washington state attorney general’s office april 2010 timothy d. ford open government ombudsman...

32
Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for

Upload: evelyn-higgins

Post on 16-Dec-2015

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Washington State Attorney

General’s Office

April 2010

Timothy D. Ford

Open Government Ombudsman

Assistant Attorney General for Government

Accountability

Page 2: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Ombudsman Position Created by AG Rob McKenna

Provides Assistance to the Public and Agencies

Training on Compliance with the Public Records Act and Open Public Meetings Act

Provides Informal Advice Letters interpreting those Laws

Advocates for Greater Transparency and Governmental Accountability

Promotes Legislative Reform & serves on the Sunshine Committee

Contact info: [email protected] or (360) 586-4802

2

Page 3: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Learn and Discuss the following:1. Purpose & history of the Public Records Act2. What is a “public record”?3. General agency obligations under the PRA4. Valid requests and agency initial responses5. Exemptions and how they apply6. Managing disclosure, fees7. Review of denials and agency liability8. Attorney General’s model rules9. Recent case law & legislative updates10.Tips and Resources

3

Page 4: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

The People do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them.

They do not give public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know.

Remain informed so they may maintain control over the instruments they have created.

4

Page 5: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Passed in 1972 as part of Public Disclosure Initiative (I-276) with a voter approval of 72%

All public records must be disclosed unless there is a statutory exemption

Only 10 exemptions in I-276; now over 300 exemptions exist throughout RCW’s

5

Page 6: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

RCW 42.456.010(2): 1. Any writing 2. which contains information relating to

the conduct of government or the performance of any governmental or propriety function

3. prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics.

Concerned Ratepayers Ass’n v. PUD No. 1, 138 Wn.2d 950 (1999).

6

Page 7: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photographing, and every other means of recording any form of communication or representation, including, but not limited to, letters, words, pictures, sounds, or symbols, or combination thereof, and all papers, maps, magnetic or paper tapes, photographic films and prints, motion picture, film and video recordings, magnetic or punched cards, discs, drums, diskettes, sound recordings, and other documents including existing data compilations from which information may be obtained or translated.

7

Page 8: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Paper records, photos, videos, emails, other electronic records

O’Neill v. City of Shoreline, 145 Wn. App. 913 (2008). (accepted for review by Supremes) Personal email account “Metadata” specifically requested Retention and a “thorough search”

Records have a “basic character” AGO 1980 No. 1; See also, Lindeman v.

Kelso School Dist. No. 458, 162 Wn.2d 196 (2007).

8

Page 9: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Appoint a public records officer with responsibility to: Be a point of contact for the public Ensure an agency’s compliance with the PRA

May be a public records officer from another agency

Name and contact information must be published: State agencies – in State Register with Code Reviser Local agencies – in a way reasonably calculated to

provide notice to the public (including place of business, internet, and other publications)

9

Page 10: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Duty to Publish – RCW 42.56.040Describe agency organizationAgency operations, proceduresProcedural and substantive rulesHow to submit requests for information

and copies

A person may not be “adversely affected” or required to resort to a matter (required to be published) that is not published

10

Page 11: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Records must be available for inspection and copying during customary business hours

Agencies shall adopt reasonable rules to: Provide full public access to public records Protect public records from damage or

disorganization Prevent excessive interference with other

essential functions Provide fullest assistance to requester, and

most timely possible action Parmelee v. Clarke, 147 Wn. App. 1035

(2009)

11

Page 12: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Provide an index of agency recordsFinal adjudication ordersAdopted policies and interpretationsAdministrative manuals and instructionsPlanning policies, goals, and decisionsFactual reports and studiesAgency determinations of rights and

responsibilities

Local government may waive index requirement if unduly burdensome

12

Page 13: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

No official format for a valid request. Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wn.2d 439 (2004). Agency forms should be encouraged, but are not required.

Request must be for “identifiable” records Not a request for general information. Bonamy v. City

of Seattle, 92 Wn. App. 403, 410 (1998) No duty to create records. Smith v. Okanogan County,

100 Wn. App. 7, 14 (2000) AG’s Model Rules: Identifiable = “reasonably locate”.

WAC 44-14-04002

Agencies may not distinguish between requesters, or require the purpose of a request Exception: An agency is prohibited from disclosing

lists of individuals for commercial purposes. See AGO 1975 No 15

13

Page 14: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Within five (5) business days an agency must:

1. Provide the record(s), or

2. Acknowledge receipt of request and provide reasonable estimate of response time, or

3. Deny the request and explain why, or

4. Seek clarification.

14

Page 15: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Time to fully respond to request. Assemble and review records

An agency must conduct an objectively reasonable search for responsive records. WAC 44-14-04003(9)

Notify Third PartiesNotice should be provided early, only if arguably exempt, and specify a date for disclosure. WAC 44-14-04003(11)

Redact exempt informationFor electronic records such as data bases, an agency can sometimes redact a field of exempt information by excluding it from the set of fields to be copied. WAC 44-14-04004(4)(b)(i)

Create a withholding index. WAC 44-14-04004(4)(b)(ii)

“An agency should not use the same estimate for every request”. WAC 44-14-04003(6)

Based on complexity and number of requests, agency resources, and other agency essential functions.

15

Page 16: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

“[A]n agency should briefly explain to the requestor the basis for the estimate in the initial response”. WAC 44-14-04003(6).

Explain the need to revise an estimate. Routine extensions with little or no action show that previous estimates probably were not “reasonable”. WAC 44-14-04003(6)

Violante v. King County Fire Dist. No 20, 114 Wn. App. 565 (2002). Request for a copy of 2001 budget. 1st request (4/18/2001) - ignored. 2nd request (4/27/2001) - 14 day estimate for production.  3rd request (5/18/2001) - $$ amount provided, no budget. 4th request (5/25/2001) - No response.    Lawsuit filed (6/21/2001) - Disclosure (8/3/2001)

Viewed objectively the lawsuit was necessary to obtain records. Plaintiff awarded costs and penalties for delay.

16

Page 17: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Based on a statutory exemption. Agencies must provide a withholding log

Construe exemptions narrowly Redact exempt information and disclose

non-exempt information Exemptions exist in the PRA and other

laws If a conflict exists between the PRA and

any other law, the PRA shall govern

17

Page 18: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Personal information in files maintained for clients of public institutions. RCW 42.56.230(1).

Personal information in files maintained for employees, if private. RCW 42.56.230(2).

Preliminary drafts or recommendations in which opinions are expressed or policies formulated

Attorney advice or work. (Peanut allergy case) Other exemptions in law (FERPA, Trade Secrets Act,

HIPAA & health care information, etc.)

18

Page 19: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

No general privacy exemption. See AGO 1988 No 12 Privacy must be incorporated into an element of a specific

exemption. For example: Personal information in files maintained for employees, if private. RCW 42.56.230(2).

Privacy is invaded if disclosure is 1) Highly offensive to a reasonable person; AND 2) not of legitimate concern to the public. RCW 42.56.255.

Tiberino v. Spokane County, 103 Wn. App. 680 (2000) Excessive personal emails - employee discharged Emails an exhibit for legal defense in lawsuit Email usage a public record but exempt (violates

privacy) Check your agency computer/email policy! Dawson v. Daly, 120 Wn.2d 782 (1993) Performance

evaluations, with no misconduct, are private

19

Page 20: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Rental Housing Association of Puget Sound v. City of Des Moines, 165 Wn.2d 525 (2009).

Log allows requester to make a “threshold determination” of whether the claimed exemption is proper

Log should identify: type of record, date, pages, author, recipients, statutory exemption and brief explanation. WAC 44-14-04004(4)(b)(ii)

No log? – Statute of Limitation unenforceable

20

Page 21: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Records must be available during customary business hours

Zink v. City of Mesa, 140 Wn. App. 328 (2007) City of Mesa – Population of 440 172 requests over 2.5 years; City limited its hours Administrative difficulty does not excuse strict

compliance Copies may be provided in batches 10% Deposit may be charged for copy costs AG’s Model Rules:

Document compliance in a closing letter and retain copies provided. WAC 44-14-04006

21

Page 22: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Agencies should develop, store, manage, and make public records widely available electronically. RCW 43.105.250.

Agencies should provide electronic records in an electronic format when requested. Use a commercially available format or translatable format. WAC 44-14-05001; Mechling v. City of Monroe, 152 Wn. App. 830, 849 (2009).

An agency may charge for electronic copies but costs are de-minimus. Actual staff time for scanning may be charged if determined pursuant to RCW 42.56.070(7).

Agencies are encouraged to send a scanning/copying project to an outside vendor if quicker and less expensive. WAC 44-14-07001(5)

Moore v. DOC

22

Page 23: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

No inspection or search fees Copying fees may not exceed 15 cents per page

unless an agency determines its actual costs. Actual costs are directly related to copying and shipping and may include staff time

Electronic copies cost practically nothing Scanning paper copies into electronic copies is

an actual cost to an agency for its staff time AG’s Model Rules: Agencies are encouraged to

compare their scanning and other copying charges to the rates of outside vendors. WAC 44-14-07003

23

Page 24: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Retain records until request is resolved. RCW 42.56.100

Agencies shall review denials, and review is deemed complete after two business days. RCW 42.56.520

Attorney General shall provide opinion of state agency denials when requested. RCW 42.56.530

AG Open Government Ombudsman provides technical assistance to public for access to public records and meetings

Citizen lawsuit may be filed in court within 1 year of denial or last production. RCW 42.56.550

24

Page 25: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Agency has the burden of proof. Payment of court costs and attorney fees. RCW 42.56.550.

Payment of mandatory penalties: $5 to $100 a day for each day the record inspection

was delayed or denied Yousoufian v. King County, 165 Wn.2d 439 (2009)

(withdrawn) Factors which “may” determine penalty range include:

Clarity of request and an agency follow-up Training and supervisions of personnel Agency systems to track and retrieve records Strict compliance with PRA procedural requirements Reasonableness of explanation

25

Page 26: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Mechling v. City of Monroe, 152 Wn. App. 830, 849 (2009). “Consistent with the statutory duty to provide the fullest assistance and the model rules . . .”. Remand to determine if it is reasonable and feasible to provide copies in an electronic format. WAC 44-14-05001.

Koenig v. Pierce County, 151 Wn. App. 221, 223 (2009). Model rules are nonbinding, and the PRA does not require an agency to coordinate across departmental lines. WAC 44-14-01001.

Beal v. City of Seattle, 150 Wn. App. 865, 874-875 (2009) AG’s rules are non-binding but contain persuasive reasoning. WAC 44-14-03006 (Requestors are strongly encouraged to make written requests).

26

Page 27: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Rental Housing Association of Puget Sound v. City of Des Moines, 165 Wn.2d 525, 539 (2009) (Attorney General’s model rules require an agency to create a withholding index or privilege log when claiming an exemption from disclosure. WAC 44-14-04004(4)(b)(ii).)

Soter v. Cowles, 162 Wn.2d 716, 753-754 (2007) (The Attorney General's model rules on public disclosure explain that agencies can seek injunctive relief. WAC 44-14-08004(5)(c).)

27

Page 28: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

RCW 42.56.565 (Inmate requests) made to harass or intimidate the agency or its employees; likely threaten the security of correctional facilities; likely threaten the safety or security of staff, inmates, family

members of staff, family members of other inmates, or any other person; OR

may assist criminal activity.

HB 1317 (Exempting photos and dates of birth for criminal justice agency workers)

SB 6367 (Disclosure by link to agency website) SB 5295 (Sunshine committee

recommendations) HB 2736 (Establishing an Office of Open

Records)

28

Page 29: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Public trust damaged; more requests are filed

Newspaper publishes critical article

Careers damaged

Taxpayers pay attorney fees, costs, and penalties

Municipal bankruptcy?

29

Page 30: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

Annual training for personnel with public records related job duties (Not required, but a good idea)

Right Attitude: The people are sovereign and agencies are the

servants. “Fullest assistance” reduces hostility

When in doubt – Disclose! Agencies may waive certain exemptions No liability for “good faith” disclosures

Beware – Newspapers buy ink by the barrel Ask the Ombudsman

30

Page 31: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

AG’s Open Government Ombudsman [email protected] (360) 586-4802

Municipal Research & Services Corp.www.mrsc.org (206) 625-1300

Model Rules on Public Disclosurewww.atg.wa.gov/ModelRules.aspx

Secretary of State (retention of records) www.secstate.wa.gov/archives/RecordsManageme

nt/

31

Page 32: Washington State Attorney General’s Office April 2010 Timothy D. Ford Open Government Ombudsman Assistant Attorney General for Government Accountability

32