weight reduction of heavy duty truck components …/media/files/autosteel/great designs in...
TRANSCRIPT
GDIS2017
Weight Reduction of Heavy Duty Truck Components
Through Geometry and Quenching
Gracious Ngaile
North Carolina State University
Department of Mechanical And Aerospace Engineering
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 3
Presentation Outline
1. Introduction and research motivation
2. Research objectives
3. Weight saving through hollow shafts for power transmission
4. Feasibilities of producing hollow shafts for power
transmission
5. Heat treatments and their contribution to weight reduction
6. Concluding remarks
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 4
Research Motivation
Weight
Reduction
Advanced Combustion Engines
Aerodynamics Others
Increase Fuel Efficiency
1. Material substitution
2. Part geometry change
3. Heat treatment schemes
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 5
Research Motivation
The powertrain for HDV
account for 48% weight
distribution. https://freightliner.com/demand-detroit/
• Currently the power transmission shafts and axles used in most HDV
are solid
• Is it feasible to manufacture hollow shafts in a cost effective manner?
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 6
Research Objective
• Investigate the potential of forging lightweight
hollow power transmission shafts for heavy duty
vehicles
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 7
Loads Acting on Heavy Duty Truck, Class 8
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 8
FEA Study: Potential Weight Reduction of a Gear Box
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 9
FEA Study: Potential Weight Reduction of a Gear
Box
• Dead weight at the center of the shaft
• Small increases to OD can eliminate large
amount of material at the center of the shaft
Solid Input Shaft von-Mises Stress
Hollow Input Shaft von-Mises Stress
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 10
Hollow Input Shaft Parametric Study Hollow Input Shaft Stress and Mass vs Shape
• The weight saving for using a 38 mm OD
input shaft with wall/diameter ratio of 0.3
is 0.5 kg ~ 13%
• Greater weight savings possible as shaft
diameter is increased
• Greater weight savings if the ID is tailored
for the different areas on the shaft
• Slight modifications to the transmission
case and gears required
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 11
Rear Axle FEA Study - Hollow Axle Shaft
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 12
Rear Axle FEA Study - Hollow Axle Shaft
Hollow Axle Shaft von-Mises Stress
Solid Axle Shaft von-Mises Stress
• Heavy part (over 21 kg)
• 2-4 axle shafts per truck
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 13
Rear Axle Shaft Parametric Study
Hollow Axle Shaft Stress and Mass vs Shape
• The weight saving for using a 47 mm OD axle
shaft with wall/diameter ratio of 0.24 is 5 kg
~24%
• Greater weight savings possible as shaft
diameter is increased
• Minor modifications must be made to the axle
housing and bearings and differential gears
• Forging may provide a practical solution to
creating long hollow parts
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 14
Potential Weight Reduction
• Axle shaft weight may be reduced by 5.6 to 7.35 kg (12.3 to 16.2
lbs)
• The input shaft weight may be reduced by 1.75 kg (3.85 lbs)
• The output shaft weight may be reduced by 1.7 to 2.2 kg (3.74 to
4.84 lbs)
• The countershaft weight may be reduced by 0.5 kg (1.1 lbs)
• A truck with a tandem rear axle and three countershafts can
have its weight reduced by a total of about 38.4 kg (86.6 lbs) by
using hollow shaft geometry
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 15
Proposed Forging of Axle Shafts from Hollow Tubes
https://www.sypristechnologies.com/products
Conventional forging of
axle shafts
1. Employ existing forging technologies
2. Employ forging machine architecture
3. Employ induction heating technologies
4. Comparable cycle time to forging
Key
Strategies
* Differential Heating Concept*
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 16
Proposed Forging of Axle Shafts from Hollow Tubes- FEA
-
Tubular
blank
1st
Induction
heating 2nd
Upsetting 3rd
Flanging
Process
Sequence
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 17
Proposed Forging of Axle Shafts from Hollow Tubes - FEA
-
• Optimal differential
heating patterns
• Part strength
characteristics
• Interface friction
• Other
R & D
Tubular
blank
1st
Induction Heating 2nd
Upsetting
3rd
Flanging
Process
Sequence
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 18
Proposed Forging of Axle Shafts from Hollow Tubes - FEA
-
• The maximum strain attained is 6.5 mm/mm which is acceptable for hot forging
• Due to oxide, the tube wall will not completely close during upsetting, thus a small
through hole will have to be machined as part of the finishing operations
• Experimental verifications are needed to assess the feasibility of the process
• Induction heating and material flow can be optimized to reduce concentrated strain
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 19
Proposed Forging of Pinion Gear Shafts from Hollow Tubes
Proposed Sequence
1. Open die extrusion
2. Induction heating
3. Upsetting to form a solid top part
4. Heading operation
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 20
Proposed Forging of Pinion Gear shafts from Hollow Tubes
1st
Open die
extrusion
2nd
Induction
heating
3rd
Upsetting
4th
Heading
Tubular
blank
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 21
Proposed Forging of Pinion Gear Shafts from Hollow Tubes
• Optimal differential
heating patterns
• Part strength
characteristics
• Interface friction
• Cycle time
• Other
R & D
1st
Open Die
extrusion
2nd
Induction
heating
3rd
Upsetting
4th
Heading
Tubular
blank
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 22
Proposed Forging of Pinion Gear Shafts from Hollow Tubes
• The maximum strain attained is 5.3 mm/mm acceptable for hot forging
• Due to oxide formation, the tube will not close during upsetting, thus a small
through hole will have to be machined as part of finishing operations
• Experimental verifications are needed to assess the feasibility of the process
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 23
Proposed Forging of Main Shaft from Hollow
Tubes
Proposed Sequence
1. Induction heating
2. Upsetting to form a solid top
3. Flanging operation
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 24
Proposed Forging of Main shaft from Hollow Tubes
1st
Induction
heating
2nd
Upsetting 3rd
Flanging
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 25
Proposed Forging of Main Shaft from Hollow Tubes
1st Induction Heating
2nd
Upsetting
3rd
Flanging
• Optimal differential
heating patterns
• Part strength
characteristics
• Interface friction
• Cycle time
• Other
R & D
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 26
Proposed Forging of Main Shaft from Hollow Tubes
Strain Distribution of
the Main Shaft
• The maximum strain attained is 6.39
mm/mm which is acceptable for hot
forging
• Due to oxide formation, the tube will not
close during upsetting, thus a through
hole will be drilled as part of finishing
operations
• Experimental verifications are needed to
assess the feasibility of the process
• Induction heating and material flow can
be optimized to reduce concentrated
strain
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 27
Innovative Heat Treatment Approaches for Weight Reduction - Theory
Residual Stress Induced by Intensive Quenching[7] Rapid vs Slow Cooling Rates[7]
He
at
Tre
atm
en
t P
ara
dig
m [6
]
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 28
Innovative Heat Treatment Approaches for Weight Reduction
Removed Mutual System Coupling Full-Float
Axle Shaft
Semi-Float
Axle Shaft
Torsional
Load
Bending Load
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 29
Innovative Heat Treatment Approaches for Weight Reduction
Semi-Float Alternating Stresses
• Large Increase in the Residual Compressive Surface Stresses
• Reduction in the Alternating Axial Stresses (Semi-Float Axle)
• Decrease in Required Shaft Diameter (3% Weight Reduction)
• Increased Hardness and Strength in Core
Residual Stresses
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 30
Conclusions
• A truck with a tandem rear axle and three countershafts can have its weight
reduced by a total of about 38.4 kg (86.6 lbs) by using hollow shaft geometry
• A forging sequence for hollow shaft based on differential heating of tubular
billet is proposed. The sequence includes three major operations:
i. Heating a section of a tubular stock via induction heating
ii. Upset the heated section into a solid rod
iii. Shape the solid section into a flange or a desired shape by further upsetting
• The proposed forging sequence can be accomplished using conventional tooling
and forging presses/equipment
• Modern heat treating techniques can be employed to improve surface stresses
and reduce component weight
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 31
Acknowledgements Students who worked on this project:
James Lowrie, Graduate student
Hao Pang, Graduate student
Aman Akataruzzaman, Graduate student
Joseph Jonkind, Undergraduate student
Steve Henkel, Undergraduate student
Frederic Morrow, Undergraduate student
FIERF and AISI for sponsoring this project
Forging companies and truck manufacturers for providing valuable information for this
project:
Fox Valley Forge, Mid-West Forge, Sona BLW Precision Forge, GKN Sanford, Volvo
Powertrain Manufacturing at Hagerstown MD, and Cleveland Truck Manufacturing
Plant (Freightliner)
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 32
References
[1] Transportation Energy Data book, Volume 30:
http://info.ornl.gov/sites/publications/files/Pub31202.pdf
[2] http://www.dieselcrankshaft.com/crankshaft/Vehicle%20crankshaft/2013-05-
13/11173.html
[3] M. Hagedorn, K. Weinert, Manufacturing of composite workpieces with rolling tools,
Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Volumes 153–154, 10 November 2004, Pages
323-329
[4] Brad Fair, Advancement in radial forging, Forge Fair, 2015 Cleveland OH.
[5] Neugebauer, Reimund, Bernd Lorenz, Matthias Kolbe, and Roland Glaß. Hollow drive
shafts-innovation by forming technology. No. 2002-01-1004. SAE Technical Paper, 2002.
[6] Inoue, T. (2002). Metallo-Thermo-Mechanics - Application to Quenching. In G. Totten, M.
Howes, & T. Inoue (Eds.), Handbook of Residual Stress and Deformation of Steel (pp. 296–
311). ASM International.
[7] Intensive Quenching Technology for Advanced Weapon Systems” Phase 1 Report:
Cooperative Agreement Award W15QKN-06-2-0105. December 18, 2007
#GDIS | #SteelMatters 33
For More Information
Dr. Gracious Ngaile
North Carolina State University
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace
Engineering
911 Oval Drive, 3160 EB3
Raleigh, NC 27695