week three part i

57
COMM 401 Interpreting Strategic Discourse Week Two Media/Mediation

Upload: trevor-parry-giles

Post on 12-Jan-2015

394 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Week Three Part I

COMM 401Interpreting Strategic DiscourseWeek Two

Media/Mediation

Page 2: Week Three Part I

From Film to TV• Television represented the merger of

motion picture technology with broadcasting technology.

• Telegraphs (1840s) and telephones (1870s) were examples of narrowcast communication media. Both were also dependent upon wired transmission.

Page 3: Week Three Part I

Marconi and the Wireless

Guglielmo Marconi: Invented wireless telegraphy (1894)

– used code, not voice

Page 4: Week Three Part I

TV Technology

Lee De Forest was instrumental in moving Marconi’s wireless telegraphy to wireless telephony, allowing for the transmission of voice and music.

De Forest was particularly known for the invention of the vacuum tube that was the beginning of modern electronics.

Set the stage for broadcasting to mass audiences.

Different from narrowcasting, or the person-to-person communication of telegraphy and telephony.

Page 5: Week Three Part I

The Development of Broadcasting

RCA, in 1926, purchased AT&T’s telephone group network to form the National Broadcasting Company (NBC)

The began the affiliate system of programming—a national network broadcasting to local affiliates who would also provide their own programming.

RCA’s monopoly was eventually subject to anti-trust moves by the government.

In the 1940s, NBC-blue was sold and became ABC.

Page 6: Week Three Part I

Understanding Media

"Any hot medium allows of less participation than a cool one, as a lecture makes for less participation than a seminar, and a book for less than a dialogue."

Page 7: Week Three Part I

The Current Media Landscape

How would you describe the role of mediation on contemporary strategic discourse?

What are your primary patterns of communication consumption? How are the messages you consume mediated?

How does your media consumption differ from those who were media consumers 50 years ago?

How will media consumers 50 years from now encounter strategic discourse differently from you?

Page 8: Week Three Part I

COMM 401Interpreting Strategic DiscourseWeek Three

Style

Page 9: Week Three Part I

Theories of Language

Representation theory of language: How does the language accurately,

aesthetically, powerfully represent the world the human mind?

Basis for formalistic study of style and language use.

Meaning-centered theory of language: How do languages work to build and maintain

humans’ individual and collective lives? Concerned with symbols and symbolicity.

Page 10: Week Three Part I

Basic Precepts of Symbol Use

Symbol systems are both outwardly and inwardly directed social structures:

Symbols stand in place of something

Symbols stand for ideas or feelings associated with the object, person, etc.

Richards’ Semantic Triangle

Cat

Thought

Page 11: Week Three Part I

Basic Precepts of Symbol Use Symbols embody

people’s perceptions of and reactions toward the world.

Sapir-Whorf theory of language constructionism.

Richards’ approach to the importance of context to decide on meaning

Page 12: Week Three Part I

Basic Precepts of Symbol Use

Symbol systems are both public and private. Individual, idiosyncratic symbol

systems. Co-cultural symbol systems.

Meanings are never completely shared. Misunderstanding is the deliberate

attempt to disrupt the sharing of meaning.

Non-understanding is innocent, unintentional disrupting in meaning sharing.

Page 13: Week Three Part I

Language in Cicero

Rhetorica ad Herennium Elocutio: For Cicero, speaker

purpose guided speaker style▪ To prove—use the plain style▪ To please—use the middle

style▪ To persuade—use the grand

style

Devoted to Principles of Style.

3 kinds of style: Grand/Swollen Middle/Slack or Drifting Simple/Meager

Qualities of appropriate and finished Style include: Taste Artistic Composition

Page 14: Week Three Part I

Style in Rhetoric

Basic Criteria for style: Competent language

use Clarity of language use Appropriateness of

language use Impressiveness of

language use

Language use signals the different world views that define and shape rhetoric.

Language use is imposed on a speaker by: The time when they live; The occasion of the

rhetoric; The genre of the

discourse.

Page 15: Week Three Part I

Stuffy Style = lengthy clauses (more secondary structure); avoidance of simple words; use of the passive voice.

• The acceptance of, and continuance hitherto in, the office to which your suffrages have twice called me have been a uniform sacrifice of inclination to the opinion of duty and to a deference for what appeared to be your desire. I constantly hoped that it would have been much earlier in my power, consistently with motives which I was not at liberty to disregard, to return to that retirement from which I had been reluctantly drawn.– George Washington, Farewell

Address, 1796

Page 16: Week Three Part I

Tough Style = monosyllabic words; “to be” verbs; few adjectives.

• In my inaugural address I said that the liberty we espouse is a universal aspiration. Many Americans trace their roots back to Europe, and we can trace many of our founding ideals there, as well. It was a Frenchman who taught the framers of our Constitution the importance of the separation of powers. It was a Scot who explained the virtues of a free market. It was an Englishman who challenged us to correct the principal defect of our founding, the plague of slavery. And it was an Italian who gave us our name: America. – George W. Bush, Weekly Radio Address, February 19, 2005

Page 17: Week Three Part I

Sweet Style = you-orientation; many contractions; use of the active voice

• Tonight my friends, I ask you to join me for the next 100 days in telling John Kerry’s story and promoting his plans. Let every person in this hall and all across America say to him what he has always said to America: Send Me. The bravery that the men who fought by his side saw in battle I’ve seen in the political arena. When I was President, John Kerry showed courage and conviction on crime, on welfare reform, on balancing the budget at a time when those priorities were not exactly a way to win a popularity contest in our party.– Bill Clinton, Democratic Convention Address, 2004

Page 18: Week Three Part I

Metaphor in Rhetoric

A metaphor explicitly or implicitly identifies one phenomenon with another phenomenon from which the first is literally distinct.

Metaphors are offered as a source of illumination and reference. They provide perspective and orientation.

Metaphors are most successful when they associate something unknown or ambiguous with something familiar and specific. Adapted from “Making Sense of Metaphors,” by Bernard J.

Hibbitts, Cardozo Law Review

Page 19: Week Three Part I

Analyzing Metaphors

We analyze metaphors because they can provide insight into speaker motive, audience perception, and/or persuasive effect.

Metaphors can be understood as a representation consisting of two parts. Tenor—subject of the metaphor Vehicle—the comparative device that

“drives” the meaning of the metaphor

Page 20: Week Three Part I

Archetypal Metaphors

Water & Sea Light & Dark Human Body War Structural

Animals Family Above & Below Forward &

Backward Natural

Phenomena Sexuality

Page 21: Week Three Part I

Figures of Speech

The use of language outside of its normal, denotative meaning. Can be used to amplify, beautify, enhance, give force to, a rhetorical use of language.

Literally hundreds of figures of speech.

Page 22: Week Three Part I

Figures of Speech

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love.” John F. Kennedy—alliteration

Page 23: Week Three Part I

Figures of Speech

“We shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end. We shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills. We shall never surrender.” Winston Churchill—anaphora

Page 24: Week Three Part I

Figures of Speech

“Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.” Barry Goldwater—antithesis

Page 25: Week Three Part I

Figures of Speech

“For Brutus, as you know, was Caesar's angel.Judge, O you gods, how dearly Caesar loved him.” William Shakespeare—apostrophe

Page 26: Week Three Part I

Figures of Speech

“Thy kingdom come, thy will be done.” assonance

Page 27: Week Three Part I

Figures of Speech

“Those gallant men will remain often in my thoughts and in my prayers always.” Douglas MacArthur—chiasmus

Page 28: Week Three Part I

Figures of Speech

“My vegetable love should growVaster than empires, and more slow;An hundred years should got to praiseThine eyes and on thine forehead gaze;Two hundred to adore each breast,But thirty thousand to the rest.” Andrew Marvell—hyperbole

Page 29: Week Three Part I

Figures of Speech

“I must be cruel only to be kind.”William Shakespeare—oxymoron

Page 30: Week Three Part I

Figures of Speech

“What a pity that youth must be wasted on the young.” George Bernard Shaw—paradox

Page 31: Week Three Part I

Figures of Speech

“England expects every man to do his duty.” Lord Nelson—

personification

Page 32: Week Three Part I

Figures of Speech

“The U.S. won three gold medals” synecdoche

Page 33: Week Three Part I

COMM 401Interpreting Strategic DiscourseWeek Three

Narrative

Page 34: Week Three Part I
Page 35: Week Three Part I
Page 36: Week Three Part I

Narrative in Ancient Rhetoric

Romans took Aristotle’s four parts of a speech and added three more.

Aristotle’s four parts: Proem Statement Argument Epilogue

Page 37: Week Three Part I

Roman Rhetoric & Narrative Roman’s Seven Parts:

Exordium (introduction) Arouse attention; orient listeners; conciliate Partition (preview) Narration Proof Refutation Digression (review) Peroration▪ The place for emotional appeals

Page 38: Week Three Part I

Burke’s Dramatism

Dramatism: The foundation of dramatism is the concept of motive: the reasons why people do the things they do.

Burke believed that all of life was drama (in the sense of fiction), and we may discover the motives of actors (people) by looking for their particular type of motivation in action and discourse.

Pentad—treats language and thought primarily as modes of action:

Act—What happened? Agency—How do agents act?

What means do they use? Agent—Who was involved?

What roles did they play? Scene—Where is the act

happening? What is the background situation?

Purpose—Why do the agents act?

Page 39: Week Three Part I

Interpreting Narratives

Narrative Criticism is best understood by: Understanding the components of

rhetorical narratives; Examining the narrative tests that can

be applied to rhetorical texts; Exploring the different narrative

approaches: myth & psychoanalysis

Page 40: Week Three Part I

Narrative Components

Characters: Believability; plausibility; credibility Theme: Expression of theme; Resolution of

theme Structure: Organization of the narrative;

time/space dimensions of the narrative Narrative Voice: Who tells the narrative;

perspective and orientation toward the narrative Peripeteia: Plot change; moment of meaning and

shift in the plot Style: use of language, imagery, tropes, etc. in a

narrative.

Page 41: Week Three Part I

Narrative Tests

Narrative probability: the story hangs together as a good story—all the elements are there, it is credible, etc.

Narrative fidelity: the story resonates and is a sound reflection/articulation of good reasons.

Page 42: Week Three Part I
Page 43: Week Three Part I
Page 44: Week Three Part I

Special Narratives—Myths

Myths are stories about heroes and villains who engage in a series of larger-than-life actions that have outcomes that provide lessons for living.

Myths are narratives that are not fully or literally true but that possess enough narrative fidelity to exert social power.

Types of myths: Origin/Creation myths Heroic myths God/Goddess myths Eschatological myths Social myths

Page 45: Week Three Part I

Name the Myth

Page 46: Week Three Part I

Name the Myth

Page 47: Week Three Part I

Name the Myth

Page 48: Week Three Part I

Name the Myth

Page 49: Week Three Part I

Psychoanalytic Interpretation Psychoanalysis is closely linked to narrative

criticism. It is a special type of narrative analysis that

interprets stories for their cultural tenets to assess the state of the human psyche.

Based in the teachings of Sigmund Freud—others include Alfred Adler, Carl Jung, Jacques Lacan.

Freud was concerned with the treatment of mental illness.

His theories are used to not only understand the mind, but also its products – literature, film, other discourses.

Page 50: Week Three Part I

Assumption of Psychoanalytic Analysis

Human thought and behavior are products of the interaction between the conscious and the subconscious. Id = unconscious and

unexplainable repository of needs and desires

Ego = conscious mind that reasons and restricts

Superego = storehouse of teachings, admonitions, social values

Page 51: Week Three Part I

Assumption of Psychoanalytic Analysis

The conscious and the unconscious are products of childhood.

Father is rival for mother’s love; fear of castration; Oedipus complex; father as source of superego.

Lacan = this childhood process is rooted in language acquisition.

Page 52: Week Three Part I

Assumption of Psychoanalytic Analysis

The Centrality of the Dream Metaphor

Media scholars especially focus on the power of dream metaphor to explain film and television.

Page 53: Week Three Part I

Tools of Psychoanalytic Interpretation

Identity themes: Finding in texts a theme by which the

spectator/reader identifies himself or herself

Oedipus complex: The effects of a continued attachment

to the mother figure. Eros and Thanatos:

How the conflict between life (eros) and death (thanatos) structures texts and meaning.

Page 54: Week Three Part I

Psychoanalytic Symbolism

The search for psychoanalytic meaning in both verbal and visual symbols.

Page 55: Week Three Part I
Page 56: Week Three Part I
Page 57: Week Three Part I