vietnam er-pin may 26

8/10/2019 Vietnam ER-PIN May 26

1/92

1

()

. , , ,

.

F C F (FCF)

C F

E I (EI)

C: VIETNAM

E :

SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF FORESTS THROUGH LOW EMISSIONS

DEVELOPMENT PLANNING FOR GREEN GROWTH IN THE NORTH

CENTRAL AGROECOLOGICAL REGION

D : 26 2014


2/92

2

1.E E

1.1

.

M A R D (MARD)

G I

H.E. D. C D P

M

A N. N H , H, V

(84 4) 7332263

E @.

://...

1.2

, ,

. A .

C , C

E

GEEAL EIIE

V A

F (VNFOREST)

D. N B N

@.

L ERPIN

V REDD+ O D. N P H

@.

C ERPIN

FCPF D. P MC

01@.

I

ER P;

FCPF

V REDD+ F (

2010)

M. P H L

_71@.

T

ER P

M P

I

M. D N M M N REDD+

S C

N UNFCC F P,

M N R

E (MONRE)

D. N K H

@.

M N REDD+

S C

C E MA

M. N V X M N REDD+S C

M F M. N M H M N REDD+

S C

P VNFF, T H

P

M. L C C

[email protected]

F D, N A

M. N K L

[email protected]

D A

R D, H T

M. N X [email protected]

P

F P D,

Q B

M. P V B

[email protected]

P

F P D, M. L V Q P


3/92

3

Q T [email protected]

D A

R D, T T

H

M. T V T

[email protected]

GEEAL GAIAI

N D

O (SNV)

M. S S @. T A

WWF M. N N T

.@.

T F

(

)

W I M.K [email protected]

T

V A

F

M. P M T

T.@.

C

V A

F

M. D D

0142@.

C

C R

D U

A (CERDA)

M. V T H

@.

S ,

,

C

(CSDM)

M. L T T

.@.

S ,

,

D AD ECHICAL AE

T F D P D. C D

CD@.

T

FCPF D. P M C

M01@.

T

WWF M. N N T

.@.

F

V A F

S

D. V T P

.@..

T

ER

F I P

I

M. V T D

@.

T

ER

F I P

I

D. N D H

D28@.

T

F I P

I

M. N Q V

@.

T

IAE EC EK AD

AE

H W I

A HCMC

T: 08 3836 4788/66; F: 08 3836 4722

W: ..;

E: @. M.H

(0944 736 530), M. K (0988 002 616)

S FSC

V T F

P A VIFORES

W V. S FSC

G F T N

GFTNV C

WWFV

D13, T L I

V, CG .

C: L C U

E:

.@.

IPO B 151. H, V

T: 84437193049

F: 84437193048

S FSC


4/92

4

2.A EDD+

+ ,

N V R O (VRO)

M D. N P H

T D VRO

A R 409, B9 , N. 2 N H, H, V

T +84 912094190

E @.

W .VR.

2.1. E E

( ).

+ /

, . )

( ) ,

T ERPIN VNFOREST, V R O (VRO). T ER

PIN M MARD N REDD+ S

C , . I V N REDD+ S C

, M MARD

N REDD+ A P (NRAP), ,

REDD+ .

2.2. ,

+ .

T G V REDD

, D C L M

:

D 403/QDTT V 20142020 M 2014;

D 2139/QTT, 5/12/2011, N S C C;

D 799/QTT, 27/6/2012, N REDD A P (NRAP).

S P F E S (PFES)

V.

T

, ,

REDD+ (, F (FMS), B

(BDS)).


5/92

5

3.AEGIC CE AD AIALE F HE E GA

3.1 B

+ ,

. , .

T 23 REDD + .

T UN REDD II 2013 2015, N G

REDD+ L C, B K, H T, B T, L

D C M. T V N

REDD+ . T

REDD+ V REDD+ .V

R.

F RPP C

C 1 O : T (TWG) ,

; UNREDD+ P II ;

C 2 P REDD+ S: S ERPIN , SESA ESMF

SESA

REDD+;

C 3 D R S: A UNREDD JICA;

C 4 D : T MRV UNREDD

, SNV;

C 5 6 S M&E : .

3.2 C FCF

C ( EL/FL, EDD+ , EDD+ EF).

T FCPF , ,

Q B, Q T

RP N/D 2015.

M RP :

3.1 EDD+

A K

UNREDD P I 2009 N 2012 L 2012 ; A E

T A R A UNREDD

P V N (20092011) J 2012

C

P 2010

S KW TFF C

M CFM;

.. CFM; 5 ,

F P 2010

S FSC 46,814 QT TT H; FSC


6/92

6

A K

GIZ, KW, NGO

WWF, W B F S D

, .

PFES P

2011 D 99 PFES 2011

L PFES L D S

L 2010

UN REDD P II 2012 G J 2013;

ERPIN

F

R L

2012 D JICA. R

. D ER

PIN

VFD P

(

REDD+)

2012 I

,

P REDD + A

S , P

, PFES T H N A ( 2 ER

P )

C

(SUF)

2012 P SUF;

REDD+ SESA

P

2013 A

( SESA)

R FLEG 2012 D FLEG WWF KW,

C

REDD+ Q B

2012 A , , FPIC

GIZ; SESA

FCPF

E 2012

W 2013 RPP,

,

D

A 2014 G

. A A 2014

SESA

D ERPIN M 2014 U

I

E

N 2014

N N 2014

S

GRM

E

J

2015

M 2014 ; G GRM

,

SESA

SESA

SESA ESMF E

J

2015

S E S A SESA N

REDD+ A P E

S M F (ESMF) REDD+ ,

M 2014

P REDD+

A P (PRAP)

S 2015 D , 2 SFC,

TOR M 2014; FCPF PRAP 1 PRAP

2015

RP D 2015


7/92

7

3.3 C EDD+

:

)

() + .

)

/

() + ( , ).

)

.

T G D 4031

(GHG),

, GHG. O D

,

. I I C B

N C C C M P I

M A R D I F,

, / , 20132020. S

45% 2020,

. F REDD+ D

.

T D 403 N REDD A P (NRAP)

.A NRAP, 20112015, REDD+ REDD+ &

, ,

. B 2015, MARDVNFOREST ( UNREDD P)

P REDD+ A P

(PRAP) . A ER P

PRAP, DD,

. A ER P ( ) PRAP ,

.

T NRAP, D 403

N F P D P 20112020

13,388,000 ( 31 D 2010)

750,000 ; 1,250,000 , 1,350,000 ;

15,100,000 2020.

4.E

4.1 E

,

.

, .., ().

T ER NC AE R,

5.1 (16% V F 4.2), 80%

, 14% . T

. A 2500 : J

D , 85% S

1D 403/QDTT V 20142020; M 20

2014.


8/92

8

N J M. T T H, N

A, H T, Q B, Q T T T H 11 (12%

). T N W R D AE ,

S C AE R S. T

N A, V L W,

E S. A , ER

N A.

T FPD 44 % (2.3 ) ER

P 2012; (95%) , . O (1.7 )

; (0.9 )

. (S S 14

ER P).

4.1.1 Biodiversity conservation importance

T ER P (

F 4.2), 20 , 19

, W N A UNESCO M B R P NK B NP UNESCO W H S. T 14 E C

E , : A E, S, I T, 2.

F 4.1 F 4.2 F ,

2CEPF (2012); IUCN (2013).


9/92

9

F 43: 2005 F 43: 2010

4.1.2 Socio-economic status

T ER P .

N (29%) 11 3,

22% . T NC AE

USD 525 . O

; 45 ;

V4.

H, D T ; H T, MK . A V

,

K 5. E

:

I ( ) ( 14);

R ;

L 6.

4.1 , ( 2012 HL)

/ E

I % C

%

I C

%

N 20.7 100 8 100 100

N 28.4 16.5 9.7 14.6 12.0

R 27 91.4 10.7 94.4 70.3

U 6.0 8.6 1.5 5.6 29.7

3C GV


10/92

10

4.2. E E

/ :

)

;

)

( ).

T

42 D 2014 2015.

T V 5 10 2020, ER P

, , N F D P 20112020 T N A

P G G 20207 NC C . T

1

J 2016 D 31

2020.

5.D E

5.1 A ,

, .

A .

,

,

.

() / ().

5.1.1 Background (pre-2000) to main causes to deforestation

D K (1999) V : ;

; ;

, , . A A DB V

S F E (ADB 2000).

I ,

(.., , , , )

(ADB 2001:2), 8.

T VHLSS SFDP ,

(

, ) (ADB

2000:53), , ,

.

S F C (SFC) ,

SFC (L 2001:121). T

SFC

(V H T

2001:6) SCF

SCF S 14).

T ( )

7D 403/QDTT N A P V 20142020; 20

M

2014.8T ,

( ).


11/92

11

. T

. E

. V

P 135 135 II 30 , ,

P 30 (S 14

).

E V

RPP, ODA ,

, N C , R P

ER P (20002010): ) ; )

, ;

; , ; ) ,

, . T 5.1 () ,

, . T 5.2 ,

, /

. E .

5.1 C AE

D A

D

) F

S,

,

C (/ )

N/

I

I ( S )

U P (

; )

I ,

I

) F

:

,

(

);

;

(

)

S,

N/

N/

D

I EIA

W ( )

L

F

) L

S

H

N

L

I ( S )

I ()

I


12/92

12

D A

I ,

U

I ( )

P ( ; )

I

5.2 /

C AE

D

K

A

()

(2000

2010)

P

(, )

N/

P

S F

C

29,500 P

S

U

(

)

D

H 27,800

P

S

P

(A)

N/

,

;

C

S F

C

11,805

(

FPD)

P

S

L

T

H

S

F

C

2,160,000

( )

712,000

()

P

S,

U

(A)

D

H U (

)

P

S

P

N

S,

,

U,

A S,

P

,

N/

/

S,

,

U,

14 HEP

HEP

A

S,


13/92

13

D

K

A

()

(2000

2010)

,

,

.

P

N

S U;

A S

P

N

,

(67

)

S

U M

S,

I 20162020 , ,

. I Q T, , 4,233 , 5,250

, ; 205 (

) .

5.1.2 Drivers of deforestation

W

GIZ REDD+ Q B UNREDD+P II H T V F D (VFD) T H N A. I

ERP .

a) Planned forest conversion to agriculture

F N C C , ,

4,50010,000 /, , R P. H

( VND 60 / 2011, USD 2,850/)

. P

, . H,

, ( VND 40,000/

15,000 / ), . T

( ). I ,

, . T

A

,

. P

, .M ,

,

. M ( ),

1990. M , ,

. A ,

.


14/92

14

b) Unplanned forest conversion to agriculture (shifting cultivation)

S ,

, (T H, H T

Q B ), 12,800 (N A ) 14,500 (Q T

T TH ) (FPD 2011). S , , ,

( ) . S

HEP

, .

c) Planned forest conversion to forest plantation

I 235 / (

) 5,000 / ( ) . T

. B D,

V L,

J . I ,T

;

2008/09. S

.

I

. I

. O

. I

(SFE)

(.. TT H); , . T

. F

FSC ,

FSC M.

T A

, (

). I A

CSIRO A. S

, SFE

SFE. T SFE

, .

d) Impact of Typhoons

T

, ,

. W ,

. T

,

. T ,

FSDP WB 2009

5,720 ( 20% ) 1,100 ( 4%) . D A 02.


15/92

15

e) Planned forest conversion to infrastructure and hydropower

(i) Transport infrastructure

I . T

15 70% 100%

1999 2005 .F 19952006, 4 20 . I 2006, V

19.6 18.6 970,000 9,

10.1% ; V 4.2 2020, 4.5

.

T 20062010 VND 47.6 (US$ 3 )

20012005 I . T

' . S

359 2005. T

24%

90%

/ 55% . T .

M HCMC H 14;

( ),

. F E W : T H

V( 170); D H L B (55) H D N ( 368

).

(ii) Rapid urbanisation

R V

( A 03).

(iii) Hydropower and multi-purpose irrigation and hydropower

A 14

. F

R P, : 10

13,60021,700 .

C , ,

M I T

N P P D

11

, 424

12

M 2014.

C, P M 13

.

9C . 4 .

10B 1016 MW HEP .

11D 1208/QDTT A N M P P D 20112020

2030.12

T , ,

. S A 313R 11/NQCP G F 18, 2014 A P G R

NQ62/2013 N A ( H ).


16/92

16

5.1.3 Drivers of forest degradation

T . T

SFC,

K ( ). D

, R P. F , N

A 70% (4,524 2001, 1,308 2012)

(5,3943 2001, 2,881

3 2012). L

, 200,0003/

100,0003/, 2014 . A

,

SFM . T

,

. L ,

, ( )

. L , NTFP

, , ,

. A

( ) . C (..

( SFC P F M B SUF

M B) NTFP ,

NTFP, C . M

M B ( 14

)14

.

5.2 A EDD+

, /

.

T

N C AE R :

5.2.1 Commodity and service demand

S , , ,

. P (43%)

(5%)

( ,

).

U , .53.7% (HH) 1

30.7% HH 1 3 (R, 2011GSO).

M , , ,

. I ,

, . I

14T , NTFP, L L I B C S U F

V L L: HD B 2010, V C F. T ( ) C

R V.


17/92

17

, A A

.

H, (7

12 + A

) ,

( 5 ), , .

M .

F (HEP) . I () . Y,

REDD+ , , REDD+

,

.

R ( A 03).

5.2.2 Un-integrated land use and sector development planning

A , ,

; ( ) ,

( ..

/ 15

) ,

( 14

) (MONRE, MOLISA, MPI)

. T 16,, .

L ,

, ,

HEP , ,

, , EIA.

W , .

15W V

, , , , , , () . ,

, ,

.16 Quang Binh revealed provincial guidelines (Land use Planning and Land allocation, Forest Protection and Developmentregulations, Village Development Planning) approved as legal Decisions which show a high level of compliance with and strongemphasise on participatory planning and decision- making procedures which are seen as a strong competitive advantage for QuangBinh province compared to the general national PLRs. However, during actual implementation in the field overlapping mandates

of relevant authorities and insufficient state budget often hamper a full compliance with respective guidelines with elements of participatory decision-making processes often only complied with under ODA project supported implementation. GIZREDD+ Social and Environmental Safeguards Project November 2013


18/92

18

5.2.3 Unsustainable use of forest resources

I ( ) , . O (2.2

6.7 ) V

.

U . D C P C

/ ,

D CPC.

I ( ) (CFM) ,

L L 2003, ( 14 ) C,

,

ODA . T

, CFM,

.

I () .

I : ()

; () .

C .

5.2.4 Persistent rural poverty

L , ,

V,

, A 17

.

L 2010 V H LS S (VHLSS) 2012 G D S (GSO),

,

V VND 900,000/ (USD 43/).18

T (VND 300,000/;

USD 14/)N HH VND

450,000 , 43%

.

S : () ( ); ()

, , T S HEP T

H P, 23,000

; () .

17H, J CSIRO A

, J M. F, ,A

. Y P A P S A M, N

F V 10; 2011.18 T N (VND 740,000/; USD 35/),

S (VND 2,160,000; USD 103/.


19/92

19

5.3 D E

,

,

/ ,

(..,

/ ?)

T ER N C AE R

(LEDP)

(, ). T LEDP , PRAP (

NRAP),

(, ). I

,

:

A ,

, ,

AA .

,

A : ()

; () ; ()

, , .

T ER P ,

( )

, T 5.3.

5.3 E

C AE

D

1. E

) P REDD+ A

P (

)

A I

()

) I

A I

()

2. A

) I

P

P

3. F

) P

;

P

;

; I

U

) S

U

I

) P F

E S

U

;

P ;

) S

I I


20/92

20

D

) I

I

U ( V

)

4. I

) I

,

(

)

R ,

H

) P

) I

PRAP

EIA ;

5.3.1Enabling environment strategy

T ER

P, : () P REDD (PRAP)

, ; ()

(

).

a)

Provincial REDD+ action planning

M NRAP, PRAP ER P.

PRAP

, . I

ER P NRAP, PRAP

,

. PRAP ( ODA) P

. A PRAP

19

V ER P:

S I PREPARATORY ANALYSIS1.S ;2.D , ; 3.S

20

S II PARTICIPATORY PROCESS

1.P , ;2.P , ;3.P ; 4.P

19JICA, SNV, UNREDD.

20I .


21/92

21

S III ECONOMIC VIALBILITY

1.C ( / ) ; 2.E .

S IV REDD+ ACHITECTURE

1.S ;

2.I ; 3.S .

b)

Institutional strengthening

I , ,

PRAP . P

:

P ( );

S , .. (RIL; ERL);

C ;

S ( ).

A

. E

:

T

21;

T NTFP22

,

;

S .

c) Community forestry and benefit sharing

T

P, D, C

( 14 ),

. F , NTFP. O ,

. T , ,

. T

SFC, ( ,

21I , F S D (FSDP) B D, Q N, Q N, TT

H, N A T H KW (KW 6 Q N Q N)

. T FSDP

FSC KW 6 C F

M .22

C NTFP ( SNV, WWF, VCF) GIZ

NTFP.


22/92

22

, .) 23

.

d) Payment for Forest Environmental Services

PFES V , 2010

, 2013 31 24.H, PFES ,

.

5.3.2Agricultural sector strategy

S , ,

. T ( ) ,

( V A R D B V B

S P), , A .

W , 25

. R

MARD , ( ) (

) .

5.3.3 Forestry Sector Strategy

a) Production forestland allocation

I FPDP 164,000 , 35,000

32,000 2020,

ER P. T (750,000 )

, ,

. A

. A F

(FLA) ,

(S 2001), FLA

FLA 14 ). A

( )

. A

, ( ) V B S

P V A R D B

.

23F FSDP ( FSDP ) P M , P D D TT

H D M C H A D, B D P.24

C 247 PFES ( 161, 50, 36); 2012

1,154 B VND, 16.9 B VND 0.9 B VND; PFES S 201325

F , A N A : (VND 2.5 /; USD

120/); 45 (VND 6.0 /; USD 285/); A 57 (VND 10.8 /;

USD 512/ ( , ) (SNV 2010). FSDP

, (

) , , 1 7 US$412 US$5,072 ; (

) US$1,216 US$8,732 .


23/92

23

b) Sustainable production and forest certification

I , SFM

, .

P S F C CFM. A (;

NTFP) ( PFES; ) . RIL

. T FSC ( E N. A),

(M). A

FSC 20%26

. T FSC

FSC

. T

, 5 6,

: () (

), () ,

. T 5 6

. T

FSC , . I 67 , 12 15 ,

(

).T ,

,

( ), ,

,

. S

NTFP

.

T V FSC FSDP27

FSC GIZ SFC . T FSC 46,8145

Q T TT H. I Q T FSC KW SECO/WWF

28

, G V (GFTNV)

c)

Payment for forest environmental services

E,

. I ( S 9.4) ( S 15.1) ,

/ , /

, . T ER P:

C ( ) ;

26I Q T 24% 19 G F C S V: A E

T F.27

FSDP FSC (B D, Q N, Q N TT H)

784 .28

M A , 9:1, 2010 FSC

1998, 99, 2003, 04, 08; C 24% FSC A ( 19 )

FSC 13 , FSC 10 14 . G F C S V: A ; M. R. A; H E.

2012.


24/92

24

P ( 14

).

A

, , ( ). T

, , . C, , ,

P.

d)

Strengthened law enforcement

W A A, ER P

V : ()

; () ; () ,

( ER P

P )29

.S

:

()R , :

I ;

I ;

S FPD , .

() S , , ( , ),

:

I V L D T L AS FLEGT VPA E U

30;

S FPD , , ,

, .

() A ,

:

F , , , ;

M ,

(FPD, E P, G

D C, AM L I C);

29W B (2010) S R V F L E G; UNODC (2013) C J

R I T T V.30V VPA EU O 2014 VPA (2014

2016).


25/92

25

I FPD, ( , ), G D

C S P' P

T T .

() N

, :

E , ;

D ;

P V (UNTOC;

UNFCCC; FLEGT VPA).

e)

Improve forest advice to become more resilient to typhoons

T (

)

. A A

( ),

7 .

5.3.4 Improved energy sector strategy

F

. T

HEP ; HEP

. A

EIA FPDP

(L L 2013 F P D L 2004). T ER P

HEP L

E P. T EIA HEP ,

( ), ,

.

a)

Improve efficient energy use

A

( ) MDF 31

( , Q T32

, T H

) .

b)

Renewable energy and biogases

R 33

.,

. V

. B

31

A S A E P: V E O E E, M 201032US$65.8M MDF 120,000

3 2015.

33GIZ .


26/92

26

10 . B 10 3 ,

, . T

(


27/92

27

I

( )

I

;

R

(

34

)

S

(H

, ,

)

WB;

A

,

WB

/

;

H

,

;

S

;

P

;

C

, RIL

;

C

H

;

N

;

S

C

H

S

P

R

D

G

P A

P

;

R

L S TA

6. I , C,

6.1 E

,

, ,

.

6.1.1 Design of the ER Program

a) Inputs from FCPF project to the ER program

34

A , A . S,

, .


28/92

28

T FCPF P D 2012 D N; Q T,

Q B

.

6.1 D, C FCF

D C I C C

35

Q B Q N

L T

T

S

L T

C T

K C

B M

XK

Q T D

H H

H L

H N

H

S

H L

H B

H N D

K N R (NR)

SUF;

T C

T M

T

P

P

L

T C: C 240

(100% V K )

DK

NR ( );L ;

F 34

; L SUF.

V SUF .

P :

, .

A 36

2013 Q B

1,324 1,072 , Q T 500 ,

L.

O FPD

.

b) ER-PIN preparation

A MARD, G

, NGO

. T

ERPIN.

I ER P REDD+, , ,

, , REDD+ GRM. T

, , GIZ REDD+ Q B, USAID VFD

, EU, SNV ( ERPIN ), UNREDD WB . A

, , NRAP RPP. F

, , .

( A)

(

ERPIN ) ,

.

35T

36

N N. 1 T FCPF S REDD+ V N M, 2014 ( V).


29/92

29

T (D 2012, M 2013 M 2013)

NRAP UNREDD P II

M. T VNFOREST MARD J 2014.

A A 15 H 29 A TT H ERPIN

ERPIN , NGO .

c) Experiences from UN REDD Vietnam Programme Phase I

E UN REDD V P I 37

ERPIN , , 2011 UN REDD 19

.

T UN REDD 2013/14 H T

( ).

6.2

,

, , . ,

, .

P ER , 6.1

, FCPF, D P ,

, . T

, D TT H, T H, H T

N A.

A 38

, : () , ( ,

, , NGO, NGO, P,

D, C ); () , , ()

; () ; ()

; () M&E .

T FPIC UNREDD

GIZ Q B 39

FPIC .

T

:() , ;() ,

. T .

W, , ;

. F ,

. T

BDS, MRV .

37A E T A R A UNREDD P V N (20092011)

J 2012.38C S S C P, FCPF, A 2014.

39S E S REDD+ Q B, GIZ, A 2014; FPIC G REDD+ Q B, GIZ, A 2014


30/92

30

E ,

. S

, . T

. F , , 6.2 ,

( , ,

.. F P

M B S U F M B S F C).

I ,

. S

. T : ()

; () P F (

ESMF)40

,

, . T ER

ESMF (F P M B, S

U F M B, SFC) 41

( S 14). .

A

( F 4.2), 20

, 19 , UNESCO42

. A

SESA EMSF,

ERPIN

( ). T

, S U F,

. T EMSF .

7.

7.1 I

(, ), (..,

, , ).

7.1.1 Executing agencies and main stakeholders

T V N REDD+ S C, M M A R

D (MARD) (J 2011) P M,

REDD+ , , , NGO

. I, V N REDD+ O

40T ESMF

W B .41

T (D 126 QD TT P

(BSM) 2

F 2012)

.42T W N A UNESCO M B R P NK B N P UNESCO W H

S.


31/92

31

REDD+ S C VNFOREST, MARD

.

F 7.1 G

7.1 E

I F C

N

REDD+

S

C

(NRSC)

U P M, M

MARD

REDD+

ER P;

NRAP,

, REDD+

T O

G;

M N

R E

(MONRE); M

P I(MPI); M F

(MOF)

M S

T (MOST);

M F A

(MOFA); N E

C (CEMA).

M

A

R

D

(MARD)

T

, , ,

, /

,

24 /;

T V

A

F

(VNFOREST)

T

F S. R

ER ,

VNFOREST REDD+

, , NGO, CSO

REDD+

T VNFOREST N S C

REDD+ .

8 , 6

, 1 ;

L

F P

D

M E F GEF, ; A L L,E P


32/92

32

I F C

N

R

(MONRE)

L L B

.;

V

REDD+ F

(

2014)

T

, ,

, , ,

REDD+ V

N;

E REDD+ ,

,

, REDD+

V N;

I

REDD+

UNFCCC

( ,

) V N

N

T VREDD+ O

(VRO)

E 2011 V N N REDD+

P. N ,

NRAP. T MRV

I

NRAP. T VRO

VNFOREST.

1 5

N

REDD+

N

P , ,

REDD

V N.

C ,

U

,

E

REDD V N ,

C C

G ,

NGO, CSO, U,

,

S

T REDD (, MRV, BDS,

, ,

)

R

VNFOREST, REDD N

F P (VNFOREST),

FSIV, FIPI, F

U, D

M C

C (MONRE), FSSP CO,

UNDP, FAO, JICA, GIZ,

ICRAF,

VNFOREST

P

REDD+S

R P REDD+

A P. I , P PC P REDD+ S C


33/92

33

I F C

C REDD+ . T ER P

PPC VRO

.

P

A (

FPDF) ,

; D

;

P' C;

P

D FPD

A

S F

C

F

M

B

S ,

F

P F

F

P I ,

, , (,

.) REDD+

V (VIFORES)

FSC

B D P

FSC FSC

FSC . D FSC V

M.

C,

,

T ,

REDD+ (

) ,

;

W

C A NGO .. SNV, WWF,

C S R D (SRD);C

R D U A (CERDA); C

S D M A (CSDM)

REDD+ .

7.1.2 Financial management

EDD+ F:( 2014) F

F V N (VNFF) D 05/2008/NDCP 14/01/2008

G REDD+. T V REDD+ F

, , , V N.

EDD+ F REDD+ , ,

, ,

, REDD+ C G. T ,

, N REDD+ F,

// REDD+.


34/92

34

7.1.3 Technical and strategic guidance

a) Technical working groups

T VNFF M U

N REDD+ N, N T W G (TWG) ST W G

(STWG).

T TWG REDD+. C

T W G : G, MRV, B

D S, L I, S P S I. A

REDD+ ,

.

b) NGOs and Civil-Society Organizations (CSOs)

T NGO P

,

. A NGO

REDD+ .

c)

Expand role of private sector

T

( B D TT H P). T

FSC FSC .

7.2 L EDD+

+ .

T ER P N REDD+ A P. I 2016

2020, V REDD+

. T REDD+.

F7.2 L AD FF EDD+


35/92

35

T F 7.2 REDD+ N REDD+ S C,

VRO, REDD+ STWG ER P.

T M A R D, VNFOREST VNFF

F D, FPD F P D F43

ER . T VNFF :

T ,

;

T , ,

;

T , ,

;

E , , ,

.

T (VNFF) F

P D F (FPDF) :

() O :

T VNFF , , MARD;

T F F M C, C B M

A , T F F ( VNFF)

VNFF ;

T MARD F .

() O :

A F VNFF

P C ,

P C A R D

D;

T P C

A R D D.

7.4 E (EL/FL, E

, , , .). .

T ER P

: () ; () 41 D (

); ()

( ).

7.2 E

K L

D

SESA

ESMF

F SESA .

F ESMF

C

MARD ESMF

;

U

2015

43FPDF; G' D N. 05/2008/NDCP 14

J 2008).


36/92

36

K L

D

D

ER

PRAP,

S

; F

MARD,

P

6 PRAP 2014

2015

FLA U

( 41 D)

MONRE; FPD,

P,

D

U

,

FLA

2014

2015

SFM I

MARD, FPD,

P,

D

P

CFM

2014

2015

C

I

MARD,

P,

D

T

2014

2015

PFES C

PEFS (

T H N A

)

MARD,

P

D PFES A

P

2014

2015

FLEG I

MARD, FPD

P

S

2014

2015

C

U

MARD W

2014

U ER/R

B ER/R MARD 2015

O SEDP

P

C S E

(SEDP)

ER

MARD,

P

S SEDP

ER

P

2015

S

REDD+

VNFF

E REDD+ VNFF

;

MARD N REDD+

2014

E

MRV

E MRV

UNFCCC

MARD

MONRE

N MRV

2014

2015

ER P

E ER

VRO, FIPI, VAF A P

2015

2016

F

/

MARD G. ;

ODA,

F

2016

B

NFI

VNFOREST FIPI 2016


37/92

37

7.5 F ( $ )

.

.

,

, . A

T ER FCPF .

I US$ 37,5 10 41

. T US$ 72,31 ER. T

ER ( A 1

).

T REDD+

.

A ER .

8 L E E

8.1 A E L (EL) / F L (FL)

/ .

/

, () / (

/).

8.1.1 Setting up the REL/FRL in Vietnam

U UNFCCC REL/RL 44

,

. A REL/FRL

V JICA45

. T

V. O RL

V. T :

L D RL LEAF ;

T H N A RL VFD ;

Q B RL GIZ;

I FRL UNREDD P II (L C, B K, H T, L D, B

T, C M).

S RL JICA

. T, JICA .

H, ,

N C . T N C , JICA

.

44UNFCCC D 12/CP.17 2011 REL/FRL , ,

, . T REL/FRL

RL,

RL .45 JICA. 2012. R S R

V. V A F. H.


38/92

38

a) Vietnams proposed REL/FRL

F REL/FRL, V

N , JICA .

8.1. K EL/FL

D J

P

P:

A

B

G:

I CO2

AGB BGB

. N /

CO2.

A I

I

I

D

.

S

(

)

R P 20002010 F N ,

1990,

5 . T

2010.

D

M : 10%

M :

5

1.5

3

M : 0.5

T

8.1.2 Methods used for emission/removals estimation

a) Forest and eco-regions stratification

D V N,

. T,

. 12 : (1) E

(); (2) E (); (3) E (); (4) E

()46

; (5) D ; (6) B ; (7) M ;

(8) C ; (9) M ; (10) L ; (11) M ; (12)P.

T 14 47

: (1) C ; (2)

C I ; (3) I ; (4) L P ; (5) N

A ; (6) N I ; (7) N V ; (8) R

R ; (9) S C V ; (10) S

I ; (11) S A ; (12) S V

; (13) T S ; (14) T S M .

46

C N. 34. R, , 3

/. T , , 201300, 101200, 10100 10

3/ .

47WWF .


39/92

39

b) Estimation of emission/removals

E / S D M48

. T /

(20002005; 20052010) 20002010.

E / ,

. T V 12 14 . T 14

12 .

A 49

(NFI) . V N

NFI 1990 5 . A , V N NFI. T

REL/FRL NFI 3 (2000 2005) (2006 2010). NFI 3

L ETM+ 4,200 . T SPOT4 SPOT5 2,100

20062010. NFI

,

(, ). U JICA ,

5 10%50

.

C (CS) C 12 14

(3/) NFI.

T :

C( C/) = (AGB + BGB)*CF W AGB

BGB

CF (%).

AGB :

AGB = G*BCEF W: GS BCEF

(/3

)BCEF , (

3/)

51.

BGB

BGB = AGB*

W: R

. T R CF

IPCC R CF

0.24 0.47 52

.

E F S D M. T

( 2000 2005; 2005 2010).

F , ,

, . R , . T

. R (

).

48IPCC 2006 G N G H G I.

49A .

50 JICA. 2012. R S R

V. V A F. H.51

FAO. T 5.4. D (BCEF). T BCEF 8 (< 10, 1120, 2140, 4160, 61 80, 81120, 120200, > 200

3/).

522006 IPCC G N G H G I. C 4: F L


40/92

40

T /

53

.

H, ER , REL/FRL

. T T 2

/

UNREDD I. S REL/FRL . U

, .

T REL FRL, ,

V, FRL

C I . T,

RFL ,

. I ER , V N

.

8.2 E EL/FL E / .

.

8.2.1 Preliminary national estimates

T / ,

2000 2010 . T

/ . T, FRL ( M CO 2/)

ER V N ( T 8.2).

I

. I 2000 2010, N C,

N E C H. H, . I

, 869 M CO2. I

N C (S T 8.2).

8.2 E (+) () 20002010 FL

A E

(C2)

(C2)

E

(C2)

A FL

(C2/)

1. N W 79.8 133.3 53.5 5.4

2. N E 125.4 268.0 142.6 14.3

3. R R D 0.5 5.2 4.7 0.5

4. C 160.0 153.0 7.0 0.7

5. S C 75.5 93.2 17.7 1.8

6. C H 116.6 141.7 25.1 2.5

7. S E 43.0 55.3 12.4 1.2

8. M D 16.0 19.3 3.3 0.3

616.8 869.1 252.2 25.2

53T . T 8 : ) N W; ) N E;

) R R D; ) N C; ) S C; ) C H; ) S E; ) M D.


41/92

41

T ER N

C. T N A, T H Q B . T

2000 2010 N A, T H Q B 4.7, 3.9 3.1 M

CO2 .

H, . O 6 ER ,

(Q T T T H) ( T 8.3).

T ER . I

ER N C R,

.

8.3 E (+) () 2000 2010 C

E

(C2)

(C2)

E

(C2)

A FL

(C2/)

1. T H 39.3 37.3 1.98 0.20

2. N A 47.1 41.3 5.85 0.58

3. H T 16.7 14.9 1.83 0.184. Q B 31.2 29.3 1.91 0.19

5. Q T 14.0 15.2 1.21 0.12

6. T T H 11.7 15.1 3.34 0.33

160.0 153.0 7.0 0.70

8.2.2 Summary of the approach to uncertainty

T REL/RL JICA54

5

, 1990, 2010, RL

. T ,

:

F E F, BE ;

F , ;

S , , S

BE , (WWF ). A

E BE ;

T , AE BE , ,

. T

. F ,

E F (R), N I ( BE

) 144 N ( AE ) 191.

T, BE . T

E F (M) E F (P). A

(S CV

N ). O , BE

54T S P F L R C C F T S R V, J

F T A, JICA, M 2012.


42/92

42

B F M T B F ,

, E F ;

T , : , , ;

,

.

9.F

9.1 D E

, .

F ER , (FMS) ER

ER P. T D 11/COP19, FMS

. C, V :

9.1.1 National Forest Inventory, Monitoring and Assessment Program (NFIMAP)

B P M D, NFIMAP F I P

I (FIPI) 1991. S , 5 55

. I , ,

20112015. T NFI&S P ( ) . T

. E

1:100,000;

1:250,000 1:1,000,000. C IV

( 1:25,000) ( 1:50,000) . D

. T NFIMAP

20162020 .

9.1.2 National Forest Inventory and Statistics Projects

B P M D, NFI&S P NFI&S

P 20112016. I NFI&S P,

: () F RS

( );

() F

(

). T (

S 14 ) . A

, . T

1:10,000 1:25,000 , 1:50,000 , 1:100,000

. D ,

. T

AGB . T FIPI

VNFOREST. F ,

FIPI V F U.

9.1.3 Annual Forest and Forestry Land Monitoring and Reporting Program

T F P D (FPD) 200156

. B

NFI&S P, ,

. T

. D FPD

. T

, , , , . H,

55C I: 19911995; C II: 19962000; C III: 20012005; C IV: 20062010.

56B D N. 32/2000/CTBNNKL 27/03/2000 MARD.


43/92

43

, : () ; ; ()

.

D REDD+, V MRV F D57

.

T V REDD+

. T ER P FMS MRV F D

, , GHG / (A D; AD) /

(E/R F; EF/RF). T, ER P FMS ,

(MMR) AD EF/RF. I , AD

EF/RF .

S S 8.1 AD

EF/RF NFIMAP,

/ .

a) Generating activity data

A , AD (LMS),

. A

A A. T, A 3 IPCC.

A IPCC G, / . I LULUCF ,

/ /. T ER

P A A ( , , .)

.

b) Generating the baseline forest cover maps

A , V NFI&S P 20112016. I 2011

2012, B K H T 58

. I 20132014, NFI&S 13 C H

S W . I NFI&S 25 20142015

20152016. T,

AD ER P . I NFI&S

A A ER P. H, ER P ,

G V .

c) Annual update of the forest cover maps

A ,

. T : () U RS

(.., LANDSAT8, DMCI, .) (..

); () RS (.. VNREDSAT1, SPOT5, SPOT6)

, , , FPD,

. T FPD

59

. FIPI RS

.

T LMS :

A (, , A A);

A , ;

A , .

57

UNREDD V P (2011) M, R V F D. 1.3.58H T A A ER P.

59B D N. 32/2000/CTBNNKL 27/03/2000 MARD.


44/92

44

d) Estimating emission/removal factors

T R L NFIMAP EF/RF. H, NFIMAP

20112015 NFI&S . T NFA P

FAOF F C P NFIMAP (

P ) NFIMAP

20162020 .

T NFI&S P,

. T ,

NFIMAP. S NFIMAP 20112015,

NFI&S P

(.., 2016) ER P. I NFIMAP 2016

2020 . A , NFIMAP

(.., 2020) ER P. O,

NFI&S 2020 A A

C . F C

ER P, EF/RF . (F

, IPCC C .)

T NFIMAP NFI&S P (..

, , ) . M

, , . T, IPCC

.

e) Developing country-specific allometric equations

F / IPCC T 2,

/ . T NFI

EF/RF . P I UN

REDD V P

. I ER P A A,

EF/RF.

f) Estimating emissions/removals

F GHG / LULUCF

, , R 1996 I P C C (IPCC) G

N G G I ( R 1996 IPCC G), 2000 IPCC

G P G U M N G G I (

GPGUM) 2003 IPCC G P G L U, LU C F

( GPGLULUCF). T GHG

/ LULUCF V S N C UNFCCC,60

V N C UNFCCC.

g) Quantifying uncertainties

U R L E R . T

ER , 3 :

S1 I : F,

AD, EF/RF /

. N,

/.

S 2 M : U

. S

,

ER P. R

60 M N R E, 2010. V N S C U NF C C C


45/92

45

/. A

ER .

S 3 Q : U R L

MMR , ,

E R ER P. U ER

M C . T ,

. T 90% .

h) The information system

A FMS, . T GIS

FMS ,

, . D

R L, /

. T

:

F ;

D , (.., ; ; ), ; C , ;

C / ;

E /, ;

D ;

E , , / , ;

D ;

R , ;

M , .

I , , / :

A ;

A (.., );

E/R ;

A R P;

A ;

A , .

I ( S 9.5)

, , . .

I V, D M I S F S P I (FORMIS I)

(20092013)

. T FORMIS : ()

FORMIS ; ()

, ,

; ()

. H,

, FORMIS . T

D M I S F S P II (FORMIS II)

M 2013 2018. T

FORMIS I. I ER P , G V

A A FORMIS FORMIS

ER P.


46/92

46

9.2 D E () EDD+

.

T REDD+ .

E A F F L M

R P, , . P REDD+ A A ER P

S A A ER P , ER P

REDD+.

A , ER P

NFI&S NFIMAP P. I

(.., ) NFMS,

(.., ER

). T , ER P

REDD+

( 8.1).

9.3 D E FCCC

F FCF C F.

9.3.1Monitoring system consistency with UNFCCC guidance

T ER P UNFCCC :

I ( ) ( ) GHG

, .

I T, A, C, C C(TACCC) :

o T: K , , (

);

o A: A . A QA/QC

;

o C: A REDD+ , / , ERP

A A);

o C: T ER P UNFCCC ;

o C: T ER P /, AD, RS

,

, EF/RF, NFIMAP 20112015 ,

NFI&S

(.., 2016),

NFIMAP NFI&S ;

T GHG LULUCF V N C UNFCCC.


47/92

47

9.3.2 Consistency with the emerging methodological framework of the FCPF Carbon Fund

T ER P M F

FPCF C F, :

T ER P , , ,

,

, ( C 3 FCPF M F);

T ER P , , ER MMR GHG ( 10%

,

) ( C 4);

T ER P R 1996 IPCC , 2000 IPCC GPGUM 2003 IPCC GPG LULUCF, C P

(

C 5);

T ER P , ( C 6);

A , ER P TACCC , , ,

( C 14);

T RL E R ( I 14.1);

A ER T ERPA, A (, )

IPCC A 3 ( I 14.2);

N / / R L MMR. T

IPCC T 2 , (

I 14.3);

T ER P N F MS, , ,

ER P NFMS,

ER

( I 15.1);

T ER P F M S / /

AD EF/RF, , / ( C 16).

9.4 D I

E .

B (PFM) 61

, ER P

NFMS, 2020. T ER P ,

61 I: NFI&S , GV B K H T ; P C M (PCM) UNREDD

L D ; P (PFM) L D DARD L D .


48/92

48

A 32.2 (2004) F P D L62

.L

:

() D, ( CFM);

() I (.. SFC

), PFES .

T ER

:

()P :

I , , ;

C (AGB), , EF/RF;

A ( ) REDD+, , NFI&S .

() N ( S 9.5):

I / REDD+, PRAP ( S 5.3);

C , / NFMS

() I :

C AD AGB / NFMS

PFM ER P ( )

FPD, (

, ), .

9.5 D E

, , .

T ER P, PRAP

, ,

( ) REDD+

( S 5.3). T () S 16

ER P PRAP: 1) ; 2)

; 3) .

T : PIAM PPRAP. B

: ) ; )

PRAP. T , PRAP ,

:

62 [ S 14 ]

, ,


49/92

49

()T PRAP ;

() T , , ;

() T PRAP

T E S M P63

,

PRAP. S, E S M R,

,

. D

, L D PFM , P

G M UNREDD P. A

(S 9.4), /

( ) FPD.

T , ER

,

, NFIMAP ( S 9.1), N B

M S. A ( AGB) , NCB

PRAP ER P,

PRAP. D FPD

, (, FCPF C

F M F64

UNFCCC C ).

10 D

10.1 A

D ()

.

( ),

. ,

, ,

,

() +

.

T ER P

T 10.1 . A ER P ,

NFMS ( NFIMAP ),

NRAP, ER P . R

NFMS ( S 9.1). T NRAP

,

. C, ER P

NRAP.

63

I , PRAP / , , SESAESMF NRAP.64

I 35.2.


50/92

50

10.1

A D

D I

1. P

L

;

L

;

A , ,

,

,

( )

2. S

L

V

R

L,

A A

N

L

. B

A A,

A A,

3. P F

E

S

L

PFES

;

L PFES

,

L

PFES,

,

4. S

M

V

M

L

L

; FLEGT VPA

10.1.1 Domestic displacement

T ER P,

. H, , :

() T ER P ;

() T ;

() T ER P ( CFM ), , ,

( PFES);

() T .


51/92

51

10.1.2 International displacement

T . V

65

. V

,

UNFCCC, . N, GV

ASEAN

. I M U

, L C, V FLEGTVPA 2010

2014. F, L FLEGT. T ER

P VPA (L D T L A S)

, ,

.

11

11.1

( .., , , ).A /

, () +

.

R GHG , , ,

( ), ,

( ). T 11.1

. T ER,

, PRAP .

V REDD+ , NRAP

( ) . C, ER P

NRAP .

11.1 ,

L

A

E

( )

M ()

ER P

P

PRAP;

PFES

I

L ..

;

I

,

; HEP

HEP ;

HEP PM

P PRAP;

I L ER C

65I 4

3 , L (

N C R V, M ( FSC ). T V 100 , U S A (37%), EU (15%) J (15%).

A 100% V C; J, K, T.


52/92

52

L

P P ;

;

(

5.3);

( 9.4)C M

I ,

PRAP

;

( 50 )

T M T

A

F L DD;

M VNFORESTS;

(V

FPD)

D ER P , VRO :

A ER ERPA;

M ER P ;

M ER FCPF C F ERPA;

R ERP.

I ER P , A A ER

ER ER

, C F C F

M F .A ER P

A A P. V

C F . I ER, ERP , REDD+ NRAP,

/

.

12 E

12.1 E E (E)

/ ( %

). B %, , 2,

:

)

31, 2020 ( )

)

10 ;

) , 10 .


53/92

53

B N C

, ER , . W

ER V ,

. T V N . A ,

20% 202066. I

12 MCO2 8.6 MCO2 ER ( T 12.1).

12.1 E E 20162020

I

()

E

(C2)

(C2)

1.

1.1. R 20%

(H , , )

WB)

17,000 4.37

1.2. I

20%

12,000 3.08

1.3. S

, RIL

;

250,000 4.59

2. F

2.1. E

(

15%)

300,000 2.75

2.2. P

( )

200,000 5.87

/ (C2) 12.04 8.62

12.2 FCF C F

,

,

.

T

C F 2020. I 2012, V

, 20 % 2020. C V

G ER C F,

C F 10.3 MCO2 50% 20162020

12.1.

13 E E A (EA) E

F (EF)67

66

D 1775/QDTT P M 2020.67T SESA FCPF REDD+ RPP REDD+

. T ESMF SESA


54/92

54

13.1 EA/EF

' A ,

.

a) Summary of progress

W SESA , ,

, SESA

SESA

SESA ,

SESA : () ,

, , , ;()

; () .

V NRAP. T

V , ( ;

; ) (CSS)

NRAP.

b) Progress on policy gaps

I F 2012, (STWGSG) 68

,

(VRO) (CSO) (SNV). D 2012, STWGSG

REDD+ ,

REDD+: W B O P, SESAESMF ; UNREDD S

E P C (SEPC); CSO REDD+ S E S

(SES). T CSS ,

( , PLR),

NRAP.

T 2013, 69

V

PLR 70

C

STWGSG 71

D 2013. T ,

, (

) (PLR) . T NRAP

UNFCCC (C) UNFCCC G

W B O P FCPF C F O P

W B.

T (

) ,

STWGSG. I (FGRM) FCPF SESAESMF 2014. I

UNREDD P II P. A

, CSS ,

2015, NRAP

, , / /

REDD+ .68

T STWGSG N REDD+ N , ,

, CSO, .69

54 PLR 1.0; 60 PLR 2.0.70

R, D., R, J., K, S., R.,&R, U. (2013)A . CE,

L, U K.71T , , V

E REDD+ V .


55/92

55

(20162020). T NRAP

ER P, PRAP,

PLR, , FGRM .

I CSS

3.2, NRAP PRAP, V

SESAESMF . T

2014:

I. P I A M (PIAM) L D MBREDD ;

II. P P REDD+ A P (PPRAP) B T UNREDD P II P, , H T ER P .

T SESAESMF SESAESMF

FCPF R (20142015), REDD+ ,

, /

.

c) Progress on drivers of deforestation and forest degradation

D

ERPIN

JICA 72

GIZ REDD+ 73

Q B

VFD P T H N A74

UN REDD

.

d) Preliminary work on the social risk and potential impacts

I REDD+ , REDD+

75. I

S U F F S D P SIA, EIA76

S

U F . T

SESA .

e) Value of added by the SESA and EMSF

I SESA ESMF REDD+

REDD+ ,

72JICA. 2012. R S R

V. V A F, H.73

REDD+ Q B, A D D F D, GIZ, N 2013.74

V F D P V ,

. T G V

REDD+ . V F D

P T H P: P S R S, 2013 N A P: P S

R S 2013.75

REDD+ Q B S E S, Q B N 2013; REDD+ Q B

F P I C, Q B N 2013. VFD 61.76

F S D P (FSDP): E I A U E M

M P A F E ( T H N A) O 2011; S IA N A T H P; I V C

F, ( FSDP) S S R SUF 20102012.


56/92

56

: ()

; () SESA (

). T EMSF , ,

(

) ,

, ESMF REDD+ , , ( ) (

) ( NRAP).

13.2 I EA / E

B 7.1,

/ A .

.

A

, ?

T NRAP CSS ,

PRAP ER

P. T PLR

W B C . S

20142015,

, , FGRM NRAP

PRAP ( ER P).

P PIAM PPRAP SESAESMF V

2015, (H T) ER P. R ,

, , ,

ER P , PRAP P

20152016.

A ER P

E S M P (ESMP), PIAM PPRAP

REDD+ NRAP. ESMP :

P ( ) ;

M PRAP NCB ;

I SMART ;

C PRAP .

T PRAPESMP SESAESMF FCPF

R 20142015.

V (

); ;

,

. C, PRAP ( ESMP)

ER P, SESAESMF NRAP, .

T PLR 2.0 FCPF

(W B) NRAP; ER P

T 13.1. T SESAESMF NRAP, 20142015, .


57/92

57

A M F, W B

UNFCCC C

. S ,

, V N REDD : VR.

13.3 F

()

.

U V , P, L R (PLR)

. I ,

V ,

. T ,

. V L C L D (2011)

.

T

, T L L (A 132, 135 ) L F P

D (A 84 ),

C . T

D P M MONRE ( 14.1) L L. F

L F P D D /

. D

/ .

I D 99 PFES ,

.

A , . A

P F SESA

ESMF ( 13). T FCPF C S77

, ,

P

F. T FCPF R G

( ) FCPF

. T P F ( ESMF)

ER P. I :

T 78

L L,

CPC, D PC, PPC. I

D C 45 PPC. T D C

V .

G ( V ) .

C , , , , ,

77C P, FCPF, A 2014.

78

G . F , ()

, () .


58/92

58

NGO V .

T C P C, ;

.

K : () ; () .

P I P (

FCPF ).

C ,

, L A

( L C D)

D P79

.

A FCPF SESA EMSF

( )

.

14 L

14.1 ,

,

+

/ .

14.1.1 Land administration and use status

W , 80 V

81

. T

:()

82

(C, D, P );()

, , SUF SFC

83

; ()

,

KW ; () ,

, 84

79I R P F W B

(FSDP VCF), T S H P (C, C C RA, 2011).80I V , , .81

T L L 2003 (A 46 47)

L L .82

C , A 135 138 L L 200383

R SUF,

SUF, V C F, ,

WB, GEF, T N, T F F (TFF) 20052013.84

D 126 /QDTT P (BSM) ,

(SUF) 2

F 2012. U , SUF

(SUF 95,786

SUF ( 11,882 SUF, VCF 2013) , . T

D NTFP. P D


59/92

59

, ,

; () FLA

D 2010 1.8 L U C

MONRE 8,843,000 69.4% 85

.

B , V , :

P , , , , , , . P

: ; , ;

.

S (SUF) ( , ), , ; ;

, ; ,

.

P , NTFP, . P : , .

T NC AE R ,

F 14.1.

F 14.1 F C AE , 2012,

( 2012, AD

14.1.2 Statutory forest and agricultural land tenure

A 2013 C, 2003 L L, 2013 L L 2004 F L,

. T /

(, , )

. T G , ,

, (),

(5070 ) .

SUF (>5,000 ) . S

(


60/92

60

, PFES

, CFM . T

. T : , , , , ,

,

().

L () , 684,864 (80.3%),

17,103 (50.7%) 1.83 (75.9%)

NC AE R (MONRE 2012). T

86

S (,

). 66.7% 30% .

A 22.0%. H, 54.5%

. T (1.2% )

. T

, ,

87

.

F , . N 84.0% 835,200

( F 14.2).

F 14.2 B C AE , 2010 (E

2010)

86M B P F, SUF M B, , P, D C, .

87A L L C L,

(A 71 A L ,

71.4 L S

)

, .. ; , ,

, ,

D , ,

. T (BSM) D 126

NTFP. I B M

.


61/92

61

a) Customary forest and agricultural land tenure

C L F V (

88

), , G

: / ;

, ;

.

b) Forest resource access rights

T 2014 ,

: () ; () ,

FSC SFM . T F M R (D

186/2006/QDTT) , NTFP,

. D 99/2010/NDCP PFES

HEP , ,

. I

, 80% PFES

. 10% F P D F, 10% .

c) Agriculture and forest land tenure and use issues

L : ( F 14.3). M 560,000 60,000 CPC R .

F 14.3 () C A

E , 2006 (G 2006)

F : R , 0.4 , 0.2 ( F 14.4). T,

, , , A .

88H, L L . A 71.4 L S .

T (BSM) D 126 NTFP. I

B M .


62/92

62

F 14.4 ()

C AE , 2006 (G 2006

P : . T . U

A .

A , , , .

14.1.2 Overview of actions to assess the land tenure and processes for communities to engage in the proposed programinterventions

a) Processes used to establish the land tenure situation at the commune and village level

L P, D D N

R E) . T P

D . T

. A L

A C C . T C L O

.

W ,

P D . U ,

V,

C . F

, ,

, , . T LUC

. H, LUC ,

C, 89

. A LUC

, . W

, . T

, LUC, , C

. W

90

. T FPIC

, , , . L

, ,

. T

89

A .90S , NTFP .


63/92

63

91

. T FLA

FLA. T

FLEG . T

.

b) Traditional use of Protection, Special Use Forest and Production Forest

T , .. ,

, C ,

( NTFP ) , ,

C , . S

F P C,

, , , NTFP

.

F , , P F S U F,

( FP C , )

M B. T

, ,

, . T SUF

, ( ), VNFOREST

92

, (..

NTFP) SUF ( SUF)

SUF M B. F D

, , NTFP ,

NTFP. T ,

. T , ,

SUF , VNFOREST

D , D 126. T

FLEG .

W ,

SFC, , CFM , ,

50 , D , , ,

. T

, . T 5 ,

NTFP NTFP . T

. T CFM ,

91T NGO . H,

M B , , B M NP SUF MB

D 126 BSM ,

7 .92

D 126 / QDTT P (BSM) S 2

F 2012: W B M NP, H L S NP X T NR; I SUF MB

BSM . D G I B S M.


64/92

64

93

NTFP . W

. T

CFM FLEG .

14.1

K / E

I

L

()

U/

A

HH

L

CPC

L T I I

560,000

60,000

L

F

N CPC

L I

S

3 ,

G

200,000

L

SFM

S

S /

S

70%

SFM

L

(600,000 )

N

S CPC

,

94

600,000

R

(,

, )

T

( PRAP) EIA

M

R

70%

A

/MB

R

G

R

N. 30/NQTW (2014)

P P S CFM

P

R

;

C

N

93KW , .. KW6 Q N, , CFM, , , 5Y ; F C F

M V W S, J 2011, KW6, IUCN, RECOFTC .94

SUFs generally have three zonations: the strict protection zone (core zone) which holds the best quality forest andbiodiversity, and administrative area of variable size and forest quality and an ecological rehabilitation zone whereplanting of native species can be made.


65/92

65

15 B

15.1D E .

.

F F P D 2011 2020,

95

, S

.

E

REDD+. I , GIZMARD 2010 17

96

. T

PFES . T

.

F GIZMARD , V ( R) 97

. T

R

. A , R

.

F, V

98

. S

REDD+

. I , UNREDD

P, N D O (SNV)

. T REDD+

, , REDD+ . T

REDD+ .

T V

PM :

B N REDD+ F REDD+ . F M F.

P F P D F(FPDF), .

95F F P C FPD 147, 661 (

) 30 P (50)

; , 100,000 VND ; ,

P 30 .96

V M A R D (MARD), UNREDD GTZ, (2010) D REDDC

B D S V N.97

P M, T., P V, K., E, A., N T, T., N T, B.S. (2012) A P E R

REDD+ B D D L D, L D P, V, UNREDD P, V. A ;

://..////.98

E, A., MN, R. S, T. (2012). A REDD+ B D S:

L V. SNV N D O. A :

://..//// S, T., E, A., N T, T., N V, Q., V V, M.(2012) P L D M D REDD+ C B, UNREDD P, V

://..////


66/92

66

T P / PRAP.

B . T REDD+

. T

, . S

V

/.

15.2 L E .

5.3

. , ,

.

A ER P S 5.3, :

S : B . P

, , , .

. A

.

I : H, ( )

(.. ). O

REDD+ . S

.

S : (.. ) .

R : W ,

,

( ). R REDD+ ,

.

S B ,

. C

.

T REDD+ ,

, .

T PRAP ( 5.3) REDD+

, ,

. T

, ,

.


67/92

67

A P

MRV .

15.3

,

.

T B D S (BDS) NRAP , ,

( ) ,

. T

UNREDD+ 1 99

22

:

E ;

B FPIC ;

T ;

M ;

I ;

G ;

R REDD+ REDD+ ;

C FM .

T NRAP, BDS ,

, UNREDD P , (,

, ) , (

) ,

.

F ER P

, NRAP. T

ER P ,

. F , ,

/ , (.. ).

S

, ,

.

a) The PFES example and progress

B D 99, D 380 C 80

, (, ,

, , .). F

99C S D R E D F D (REDD+)

C B D S (BDS) V N O 2012.


68/92

68

. H, (USD

1//; , S L USD 1500//100

.

W PFES ,

, V 2005 C C

, ,

. T (.., , ) PFES.

16.C B

16.1 E

, ,

;

.

A P NRAP, ER P NRAP

101, : N FD S

102; P F E S (PFES); N B S

A P103

; N A P G G104

.

T P, S 5, C

F ( )

N C AE R. T ( )

,

: 1) ( S 13);

( S 13);

( S 15).

I ESMF NRAP, PRAP NRAP ER P

. T

(NCB) ( ) PRAP :

S NCB ;

P PIAM PPRAP ( S 13)

T ER P NCB:

() I ;

100P V: F ; O P 93; CIFOR2013.

101R ,

, , ,

,

.102

T , , , 16.24M ;

47% 2020;

; , ,

, ,

.103

I NRAP;

NRAP; REDD+;

NRAP .104F (REDD+),

.


69/92

69

() S ;() B ;() C ; () P

ER P , , NCB. I,

NCB, ( ), . T 16.1 NCB, , , ER P

.

T ,

NCB ER P, NCB

( ; , .) .


70/92


71/92

FCPF Carbon Fund ER-PIN Template v.4August, 2013

71

16.2 D

.

T ER P, FCPF C

F, UNFCCC , V REDD+ P,

, ,

, FCPF C F, W B , B F. W V, C P

, ,

.

a) Sustainable landscape approaches

U ,

V C H, N C AE R

(S 5.1). C, ,

()

. P PRAP,

, NCB, , REDD+ .

A NRAP

ER P . I , N

C

, , ,

. T (T H N A)

,

. T

FCPF C F .

b) Integrating strategies for climate change adaptation and mitigation

V (UNDP, 2012). U

, ,

. V

,

.

c) Comprehensive Approaches to Forest Monitoring

I : () ; ()

; () NCB . P (PFM)

ER P NRAP. F , ,

: ;

; / . PFM,

V,

ER P P

PRAP. NCB ( ; , NTFP;

; .), PRAP

.

d) Country-led safeguard systems

O CSS : () PLR;

() NCB ; () NCB

. T CSS, NRAP,

SESAESMF , ( UNREDD P II


72/92


72

P). T ER P

. S

PLR . I

, PRAP ,

, , NRAP

/ .

17.

17.1

+

, +

(.., + ).

I REDD+ ,

FCPF .

T ER P REDD+

VNFOREST.

T ER P .

18.List of acronyms used in the ER-PIN . A .

A

ADB A D B

BCEF B

BDS B

CF C FCFM C F M

CFM C F M

CPC C P C

CSIRO C S I R O

CSO C

EIA E I A

ER E

ERDP E R P D

ERL E

ERPA E R P A

EZ E Z

FCPF F C P FFIPI F

FLA F L A

FLEGT F L E G T

FMS F

FPD F P D VNFOREST P, D

FPDS F P D F ( PFES VNFF)

FPIC F

FRL F

FSC F S C

FSDP F S D P

FSIV F S I V

GEF G E F

GIZ G

GV G V


73/92


73

A

GRM G R M

GSO G D S O V,

HCMC H C M C

HEP H

HH H

IPCC I

JICA J I D OKW G D B

LEDP L

LEDP L

LMS L

MARD M A R D

MOLISA M L

MONRE M N R E

MPI M I P

MRV M

M M

MW M W

NCAR N ( V TH, N A, H T,

Q B, Q T, T T H )

NFI&S N F I

NFIMAP N F I, M A P

NGO N

NRAP N REDD+ A P

NTFP N

ODA O D A

OP O P ( ) W B

PA P ( SUF S U F V)

PFES P F E S

PRAP P REDD+ A PRPP R

RECOFTC T C P F

REL R E L

SEDP S (5)

SFC S

SFE S F E

SFM S F M

SNV N D O

SUF S U F ( )

TA T A

TFF T F F

TOR T RTT H T T H P

VCF V C F

VFD V F D P

VHLSS V H L S S 2012

VNFF F P D F V

VNF V F A

VPA V

VRO V REDD O

WB W B


74/92


75/92


76/92


76

Annex 2: Agro-climatic conditions of North Central Costal Region

North Central Coast has a total natural land area of approximately 5.1 million ha, of which 80% is hillsand mountains and the remaining is coastal plains with agricultural land, accounting for 14% of thenatural area. The region has a tropical monsoonal climate. Average rainfall is about 2500 mm with twoseasons a year: the rainy season from June to December with storms and hurricanes and 85% of the

rainfalls concentrating during September to November and the dry season from January to May. Theregion had a population density of about 200 persons per km2 and the population was around 10million in 2001 (13% of the countrys population). During 1995-2000, the regions GDP growth wasaround 5.3% per year (76% of the national average). The region has a low level of socio-economicconditions and high poverty rate. The annual income per capita in the region remains low (around$190), about 65% of the countrys average.

The North Central Coasts are characterized by diverse natural conditions with mountainous conditionsin the West and coastal conditions in the East. In recent years, in addition to development of seaportsand coastal tourism, marine and coastal aquaculture also has developed quite strongly.

The natural conditions of the Central Coast regions vary greatly from lowlands in coastal areas in theEast to midlands and high lands in mountainous areas in the West. The coastal plains are suitable for

annual crops, depending on the availability of freshwater. The mountainous areas are of poor soilfertility due to high water run- off continuously removing soil nutrients. Most coastal areas tend todevelop marine and coastal aquaculture and industries, while in the uplands, ethnic minorities mainlyrely on sloping agriculture and forestry.

Due to limited land availability for agriculture, industry (i.e. oil refinery, sea ports) and tourism havebeen developed for alternative incomes leading to the region becoming the main tourist destination ofthe country.

The main constraint to agricultural development includes limited agricultural land availability forcrops, poor soil fertility, poor infrastructure and shortage of freshwater in the dry season. The regionsare also prone to annual typhoons and flooding. In addition, environmental degradation due todeforestation and unsuitable farming on sloping land in the western mountain areas is a long-term

concern.

Table 2.1 Potential agricultural development actions for the region105

105Agricultural Diversification Study WB

Constraints Recommended actions Investment strategy

Main constrains prone totyphoons and flooding incoastal areas and sloping (oftensteeply) in the west inmountainous areas.

1. Supporting the private sector indeveloping upstream and downstreamenterprises (i.e. input supplies,processing, marketing and exporting)to generate more rural employment.

2. Focusing on improving productquality and quality control.

3. Linking research and extensionprograms with regional universitiesand research centers to develop strongagricultural support service systems,e.g. advice on Timber and Typhoons

4. Implementing reforestation in themountainous areas in the West andcoastal zone management in the East

Rural industries andtourism AgriculturaldiversificationAquaculture, fisheries andlivestock

Agricultural supportservices

Market development

Protection forestry.

Coastal zone management


77/92


77

I

T ,

FSDP WB 2009

5,720 ( 20 % )

1,100 ( 4 %) . T

. I

. D

T 2.2 .

2.2 (2009 )

H

A

Damaged area

( )

TotalLess than 40%

damage

Between

40-80%

damage

Between

80-100%

damage

Socio economic data

Table 2.3 Administrative centres in the program area

C

T H 1 2 24 505N A 1 2 17 435

H T 1 2 10 235

Q B 1 0 6 141

Q T 1 1 8 117

T T H 1 2 6 105

T 6 9 71 1,538

Annex 3: Supporting information on drivers of deforestation and forest degradation

The region has been investing in developing economic zones, the larger one are listed below by

vietnam er-pin may 26

Documents