web 2.0 for learning in 2010

30
Poll questions Do you currently maintain a blog (y/n)? How many podcasts do you listen to in a week (0-5, 6-10, 11+)? How many of you use Twitter (y/n)? Do you use Facebook for your professional work (y/n)? Does your campus have one or more official YouTube channels (y/n)? How widespread is social bookmarking on your campus (nothing, early adopters, some use, mainstream)?

Upload: bryan-alexander

Post on 13-May-2015

1.659 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

An overview of some sample Web 2.0 uses in American higher ed.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Poll questions

• Do you currently maintain a blog (y/n)?• How many podcasts do you listen to in a week (0-5, 6-

10, 11+)?• How many of you use Twitter (y/n)?• Do you use Facebook for your professional work (y/n)?• Does your campus have one or more official YouTube

channels (y/n)?• How widespread is social bookmarking on your

campus (nothing, early adopters, some use, mainstream)?

Page 2: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Aspects of social media

• Blogging• Podcasting• Wikis• Twitter• Facebook• Folksonomies

• Mashups• Flickr• Web video• Social

bookmarking• Coda: some trends

Page 3: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Practices: years of edublogging

Selected, documented practices:

• Publish syllabus• Publish student

papers• Discussion• Journaling• Project blogs• Public scholarship

• Creative writing• Distributed seminars• Campus organizations• Prospective students• Library collections• Alumni relations• Project management• Liveblogging

Page 4: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Blog as courseware

Page 5: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Blogs for public intellectuals

Page 6: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Blogging community involvement

Page 7: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010
Page 8: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010
Page 9: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Web 2.0 content distribution models:

Rutgers;University of Mary

Washington;http://www.journalofamericanhistory.org/podcast/

Page 10: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

The specter of WikipediaRecognition and pedagogies

Page 11: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010
Page 12: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Twitter republication

Page 13: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Twitter in class

“Assignments – A bit of tinkering led us to the conclusion that a minimalist approach is best. After asking the students to read five forensics articles related to the historical case and send two tweets about each, we all agreed this was counter-productive and too hard to track. After that barrage, the typical assignment involved posting one comment and one question to classmates. After a while, one question OR comment seemed enough.”

Mike Winiski, Furman University

Page 14: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Twitter for professional development

“I could look inside the minds of motivated peers to learn about the new projects they were undertaking, the research reports they were studying, and Web sites they were exploring. As my comfort with Twitter grew—a process that took a few months, as is typical for new users—I became an active contributor to this knowledge network.”

William M. Ferriter, 6th grade teacher

Page 15: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Teaching Facebook

Page 16: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

George H. Williams, assistant professor of English, University of South Carolina Upstate

Practice: tag clouds

Folksonomies mainstreamed

George H. Williams, assistant professor of English at the University of South Carolina Upstate.

Page 17: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Practices mainstreams: data mashups, Web 2.0 as platform

• Open APIs• Access to data

(AccessCeramics project, Lewis and Clark College)

• Programming staff• Perceived recognition

Page 19: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010
Page 20: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Teaching with and about YouTube

Page 21: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

External hosting reexamined

Page 22: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Classic forms developing

Page 23: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

PLE vs LMS• Self-created• Consumer products• Personalization

• Small pieces, loosely joined• Variable levels of presence

Beyond the students:•Professional development•Reputation growth

Page 24: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Aggregations

Page 25: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Realtime search• Emerging market• Not always useful• No clear leader

"the great challenge of the age,“ (Google GEO, http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_web_in_five_years.php)

Page 26: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Links

Blogging• http://blogs.middlebury.edu/thewire/ • http://www.spiritual-politics.org/ • http://www.hispanichartford.org/

Podcasting• http://missinglinkpodcast.wordpress.com/ • http://smallpresschat.com/ • http://ecaudio.umwblogs.org/

Page 28: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Facebook• In The Facebook Age,

http://learn.bowdoin.edu/courses/sociology022/ • M. Gabriela Torres, Assistant Professor of

Anthropology, Wheaton College

Folksonomies• http://chronicle.com/blogPost/Using-Wordle-in-the-

classroom/22830/

Mashups and Flickr• http://accessceramics.org/

Page 29: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Web video• http://www.youtube.com/user/joverholtzerwlu • http://www.youtube.com/user/wlunews • http://www.youtube.com/user/MediaPraxisme

Social bookmarking• http://www.diigo.com/profile/edwebb

Coda: some trends• http://home.bates.edu/views/social/ • http://mediatedcultures.net/

Page 30: Web 2.0 for learning in 2010

Bryan Alexander

http://twitter.com/BryanAlexander

http://blogs.nitle.org/ and http://blogs.nitle.org/archive/

[email protected]