we16 - practical integration of diversity and inclusion competencies into engineering education
TRANSCRIPT
Practical Integration of Diversity and Inclusion
Competencies into Engineering EducationLorraine M. Herger, ABET Board of Delegates
Mercy Bodarky, IBM Research Integrated Solutions
2016
Today, we will discuss -
• What is ABET?• Introduction to diversity and inclusion• Motivating interest and action• A look at the numbers• Deeper dive - diversity and inclusion• Examining Opportunities• Role of ABET? And Survey Link
INTRODUCTION
ABET Mission• Accredits educational programs• Promotes quality and innovation in education
• Communicates and collaborates with its constituents and the public
• Assists in the development and advancement of education worldwide
• Anticipates and prepares for the changing educational environment and the future needs of its constituents
• Manages its operations and resources in an effective and fiscally responsible manner
ABET Organizational StructureVolunteer-Driven: 2,200+ Volunteers
100% of accreditation decisions are made by volunteers
Board of Directors• Elected by Board of
Delegates• Provides strategic
direction and plans• Appeals process
4 Commissions• ASAC, CAC,
EAC, ETAC• Make decisions
on accreditation status
• Implement accreditation policies
• Propose changes to criteria
Program Evaluators• Visit campuses• Evaluate individual
programs• Make initial
accreditation recommendations
• “Face of ABET”
Board of Delegates• Nominated by &
represent the member societies
• Decides policy and procedures
• Approves criteria
• Accredited programs by commission: ASAC: 81 CAC: 429 EAC: 2437 ETAC: 216
ABET Accreditation StatisticsAs of 1 October 2015 … 3,569 Programs
CommissionDomestic Non-Domestic
Programs Institutions Programs InstitutionsASAC 80 62 1 1CAC 377 296 52 35EAC 2071 424 366 76ETAC 581 204 59 12
Ad Hoc Committee on Diversity and Inclusion:Committee charge
• To review and affirm or recommend revision to ABET’s policy on diversity and inclusion.
• To reconsider ABET’s role in supporting diverse learner populations within the broad range of ABET accredited programs and to make recommendations to the ABET Councils in this regard.
The question is: can ABET, via the accreditation process, promote diversity and inclusion in technical education programs?
Diversity and Inclusion- Defined
• Diversity – Individual differences• Race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation,
socio-economic status, age, physical abilities, religious beliefs, political beliefs… etc.
• Inclusion – behaviors and mindset• Promoting respect, belonging, leveraging
the value and harnessing the power of diversity to the benefit of the organization N.B. You can increase diversity, but without inclusion, it is not sustainable.
INTRODUCTION
No Diversity (within
organization)No Inclusion
DiversityPoor Inclusion
Diversity AND
Inclusion
INTRODUCTION
In Pictures…..
Diversity does not = Inclusion
‘Diversity’ is being invited to the dance.
‘Inclusion’ is being invited to dance.
INTRODUCTION
In Pictures…..
Motivation – Inclusive Excellence• Competitive Advantage
• Demographic Imperative
• (Social Justice)
Doing things RIGHT
The RIGHT thing to do
Regardless of Motivation – Industry tells us they want and need more diverse engineers and that all engineers need to be able to work effectively in a diverse, multicultural, and global environment
MOTIVATION
The Competitive Advantage
There is significant, rigorous research that shows diverse organizations have a
competitive advantage over homogeneous organizations
MOTIVATION
We need a variety of ideas
“If everyone is thinking the same thing, someone isn’t thinking at all,” Gen. George Patton
MOTIVATION
The Powerful Link Between Diversity and Innovation• Study of 2.5M scientific articles showed that papers
with diverse authors received more citations• “Collaboration: Strength in diversity”,
R. B. Freeman and W. Huang, 16 Sep 2014, Nature
• link between a team’s ethnic mix and highly cited papers
• Women 2.0 “….diverse founding teams of tech companies fare better. They are 33% more capital efficient, they last longer and they file more innovative patents. They make better businesses……”
MOTIVATION
The Competitive Advantage of Diversity – The Caveat
HOWEVER…
• Research cited many benefits of diverse workplaces – provided they are harmonious
• “Cultural Disharmony Undermines Workplace Creativity”
• Research by Prof. Y.J. Chua, Harvard Business School “Working Knowledge”
• (the ‘inclusion’ difference - we’ll get back to this later)
MOTIVATION
The minority changes the majorityStudies show:• When we hear dissent from someone different
from us, it provokes more thought than when it comes from someone who looks like us
• People work harder in diverse environments, both cognitively and socially. This hard work leads to better outcomes.
• “How Diversity Makes Us Smarter”, K. W. Phillips, Scientific American, Oct 1, 2014
Diversity makes each of us perform better!
MOTIVATION
By 2050, No One Race/Ethnic Category Will be a Majority
Source: NACME Analysis of population projections from U.S. Census, 2012.
Latino American Indian/Alaska Native Two or More RacesAfrican American Asian American/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Non-Latino White
2012 2050
MOTIVATION
Put simply, we need EVERYONE on board to
address the grand challenges of the coming decades.
MOTIVATION
BS Degrees – we’re only tapping PART of our available talent
61%5%
13%
17%1%0%2%
General US Pou-lation
Cauc.As AmAf AmLatNAPITwo+
69%
14%4%
11%0%0%2%
Undergraduates in Engineering
Cauc.As AmAf AmLatNAPITwo+
34.5 14.5
NUMBERS
First– what is Inclusion?Characteristics of an inclusive team environment
• ensuring that everyone is heard and respected
• making it safe to propose novel ideas• giving team members decision-making
authority• sharing credit for success• implementing feedback from the team
Inclusion
Mitchell R. Hammer“Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity”
The growth of an inclusive mindsetInclusion
• Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA, DLE Survey, 5 years of data, 19,580 students in 26 US colleges
• 43.6% have experienced discrimination
Discrimination on Campus Inclusion
Another measure of inclusion – persistence in the workforce• What fraction of engineering degree
holders are working in engineering jobs 5 years after graduation?- 62% of females- 79% of African American males- 90% of white males
• Only 20% of non-engineering employed women leave their fields
• Possessing an advanced degree increases a woman’s chance of leaving the engineering workforce by 165%Sources: NSF Stemming the Tide: Why Women Leave Engineering, AWIS, American Institutes for
Research
Inclusion
The cost of this exodus• To the Individual
- BS: Lower wages- MS/PhD: 2-10 years of post-baccalaureate
earnings• Government
- PhD: ~$250k to $500k• Employer
- 5 years: ~$1M• Society
- >100,000 non-practicing, STEM-qualified workers
Inclusion
Objectivity is Compromised by Unconscious Biasand Cognitive Errors
• Some givens: Biases are usually unintentional. Everyone makes cognitive errors. Decisions made quickly are more susceptible
to errors and unconscious bias. Biases can be advantageous or
disadvantageous to those being evaluated.
BARRIERS TO INCLUSION
From Virginia Valian
BARRIERS TO INCLUSION
Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of "Blind" Auditions on Female Musicians
Claudia Goldin, Cecilia RouseResult:
Using a screen increased the probability of a woman advancing through auditions by 50%
So if Bias can affect what you SEE and HEAR –
it isn’t hard to understand that it ALSO affects
what you think and believe
Does it really affect our judgment?
Micro-messaging
• What are ‘micro-messages’• Subtle, usually unintended ,
unconscious messages• Sent and received EVERY
time we interact with someone
• Often results in micro-inequities
• Example: A person loses confidence because they see a skeptical response to their contributions becomes more hesitant – resulting in more skepticism
BARRIERS TO INCLUSION
Examples of Micromessages – interactions with students -• Research shows that if a student is ‘struggling’ with
answering a question, the faculty will typically ‘rescue’ them much faster if they are a woman or an underrepresented minority.
• The message – you probably can’t do it without my help. • Research shows that if a student of color answers a
question correctly, they are more likely to get a response of surprise (and also praise), but the interaction ends. A majority student is more likely be probed further to extend the interaction
• The message (to the person of color) “I’m surprised you got the answer, but don’t believe that you could go further.”
BARRIERS TO INCLUSION
Inclusiveness via Engineering Education• Motivate
• Why and how diversity and inclusion leads to better groups, schools, and businesses
• How inclusive behaviors benefit YOU… yes YOU, too• Educate
• Awareness of unintended bias, micromessaging, privileges, culture
• Equip• Provide tools for all students to learn and grow in their
understanding of diversity and inclusion• Practice and Model
• Inclusive classrooms, training, develop workplace competencies for diverse and inclusive environments
Opportunities for change
ABET Accreditation ProcessObjectives
• Assure that graduates of an accredited program are adequately prepared to enter and continue the practice of applied science, computing, engineering, and engineering technology
• Stimulate the improvement of technical education
• Encourage new and innovative approaches to technical education and its assessment
Role of ABET
1. Is excellence in diversity and inclusion a marker of quality that the ABET accreditation processes should consider?
YesNoMaybe (w/ text box)
2. What are your thoughts on whether ABET should require institutions to reflect on their goals and processes for continuous improvement in diversity and inclusion?
Open Text Box3. What are your thoughts on whether ABET should have criteria related to institutionally-defined metrics for diversity and inclusion?
Open Text Box4. If you think that ABET should consider diversity and inclusion in the accreditation process, in which part of the process would you require self-study? (can select multiple choices)
Criteria 1 – StudentsCriteria 2 – Program Educational ObjectivesCriteria 3 – Student OutcomesCriteria 4 – Continuous ImprovementsCriteria 5 – CurriculumCriteria 6 – FacultyCriteria 7 - FacilitiesCriteria 8 – Institution Support
5. For any criteria you selected above, please share your ideas on how this would be implemented.Open Text Box
6. Please share any other thoughts you have about the role of ABET in advocating for, or insisting on, diversity and inclusion in engineering programs. Open text Box
Survey
Sample Survey Questions