velocity analysis - home: earth and...

11
1 Velocity analysis Velocity analysis

Upload: dangdat

Post on 08-Sep-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Velocity analysisVelocity analysis

2

Effect of stacking on incoherent noise

Tools for Velocity Analysis

Constant velocity gather

CMP gather is NMO corrected at single low velocity for whole gather. Repeated for many other velocities.All gathers are laid side-by-side.

Disadvantages: poor resolution, only good SNR events can bechecked

Constant Velocity Stack (CVS)

similar to CVG, stacks instead of gather

Disadvantages: as CVG but you don’t even look at actual data

original correct overcorrected undercorrected

3

Tools for Velocity Analysis

Velocity Spectrum or Semblance

best modern method – Industry standard

define time window in which wavelet is containedcalculate hyperbolic trajectorymeasure coherency of trace signal, e.g. semblance

∑ ∑

∑ ∑

k M

k M

a

a

M 2

2

1 k – samples in time windowM – traces across gather

Tools for Velocity Analysis

contour semblance statistics as function of intercept time and stacking velocity

peaks show actual intercept time and velocity

advantage: optimal resolutionweak and strong events

disadvantage: none (as long as software allows interactive picking and displaying of results)

Velocity spectra can be distorted in areas with static problems

4

Stacking Velocity VS

Is the velocity that you have to put into the NMO equations such that the CMP gather stacks (adds) together best, i.e. the velocity that allows the best fit of the travel time curve on a CMP gather to the hyperbola within the spread length.Approximately equal to VRMS for small spreads

a) Actual data move-out

b) Best-fitting hyperbola

(stacking velocity)VNMO=VRMS

c) NMO approximation

(short spread)VNMO= VS

Multiple horizontal layers

Root-Mean-Square Velocity

21

2

=

N

i

N

ii

RMSt

tv

VN

ti= travel time through i-th layer

0

2

2

2 TV

xT

RMS

N ≈∆

NMO

x

5

Velocity Terminology

Average Velocity Va

Interval Velocity Vi

Stacking Velocity VS

RMS Velocity VRMS

Interval StackingVelocity VIS

timewayTwo

reflectortodepthx

−=

2

layerintimewayTwo

layerofthicknessx

−=

2

hyperbolatovelocityfittingbest=

21

2

=

∑∑

j

jij

t

tV

100

10

2

10

2

−−

−=

jj

jjsjjs

tt

tVtV

Dix equation

6

NMO Stretching

0t

t

f

f NMO∆=

As a result of NMO correction a distortion of the periodof a reflection occurs, particularly for shallow events

3) Constant velocity stack

After applying the NMO corrections using a constantstacking velocity traces are stacked producing asummed trace.Correct Vsversus time function chosen from the bestamplitudes in the stack

7

8

9

Multiple

suppression

post-stack

processing

In general, it’s likely that multiples have a slower NMO velocity than primaries at the same TWT

So if the primary is properly corrected, multiples will be

under-corrected (“v” is too big in x2/2v2t0)

10

Corrected gathers can be put into FK domain

Primaries plot on K=0 axis, multiple plot at range of +ve K

If a stacking velocity function between

primaries & multiples is used, primaries & multiples are over- and

under-corrected, so plot into opposite halves of K space

11