washing-up and movement of litter along the fuji coast ... · 4. beach clean-up efforts the litter...
TRANSCRIPT
Fig.1 Fuji coast
WASHING-UP AND MOVEMENT OF LITTER ALONG THE FUJI
COAST CAPTURED BY LIVE-CAMERA
Masahiro Ito, Department of Environmental Science and Technology, Meijo University [email protected]
Abstract
The total amount of litter washed up along the Japanese coast approaches nearly 25,000
tons (150,000m3). In this study, we discuss the process and timing of the deposition of
litter from the sea surface onto a beach by large waves using images from live cameras
located along the Fuji coast. Live camera images recorded over a period of 14 months from
September 2007 to November 2008 were used in this study in addition to records of wave
height, wave period, wind direction, wind velocity, and tide level. Analysis of these images
and relevant oceanographic data showed that: (1) the floating litter on the sea surface in the
nearshore area was washed up on the sandy beach by long waves caused by typhoons, (2)
on the specified day the wind drifted the litter floating on the sea towards the shore, (3) the
tidal change did not contribute to deposition of litter on the beach and (4) the clean up of litter
was carried out by the appropriate section of the prefecture and city, and required a period in
1 to 5 months per event.
Key words: Drifting litter, live camera, washing-up of floating litter, Fuji coast.
1. Introduction
Along a beautiful 20 km stretch of the Fuji coast in Japan (Fig.1), between the Fiji and Kano
river mouths, large amounts of litter are washed up on occasion by swells generated by the
passage of typhoons or low pressure systems. The origin and route of this washed up litter are
surmised as follows: When heavy rain caused by a typhoon falls and extreme weather in the
upper and middle areas of a river catchment occurs, mountain-slope landslides occasionally
result. The fallen trees from such an event
flow down the river as driftwood. In addition,
trash from the towns within the river
catchment may also flow from the river
mouth into the sea. This floating litter is
carried by wind and waves and washed up
on another shore further along the coast
from the river mouth. This may result in
beautiful coastal areas, including
recreational beaches, becoming inundated
with this refuse if it is not removed.
Countermeasures against the accumulation
of litter must therefore be considered. One
such measure, the Coast Litter Disposal
Promoting Law, was promulgated on July
15, 2009, in Japan. There is currently very
Littoral 2010, 12009 (2011) DOI:10.1051/litt/201112009 © Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2011
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License 3.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any noncommercial medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article available at http://coastnet-littoral2010.edpsciences.org or http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/litt/201112009
little information on the timing and
processes by which floating litter
is washed up on the coast. An
understanding of the process of
litter deposition is useful in the
discussion of possible
countermeasures. In this study,
we discuss the effects of the sea
and weather conditions on litter
deposition based on live camera
images and records of wave
height, wave period, wind
direction, wind velocity, and tide
level.
2. Study site
The Fuji coast is located in the inner part of Suruga Bay, and sited between the mouths of the
Fuji and Kano rivers as shown in Figs. 1 and 2. The length of the coast is about 20 km. The
shoreline slope, as measured at the intersection of the mean sea water level and the cross-
shore beach section, ranges from 1/3 to 1/10. Waves during storm events were measured at
the nearby Shimizu Wave Observatory Station (Fig. 2) during 2007, and over the duration of
this study can be described as follows: significant the wave height H1/3 was 5 m and the
wave period T1/3 was 13.6 s. The incident wave direction is from SW to SSW, and the angle
of wave incidence to the shoreline is approximately 90º. The dominant direction of strong
winds is SW throughout the year.
3. Data collection
Twelve live cameras located along the coastal dike shown in Fig. 2 are operated by the
Numazu Construction Office of the Chubu Branch, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport
and Tourism1) in order to aid the preservation of the Fuji coast. The beach and wave run up
conditions recorded by these cameras can be viewed on the Internet every five to eight
minutes. The live camera images provide a lot of information about phenomena that are occur on
Fig .2 Locations of live cameras along the Fuji coast, as well as the wave and weather observation stations used in this study.
Fig. 3 Litter deposited on the beach captured by a live camera at Senbon-hama station.
Image processing was performed in order to improve the recognition of litter.
Littoral 2010
12009-p.2
the coast. We saved these images captured from the cameras over 14 months (September 2007
to November 2008) to a personal computer in order to observe the deposition of litter. The
presence of litter can be visually assessed from these images. The litter on the beach is
easily recognized after image processing with a personal computer (see Fig. 3). This image
was processed to show the washed up litter in black using Adobe Photoshop Ver.6.
3.1 Identification of washed up
Fig. 4 shows two images captured by the live camera at Senbon-hama. While no litter was
present in the image taken on May 10 (Fig. 4a), litter was washed up on May 13 (Fig. 4b).
(a) May 10, 2008 (b) May 13, 2008
Fig.4 Litter washed up on Senbon-hama beach captured by live camera. Image (b) was taken on
May 13, 2008, after Typhoon No. 0802 passed far to the south of this coastline.
Table 1 Existence of litter on each beach on the basis of images captured via live cameras.
Littoral 2010
12009-p.3
The direction and angle of the live camera are fixed, and the live camera image is
considerably affected by weather conditions such as rain and the angle of sunlight. In bad
weather, the presence of litter on the beach could not be assessed using the images. Table 1
summarizes the results for the existence of litter on each beach using the images captured
by six live cameras. “Circle-mark” indicates where considerable amounts of litter
accumulated; “triangle-mark” indicates where less litter accumulated; “blank” indicates where
litter could not be recognized in the image; and “X” indicates when the assessment to the
image that were captured due to bad weather conditions is impossible, in the term of May 9-
14. Table 1 shows that litter did not accumulate until May 10 (light gray) and was clearly
recognized by five of the six live cameras after May 13 (dark gray). The litter was likely
washed up as a result of the strong waves impacting the Fuji coast at this time. On May 11, a
frontal cyclone and low-pressure system passed in an easterly direction over the Izu Islands
and sea to the south. On May 12-13, Typhoon No. 0802 passed in a northwesterly direction
over the sea to the south of the Fuji coast. In addition, there was heavy rainfall (30-50
mm/day) in the Kano River catchment for five days between May 1-13. This rainfall likely
resulted in the transport of wood from mountainous areas and anthropogenic litter from the
urban areas in the catchment flow the river into Suruga Bay.
3.2 Monthly change in the distribution of washed up litter
Fig 5 Time history of litter deposition captured by live cameras at six locations, and corresponding wave parameters. The symbols in the figure are as follows: “Inverse triangle” Indicates cleanup days.
(1)Typhoon No. 0709 struck the Izu Peninsula in Sizuoka Prefecture on September 6 2007, and moved from south to north over the main island of Japan. Rainfall of 595 mm/day was observed in the Kano River basin. Fuji City recorded a maximum wind velocity of 13 m/s.
(2)Typhoon No.0802 passed over the sea in the south of the Izu Peninsula. (3)Typhoon No.0807 was generated on July 14 2008. The seasonal rain front moved slowly east and thunderstorms
occurred between west and east of Japan on July 18. A large amount of washed up litter was recognized in the live camera images.
(4)Typhoon No.0811 migrated south of Hachijo-jima, and waves of H1/3=1.1 m and T1/3=9.0 s were generated. (5)Typhoon No.0813 moved south of the main island, and waves of H1/3=1.9m and T1/3=10.5 s were generated.
Littoral 2010
12009-p.4
The presence or absence of litter on the beach was assessed using live camera images
captured over 14 months (September 2007 to November 2008). Six live cameras were used
in this study: Senbon-hama, Nishikanmon, Osuwa, Otsuka, Syowa second drainage channel,
and Momosato, near the Kano River mouth (Fig. 5). In addition, the presence of litter is
shown as a horizontal bar and the times when beach clean-up work was undertaken and
captured by the cameras is shown by an inverted triangle. Days when litter was concurrently
recognized by different live cameras are shown by the vertical lines numbered (1) to (5).
Also, times series of the significant wave height and period of incident waves are illustrated
using the wave records from the Shimizu Wave Observation Station2). Vertical lines (1) and
(2) coincide with an extreme wave events and indicate the beginning of litter deposition.
Lines (3) to (5) indicate that the timing of litter deposition is the same across the some
locations. This deposited litter photographed by the live cameras is assumed to have originated
from the Kano River mouth.
In Section 5 below, we closely examine the effect of incident waves, wind speed and
direction, and tidal level on litter deposition for the period May 9-17, 2008.
4. Beach clean-up efforts
The litter in this area was periodically cleaned-up by volunteer groups with the support of
Numazu City. In addition, members of the community and elementary and junior high school
students occasionally assisted in the clean-up. The inverse triangles in Fig. 5 mark the dates
when persons involved in clean-up work were observed in the captured images. The clean-
up work, which requires a period of 1 to 5 months per event, was conducted frequently when
litter was washed up.
5. Influence of sea and wave climates
The records of significant wave height, period, wind speed and direction, and tidal level for
May 9-17 2008 are shown in Fig. 6. The waves and tidal levels were observed by the
Shimizu Wave Observation Station2), and the wind direction and velocity were observed by
the Fuji Weather Station located approximately 17 km northwest of the study site. The two
vertical broken lines in Fig. 6 show the final day on which litter was not recognised and the day
on which litter was recognised in five live camera images. The days on which litter was first
recognised were the morning of May 10 and the afternoon of May 13, respectively.
The Kano River basin experienced considerable precipitation over the period of May 11-13
due to the influence of a low pressure system and Typhoon No. 0802 passing over the sea to
the south. Thus, we assume that any wood in the washed-up litter was transported via the
Kano River mouth to the sea by the associated floodwaters. The wind on May 13 changed
direction from being westerly to a northerly between the morning and the afternoon, and it is
likely that the strong winds (7 m/s) first pushed the floating litter from the Kano River mouth
offshore, and then back onshore once the wind direction changed. On May 13 (Fig. 6), the
Fuji coast was impacted swells generated by this typhoon, with a peak in wave activity
observed in the morning. We conclude that this strong swell washed the floating litter up on
the coast
Littoral 2010
12009-p.5
Fig. 6 Time series of wave height and period, wind velocity and direction, and water level from May 9-17, 2008.
6. Effect of wind velocity and direction
The wind direction was divided into 16 segments in a clockwise direction, where 1 and 17
correspond to north, 5 to east, 9 to south, and 13 to west. Time series of wind velocity and
direction are illustrated in Fig. 6, and times when the wind blew from the sea towards the
coast are marked in grey. These wind data were collected by the Fuji Weather Station. From
this figure, we infer that when the wind blew towards the shore on May 11-12, the floating
litter on the sea surface drifted towards the shore and was subsequently washed up on the
coast by the strong swells.
Since there are no meteorological stations located in the immediate vicinity of the Fuji coast, we
used wind data collected by the Fuji and Mishima Wind Stations. As shown in Fig. 2, the Fuji and
Mishima Wind Stations3) are located approximately 17 km to the northwest and 7.3 km to the east
of the Fuji coast, respectively. To examine the effect of wind velocity and direction in this study we
Littoral 2010
12009-p.6
used the wind blowing distance that is
defined as the product of wind velocity
and the wind blowing time. The wind
blowing time expresses the time in
which the wind of some speeds blew
and expresses the relative distance
over which the wind blows the litter.
The integrated wind blowing
distance was calculated over the
period May 8-13 using wind data
measured at both the Fuji and
Mishima Weather Stations.
The wind data at the two weather
stations is useful for examining how the migration route of the typhoon or low pressure
influences the drift-route of the floating litter. The integrated wind blowing distance results are
shown in Fig. 7 in an Eulerian format with May 8 as the origin. The small circle indicates
08:00 May 10 and the large circle 16:00 May 13. The approximate position of the shoreline in
the study area is illustrated by the dotted line. This figure shows the relative effect of the wind
on the floating litter. Using the data from the Fuji Weather Station, the integrated wind
blowing distance moves in a NE direction (upper right in Fig.7) from May 8 (origin) to May 10.
In the period of May 10-13, the litter moves parallel to the shoreline. For the Mishima wind
data, the integrated wind blowing distance was similar to that obtained for Fuji until May 10,
with movement from the origin to the NE direction (upper right in this figure). However, after
May 10 the litter would have likely drifted offshore.
The integrated wind blowing distance determined using the data from two wind stations is similar until May 10. For May 10-13, the integrated wind blowing distance using data from the Fuji wind station shows that the floating litter likely drifts from the Kano River mouth to Senbon-hama, before moving parallel to the shoreline close to shore. However, the data from Mishima does not corroborate this finding. Thus, the use of the Fuji Wind Station data indicates the drift of the floating litter from the sea towards the shore.
However, it is important that the effect of wind on the floating litter be examined using
various data sources in cases of high waves or storm surges associated with typhoons directly
impacting the Fuji coast.
7. Effect of Tides on Washing up Litter Deposition
The tidal level during the event of interest ranged between -70 and +50 cm relative to the
mean sea level (Fig. 6). An abnormal water level change due to the storm surge in response
to Typhoon No. 0802 was not identified from the tidal level changes according to the lunar
cycle. The tidal level decreased gradually from 00:00 on May 13 to the time when the image
was captured (16:37-16:42 pm), and in this period the incident wave period peaked (swell
waves) and returned to normal. Consequently, the effect of water level variation on the
deposition of litter is not discussed quantitatively or in detail for the period examined in this
study.
Fig.7 Relative Eulerian description of transportation of floating litter
by wind.
Littoral 2010
12009-p.7
8. Conclusions
The results of this study on the process and timing of the deposition of litter on the Fuji coast
can be summarized as follows:
1) The integrated wind blowing distance was calculated for the period of May 8-13, 2008,
using wind data obtained by the Fuji Weather Station. The results indicate that the wind
likely pushes the floating litter towards the shore. Litter floating on the sea surface is
therefore considerably affected by the prevailing wind speed and direction.
2) The integrated wind blowing distance calculated using data from the Mishima Weather
Station located approximately 7.3 km to the east of the Fuji coast, does not adequately
explain the drift of litter on the sea during the period of strong swells from May 10-13.
3) The passage of Typhoon No. 0802 over the Pacific Ocean south of Suruga Bay produced
strong swells, in the order of H1/3=1.5 m and T1/3=16 s, on the Fuji coast. We consider
that this large swell washed the litter floating near the shore onto the beach.
4) The litter clean-up efforts require between 1-5 months per event under current cleaning
practices.
5) Tidal level variations did not influence the deposition of litter in the period examined in this
study.
References
1) Live camera website at the Numazu Construction Office, Chubu Branch, the Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan: https://www2.cbr.mlit.go.jp/numazu/ cgi-bin/makeCamSelectPage.cgi?area=1&kind=0# (Accessed Oct.30, 2010)
2) NOWPHAS (Nationwide Ocean Wave information network for Ports and HArbourS) website:
http://nowphas.mlit.go.jp/eng.htm (Accessed Oct.31, 2010)l 3) Japan Meteorological Agency website: Data on tide, Wind direction and velocity,
http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/indexe.html (Accessed Oct.29, 2010)
Littoral 2010
12009-p.8