WEB 2.0WEB 2.0

Interactive

Web 2.0Web 2.0

Colective Intelligence

Collaborative

Social

Dynamic

Guillermina Viruet Cruz

Educ. 7101-2

Dr. Almasude

Guillermina Viruet Cruz

Educ. 7101-2

Dr. Almasude

DO YOU KNOW HOW THE DO YOU KNOW HOW THE WEB HAS EVOLVED?WEB HAS EVOLVED?

250,000 sites visited for 45 million users

At first the Web was just reading.At first the Web was just reading.

The users only had access to

read what they had and to wait

for each new publication.

There were few people creating

content

WEB 1.0

WAS

People connecting to the network

Information was generated only by

publishers and webmasters

So boring!

Next Step:FROM WEB 1.0

The term Web 2.0 was coined by Tim O'Reilly in 2004 to refer to a second generation in the history of community-based web users

Web 2.0 is a special range of services such as social networks, blogs, wikis or

the folksonomies that encourage

flexible collaboration and

exchange of information

between users.

It is something like

Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0

users

Users and contributors

Users organize and share

1989

WWW

1995

1998

Web 2.0 timeline

1999

2001

2003

2004

2005

2006

2008

2007

Web 2.0 encompasses a range of technologies. The most used are blogs, wikis, podcasts and social networks .

Curve of AdoptionCurve of Adoption

Initially, had a rapid diffusion. However, for lack of knowledge decreased its acceptance in the commercial sector.

Initially, had a rapid diffusion. However, for lack of knowledge decreased its acceptance in the commercial sector.

Innovators and Early Adopters

Innovators and Early Adopters

NowBoth in the commercial sector and in education, Web 2.0 is seen as a powerful tool to construct knowledge collaboratively, (which after all can access) through individual contributions that enrich learning and teaching practice

NowBoth in the commercial sector and in education, Web 2.0 is seen as a powerful tool to construct knowledge collaboratively, (which after all can access) through individual contributions that enrich learning and teaching practice

Web 2.0, the participatory web, is already having a significant impact, but the major changes are yet to come (Corbin Ball Associates, 2006).

Web 2.0, the participatory web, is already having a significant impact, but the major changes are yet to come (Corbin Ball Associates, 2006).

1990 2009

WEB 1.0 WEB 2.0

Perceived AttributesWeb 2.0 Tools present a vast array of

opportunities—for companies that know how to use them.

Adoption of corporate technology

Web 2.0, the second generation of the web, brings richer and more efficient means of planning, collaborating, communicating and promoting events. The web is replacing shrink-wrapped, stand-alone software as the platform; data is becoming the driving force; participation is becoming the key ingredient. (Corbin Ball Associates, 2006).

Web 2.0, the second generation of the web, brings richer and more efficient means of planning, collaborating, communicating and promoting events. The web is replacing shrink-wrapped, stand-alone software as the platform; data is becoming the driving force; participation is becoming the key ingredient. (Corbin Ball Associates, 2006).

World population using web 2.0

.4%

1996

.9%

1997

2002

9.4%

2006

15.7%

2009

22.5%

You tube

RSS feed

Podcast

Flicker

My space

Social bookmarking

Reference:

History of Web 2.0 and Digital Natives. Retrieved from

http://www.xtimeline.com/timeline/History-of-Web-2-0-and-Digital-Natives

The increase in the use of social networks like Facebook, Youtube and others Web 2.0 tools among young people demonstrates the need to include them in the field of education.

The increase in the use of social networks like Facebook, Youtube and others Web 2.0 tools among young people demonstrates the need to include them in the field of education.

The phenomenon of social networks or virtual communities is growing in these two or three years in parallel with the development of services and tools known as Web 2.0.

The phenomenon of social networks or virtual communities is growing in these two or three years in parallel with the development of services and tools known as Web 2.0.

CRITICAL MASSCRITICAL MASS

The web evolution and it’s rapid grow has not allow to reach the critical mass in all Web 2.0 tools in Education and Companies. Also, there are a lot of teachers that are reluctant and have old paradigms that avoid to reach the critical mass.

The explosion of social sites where people share information and knowledge promotes a new trend toward creating a common understanding and collective created by and for users. This promotes collaborative learning as desired by different currents of face to face and virtual education , and must be seized and taken into account by the new models and methods of virtual education.

The explosion of social sites where people share information and knowledge promotes a new trend toward creating a common understanding and collective created by and for users. This promotes collaborative learning as desired by different currents of face to face and virtual education , and must be seized and taken into account by the new models and methods of virtual education.

CHANGE AGENTSCHANGE AGENTSindividual innovators are necessary to make Web 2.0 ‘work’ in a school.

individual innovators are necessary to make Web 2.0 ‘work’ in a school.

Approach Decentralized Approach

Participants create and share information with one another in order to reach a mutual understanding.

• It is a social space horizontally and rich sources of information (social network where knowledge is not closed) which is an alternative to the traditional unidirectional hierarchy and learning environments. Requires new roles for teachers and students to self-employment oriented, collaborative, critical and creative, personal expression, investigation and share resources, to create knowledge and learn ...

Educational Implications of Web 2.0

• Their sources of information and communication channels provide a more autonomous learning and enabling greater participation in group activities, which tends to increase interest and motivation of students ..

Educational Implications of Web 2.0Continued

Educational Implications of Web 2.0Continued

• With its editing applications teachers and students can easily develop materials individually or in groups, share and submit to the comments from readers.

• Provides on-line spaces for storage, classification and publication / dissemination of textual and audiovisual content, which after all can access.

Educational Implications of Web 2.0Continued

• Facilitates the implementation of new learning activities and assessment and the creation of learning networks.

• They develop and improve digital skills, since the search and selection process information and turn it into knowledge, to publication and broadcast by various media.

• Provides environments for the development of networks of schools and teachers where they can reflect on educational issues, help and develop and share resources.

ReferencesAjjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies:

Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education,. 11(2), 71-80

Alexander, B. (2006). A new way of innovation for teaching and learning. Educause Review,41(2),

32−44.Retrieve fromhttp://educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0621.pdf

BizEd, (2010). Schools take Web 2.0 to the next level. Technology, 3, 52. Retrieve from Academic

Search Complete, EBSCOhost.

Cobo Romani,C & Pardo, H. (2007). Planeta Web 2.0. Inteligencia colectiva o medios fast food.

Retrieve from www.planetaweb2.net.

Grahame Moore, M. (2007). Web 2.0: Does It Really Matter? Editorial American Journal of Distance Education,

21(4), 177–183

O’Reilly, T.(2005).“What Is Web 2.0,” Retrieve from tim.oreilly.com, <http://www.oreillynet.com/

pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web- 20.html>

Rainie, L. (2010). The raise of networked individuals. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieve from

http://www.pewinternet.org/Presentations/2010/Apr/University.

Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovation. New York: Free Press.

Grahame Moore, M. (2007). Web 2.0: Does It Really Matter? Editorial American Journal of Distance Education,

21(4), 177–183

O’Reilly, T.(2005).“What Is Web 2.0,” Retrieve from tim.oreilly.com, <http://www.oreillynet.com/

pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web- 20.html>

Rainie, L. (2010). The raise of networked individuals. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieve from

http://www.pewinternet.org/Presentations/2010/Apr/University.

Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovation. New York: Free Press.

ReferencesReferences