welcome to the naygn professional development workshop 2013 · –coordinate with areva...
TRANSCRIPT
#NAYGN2013
Welcome to the NAYGN Professional Development
Workshop 2013
May 12-14, 2013
Grand Hyatt Washington
#NAYGN2013
Welcome & Opening Remarks
Kristin Zaitz President NAYGN
#NAYGN2013
Happy Mother’s Day
#NAYGN2013
2013 Conference Theme: Securing the Future of Nuclear: Safety, Technology, and Leadership
NAYGN Vision: Developing Leaders to Energize the Future of Nuclear
#NAYGN2013
#5 - Diversity
#NAYGN2013
#4 - Energy
#NAYGN2013
#3 - Opportunities
#NAYGN2013
#2 - Relationships
#NAYGN2013
#1 – Relax!
Thank You
#NAYGN2013
Nuclear Safety and Security: How We Got Here, What We’re Doing and Where We’re Going
Brent Tolan
PD Committee Manager NAYGN
#NAYGN2013
Securing Nuclear
Michael Weber Deputy Executive Director for Operations
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
#NAYGN2013
Overview – Securing Nuclear
• NRC Mission
• Early Days
• Current Framework
• Securing Nuclear
#NAYGN2013
Early Days – Ending World War II
#NAYGN2013
Atoms for Peace - 1953
#NAYGN2013
International Atomic Energy Agency - 1957
#NAYGN2013
Early Safeguards
#NAYGN2013
NUMEC – 1965
#NAYGN2013
Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty – 1968
#NAYGN2013
U.S. Voluntary Offer – 1977
#NAYGN2013
Current Framework
#NAYGN2013
Securing Nuclear
#NAYGN2013
9/11 Physical Security
9/13 Cyber Warfare
Herb Richardson
Vice President, Security and Loss Prevention
AREVA North America
:
#NAYGN2013
Physical Security Protection (Why We Do It – to protect our people and our infrastructure)
• Evaluate and improve upon facility
access protocols that may impact safety and protection of personnel and make recommendations for improvement
• Evaluate building and site security and recommend possible improvements
• Evaluate and improve structural integrity of Nuclear Facilities
• Harden security protocols
Office of Security and Loss Prevention-
#NAYGN2013
Protecting Facilities Here and Abroad
• Security for U. S. Enriched Uranium Plants and India Solar
and possible Nuclear projects, by developing security site-plans access controls, and protection protocols against electronic intrusion, physical intrusion, kidnappings and terrorism.
Office of Security and Loss Prevention
View of the completed facility in 2017
#NAYGN2013
Facility and Access Security Controls
• Establish and implement a uniform color coded
structured badge access policy, and throughout North America:
– Employee access
– Escorted visitor access
– Unescorted visitor access
– Foreign national access
– Facilities management access (i.e. contractors and maintenance)
• Administer oversight procedures for Access Control and Fit for Duty requirements
Office of Security and Loss Prevention-
#NAYGN2013
Crisis Management
• Evaluate site evacuation plans and all emergency
protocols identifying and implementing best practices
• Identify and/or establish Continuity of Operation Plans
• Establish emergency response protocol
– Coordinate with AREVA Communications re: Emergency Communications Protocol
– Coordinate with appropriate emergency operations centers, first responders and appropriate federal and state agencies
– Coordinate with Crisis Management and Emergency response center in France
Office of Security and Loss Prevention-
#NAYGN2013
Investigate and Protect Against Loss of Property and
Information • Continue to review and enhance inventory controls in
place to prevent property loss
• Continue to review security protocols in place designed to protect proprietary information and intellectual property
Office of Security and Loss Prevention
#NAYGN2013
300,000 stolen documents from Boeing in 2008 resulting in 2 Billion in lost revenue
A DIGITAL WAR
• Cyber warfare is the new terrorism.
-FBI Director Robert S. Mueller
• The United States is at risk of a cyber Pearl Harbor.
-Former Secretary of Defense
#NAYGN2013
• There is no such thing as perfect security
• Companies who have made responsible and sustainable investments continue to be compromised
The Facts
#NAYGN2013
• Different Threat Actors Have Different Motivations... And Tactics
• To combat advanced attackers you need to know what they are looking for and how they operate.
Threats and Motivations
#NAYGN2013
Top 3 Threats for 2013
• Phishing
• Mobile Malware
• Malicious Code
#NAYGN2013
Cyber Attacks are On the Rise
• Malicious attacks by cyber criminals increased by 81% in 2011
• The average number of successful attacks per week continues to increase year after year
– 2010 to 2011: +44%
– 2011 to 2012: +42%
• Organizations reported an average loss of $8.9%
#NAYGN2013
• A surprise attack on energy infrastructure could cause widespread blackouts, cripple power plants, knock out the transmission grid
• Malicious software infecting the computers of electric utilities could cause turbines at power plants to spin out of control, potentially destroying them
Corporate Attacks Hint of a Potential ‘Cyber Pearl Harbor’
#NAYGN2013
Cyber Security
• Support the effort to prevent cyber security breaches and make recommendations for improvement
• Coordinate federal and state sponsored initiatives that may impact or support improved cyber protection
• Liaison with FBI, DHS, NSA and DOD on Intel related state sponsored attacks
• Establish and maintain international working relationships
Office of Security and Loss Prevention- March 2012
#NAYGN2013
Prevention is Our Responsibility
• Educate
– Stay current of potential malware, spam, and phishing schemes
• Protect
– Home and Office
• Identify
– Potential problems and bad players
• Report
– Any areas or reason for concern
#NAYGN2013
Impact of Fukushima on Improving Safety Margins
Joseph Pollock Vice President
Nuclear Energy Institute
© 2007 Dominion
#NAYGN2013
Introduction / Overview
• U.S. Nuclear Industry Response
• NRC - Regulator Actions
• U.S. Industry Major Accomplishments
• Major Work in Progress / Challenges
• FLEX Initiative
40
#NAYGN2013
U.S. Nuclear Industry Response
• Confirm safety of U.S. reactors
– Verify operability and usability of portable mitigation equipment (B.5.b) already on site
• Establish communication focal point
– NEI, INPO, EPRI, U.S. nuclear utilities
• Establish factual basis for action based on understanding of the events in Japan
41
#NAYGN2013
U.S. Nuclear Industry Response (cont’d)
• INPO Initiatives
– Performed in-depth examination of accident mitigation with no AC power
– Calculated time to used fuel pool boiling
– Implemented stronger fuel pool equipment protections
– Performing Review Visits initially now performing assist visits
42
#NAYGN2013
NRC – Regulator Actions
• NRC actions are broken into 3 tiers
– Tier 1: without unnecessary delay
• Completed by 2016
– Tier 2: require critical skill sets or further technical assessment
• To be evaluated
– Tier 3: require further long-term study/ scoping
• To be evaluated
43
#NAYGN2013
U.S. Industry’s Major Accomplishments
B.5.b equipment readiness affirmed by inspection and test
Initial inspections completed for flooding and seismic vulnerabilities
Station blackout procedures and equipment readiness validated
Periodic maintenance and drills verified to exist or established for B.5.b equipment
NRC endorsed the FLEX strategy
Spent fuel pool monitoring enhanced
44
#NAYGN2013
U.S. Industry’s Major Accomplishments
FLEX equipment specified, purchased, arriving at sites
RRC (regional response centers) approved
RRC Equipment being ordered
Event investigation with TEPCO completed
Flooding guidance established, walk-downs completed
Seismic guidance established, walk-downs completed
Flooding hazards—scope and methodology approved first set of 22 plants performed
45
#NAYGN2013
Major Work in Progress
• Seismic hazards—alternate methodologies in approval process with NRC
• Developing site-specific FLEX strategies
• Developing integration of EOPs, SAMGs, EDMGs and FLEX
• Reliable spent fuel pool wide-range level instrumentation in design
• Land contamination / containment pressure
• Regional Response Center / Industry Infrastructure
46
#NAYGN2013
Flex Strategy
• Origins from B.5.b
• Provides a Means to Respond to Extreme Events Known and Unknown
• Sites Have Already Improved Safety Margins as a Result
#NAYGN2013
Flex Strategy
• Provides Diverse and Flexible Means to Protect Fuel
– Provide Cooling for the Core
– Protect the Containment
– Provide Water Makeup to the Spent Fuel Pool
#NAYGN2013
Three Phase Approach
• Initial Coping Relying on Installed Equipment
• Transition from Installed to Onsite FLEX Equipment
• Obtain Additional Capabilities and Redundancy from Offsite
#NAYGN2013
Flex Onsite Equipment Staging
• N+1 Provides Redundant Equipment
• Diverse Storage Locations
• Reasonable Protection of Equipment
• Deployment of Equipment
• Common Electrical and Mechanical Connections
#NAYGN2013
Diverse Options
• Provide Emergency Response Organization a multitude of Options
• Allows deployment of additional mitigation capabilities in a swift and efficient manner
• Provides Preplan responses for a wide range of Beyond Design Basis Events
• Symptom base procedures allows training to be used in any event.
#NAYGN2013
Flex Redundancy
#NAYGN2013
Consideration of Potential Failure Modes
of Baseline FLEX Strategies
Functional
Failure Mode
Failure Cause Leading
to Core Damage
Relevant Contingency
Provisions of NEI 12-06 Early Reactor Core Cooling
Fails
RCIC/AFW fails to start Procedural direction to locally
initiate RCIC/AFW
RCIC/AFW fails to operate until
portable FLEX equipment can be
deployed
Procedures for manual operation
of RCIC/AFW
Procedural direction to align
portable pump, even if transition
is not yet planned
DC control power lost Procedural direction to manually
initiate RCIC/AFW
RCIC/AFW water source
unavailable
Robust source of water initially
required
Essentially indefinite supply of
water
Instrumentation inadequate Plant-specific reference source
required to identify all available
sources for required parameters,
including self-powered instrument
readings (w/o DC power)
LOCA occurs Margin provided in BWR
RPV/RCS makeup capabilities
Margin in PWR SG makeup rates
to support cooldown
#NAYGN2013
Consideration of Potential External Hazard Impairments to FLEX
Hazard
Hazard-induced
Impairment
Relevant Contingency
Provisions of NEI 12-06 Seismic
(applicable to all plants)
Seismic damage to electrical equipment,
e.g., DC control power
Procedural direction to manually initiate
RCIC/AFW
Plant-specific reference source required
to identify all available sources for
required parameters, including self-
powered instrument readings (w/o DC
power)
Seismic damage to portable on-site
FLEX equipment
Structure provides reasonable protection
or storage outside
Portable equipment secured
Seismic interactions considered
Impairment to onsite transportation Transportation equipment reasonably
protected
Review transportation route for soil
liquefaction potential
Capability to open electric doors without
normal AC power
Seismic damage to plant structures At least one connection point and
associated deployment location requires
access to only robust structures
Seismic-induced internal flood Connection and access consider
potential for failure of non-qualified
water sources
Seismic-induced groundwater intrusion Water removal provision without AC
power
Seismic-induced loss of downstream
dam required for water supply
Strategies for providing water assuming
unqualified downstream dam fails
Impairment of delivery from regional
response center
Identify plant-specific strategies for
delivery accounting for potential seismic
damage to the surrounding
infrastructure
#NAYGN2013
Training
• On-site staff will be trained on the deploying and utilization of the equipment including timed drills
• Emergency Response Leadership including Senior Reactor Operators, Emergency Duty Directors and facilities leads will be trained on strategies and deployment
#NAYGN2013
Industry Coordination & Sharing
• Established RRC to provide additional equipment and resources from outside of the utility involved in the event
• Expanded current sharing practices between utilities to include emergency equipment
• Expand current parts database ( Rapid) to include emergency equipment
• INPO improved Emergency Response Center to coordinate industry response and support
#NAYGN2013
Offsite Support
• 2 Regional Response Centers
– Provide Additional Capability and Redundancy of Equipment and Supplies
– Ability to Mobilize and begin delivery of equipment
• 65 Commercial Nuclear Power Sites
– Complete list of Equipment Available at each Site
#NAYGN2013
Regional Response Center Locations
U.S. Industry Post-Fukushima Actions
59
Plus Industry
Response Capability
and Filtering Strategy
#NAYGN2013
Break 10 to 10:30 a.m.
Constitution Ballroom