virtues of polarization in remote sensing of atmospheres and oceans
DESCRIPTION
Virtues of polarization in remote sensing of atmospheres and oceans. George W. Kattawar Department of Physics and Institute for Quantum Studies Texas A&M University Research Colleagues: Deric Gray, Ping Yang, Yu You, Peng-Wang Zhai, Zhibo Zhang. Scattering object. Incident beam. . - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Virtues of polarization in remote sensing of atmospheres
and oceans
George W. KattawarDepartment of Physics and Institute
for Quantum StudiesTexas A&M University
Research Colleagues:Deric Gray, Ping Yang, Yu You, Peng-Wang Zhai, Zhibo Zhang
Scattering plane
Scattering Geometry
Incident beam
E⊥i
EP
i
Scattering angle
EP
s
E⊥s
Scattering object
Scattering amplitude matrix
EPs
E⊥s
⎛
⎝
⎜⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟⎟=
eikr
−ikr
S2 S3
S4 S1
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
EPi
E⊥i
⎛
⎝
⎜⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟⎟
||
||
|| ||
Stokes vector-Mueller matrix formulation
The electric field can be resolved into components. El and Er are complex oscillatory functions.
E = El l + Er r
The four component Stokes vector can now be defined.
They are all real numbers and satisfy the relation
I2 = Q2 + U2 + V2
I =ElEl∗+ ErEr
∗=I l + Ir
Q =ElEl∗−ErEr
∗=I l −Ir
U =ElEr∗+ ErEl
∗
V =i (ElEr∗−ErEl
∗)
Is
Qs
Us
Vs
⎛
⎝
⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟
=
M11 M12 M13 M14M21 M22 M23 M24M31 M32 M33 M34M41 M42 M43 M44
⎛
⎝
⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟
Ii
Qi
Ui
V i
⎛
⎝
⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟
The Mueller matrix relates the incident and scattered Stokes vectors
Stokes vector and polarization parameters
I is the radiance (this is what the human eye sees)
Q is the amount of radiation that is polarized in the 0/90 orientationU is the amount of radiation polarized in the +/-450 orientationV is the amount of radiation that is right or left circularly polarizedDOP= Degree of polarization=
Q2 + U2 + V2 / I
DOLP = Degree of linear polarization =
Q2 + U2 / I
DOCP = Degree of circular polarization = |V|/I
Orientation of plane of polarization = tan-1(U/Q)
Ellipticity= Ratio of semiminor to semimajor axis of polarization ellipse=b/a
=tan[(sin-1(V/I))/2]
Polarizer and analyzer settings for Mueller matrix measurements
S
11
S
12
S
13
S
14
S
21
S
22
S
23
S
24
S
31
S
32
S
33
S
34
S
41
(OO) (HO-VO) (PO-MO) (LO-RO)
(OH-OV)(HH-VV) -
(HV+VH)
(PH-MV) -
(PV+MH)
(LH-RV) -
(LV+RH)
(OP-OM) (HP-VM) -
(HM+VP)
(PP-MM) -
(PM+MP)
(LP-RM) -
(LM+RP)
(OL-OR)
S
42
(HL-VR) -
(HR+VL)
S
43
(PL-MR) -
(PR+ML)
S
44
(LL-RR) -
(RL+LR)
Diagram showing the input polarization (first symbol) and output analyzer orientation (second symbol) to determine each element of the SSMM denoted by Sij. For example, HV denotes horizontal input polarized light and a vertical polarization analyzer. The corresponding symbols denoting polarization are V, vertical; H, horizontal; P, +45, M, -45; R, right handed circular polarization; L, left handed circular polarization; and O, open or no polarization optics. This set of measurements was first deduced by Bickel and Bailey.
Plankton as viewed by a squid
Planktonic animal as seen through "regular" visionAs seen when placed between two crossed linear polarizing filters
As seen by putting the two polarizers at 45° to each other
Contrast enhancement using polarization
Photo taken with a flash lamp and no polarization optics
Photo taken with circular polarized light for illumination and a circular analyzer for viewing
Nissan car viewed in mid-wave infrared
This data was collected using an Amber MWIR InSb imaging array 256x256. The polarization optics consisted of a rotating quarter wave plate and a linear polarizer. Images were taken at eight different positions of the quarter wave plate (22.5 degree increments) over 180 degrees. The data was reduced to the full Stokes vector using a Fourier transform data reduction technique.
I Q U V
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Bacillus anthracis
Experimental Setup
Yong-Le Pan, Kevin B. Aptowicz, Richard K. Chang, Matt Hart, and Jay D. Eversole,Characterizing and monitoring respiratory aerosols by light scattering, Optics Letters,Vol. 28, No. 8, p589 (2003).
Coordinate Setup
z
x
y
Laserbeam
€
ˆ x × ˆ y = ˆ z
source
z
x
ydetector
Z’
The symmetry axis is in the yz plane.
Mueller Image Generating Method
€
r =180 −θ,θ ∈ 90,180( ]
We plot the reduced mueller matrix elements on a circular plane shown as in the figure below. Reduced mueller matrix means all mueller elements except M11 are normalized to M11, which are in the range from -1 to +1. For the M11 element, we use the phase matrix P11 value.
M(,)
r
x
y
90
90
-90
-90
In our mueller image generation, radial position has linear relation to the scattering polar angle. The actual experimental detection may not have same relation. The resultant images will be different than the images shown here.
Particle Model-1: SporeOuter coat
Inner coat
Cortex Core
1.0m
0.8m
=0.5m
Philip J. Wyatt, “Differential Light Scattering: a Physical Method for Identifying Living Bacterial Cells”, Applied Optics, Vol.7,No. 10,1879 (1968)
Simulation Models
(a) (b) (c) (d)
1.0μm
0.8μm
1.0 or 2.0 μm
0.5 μm
m=1.34 m=1.34
Homogenous Spore Mueller Image = 0o
m=1.34 1.0m
0.8 m
=0.5m
Spore with Core Mueller Image = 0o
Core 1.0m
0.8 m
=0.5m
Homogenous Cylinder Mueller Image height=1m, =0o
m=1.35
1.0m
0.5m
= 0.532 m
Homogenous Cylinder Mueller Image height = 2m, = 0o
0.5m
= 0.532 m
m=1.35
2.0m
Mueller Image for Three Particles =90o
m=1.34 1.0m
0.8 m
=0.5m
1.0m
0.8 m
0.5m = 0.532 mm=1.35
1.0m
P11 P33 P34 P44
Properties of the TargetThe target reflects light with a Lambertian distribution. The albedo is constant across surface, but each annular region has a different reduced Mueller matrix.R = 0.033
R = 0.067
R = 0.10 m.f.p.s
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
2. Depolarizing
1. Polarization Preserving
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
3. Painted Surface1 0 0 0
0 0.61 0 0
0 0 0.58 0
0 0 0 0.51
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦
Geometry of the Imaging System
Target Depth
Target
Incident Beam
Detector field ofview
Detectorresolution
Detector
Medium
Properties of the Model The attenuation coefficient is fixed, but the
absorption and scattering coefficients can be varied. All distances are given in units of photon mean free path (m.f.p.)
The system is assumed to be an active source, so there is full control over all aspects of both source and detector.
The detector details are intentionally left out; only the radiometric quantities at the detector location are calculated.
The problem is solved for a time-independent case.
Inherent Optical Properties of the Medium
Two classes of phase functions are used to describe the scattering by the medium:
Henyey-Greenstein (HG):
Two-Term Henyey-Greenstein (TTH):
2
322
11, ;4
1 2HG
gg
g g
β π
⎛ ⎞⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
⎛ ⎞⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
−=− +
% cosg
= Θ=
1 2 1 2( , ; , ) ( , ; ) (1 ) ( , ; )TTH HG HGg g g gβ αβ α β = + −% % %
0 1α≤ ≤
The single-scatter reduced Mueller matrix for ocean water is taken to be that of Rayleigh scattering:
2
2 2
1 ( ) 0 0( ) 1 0 0M( )0 0 ( ) 00 0 0 ( )
cos 1 2cos( ) ( )cos 1 cos 1
bb
dd
b d
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
ΘΘΘ =
ΘΘ
Θ− ΘΘ = Θ =Θ+ Θ+
%
Results
The target depth is kept constant at 2 m.f.p.s
The target albedo is kept constant with a value of 0.025
The effective Mueller matrix elements of the system are calculated for different phase functions and single scatter albedos of the medium.
Due to the form of the matrix elements of the target and the backscattering geometry of the imaging system, only the diagonal elements of the effective Mueller matrix are non-zero.
Mueller Matrix ElementsHG g=0.95 phase function Medium Albedo =
0.25
11m
22m%
33m% 44
m%
RadianceHG g=0.5
= 0.5 = 0.25
HG g=0.8 HG g=0.95
= 0.5 = 0.25
= 0.25
= 0.5
= 0.5 = 0.25
= 0.25
= 0.5
TTH SBP TTH LBP
%M22
HG g=0.5
= 0.5 = 0.25
HG g=0.8 HG g=0.95
= 0.5 = 0.25
= 0.25
= 0.5
= 0.5 = 0.25
= 0.25
= 0.5
TTH SBP TTH LBP
%M
33
HG g=0.5
= 0.5 = 0.25
HG g=0.8 HG g=0.95
= 0.5 = 0.25
= 0.25
= 0.5
= 0.5 = 0.25
= 0.25
= 0.5
TTH SBP TTH LBP
%M
44
HG g=0.5
= 0.5 = 0.25
HG g=0.8 HG g=0.95
= 0.5 = 0.25
= 0.25
= 0.5
= 0.5 = 0.25
= 0.25
= 0.5
TTH SBP TTH LBP
Mueller Matrix ElementsMedium Albedo = 0.25
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.40.000
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004Radiance
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.40.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4Radial Distance from Target Center (m.f.p.)
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2HG g=0.95HG g=0.8HG g=0.5TTH LBPTTH SBP
%M22
%M33 %M44
%M22
%M33
%M44
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.40.000
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
Radiance
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.40.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4Radial Distance from Target Center (m.f.p.)
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2HG g=0.95HG g=0.8HG g=0.5TTH LBPTTH SBP
%M22
%M33 %M44
Mueller Matrix ElementsMedium Albedo = 0.5
%M22
%M33
%M44
Conclusions
• Only correct way to do radiative transfer calculations• Mueller matrix contains all the elastic scattering information one can obtain from either a single particle or an ensemble of particles• Provides a unique “fingerprint” of particle morphology, orientation, and optical properties
• Can provide information about surface features of objects which can’t be obtained with ordinary radiance measurements
• Can even be used for the detection of precancerous skin lesions