waap-7652 we sting house ap1000 for vietnam_rev 1

1

© 2011 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

Westinghouse AP1000TM

for

Việt Nam

September 23, 2011

Richard DeLong – AP1000 Testing Program Manager

Rick Smith – Vietnam Business Development Manager

AP1000 is a trademark or registered trademark in the United States of Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, its subsidiaries and/or its

affiliates. This mark may also be used and/or registered in other countries throughout the world. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use is

strictly prohibited. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

2


AP1000 for Vietnam Outline

• Introduction & Overview

• Several Points about AP1000

• AP1000 Licensing Update

• Operations & Maintenance

• Project Approach to EPC Contracting

• Questions & Answers

3


Richard DeLong – AP1000 Testing Program Manager

– 30 Years Nuclear Experience

– 5 Years – US Submarine Force

– 24 Years Commercial Nuclear Utility Management

– PWR’s (South Texas Project, Harris, Waterford)

– BWR’s (Brunswick, Browns Ferry, Grand Gulf)

– Joined Westinghouse in April 2010

– Program Manager for Proof of Concept Testing of AP1000

– Certified AP1000 Startup Test Engineer (Level 3)

– Education

– BS Systems Engineering – US Naval Academy

– US Naval Nuclear Power School

– Certified Senior Reactor Operator – GE BWR4

4


Rick Smith – Vietnam Business Development Manager

– 21 Years International Power Industry Experience

– 7 Years – Thermal Power Plant Construction and Engineering

– 14 Years Commercial Nuclear Plant Engineering

– PWR’s (DC Cook, Beaver Valley)

– Joined Westinghouse in November 2007

– Program Manager China AP1000 Project

– Sanmen Startup Manager

– China Supply Chain Manager

– Business Development Manager for Vietnam – August 2010

– Education

– BS Mechanical Engineering, Western Michigan University

– MA Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan

5


Toshiba/Westinghouse

Business Expansion and Enhanced Competitiveness

BWR Business

Construction ABWR

Maintenance & Services

Mainly PWR Business

Construction AP1000

Maintenance & Services

The Global Leader, Promoting Both BWR and PWR Technologies

ABWR AP1000

Westinghouse

6


The Westinghouse Message in Vietnam We know the stakes are high and Vietnam greatly needs safe, clean, reliable

nuclear power… We can help you like no other company can to begin

your nuclear power industry by building on our experience in the United

States, Japan, Korea, China… And many other countries.

Westinghouse is willing to be your partner to help you reach your dream of

successfully building nuclear power plants to launch Vietnam’s

commercial nuclear power industry. We can help because…

● Westinghouse is leading the nuclear renaissance with the most advanced

commercial nuclear technology currently under construction in the U.S. and

China

● Certified Design

● 10 plants under construction

● Through the combined resources of Westinghouse and Toshiba, we are the

world leader in both PWR and BWR technology

Together we will succeed!

7


The Westinghouse advantages are many…

● Simplification of AP10000 design is key factor to success of new build; more schedule

and cost certainty

● Reduced number of components, easier operation and maintenance

● Passive Safety for high reliability and less operator action; responds favorably to

Japan like events

● Modular construction for shorter and more predictable schedule

● Standard plant for simpler procurement and application of lessons learned

● We are committed to localization and have considerable experience

● We can offer a variety of project implementation models to suit the particular customer

and market needs

● Engineering and Procurement with or without Construction (EP or EPC)

● Financing through appropriate Export Import banks

● Project investment

We look forward to working with Vietnam to develop your Nuclear

Power Generation Programs !

8


What we understand about Vietnam’s basic requirements…

We know Vietnam needs safe, reliable and clean nuclear power at a

reasonable price with the attributes:

• Plants to be based on Proven Design

• Favorable Price with Favorable Financing

• Support in Development of Vietnam’s Human Resources for Design,

Operation and Maintenance of it’s nuclear power plants

• Reliable, Long Term Nuclear Fuel Supply for Future Operations

• Practical Spent Fuel Treatment Plan

• Localization of Supply with Technology Transfer

We are here to listen, to share ideas and to learn because we believe

the Westinghouse AP1000 nuclear power plant delivers on

Vietnam’s needs in an extraordinary way…

9




• Several Points about AP1000TM





10


A Key Factor in New Nuclear Plant Success - Simplification

• Simplicity in Design through reduced number of components and bulk

commodities

• Simplicity in Safety through use of passive safety systems

• Simplicity in Construction through modularization

• Simplicity in Procurement through standardization of components and plant

design

• Simplicity in Operation and Maintenance through use of proven systems and

components, and man-machine interface advancements

Achieved with Passive Safety Systems!

Improved Safety, Competitive Economics and Optimized Performance:

Improvements in Safety do not have to increase plant complexity and costs

12


Shorter schedule & Increased safety & Improved quality

Modular Construction means more work done in parallel

AP1000TM: Designed for Greater Certainty Modular construction makes a difference

13


AP1000TM: Designed for Greater Certainty Simple, Practical, Standardized and Innovative

• Passive Safety replace

mechanical & electrical systems

-- results in fewer materials and

equipment

• Modular design drives faster,

predictable construction

schedule

• Reduced Operations and

Maintenance Cost versus other

plant designs

• Majority of design utilizes

proven Westinghouse

experience and technology

Result:

Reduced Construction Time, Greater Schedule Certainty with Lower Costs

Greater Levels of Safety and Quality

14









15


AP1000 Licensing Update

• U.S. Licensing Process

• US Licensing Update

• International Licensing Update

16


U.S. Licensing Process

• US Nuclear Law 10 CFR part 50

• Develop Preliminary Safety Analyses Report, PSAR

• PSAR is developed by utility and is based on proposed

design

• Regulatory review, Construction Permit

• Develop Final Safety Analyses Report, FSAR

• FSAR is developed by utility and is based on as-built

design

• Regulatory review, Operating Licensing

17



• U.S. Law 10 CFR Part 52

• Develop Design Control Document (DCD)

• DCD is developed by Nuclear Design and is based on final design details

• DCD is reviewed by regulator and receives Design Certification, plant design

can now be referenced for operating permit

• Utility submits a Combined Operating License (COL) application

• COL contains site and utility specific information, also references approved

DCD for nuclear design.

• COL is approved by regulator and receives permission to construct and

operate plant.

• Utility must submit completion of Inspection, Test Analyses Acceptance Criteria

(ITAAC) process to demonstrate plant as described in DCD is what was

constructed.

18



• DCD Content

• The AP1000 DCD was developed using the guidance of U.S.

Regulatory Guide 1.70 and has the following content;

• Chapter 1, Introduction

• Chapter 2, Characteristics

• Chapter 3, Design of Structures, Components, Equipment and

Systems

• Chapter 4, Reactor

• Chapter 5, Reactor Coolant System and Connected Systems

• Chapter 6, Engineered Safety Systems,

• Chapter 7, Instrumentation and Control

• Chapter 8, Electrical Power

19



• DCD Content con’t

• Chapter 9, Auxiliary Systems

• Chapter 10, Turbine and Power Conversion

• Chapter 11, Radioactive Waste Management

• Chapter 12, Radiation protection

• Chapter 13, Conduct of Operation

• Chapter 14, Initial Test program

• Chapter 15, Accident Analyses

• Chapter 16, Technical Specifications

• Chapter 17, Quality Assurance

• Chapter 18, Human Factors Engineering

• Chapter 19, Probabilistic Risk Assessment

20



The DCD is used:

1.In the U.S., the DCD is a single step Licensing document

for the 10 CFR Part 52 licensing process;

2.Or, as input for Preliminary Safety Analysis Report (PSAR)

or Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), in a 10 CFR Part

50 licensing process;

The China licensing is a two step process using the DCD as

in option 2 above.

21


US Licensing Update

• US Combined Operating License (COL) Process (10CFR Part

52)

• AP1000 Design Certification (DC) Status Update

• COL Status Update

22


US COL Process (10CFR Part 52)

Early Site Permit *

Construction

Construction Acceptance

Criteria *

Operation

* Public Comment Opportunity

Combined Operating License *

Design Certification *

23


AP1000 DC Status Update

Milestones Design Certification Amendment Application (DCD Revision 19) – Complete

NRC Complete Final Safety Evaluation (technical)– Complete

Design Certification Rule to Commissioners (legal) (~ Oct 2011): Rule Effective (~Dec 2011 / Jan

2012)

Regulatory Actions Resolved NRC confirmatory review questions and public meetings on Shield Building stress

analysis and Containment Vessel pressure – DCD Rev. 19 submitted June 13, 2011

Increasing level of support of site related activities (ITAAC, FSAR maintenance, inspections, etc)

Issues to Watch Impact of NRC Schedule on DC rule making could cause minor delay in COL

Impact of Fukushima event on regulatory review process

24


COL Status Update

• AP1000 Update – Southern Nuclear Company -

Vogtle – Southern Combined Operating License (~ Dec 2011 / Jan 2012)

WEC is providing a high level of COL related

AP1000 Design Certification expected by end of 2011 and COL for

Vogtle following up to 2 months after US NRC Issued the Final Safety Evaluation Report 9 August 2011

• AP1000 Update – SCANA – VC Summer – SCANA Combined Operating License (~Jan / Feb 2012)

Non Nuclear Construction in process

Major equipment fabrication continues on target to meet delivery dates

NRC currently expected to issue COL in Jan / Feb 2012 o US NRC Issued the Final Safety Evaluation Report 18 August 2011

25


International Licensing Update

• China

• UK GDA

• AP 1000 Licensing Summary

.

26


China Licensing Process US & China Approach

Certification

Approach Regulatory/Legal Regulatory /Contractual

Regulatory

Approach

10 CFR 52 Prescriptive

(e.g. NUREG)

2 step like, 10 CFR 50

Prescriptive

(Many China regs are based on

IAEA)

Maturity of

Process Mature Established, Expanding

Size of

Regulator Large (~4,000) Small (~400 + consultants)

Scope of

Review All

All Areas, including

Environment Impact

Operating LWRs 104 12 with 18 units under

construction

http://www.theodora.com/maps/china_map.html

27


China Update

● Sanmen o February 2008 - Owner submitted PSAR to National Nuclear Safety

Administration (NNSA)

o Regulatory Review Completed

o Construction Permit issued March 26, 2009

o First Concrete Pour completed end of March 2009

• Haiyang o May 2008 - Owner submitted PSAR to NNSA


o Construction Permit issued September 24, 2009.

o First Concrete Pour completed end of September 2009.

• FSAR (s) submittal February 2012

28


China Update

• Westinghouse Supporting Owner Licensing Submittals

Jun 2013 Jan 2014 July 2005 Feb 2007 Feb 2012

Mar 2009 Aug 2013

Contract

Signed PSAR

Issued

Complete Complete

1st Const

Permit /

Base Mat

Complete

FSAR

Issued Fuel

Load Initial

Criticality Full Power

Operations

Final Markup

STEP ONE

STEP TWO

4 AP1000s

Under

construction

China Licensing On Track

http://www.theodora.com/maps/china_map.html

29


UK GDA Update - Background and Process

The Regulatory Approach to New Build

Phase 1

Generic Design Assessment

Step 1

Design and Safety Case Preparation

Step 2

Fundamental Safety Review

Step 3

Design Safety Review

Step 4

Detailed Design Review

Phase 2

Site Licensing

Site Specific and

Operational Issues

30


UK GDA Update - Background and Process US & UK Regulatory Approach

Certification

Approach Regulatory/Legal

Goal/Policy Oriented,

(Not Regulatory)

Regulatory

Approach

Prescriptive

(e.g. NUREG)

Non Prescriptive

(e.g. Safety Assessment

Principles)

Maturity of

Process Mature 1st Time

Size of

Regulator Large Small ( + consultants)

Scope of

Review All Sampling

Operating

LWRs 104 1

31


UK GDA Update

Safety Submission Delivery

● Sanmen o February 2008 - Owner submitted PSAR to National Nuclear Safety

Administration (NNSA)


o Construction Permit issued March 26, 2009

o First Concrete Pour completed end of March 2009

• Haiyang o May 2008 - Owner submitted PSAR to NNSA


o Construction Permit issued September 24, 2009.

o First Concrete Pour completed end of September 2009.

• FSAR (s) submittal February 2012

Pre-Construction

Safety Report

Revision 0

UK AP1000

Environment

Report

UKP-GW-GL-

790, Revision 4

Pre-Construction

Environment Report

Revision 4

Plant Life

Cycle Safety

Report

UKP-GW-GL-

737, Revision 2

Plant Life Cycle

Safety Report

Revision 2

Design Reference

Point Revision 3

The Master

Submission List

UKP-GW-GLX-001

Revision 0

The above documents were delivered to the UK Regulator on or before 31st March 2011. The

background to the development and purpose of these documents was shown in the March 2011

edition of this report.

The Master Submission List of delivered to the UK Regulator on 2nd May 2011, The Roadmap

of the UK Generic Design Assessment was delivered to the UK Regulator on 5th March 2011

Roadmap of the

UK Generic

Design

Assessment of

the European

AP1000 Design

April 2011

32


UK GDA Update RI Closure

• On the 27th June 2011, ONR officially closed the

Regulatory Issue (RI). The RI raised in February 2010

was in connection with the design related to the

proposed “steel-concrete-steel” construction design for

certain key structures within the Nuclear Island.

Accordingly the regulators required Westinghouse to

provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate that the

strength and durability of these structures was

adequately justified.

• The closure of the RI signals a significant step towards

a Design Acceptance Confirmation and provides

confidence to potential customers looking at the

AP1000 design as a technology choice in the UK.

33


On 14th July 2011 ONR published their Quarterly Report for

the period between 1st April and 30th June 2011.

The report officially stated ONRs intent to award interim

Design Acceptance Confirmation (iDAC) and interim

Statement of Design Acceptability (iSODA) by the end of

2011, subject to agreed Resolution Plans.

The report goes on to state that both Requesting Parties

have completed a large amount of the technical questions

raised by ONR. From this process ONR state that, “we have

not identified any showstoppers and we now are left with a

set of GDA Issues that need to be addressed before we

would provide a Design Acceptance Confirmation”.

UK GDA Update - Current Status ONR Quarterly Report (1st April – 30th June 2011)

34


UK GDA Update Summary and Next Steps

• 51 GDA Issues and Resolution Plans

• “No showstoppers”

July 2011

Agree Resolution Plans

• Weightman Report due in September

• Internal analysis approaching completion

• Resolution Plan under construction

October 2011

Agree Fukushima Resolution Plan

•High level of confidence that final Design Acceptance Ceritficate /Statement of Design Acceptability are achievable.

December 2011

Achieve iDAC/iSoDA

• Fukushima Impact on Project Technology Selection schedules

• Progress to DAC/SoDA once AP1000 technology has been selected

Post December 2011

35


AP 1000 Licensing Summary

• AP 1000 Licensing Achievements

– Based on Internationally Achieved Licensing Milestones

– Chinese (NNSA)

– US (NRC)

– UK (ONR & EA)

– Others (IAEA & EUR, plus)

36






• Operations & Maintenance Advantages



37


Operations and Maintenance

• AP1000 is designed with ease of Operation and

Maintenance in mind.

– Over 50 Years supporting existing Plant O&M

– Owners Requirements Document

– Industry Best Practices from the Institute of Nuclear Plant

Operations (INPO)

– Risk Informed Equipment Reliability (AP913)

38


Operations Advantages

• Advanced Controls Improve Operator Interface

– Fault Tolerant and Advanced Automated Process Control

– Plant designed to Load Follow if desired

– Optimized for Industry Best Practice Human Factors

– Automated Emergency Procedures to enhance decision making and

Human Error Prevention (CPS)

• Plant is designed for Full Load rejection without SCRAM

– Fewer Challenges to safety systems

• Extremely Low Cobalt inventory

– Significantly lower On-line and Outage Dose Rates than current

designs

– Lower radwaste disposal costs

39


Maintenance Advantages

• Fewer components means lower maintenance cost

– Fewer On-line tasks

– Smaller Staff size

– Shorter less complex Refueling Outages

– Lower Spare Parts Inventories

• Components traditionally classified as Safety–Related are

Non-Safety in AP1000

– Easier to procure

– Expediting needed less often

– Lower Cost to procure

40


Simpler Design Requires Less Equipment and Less

Concrete, and Fewer Human Resources

50% Fewer

Valves

35% Fewer

Pumps

80% Less

Pipe

45% Less

Seismic Building

Volume

85% Less

Cable

Comparison of

Building Volumes

41


Projected Station Staffing (Greenfield)

42


On-Line Maintenance

• Fewer Safety-Related Active Components means:

– More Flexibility in scheduling maintenance

– Fewer Forced Outages due to Deterministic LCO Action Statements

• Fewer Active Components inside High Radiation Areas

– Better on-line accessibility

– Lower on-line accumulated dose

43


Examples of Forced Shutdowns

• Beaver Valley Power Station Unit 2

– October 8, 2008 – Low Head Safety Injection Pump wouldn’t rotate

by hand

– Found during routine preventive maintenance (72 Hour Shutdown

Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO))

– Found galled Wear Rings

– Utility requested and was granted Enforcement Discretion for 36

more hours.

– Additional difficulties in repair caused a forced shutdown.

• No Safety Related Emergency Core Cooling System

(ECCS) Pumps in AP 1000 means no forced shutdowns are

needed if pump maintenance takes longer than anticipated.

44


Examples of Forced Shutdowns (cont)

• Brunswick Steam Electric Plant

– September 13, 2009 – #4 Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) taken

out of service for routine maintenance (7 Day Shutdown LCO for

both Units)

– EDG failed to start during post maintenance testing on day 6 of the

Outage

– Foreign Material in Mechanical Governor hydraulics

– Additional repairs to governor took longer than a day to complete.

– Both units were shutdown until repairs were complete

• Backup Diesel Generators in AP1000 are Non- Safety

related and there are no shutdown LCO’s associated them.

45


AP1000 Features Designed for Short Outages

• AP1000 was designed to facilitate short outages

– AP1000 General Arrangement

– Shutdown (S/D) and Startup (S/U) Improvements

– S/D Maintenance Improvements

– Refueling Improvements

• AP1000 is designed to meet European (EUR) requirements

for advanced passive plants.

• Preliminary duration for refueling plus maintenance outage

is < 17 days.

46


AP1000 General Arrangement

• Improved Maintenance / Inspection

– Increased laydown area inside containment

– Access platforms provided for equipment maintenance / inspection

• Improved Access to Containment

– Equipment hatch(s) access from auxiliary building

– Equipment hatches and personnel airlocks at both grade and

operating deck levels

• Improved Separation

– Radioactive vs nonradioactive

– Fire areas, especially inside containment

– Safety vs nonsafety

47


AP1000 S/D Maintenance Improvements

• Permanent work platforms built into plant

• Permanent service connections (air, power, computers)

• Improved containment laydown areas

• 2 containment hatches (1 for trucks)

• Staging area for containment equipment

• Significantly reduced In-Service Inspection/Testing (ISI /

IST) with passive systems

• Maintain non-safety active systems at power

• Minimized maintenance for canned-rotor Reactor Coolant

Pumps (RCPs)

48


AP1000 S/D and S/U Improvements

• Variable-speed RCPs facilitate Reactor Coolant System (RCS)

Cool down (C/D)

• Automatic Steam Generator (SG) S/D water level control

• Automated steam dump and Normal Residual Heat Removal

System (RNS) C/D controls

• All Chemical & Volume Control System (CVS) flow through gas

stripper

• Increased Permanently installed equipment

• Draw pressurizer steam bubble without refilling pressurizer

• Improve passive safety system S/D capabilities

49


AP1000 S/D and S/U Improvements

• S/D Emergency Operations Procedures (EOPs) and Technical

Specifications (TSs) and some auto ECCS actuation

• RNS to CVS Purification Flow

• Significantly improved mid-loop capabilities

• Vacuum refill of RCS

• AP1000 S/D and S/U Improvements

50


AP1000 Refueling Improvements

• Improved Refueling System I&C

• Advanced Main Control Room (MCR) displays support

enhanced refueling displays w/ great flexibility

• High-flow cavity Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System (SFS)

purification (filter / demineralize)

• Integrated head package

• Permanent refueling cavity seal

• Do NOT flood reactor cavity through RCS

51


Westinghouse is the Only Company Solely Focused on

Commercial Nuclear Technology

Nearly 50 percent of the nuclear power plants in operation worldwide,

and nearly 60 percent in the United States, are based on

Westinghouse technology

• Westinghouse is a full service OEM leading the nuclear power industry since

it started over 50 years ago.

• The AP1000 is the technology of choice for more than half of the new plants

planned in the U.S.

• The only certified Generation III+ technology

• First Generation III+ plants under construction in China and US

52


Focused on operating plant

success through reliable

operation, maximized power

output and better (shorter,

more predictable) outages

Specializing in

the technology

of new nuclear

power plants and

component

manufacturing

Westinghouse Electric Company Today

Nuclear Services Nuclear

Power Plants

Nuclear

Automation Instrumentation and

control solutions to

enhance the reliability of

nuclear plant control

and safety systems

A single-source

fuel provider for

PWR, BWR,

VVER, AGR and

Magnox reactors

worldwide

Nuclear Fuel

53


The Westinghouse Advantage

• Westinghouse businesses complement each other and enable us

to deliver our comprehensive services efficiently and effectively

for your benefit.

• AP1000 O&M advantages in our plant design are based on the

application of over 50 years of worldwide design, construction

and operations & maintenance experience.

54









55


AP1000 EPC Delivery Model

• Ensures employees and stakeholders have a clear

understanding of how Westinghouse will deliver the AP1000

plant on budget and schedule.

• Provides consistent delivery of AP1000 Projects meeting

customer and stakeholder requirements and exceeding

expectations.

• Consists of standard processes and procedures which are used

to deploy projects globally building on prior projects’ lessons

learned

• Project specific processes are developed or incorporated into the

existing processes as unique project conditions require

56


EPC Delivery Model-Project Plans

Project

Execution

Plan

Regulatory/

Licensing

Management

Plan

Contract/

Subcontract

Management

Plan

Configuration

Management

Plan

Resource

Staffing

Management

Plan

Communication

Plan

Standardization

Plan

Information

Management

System Plan

Project

Completion

& Closeout

Plan

Startup &

Commissioning

PlanSystem

Turnover

Plan

Schedule

Plan

Risk &

Opportunity

Management

Plan

Supply Chain/

Procurement

Plan

Construction

Execution

Plan

Process

Improvement /

Lessons

Learned Plan

Quality

Assurance

Plan

Module

Plan

EPC

AgreementProject

Controls

Plan

Project

EH&S Plan

Project

Engineering

Plan

Standard set of project plans built on prior project lessons.

57


AP1000 Standard Project Delivery System…

• Designed to meet Vietnam’s needs

• Adapted to reflect Vietnam-specific requirements

With…

• An integrated EPC Project Execution Plan, master schedule, and

project-specific procedures

• Cost certainty because of our commercial & project management

approach using advanced project management technologies

Rigorous project controls combined with collaborative risk-

sharing approach ensures firm control of project costs and

joint decision making

58


Westinghouse will create an integrated project management

team…

• Use key performance indicators

• Project control and risk management programs

• An Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) program

• A continuous improvement program

• A staffing and organizational program

• A dedicated function to ensure integration and alignment

Westinghouse will use the AP1000 Standard Delivery System and

Lessons Learned on Existing Projects to Develop the Project Delivery

Team in Vietnam

59


We will work with you for successful project completion…

• Shared understanding of

Vietnam’s Nuclear Power Plant

Project goals, values, and

behaviors

• A unified project organization

• Map all of the organization

functions to the project team

roles

• Prepare a detailed

implementation plan for each

function

60


Deliver on time, on budget with safety and quality paramount…

• Maintain a safety-conscious working environment.

• Successfully complete the AP1000 plants on schedule and within

budget.

• Comply with licensing requirements.

• Maintain high standards of quality for all of the work in

accordance with the contract

• Work for Owner satisfaction for the entire project duration.

• Maintain good relations between the project team and the owner.

• Maintain open communication among the project teams.

61


Deliver on time, on budget with safety and quality paramount…

• Routinely update the current estimate to complete.

• Address the cost impacts of any emerging issues and risks

quickly.

• Manage the work to the project schedules

• Monitor project earned value and schedule performance in

accordance with the EPC agreement.

• Provide best equipment delivery to support schedule

requirements.

62


AP1000TM Plant Scope of Work - Typical

EPC (Standard Plant) Site Specific (Outside Standard Plant)

Engineering and Procurement

Nuclear Island

Conventional/Turbine Island

Balance of Plant

Auxiliaries

Management Systems

Administrative and training facilities (including

simulator)

Low and Intermediate level waste processing

system

Start-up and commissioning support

Fuel (under separate contract)

Site Selection

Intake/Discharge Structure

Construction Power

Security

Transportation and Infrastructure Roads

Rail spurs

Docks/Wharfs/Channels (Marine Construction)

Heliport

Work villages/Warehouses/Offices

Grid & grid connections

Permanent structures, such as.:

• Water treatment plant

• Sewage treatment plant\

• Administration building

• Dry cask storage facility

• Permanent Security Building

Operators

Construction

Bulk Materials supply

Site Preparation

Civil Construction

Installation of Equipment

Temporary facilities

Construction Testing

63


Typical EPC Deliverables

Engineering Procurement Construction Commissioning &

Start-up

Operations & Maintenance

●Design Drawings

●Equipment

Specifications &

Documents

●I&C Specifications and

Documents

●Construction

Specifications &

Documents

●Installation

requirements &

guidelines

●Licensing & Start-up

Support

●Engineering Schedule

●Operator plant training

●Equipment

●I&C

●Procurement

Schedule

● Technical

Manuals

●Construction

Work

Packages

●Bulk

commodities

●Temporary

facilities

●Construction

consumables

●Construction

Labor

●Wage Rates

●Construction

schedule

●Turnover to

SU

●Test Program

●Test procedures,

●Test personnel

●Performance test

●Turnover Program to

operations

●Operators to support

Testing

●Plant engineering staff

●Operators

●Outage Optimization

●Switchyard/Grid Connection

●Site Maintenance

-------------------WEC------------------------- --------WEC-------------

------Constructors------ ------------------Owner-----------------------

PARTICIPATION

64


Division of Responsibilities (DOR)

• Prepare detailed Division of Responsibilities based on the selected Delivery Model

– Depicts the scope division and interfaces between Owner, Westinghouse and Constructors

• DOR Table of Contents

– Buildings

– Systems

– Structural Modules

– Equipment Modules

– Piping

– Containment Vessel Assembly & Construction

– Structural Module Assembly

– Commodities

– Site Infrastructure

– Pre-Op and Startup

– Programs

Clearly defines scope of work

and eliminates gaps.

65


Engineering Interface with Construction

Engineering

●Design Drawings

●Equipment

Specifications &

Documents

●I&C Specifications

and Documents

●Construction

Specifications &

Documents

●Instruction Manuals

●Licensing & Start-up

Support

●Engineering

Schedule

Construction

●Construction Work

Packages

●Construction Materials

●Local Labor

●Wage Rates

●Construction schedule

•Basic Design such as P&IDs, PFDs, SSDs

• General Arrangement Drawings, 3-D Model,

Piping ISOs, Pipe Stress Analysis

•I&C Logic Diagram

•Interface Specifications and Procedure

•Electrical, I&C Construction Documents

•Mechanical Module/Piping Construction

Documents

•Civil/Structural Module Construction Documents

•Major Equipment Specs and Drawings

•BoP Equipment Specs and Drawings

•I&C Equipment Specs and Drawings

•Field Engineering Support

- Standard plant design complete

- Focus of Engineering is on site-

specific modifications

66


Procurement Interface with Construction

Procurement

● Equipment

● I&C

● Requirements

Flowdown

● Procurement

Schedule

● Technical Manuals

● Quality Plans

Construction

● Construction Work

Packages

● Construction Materials

● Local Labor

● Wage Rates

● Construction schedule

● Bulk materials

● Commodities

● Design/build

subcontracts (i.e.

cooling towers,

switchyard)

•Procurement Schedule

•Equipment and I&C supply

•BOP Equipment Supply

•Mechanical Equipment Modules

•Piping

•Commodities supply

•Equipment Installation support

- Focus on delivery of components

from world-wide vendor base

- Drive for cost effective high quality

components

67


Project Controls

• Primavera Scheduling for construction activities

• Cost monitoring through coordination with schedule and SAP

accounting system

• Critical Path Schedule analysis to determine pinch points and

create recovery solutions

• Integrated project and organization risk management system

68


Project Controls

• Coordination with all business functions inside of Westinghouse

as well as with constructor

• Project managers follow Project Management Institute (PMI)

guidelines and training requirements.

• Financial milestones are monitored both at Project Controls and

Financing Business Functions.

An integrated system of processes, tools, and people to provide

pro-active management and oversight of project work scope.

69


Westinghouse New Plant Risk Management Program

• All activities involve risk

• Risk management is aligned with project objectives

• Westinghouse has a formal risk management organization

Risk management is an integral part of how we deliver projects,

consistently on-time and on-budget

70


Project Risk Management Lifecycle Processes

Feasibility Phase Development Phase Execution Phase

● Identify potential risks

● Respond to capture potential benefits and mitigate threats

● Perform early work activities to reduce uncertainty

● Prepare final Project Risk Management Plan

● Charter project risk team

● Continually identify, assess and respond to project risk

● Monitor and control project risk management activities and risk areas

● Document and incorporate lessons learned

A systematic and continuous model for managing and reducing uncertainty

in the successful execution of an AP1000 project

• Assign dedicated risk lead

• Prepare preliminary risk management plan

• Perform comprehensive execution risk assessment

• Incorporate lessons learned

• Incorporate response activities into plan

• Align and assess risk with proposed delivery model

71


Integration of Risk in Project Development

Project Execution

Plans

Scope,

Schedule, and

Cost

Uncertainties Cost Estimate

and Pricing

Project Risk

Assessment

and Analysis

Commercial

Terms and

Conditions

Customer Input

Risk Response

Planning

Standard

AP1000 Risk

Management

Standard

AP1000 Project

Models and

Lessons Learned

Scope and

Division of

Responsibility

Specific Project

and Local

Experience

Key inputs and resources

are used to ensure a

comprehensive and

relevant basis for the risk

management process

Risk management

processes identify and

assess project risks and

align project risk

response with the most

effective strategies

Risk

Management is

integrated and

aligned with

project delivery

72


AP1000TM Typical Construction Schedule

73


Integrated Master Schedule Design

Nuc Island Engr.

NIProcure.

Turb & BOPEngr

Site Procure.

Construction

AP1000 Projects Schedule Elements and Links

Site Spec.Engr

Pre-Ops

Testin

StartupTesting

FuelLoad

Prov. T.O.

6 Monthts

Links Color Legend

- Engr to Procurement

- Procure to Construction

- Engr to Engr.

- Engr to Construction

Construction Schedule

Site SpecConst

* Includes Site Development

Turb/BOPProcure.

74


Schedule Statistics

Files Activities

WEC Standard Plant Engineering 3 26353

Toshiba Standard Plant Engineering 1 2783

Constructor Standard Plant Engineering 2 19761

Constructor China Standard Plant Engineering 1 10559

WEC Standard Plant Procurement 2 9512

Constructor Standard Plant Procurement 2 5203

Module Fabrication / Assembly 5 9331

Standard Plant Construction/Start-up 2 12568

Site Specific 2 19165

Miscellaneous 9 6350

Total 29 121585

Note: Typical for single project, 2 Units

75


Project and Construction Management Summary

• Standard processes and procedures to deliver our projects globally

that are adjusted / modified as needed to address project specific

requirements.

• Demonstrated success delivering on schedule and on budget on the

China, VC Summer and Vogtle Projects

• Implementation of a robust lessons learned process ensures

minimizing similar mistakes on future projects and will improve the

project delivery efficiency

Our goal is consistent, reliable, cost effective delivery

of AP1000 plants meeting our customer expectations

76








Thank you very much!