wealth accumulation and portfolio choice with taxable and tax-deferred accounts 0 francisco gomes,...
TRANSCRIPT
Wealth accumulation and portfolio choice with taxable and tax-deferred accounts
1
Wealth accumulation and portfolio choice with taxable and tax-deferred accounts
Francisco Gomes, Alexander Michaelides, Valery Polkovnichenko
Discussion by: Otto van Hemert
March 2005
Wealth accumulation and portfolio choice with taxable and tax-deferred accounts
2
The paper• Household wealth accumulation and portfolio
choice• For both
– direct stockholders (DS), and– indirect stockholders (IS)
• In both the– Taxable Account (TA), and– Tax-deferred account (TDA)
• Main focus on accumulation phase where uninsurable labor income risk figures prominently
Wealth accumulation and portfolio choice with taxable and tax-deferred accounts
3
Paper is part of a larger research agenda: Gomes-Michaelides (2004)
• Match empirical stock market participation and asset allocation in a life-cycle model
• Key features– disentangle risk aversion and elasticity of intertemporal
substitution (EIS) a la Epstein-Zin (1989).
– fixed stock market entry cost
– heterogeneity in risk aversion
• Make no difference TA and TDA• Less focus on wealth accumulation
Wealth accumulation and portfolio choice with taxable and tax-deferred accounts
4
Four contributions
I. Discuss empirical evidence on wealth accumulation and portfolio choice for DS and IS in TA and TDA separately
II. Develop life-cycle model and find investor preferences that match empirical evidence
III. Implications sub-optimal contribution rates to TDA
IV. Impact introduction TDAs on wealth accumulation and asset allocation
Wealth accumulation and portfolio choice with taxable and tax-deferred accounts
5
Empirical findings• Us population divided by stockholder status
1998 2001– Non-stockholders: 65.4% 47.1%– Indirect stockholders: 13.6% 21.4%– Direct stockholders: 21.0% 31.5%
• Differences DS vs. IS– DS have more significant financial savings in TA;
IS basically have their net-housing wealth as TA– DS have higher wealth/income ratio.
Wealth accumulation and portfolio choice with taxable and tax-deferred accounts
6
The life-cycle model• The preference parameters:
– DS: high risk-aversion, high EIS– IS: low risk-aversion, low EIS
• Empirical fact that DS have higher wealth/income ratio is matched– High risk-aversion high precautionary saving– High EIS willingness to exploit high return on
savings by postponing much consumption
• Known puzzle that retirees decumulate too slow remains…
Wealth accumulation and portfolio choice with taxable and tax-deferred accounts
7
Exogenous assumption that IS hold no stocks in TA
• GMP justify this by noticing the empirical liquid taxable wealth is too little too pay a one-time stock market participation cost
• But in the model net housing wealth is included in taxable wealth?! DS can invest this in stocks
• Somewhat inconsistent attitude towards net housing wealth
• Deeper question: can you increase mortgage to consume or invest the proceeds?
Wealth accumulation and portfolio choice with taxable and tax-deferred accounts
8
Provide further intuition on the difference between DS and IS
• Economic story behind tying high (low) risk aversion to high (low) EIS?
• Empirically, who are the DS and IS?– Labor income level– Education (proxy for intelligence)– Female or male head of household– Number of car accidents involved in
• If eg income level matters, then scale independent model might be misleading
Wealth accumulation and portfolio choice with taxable and tax-deferred accounts
9
Extension: sub-optimal contribution rates to TDA
• Cost of following a fixed contribution rate is small.• Cost of “one-size-fits-all” is high• If a fixed contribution rate is imposed, then
optimally set it below average from optimal decisions– GMP: too low consumption for liquidity constrained
young is very costly– Also over-investment in TDA is harder to compensate (in
TA) than under-investment in TDA? Related to Adair Turner’s presentation last Tuesday
Wealth accumulation and portfolio choice with taxable and tax-deferred accounts
10
Extension: introduction of a TDA
• In the presence of a TDA, some households hold stocks only indirectly (exogenous in model, justification discussed)
• What if those same households are confronted with a situation with no TDA?
• They might start to invest in stocks themselves!
• Cannot maintain exogenous assumption they do not invest in stocks in TA
Wealth accumulation and portfolio choice with taxable and tax-deferred accounts
11
Concluding Remarks• A nice and ambitious paper!
• Better justify exogenous non-participation in stock market by IS
• Provide further intuition on the difference between DS and IS
• Is the analysis on the impact of the introduction of a TDA not too much?