wave injection at low latitudes mark golkowski remediation of enhanced radiation belts workshop lake...

13
Wave Injection at Low Latitudes Mark Golkowski Remediation of Enhanced Radiation Belts Workshop Lake Arrowhead, CA March 3-6, 2007

Post on 15-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Wave Injection at Low Latitudes Mark Golkowski Remediation of Enhanced Radiation Belts Workshop Lake Arrowhead, CA March 3-6, 2007

Wave Injection at Low Latitudes

Mark Golkowski

Remediation of Enhanced Radiation Belts Workshop

Lake Arrowhead, CA

March 3-6, 2007

Page 2: Wave Injection at Low Latitudes Mark Golkowski Remediation of Enhanced Radiation Belts Workshop Lake Arrowhead, CA March 3-6, 2007

2

Adelaide, Australia

~500 kW ? Navigation transmitter in Komsomolsk na Amur in Russian far east (400 msec pulses) at L = 2

Conjugate point in southern Australia

Stanford University receiver since January 2007

Explore and quantify wave-growth

Stanford Scientists Kangaroos

Page 3: Wave Injection at Low Latitudes Mark Golkowski Remediation of Enhanced Radiation Belts Workshop Lake Arrowhead, CA March 3-6, 2007

3

Russian Alpha Transmitters

3.6 second pattern (six 0.6s segments) 400ms pulses, 200ms off between pulses Three sites alternate among 3 frequencies

14.88 kHz

Page 4: Wave Injection at Low Latitudes Mark Golkowski Remediation of Enhanced Radiation Belts Workshop Lake Arrowhead, CA March 3-6, 2007

4

Historical Background

Triggered emissions have been observed from other mid-latitude transmitters: NAA (L=2) 14.5 kHz, 200 msec pulses

Whistler-mode Komsomolsk Alpha pulses have been studied by Tanaka et al. 1987 in the context of whistler propagation characteristics

Page 5: Wave Injection at Low Latitudes Mark Golkowski Remediation of Enhanced Radiation Belts Workshop Lake Arrowhead, CA March 3-6, 2007

5

Example 1-Hop

2

2

1A

Becc

Page 6: Wave Injection at Low Latitudes Mark Golkowski Remediation of Enhanced Radiation Belts Workshop Lake Arrowhead, CA March 3-6, 2007

6

Temporal (non-linear) Growth

Page 7: Wave Injection at Low Latitudes Mark Golkowski Remediation of Enhanced Radiation Belts Workshop Lake Arrowhead, CA March 3-6, 2007

7

Example Growth

~7-8 dB total

~70-80 dB/sec

Page 8: Wave Injection at Low Latitudes Mark Golkowski Remediation of Enhanced Radiation Belts Workshop Lake Arrowhead, CA March 3-6, 2007

8

Example Growth

Page 9: Wave Injection at Low Latitudes Mark Golkowski Remediation of Enhanced Radiation Belts Workshop Lake Arrowhead, CA March 3-6, 2007

9

Example Detection

Page 10: Wave Injection at Low Latitudes Mark Golkowski Remediation of Enhanced Radiation Belts Workshop Lake Arrowhead, CA March 3-6, 2007

10

10-Day Statistics (1-10 April)

Count of 1-hop observations in synoptic (1min/5min) recordings

10 days during and after a geomagnetic disturbance

1-Hop observations show qualitative relationship to geomagnetic activity

Need more data to quantify relationship

Page 11: Wave Injection at Low Latitudes Mark Golkowski Remediation of Enhanced Radiation Belts Workshop Lake Arrowhead, CA March 3-6, 2007

11

Diurnal patterns

Day DayNight Day DayNight

Page 12: Wave Injection at Low Latitudes Mark Golkowski Remediation of Enhanced Radiation Belts Workshop Lake Arrowhead, CA March 3-6, 2007

12

Average Daily Variations

Sunrise

Sunset

Tanaka et al. 1987 Stanford 2008

Diurnal variation shows maxima after sunset and sunrise

Tanaka et al. 1987: diurnal variation is same for whistlers and is a propagation effect (duct formation, coupling in/out of duct)

Page 13: Wave Injection at Low Latitudes Mark Golkowski Remediation of Enhanced Radiation Belts Workshop Lake Arrowhead, CA March 3-6, 2007

13

Summary

1-Hop echoes regularly observed from Komsomolsk Alpha transmitter

Echoes exhibit temporal growth of ~70-80 dB/sec Propagation delays of 460 msec – 540msec

equatorial electron concentrations of 4000-5000 cm-3 at L = 2

Triggered of frequency emmisions not observed yet, except perhaps on DEMETER satellite

Diurnal variations likely result from propagation/ducting effects

Future Work: statistically quantify effect of geomagnetic conditions on wave growth