vissim and mn/dot’s intersection control evaluation (ice) vissim user’s group meeting may 15-16,...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL
EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING
MAY 15-16, 2008Philadelphia
Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E.
Vice President
SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
Leif Garness, E.I.T.
Traffic Engineer
SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
![Page 2: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Presentation Overview
• What is ICE?
• Issues with ICE
• Two examples of ICE for roundabout projectsOld US 12 at Wayzata BoulevardMn Hwy 22 and Blue Earth County 90
• Lessons learnedUsing VISSIM for roundaboutsRoundabout Design
![Page 3: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ICE OVERVIEW
![Page 4: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• Creates standard analysis for Mn/DOT intersections Select geometry and traffic control early during project
development Encourage considering other forms of intersection
geometry and traffic control However, default is side street STOP control Anything else must be evaluated and “proven”
• Evaluate viable alternatives for: Safety Peak hour capacity Efficiency through all traffic levels
• Document selection reasons To avoid re-visits later in the project
ICE – Definition and Goals
![Page 5: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ICE Flow Diagram
![Page 6: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Intersection Alternatives
• Standard intersections Mn/DOT minimum for
signals• 3 lanes (L-T-R) in, 1
lane out
• Roundabouts
• One way pairs
• Offset “T’s”
• Quadrant roadways
• Michigan U (left) -turns Continuous flow or lefts in advance
• Jug handle
• Through-about
• Super street
• Reduced conflict
• Double cross-over
![Page 7: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
At-grade Intersection Alternatives
Indirect or “Michigan”
U (left) turns
No left turns
Quadrant intersection
No left turns
Patented by F. Mier
CFI
Continuous flow
intersection Jug handle Through about
![Page 8: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• Reduce alternatives early
• Evaluate alternatives quickly and efficiently by using planning-level analysis Volume to capacity (V/C) determined by critical lane Performance impacts from look-up tables
• SRF spreadsheet intersection evaluation tool
SRF – Planning Level Evaluation
![Page 9: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Traffic Volume Input Sheet
SRF Intersection Evaluation Tool
![Page 10: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Intersection Alternatives - Worksheet
Right turn bypass?
Number of lanes
Results are V/C ratios
![Page 11: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
ISSUES WITH ICE AND WARRANTS
![Page 12: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Intersections - Warrants - Issues
• Warrants - guidelines for installing traffic control devices: All-way stops Signals
• However, what are the warrants for intersection geometry? Roadway system issues
• Hierarchy of intersecting roadways• Corridor consistency• Performance goals
Costs versus needed level of control and capacity
• What if? Warrants for traffic controls are not met for 10 years But policy requires intersection design for 20 year forecasts?
![Page 13: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
• Are warrants met? Traffic signal All-way stop
• Roundabouts Warrants? – (Mn/DOT criteria only if all-way stops or signals
are warranted)
• If not, will warrants be met by design year?
• When will warrants be met?
• What is interim solution? A roundabout is an intersection traffic control device Roundabouts are built as roadways What if warrants are not met in year of opening?
Warrant Status
![Page 14: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The BIG Question
• What do you build now if a roundabout is the proper solution for the 20 year forecasts, but the roundabout “warrants” are not met?
• The answer is to then “justify” the roundaboutShow that there is no safety issueShow that there are no capacity or efficiency
issues during the interim until warrants are met
![Page 15: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• VISSIM was selected by Mn/DOT as the best tool for alternatives evaluation Obtain total travel time - from free flow in to free flow
out Queuing Delay Stops
• Evaluation of geometric features Capacity versus intersection geometry Also:
• Turn lane lengths• Downstream merge distances• Vehicle tracking• Decision distance
• Effects of higher approach speeds and vehicle mix
Controls and Travel Time
![Page 16: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
1. Lengthening of path (e.g. downstream u-turn)
2. Path geometry (e.g. slowing to use a roundabout)
3. Control device delay (e.g. STOP sign)
4. Control delay and impacts from sharing intersection with other traffic
Roundabouts – waiting to enter
Signals – waiting for green
All-way stops – waiting for turn
Side street stops – waiting for gap
5. Congestion delay to other traffic going in the same direction (e.g. queue discharge or following a truck)
Controls and Travel Time
Traffic control impacts total travel time
![Page 17: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
(1) Compared to traveling at steady speed
(2) Design speed of roundabout
(3) Includes added travel time for distance in roundabout, but not delay due to other traffic
Added Travel Time(1) Due to Major Speed Changes
• CARS
• Stop sign 35 to 0 to 35 = 14.2 secs 65 to 0 to 65 = 24.4 secs
• Roundabout - 15 mph (2) 35 to 15 to 35 = 9.1 secs 65 to 15 to 65 = 18.6 secs
• TRUCKS
• Stop sign 35 to 0 to 35 = 19.7 secs 65 to 0 to 65 = 45.0 secs
• Roundabout - 15 mph (2) 35 to 15 to 35 = 20.7 secs 65 to 15 to 65 = 46.8 secs
![Page 18: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Travel time “trap”
free flow
Collect total travel time for all vehicles from approaching at free flow speed to returning to free flow speed
![Page 19: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Project Examples
![Page 20: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Project Examples
• Old US Hwy 12 in Orono, Minnesota
• Mn Hwy 22 at Blue Earth Co Rd 90 – south east of Mankato, Minnesota
Project Location
Project Location
North
![Page 21: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Old US 12 at Wayzata Boulevard
New US 12 freeway
Construct roundabout
Close access
Add frontage roads
![Page 22: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Alternatives
![Page 23: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Old Hwy 12 - Project Issues
• Prove that a roundabout is “justified”
• Prove that it won’t back traffic onto freeway
• Document the benefits
• Determine the required design for existing conditions and for 20 years of traffic growth
![Page 24: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Old US 12 – Results – 2008 volumes
Delay Summary (2008) Type of Control
Approach Move Peak hour STOP sign Round-about
EB old TH 12 Through AM 1.3 5.4
PM 0.6 0.7
Left AM 2.3 2.2
PM 5.5 0.1
WB old TH 12 Through AM 0.4 1.0
PM 0.9 3.6
Right AM 1.4 2.7
PM 1.4 4.2
Wayzata Boulevard Right AM 7.2 0.2
PM 19.7 10.8
Left AM 32.8 1.7
PM 15.3 21.1
Montessori Right Turns onto WB old TH 12 AM 14.8 15.2
PM 55.1 27.2
![Page 25: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Delay Summary (2028) Type of Control
Approach Move Peak hour STOP sign Round-about (1.5)
EB old TH 12 Through AM 1.8 5.0
PM 0.7 1.3
Left AM 3.3 2.4
PM 13.6 1.7
WB old TH 12 Through AM 0.5 1.3
PM 1.4 4.0
Right AM 1.4 1.0
PM 1.6 2.9
Wayzata Boulevard Right AM 19.4 1.9
PM 229 36.2
Left AM 75.6 6.7
PM 192 48.2
Montessori Right Turns onto WB old TH 12 AM 22.6 17.3
PM 733 100
Old US 12 – Results – 2028 volumes
![Page 26: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Queue Lengths - pm
WB TH 12 EB TH 12
WB TH 12 EB TH 12
![Page 27: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
MN Hwy 22 at Co Rd 90 - alternatives
Signal with 3-in, 1 out geometry
Multi-lane roundabout
Single lane roundabout
![Page 28: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Hwy 22 at Co Rd 90 - Project Issues
• Evaluate roundabout versus traffic signals
• Evaluate single lane versus multi-lane roundabout
• Evaluate cost effectiveness of design features
• Document the overall benefits
• VISSIM results recommended the multi-lane design Will operate as a 1.5 roundabout with added through
lane as passing opportunity Roundabout geometry will work with future divided
roadway alignments
![Page 29: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Lessons Learned
![Page 30: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Lessons Learned - VISSIM
• Use “special" links on approaches and exits to network Constant locations for traffic inputs, routing decisions, speed
limits and beginning of travel time traps, creating alternatives that are consistent is much easier
• Consider using only a physical headway rather than time gap for roundabout entry priority rules (matches driver decision making more realistically)
• Add a further speed reduction (below curve speed) at Yield line
• Run links into the roundabout as 4 through routes, make all turns with connectors, rather than having a circular roadway
• Create short links at Yield lines with lane closures
• Use separate right turn priority rules under certain conditions
![Page 31: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
• ICE requirements require “total” travel time evaluations not just VISSIM node evaluations
• Don’t try using general speed zones for the roundabout environment, use curve speed areas
• The batch run feature works well
• Consider the connector decision distance as travel time (rather than feet) and reduce accordingly based on the lower speed environment of a roundabout, particularly if closely spaced multiple roundabouts
• Also consider the emergency stop distance (16.4 ft) is way too short for lane drops and some decision points
Lessons Learned - VISSIM
![Page 32: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Lessons Learned - VISSIM
• Vehicle tracking is useful tool (no need to keep checking in Autoturn)
• Easy to: Measure queues Assess impacts of nearby intersections Assess pedestrian impacts Demonstrate and measure the effects of geometric changes Visualize results of design decisions
• VISSIM is an effective presentation tool for elected officials
![Page 33: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Checking vehicle tracking in VISSIM
![Page 34: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Lessons Learned – Roundabout Selection and Design
• Planning – Understand roadway system issues, mobility versus access Roundabouts tend to “equalize” the network and favor access
over mobility
• A roundabout is both an intersection and a traffic control device, the issue of “warrants” is complex
• Consider all hours and volume levels of operation, not just the peaks
• Understand the range of variability of the forecasts
• Consider all modes and vehicle types that will use the roundabout
• Roundabout geometry does affect capacity and efficiency, but in ways not apparent in RODEL Use wide splitter islands
• Better gap selection• Better deflection
![Page 35: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Roundabout splitter width test
5 % more capacity5 to 7 seconds reduction in travel timesReduced truck off-tracking
![Page 36: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
However…
Roundabouts have a “cult” following in some places
Don’t be pressured
Do the math
![Page 37: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Politician, Planner or Landscape Architect
Traffic engineer
![Page 38: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
“Standard” Conflict Diagrams
X X X X
XXX
X
XXX
XX X X X
Roundabout Intersection
![Page 39: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
“True” roundabout conflict points
XX
X X
![Page 40: VISSIM and Mn/DOT’s INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION (ICE) VISSIM USER’S GROUP MEETING MAY 15-16, 2008 Philadelphia Dennis Eyler, P.E., P.T.O.E. Vice President](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56649e4b5503460f94b40731/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
The End
Questions?