was there a common ancestor or a common designer?

69
Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Upload: jessie-roberts

Post on 15-Jan-2016

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Page 2: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Homology Examples

Page 3: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Homology “The human hand and the bat hand are

obviously—no sane person could deny it—two versions of the same thing. The technical term for this kind of sameness is ‘homology’. The bat’s flying wing and our grasping hand are ‘homologous’….

Page 4: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Homology …The hands of the shared ancestor—and

the rest of the skeleton—were taken and pulled, or compressed, part by part in different directions and by different amounts, along with descending lineages.”—Richard Dawkins, The Greatest Show on Earth, 288.

Page 5: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Homologous Structures

“Homologous resemblances are those inherited from the shared ancestor.”—Richard Dawkins, The Greatest Show on Earth, 313.

Page 6: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Homology = Circular Reasoning “If homology is defined as similarity due to

common descent, then it is circular reasoning to use it as evidence for common descent.”—Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution, 61-62

Page 7: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Richard Dawkins Concedes: “If we want to use homology as evidence for

the fact of evolution, we can’t use evolution to define it.”—Richard Dawkins, The Greatest Show on Earth, 313.

Dawkins has done this by

claiming that similar structures

are due to common ancestry.

Page 8: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

2 Types of Causes:

Intelligent: Unintelligent:

Page 9: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Convergent Evolution Similarities among living things result

from creatures adapting to common environments.

Page 10: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

“Analogous” Features “The word ‘analogous’ came to be used for

resemblances due to shared function, not ancestry.”—Richard Dawkins, The Greatest Show on Earth, 313.

Page 11: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Evolution Should Not Repeat Itself

“For just the same reason, it is vanishingly improbable that exactly the same evolutionary pathway should ever be traveled twice.”—Atheist Richard Dawkins in The Blind Watchmaker, 94

Page 12: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Evolutionist Explanation: Similar environmental problems, or

challenges, cause similar traits to emerge in unrelated creatures.

Problem: This explanation does not account for all examples of repeating designs.

Page 13: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Problems with Repeated Designs for Evolution:

• Too frequent• Many common designs are complex• Common designs occur under different

conditions

Page 14: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Common Design Examples:

Animal body parts Animal behaviors Amino Acids Molecular motors and machines Natural Geometry

Page 15: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Animal Body Parts

Page 16: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Common Designs in the Chamelon and the Sandlance:

Common Designs in the Chamelon and the Sandlance:

Page 17: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

The Chameleon and the Sandlance:

The chameleon is a reptile and the sandlance is a fish.

These creatures live in completely different environments, but they are still similar.

Both move their eyes independent of one another in a jerky manner, rather than together.

Page 18: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

The Chameleon and the Sandlance:

While one eye is in motion the other eye is motionless. 

Both animals use the cornea of the eye to focus on objects. 

All other reptiles and fish use the lens of the eye to focus images on the retina.

Page 19: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

The Chameleon and the Sandlance:

Both have skin coverings over their eyes to prevent them from being obvious to both predators and prey. 

Both have the same kind of tongue and the same kind of tongue-launching method for catching food.

Page 20: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

“When faced with a beautifully coordinated optical system such as this, it is a challenge to provide an explanation for the convergence of so many different finely-tuned mechanisms”—J. D. Pettigrew and S. P. Collin, “Terrestrial Optics in an Aquatic Eye: The Sandlance, Limnichthytes fasciatus (Creediidae, Teleostei),” in Journal of Comparative Physiology A 177 (1995): 397-408

Page 21: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Common Designs in the Brains of Hummingbirds, Songbirds,

and Parrots: Hummingbirds, Songbirds, and Parrots all

have seven forebrain structures which are used for vocal learning and producing songs.

Page 22: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Scientists consider this similarity surprising since “…songbirds, parrots, and hummingbirds are thought to have evolved vocal learning and associated brain structures independently.”—Erich D. Jarvis et al., “Behaviorally Driven Gene Expression Reveals Song Nuclei in Hummingbird Brain,” Nature 406 (2000): 628-32.

Page 23: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Convergence in the Fossil Record How can scientists be certain that the

similarities they observe among fossils are not merely products of convergent evolution?

Page 24: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Animal Behavior

Page 25: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Echolocation:

Some bats use echolocation to navigate while they fly.

These bats send out high frequency pulsing sounds in a narrow directed beam from their mouths or noses, which bounce off of objects in front of the bats.

Page 26: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Bat Echolocation Continued: The bats then receive mental image-

producing echoes of objects in front of them.

Scientists think this navigation system is so precise that the echoes generate an image in a bat’s mind of its surrounding environment that borders on the resolution of a visual image.

Page 27: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Toothed Whales Use Echolocation:

Toothed whales also use echolocation to determine the size, shape, speed, distance, direction and density of objects in the water.

Page 28: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

This common design of echolocation cannot be explained completely by similar environmental pressures, because bats and whales live in very different environments.

Page 29: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Amino Acids

Page 30: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Colobine Monkeys’ Amino Acid Sequence

The amino acid sequences of the gene in the Asian Colobine monkeys perfectly matched the amino acid sequence for the enzyme gene in the African Colobine monkeys.

Page 31: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Colobine Monkeys’ Amino Acid Sequence

Ann Arbor relates that Zhang stated: “Indeed, we found three amino acid changes that were identical in the two lineages. They occurred independently, but they were identical.”

—Ann Arbor, “Parallel Evolution: Proteins Do It, Too,” University of Michigan

Page 32: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Motors and Machines

Page 33: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Molecular Motors Inside the Cell There are two main types:

Rotary Linear

Page 34: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

A Rotary Motor:

Page 35: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Bacterial Flagellum Motor (Rotary):

                 

Page 36: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Bacteria Flagellum Motor Consists of:

A drive shaft A rotor A hook A stator A bushing Other parts

Page 37: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Archaea Motor (Rotary): The basic flagella motor unit allegedly

arose independently in bacteria and Archaea.

Although there are many differences between the two devices, each device still rotates a flagellum.

Page 38: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Linear Motors: Evolutionists believe that a combination of

things evolved multiple times independently: 1) molecular motors in general 2) “walking” ability

Page 39: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Linear Motors “Walking” Inside the Cell:

Page 40: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Natural Geometry

Page 41: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Spirals Spirals are present at all size levels in both

living and non-living things.

Page 42: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Shelled Protozoan A microscopic foraminiferan, or a shelled

protozoan, is in a spiral shape.

Page 43: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Leaf Patterns: Phyllotaxis Phyllotaxis is a phenomenon that occurs in

80% of plant species in which leaves are arranged in a spiral formation up plant stems.

Page 44: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Leaf Patterns: Phyllotaxis Each leaf is positioned above the one

below it by a constant angle.

Page 45: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Sunflower Heads One sunflower head contains both

clockwise and counterclockwise spirals.

Page 46: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Sunflower Heads Mario Livio explains that there are usually

“…thirty-four spirals going one way and fifty-five the other.”—Mario Livio, The Golden Ratio, 112.

Page 47: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Philip Ball Writes: “…A closer investigation of phyllotactic

patterns reveals that there must be more here than Darwinian selection from a random pool of possibilities.”—The Self-Made Tapestry, 105.

Page 48: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Philip Ball Also Writes: “Phyllotaxis therefore, contains a hidden

mathematical pattern for which we are unlikely to find an explanation by rooting around in the genetics of plant developmental biology. It seems likely that there is some more universal basis to these observations.” —The Self-Made Tapestry, 107.

Page 49: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Seashells

Page 50: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Hurricanes

Page 51: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Spiral Galaxies

Page 52: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Page 53: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Conclusion No known evolutionary mechanism can

account for all of the common designs throughout nature.

Repeated designs have been extremely frequent, these designs have involved very complex structures, and have occurred in situations in which the forces of natural selection have been vastly different. 

Page 54: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Conclusion All of the common designs fit perfectly

well with the belief in a Creator who used the same good designs repeatedly in unrelated creatures and objects.

Page 55: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Questions

Page 56: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Human Evolution? Evolutionists call the alleged “missing

links” hominids. However, from the Creation perspective,

these were not “missing links” but were merely creatures that God created that later went extinct.

Page 57: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Human Evolution Continued: Homo sapiens, or sometimes Homo

sapiens sapiens, refer to humans who physically identical to humans today.

Evolutionists do not know how humans evolved.

The standard theory of human evolution that is presented in textbooks is outdated.

Page 58: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Human Evolution Continued: Steven Jones, a professor of genetics at the

University College London, writes: “In spite of a century’s claims of the discovery of ‘missing links,’ it is quite possible that no bone yet found is on the direct genetic line to ourselves.”

Page 59: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Humans are Not Related to Homo Erectus:

Frank Huffman, an anthropologist at the University of Texas said, “There's good evidence to place Homo erectus and modern humans together in time, but not necessarily spatially together.”

Page 60: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Humans are Not Related to Homo Erectus:

Authors of an article in the journal called Science wrote, “The new ages raise the possibility that H. erectus overlapped in time with anatomically modern humans (H. sapiens) in Southeast Asia.”

Page 61: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Humans are Not Related to Homo Erectus:

Kenneth Mowbray, a paleoanthropologist at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City, said, "There's no way modern humans could be direct descendants of Homo erectus."

"The dating is tricky, but the Java material suggests that H. sapiens and H. erectus overlapped in time. H. erectus can't stay the same and be an ancestor at the same time."

Page 62: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Humans Did Not Evolve from Neanderthals, or Neandertals:

“During the late Pleistocene, early anatomically modern humans coexisted in Europe with the anatomically archaic Neandertals for some thousand years.”

Page 63: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Dr. Fazala Rana Sums Up the Situation Well:

“Paleontologists now have definitive evidence that Homo erectus and Neanderthals, long regarded as central figures in the human origin sequence, were evolutionary side branches and dead ends.

Neither Neanderthals nor Homo erectus made genetic (thus evolutionary) contributions to modern humans.”

Page 64: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Isn’t the DNA of Humans and Chimps 98% Identical?

The genetic similarities between chimpanzees and humans would just as easily be explained by a Creator using the same building blocks and designs to make different creatures.

More recent research from the year 2003 indicates that humans are only 86.7 percent genetically similar to chimpanzees.

Page 65: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

What About Hurricanes? Hurricanes are necessary for life to exist on

Earth. Even more suffering and pain would result if hurricanes never occurred.

Wind velocities are controlled by Earth’s rotation rate.

Humanity appeared on Earth when the rotation speed had decreased to 24 hours a day. This means humans also arrived on Earth at the ideal time when weather and temperature conditions would be most suitable for them.

Page 66: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Hurricanes Continued: Hurricanes also serve positive functions.

Hurricanes significantly add to the amount of chlorophyll concentrations found along continental shelves.

This process benefits the creatures that live on the continental shelves.

Page 67: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Hurricanes Continued:

Hurricanes also lift huge amounts of sea-salt aerosols out of the oceans, and these aerosols compose a large quantity of clouds, and play a crucial role in forming raindrops.

Consequently, sufficient rain falls to support life.

Page 68: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

Hurricanes Continued: Hurricanes also function as Earth’s thermostat.

For example, when tropical oceans become too hot, they create hurricanes.

The sea-salt aerosols made by hurricanes cool the tropical oceans to a better temperature.[1] This cooling prevents some sea creatures from going extinct.

All of these things indicate that a greater Intelligence invested a considerable amount of planning when creating the Earth.

Page 69: Was There a Common Ancestor or a Common Designer?

What about Injuries and Deaths Caused by Hurricanes?

It is possible that Satan could still use the forces of nature to inflict harm on humanity, as he reportedly did to Job’s family when he used strong wind to cause a house to collapse (Job 1:19).

After all, Satan uses other aspects of God’s good creation to cause suffering.