viva presentation : pavement (derma nur ashikin)
DESCRIPTION
UTILISATION OF MIXED RECYCLED PLASTICS AND GLASS AS AN AGGREGATE REPLACEMENT IN ASPHALT MIXTURESTRANSCRIPT
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
UTILISATION OF MIXED RECYCLED PLASTICS AND GLASS AS AN
AGGREGATE REPLACEMENT IN ASPHALT MIXTURES
DERMA NUR ASHIKIN BT NONG RADZIF A133212
Dr. NUR IZZI BIN MD. YUSOFF
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
INTRODUCTION Malaysia produces over 23,000 tonnes
of waste dailyThis amount will increase to 30,000
tonnes by 2020 and continue to increase due to the increasing population and development, less than 5% of waste is currently recycled (Global Environment Centre Malaysia)
Glass have a much lower value than other recycled materials such as plastics, metal and paper (Chiew, 2005)
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
INTRODUCTIONPrevious study indicates that
glass and plastic waste can be used as a secondary aggregate in asphalt concrete pavement, providing better dynamic behaviour that can withstand heavy traffic in the long term (Al-Salem et al., 2009)
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
OBJECTIVES
1. To investigate the feasibility of using waste materials (glass and plastics) in asphalt mixtures for pavement applications under various conditions namely; unaged, short-term and long-term ageing
2. To model the deformation occurs in each samples using the finite-element software (Abaqus).
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
MATERIALS
Aggregate Bitumen
Lime Stone
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
MATERIALSMixed Recycled Plastics Three Types Of Recycled Glass
Mixed Recycled Plastics Bottle Glass
Sheet Glass LCD Glass
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
SAMPLE PREPARATIONS
Samples were fabricated with various percentages of added recycled materials :0%P (Plastic) 5%G (Glass) 5%P 0% G 2.5%P + 2.5%G1%P + 4%G4%P + 1%GControl sample
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
1. AGGREGATE TESTAggregate Test Method
Aggregate Crushing Value(ACV) BS 812 : Part 110 :1990
Aggregate Impact Value (AIV) BS 812 :Part 112 : 1990
Flakiness Index (FI) BS 812 :section 105.1 :1989
Elongation Index (EI) BS 812 :Part 1: 1975
Los Angeles Abrasion Value (LAAV) ASTM C: 131-81
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN2. VOLUMETRIC PROPERTIESAir Voids (VA)Voids In Mineral Aggregate (VMA)Voids Filled With Asphalt (VFA)3. Sample PreparationsBy using Superpave Gyratory
Compactor Machine
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN4. AGEING PROCEDURES• Unaged • Short-term Ageing• Long-term Ageing
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN5. PERFOMANCE TESTINGResilient Modulus (ASTM Standards :D 4123-82)Static Creep(BS 598-111:1995)Dynamic Creep(BS DD 226:1996)6. MODELLINGFinite-element software Abaqus.
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONAggregate Properties
Aggregate Test Value (%) Method
Aggregate Crushing Value (ACV) 42.57
BS 812 : Part 110 :1990
Aggregate Impact Value (AIV) 15.10
BS 812 :Part 112 : 1990
Flakiness Index (FI) 6.00BS 812 :section
105.1 :1989
Elongation Index (EI) 42.00 BS 812 :Part 1: 1975
Los Angeles Abrasion Value (LAAV) 32.13 ASTM C: 131-81
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONBinder Properties (60/70)
Test Value Unit Method
Penetration at 25 ºC 63 1/10 mm ASTM D5
Softening point 48 °C ASTM D36
Specific gravity 1.0465 - ASTM D70
Ductility at 25 ºC >100 Cm ASTM D113
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Sieve Size
Percent Passing (%)
Upper
Limit
Lower
LimitDesign
Glass
PlasticBottle LCD Sheet
19 mm 100 90 95 0 1 0 0
9.5 mm 80 56 68 0 8.96 0 0
4.75 mm 65 35 50 1.27 23.22 3.48 21.69
2.36 mm 49 23 36 37.73 26.51 29.94 75.14
300 µm 19 5 12 56.39 29.40 56.20 3.17
75 µm 8 5 5 3.54 1.37 7.56 0
Dust 0 0 0 1.07 9.54 2.82 0
The gradation of aggregates and recycled materials (ASTM D 3515-96 (D-4)
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONOptimum Binder Content
Samples Optimum Binder Content (%)
Control 4.43
5% Glass 4.78
5% Plastic 4.2
2.5% Plastic 2.5% Glass 4.2
4% Plastic 1% Glass 5.2
1% Plastic 4% Glass 5.4
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Resilient Modulus (Unaged)
0.33 Hz 0.5 Hz 1 Hz 0.33 Hz 0.5 Hz 1 Hz0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
CONTROL
5% Glass
5% Plastic
2.5% Plastic 2.5% Glass
4% Plastic 1% Glass
1% plastic 4% Glass
RESILIENT MODULUS OF UNAGED SAMPLES
25 °C 40 °C
Res
ilien
t mod
ulus
(M
pa)
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Resilient Modulus (Short-term Ageing)
0.33 Hz 0.5 Hz 1 Hz 0.33 Hz 0.5 Hz 1 Hz0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
CONTROL
5% Glass
5% Plastic
2.5% Plastic 2.5% Glass
1% plastic 4% Glass
4% Plastic 1% Glass
RESILIENT MODULUS OF SHORT TERM AGEING SAM-PLES
Res
ilien
t Mod
ulus
Mpa
25 °C 40 °C
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Resilient Modulus (Long-term Ageing)
0.33 Hz 0.5 Hz 1 Hz 0.33 Hz 0.5 Hz 1 Hz0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
CONTROL
5% Glass
5% Plastic
2.5% Plastic 2.5% Glass
1% plastic 4% Glass
4% Plastic 1% Glass
RESILIENT MODULUS OF LONG-TERM AGEING
25 °C 40 °C
Res
ilien
t Mod
ulus
(M
pa)
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONRESILIENT MODULUS INDEX (MRI) : 25 °C
RESILIENT MODULUS INDEX (25 °C)
SAMPLES UNAGED SHORT-TERM LONG-TERM
CONTROL 1 1 1
5% GLASS 1.10 1.54 1.86
5% PLASTIC 0.64 0.50 0.91
2.5% GLASS 2.5%PLASTIC 1.01 0.55 0.86
4% PLASTIC 1% GLASS 0.84 0.26 0.29
1% PLASTIC 4% GLASS 1.55 1.20 2.82
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONRESILIENT MODULUS INDEX (MRI) :
40 °C
RESILIENT MODULUS INDEX 40 °C)
SAMPLES UNAGED SHORT-TERM LONG-TERM
CONTROL 1.00 1.00 1.00
5% GLASS 1.53 0.45 1.71
5% PLASTIC 0.50 0.10 0.602.5% GLASS 2.5%PLASTIC 0.99 0.50 0.47
4% PLASTIC 1% GLASS 0.98 0.43 0.46
1% PLASTIC 4% GLASS 2.24 0.48 1.84
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Static Creep (Unaged)
0 100 500 1000 2000 3000 35000
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
900000
1000000
control 5% G5% P2.5% P 2.5% G4% P 1% G1% P 4% G
STATIC CREEP OF UNAGED SAMPLES
Time (sec)
Perm
anen
t def
orm
atio
n 1
0⁶
mm
⁻
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Static Creep (Short-term Ageing)
0 100 500 1000 2000 3000 35000
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
control
5% G
5% P
2.5% P 2.5% G
4% P 1% G
1% P 4% G
Time (sec)
Pe
rman
ent d
efor
mat
ion
10⁶
mm
⁻
STATIC CREEP OF SHORT-TERM AGEING SAMPLES
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Static Creep (Long-term Ageing)
0 100 500 1000 2000 3000 35000
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
900000
1000000
control 5% G5% P2.5% P 2.5% G4% P 1% G1% P 4% G
STATIC CREEP LONG-TERM AGEING SAM-PLES
Time (sec)
Pe
rman
ent d
efor
mat
ion
x10
⁶ m
m⁻
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RESULT AND DISCUSSIONSTATIC CREEP INDEX (CRI)
STATIC INDEX (CRI)
SAMPLES UNAGED SHORT-TERM LONG-TERM
CONTROL 1.00 1.00 1.00
5% GLASS 1.21 0.57 0.43
5% PLASTIC 4.43 1.31 1.16
2.5% GLASS 2.5%PLASTIC
1.62 2.67 1.41
4% PLASTIC 1% GLASS 3.74 1.45 1.56
1% PLASTIC 4% GLASS 1.74 2.64 1.24
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Dynamic Creep (Unaged)
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 18000
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
control 5% G5% P2.5% P 2.5% G4% P 1% G1% P 4% G
Cycle
DYNAMIC CREEP OF UNAGED SAMPLES
Perm
anen
t def
orm
atio
n x1
0⁶
mm
⁻
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Dynamic Creep (Short-term Ageing)
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 18000
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
control
5% G
5% P
2.5% P 2.5% G
4% P 1% G
1% P 4% G
DYNAMIC CREEP OF SHORT-TERM AGEING SAMPLES
Cycle
P
erm
anen
t def
orm
atio
n x1
0⁶
mm
⁻
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Dynamic Creep (Long-term Ageing)
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 18000
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
control 5% G5% P2.5% P 2.5% G4% P 1% G1% P 4% G
Cycle
P
erm
anen
t def
orm
atio
n x1
0⁶ ⁻
mm
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RESULT AND DISCUSSIONDYNAMIC CREEP INDEX (DRI)
DYNAMIC INDEX
SAMPLES UNAGED SHORT-TERM LONG-TERM
CONTROL 1.00 1.00 1.00
5% GLASS 1.52 1.45 1.49
5% PLASTIC 2.32 2.85 1.79
2.5% GLASS 2.5%PLASTIC
1.54 3.54 1.80
4% PLASTIC 1% GLASS 1.73 3.08 2.99
1% PLASTIC 4% GLASS 0.85 2.97 0.63
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
MODELLING ABAQUS
Unaged Samples
4% Glass 1% Plastic
5% PLASTIC
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
MODELLING ABAQUS
SHORT-TERM AGEING
5% GLASS
2.5% GLASS 2.5% PLASTIC
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
MODELLING ABAQUS
LONG-TERM AGEING
4% GLASS 1% PLASTIC
1% GLASS 4% PLASTIC
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
COMPARISON BETWEEN MODELLING AND EXPERIMENT
Unaged Short-term ageing Long-term ageingMixtures
Exp FEM Error Exp FEM Error Exp FEM Error
(mm) (mm) % (mm) (mm) % (mm) (mm) %
control 0.38 0.38 1.64 0.27 0.29 8.21 0.42 0.43 2.97
5% Glass 0.58 0.60 2.16 0.39 0.39 0.89 0.63 0.63 0.88
5% Plastic 0.76 0.70 7.84 0.23 0.21 7.09 0.76 0.68 10.69
2.5% Plastic 2.5% Glass 0.56 0.55 1.63 0.96 0.82 14.56 0.76 0.65 14.13
4% Plastic 1% Glass 0.65 0.65 0.58 0.83 0.77 7.11 1.25 1.20 4.43
1% Plastic 4% Glass 0.30 0.32 6.80 0.80 0.76 5.78 0.27 0.28 2.98
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
CONCLUSIONS It was found that replacements of 1% recycled
plastics and 4% recycled glass (1% P + 4% G) show almost similar and satisfactory result compared to control sample for all tests.
The same results can be found, where the presence of 1%P + 4% G shows consistent results for short-term and long term ageing conditions.
It can be concluded that recycled plastics and recycled glass, at their optimum blending, can be considered feasible to be used as an aggregate replacement in asphalt mixtures for flexible pavement.
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014
RECOMMENDATIONSIt is recommend to use 10%, 15% and
20% of recycled materials in futureRecommend to carry out fatigue,
dynamic test and wheel tracker test for the performance testing of asphalt mixture
Since plastic melt in high temperature, so it is recommended to use warm mix asphalt
Carry out moisture damage test
VIVA SIPINTAR 2013/2014