week 3 hwts treatment options

Upload: juan

Post on 03-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    1/80

    Heat

    Introduction to Household Water Treatment and Safe Storage, Modu

    Dr. Richard Johnston

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    2/80

    Heat kills Enzymes denature Proteins change shape Cell pressure increases

    Boiling Pasteurization

    Introduction

    DisinfectFiltrationSedimentation

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    3/80

    Higher pressure, high

    temperature Autoclave, steam sterilizati 121 C at 1 bar for 15 minut

    Lower pressure, lowe

    temperature

    Temperature and pressure

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    4/80

    Dose = Heat * Time

    Thermal death kinetic First-order kinetics assume D = time required at 121 C

    Canning 12 D reduction ofClostridiu

    Thermal death kinetics

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    5/80

    Oldest method of HW

    Estimated 600 millionusual practice >90% in Uzbekistan, Mong

    Indonesia

    Effective against all vand protozoa

    Turbidity is not a problem Prone to recontamina Flat taste

    Boiling

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    6/80

    Country Reduction inTTC

    % samples< 1 CFU/100 mL

    % samples< 10 CFU/100 mL

    Re

    India 2 LRV 60% 65% Clasen et

    Vietnam 1.5 LRV 37% 75% Clasen et

    Guatemala 0.9 LRV 71% 82% Rosa et al

    Indonesia -- 49% Sodha et

    Cambodia 2 LRV 44% 73% Brown and So

    Effectiveness in field studies

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    7/80

    If biomass is used as fuel

    Health impacts Environmental impac

    Costly (India, Viet Na

    Fuel: 0.5%-1.5% monthly i Time: 20 min/d wood colle

    minutes extra/day for treatm Another 2-5% of monthly in

    Fuel and time

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    8/80

    Not necessary to reac

    Protein damage Milk pasteurization 72 C for 15 seconds 63 C for 30 minutes

    Heat-up and cool-dow

    Difficulty of knowingwhen water is 70C

    WAPI

    Pasteurization

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    9/80

    System developed in

    Readily available was Inefficient stoves 600 C internal, >80% heat w

    Inexpensive flow-throexchanger

    Chulli system

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    10/80

    System developed in

    Readily available was Inefficient stoves 600 C internal, >80% heat w

    Inexpensive flow-throexchanger

    Chulli system

    Credit: Islam and Johnston, 2006

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    11/80

    System developed in

    Readily available was Inefficient stoves 600 C internal, >80% heat w

    Inexpensive flow-throexchanger

    Evaluation: (Gupta et Microbiologically effective Low use: 20%

    Chulli system

    Credit: Islam and Johnston, 2006

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    12/80

    Disinfection effectiveness

    Protozoa Giardia

    Bacteria E. coli,

    Viruses Adenovirus, poliovir Lab waters, Indian w

    Protozoa 6-9+

    Crypto cystsafter 1 min

    Bacteria 6-9+ B. anthrax c

    boilingViruses 6-9+ L Easily killed

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    13/80

    Disinfection effectiveness

    Protozoa

    Giardia

    Bacteria E. coli,

    Viruses Adenovirus, poliovir Lab waters, Indian w

    Protozoa 6-9+

    Crypto cystsafter 1 min

    Bacteria 6-9+ B. anthrax c

    boilingViruses 6-9+ L Easily killed

    Islam, M. F. and R. B. Johnston (2006)."Household pasteurization of drinking water: thechulli water-treatment system." Journal ofHealth, Population and Nutrition 24(3): 356-362.

    Ericsson, C. D., R. Steffen and H. Backer(2002). "Water disinfection for internationaland wilderness travelers." Clinical infectiousdiseases 34(3): 355-364.

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    14/80

    Some key elevations

    Dbendorf 440

    Zermatt 1608

    Addis Ababa 2355

    La Rinconada, Peru5101

    La Paz, Bolivia3640

    Mt. Everest 8848

    Kilimanjaro 5895

    Mt. Fuji 3776

    Aspe

    -2000

    0

    2000

    4000

    6000

    8000

    10000

    E l e v a t i o n

    , m

    The Dead Sea -427

    Mean sea level 0

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    15/80

    Some key boiling points (Celsius)

    Dbendorf 98.6

    Zermatt 94.4

    Addis Ababa 92.1La Paz, Bolivia

    87.8 Aspe

    -2000

    0

    2000

    4000

    6000

    8000

    10000

    E l e v a t i o n

    , m

    The Dead Sea 101.5

    Mean sea level 100

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    16/80

    Some key boiling points (Celsius)

    Dbendorf 98.6

    Zermatt 94.4

    Addis Ababa 92.1

    La Rinconada, Peru83.2

    La Paz, Bolivia87.8

    Mt. Everest 72.0

    Kilimanjaro 80.9

    Mt. Fuji 87.3

    Aspe

    -2000

    0

    2000

    4000

    6000

    8000

    10000

    E l e v a t i o n

    , m

    The Dead Sea 101.5

    Mean sea level 100

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    17/80

    Some key boiling points (Relative oxygen)

    Dbendorf 96

    Zermatt 82%

    Addis Ababa 77%

    La Rinconada, Peru54%

    La Paz, Bolivia66%

    Mt. Everest 33%

    Kilimanjaro 48%

    Mt. Fuji 63%

    Aspe

    -2000

    0

    2000

    4000

    6000

    8000

    10000

    E l e v a t i o n

    , m

    The Dead Sea 106

    Mean sea level 100% relative = 20.9% actual oxygen

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    18/80

    How long do you need to boil water?

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    19/80

    Advantages Challenges

    Highly effective Takes long time, including cooling

    Not affected by turbidity Changes taste of water

    Simple operation, no special equipmentneeded

    Possibility of recontamination

    Widely accepted, understood, promoted High energy and time costs

    Considerations for heat treatment

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    20/80

    Heat kills Effective against all classes

    Boiling is very widesp Recontamination is w Pasteurization works

    Summary

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    21/80

    Ultraviolet radiation

    Introduction to Household Water Treatment and Safe Storage, ModuDr. Richard Johnston

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    22/80

    Ultraviolet radiation Artificial radiation Natural radiation (sol

    Introduction: Ultraviolet Radiation

    DisinfectiFiltrationSedimentation

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    23/80

    CosmicRays

    GammaRays

    X-rays Ultraviolet Visible Infrared Mwav

    0.1 0.1 1 nm 100-400nm

    400-700nm

    Up to 1mm

    1 cm

    Electromagnetic spectrum

    Vacuum UV UV-C UV-B UV-A

    400 315280200100

    GermicidalPeak

    260

    ff

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    24/80

    Dose = Intensity * Tim 1 mJ/cm2 = 10 J/m2

    DNA absorbs in 200- Peak at 260 nm

    Most effective agains Bacteria, then Protozoa cysts, then Viruses, bacterial spores

    Typical dose 400 J/m2

    Efficacy against pathogens

    Effi i h

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    25/80

    Efficacy against pathogens

    Source: USEPA 2006, UV Disinfection Guid

    UV C G i

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    26/80

    UV-C generated by la Low-pressure mercury lam Medium-pressure lamps, 20 LED lamps developing rap

    Effective in water No impact of pH

    Turbidity can shield particl Modest temperature effect,

    at low temperatures

    UV-C Generation

    UV C i i M i A l

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    27/80

    Baja California, Mexi Small UV-C lamp (ele

    1200 J/m2

    5 litres per minute, sto

    Evaluation: water quapre-intervention, thanalternative disinfectio

    Exclusive use: 40%

    UV-C interventions: Mesita Azul

    Credit: F. Reygadas, 2012

    S l Di i f ti (SODIS)

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    28/80

    Use natural sunlight PET bottles

    Six hours exposure 2 days if cloudy

    > 20 countries, 5 mill www.sodis.ch www.fundacionsodis.

    Solar Disinfection (SODIS)

    S l i di ti

    http://www.sodis.ch/http://www.fundacionsodis.org/http://www.fundacionsodis.org/http://www.sodis.ch/
  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    29/80

    Solar irradiation

    SODIS Mechanisms

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    30/80

    Direct inactivation UV-B Much removed by PET

    Indirect inactivation UV-A Generation of Reactive Ox Internal: chromophores in c External: organic matter, ir

    Heat

    SODIS Mechanisms

    Factors affecting SODIS

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    31/80

    UV Radiation Sun height Latitude Cloud cover Altitude Ozone Ground reflection Water column

    Factors affecting SODIS

    Credit: www.sodis.ch

    Factors affecting SODIS

    http://www.sodis.ch/http://www.sodis.ch/
  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    32/80

    UV Radiation Sun height Latitude Cloud cover Altitude Ozone Ground reflection Water column

    Temperature At 50C, one hour exposure

    Turbidity < 30 NTU

    Factors affecting SODIS

    Credit: www.sodis.ch

    Disinfection effectiveness

    http://www.sodis.ch/http://www.sodis.ch/
  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    33/80

    Disinfection effectiveness

    Protozoa 2-4+ L Giardiacysts Cryptosporidi

    Bacteria 3-5+ L Salmonella > E

    Shigella > V. c

    Viruses 1-5+ LR Adenovirus, p

    echovirus, MS

    SODIS in Bolivia

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    34/80

    Since 2001 Eawag + Fondacion S Piloted in Cochabamb Training by NGOs, lo

    promoters, schools, hprofessionals, women

    700 000 users

    Evaluation: 32% mea

    Source: Musezahl, 2009, PLoS M

    SODIS in Bolivia

    Credit: Fundacin SODIS

    Is SODIS safe?

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    35/80

    PET = polyethylene t

    Antimony Adipates, phthalates Acetaldehydes, forma Bisphenol A

    Genotoxicity

    http://www.sodis.ch/methpublikationen/index_EN

    Is SODIS safe?

    Considerations for UV treatment

    http://www.sodis.ch/methode/forschung/publikationen/index_ENhttp://www.sodis.ch/methode/forschung/publikationen/index_ENhttp://www.sodis.ch/methode/forschung/publikationen/index_ENhttp://www.sodis.ch/methode/forschung/publikationen/index_ENhttp://www.sodis.ch/methode/forschung/publikationen/index_ENhttp://www.sodis.ch/methode/forschung/publikationen/index_EN
  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    36/80

    Advantages Challenges

    Highly effective (UV-C > SODIS) Limited to low turbidity

    UV-C requires electricity

    Simple (SODIS) Dependent on climate

    Inexpensive (SODIS) Takes significant time

    Low risk of recontamination (SODIS) Small volumes

    Considerations for UV treatment

    Summary

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    37/80

    What UV radiation is Efficacy against pathogens

    How UV-C interventican be adapted for HW

    How solar disinfectioworks and is applied imiddle income countr

    Summary

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    38/80

    Chemical disinfection

    Introduction to Household Water Treatment and Safe Storage, Modu

    Dr. Richard Johnston

    Introduction: Chemical disinfection

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    39/80

    Chlorine Chemistry and dosing Forms Example application

    Introduction: Chemical disinfection

    DisinfectFiltrationSedimentation

    Chlorine disinfection

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    40/80

    Since 1890s in Englanearly 20th century

    Used in 98% of US utilities

    Second most reported 5.6% of households Latin America and Caribbe

    Strong oxidant Devastates cell wall, DNA, Mechanisms not fully unde

    Chlorine disinfection

    Chlorine speciation

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    41/80

    Elemental Chlorine (C High Test Hypochlori Calcium hypochlorite Sodium hypochlorite Electrolytic generatio

    All generate Free Ch hypochlorous acid (HOCl) hypochlorite (OCl-) pKa 7.54

    Aim for pH < 8

    p

    Chlorine dose and demand

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    42/80

    Dose = Demand + Re

    Chlorine demand Organic carbon Iron and manganese Ammonia

    Target 0.5 mg/L resid Usually need 1-5 mg/L dos If turbid, double dose Guideline value for chlorin

    Safe Water System (CDC, PAHO)

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    43/80

    Household water trea Safe storage Behavior change com

    Dilute liquid chlorine pH 11+ Water Guard, Clorin, Claro

    One capful per 20 L w Dose of at least 1.9 mg/L (e Double if turbid

    y ( , )

    www.cdc.gov/safewater/

    NaDCC Tablets

    http://www.cdc.gov/safewater/http://www.cdc.gov/safewater/
  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    44/80

    Sodium Dichloroisocy About 60% free chlorine Reservoir chlorine Guideline value of 40 mg/L

    Consistent free chlori Less taste and odour

    Effervescent tablets, l

    10 litres: 1x33 mg tablet if 20 litres: 1x67 mg tablet if

    Easy to useSource: www.medentech.com

    Efficacy against pathogens

    http://www.medentech.com/http://www.medentech.com/
  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    45/80

    Dose = Concentration min-mg/L

    Recommended 0.5 m Ct = 15 min-mg/L Equivalent to 1 mg/ for 15

    HWTS, minimum dos Ct = 56 min-mg/L

    y g g

    Efficacy against pathogens

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    46/80

    0.01 0.1 1 10 100Ct99 , mg-min/L

    Bacteria0.04 0.08

    Viruses2 30

    Protozoa25 - 245

    Source: WHO Guidelines for Dr

    Efficacy against pathogens

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    47/80

    0.01 0.1 1 10 100Ct99 , mg-min/L

    Bacteria0.04 0.08

    Viruses2 30

    Protozoa25 - 245

    Source: WHO Guidelines for Dr

    Efficacy against pathogens

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    48/80

    0.01 0.1 1 10 100Ct99 , mg-min/L

    Bacteria0.04 0.08

    Viruses2 30

    Protozoa25 - 245

    Source: WHO Guidelines for Dr

    Disinfection effectiveness

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    49/80

    Protozoa 2-5 LR Cryptosporidi

    Bacteria 3-6+ L Spores may b

    Viruses 2-5 LRV Longer time r

    Combined chlorine

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    50/80

    Free chlorine + AmmChloramines

    Monochloramine Dichloramine Trichloramine

    Less efficient disinfec

    Stronger odour

    Note: Disinfection By-products

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    51/80

    Organic carbon Trihalomethanes (e.g. chloro

    Haloacetic acids Carcinogenic in laboratory a

    concentrations

    Guideline values, 1 in 1cancer cases

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    52/80

    Example: Gadyen Dlo in Haiti

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    53/80

    Credit: M. Ritter, Deep Sprdeepspri

    Gadyen Dlo evaluation

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    54/80

    Conducted in Norther Not in the earthquake zone

    75% report current us 56% had free chlorine resid

    Expansion to earthqua Massive free distribution High uptake, uncertain sust

    Source: Harshfield, Am. J. Trop. MCredit: M. Ritter, Deep Springs Internationaldeepspringsinternational.org

    Other disinfectants

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    55/80

    Chloramines Chlorine dioxide Ozone

    Bromine Silver

    Considerations for chlorination

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    56/80

    Advantages Challenges

    Highly effective against bacteria Ineffective against protozoa

    Residual protection Taste and odour

    Simple to use Requires low turbidity

    Low cost Requires supply chain

    Misunderstanding about by-produ

    Summary

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    57/80

    Chlorine is widely usconventional treatmen

    A variety of sources, achlorine in water

    Highly effective again Effective against viru

    protozoa NotCryptosporidium

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    58/80

    Safe Storage

    Introduction to Household Water Treatment and Safe Storage, Modu

    Dr. Richard Johnston

    Introduction: Safe Storage

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    59/80

    1

    Water Resource

    2 Delivery system

    3 Collection and Transport

    4

    Household storage

    5 Consumption

    Characteristics of safe storage

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    60/80

    Opening Small enough to discourage ha Large enough for easy filling Cap Possible to clean

    Tap or spigot for withdra

    Portable Stable (flat bottom), rob (Size appropriate for tre

    Inexpensive, available lo

    Source: UNICEF Water Quality Handbook,

    Safe storage containers

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    61/80

    CDC Container, 20 L Oxfam bucket, 14 L

    Credit: www.nrs-international.com Credit: www.cdc.gov/safewater

    Jerrycans

    http://www.nrs-international.com/http://www.cdc.gov/safewaterhttp://www.cdc.gov/safewaterhttp://www.nrs-international.com/http://www.nrs-international.com/http://www.nrs-international.com/
  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    62/80

    Credit: DFID, Jess SeldonCredit: UNICEF, Pierre Holz

    Buckets and jars

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    63/80

    Credit: M. Ritter, Deep Springs Internationaldeepspringsinternational.org

    Credit: D. Lantagnewww.cdc.gov/safewa

    Water storage in refugee camps

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    64/80

    Malawi refugee cam Repeated outbreaks of dia

    Well water, high micrbobi

    Improved 20 L stora Provided free to 25% of in Exchanged for previous c

    53% reduction in tot 69% reduction in geometr

    Finger rinse: high coSource: Roberts et al, Bulletin of the WHO, 2001http://www.who.int/bulletin/archives/79(4)280.pdf

    Improved water storage in Benin

    http://www.who.int/bulletin/archives/79(4)280.pdfhttp://www.who.int/bulletin/archives/79(4)280.pdf
  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    65/80

    Rural Benin, high leve At least 40% using public p

    Randomized interventcontainer with tap

    72 villages, 50% selected fo 50% plastic, 50% ceramic. Cost $24-$33, no cost recov

    88% continued use aft Clay containers prone to br

    70% lessE. coli contamSource: Gnther and Schipper, Health Econo

    Summary

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    66/80

    Safe storage containdesigned to minimiz

    recontamination Desired characteristics

    Examples Intervention studies

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    67/80

    Combinations

    Introduction to Household Water Treatment and Safe Storage, ModuDr. Richard Johnston

    Introduction

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    68/80

    DisinfectioFiltrationSedimentation

    Multiple barriers

    Informal combination Commercial combina

    Informal combinations

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    69/80

    Sedimentation, roughceramic filtration, or b

    Heat, SODIS, or chlo

    Safe storage containe

    Typical combination: filtration + chlorine + safe

    Source: CAWST - The Centre for Affordable Water and Sanitation Technology (www.cawst.org)

    Coagulation and chlorination

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    70/80

    Informal combination

    P&G Purifier Watermaker

    Good for turbid water Requires stirring cont

    Separate safe storageCredit: Procter & Gamble

    Filtration and disinfection

    http://childrensafedrinkingwater.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83452215469e2015437e112bf970c-pi
  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    71/80

    Source: www.eurekaforbes.com Source: www.pureitwater.com Source: www.tataswach.com

    Minera Aquasure Pureit Swach

    Source: biosi

    http://www.eurekaforbes.com/http://www.pureitwater.com/http://www.tataswach.com/https://biosil.wordpress.com/https://biosil.wordpress.com/http://www.tataswach.com/http://www.pureitwater.com/http://www.eurekaforbes.com/
  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    72/80

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    73/80

    Key Messages, Week 3

    Introduction to Household Water Treatment and Safe Storage, ModuDr. Richard Johnston

    Introduction

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    74/80

    Disinfection

    Heat Ultraviolet Chemical

    Safe storage

    Combined systems

    Heat

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    75/80

    Boiling

    Pasteurization

    Effective against all cpathogens

    Ultraviolet radiation

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    76/80

    CosmicRays

    GammaRays

    X-rays Ultraviolet Visible Infrared Mwav

    0.1 0.1 1 nm 100-400nm 400-700nm Up to 1mm 1 cm

    Vacuum UV UV-C UV-B UV-A

    400 315280200100

    GermicidalPeak260

    Chemical disinfection

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    77/80

    Chlorination Liquids Tablets

    Different effectivenespathogens

    Safe water system Disinfection Safe storage Behaviour change communwww.cdc.gov/safewater/

    Safe storage

    http://www.cdc.gov/safewater/http://www.cdc.gov/safewater/
  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    78/80

    Characteristics of safecontainers Examples Intervention studies

    Combined systems

  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    79/80

    Multiple barriers

    Informal combination

    Commercial combina

    http://childrensafedrinkingwater.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83452215469e2015437e112bf970c-pi
  • 8/12/2019 WEEK 3 HWTS Treatment Options

    80/80