vlf & mag sur erichsen l prop€¦ · figure no. l - location map 3 figure no. 2 - claim sketch...
TRANSCRIPT
S3B15NEa0M 53B15568821 N. CARIBOU LAKE 010
REPORT
ON
VLF-EM AND MAGNETIC SURVEYS
ERICHSEN LAKE PROPERTY
DISTRICT OF KENORA, PATRICIA MINING DIVISION
NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO
MOSS RESOURCES LTD.
FOR
635479 ONTARIO LTD.
RECEIVED
F t; B i ;i 1986
MINING WNDS SECTION
January, 1986 H.J. Hodge, P.Eng.
53B15NEMM 53B15SE8e21 N. CARIBOU LAKE010C
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0 8.0 9.0
10.0
11.012.0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
SUMMARY l
INTRODUCTION 2
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 2
LOCATION, ACCESS AND SERVICES 2
Figure No. l - Location Map 3
Figure No. 2 - Claim Sketch 4Figure No. 3 - Regional Geology Si Mineral Occurrences 5
PREVIOUS wo..;; 6PHYSIOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION 6
REGIONAL GEOLOGY 6PROPERTY GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION 7DESCRIPTION OF GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY PROGRAM 8
RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION 9
10.1 MAGNETIC SURVEY 9
10.2 VLF-ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY 10
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14
REFERENCES 15
APPENDICES
A: Certificate of Qualification
B: Technical Data Statement(back of report!)
Drawing No. 1
Drawing No. 2
Drawing No. 3
VLF-EM Survey - Inphase
Quadrature Profiles
Magnetometer Survey -
Vertical Field Readings
Magnetometer Survey -
Vertical Field Contours
(map pocket) ]
1.0 SUMMARY
The following report describes results of VLF-EM and Magnetic
Surveys carried out over the Erichsen Lake property of Moss Resources Ltd. for 635479 Ontario Ltd. in November and
December, 1985.
This property is located 100 miles north of Pickle
Lake. Access can be gained by float plane from Pickle Lake
or from Weagamow Lake, 40 miles to the west. A winter road
has been constructed into the Musselwhite property from
Highway 808, and provides winter access to within 20 miles
to the south of the property.
The property lies on the south limb of a synclinal fold which parallels the North Caribou greenstone belt along
its central core. It straddles a northwest-southeast contact
between metasediments on the northeast, occupying the core
of the syncline,and metavolcanics on the southwest. This
contact is marked by a band of iron formation which trends southeasterly through the property of Eldor Resources Limited,
which the Erichsen Lake property encompasses. Gold has
been found on the Eldor property in association with the iron formation.
Results of the geophysical surveys indicate at least 18 conductive zones representing iron formation, sulphide
mineralization and shear/fault zones. Folding of the iron
formation-sulphide zones is indicated in several localities
on the property.
The property is considered to have good potential for
economic gold deposits, and a comprehensive two-phase exploration
program is recommended. Phase I should consist of detailed
geological mapping, prospecting and geochemical sampling, and will cost an estimated $40,000. Phase II should consist of diamond drilling.
- 2 -
2.0 INTRODUCTION
This report describes results of VLF-EM and Magnetic
Surveys carried out over the Erichsen Lake property of Moss
Resources Ltd. for 635479 Ontario Ltd. in November and December,
1985.
3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Erichsen Lake property consists of 54 claims located
off the northeast end of North Caribou Lake. The claims
are recorded on the Ministry of Natural Resources Erichsen
and North Caribou Lakes claim sheets (G-2029 and G-2147),
Patricia Mining Division, Kenora District. The claim numbers
and recording dates are shown below.
Claims
Pa 836425 to 836456 inclusive 32 claims
Pa 836459 to 836465 inclusive 7 claims
Pa 836468 to 836482 inclusive 15 claims
TOTAL 54 claims
Recording Dates
July 8th, 1985
July 8th, 1985
July 8th, 1985
The claims are wholly owned by Moss Resources Ltd.
804-34 King Street East, Toronto, Ontario M5C 1E5.
4.0 LOCATION, ACCESS AND SERVICES
The property is located 100 miles north-northwest of
Pickle Lake, 180 miles northeast of Red Lake, 40 miles east
of the Weagamow Indian Reserve No. 87. Access to the property
can be gained by float-or ski-equipped aircraft from Pickle
Lake, Red Lake, and Weagamow Lake.
A winter road from Highway 808 to the Muss^lwhite gold
property, 20 miles to the south, provides winter road access
to the area.
M!4^-:.^ n n /*\ D P D T V
/ C.^ 1 \\ OPAPIMISKAN LAKE ^i ̂ X~t* ^'"^^
^j-.j^sl^ri-.'S.jv.' V"
t
l ,~\ r?* LAKEx*--—i-i x-—' V'' ,-I R ED LAKE 'f''^ ? *~~*^^ '--l'' ~~~S CC) ".—~, ^''
^•-___.^ J V~-"J^ ^' ^ ,-'x''~~5-''~'-t-t'"--~' -NJ. *^"" ' ~ -1 -- -I-'' ii?/
PICKLE
O N T A R
KENORA ,^ , ~^ f'
-,r'^ -V^BP"::;^VVM'ATTABI
MOOSONEE
f"-' TIMMIN^
KIRKLAND
UNITED
STATES
'I'-' Greenstone Belts
(OOmiles d
MOSS RESOURCES LTD.
ERICHSEN LAKE PROPERTY
Patricia M.D., Ontario
LOCATION MAP
8364J9 636430 l 636431
r —t— -4—--'8364350-*!
/^1^}J____ ^.
636442 1636443) 836*44 j 836445
' . J~ ———— i ——— ji~ T
636448) 836447 | 636446
l l----f---
836473 l 636472 l 636471 ^636470 l 836469
- ——4. ———— 4-- ——— 4-—————4-————4.--- I l
63647* ! 836477 ! 83647S 836479 836460
MOSS RESOURCES LTD.fflS.,J\\ERICHSEN LAKE PROPER!
Patricia M.D., Ontario
CLAIM SKETCH
OEOCANEX LTD TORONTO, CANADA
'45
MOSS RESOURCES LTD
VAN HORNE GOLD EXPLORATION INC
NORTH CARIBOU-OPAPIMISKANNEAWAGANK LAKES
GREENSTONE BELTREGIONAL GEOLOGY
AND MINERALOCCURRENCES
ERICHSEN LAKE PROPERTYGEOCANEX LTD
TORONTO. CANADA
Metovolca.ncs
Mefasediments r~" l i Stoked ground
Moss Resources Ltd
Vcn Horne Gold Exploration Inc
Granitic intru e Metamorphic Opapimiskan
LakeMUSSELWHITE DEPOSITS DOME-INCO-ESSO- LACAIMAIron formation
4- 3.0OO.OOO tons 01 7oz7ton Au
Gold occurrences
ForesterLake
i— -j——i Synclinal FoldLo.xj-S
(T) Musselwhite deposit
'1) Teol prospect(3) Agutua Arm prospect
(4) Centre Loke prospect(5) Eyopomikamo Loke Mo, F prospect
(5) Opapimiskan Lake prospect(T) Neawagank Lake .orospect
@ L ibert Lake prospect(9) Sage Loke prospect@ Stanley Loke prospect(ij) Seeseep Lake prospect
o ^n —52 0 30
- 6 -
5.0 PREVIOUS WORK
Government reconnaisance mapping by Satterly (1939)
at l inch to l mile, Bartlett et al (1985) at l inch to
\ mile, an aeromagnetic survey (ODM-GSC, 1960) at l inch
to l mile, and a Ministry of Northern Affairs and Mines
Airborne magnetic and electromagnetic survey (1986), constitute
the only significant recorded work on the property to date.
6.0 PHYSIOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION
The property is generally flat, and consists of interspersed
northeast trending, forested, low, glacially derived hills
with wet swamps. Outcrop is generally sparse.
7.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY
The Erichsen Lake property is located in the north-
central portion of the North Caribou-Opapimiskan-Neawagank
Lakes greenstone belt. Due to the relative remoteness of
the area, the belt has not been extensively worked by mining
and exploration companies. Most of the available geological
information on the area is from government funded geological/
geophysical surveys. The Ontario Geological Survey is currently
involved in the second year of a three-year geological/geophysical
survey of the area, manned by staff from the Precambrian
Geology, Engineering and Terrain Geology, and Mineral Deposits
Sections .
The belt forms part of the Sachigo Subprovince which
is composed of several small, irregularly-shaped sequences
of supracrustal rocks. The rocks in this subprovince are
evolutionarily distinct and probably older than the rocks
in the Uchi and Wabigoon subprovinces to the south (Bartlett
et al, 1985). The belt forms an arcuate, horn-shaped assemblage
- 7 -
of metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks which have been
synclinally folded about an axis approximately conincident
with Eyapimikama Lake (Satterly, 1941). The syncline is
rimmed by mafic volcanics on the north and south, and filled
with trough, cross stratified, epiclastic accumulations
in the axial portion. Two fairly continuous bands of iron
formation and chemical sediments mark the contacts between
the volcanics and sediments (Bartlett et al, 1985). Regional
geological maps indicate that the belt is bounded by paragneiss
and migmatized rocks in the north, and felsic intrusives
in the west and south (Map 2292, Big Trout - North Caribou
Lake).
The entire belt extends from Weagamow Lake in the north
west to Opapimiskan Lake in the southeast. South of Opapimiskan
Lake the belt bifurcates into two major lobes; one lobe
extending south through Libert Lake, the other through the
Forester and Neawagank Lakes areas.
8.0 PROPERTY GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION
There has been no detailed geological mapping on the
property. Reconnaissance mapping by the Ontario Geological
Survey (Bartlett et al, 1986 and Satterly, 1939), indicates
that the property lies on the south limb of a major synclinal
fold which axis parallels the belt. The property straddles
a northwest-trending contact between mainly metasediments
on the northeast, and metavolcanics on the southwest.
Airborne magnetics (Map 80730) indicate that this contact
is marked by iron formation which trends southeasterly through
the claims held by Eldor Resources, which are encompassed
by the Erichsen Lake claims.
- 8 -
Gold mineralization is known to occur on the Fldor
Resources property where diamond drilling has indicated
several auriferous zones associated with the iron formation.
No assays are reported.
9.O DESCRIPTION OF THE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY PROGRAM
The linecutting and geophysical surveys were carried
out between November 27th and December 3rd, 1985.
The surveys were conducted on northeast-southwest picket
lines at 450-foot intervals off base lines northeast and
southwest of the Eldor Resources claims. Total line miles
of grid was 50.9 miles (81.4 km).
The magnetic survey utilized a Scintrex MF-2 fluxgate
magnetometer with a reading resolution of 10 gammas on
the low range scale. Diurnal changes were estimated by
taking repeat readings at designated base stations at time
intervals not exceeding 1.5 hours. Readings were taken
at 100-foot intervals and 50-foot intervals over anomalous
areas.
The VLF-EM survey utilized a Geonics EM-16 receiver
tuned to receive 21.4 KHz. Readings of In Phase and Quadrature
were taken at 100-foot intervals along all lines, and at
50-foot intervals over anomalous areas.
Results of the magnetic and VLF-EM surveys are shown
on Drawings Nos. 1,2 and 3 at the back of this report.
- 9 -
Breakdown of the personnel and dates of the program are given below.
NAME AND ADDRESS
J. Robert, Amos, P.Q. C. Darveau, Amos, P. Q. R. Darveau, Amos, P.Q. R. Champagne, Amos, P.Q. R. Gilbert, Amos, P.Q. M. Lariviere, Amos, P.Q. F. Recoskie, Vald'or, P.Q. D. Recoskie, Vald'or, P.Q. C. Beggs, Toronto, Ont. J. Hodge, Devlin, Ont.
TYPE OF WORK
LinecuttingLinecuttingLinecuttingLinecuttingLinecuttingLinecuttingMagnetic SurveyVLF-EM SurveyVLF-EM SurveyParty Chief-Magnetic Survey
DATES
Nov.Nov.Nov.Nov.Nov.Nov.Nov.Nov.Nov.Nov.
27th27th27th27th27th27th27th27th27th27th
- Dec.- Dec.- Dec.- Dec.- Dec.- Dec.- Dec.- Dec.- Dec.- Dec.
3rd,3rd,3rd,3rd,3rd,3rd,3rd,3rd,3rd,3rd,
1985198519851985198519851985198519851985
10.0 RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION
10.1 MAGNETIC SURVEY
i
Property magnetics generally reflect bedrock stratigrapljiy
trending northwest-southeast across the property.
Generally higher magnetics, southwest of the
Eldor Resources property, reflect greater concentration
of magnetic minerals in the metavolcanic rocks compared to i
the area northeast of the Eldor claims which are underlain \
primarily by metasediments .
The strong magnetic high (up to 5,300 gammas)
on line 60 west at 32 south,represents the main banded iron
formation which crosses southeasterly through the Eldor property, i
marking the approximate location of the metavolcanic-meta- |
sedimentary contact.
In the southwest portion of the property numerous,
somewhat discontinuous, magnetic highs, up to 5,000 gammas,
indicate probable lean oxide facies (magnetite) and/or sulphide
facies (pyrrhotite, pyrite) iron formation. In several
- 10 -
locations, such as in the area of 20 west, 72 south, distinct
curvatures in magnetic high trends suggest isoclinal folding.
In the northeast sector of the property, a number
of parallel., northeast-southwest trending magnetic features,
generally lows, indicate bedrock structural lineaments, possibly
faulting. These features may persist southwestward southwest
of the Eldor property; however, they are somewhat less distinct
in that area because of higher magnetics in the metavolcanics.
10.2 VLF-ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY
ZONE A - This is a moderate-to-weak conductor
which is approximately 1,600 feet long. Amplitudes are
generally small except on line 8 west where the peak-to-
peak amplitude is 49/i. Anomaly width suggests a deep
source. There is no direct magnetic correlation
although slightly elevated magnetics occur near the
southwest end of the conductor. This zone may be due
to non-magnetic sulphides and/or graphite, or possibly
shearing with minor sulphides.
ZONE B - This is a weak, three-line conductor
with maximum peak amplitude of 44/i. It is associated
with a slightly elevated magnetic anomaly, and in all
probability, represents a bedrock zone, possibly weak,
magnetite iron formation or sulphide mineralization.
ZONE C - This zone is also a short, weak conductor
which occurs immediately northeast of the Eldor property.
It occurs on the north flank of a weak magnetic feature
and may be slightly transgressive to it. It may represent
a shear zone with sulphides.
- 11 -
ZONE D - This is a moderate, well-defined three-
line conductor which occurs just north of the main iron
formation on the Eldor property. It is associated with
a magnetic high, and probably represents iron formation.
It is in line with Zone C and may be a continuation of
that zone across the Eldor claims and hence, may
represent a shear zone.
ZONE E - This is a strong conductor which weakens
to the northeast off the property. Peak-to-peak
amplitudes on line 60 west is 8770 . This conductor
is associated directly with a magnetic high which
represents the main iron formation band which trends
southeasterly through the Eldor property.
ZONE F - This is a very weak conductor with
maximum amplitude of 2570 . It is broad, suggesting a
deeper source or possibly a conductive source in the
overburden. There is no apparent magnetic correlation.
An apparent offset occurs on line 44 east.
ZONE G - This is a weak-to-moderate conductor
with an on-property strike length of 800 feet. An
In Phase reversal occurs on line 52 east. This
conductor is associated directly with a magnetic high
(over 2,000 gammas) and both terminate abruptly between
line 40 and 44 east. This conductor is probably
caused by lean, magnetite iron formation and/or sulphides.
ZONE H - This is a long variable conductor
which extends from line 8 west for 4,000 feet off
the property to the southeast. It is associated
direcfy with a magnetic high, and the strongest seg
ments of the anomaly occur with the maximum magnetic
readings. The conductor is particularly strong
- 12 -
between lines 8 and 20 east where maximum peak-to-
peak amplitude is 727.. This is probably caused by
sulphide mineralization with possible lean, magnetite
iron formation.
ZONES J, K AND L - These are very weak con
ductors which are all associated with the same magnetic
zone which extends discontinuously across the property.
Zone K is slightly transgressive and may reflect folding.
The magnetic intensity, which reaches 5,200 gammas in the
northwesternmost line, 40 west, indicates that this zone
represents lean, oxide facies and/or sulphide facies
iron formation.
ZONE M - This is a weak-to-moderate conductor
which is associated directly with a magnetic feature
suggesting pyrrhotite-rich sulphides or lean, magnetite
iron formation.
ZONE N - This is a short but well-defined
strong conductor with peak-to-peak amplitude up to
83/i. It appears to be slightly transgressive to poorly
defined magnetic features and may represent a massive
sulphide zone or possibly a graphitic zone. Also, its
relationship to Zones O and P may represent tight,
isoclinal folding in this area.
ZONE O - This is a weak conductor which also
appears to be slightly transgressive to magnetic
features and possibly to bedrock stratigraphy. It
probably represents a weak sulphide zone, possibly
associated with shearing.
- 13 -
ZONE P - This zone is a moderate, but poorly
defined, conductive zone which is parallel to Zones
N and O. It shows a poorly defined correlation with
a magnetic high, and probably represents sulphides.
ZONE Q - This is a generally weak conductor
which has an on-property strike length of 4,000 feet.
It is stronger on its northwest segment, and at its
southeast end, where it converges with Zone P. It is
associated in part with poorly defined, discontinuous
magnetic highs and probably represents a sulphide
zone with possibly minor magnetite. It may represent
the south limb of a fold which closes southeastward
with Zone P.
ZONE R - This is a short, weak conductor which
trends northwest-southeast,transgressive to the
property stratigraphy. It has no apparent magnetic
correlation. It may represent a shear zone or possibly
a s urficial conductor.
ZONE S - This is a weak conductor which is
associated with a rong magnetic feature. It probably
represents lean iron formation.
ZONE T - This zone is a slightly stronger
two-line conductor which appears to be transgressive
to the same strong magnetic feature with which Zone S is associated. It probably represents shearing;
however, it could represent a folded segment of Zone S.
- 1A -
11.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Results of the VLF-EM and Magnetic Survey indicate that
the Erichsen Lake property flanks the main iron formation
band which trends southeasterly through the Eldor property.
At least 18 conductive zones have been identified on the
property, many of which are indicated to be caused by sulphides
and lean iron formation. Several represent transgressive
shear or fault zones, and there is an indication in several
localities that tight, isoclinal folding of the sulphide/iron
formation bands are a strong probability.
A set of parallel, northeast-southwest structural lineaments
are indicated by the magnetics, particularly in the northeast
portion of the property, where the magnetic intensity is
stronger in the metasediments. However, these lineaments
are indicated to persist into the metavolcanics in the southwest
portion of the property.
This combination of iron formation, sulphide mineralization
and structural complexity, provides excellent potential for
localization of gold deposits on this property, similar j
to the Musselwhite property, 20 miles to the south, and along
the same stratigraphic trend. Gold has been found on the
property of Eldor Resources, which is surrounded by the Moss property
A comprehensive exploration program is recommended to ;
investigate the gold potential of the property. This should
be a two-phase program starting in Phase I with detailed l
geological mapping, prospecting, and geochemical sampling,
to be followed by Phase II diamond drilling.
The estimated cost of Phase I is S40,000.
Respect
H.J. Hodg"
- 15 -
12.0 REFERENCES
Bartlett, J.R,, Breaks, F.W., Dekemp, E.A., and Shields, H.N.,1985. Precambrian Geology of the Eyapimikama Lake Area (Opapimiskan Lake Project), District of Kenora (Patricia Portion); Ontario Geological Survey, Map P. 2834, Geological Series - Preliminary Map.
Ministry of Natural Resources, 1983. Nap 2292; Big Trouc Lake -North Caribou Lake, Geological Compilation Series, l inch to 4 milp.s.
North, J., and Higginson, R., 1985. Report on Geological Mapping,Lithogeochemical Sampling and Prospecting, Stanley Lake Property; Private Report, Moss Resources Ltd.
Ontario Department of Mines-Ontario Geological Survey, 1960.Map 919G; North Caribou Lake, l inch to l mile.
Ontario Geological Survey. 1986. Opapimiskan Lake Area,Airborne Electromagnetic Survey. Total Intensity Magnetic Survey, District of Kenora, Patricia Portion.
Satterly, J., 1939. Geology of the Windigo - North CaribouLakes Area; ODM, Vol.48, part 9, pg. 1-32.
Thurston, P.C., Sage, R.P., and Siragusa, G,M., 1979. Geologyof the Winisk Lake Area, District of Kenora, Patricia Portion; OGS Report 193, pg. 61-86.
T
APPENDIX A
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATION
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATION
I, HARRY J. HODGE, of the City of Toronto, in the Province
of Ontario, do hereby certify that:
1
2
I am a consulting geologist, employed by Geocanex Ltd.
I am a member in good standing of the Association of
Professional Engineers of the Province of Ontario.
I graduated in 1959 from St. Francis Xavier University
with a Bachelor of Science degree, and I have been
practicing my profession as a geologist for 26 years.
My report is based on a personal examination of the
property in 1985, and upon a diligent search and
review of all available pertinent technical data
published by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources,
and in the Assessment Records Libraries in Sioux
Lookout and Toronto; as well as private company reports
In this report I have disclosed all relevant material,
descriptive and interpretive, which is to the best
of my knowledge, necessary to gain a completb under
standing of the viability of the project and the recommendations .
DATED this Vi day ofA O
H.J. Hodge, P.Eng,
APPENDIX B
TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
File.
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survcy(s).Township or Area RnftK"Caribou
VLF-EM and Magnetic Surveys(G-202% ) LaHe (G-2167)
Claim HoMcr(s) See attached
Survey Company Jack F
Author of Report H. J. HodfeeAddress of Author 80A-34 King St. East Tor. Ont.
Covering Dates of S,.n,ey Nov. 27th - Dec. 3rd, 1985(linecutting to office)
Total Miles of Line o.t 50.9 line miles-—-————.
SPECIAL PROVISIONSCREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each
"additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical —Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer— Rndinrnrtrir
-Othrr. ,Onlogiral
Geochemical
DAYS per claim
4020
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provUion crcditi do not apply to airborne lurvcyi)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic adiometric
DATE: N^fXN 3 \
(enter dayt per claim)
SIGNATURE:/)Aulnaf of Reject or Agent
Res. Gcol.. .Qualifications s** 3 X
Prcvious Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSE! List numerically
See attached(prefix) (number)
3 1
.........
.........
^......,.........
TOTAL CLAIMS. 5A
637 (6/791
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Station* 2,500 Station interval *UU \ J()
l" " 407,
.Number of Readings 3' 400J
0-ine .pacing 400-feet
Profile scale..Contour interval 250'Ranutias
Instrument Scintrex MF-2 fluxgate magnetometer
INDUCED POLARIZATION
UV-H
(2 Zcs
U
Ez? s oerfbw*Jw
fcl0
^k— "
>*—
cr^-c/u.cc
Arrtirary — Srale rnnstant - 10 gammas ;n;,,rna l rm-rrrtinn mrthoH looping In tO base Stations |
Base Station check-in interval (houi Base Station location and value
In,tr..mtnt GeOtlicS EM-16
Poll configuration Verticalrn.Urparatuin Infinity
± 7 7 Acnirary.. ^ '" . . . .Method: (S FixedF^nry 21.4 KH Z NSS
,.\ 1.5 hoursvarious
receiver
transmitter CD Shoot back CD In line CD Parallel line Annapolis, MD. ;
{specify V.L.F. station) Pa ra mMrr. mM M,r^ I n PhaS6 8 nd Quadrature
'inMrurnwit . , .
Sralf rnnstant
rnrrrrtions maHe ,.
Base station value and location
Rlcvatirm accuracy
Instrument
Method D Time DomainPjiramrtcr* — On timr
-Off time.'
— Hrlay timr'— Integration time.
Power ,
171/k/^iir^fif* 9 frit \f
Electrode spacing —————————Tynr nt t-\frtrni\e'"' *
O Frequency Domain FrequencyRan^e
•l l' M V11 W*"'
A 1
/vV
t 1 . J? /'- -* J
53B15NE8084 53BI5SE8eai N. CARIBOU LAKE 900
^Ministry o f Norlhefn Affairs and Mines
Onianc/
Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Gt'ochcmical and Expenditures)
Mining Act
Instruction!: - Please type or print.— If number of minmq claims tjaversed
exceeds space on this form, ottaih a list.Not*; - Only djys credits calculated j m the
"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." cplumns.
Type of Survey**) To*vnthiri,o
VLF-EM and Magnetic. Surveys Ndrtn"Claim Holder(t)
See attachedAddress
804-34 King St. East, Toronto, Ontario M5C 1E5Survey Company JDaie o) Survey (from St ( oi
Jack F. Hodge j ^ j \}0 ^85 J 3^ ^N*ma end Address of Author (oi Goo-TochntcaJ report)
l.J. Hodge, 804-34 King Street East, Toronto, Ontario M5C
sen. Lake, (6-2029').. Caribou Lake ( G-.ilblProspector l Liconco NJo.
See attached !l
Total Miles of line Cut'
l.Pv5,. i 50.9 . .j .
1E5Credits Rerjuested pur Each Claim in Columns at riqht Minifiq Claims Traversed (List in numerical seciuence)Special Provisions
For first survey;
Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter toiails! hore
Airoorne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits ''D not apply to Aiiborne Surveys,
Expenditures (eType of Work Per
Performed on Clai
Cole
PATdjiS);S
mils)
A, 1,1,7^| J
ulation of Expenditure
Total Expenditures
Geophysical ! DfJ" p ttr i Claim
- Elociromagrietic AO
r- Magnolomoter OQ
.R .diom.u,c i
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical j 0W?n"
. E
- M
actromagnottc
agnetomotor
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Gfciochomical
1 Dayt por Claim
Electromagnetic -
Magnetometer
RiQl'Atf'IV
K?V{IJT 5te PI
iiruwa pi\A|in*U to llil
JAM 3 01986
lDays CFedits
S -s-
P.M. Il2i'^!^l^]5
Total Dayj Credits
15 sInstructions
Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right. S
l —————————— ... , , ,, f
Date
Jan. 27/86Certification Ver
Recorded H
X/
oltJof (X**'oon( ItjiOMHtu^e)
ymifvinq Report/rffWork ^
l 'tereby ceilify that l have a persona or witnessed same during and/or afier
Name and Postal Address ol
Toronto, On
Mining ClaimPrefix
See
— :.^
^ivfiifj/f i14^Ma
wfl^wilciMB^si
"v wi^i
.S:;
,,,-i* ' ,
-^.^.jA^i.'ii,
Number
attached
M
———————
Expend. Days Cr,
RL: t
r '
m^
^rfr . O^b i ?5
M ,
- 1
f,
1For Office Use Only
Total Days Cr. Date Recorded iR'cordod JfcrfrSor*^ZlliXfo Oato APProvod fl* R*cordod
Mining ClaimPrefix ; Number
lJ7^n^" '
\
#!\- "'
•S
m:l*K . ,
"** ——
iTota tclaim \epor
fe^
^
^
SO
•^-*^
fN1*^
)
nor
- xnumbet^f mining
s cover,odA)V this t of wojV.
Mining RecA'deo'
Orajit
H3^-7^
Ejxpend. Days Cr.
:-
-
5.
i^^--~^—.— __ .^xl2ij~ —— -/' — ̂~~7~
- '
. 1
^and intimate knowledge of the facts sot forth in the Report of Work annexed hWttjfhavmq performed ihe work its completion and the annexed report is truo.
Porion Corning
P. En g, 804-34 King St. Ea st
tario M5C 1E5 ^27^/^6
f'
Ci)rtitioO-Dy Uirfnj/dro)
f/ / f]'CVO i.V.-ji '
ERICHSEN LAKE PROPERTY
List of Claims
J?.
ask
36425 /36426 ,836427 836428
/' 836429 ' 836430 836431 836432 836433 836434 836435 836436 836437 836438 836439 836440 836441 836442 836443 836444 836445 836446 836447 836448 836449 836450 836451
Le
f,H.
t3
l\
MM,1?-IX^lx^ tx JX* ^^ Cx- ex u-tX
tX
iX tx*xt^tXIXotx tX6Xtxtx-
tXtX tx iX
Licence No. K 19788
Pa 836452 836453 836454 836455 836456 836459 836460 836461 836462 836463 836464 836465 336468 836469 836470 836471 836472 836473 836474 836475 836476 836477 836478 836479 836480 836481 836482
|P-/*
1
*
4
\
*
i?
f
;
tXiX txCX LX tX iX IX
4X iX
iXiX l/ is ftx*x-
t̂/ ex^x-tXtx-| i-x-LX-
54 claims
PATRICIA Mlf:*'G DiV.w E 8 E l tf E [fi]
J AN 3 Q 1 936A.M. P.M.
ERICHSEN LAKE PROPERTY
List of Claims
Frank Recoskie Licence No. K 19788
Pa 836425836426836427836428836429836430836431836432836433836434836435836436836437836438836439836440836441836442836443836444836445836446836447836448836449836450836451
Pa 836452836453836454836455836456836459836460836461836462836463836464836465336468836469836470836471836472836473836474836475836476836477836478836479836480836481836482
54 claims
V...
ERICHSEN LAKE PROPERTY
List of Claims
Frank Recoskie Licence No. K 19788
Pa 836425836426836427836428836429836430836431836432836433836434836435836436836437836438836439836440836441836442836443836444836445836446836447836448836449836450836451
Pa 836452836453836454836455836456836459836460836461836462836463836464836465336468836469836470836471836472836473836474836475836476836477836478836479836480836481836482
54 claims
804-34 KING ST. EASJT TORONTO, ONTARIO M5C 1E5
(416) 862-9078 iMOSS RESOURCES LTD.
February 13th, 1986
Mr. S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management BranchRoom 6643, Whitney BlockQueen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3
RE: Geological and Geophysical Reports
Dear Mr. Yundt,
Two copies each of the following reports are enclosed
Seeseep Lake Property Geophysical Erichsen Lake Property Geophysical Akow Lake Property Geological Se
Geophysical
I hope that you"have received copies of the related Report of Work for" the above-mentioned properties.
Yours very truly,
MOSS RESOURCES LTD.
\.June M. Hodge Secretary/treasurer
JMH Encl.
SEE ACCOMPANYING MAP(S) IDENTIFIED AS
53B//5 SE- ooji ft /-
LOCATED IN THE MAP CHANNEL IN THEFOLLOWING SEQUENCE
LEGEND
Grid line with I00' stations
Clnjm p ost a nd c laim line
Stream and l akeshore. .
Instrument...............Scmtrex fluxgate MF-2
Values of vertical field! base level of 60,000y
Contour interval................... 25 gammas
25 gamma contour
100 gamma contour
500 gamma contour .C~
Scale l" ; 400feet
MOSS RESOURCES LTD.
ERICHSEN LAKE PROPERTYPatricia Mining Division, Ontario
Magnetometer Survey VERTICAL FIELD CONTOURS
B-oo3.\ 4=3 GEOCANEX LTDTORONTO, CANADA
53BI5MEen0*4 53B15SE0e21 N. CARIBOU LAKE 200
LEGEND
C.nd line with I00' stations
Cicim post and claim line ...
Stream and lakeshore
Instrument.................Scintrex fluxgate MF-2
Readings of vertical field ±base level of 60,000d
5OO 1000 1500
Scale l" ^ 400feet
53 B /S" se- o o
MOSS RESOURCES LTD.
ERICHSEN LAKE PROPERTYPatricia Mining Division, Ontario
Magnetometer Survey VERTICAL FIELD READINGS
GEOCANEX LTDTORONTO. CANADA
BY: RTDATE: DEC. 1985SCALE: l": 400'DWG. No: Z
53B15NEO0O4 5381555*021 N. CARIBOU LAKE 210
,^
,/A H
/ x
x^vHI ^
-b0 \̂ s. -1 5-' J - x' ~
.M -A ^ l /O--/s 'i y y^ "" i xvi'—— ,V* l ^
t v -\ l ^ X^ -^
\l ^X"
A "\\ r ' *.X\" v Y \ '-x*J " V \ A '-y
v
LEGENDGrid line with I00' stations .
Claim post and claim line ...
Stream and lakeshore.......
Instrument.................. Geo nics E M - 16
Transmitter... ,.NSS , Annapolis, M.D.,21'4 kHz Readings plotted
Profiles at l'^40 0X0j plotted..... Inphase profile .......... ,........
Quadrature profile..............' — --— — — -
Readings taken facing.......... grid north
Conductor axis
Structural lineaments.... .......**v
, l
; ^
Scale l" ; 400feet
MOSS RESOURCES LTD.
ERICHSEN LAKE PROPERTYPatricia Mining Division, Ontario\ ;
VLF EM SURVEY Inphase A Quadrature Profiles
BY: R.TM DATE: DEC. 1965SCALE: l": 400'GEOCANEX LTD ———
TORONTO. CANADA JDWG. No: l
53B15NEWM 53B15SEM21 N. CARIBOU LAKE sso