ways of knowing
DESCRIPTION
WAYS OF KNOWING. SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE Or OBSTACLE TO IT?. REASON. This is a way of acquiring new knowledge about the world We go beyond the immediate evidence of the senses. So, how good is your reasoning?. A man rides into town on Friday, he stays three night and leaves on Friday. HOW? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
WAYS OF
KNOWING
SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGEOr
OBSTACLE TO IT?
2
REASON This is a way of
acquiring new knowledge about the world
We go beyond the immediate evidence of the senses
3
So, how good is your reasoning?
A man rides into town on Friday, he stays three night and leaves on Friday. HOW?HOW?
Antony and Cleopatra are lying dead on the floor of a villa in Egypt. Nearby there is a broken bowl. There is no mark on either of them and they were not poisoned. HOW DID THEY DIE?HOW DID THEY DIE?
4
And the answer is……meet
Antony &
Cleopatra
And Friday
5
Finally Rationalism and certainty? All human beings are mortal
Socrates is a human being It necessarily follows that
Socrates is mortal No if’s’ or but’s’, no opinions,
nothing to do with culture Given the assumptions
or premise the conclusion has to follow
htt
p:/
/ww
w.s
ru.e
du
/im
ag
es/
ph
ilo-s
ocr
ate
s.jp
g
6
What is rationalism? The central tenet is that we can
discover important truths through reason alone
Rationalist like
Logic ] certain and useful, Maths ] unlike empiricism
http
://al
mez
.pnt
ic.m
ec.e
s/~
agos
0000
/des
cart
e.gi
f
http://www.redmolotov.com/images/designs/cogitoergosum_design.jpg
7
Three kinds of reasoning There are three kinds
of reasoning Deductive Inductive Informal
All have serious fallacies – invalid patterns of reasoning that need to be considered and guarded against
So, get your brains into gear and start thinking
http://www.rajeev.net.in/C-H.html
8
Deductive reasoning
general - specific
All apples are fruit Some apples are red Therefore Some fruit is red
This is a syllogism Syllogisms have1. 2 premises and a
conclusion2. 3 terms that each
appear twice3. QUANTIFIERS – all,
some, no – the quantity that is being referred to
9
Truth and validity – crucial diff
These are NOT the same thing Truth = what is the case, it is
property of the statement, validity of arguments
Validity = whether the conclusion follows the premises
So an argument is valid or invalid NOT true or false
STAY WITH ME ON THIS ONE
10
The validity of an ARGUMENT is INDEPENDENT of the truth or falsity of the premises
+ =
http://ftbelknap.org/PINK-PANTHER.html
http://www.astrologyweekly.com/natal-charts/images/che-guevara.php.jpg
http://ww
w.lateinam
erika.de/Laender/images/bolivien/C
he_Guevara.jpg
It gets worse!!
11
You can have false premises and true conclusions
WHAT DO YOU RECKON THIS ONE IS?WHAT DO YOU RECKON THIS ONE IS?
http://www.the-academy-of-music.com/lessons.html
http
://w
ww
.car
adis
iac.
com
/med
ia/im
ages
/le_m
ag/m
ag19
6/er
ic_c
lapt
on_1
96.jp
g
http://catsinsinks.com/images/cats/42b0938bbf875.jpg
12
Mission Impossible is – valid argument with true premises and
false conclusion In groups of 4 peopleIn groups of 4 people Construct syllogisms that haveConstruct syllogisms that have
2 true premises, and a true conclusion2 true premises, and a true conclusion 1 true premise, 1 false premise and a true conclusion1 true premise, 1 false premise and a true conclusion 1 true premise, 1 false premise and a false 1 true premise, 1 false premise and a false
conclusionconclusion 2 false premises, and a true conclusion2 false premises, and a true conclusion 2 false premises, and a false conclusion2 false premises, and a false conclusion
http://flatrock.org.nz/topics/animals/assets/black_widow_spider.jpg
13
Argument structure Pure logic is concerned with the structure of the
arguments not the content All dogs are mammals Some dogs are Boxers THEREFORE – some mammals are Boxers
This reduces to All A’s are B Some A’s are C Therefore some C are B’s
This abstraction helps avoid belief bias – belief that an argument is valid because we
agree with the conclusion
14
Venn diagrams, should help with this
Syllogisms are no easy matter to sort – Venn diagrams can be used to help (Maybe)
You build up the Venn diagram from the premises then you can work out if the conclusion is correct
Now you tryNow you try All A’s are B’s All A’s are B’s All B’s are C’s All B’s are C’s Therefore Therefore
all C’s are A’sall C’s are A’s
BEWARE
15
Over to you Over to you again again Use Venn diagrams to state whether each of Use Venn diagrams to state whether each of
these are valid or invalidthese are valid or invalid All Italians eat spaghettiAll Italians eat spaghetti Giovanni Rossi eats spaghettiGiovanni Rossi eats spaghetti Therefore Giovanni Rossi is ItalianTherefore Giovanni Rossi is Italian
No Martians have red nosesNo Martians have red noses Rudolph has a red noseRudolph has a red nose Therefore Rudolph is not a MartianTherefore Rudolph is not a Martian
Some monks are Tibetan Some monks are Tibetan All Tibetans are good at YogaAll Tibetans are good at Yoga Therefore some monks are good at yogaTherefore some monks are good at yoga
16
And in conclusion (just in case your not totally confused)
Just because the argument is valid – it does not mean the conclusion is true
For the conclusion to be true you must be able to answer yes to both of these Are the premises true? Is the argument valid?
17
The premise is obvious = assume the rest In everyday life we rarely argue formally
and some things are missing BUT WHATBUT WHAT
Jenny goes to Oxford University, so she must Jenny goes to Oxford University, so she must be very intelligentbe very intelligent
Graham is a politician so he is probably lyingGraham is a politician so he is probably lying Since it is natural to eat meat there is nothing Since it is natural to eat meat there is nothing
morally wrong with itmorally wrong with it
18
However!! Deductive reasoning preserves the
truth – it is NOT a source of truth All human beings are mortal
Socrates is a human being Therefore Socrates is mortal This is true if the premises are true –
knowledge of mortality is not from reasoning it is based on experience
AND SO TO
19
Inductive reasoningspecific to
general
How do we know humans are mortal?
All humans in history have died therefore through inductive inference we move form the observed to the unobserved
All observed humans are mortal so ALL humans are mortal
We use this all the time in everyday life
Past experience shapes our expectations
20
Language is based on inductive reasoning HOW?HOW?
My cat gets excited when I go to the fridge
is he using is he using
inductive reasoning?inductive reasoning? Do animals reason?Do animals reason?
Or is it something else?Or is it something else?
SCIENCE USES INDUCTIVE REASONING It formulates general laws from observations
21
Deduction vs. Induction General – particular
Example Water is a liquid Liquids turn to a gas
when heated Water will turn to a
gas if heatedValue
More certain, less informative
Particular to generalExample
Liquid A turns to a gas when heated, liquid B turns to a
gas when heated etc All liquids turn to
gas when heatedValue
More informative but less certain
22
How reliable is inductive reasoning?
The problem here is hasty generalisation Sexism Racism
What is the boiling point of water?
Hasty generalisations are made worse by confirmation bias
http://www.paistortuga.net/binladillas/wtc/arabs-muslims.jpg
23
What hasty generalisations do you What hasty generalisations do you make?make?
Are prejudice, generalisations and Are prejudice, generalisations and scientific law different?scientific law different?
Read this carefullyRead this carefullyA businessman has just turned off the A businessman has just turned off the
lights in the store when a man lights in the store when a man appeared and demanded money. The appeared and demanded money. The owner opened a cash register . The owner opened a cash register . The contents of the cash register were contents of the cash register were
scooped up and the man sped away. A scooped up and the man sped away. A member of the police force was notified member of the police force was notified
promptly. promptly.
24
Good or bad generalisation
? Certain criteria make
for more reliable generalisations Number – see 1 dog
swimming it is not enough to conclude that all can swim
Variety – various circumstances, different breeds of dog, young, old
http://www.dadspetcare.com/dogs/images/Dog_product.jpg
http://www.csus.edu/indiv/f/foxs/ccn/images/doggy-dip3.jpg
25
Exceptions – avoid confirmation bias and actively look for counter-examples, ask friends for them?
Coherence – more evidence is needed to support strange claims
Subject area – natural sciences are more likely to yield reliable generalisations than human sciences
http://www.cathouse-fcc.org/africa03/wdog.jpg
http://www.freewebs.com/ronaldowen/Dogs%20Can%20Fly.jpg