virtual communities of practice: enabling peer-based distance learning
DESCRIPTION
I presented on the subject of Virtual Communities of Practice: Enabling Peer-based Distance Learning at the Canadian Association for Distance Education (CADE) conference in Vancouver, British Columbia.Presentation SummaryVirtual communities of practice are environments in which individuals with similar interests can learn from one another at a distance. Learners in this case are not limited to their local peers but are able to interact and learn from those who have similar experiences elsewhere. This type of virtual community requires design and planning in order to ensure that communication flows between its participants.Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002) define a community of practice as "groups of people who share a concern, a set of problems or a passion about a topic, and who deepen their knowledge and expertise in this area by interacting on an ongoing basis".TRANSCRIPT
Virtual Virtual Communities of Communities of
Practice: Enabling Practice: Enabling ggPeerPeer--based based
Distance LearningDistance Learninggg
Kristina SchneiderCentre for Instructional
TechnologygyJohn Molson School of Business
Concordia UniversityCADE/ACÉDCADE/ACÉD
May 2005
Presentation ObjectivesPresentation Objectivesjj
To get educational practionners:g pto recognize the advantages of supporting peer-based learning activities through distance learning with a virtual community of practiceto prepare a list of considerations when doing a needs analysis for a virtual community of practiceto outline a list of requirements when designing, d l i i l ti d l ti i t ldeveloping, implementing and evaluating a virtual community of practice
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
Distance learning with a virtual community of g ypracticeVirtual communities initiated by JMSBVirtual communities initiated by JMSBNeeds analysis for a virtual community of practicepracticeVirtual community of practice designDrafting a virtual community of practice blueprint
DistanceDistanceDistance Distance Learning with a Learning with a
VirtualVirtualVirtual Virtual Community of Community of
P tiP tiPracticePractice
Recognizing the advantages of supporting
peer-based learning activities
Defining a Community of Practice Defining a Community of Practice g yg y
Communities of practice are “groups of people who share a concern, a set of problems or a passion about a topicpassion about a topic, and who deepen their knowledge and expertise g pin this area by interacting on an ongoing basis”.
Source: Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002), “Cultivating Communities of Practice”
More then a Community of LearnersMore then a Community of Learnersyy
“More than a ‘community of learners’, a community of practice is also a ‘ it th t l ’‘community that learns’. Not merely peers exchanging ideas aroundexchanging ideas around the water cooler, sharing and benefiting from each other's expertise, but colleagues committed to jointly develop betterjointly develop better practices.”
Source: George Pór, Community Intelligence Labs
Distinctive TraitsDistinctive Traits
P M b B d i I i D iPurpose Members Boundaries Incentive Duration
Community of practice
Create, expand & exchange knowledge
Self-selected based on expertise or
Fuzzy Passion for the domainIdentification with
Evolve & end organically
Develop individual capabilities
passion group & expertise
Formal departments
Deliver a product or service
Those who report to the manager
Clear Job requirement & common goals
Intended to be
tpermanent
Operational Teams
Ongoing process Those assigned by management
Clear Shared responsibility
Indented to be ongoing
Project Teams Task oriented Those who have a Clear Project goals & PredetermineProject Teams Task oriented Those who have a direct role
Clear Project goals & milestones
Predetermined ending
Communities of Interest
Inform Those interested Fuzzy Access to information
Evolve & end organically
Informal Networks
Distribute information
Friends & business acquaintances
Undefined Mutual need & relationships
Need based
Source: Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002), “Cultivating Communities of Practice”
Defining a Virtual Community of PracticeDefining a Virtual Community of Practiceg yg y
Environments in which individuals with similar interests interact with one another at a distance. Most often used with global or distributedMost often used with global or distributed communities of practiceMain advantages:Main advantages:
Not limited to their local peers/expertiseH th t ti l t b i l iHas the potential to be more inclusiveGain a global perspectiveG i d t t l/ i ti l tiGain a cross departmental/organisational perspective
Challenges of Virtual CommunitiesChallenges of Virtual Communitiesgg
Connecting across borders and time zonesgRequiring local chapters because of potentially larger membershipgManaging the goals and priorities which are likely to differ significantly Overcoming the obstacles with knowledge sharing and intellectual propertyRecognizing that cultural differences can lead to communication difficultiesEmploying the proper technology to support such a community
Vi t lVi t lVirtual Virtual Communities Communities Initiated by Initiated by
JMSBJMSBJMSBJMSB
Networking the International Aviation
Industry
John Molson School of Business (JMSB)John Molson School of Business (JMSB)( )( )
Is the business faculty of Concordia Universityy yIs the largest English speaking business school in Canadain CanadaHas an enrolment of 6,000 studentsH t di i li hHas a strong disciplinary researchHas a strong links to industryHas dedicated educational technologists that design & development of distance education g penvironments
JMSB Distance Education ModelJMSB Distance Education Model
Objective jEnabling industry professionals and managers to remain on the job while earning their degree or professional training
Solution Researching distance education literature and modelsTaking advantage of state-of-the-art communications g gand educational technologyEstablishing communities of practice to permit industry professionals to make meaningful links between theory and practice.
VCoP: Context of ApplicationVCoP: Context of Applicationpppp
Graduate level classesProfessional training programsAlumni communitiesAlumni communities
Regardless of level of experienceRegardless of level of experience, most learners have gathered a certain amount of knowledge about their field of study and practicetheir field of study and practice.
VCoP: Method of ApplicationVCoP: Method of Applicationpppp
Professors act as facilitators for students’ learning:
Enabling them to make links between research and gpracticeEncouraging learners to teach one anotherg gNot only do they benefit from each other's expertise, but they can also develop improved practices and processes together
VCoP: Considerations for ApplicationVCoP: Considerations for Applicationpppp
Virtual communities of practice as part of an p pinstructional plan:
Pedagogically must be structured to be aligned with g g y glearning objectivesFormal structures must be put into place to allow for p pthis kind of learningCommunication tools must be distributed and mastered by learners and facilitators in order to ensure that interaction occursTh h t h l t b bl t tThe chosen technology must be able to capture conversations and exchanges
Managing Learning and a CareerManaging Learning and a Careerg g gg g g
“What I like about the I t ti l A i ti MBAInternational Aviation MBA Program is its applicability to real-life situations. I was able to implement whatever I learned in the IAMBA Global Executive Program to my daily g y ywork effectively and with impressive results.”
Haile BelaiClass of 2004Chief, Universal Safety Oversight Audit Section, ICAO
Global Aviation MBA ProgramGlobal Aviation MBA Programgg
Format adopted: 4 semesters (2 years)Initial offering: October 2000Since then 3 classes h d t d d 1 i Distance
Educationhave graduated and 1 is in progressGAMBA Alumni are in the 2 Week
SessionGAMBA Alumni are in the process of developing a community of practice
2 Week Session
community of practice
2 Week Session
2 Week Session
GAMBA Students GAMBA Students -- Countries of OriginCountries of Origingg
I l dI l d
CanadaCanadaFranceFrance
EstoniaEstoniaIrelandIrelandLatviaLatvia
GermanyGermany
SwedenSweden
EnglandEngland
IcelandIcelandRussiaRussia
SwitzerlandSwitzerland
RomaniaRomania
USAUSAFranceFrance
ChinaChinaJapanJapan
Hong KongHong Kong
SwitzerlandSwitzerlandBosniaBosniaItalyItaly
U.A.EU.A.E
TrinidadTrinidadEcuadorEcuador
GhanaGhanaIndiaIndia
Hong KongHong Kong
SingaporeSingapore
GambiaGambia
MauritiusMauritiusSouth South AfricaAfrica
New New ZealandZealand
Recent Distance Education ProjectsRecent Distance Education Projectsjj
Development of Aviation Development of Airport Security Management program in partnership
ith ICAO
Executive Leadership Program in partnership
ith ACIwith ICAO with ACI
VCoP in the mandate
These programs are further enriched by the formation of a community of practice that continues well beyond the
initial course delivery.
Professional Link to Aviation IndustryProfessional Link to Aviation Industryyy
A competitive advantage in a growing industryUnique learning environment, international and professionalM th 70 li tMore than 70 client organizations from around the worldaround the worldIntegrated industry focus through formal andthrough formal and ongoing consultations and partnerships with…
N d A l iN d A l iNeeds Analysis Needs Analysis For a Virtual For a Virtual
Community of Community of PracticePracticePracticePractice
Preparing a list of considerations
Is a VCoP the Correct Strategy?Is a VCoP the Correct Strategy?gygy
Considerations Fit with VCoPLearners work in industry and/or have prior knowledge about subject matterLearners are dispersed geographically or h h d l th t d t it th thave schedules that do not permit them to meet face to faceAn instructional objective is to promote lifeAn instructional objective is to promote life long learningAn program objective is to promote virtualAn program objective is to promote virtual team work
Attributes of A VCoPAttributes of A VCoP
SizeLife spanPhysical boundaries, such as:y
Collocated or distributedHomogenous or heterogeneousInside and across boundaries, such as:
Within businessAcross business unitsAcross business unitsAcross organizational boundaries
FormalityFormalitySpontaneous or intentionalUnrecognized to institutionalizedUnrecognized to institutionalized
Source: Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002), “Cultivating Communities of Practice”
Structural Elements of a VCoPStructural Elements of a VCoP
Domain, which:Legitimizes the community Defines boundaries
Community, which:Provides an environment for people to interact, share and learn Enables relationship buildingEnables relationship building
Practice, which:Encompasses the shared knowledge assets of the communityEncompasses the shared knowledge assets of the community, such as:
Framework Ideas Tools Information Styles Language Stories Documents
Source: Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002), “Cultivating Communities of Practice”
Virtual Virtual Community ofCommunity ofCommunity of Community of
Practice DesignPractice Design
Outlining a list of requirements
Stages of Community DevelopmentStages of Community Developmentg y pg y pThe jagged line represents the level of energy and visibility that the community typically generates over time.y yp y g
Levels of Energyand Visibility
Stewardship
Coalescing
Maturing
Transformation
Planning and Launching
Communities of Practice
Potential
Transformation
TimeDevelopmentalTensions
Discover/Imagine
Incubate/DeliverImmediate Value
Focus/Expand
Ownership/Openness
Let Go/Live On
Source: Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002), “Cultivating Communities of Practice”
PotentialPotential
At this stage:Informal network of learners with differing experiences but with
Structural Elements Key Issues
Domain To define the scope of domainexperiences but with
similar issues and needsLearners need to discover
d d
scope of domain of interest to the members as well as being aligned t thcommon ground and
discover each others’ strengths
to the organisation.
Community To discover extant social net ork thatsocial network that engages in that topic.
Practice To identify the common knowledge needs.
CoalescingCoalescinggg
At this stage:Learners start to find value in engaging in learning activities and design a
Structural Elements Key Issues
Domain To establish the value of sharingactivities and design a
communityvalue of sharing domain knowledge.
C it T d lCommunity To develop sufficient trust to discuss practice problems.problems.
Practice To discover what knowledge should b h d dbe shared and how.
Metaphor for DesignMetaphor for Designp gp g
Wenger, McDermott and Snyder offer an analogy of growing a plant, which i f l iis a useful one in conveying the organic process in cultivatingprocess in cultivating communities of practice
Source: Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002), “Cultivating Communities of Practice”
Designing with Goals in MindDesigning with Goals in Mindg gg g
Explicit design principles: Networking and shows the relationships between elementsmakes it possible to be
knowledge sharingTeam building and
makes it possible to be more flexible and improvisational
distributed virtual work teams processesTh ti l f k fTheoretical framework for efficient problem-solving for company/industryC t l for company/industry problems and opportunities
Conceptual
P ti lPractical
Steps for Designing a VCoPSteps for Designing a VCoPp g gp g g
1. Design for evolution g2. Open a dialogue between inside and outside
perspectivesperspectives 3. Invite different levels of participation 4 D l b th bli d i t it4. Develop both public and private community
spaces 5. Focus on value 6. Combine familiarity and excitement y7. Create a rhythm for the community
Source: Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002), “Cultivating Communities of Practice”
Design for EvolutionDesign for Evolutiongg
Characteristics Design RequirementsOrganicEvolve naturallyDynamic by nature
Steering rather the (re)creatingShould be catalysts for a community's natural evolutionDynamic by nature
Build on existing connectionsNew membership may shift
community s natural evolutionResembling life-long learning strategiesp y
focusReflect on and redesign elements of themselves
Fewer elements at the beginning and focus on recruiting potential memberselements of themselves
throughout their existence
g pShould introduce new practices and elements graduallygradually
Source: Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002), “Cultivating Communities of Practice”
Open a Dialogue for Multiple PerspectivesOpen a Dialogue for Multiple Perspectivesp g p pp g p p
CharacteristicsI id i
Design requirementsA i id ' i l dInsider appreciate:
The issues at the heart of the domain
An insider's perspective to lead the discovery of what the community is about
The shared knowledgeThe challenges their field faces
Built on the collective experience of community members
The potential in emerging ideas and techniques
Insiders can identify the real l d th i
Channels to bring information from outside the community into the dialogue about what
players are and their relationshipsInsiders can understand of
the community could achieveTools to educates community members about the role of
community issuesOutsiders can help members see the possibilities
communities
Source: Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002), “Cultivating Communities of Practice”
Invite Different Levels of ParticipationInvite Different Levels of Participationpp
Characteristics Design RequirementsIt is unrealistic encourage all community members to participate equally
Many levels of participation A "coordinator" A healthy degree of movementp p q y
Three main levels of community participation:
Th h t f th it
A healthy degree of movement between levelsParticipants at all levels to feel
The heart of the communityThe active groupThe peripheral group
like full membersCreate opportunities for active members to take limited
Outsiders who have an interest in the community
members to take limited leadership rolesDraw members into more
ti ti i tiactive participationCommunity members move through these levels because the boundaries of a community are fluid.
Source: Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002), “Cultivating Communities of Practice”
Develop Public and Private SpacesDevelop Public and Private Spacesp pp p
Characteristics Design RequirementsRich with connections that happen both in:
The public places
Public events:Members experience being part of the communityThe public places
The private spaces, which helps strengthen relationships amongst members
p ySee who participatesGain a better appreciation overallamongst members.
The public and private dimensions of a community are i t l t d
overallPrivate spaces:
Assess the needs of interrelatedParticipants often have multiple agendas:
community members Good communities orchestrate activities in both public and p g
Completing a group taskFinding help
pprivate spaces
Source: Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002), “Cultivating Communities of Practice”
Focus on ValueFocus on Value
CharacteristicsV l i k i lif
Design RequirementsSh ld d l iValue is key to community life
Full value is often not apparent at first
Should develop a systematic and fully accessible body of knowledge
Source of value often changes over the life of the communityEarly value often comes from
Should promote events, activities, and relationships that help their value emerge
d bl b tEarly value often comes from focusing on the current problems and needs
and enable members to discover ways to harvest itShould trace the impact of a shared idea which takes time and attentionShould encourage community
Many of the most valuable community activities are the small, g y
members to be explicit about the value of the community throughout its lifetime
activities are the small, everyday interactions.
Source: Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002), “Cultivating Communities of Practice”
Combine Familiarity and ExcitementCombine Familiarity and Excitementyy
Characteristics Design RequirementsSuccessful communities offer:
Should combine both familiar and exciting
Familiarity, which creates a comfort level, which in turn invites candid discussions
events:Routine activities provide the stability for relationship-invites candid discussions
Excitement, which enables divergent thinking and activity which in turn
the stability for relationship-building connectionsExciting events provide a
factivity, which in turn complements familiarity
sense of common adventure.
Source: Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002), “Cultivating Communities of Practice”
Create a Rhythm for the CommunityCreate a Rhythm for the Communityy yy y
CharacteristicsThe rhythm is the strongest
Design RequirementsShould combine wholeThe rhythm is the strongest
indicator of its alivenesstoo fast: feels breathlesstoo slow: feels sluggish
Should combine whole-community and small-group gatherings
To create a balance betweentoo slow: feels sluggishThe tempo is influenced by the rhythmThere are many rhythms in a
To create a balance between the thrill of exposure to many different ideasTo permit the comfort of more intimate relationshipsThere are many rhythms in a
community:The syncopation of familiar and exciting events
intimate relationshipsShould have a mix of idea-sharing forums and tool-building projects
The frequency of private interactionsThe ebb and flow from the sidelines into active
building projectsTo foster casual connections To promote directed community actionsidelines into active
participationThe pace of the community's overall evolution
Source: Wenger, McDermott and Snyder (2002), “Cultivating Communities of Practice”
Considerations for VCoPsConsiderations for VCoPs
Because VCoPs most often serve distributed communities, additional efforts in 4 development activities are required:q
Achieving stakeholder alignmentCreating a local/global structureCreating a local/global structureBuilding a strong rhythm to maintain visibilityDevelop the private spaces more systematicallyDevelop the private spaces more systematically
VCoP Local/Global StructureVCoP Local/Global Structure
Large local
Localcoordinator
group
Small local
Regionalgroup
Small localgroup
Globalcoordinator
Designing a di t ib t d
Small localgroup
distributed community with a fractal approach
Source: McDermott and Jackson (2000), “Designing Global Communities”
Drafting aDrafting aDrafting a Drafting a Virtual Virtual
Community ofCommunity ofCommunity of Community of Practice Practice Bl i tBl i tBlueprint Blueprint
An Exercise
Thank youThank youyy
Question & comments