war on land – the western front the western front was the most important for several reasons. ...

38
HOW WAS WORLD WAR 1 FOUGHT?

Upload: luke-marland

Post on 16-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

HOW WAS WORLD WAR 1 FOUGHT?

Page 2: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

War on land – the Western Front The Western Front was the most

important for several reasons.

Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for all four years.

The fighting on the Western front had a significant impact on ideas and attitudes.

Page 3: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Cross Section of a trench

Page 4: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

View from above

Page 5: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Why did trench warfare lead to a stalemate? In order to hold their positions

soldiers had to dig down to keep out of the line of fire.

These hastily dug ditches soon became permanent.

They evolved into complex defensive systems on both sides.

Page 6: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Casualties

Deadlier for attackers than defenders.

Why would this be the case?

What is ‘going over the top’?

Why did this lead to stalemate?

Page 7: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

War of Attrition

There was little change in the position of the front over the four years.

The aim of battles was not to win territory but to destroy the opposing army.

It was a war of attrition to break the morale of the enemy and reduce their numbers.

Page 9: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Study Section

The Christmas truce. Shell-shock. Trench foot. The work of miners tunneling

beneath the trenches. Communication systems used in the

trenches. Those who were shot for ‘cowardice’.

Page 10: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

How did the development of weaponry lead to a change in tactics on the Western Front? Both sides used a wide range of

weapons to try and break the deadlock.

The infantry charge was the key battle tactic used throughout the war.

Weapons were developed to make this strategy more effective.

Page 11: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Machine guns and rifles

Page 12: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Main types of guns…

Lee-Enfield rifle with bayonet attached – 25 rounds a minute could be fired.

600 rounds a minute could be fired.

Another WW1 innovation was the submachine gun known as a ‘trench sweeper’

Page 14: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Hand grenades

Small hand-thrown bombs.

The British used the pineapple shaped Mills bomb.

The Germans used stick-shaped grenades nicknamed ‘potato-mashers’

Page 15: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Heavy Artillery

Page 16: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

The real killer

In WW1 artillery inflicted 70% of all casualties.

The war was so static the guns could take up permanent positions.

Every major attack was preceded by a prolonged artillery barrage.

Page 17: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Problems with artillery

Not accurate enough to destroy enemy trenches.

It gave the enemy warning of an attack to come. (Battle of the Somme)

‘Creeping barrage’ and ‘artillery ambush’

Page 18: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Chemical Warfare

Page 19: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Poison Gas

Chlorine Gas was first used by the Germans.

Phosgene Gas 18x stronger.

Mustard Gas which burned, blinded and slowly killed victims over several weeks.

Gas masks were developed by scientists making gas as a weapon less effective.

Page 20: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Tanks

Page 21: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

WC’s???

The tank was not able to break the stalemate.

It was slow and unreliable and many tanks broke down before reaching the trenches.

Their armor plating was also not strong enough to resist artillery.

Battle of the Somme & Battle of Cambrai

Page 22: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

What was the importance of naval warfare in WWI? The control of the seas was crucial to

both sides.

GB was an island and needed food, industrial supplies and soldiers from other countries.

Germany also needed food and other supplies from overseas.

Page 23: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

GB rules the waves?

GB was successful in controlling the trade routes.

The Allies blockaded German ships.

GB enforced the search of neutral shipping and stopped them going to Germany.

Page 24: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Mines and Submarines

Page 25: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

U-Boats

The Germans used U-boats to try and enforce their own blockade on GB.

This proved to be politically dangerous warfare.

The Germans hope that unrestricted sub warfare would starve GB and France.

Page 26: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Why was GB able to survive the U-boat blockade? The convoy system was the turning

point.

As technology progressed depth charges and ‘listening devices’ helped to attack U-boats.

Improved sub. nets forced the U-boats to go north around GB made them less effective.

Page 27: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Convoy System

Page 28: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Battle of Jutland

Page 29: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Major Naval engagement

One major challenge to GB’s supremacy – 31 May-1 June 1916.

After several hours of exchanging artillery fire, the Germans sailed back to port.

GB lost 14 ships and Germany 11.

The result Germany had not destroyed GB’s fleet it was still in control of the surface waters.

Page 30: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Importance of naval supremacy GB’s navy was able to move 8.5

million troops across the British Empire.

Imports reached GB and they were able to maintain the blockade on Germany.

They were also able to sustain the convoy system and transport US troops and equipment for the final battles.

Page 31: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Zeppelins and airships

Page 32: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Airships and civilian targets The Germans had the Zepellin and

were able to bomb civilian targets in England.

The British used airships mainly for escorting ships and spotting U-boats.

They soon became easy targets and were replaced by bomber fleets later in the war.

Page 33: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

WWI Bombers

Page 34: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Bombing Raids

The German Gotha caused 3000 casualties in raids over London and SE England.

By 1918 GB was making raids into enemy territory – Mainz, Stuttgart and Mannheim.

The idea of attacking civilian targets had become a feature of war by 1918.

Page 35: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Aircraft-Reconnaissance

Pilots were able to report on troop concentrations and artillery movements.

Photographs of trench systems could be taken from the air.

Messages were dropped by aircraft and communication with the ground possible.

Page 36: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Red Baron and Micky Mannock

Page 37: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Dog-fights

At first pilots tried to attack each other with rifles and pistols.

By 1915 machine guns were fitted and synchronized to shoot through propeller.

Dog-fights became a common site over the trenches.

Page 38: War on land – the Western Front  The Western Front was the most important for several reasons.  Its size (320km) and the fact it was operational for

Potential of airpower

By 1918 there were more than 8000 aircraft on all sides.

Control of the skies over the battlefield had become essential for victory.

It was clear that bombing civilians affected enemy morale.

The end of WWI was still determined by what happened on the ground.

This was a sign of what was to come in 1939-45.