watsurf 2013 1 - bienvenue sur le site du llb 2013 2 . watsurf 2013 3 ... can be modified by...
TRANSCRIPT
Summary
1. Why investigate confined water as a Cu II ligand?
2. Preliminaries – Porous materials and water as a Cu II
ligand
3. Cu II loading in hydrophillic pores
4. Cu II loading in hydrophobic pores by pressure
5. Comparison of the two types of nano pores
4. Concluding remarks
2 WATSURF 2013
WATSURF 2013 3
Water purification – nitrate uptake
Catalysis in water - green chemistry
Biological interest - Copper modified porous silica (CuPS) surfaces for
antibody detection by ELISA techniques
Why investigate confined water as a Cu II ligand?
SBA-15 Cu
H2O
CuPS-P CuPS Polystyrene
WATSURF 2013 4
POLYMERIZATION AT THE INTERFACE
Template
Acid medium Basic medium
Si
OH2+
OSi Si
O O-
SiO
OSi SiO
Si
OCH2CH3
OCH2CH3
CH3CH2O
CH3CH2O
TEOS
MCM-41 SBA-15
OH
OH OH HO
OH
OH OH HO
OH
OH OH HO
OH
OH OH HO
OH
OH OH HO
OH
OH OH HO
OH
OH OH HO
OH
OH OH HO
OH
OH OH HO
OH
OH OH HO
Mesoporous Templated Silicate materials
WATSURF 2013 5
Cu longer bond lengths
Water as a Cu II ligand
Cu2+
O H
H [Cu(H20)6]2+
2+
Cu II aqua complexes - classed as labile according to Taube’s rules
- water exchange in the 106 to 108 s-1 range
Octahedral Cu II complexes are known to submit to the Jahn-Teller effect!
A stretched octahedral structure is expected where 2 out of the 6 bond lengths
are longer (weaker bond strengths).
WATSURF 2013 6
Schematic representation of [Cu(NH3)3(H2O)3]2+ and [Cu(NH3)4(H2O)2]
2+
approaching and bonding to the SBA-15 surface.
Cu II loading in hydrophilic pores
SBA-15 + Cu II (aq) NH4OH
7 WATSURF 2013 Brodie–Linder, N., Besse, R., Audonnet, F., LeCaer, S., Deschamps, J.,
Imperor-Clerc, M., Alba–Simionesco, C. Microporous Mesoporous Materials, 132,
(2010) 518.
- O
- O
CuLx
12% Cu II w/w
20% Cu II w/w
TEM images
WATSURF 2013 8
Characterization of SBA-15 Cu
400 500 600 700 800 9000,00
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,10
0,12
0,14
Arb
itra
ry u
nit
s
Wavelength (nm)
30% Cu
20% Cu
10% Cu
7% Cu
682
700
Diffuse reflectance spectra
1250 1000 750 5000,00
0,05
0,10
0,15
3600 3200
Arb
itra
ry u
nit
s
Wavenumber (cm-1
)
0%
12%
16%
20%
960 cm-1
533 cm-1
424 cm-1
1060 cm-1
IR spectra
Perkin-Elmer AAnalyst 100 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer
Treatment of SBA-15-Cu with 2% HNO3 to
solubilize Cu II atoms by breaking the Cu-O
surface bonds.
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
5
10
15
20
% l
os
s H
2O
% Cu in SBA-15
Loss of H2O as a function of %Cu II in SBA-15 Cu materials
Amount of adsorbed H2O increases as Cu II loading increases 9 WATSURF 2013
200 400 600 80080
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
% l
oss i
n w
eig
ht
T°C
SBA-15
SBA-15 Cu (7%)
TGA (Thermogravimetric Analysis)
H20 Si Si Si
H
Si
OH O O O H H
Cu(H20)x
O O
WATSURF 2013 10
HO OH OH
OH OH
HO
0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,00
500
1000
1500
arb
itra
ry u
nit
s
p/po
native
12%
16%
20%
0,6 0,8 1,0 1,2 1,40,0
2,0x109
4,0x109
6,0x109
8,0x109
1,0x1010
1,2x1010
Inte
nsi
ty
2
12% SBA-15 Cu
SBA-15
d100
a
N2 volumetric adsorption SAX (Small Angle X-ray diffraction)
Substrate (solid)
adsorbate
Structural properties
WATSURF 2013 11
Linear
acclerator
Ar
Chromato
electron pulses of 10 ns
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
10 MeV electrons
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
10 MeV electrons
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
Si
O
H
H
.O.
.H
H
O
H
H2
SBA-15 surface
Sample holder Gas Chromatograph
H2 formation by electron irradiation of SBA-15 Cu materials
WATSURF 2013 12
0 10 20 30 40
0,0
1,0x10-9
2,0x10-9
3,0x10-9
4,0x10-9
5,0x10-9
H2
(m
ol)
pe
r g
ram
LW
C S
BA
-15
% Cu in SBA-15
SBA-15 Cu (20 %)
Copper inhibits H2 formation (water bonded to copper atoms)
Brodie-Linder N., Le Caër S., Alam M. S.,Renault J.P.,
Alba-Simionesco C., PCCP, 12 (42), (2010), 14188.
Si Si Si
H
Si
OH O O O H H
O O
Cu(H2O)x
Aqueous Cu II in a Hydrophillic vs a Hydrophobic Nanopore
Cu(H2O)x
O O Cu(H2O)x
Bonded to the surface Free from the surface
Hydrophillic Nanopore Hydrophobic Nanopore
13 WATSURF 2013
WATSURF 2013 14
Pressure line
Pressure cell
Pressure
Compressor mesoporous
materials
- OSi(CH3)3
- OSi(CH3)3
CuLx MCM-41 OSi(CH3)3/SBA-15 OSi(CH3)3+ Cu II (aq) Under pressure*
4000 bar
*Deschamps J., Audonnet F., Brodie-Linder N., Schoeffel M.,
Alba-Simionesco PCCP, 12, (2010) ,1440.
Preparation of MCM-41 OSi(CH3)3-Cu and SBA-15 OSi(CH3)3-Cu materials
MCM-41/ SBA-15 + SiCl(CH3)3 CHCl3
NEt3
MCM-41 OSi(CH3)3/SBA-15 OSi(CH3)3
Without pressure
With pressure
MCM-41- OSi(CH3)3
15 WATSURF 2013
MCM-41- OSi(CH3)3 –Cu II
4000 bar
Cu II solution
Characterization of MCM-41 C16 materials
1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 4000,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
4000 3800 3600 3400 3200 30000,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
4000 3800 3600 3400 3200 30000,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
Arb
itra
ry u
nit
s
Wavenumber (cm-1
)
-O-Cu-O
-OSi(CH3)
3-Cu
-OSi(CH3)
3
IR spectra
17 WATSURF 2013
0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,00
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
% C
uII
Concentration (mol L-1)
pressure
standard
Copper II Loading as a function of Cu II solution
N2 adsorption isotherms
0 20 40 60 80 1000
200
400
600
Vcm
3/c
m3
p/po
- OH
-OSi(CH3)3
-OCuO-
-OSi(CH3)3Cu
N2 volumetric adsorption
0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,00
200
400
600
800
-OH
-OCuO
V/V
p/po
0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,00
200
400
600
800
OSi(CH3)3
OSi(CH3)3Cu
V/V
p/po
Hydrophobic surface Hydrophillic surface
Effect of Copper II loading in the pores
N2 adsorption isotherms
18 WATSURF 2013
Concluding remarks
Copper II loading on the surface of mesoporous silicate materials always
results in a rise in the amount of confined water.
Water can be confined in hydrophobic pores using Cu II and our
pressure method.
Confined Water as a Cu II ligand plays an important role in determining
the hydrophillic/hydrophobic nature of MTS materials.
The number of water molecules bonded to the confined Cu II atoms
can be modified by dehydration creating a reversible process.
Perspectives: closer look at water in the CuII hydrophobic pores
20
WATSURF 2013
WATSURF 2013 21
Collaborators
Christiane Alba-Simionesco, LLB Saclay
Claudia Pantelei, LLB Saclay
Fabrice Audonnet, University Pascal Blaise, Clermond Ferrand
Johnny Deschamps, ENSTA, Paristech
Marcus Schoeffel, Polytechnique, Paristech
Sophie LeCaer, Laboratoire de Radiolyse, Saclay
Jean-Phillip Renault , Laboratoire de Radiolyse, Saclay
Regis Besse, University of Cergy Pontoise
Nadege Lubin-Germain, SOSCO, University of Cergy Pontoise
Florian Gallier, SOSCO, University of Cergy Pontoise
Elisa Peroni, SOSCO, University of Cergy Pontoise
Patricia Beaunier, Service de microscopie électronique,
Université Pierre et Marie Curie