voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
1/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 1 wp.2296.02IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2296 of 2002
1. Employees' State Insurance Corporation }Panchdeep Bhavan otla Road! Ne" #elhi
$. %he Secretary! Government o& India! }inistry o& (a)our! Shram Sha*tiBhavan! Ne" #elhi. }
+. %he Chairman!Standin, CommitteeESI Corporation! ESIC Buildin, }otla Road! Ne" #elhi.
-. %he #irector General!ESI Corporation! }ESIC Buildin,! otla Road! Ne" #elhi
. %he #eputy /dministrative 0&&icer }
2i,ilance3 ESI Corporation!Panchdeep Bhavan! otla Road!Ne" #elhi. }
4. %he 5inancial CommissionerESI Corporation! Panchdeep Bhavan!otla Road! Ne" #elhi. }
.. Petitioners vs
1. Shri /.2.%un,are R60 }%amhane 7ouse! Near Chavadi! Neral!%al ar8at #istrict Rai,ad
}$. Shri 7.5.Rane9t.Re,ional #irector!
::: Downloaded on - 19/03/2014 09:45:19 :::
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
2/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 2 wp.2296.02Su) Re,ional 0&&ice! ESIC }Panchdeep Bhavan!Ganesh Peth!Na,pur.
+. Shri 9.#.Barahate }Insurance Inspector (3Su) Re,ional 0&&ice!ESICPanchdeep Bhavan!Ganesh Peth!Na,pur. }
.. 0ri,. Respondent Nos.: ; hat are the conse?uences o& admission o& char,es )y a delin?uent
employee )e&ore the In?uiry 0&&icer in a disciplinary in?uiry and "hether
a&ter recordin, o& such admissions! the in?uiry can still proceed or can )e
closed to su)mit a in?uiry report is the moot issue "hich arises in the
present proceedin,s.
::: Downloaded on - 19/03/2014 09:45:19 :::
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
3/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 3 wp.2296.022. By the present petition under /rticle $$4 o& the Constitution o& India!the Employees State Insurance Corporation challen,es the 8ud,ment and
order dated
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
4/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 4 wp.2296.02char,e sheet dated $+..1AA@ "as issued to the 1st respondent )y thepetitioner. %he statement o& articles o& char,es contained 11 char,es in
respect o& various acts o& the 1strespondent durin, the period 1..1A
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
5/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 5 wp.2296.02order dated [email protected] issued )y the 1stpetitioner Shri 7.P. Rane the 9ointRe,ional #irector Su)Re,ional o&&ice! Na,pur "as appointed as the
In?uiry 0&&icer. Shri.S..Noor /hmed "as appointed as the presentin,
o&&icer &or the department to replace Shri S.R.Natra8anan "ho "as earlier
appointed as the presentin, o&&icer. /t the hearin, o& the in?uiry! &ied on
$+.A.1AA1 the 1strespondent epressed his ina)ility to appear as he "as on
leave on medical ,rounds. %he in?uiry proceedin,s "ere there&ore
ad8ourned to 4.1.1AA$ on "hich day the 1strespondent appeared and stated
that he has already denied all the char,es at the hearin, held on .1$.1AA@.
/t the said hearin,! the 1st respondent also con&irmed receipt o& the copies
o& the documents as relied upon )y the department in support o& the char,es
as also inspection o& the same "as ,iven a&ter "hich the 1 st respondent
stated that he did not "ant call &or any additional documents and that he did
not "ish to produce any "itness in support o& his de&ence. / re,ular in?uiry
"as &ied on $1.:.1AA$ and the same "as ad8ourned to +.1$.1AA$.
. 0n +.$.1AA$ the 1strespondent appeared )e&ore the In?uiry 0&&icer
and re?uested &or en,a,in, the services o& Shri 9.#.Barahate (e,al
Inspector3 o& the 1stpetitioner Corporation as his de&ence /ssistant. %his
::: Downloaded on - 19/03/2014 09:45:19 :::
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
6/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 6 wp.2296.02re?uest o& the 1strespondent "as accepted )y the In?uiry 0&&icer and it "asindicated that the in?uiry can commence as the initial &ormalities o&
inspection o& documents and &urnishin, copies thereo& "as over. /t the said
hearin, the de&ence assistant Shri 9.#.Barahate made a su)mission that
thou,h the 1strespondent had pleaded not ,uilty to all the 11 char,es in the
char,e sheet! the 1st respondent "anted to chan,e his plea and no" "ants
to plead ,uilty to all the 11 char,es! since on a second thou,ht he "as
satis&ied that the su)stance in each o& the char,es "as correct. %he #e&ence
/ssistant there&ore! sou,ht permission &or chan,in, the plea and &or
pleadin, the ,uilty to all the 11 char,es.
4. In this re,ard! in the recordin, o& the in?uiry proceedin,s o&
+.$.1AA$ all the 11 char,es "hich "ere independently enumerated under
"hich the respondent made the &ollo"in, hand"ritten endorsement )elo"
every char,e =
F I accept the char,e FS6d
/.2.%un,are3 +.$.1AA$
%he In?uiry 0&&icer recorded that in vie" o& the unconditional
::: Downloaded on - 19/03/2014 09:45:19 :::
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
7/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 7 wp.2296.02admission o& the char,es! there "ould not )e a necessity to ,o ahead "iththe in?uiry proceedin,s since all the char,es stood proved in totality. %he
In?uiry 0&&icer as*ed the 1strespondent "hether he had anythin, &urther to
to say )y "ay o& su)mission in "ritin,. /ccordin,ly! a letter dated
+.$.1AA$ "as su)mitted )y the 1strespondent as also si,ned )y the de&ence
assistant addressed to the 9oint Re,ional #irector in char,e Su)Re,ional
o&&ice! ESI Corporation Na,pur. %he letter reads as under =
F %o!
%he 9oint Re,ional #irector I603Su) Re,ional 0&&ice!
ESI Corporation!N/GPR.
Su)8ect= #epartmental En?uiry a,ainst me pendin,)e&ore you.
Sir!
I have to su)mit that I have care&ully ,one throu,h the char,es No.1 to11 levelled a,ainst me &or holdin, departmental En?uiry a,ainst me &or
misconduct and mis)ehaviour.
In this connection! I have to su)mit that the omissions and lapses
enumerated in the char,e sheet "ere not deli)erate on my part or "ith anulterior motive to ,ain somethin, &or me. %hey have occurred innocently durin,
the course o& dischar,in, my duties as a ana,er &or "hich I sincerely tendermy apolo,y.
I voluntarily and unconditionally plead ,uilty &or all the char,es
levelled a,ainst me and hum)ly re?uest you to *indly pardon me &or the same. Ihave &urther to su)mit that these omission and mista*es "ere occurred only
)ecause o& the mental distur)ance on account o& &amily pro)lems.
::: Downloaded on - 19/03/2014 09:45:20 :::
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
8/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 8 wp.2296.02I have to su)mit that my hum)le re?uest o& ta*in, lenient vie" ina"ardin, the punishment in my case may *indly )e conveyed to the #isciplinary/uthority &or "hich act o& *indness! I shall remain hi,hly o)li,ed.%han*in, you in anticipation!
Hours &aith&ully! S6d
/.2.%un,are 3 /N/GER GR/#EI
S6d 9.#.Barahate 3
#t.+.$.1AA$Place=Na,pur #E5ENCE /SSIS%/N% F
%he de&ence /ssistant o& the 1strespondent made oral su)missions
that it is a &act that lapses occurred on the part o& the 1st respondent.
7o"ever! all the lapses "ere on account o& the distur)ed mental condition
o& the 1st respondent and he had committed the o&&ences "ithout
understandin, the serious implications involved. It "as &urther su)mitted
that )ecause o& the distur)ed state o& mind on account o& certain domestic
pro)lems! the 1strespondent "as not havin, )alance e?uili)rium o& mind in
the result he committed the lapses &or "hich he &elt repented and "as
see*in, pardon havin, realied the mista*es he had committed. It "as
&urther su)mitted )y the de&ence /ssistant that i& the Corporation had )een
su)8ected to any monetary loss on account o& the lapses o& the 1st
respondent he "as ready to compensate the Corporation )y ma*in, ,ood
::: Downloaded on - 19/03/2014 09:45:20 :::
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
9/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 9 wp.2296.02the relevant losses. It "as stated that this re?uest may )e communicated tothe disciplinary authority as a special case "ith a re?uest that this
su)mission may )e *ept in vie" "hile a"ardin, the punishment i& any. It
"as &urther su)mitted that the lapses that "ere committed )y the 1st
respondent "ere not intentional and "as made in a distur)ed state o& mind
and hence he "as re?uestin, &or a minimum penalty that is prescri)ed
under the provisions o& la" and &urther su)mitted that he "ould )e vi,ilant!
very &aith&ul and very loyal and sincere in the per&ormance o& his duties
and "ill not ,ive any room &or any such complaint "as also recorded in
the in?uiry proceedin,s. %he In?uiry 0&&icer recorded that accordin,ly the
1st respondent "as in&ormed that on account o& the &act that the 1st
respondent had unconditionally and voluntarily pleaded ,uilty to all the
char,es the in?uiry is not re?uired to )e proceeded and that Shri um)har
the Re,ional #irector and r.P.N.#harmadhi*ari the /udit Inspector "ho
"ere present as "itnesses o& the mana,ement "ere there&ore! dischar,ed.
%he a&oresaid recordin, o& the in?uiry proceedin,s dated +.$.1AA$ "as
duly si,ned )y the 1strespondent and the de&ence /ssistant and all others
"ho "ere present.
:. %he 1strespondent therea&ter addressed a letter dated $A..1AA$ to
::: Downloaded on - 19/03/2014 09:45:20 :::
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
10/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 10 wp.2296.02the #irector General o& the 1stpetitioner statin, that as re,ards the in?uiryreport he had no comments to o&&er and re?uested to ta*e a lenient vie". By
a detailed order dated :.:.1AA$ passed )y the disciplinary authority! it "as
recorded that the char,es "hich "ere admitted "ere etremely serious. It
"as recorded that there "ere no etenuatin, circumstances in this case and
that the 1strespondent "as not a &it person to )e retained in the service o&
the 1stCorporation and hence the penalty o& dismissal "as imposed on the
1strespondent.
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
11/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 11 wp.2296.02he pleaded ,uilty it "ould save the 1st respondent &rom &urther mentalharassment and torture and only a minor punishment "ould )e imposed
a,ainst him. It "as prayed that the order o& dismissal )e set aside and he )e
reinstated in service.
A. %he /ppellate authority )y an order dated 1.4.1AA+ re8ected the
appeal &iled )y the 1strespondent. %he 1strespondent therea&ter pre&erred a
Revision Petition under Re,ulation $$ o& the Employees State Insurance
Corporation Sta&& and Conditions o& Service3 Re,ulation! 1AA )e&ore the
Secretary! Government o& India! inistry o& (a)our. By an order dated
1:.1$.1AA+ it "as held that the Revision Petition "as not maintaina)le.
1@. %he 1st respondent in the a&oresaid circumstances approached the
Central /dministrative %ri)unal! um)ai Bench! )y &ilin, 0ri,inal
/pplication No.
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
12/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 12 wp.2296.02pre8udice in active connivance "ith the de&ence /ssistant and hence theorder o& dismissal and order o& the appellate authority and the Revisional
authority "ere )adinla". %he Central /dministrative %ri)unal )y its
9ud,ment dated [email protected]@.$@@@ set aside the order o& dismissal and su)se?uent
orders passed )y the appellate authority and the Revisional authority and
remanded the matter to the disciplinary authority to eamine "hether there
"as clear admission o& ,uilt )y the 1st respondent and "hether it "as not
o)tained )y conspiracy )et"een the de&ence /ssistant and the In?uiry
0&&icer "ith an assurance that a lenient vie" in a"ardin, penalty shall )e
,ranted. /,ainst this 8ud,ment and order o& the Central /dministrative
%ri)unal!um)ai Bench! um)ai cross >rit petitions "ere &iled. %he
petitioners "as a,,rieved to the etent that the order o& dismissal passed )y
the disciplinary authority as con&irmed )y the appellate authority "as set
aside. %he 1st respondent "as a,,rieved to the etent that the Central
/dministrative %ri)unal directed the disciplinary authority to eamine
"hether there "as clear admission o& the ,uilt o& the 1st
respondent and to
test the alle,ation o& conspiracy )et"een the de&ence /ssistant and the
In?uiry o&&icer.
::: Downloaded on - 19/03/2014 09:45:20 :::
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
13/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 13 wp.2296.0211. / #ivision Bench o& this Court )y its 8ud,ment and order dated$+.-.$@@1 set aside the 8ud,ment and order dated [email protected]@.$@@@ passed )y the
Central /dministrative %ri)unal and restored 0ri,inal /pplication No.
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
14/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 14 wp.2296.021+. >e have heard r.Suresh umar learned counsel appearin, &or thepetitioner and r.Ramesh Rammurthy learned counsel appearin, &or the 1
st
respondent. >ith the assistance o& the learned counsel &or the parties! "e
have ,one throu,h record o& the present proceedin,s.
1-. (earned counsel &or the petitioner has su)mitted that the Central
/dministrative %ri)unal has erred in allo"in, the 0ri,inal application &iled
)y the 1st respondent "hen it "as an admitted position that the 1 st
respondent had accepted6a,reed to all the char,es )y a statement made in
"ritin, )e&ore the In?uiry 0&&icer. 7e &urther su)mits that the 1st
respondent &urther )y a letter dated +.$.1AA$ addressed to the Re,ional
#irector re?uested to ta*e a lenient vie" on the ,round that he has
voluntarily and unconditionally pleaded ,uilty to all the char,es. 7e
su)mits that not only this )ut the 1st respondent therea&ter )y a letter dated
$A..1AA$ addressed to the #irector General o& the 1 st respondent a,ain
re?uested to ta*e a lenient vie" "hich &urther compounded the voluntary
admission o& ,uilt in respect o& all the char,es as levelled a,ainst him.
(earned counsel &or the petitioner su)mits that the reliance on )ehal& o&
the 1strespondent on the 8ud,ment o& the Supreme Court in the case o&
::: Downloaded on - 19/03/2014 09:45:20 :::
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
15/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 15 wp.2296.029a,dish Prasad Saena vs.State o& adhya Bharat 1 as o)served )y theCentral /dministrative %ri)unal "as misplaced as the same had no
application in the &acts o& the present case. 7e &urther su)mits that on
merits the Central /dministrative %ri)unal could not have come to a
conclusion that the char,es a,ainst the 1st respondent are not proved. 7e
su)mits that there is an admission made )y the 1 strespondent )e&ore the
In?uiry 0&&icer and his su)se?uent conduct has not )een considered )y the
Central /dministrative %ri)unal.
1. (earned counsel &or the petitioner has relied upon the &ollo"in,
8ud,ments in support o& his su)mission that once the char,es are admitted
)y a delin?uent employee! a di&&erent stand cannot )e ta*en and that as a
lo,ical conse?uence o& the admission o& char,es! necessarily no &urther
in?uiry is re?uired to )e underta*en )y the disciplinary authority =
F/dditional #istrict a,istrate City3 vs Pra)ha*ar Chaturdevi ; anrJ$! #elhi %ransport
Corporation vs Shyam (al+! Chairman ; ana,in, #irector vs Gopara8u SriPra)ha*ar 7ari Ba)u-! ano8 7.ishra vs nion o& India ! Channa)asapa Basappa
7appali vs %he State o& ysore4 ! olhapur Dilla Saha*ari #udh tpada* San,h
vs.Shiva8i Shan*ar Phara*ate ; anr.:! Canara Ban* vs 7.%.oli ; anr.e &ind that the %ri)unal's conclusions are prima &acie not correct. %hestatement made )y the passen,er "ho had paid ecess money to the chec*in,
o&&icer is not in the nature o& hearsay evidence. /dditionally! the e&&ect o& the
admission re,ardin, ,uilt as contained in the letters dated 1+.1.1A
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
23/29
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
24/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 24 wp.2296.02R..(odha! as 7is (ordship then "as3 in case o& Ca(a%a Ba(1 )#H.T.8o,".supra3. #ealin, "ith a case arisin, out o& admission o& the ,uilt
in para 4!: and < the &ollo"in, o)servations "ere made=
F 4. 0nce the de&ence o& the employee that his statement made on ay $@!
1A
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
25/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 25 wp.2296.02FA. %he record o& the en?uiry discloses that the "or*men "ere permitted to )ede&ended )y an /dvocate. /&ter the en?uiry had commenced upon the issuance
o& a char,e sheet! the evidence o& the mana,ements' "itness! the ana,in,
#irector o& the petitioner! "as recorded on 11 th9une! 1AA@. 0n $:th 5e)ruary!1AA1 proceedin,s too* place in the course o& the en?uiry. %he En?uiry 0&&icer
noted that the "or*men had su)mitted a representation acceptin, the alle,ationo& misconduct contained in the char,e sheet dated < th /u,ust! 1A
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
26/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 26 wp.2296.02$. 7avin, considered the a&oresaid settled position in la" that once anemployee has admitted to the char,es and that there is no co,ent material to
sho" that the admission o& the char,es "as recorded under duress or &orce
or pressure and that the admission "as unconditional and in une?uivocal
terms! no &ault can )e &ound in the In?uiry 0&&icer closin, the in?uiry
proceedin,s. In the present case the disciplinary authority on the )asis o&
the in?uiry report "hich recorded the admission o& the 1st respondent held
that the char,es have )een proved. In our vie"! there "as nothin, unla"&ul
on the part o& the disciplinary authority proceedin, on such admission
made )y the 1strespondent to pass the order o& dismissal considerin, the
seriousness o& the char,es.
$4. In this )ac*,round! there is merit in the su)missions "hich are
ur,ed on )ehal& o& the petitioner that the Central /dministrative %ri)unal
could not have set aside the order o& dismissal as passed )y the disciplinary
authority. %here is also merit in the su)mission made )y learned counsel
appearin, on )ehal& the petitioner that the 8ud,ment in case o& Ja!"#$
P%a#a! Sa&'(a )# S*a*' of Ma!$+a B$a%a* supra3 "as not applica)le in
the &acts o& the present case on "hich much reliance "as placed )y the
::: Downloaded on - 19/03/2014 09:45:22 :::
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
27/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 27 wp.2296.02learned counsel appearin, on )ehal& o& the 1 strespondent. In this 8ud,ment!the Supreme Court "as dealin, "ith a case "here a char,e sheet "as
issued to the delin?uent employee on the )asis o& the alle,ed admissions he
had made in the course o& in?uiry directed a,ainst some other ,overnment
servant in connection "ith commission o& certain o&&ences! later on the
delin?uent employee "as removed &rom service on the stren,th o& the
alle,ed admission "ithout holdin, a &ormal in?uiry as re?uired )y the
Service Rules. In these circumstances! it "as held )y the Supreme Court
that the statement made )y the delin?uent employee did not amount to
unam)i,uous or clear admission o& his ,uilt and &ailure to hold a &ormal
in?uiry constituted a serious in&irmity in the order o& dismissal passed
a,ainst him. It is in this contet their (ordships o& the Supreme Court
made the &ollo"in, o)servations in para 11=
F11. It is true that the appellant speci&ically admitted durin, the course or the
previous en?uiry that ille,al li?uor had )een delivered to the contractor! and that
he had ,iven the *ey o& the receiver to Narona. It is on the stren,th o& thoseadmissions that the 7i,h Court too* the vie" that the appellant had su)stantially
admitted his ,uilt and so there "as really no need &or holdin, a &ormal en?uirya,ainst him a&ter the char,e sheet "as supplied to him. In this connection it is
necessary to remem)er that the previous en?uiry "as not directed a,ainst theappellant as such! and he "as certainly not in the position o& an accused in the
said en?uiry. In &act! as "e have already indicated! the result o& the said en?uiry"as that the appellant "as a)solved &rom any complicity in the commission o&
the o&&ence! and the only criticism made a,ainst him "as that he "as slac* in hissupervision! that is "hy he "as trans&erred. In such a case! even i& the appellant
::: Downloaded on - 19/03/2014 09:45:22 :::
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
28/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 28 wp.2296.02had made some statements "hich amounted to admission it is open to dou)t"hether he could )e removed &rom service on the stren,th o& the said alle,edadmissions "ithout holdin, a &ormal en?uiry as re?uired )y the rules. But apart&rom this consideration! i& the statements made )y the appellant do not amountto a clear or unam)i,uous admission o& his ,uilt! &ailure to hold a &ormal en?uiry
"ould certainly constitute a serious in&irmity in the order o& dismissal passeda,ainst him. K......J
$:. It is there&ore! clear that the &acts in the case o& Ja!"#$ P%a#a!
Sa&'(a supra3 "ere ?uite di&&erent in as much as the employee "as
proceeded "ithout a departmental in?uiry and hence the ratio in the said
8ud,ment "ould not )e applica)le in the &acts o& the present case.
$
-
8/12/2019 Voluntary confession of charges by worker can close down investigation
29/29
ombay
HighCour
tRNG 29 wp.2296.02contrary to the a&oresaid le,al position and hence cannot )e sustained.+@. In the result! >rit Petition is allo"ed. %he 8ud,ment and order
dated