weekly assessments and 1st benchmark test results

8/2/2019 Weekly Assessments and 1st Benchmark Test Results

1/20

LOGO1

A Presentation for

7th Grade Language Arts Teachers

November 9-10, 2011

Weekly Assessments& 1st Benchmark

Results


2/20

LOGO

Data in Practice

When the cook tastes the soup, that's

formative evaluation. When the guests

taste the soup that is summative

evaluation. ~ Bob Stake

2


3/20

LOGO

Oct21 Assessment

Objectives Questions - % Incorrect1

Oct21 Assessment

By Objectives 2.01,5.01, 6.01 - % Rating2

Oct21 Assessment # of Non-Proficient3

1st Benchmark Results Class Overall %4

1st Benchmark Results - % By Objectives5

OverviewOverview

What Now?6


4/20

LOGO

What are the results? What pops out?1

How would you summarize the data?2

What do the results mean for your school? district?3

How will we reteach those who have not learned

or mastered the objectives?4

GuidingGuiding

QuestionsQuestions


5/20

LOGO

Presentations

October 21

st

Assessments

5


6/20

LOGO

Oct. 21st Assessment

Class Teacher Obj. Questions %Incorrect

G HB A 2.01 #13 100

C1 HB B 2.01 #6, #10 100

S HB B 2.01 #13 100

L HB A 5.01 #19 93.8

B HB A 5.01 #15, #20 93.8

C2 HB C 2.01 #13 94.1

OHB C 2.01 #13 94.4

B HB C 2.01 #13 91.3

R HB C 2.01 #13 95.0

E HB A 2.01, 501 #13, #19 93.8

6


7/20LOGO

Oct. 21st Assessment

Class Teacher Obj. 201 Obj.5.01

Obj.6.01

OverallRating

G HB A 43.08 38.5 49.1 44.1

C1 HB B 41.7 44.4 32.1 39.2

S HB B 40.3 48.0 42.0 43.2

L HB A 38.4 19.8 42.0 34.1

B HB A 38.4 20.8 38.4 33.1

C2 HB C 60.5 65.7 61.3 62.4

OHB C 38.1 29.6 37.3 35.3

B HB C 46.6 56.5 46.6 49.6

R HB C 56.4 71.7 62.1 63.0

E HB A 31.3 26.0 37.5 31.9

7


8/20LOGO

Oct. 21st AssessmentNumber of Students Non-Proficient

Class Teacher Total #ofStudents

Obj. 201 Obj.5.01

Obj.6.01

Griffin HB Griffin 16 14 15 12

Cox HB Cox 12 11 12 12

Snow HB Cox 17 15 14 14

Lee HB Griffin 16 14 15 14

Burwell HB Griffin 16 15 15 14

Crowder HB Ruffin 17 10 12 9

Orbita HB Ruffin 18 15 17 18

Bayley HB Ruffin 23 19 16 19

Ruffin HB Ruffin 20 14 9 10

Eley HB Griffin 16 14 15 16

8


9/20LOGO

Presentations

October 28

th

Assessments

9


10/20LOGO

Oct. 28th Assessment


G HB A 2.01 #6, #10 66.7

C1 HB B 2.01 #10 68.4

S HB B 5.01 #15, #20 93.8

L HB A 2.01 #10 73.3

B HB A 2.01 #6, #10 63.6

C2 HB C 2.01 #10 57.1

OHB C 2.01 #14 81.1

B HB C 2.01 #14 100

R HB C 2.01 #6, #10 55.6

E HB A 2.01 #15, #10 66.7

10


11/20LOGO



G HB A 2.01 #6, #10 66.7

2.01 #9 57.1

1.02 #8 38.1

2.01 #4 33.3

2.01 #5 33.3

2.01 #12 33.3

11


12/20

LOGO


Class Teacher Obj.1.02

Obj.2.01

Obj.6.01

OverallRating

G HB A 47.6 38.1 61.9 49.2

C1 HB B 31.6 42.1 26.3 33.3

S HB B 38.4 20.8 38.4 33.1

L HB A 46.7 6.7 40 31.1

B HB A 54.5 36.4 81.8 57.6

C2 HB C 64.3 50 64.3 59.5

OHB C 42.9 47.6 95.2 61.9

B HB C 0 0 41.2 13.7

R HB C 38.9 44.4 44.4 42.6

E HB A 30.4 73.9 78.3 60.9

12


13/20

LOGO

Oct. 28th AssessmentNumber of Students Non-Proficient

Class Teacher Total #ofStudents

Obj.1.02 Obj.2.01 Obj.6.01

G HB A 21 11 13 8

C1 HB B 19 13 11 14

S HB B 16 15 15 14

L HB A 15 8 14 9

B HB A 11 5 7 2

C2 HB C 14 5 7 5

OHB C 21 12 11 1

B HB C 17 17 17 10

R HB C 20 17 10 5

E HB A 23 16 6 5

13


14/20

LOGO

Presentations

1

st

Benchmark TestResults

14


15/20

LOGO

1st Benchmark Test

Results

Class Teacher Total # of Students Class %

G HB A 23 50

C1 HB B 19 42

S HB B 17 49

L HB A 23 48

B HB A 19 51

C2 HB C 19 62

OHB C 18 44B HB C 21 60

R HB C 24 64

E HB A 20 44

15


16/20

LOGO

1st Benchmark Test

Results

Class Teacher Obj. 1.0 Obj. 2.0 Obj. 3.0 Obj. 5.0 Obj. 5.0 Obj. 6.0

G HB A 43.9 54.5 56.1 50 40.9 56.4

C1 HB B 26.7 60 41.7 43.8 44 44

S HB B 39.8 61.1 40.7 59.7 50 52

L HB A 36.5 48.8 44.4 56 47.6 58.1B HB A 37.7 57.9 53.5 53.9 50.5 54.7

C2 HB C 59.6 55.3 53.5 78.9 48.4 77.9

OHB C 41.7 54.2 35.2 50 43.3 46.7

B HB C 46 65.5 53.2 70.2 54.3 75.2R HB C 52.8 64.6 56.9 79.2 55 80

E HB A 40 51.2 37.5 52.5 44 45

16


17/20

LOGO

1st Benchmark Test ResultsClass Teacher Objectives Questions # of Students

Correct

Griffin HB Griffin 2.01a, 5.02a #8, #17 3, 2

Lee HB Griffin 1.02a,3.01g #11&13, #26 4 & 4, 2

Burwell HB Griffin 2.01a,1.02c #8, #9 2,3

Eley HB Griffin 2.01a,5.02c,3.01c 8,17,29 44

Cox HB Cox 5.01b,5.01d,1.02e,1.02a,5.02c

2,3,10,13,17 3,4,4,1,4,4

Snow HB Cox 2.01a, 1.02c,1.02e,5.02a,5.02c,

8,9,11,15,17 1,4,4,3,3

Crowder HB Ruffin 2.01c,2.01a,5.02a,5.02c 7,8,15,17 3,3,2,3

Orbita HB Ruffin 5.01b,1.02c,1.02a 2,9,13 4,4,4

Bayley HB Ruffin 5.02c 17 3

Ruffin HB Ruffin 5.02c 17 5

17


18/20

LOGO

Plans for Corrective Teaching

1. Status Quo; grouping: 2H + 2L =

peer teaching1

2. Learning Centers: same objectives

but different tasks2

3. Regrouping of students based on

the objectives and teacher mastery

3

What Now?What Now?

STARS - READING4


19/20

LOGO

Present October 28th Weekly Assessment Data1

Answer the Guiding Questions2

No Need to Reinvent the Wheel.

Use this PowerPoint template.3

For Nov. 10For Nov. 10thth

MeetingMeeting


20/20

weekly assessments and 1st benchmark test results

Documents