vertical integration copyright © 2006 pearson prentice hall. all rights reserved. strategic...
TRANSCRIPT
Vertical Vertical IntegrationIntegration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-11
Chapter 6Chapter 6
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 2
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-22
Mision Objetivos
Analisis Externo
Analisis Interno
Decisiones estrategicas
ImplementacionEstrategica
Ventaja competitiva
El proceso de administracion estrategica
Estrategia a nivel corporativo
A que negocio entrar?
Integracion vertical
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 3
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-33
Logica de la estrategia a nivel corporativo
Estrategia a nivel corporativo debe de crear valor
2) A fin de que los negocios dentro de la compania puedan tener valor por si mismos de manera independiente
3) Que el valor de capital no pueda ser creado a traves de inversion en portafolios
• La estrategia a nivel corporativo debe de generar sinergias que no son posible de crear en mercados de capital
• integracion vertical+ cadenas economicas de valor
1) A fin de que la compania como un todo crezca
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 4
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-44
Que es la integracion vertical
Porcesadoras de queso
Ejemplo de la pizza
Ganaderos
Agricultores
semillas
Distribuidoresde alimentos
Cadenas de Pizza
Consumidor final
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 5
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-55
Que es la integracion vertical?
procesadores
ganaderos
agricultores
semillas
distribuidores
Cadenas depizza
Consumidorfinal
Integracion hacia atras
Inegracion hacia adelante
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 6
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-66
Economias de la cadena de valor
Logica economica
La firma focal es capaz de crear sinergia conotras firmas
• La firma focal es capaz de generar beneficios mayores a los de la competencia
• reduccion en costos
• mejora en beneficios procesadores
ganaderos
distribuidores
Integracionhacia atras
Integracion haciaadelante
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 7
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-77
Ventaja competitiva
Si la integracion vertical cumple los criterios del VRIO, entonces puede generar una ventaja competitiva
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 8
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-88
Valor de la integracion vertical
Mercado vs. intercambio economico integrado
• el intercambio economico debe de ser tal que permitaMaximizar el valor de la firma focal
• los mercados y las formas de integracion permiten en intercambio economico
• asi las firmas buscan la manera de maxmizar sus beneficios
La integracion hace sentido cuando la firma focal puede generar mayor valor que aquel
en el que el mercado se crea
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 9
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-99
Valor de la integracion vertical
Consideraciones de valor
Apalan-camiento
flexibilidadOportu-nismo
• las capacidades deUna firma puedenSer fuentes de ventajaCompetitiva en otrosnegocios
• de no ser asi, noSe da el intercambio
• se puede generar alinternalizar
• internalizar puede ser menos costosoQue utilizar oportunismo
• internalizar es menos flexible
• flexibilidad se dacuando laIncertidumbre esalta
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 10
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-1010
Rareza de la IV
Integracion vs no integracion
• la estrategia de integracion puede ser rara si integra o no lo hace pues esta NO depende la forma que la empresa tome sino quer depende en el valor generado
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 11
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-1111
Imitabilidad de la IV
Forma vs funcion
• la forma, per se, no es costosa de imitar
• la funcion de valor puede ser costosa de imitar si:
•la combinacion de los recursos y capacidades le da:
historicidad unica
Abiguedad causal
Complejidad social
Requerimientos de capital son limitados
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 12
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-1212
Imitabilidad de IV
Modos de entrada
• adquisicion de desarrollo interno
• las alianzas estrategicas son un ejemplo de la IV a menos costo
• adquriri un proveeedor en vez de generarlos
• los limites son las capacidades y recursos de las empresas
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 13
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-1313
Organizacion
Functional Structure (U-Form)
Accounting Finance Marketing HR Engineering
Conflict
Con
flict
OriginalBusiness
NewBusiness
OriginalBusiness
NewBusiness
NewBusiness
NewBusiness
NewBusiness
OriginalBusiness
OriginalBusiness
OriginalBusiness
Cooperation
Cooperation
CEO’s Role
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 14
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-1414
Organizacion de la IV
Metodos de control administrativo
Que se necesita controlar?
• cooperacion y conflicto entre areas
• integracion de nuevos negocios
• los esfuerzos para generar sinergias
• horizonte de tiempo entre administradores
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 15
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-1515
Expansion Internacional
Cost(capital en riesgo)
Controlexportacion
licencia
franquicia
Alianza estrategica
inversion
bajo alto
alto
adquisicion
Costo-Control tradeoff
Int. vertical
No IV
IV parcial
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 16
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-1616
Resumen
Integracion vertical…
• hace sentido cuando economias de la cadena de Valor se pueden crear y capturar
• puede peritir a algunas companias apalancar sus capacidades• puede ser una respuesta al oportunismo y la incertidumbre
• como un tipo de intercambio NO es raro ni ostoso de imitar
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 17
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-1717
Resumen
La integracion vertical…
• es una decision importante de considerar para Posibles expansiones internacionales
• hace sentido en circunstancias especificas
• puede ser costosa si se hace mal
Propiedad puede ser costosa, integrarse solo cuando los beneficios son mas que los costos
Vertical Vertical IntegrationIntegration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-1818
Chapter 7Chapter 7
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 19
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-1919
Mission Objectives
ExternalAnalysis
InternalAnalysis
StrategicChoice
StrategyImplementation
CompetitiveAdvantage
The Strategic Management Process
Corporate LevelStrategy
Which Businessesto Enter?
• Vertical Integration
• Diversification
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 20
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-2020
Logic of Corporate Level Strategy
Corporate level strategy should create value:
1) such that businesses forming the corporate wholeare worth more than they would be under independent ownership
2) that equity holders cannot create throughportfolio investing
• a corporate level strategy must createsynergies
Therefore,
• economies of scope - diversification
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 21
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-2121
Integration and Diversification
Integration
Diversification
Custo
mer
Distrib
ution
Focal
Firm
Suppli
er
Raw M
ater
ials
ForwardBackward
CurrentBusinesses
NoLinks
ManyLinks
Unrelated Related
OtherBusinesses
OtherBusinesses
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 22
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-2222
Types of Corporate Diversification
Product Diversification:
Geographic Market Diversification:
Product-Market Diversification
• operating in multiple industries
• operating in multiple geographic markets
• operating in multiple industries in multiplegeographic markets
At a general level…
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 23
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-2323
Types of Corporate Diversification
Limited Diversification
Related Diversification
Unrelated Diversification
• single business: > 95% of sales in single business
• dominant business: 70% to 95% in single business
• related-constrained: all businesses related on mostdimensions
• related-linked: some businesses related on somedimensions
• businesses are not related
At a more specific level…
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 24
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-2424
Product and Geographic Diversification
Possibilities:
• single-business in multiple geographic areas
• single-business in one geographic area
• related-constrained in one or multiple geographic areas
• related-linked in one or multiple geographic areas
• unrelated in one or multiple geographic areas
Note:• relatedness usually refers to products
• seemingly unrelated products may be related onother dimensions
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 25
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-2525
Competitive Advantage
If a diversification strategy meets theVRIO criteria…
Is it Valuable?
Is it Rare?
Is it costly to Imitate?
Is the firm Organized to exploit it?
…it may create competitive advantage.
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 26
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-2626
Value of Diversification
Two Criteria
1) There must be some economy of scope
2) The focal firm must have a cost advantage overoutside equity holders in exploiting any economies of scope
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 27
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-2727
Value of Diversification
Business X Business Y Business Z
Independent: equity holder could buy shares of each firm
Value
Business X
Business Y
Business Z
Focal Firm
Value
+ +
EconomiesOf
Scope
Combined: equity holder buys shares in one firm
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 28
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-2828
Economies of Scope
Four Types
Operational
Financial
Anticompetitive
Managerialism
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 29
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-2929
Economies of Scope
Operational Economies of Scope
Sharing Activities
• exploiting efficiencies of sharing businessactivities
Example: Orbitz
Spreading Core Competencies
• exploiting core competencies in other businesses
Example: Frito-Lay’s Trucking
• competency must be strategically relevant
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 30
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-3030
Economies of Scope
Financial Economies of Scope
Internal Capital Market
• premise: insiders can allocate capital acrossdivisions more efficiently than the external capitalmarket
• works only if managers have better information
• may protect proprietary information
• may suffer from escalating commitment
Example: Hanson Trust, PLC
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 31
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-3131
Economies of Scope
Financial Economies of Scope
Risk Reduction
• counter cyclical businesses may providedecreased overall risk
Example: Snow Skiis & Water Skiis
• individual investors can usually do this moreefficiently than a firm
however,
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 32
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-3232
Economies of Scope
Financial Economies of Scope
Tax Advantages
• transfer pricing policy allows profits in onedivision to be offset by losses in another division
• this is especially true internationally
Example: Ireland
• can be used to ‘smooth’ income
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 33
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-3333
Economies of Scope
Anticompetitive Economies of Scope
Multipoint Competition
• mutual forbearance
• a firm chooses not to compete aggressivelyin one market to avoid competition in anothermarket
Example: American Airlines & Delta: Dallas & Atlanta
Market Power• using profits from one business to compete in
another business• using buying power in one business
to obtain advantage in another business
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 34
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-3434
Economies of Scope
Managerialism
• an economy of scope that accrues to managersat the expense of equity holders
• managers of larger firms receive more compensation(larger scope = more compensation)
• therefore, managers have an incentive toacquire other firms and become ever larger
• even though the incentive is there, it is difficultto know if managerialism is the reason for anacquisition
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 35
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-3535
Equity Holders and Economies of Scope
Most economies of scope cannot be capturedby equity holders
• risk reduction can be captured by equity holders
Managers should consider whether corporatediversification will generate economies of scopethat equity holders can capture
• if a corporate diversification move is unlikelyto generate valuable economies of scope,managers should avoid it
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 36
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-3636
Rareness of Diversification
Diversification per se is not rare
Underlying economies of scope may be rare
• relationships that allow an economy of scopeto be exploited may be rare
• an economy of scope may be rare becauseit is naturally or economically limited
• a soft drink bottler buys the only source ofspring water available
• a hotel in a resort town creates a large water park,there are only enough customers to support one park
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 37
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-3737
Imitability of Diversification
Duplication of Economies of Scope
Less Costly-to-Duplicate Costly-to-Duplicate
Employee Compensation
Tax Advantages
Risk Reduction
Shared Activities*
Core Competencies
Internal Capital Allocation
Multipoint Competition
Exploiting Market Power
(codified/tangible) (tacit/intangible)
*may be costly depending on relationships
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 38
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-3838
Imitability of Diversification
Substitution of Economies of Scope
Internal Development Strategic Alliances
• start a new business underthe corporate whole
• find a partner with thedesired complementaryassets
Competitors may use these strategies to arrive at aposition of diversification without buying another firm
• avoids potential cross-firm integration issues • less costly than
acquiring a firm
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 39
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-3939
International Diversification
Three Types of International Risk
Cultural/Popular Financial Political
• product may not beaccepted simplybecause of yourcountry of origin
Example: Resistanceto McDonald’s byFrance’s oldergeneration
• currencyexchange
• generaleconomicconditions
Example: Asianeconomic crisisof the 1990s
• nationalization
• quotas
• tariffs
• regulations
Example: Bolivianationalized itspetroleumindustry in the ’70s
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 40
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-4040
International Diversification
Managing International Risks
Cultural/Popular• avoidance
• neutral branding (disguising country of origin)
Example: Where is Häagen-Dazs from?
Financial
• currency hedging
• geographic diversification
• spreading risk across several countries
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 41
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-4141
International Diversification
Managing International Risks
Political
• negotiation with governments
• political neutrality
• foreign governments often have an interestin direct investment
Example: Case International in Brazil
• find a local partner
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 42
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-4242
Summary
Corporate Strategy: In what businesses shouldthe firm operate?
• an understanding of diversification helps managersanswer that question
Two Criteria:
1) economies of scope must exist
2) must create value that outside equity holderscannot create on their own
Vertical Integration
Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage – Barney & Hesterly 43
Vertical IntegrationVertical Integration
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & HesterlyStrategic Management & Competitive Advantage - Barney & Hesterly 6-6-4343
Summary
Economies of Scope
• a case of synergy—combined activities generategreater value than independent activities
• may generate competitive advantage if theymeet the VRIO criteria
Firms should pursue diversification only if carefulanalysis shows that competitive advantage is likely!