard deviation of the ensemble mean to that of the deviations of the 554  

three ensemble members from the ensemble mean, show that the internal variability is 555  

relatively small in the MDR and along Caribbean islands, but generally comparable to the 556  

SST-forced variability. The signal-to-noise ratio is much higher for the total NA TC 557  

counts and basin-integrated TC days than for local track density (1.6 vs. 1.1). This 558  

suggests that the seasonal total TC counts are more predictable than the local TC 559  

occurrence. Thus, on a seasonal basis, TC landfall, say on the Gulf Coast and East Coast, 560  

appears stochastic and its accurate prediction is difficult (e.g., Hall and Jewson 2007). 561  

This should be differentiated from the operational forecast of the path for a specific TC at 562  

lead time of a few days, which has improved steadily in recent decades (e.g., Cangialosi 563  

and Franklin 2013). These findings also have important implications in the context of 564  

Page 26: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  26

climate change: Even if the multi-model ensemble can well project the changes in total 565  

seasonal TC counts under global warming, it remains difficult to assess local changes in 566  

the TC occurrence, particularly near the coast where landfall TCs incur greatest societal 567  

and economic impacts. 568  

569  

Acknowledgements 570  

This work was funded by NSF and NOAA. We thank Prof. Kerry Emanuel for sharing 571  

the compiled tropical cyclone best track data, and we thank the editor and the anonymous 572  

reviewers for their comments that helped improve the manuscript. 573  

574  

575  

576  

577  

578  

579  

580  

581  

582  

583  

584  

585  

586  

Page 27: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  27

References 587  

Ballenzweig, E. M., 1959: Relation of long-period circulation anomalies to tropical storm 588  

formation and motion. J. Meteor., 16, 121-139. 589  

Bell, G. D., and M. Chelliah, 2006: Leading tropical modes associated with interannual 590  

and multidecadal fluctuations in North Atlantic hurricane activity. J. Climate, 19, 591  

590-612. 592  

Bell, G. D., M. S. Halpert, R. C. Schnell, R. W. Higgins, J. Lawrimore, V. E. Kousky, R. 593  

Tinker, W. Thiaw, M. Chelliah, and A. Artusa, 2000: Climate assessment for 1999. 594  

Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81, S1-S50. 595  

Cangialosi, J. P., and J. L. Franklin, 2013: 2012 National Hurricane Center forcast 596  

verification report. Technical report, Natl. Hurricane Cent., Miami, Fla. [Available 597  

at http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/pdfs/ Verification_2012.pdf.]. 598  

Colbert, A. J., and B. J. Soden, 2012: Climatological variations in North Atlantic tropical 599  

cyclone tracks. J. Climate, 25, 657-673. 600  

Daloz, A. S., F. Chauvin, K. Walsh, S. Lavender, D. Abbs, and F. Roux, 2012: The 601  

ability of general circulation models to simulate tropical cyclones and their 602  

precursors over the North Atlantic main development region. Clim. Dyn., 39, 1559-603  

1576. 604  

DeMaria, M., J. A. Knaff, and B. H. Connell, 2001: A tropical cyclone genesis parameter 605  

for the tropical Atlantic. Wea. Forecasting, 16, 219-233. 606  

Elsner, J. B., 2003: Tracking hurricanes. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84, 353-356. 607  

Elsner, J. B., K.-B. Liu, and B. Kocher, 2000: Spatial variations in major U.S. hurricane 608  

activity: Statistics and a physical mechanism. J. Climate, 13, 2293-2305. 609  

Page 28: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  28

Emanuel, K., 2001: Contribution of tropical cyclones to meridional heat transport by the 610  

oceans. J. Geophys. Res., 106(D14), 14771-14781. 611  

Emanuel, K., 2005a: Increaseing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 612  

years. Nature, 436, 686-688. 613  

Emanuel, K., 2005b: Genesis and maintenance of Mediterranean hurricanes. Adv. Geosc., 614  

2, 217-220. 615  

Emanuel, K., 2007: Environmental factors affecting tropical cyclone power dissipation. J. 616  

Climate, 20, 5497-5509. 617  

Emanuel, K., and A. Sobel, 2013: Response of tropical sea surface temperature, 618  

precipitation, and tropical cyclone-related variables to changes in global and local 619  

forcing. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 5, doi:10.1002/jame.20032. 620  

Fink, A. H., J. M. Schrage, and S. Kotthaus, 2010: On the potential causes of the 621  

nonstationary correlations between West African precipitation and Atlantic 622  

hurricane activity. J. Climate, 23, 5437-5456. 623  

George, J. E., and W. M. Gray, 1976: Tropical cyclone motion and surrounding 624  

parameter relationships. J. Appl. Meteorol., 15, 1252-1264. 625  

Goldenberg, S. B., C. W. Landsea, A. M. Mestas-Nunez, and W. M. Gray, 2001: The 626  

recent increase in Atlantic Hurricane Activity: Causes and implications. Science, 627  

293, 474-479. 628  

Goldenberg, S. B., and L. J. Shapiro, 1996: Physical mechanisms for the association of El 629  

Nino and West African rainfall with Atlantic major hurricane activity. J. Climate, 9, 630  

1169-1187. 631  

Gray, W. M., 1984: Atlantic seasonal hurricane frequency. Part I: El Nino and 30 mb 632  

Quasi-Biennial Oscillation influences. Mon. Wea. Rev., 112, 1649-1668. 633  

Page 29: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  29

Griffies, S. M., and K. Bryan, 1997: A predictability study of simulated North Atlantic 634  

multidecadal variability. Climate Dyn., 13, 459-487. 635  

Hall, T. M., and S. Jewson, 2007: Statistical modelling of North Atlantic tropical cyclone 636  

tracks. Tellus, 59A, 486-498. 637  

Harzallah, A., and R. Sadourny, 1995: Internal versus SST-forced atmospheric variability 638  

as simulated by an atmospheric general circulation model. J. Climate, 8, 474-495. 639  

Holland, G. J., 1983: Tropical cyclone motion: Environmental interaction plus a beta 640  

effect. J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 328-342. 641  

Holland, G. J., and P. J. Webster, 2007: Heightened tropical cyclone activity in the North 642  

Atlantic: natural variability or climate trend? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 365, 2695-643  

2716. 644  

Kanamitsu,  M.,  W.  Ebisuzaki,  J.  Woollen,  S.-­‐K.  Yang,  J.  J.  Hnilo,  M.  Fiorino,  and  G.  L.  645  

Potter,  2002:  NCEP-­‐DOE  AMIP-­‐II  Reanalysis  (R2).  Bull.  Amer.  Meteor.  Soc.,  83,  646  

1631-­‐1643.  647  

Kimberlain, T. B., and J. B. Elsner, 1998: The 1995 and 1996 North Atlantic hurricane 648  

seasons: A return of the tropical-only hurricane. J. Climate, 11, 2062-2069. 649  

Klotzbach, P. J., 2011: El Nino-Southern Oscillation's impact on Atlantic basin 650  

hurricanes and U.S. landfalls. J. Climate, 24, 1252-1263. 651  

Klotzbach, P. J., and W. M. Gray, 2008: Multidecadal variability in North Atlantic 652  

tropical cyclone activity. J. Climate, 21, 3929-3935. 653  

Knaff, J. A., 1997: Implications of summertime sea level pressure anomalies in the 654  

tropical Atlantic region. J. Climate, 10, 789-804. 655  

Page 30: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  30

Knutson, T. R., J. J. Sirutis, S. T. Garner, I. M. Held, and R. E. Tuleya, 2007: Simulation 656  

of the recent multidecadal increase of Atlantic hurricane activity using an 18-km-657  

grid regional model. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88, 1549-1565. 658  

Komaromi, W. A., 2013: An investigation of composite dropsonde profiles for 659  

developing and nondeveloping tropical waves during the 2010 PREDICT field 660  

campaign. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 542-558. 661  

Korty, R. L., K. A. Emanuel, and J. R. Scott, 2008: Tropical cyclone-induced upper-662  

ocean mixing and climate: Application to equable climates. J. Climate, 21, 638-654. 663  

Kossin, J. P., S. J. Camargo, and M. Sitkowski, 2010: Climate modulation of North 664  

Atlantic hurricane tracks. J. Climate, 23, 3057-3076. 665  

Kossin, J. P., and D. J. Vimont, 2007: A more general framework for understanding 666  

Atlantic hurricane variability and trends. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88, 1767-1781. 667  

Landsea, C. W., and W. M. Gray, 1992: The strong association between western Sahelian 668  

monsson rainfall and intense Atlantic hurricanes. J. Climate, 5, 435-453. 669  

Landsea, C. W., R. A. Pielke Jr., A. M. Mestas-Nunez, and J. A. Knaff, 1999: Atlantic 670  

basin hurricanes: indices of climate changes. Climate Change, 42, 89-129. 671  

McAdie, C. J., C. W. Landsea, C. J. Neumann, J. E. David, E. Blake, and G. R. Hammer, 672  

2009: Tropical Cyclones of the North Atlantic Ocean, 1851-2006. Historical 673  

Climatology Series, Vol. 6-2, NOAA, 238 pp. 674  

McBride, J. L., and R. Zehr, 1981: Observational analysis of tropical cyclone formation. 675  

Part II: Comparison of non-developing versus developing systems. J. Atmos. Sci., 676  

38, 1132-1151. 677  

Page 31: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  31

Mei, W., F. Primeau, J. C. McWilliams, and C. Pasquero, 2013: Sea surface height 678  

evidence for long-term warming effects of tropical cyclones on the ocean. Proc. 679  

Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, in press. 680  

Merlis, T. M., M. Zhao, and I. M. Held, 2013: The sensitivity of hurricane frequency to 681  

ITCZ changes and radiatively forced warming in aquaplanet simulations. Geophys. 682  

Res. Lett., 40, 4109-4114, doi:10.1002/grl.50680. 683  

Nolan, D. S., and E. D. Rappin, 2008: Increased sensitivity of tropical cyclogenesis to 684  

wind shear in higher SST environments. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L14805, 685  

doi:10.1029/2008GL034147. 686  

Pielke Jr., R. A., J. Gratz, C. W. Landsea, D. Collins, M. A. Saunders, and R. Musulin, 687  

2008: Normalized hurricane damage in the United States: 1900-2005. Natural 688  

Hazards Review, 9, 29-42. 689  

Pielke Jr., R. A., and C. W. Landsea, 1998: Normalized hurricane damages in the United 690  

States: 1925-95. Wea. Forecasting, 13, 621-631. 691  

Raymond, D. J., and S. L. Sessions, 2007: Evolution of convection during tropical 692  

cyclogenesis. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L06811, doi:1029/2006GL028607. 693  

Rayner, N. A., D. E. Parker, E. B. Horton, C. K. Folland, L. V. Alexander, D. P. Rowell, 694  

E. C. Kent, and A. Kaplan, 2003: Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea 695  

ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J. Geophys. 696  

Res., 108(D14), 4407, doi:10.1029/2002JD002670. 697  

Sabbatelli, T. A., and M. E. Mann, 2007: The influence of climate state variables on 698  

Atlantic tropical cyclone occurrence rates. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D17114, 699  

doi:10.1029/2007JD008385. 700  

Page 32: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  32

Shapiro, L., and S. B. Goldenberg, 1998: Atlantic sea surface temperature and tropical 701  

cyclone formation. J. Climate, 11, 578-590. 702  

Simpson, J., E. Ritchie, G. J. Holland, J. Halverson, and S. Stewart, 1997: Mesoscale 703  

interactions in tropical cyclone genesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 2643-2661. 704  

Smirnov, D., and D. J. Vimont, 2011: Variability of the Atlantic Meridional Mode during 705  

the Atlantic hurricane season. J. Climate, 24, 1409-1424. 706  

Smith, D. M., R. Eade, N. J. Dunstone, D. Fereday, J. M. Murphy, H. Pohlmann, and A. 707  

A. Scaife, 2010: Skilful multi-year predictions of Atlantic hurricane frequency. 708  

Nature Geoscience, 3, 846-849. 709  

Smith, R. K., and M. T. Montgomery, 2012: Observations of the convective environment 710  

in developing and non-developing tropical disturbances. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 711  

138, 1721-1739. 712  

Sriver, R. L., and M. Huber, 2007: Observational evidence for an ocean heat pump 713  

induced by tropical cyclones. Nature, 447, 577-580. 714  

Sutton, R. T., and D. L. R. Hodson, 2007: Climate response to basin-scale warming and 715  

cooling of the North Alantic Ocean. J. Climate, 20, 891-907. 716  

Venzke, S., M. R. Allen, R. T. Sutton, and D. P. Powell, 1999: The atmospheric response 717  

over the North Atlantic to decadal changes in sea surface temperature. J. Climate, 718  

12, 2562-2584. 719  

Vimont, D. J., and J. P. Kossin, 2007: The Atlantic Meridional Mode and hurricane 720  

activity. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L07709, doi: 10.1029/2007GL029683. 721  

Page 33: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  33

Vitart, F., and J. L. Anderson, 2001: Sensitivity of Atlantic tropical storm frequency to 722  

ENSO and interdecadal variability of SSTs in an ensemble of AGCM integrations. 723  

J. Climate, 14, 533-545. 724  

Wang, Z., 2012: Thermodynamic aspects of tropical cyclone formation. J. Atmos. Sci., 725  

69, 2433-2451. 726  

Wang, C., H. Liu, S.-K. Lee, and R. Atlas, 2011: Impact of the Atlantic warm pool on 727  

United States landfalling hurricanes. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L19702, 728  

doi:10.1029/2011GL049265. 729  

Xie, L., T. Yan, and L. Pietrafesa, 2005a: The effect of Atlantic sea surface temperature 730  

dipole mode on hurricanes: Implications for the 2004 Atlantic hurricane season. 731  

Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L03701, doi:10.1029/2004GL021702. 732  

Xie, L., T. Yan, L. J. Pietrafesa, J. M. Morrison, and T. Karl, 2005b: Climatology and 733  

interannual variability of North Atlantic hurricane tracks. J. Climate, 18, 5370-734  

5381. 735  

Zhang, R., and T. L. Delworth, 2005: Simulated tropical response to a subtantial 736  

weakening of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation. J. Climate, 18, 1853-1860. 737  

Zhao, M., I. M. Held, S.-J. Lin, and G. A. Vecchi, 2009: Simulations of global hurricane 738  

climatology, interannual variability, and response to global warming using a 50-km 739  

resolution GCM. J. Climate, 22, 6653-6678. 740  

Zhao, M., I. M. Held, and S.-J. Lin, 2012: Some counter-intuitive dependencies of 741  

tropical cyclone frequency on parameters in a GCM. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 2272-2283. 742  

743  

744  

Page 34: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  38

830  

Figure 1: Global TC genesis (black dots) and tracks (green curves) between 1979-2008 831  

from (a) observations and (b) one realization using the 25-km-resolution version of 832  

HiRAM. Note that several TCs over the South Atlantic and medicanes over the 833  

Mediterranean Sea (e.g., Emanuel 2005b) are not shown. 834  

835  

836  

837  

838  

839  

840  

841  

842  

843  

844  

845  

0 60E 120E 180 120W 60W 0 60S

40S

20S

EQ

20N

40N

60N

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) Observations

0 60E 120E 180 120W 60W 0 60S

40S

20S

EQ

20N

40N

60N

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(b) HiRAM run 1

Page 35: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  39

846  

Figure 2: A comparison of the observed (blue bars) and simulated (black bars) 847  

climatological TC numbers (averaged between 1979-2008) in different basins. NA: North 848  

Atlantic; EP: eastern North Pacific; WP: western North Pacific; NI: North Indian Ocean; 849  

SI: South Indian Ocean; SP: western South Pacific. Thin cyan vertical lines indicate the 850  

standard deviation of TC numbers during the study period. 851  

852  

853  

854  

855  

856  

857  

858  

859  

860  

861  

862  

NA EP WP NI SI SP0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

observationsHiRAM runs

Basins

Annu

ally

ave

rage

d TC

num

ber

Page 36: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  40

863  

Figure 3: A comparison of the observed (red curve) and simulated (black curve) 864  

anomalies in the number of (a) TCs and (b) hurricanes in the NA between 1979-2008. 865  

The gray shading shows the spread of the model results, represented by the standard 866  

deviation of the results from the three ensemble members. 867  

868  

869  

870  

871  

872  

873  

874  

875  

876  

877  

878  

879  

880  

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005−8

−4

0

4

8

12

Year

Anom

alou

s an

nual

num

ber

(b) Hurricanes

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005−10

−5

0

5

10

15

20observationsHiRAM runs

Year

Anom

alou

s an

nual

num

ber

(a) All TCs

Page 37: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  41

881  

Figure 4: (a) Observed and (b) simulated geographical distribution of the climatological 882  

TC track density (unit: days per year) during the NA hurricane season calculated at each 883  

8°×8° grid. 884  

885  

886  

887  

888  

889  

890  

891  

892  

893  

894  

895  

896  

897  

898  

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) Observations

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(b) HiRAM

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Page 38: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  42

899  

Figure 5: (a) Spatial pattern of the first leading mode of the low-pass-filtered observed 900  

TC track density (denoted as mode L1; unit: days per year) in the NA during the 901  

hurricane season. (b) Same as in (a), but for the simulated track density. (c) Same as in 902  

(b), but for the simulated track density normalized by the ratio of the observed 903  

climatology to the simulated climatology. (d) The corresponding normalized time series 904  

together with the normalized anomalies in the total NA TC numbers from both the 905  

observations and simulations as well as normalized anomalies in the area-mean absolute 906  

SST over the tropical NA and its value relative to the global tropical mean SST. 907  

908  

909  

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) Obs. mode L1 (49.7%)

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(b) HiRAM mode L1 (65.4%)

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(c) HiRAM(scaled) mode L1 (69.6%)

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

−2

−1

0

1

2Obs. PC1Hiram PC1Hiram(scaled) PC1Obs. TC numberHiram TC number

Trop. NA SSTATrop. NA rel. SSTA

(d) PCs

Year

Page 39: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  43

910  

Figure 6: Regression of the low-pass-filtered SSTA (unit: °C) onto the PC of mode L1 911  

shown in Fig. 5 for (a) observations and (b) HiRAM simulations. Areas with a linear 912  

correlation coefficient of greater than 0.5 are stippled. 913  

914  

915  

916  

917  

918  

919  

920  

921  

922  

923  

924  

925  

926  

927  

0 60E 120E 180 120W 60W 0 60S

40S

20S

EQ

20N

40N

60N

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) r(sst, PC−L1) Obs.

−0.3

−0.2

−0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0 60E 120E 180 120W 60W 0 60S

40S

20S

EQ

20N

40N

60N

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(b) r(sst, PC−L1) HiRAM

−0.3

−0.2

−0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

Page 40: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  44

928  

Figure 7: (a) Spatial pattern of the first leading mode of the observed low-pass-filtered 929  

TC track density (denoted as mode LN1; unit: days per year) after being normalized 930  

using the total NA TC counts during the hurricane season. (b) Same as in (a), but for the 931  

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) Obs. mode LN1 (33.9%)

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−0.8

−0.6

−0.4

−0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(b) HiRAM mode LN1 (43.6%)

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−0.8

−0.6

−0.4

−0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) Obs. mode LN1 (33.9%)

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−0.8

−0.6

−0.4

−0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

−2

−1

0

1

2

Year

(c) PCs

Obs. PC1Hiram PC1JFM NAOAMJ NAO

Page 41: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  45

simulated track density. (c) The corresponding normalized PCs for observations (blue) 932  

and simulations (black) together with the normalized low-pass-filtered NAO index 933  

averaged between January and March (red) and between April and June (magenta). The 934  

NAO index is from 935  

http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/pna/nao_index.html. 936  

937  

938  

939  

940  

941  

942  

943  

944  

945  

946  

947  

948  

949  

950  

Page 42: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  46

951  

Figure 8: Regression of (a) SSTA (unit: °C), (b) SLP (contours; unit: hPa) and 500-hPa 952  

omega (shading; unit: Pa s-1), and (c) vertical wind shear (contours; unit: m s-1) and 850-953  

hPa vorticity (shading; unit: s-1) onto the PC of mode LN1 shown in Fig. 7. Contour 954  

interval is 0.1 hPa in (b) and 0.2 m s-1 in (c). Areas with correlation coefficient greater 955  

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(b) r(slp & t500, PC−LN1) HiRAM

0.7.6.50.4

−0.3−0.2

−0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.4

0

0

160W 120W 80W 40W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−0.01

−0.005

0

0.005

0.01

0 60E 120E 180 120W 60W 0 60S

40S

20S

EQ

20N

40N

60N

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) r(sst, PC−LN1) HiRAM

−0.3

−0.2

−0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(c) r(full shear & vort850, PC−LN1) HiRAM

−228642

−1

−1

−0.8

8

−0.6

6

0 4

−0.4

−0.4

−0.4

0 4

4−0.2

−0.2 −0.2

−0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.4

0.40.6

0.6

0.8

0.81

1

1

1.21.41.61.82

−44

00

0

0

0

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1x 10−6

Page 43: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  47

than 0.5 are stippled, and a median spatial filtering has been applied twice to the vorticity 956  

field in (c). 957  

958  

959  

960  

961  

962  

963  

964  

965  

966  

967  

968  

969  

970  

971  

972  

973  

974  

Page 44: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  48

975  

Figure 9: Same as in Fig. 7, but for the second leading mode of the normalized TC track 976  

density in observations and the third leading mode in simulations (denoted respectively as 977  

mode LN2 and mode LN3). 978  

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) Obs. mode LN1 (33.9%)

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−0.8

−0.6

−0.4

−0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) Obs. mode LN2 (21.1%)

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−0.8

−0.6

−0.4

−0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(b) HiRAM mode LN3 (15.1%)

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−0.8

−0.6

−0.4

−0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

−2

−1

0

1

2

Year

(c) PCs

Obs. PC2Hiram PC3

Page 45: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  49

979  

Figure 10: Regression of (a) SSTA (unit: °C) and (b) vertical wind shear (contours; unit: 980  

m s-1) and 850-hPa vorticity (shading; unit: s-1) onto the PC of mode LN3 from 981  

simulations shown in Fig. 9. In (b), contour interval is 0.2 m s-1, areas with correlation 982  

coefficient greater than 0.5 are stippled, and a median spatial filtering has been applied 983  

twice to the vorticity field. 984  

985  

986  

987  

988  

989  

990  

991  

992  

993  

994  

995  

0 60E 120E 180 120W 60W 0 60S

40S

20S

EQ

20N

40N

60N

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) r(sst, PC−LN3) HiRAM

−0.3

−0.2

−0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(b) r(full shear & vort850, PC−LN3) HiRAM

−2−1

−0.4

−0.2−0.2

0−0.2

0 2

0.2

0.2 0.2−4

0

0

0 0

0

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1x 10−6

Page 46: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  50

996  

Figure 11: Same as in Fig. 5, but for the first leading mode of the high-pass-filtered TC 997  

track density (denoted as mode H1). 998  

999  

1000  

1001  

1002  

1003  

1004  

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) Obs. mode H1

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(b) HiRAM mode H1

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(c) HiRAM(scaled) mode H1

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

−3

−2

−1

0

1

2

3

Year

(d) PCs

Obs. PC1Hiram PC1Hiram(scaled) PC1Obs. TC numberHiram TC number

Page 47: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  51

1005  

Figure 12: (a) Spatial pattern of correlation between the PC of mode H1 shown in Fig. 11 1006  

and the SST averaged over the NA hurricane season (i.e., June-November). (b) 1007  

Regression of global SST (unit: °C) onto Nino3.4 index during the NA hurricane season. 1008  

(c) Same as in (a), but for the correlation between the PC of mode H1* shown in Fig. 13 1009  

and the SST. Areas with correlation significant above a 95% confidence level are shown 1010  

in (a) and (c), and are stippled in (b). 1011  

1012  

1013  

1014  

1015  

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) r(sst, PC−H1) HiRAM

0 60E 120E 180 120W 60W 0 60S

40S

20S

EQ

20N

40N

60N

−0.8

−0.6

−0.4

−0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

0 60E 120E 180 120W 60W 0 60S

40S

20S

EQ

20N

40N

60N

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(b) r(sst, nino34)

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(c) r(sst, PC−H1*) HiRAM

0 60E 120E 180 120W 60W 0 60S

40S

20S

EQ

20N

40N

60N

−0.8

−0.6

−0.4

−0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

Page 48: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  52

1016  

Longitude (degree)

Latitude (degree)

(b) Obs. Mode H1*

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

20

30

3030 404050

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) ENSO effect (Obs.)

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

30

30

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) ENSO effect (Obs.)

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

30

30

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) ENSO effect (Obs.)

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

30

30

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Longitude (degree)La

titud

e (d

egre

e)

(a) ENSO effect (Obs.)

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

30

30

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) ENSO effect (Obs.)

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

30

30

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) ENSO effect (Obs.)

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

30

30

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) ENSO effect (Obs.)

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

30

30

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) ENSO effect (Obs.)

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

20

20

30

30

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(b) Obs. Mode H1*

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

20

30

3030 404050

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(c) ENSO effect (HiRAM)

10

10

10

10

1010

10

20

2020

20

20

303040

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(d) HiRAM Mode H1*

10

10

1010 10

10

10

102020

20

30

30

3030

30

40

40

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(e) ENSO effect (HiRAM; scaled)

10

10

1010

10

10

20

2020

20

20

303040

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(f) HiRAM(scaled) Mode H1*

1010

10

10

10

10

20

20

20

30

30

30

30

3040

40

50

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005−3

−2

−1

0

1

2

3

Year

(g) PCs

Obs. PC1Hiram PC1Hiram(scaled) PC1MDR SSTA

Page 49: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  53

Figure 13: (a)(c)(e) Regression onto the Nino3.4 index multiplied by -1 of the high-pass-1017  

filtered TC track density (shading; unit: days per year) from observations (a), simulations 1018  

(c), and simulations after normalizing the simulated climatology of TC track density by 1019  

the observations (e). (Thus they show a condition induced by a La Nina event.) 1020  

(b)(d)(f)(g) Same as in Fig. 11, but for the first leading mode of the high-pass-filtered TC 1021  

track density after removing the contribution of ENSO (denoted as mode H1*). The high-1022  

pass-filtered SSTA averaged over the MDR is also plotted in (g). White contours in (a)-1023  

(f) show the fraction of explained variance (unit: %). 1024  

1025  

1026  

1027  

1028  

1029  

1030  

1031  

1032  

1033  

1034  

1035  

1036  

1037  

1038  

1039  

Page 50: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  54

1040  

Figure 14: Regression of the simulated high-pass-filtered vertical wind shear (shading; 1041  

unit: m s-1) and SLP (contours; unit: hPa) onto (a) the Nino3.4 index multiplied by -1 and 1042  

(b) the PC of mode H1* in simulations. Contour interval is 0.1 hPa. 1043  

1044  

1045  

1046  

1047  

1048  

1049  

1050  

1051  

1052  

1053  

1054  

1055  

1056  

1057  

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) r(full shear & slp, nino34) HiRAM

−0.3

−0.2

−0.2

−0.2 −0.2

−0.2

−0.1

−0.1

−0.1 −0.1

−0.1−0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.40.5

0.50.6

0.70.8

0

0

0

0

0

0

00

−2

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(b) r(full shear & slp, PC−H1*) HiRAM

−0.3

−0.3−0.3

−0.2

−0.2

−0.2

−0.2

−0.1

−0.1

−0.1−0.1

−0.1

−0.10.1

0

0

0

0

0

−2

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

Page 51: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  55

1058  

Figure 15: (a) Spatial pattern of the first leading mode of the observed high-pass-filtered 1059  

TC track density (denoted as mode HN1; unit: days per year) after being normalized 1060  

using the total NA TC counts during the hurricane season. (b) Same as in (a), but for the 1061  

second leading mode (denoted as mode HN2). (c) Same as in (a), but for the simulated 1062  

TC track density. (d) Corresponding normalized PCs of mode HN1 in observations 1063  

(blue), mode HN2 in observations (red), and mode HN1 in simulations (black). 1064  

1065  

1066  

1067  

1068  

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a) Obs. mode HN1 (17.5%)

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(b) Obs. mode HN2 (13.0%)

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(c) HiRAM mode HN1 (23.7%)

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005−3

−2

−1

0

1

2

3

Year

(d) PCs

Obs. PC1Obs. PC2Hiram PC1

Page 52: Variability of tropical cyclone track density in the North Atlantic

  56

1069  

Figure 16: (a) Signal-to-noise ratio calculated based on an ensemble of three members of 1070  

the AMIP runs. (b) Ratio of the mean of the track density to its standard deviation in the 1071  

climatological runs (see also section 2b). 1072  

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(a)

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1.1

Longitude (degree)

Latit

ude

(deg

ree)

(b)

100W 80W 60W 40W 20W 0 EQ

10N

20N

30N

40N

50N

0.5

1

1.5

2