welfare equine focus osteoarthritis canine times...
TRANSCRIPT
10 Veterinary Times
PACK mules play an essential
role in mountain tourism and
agriculture in the High Atlas
of Morocco and contrib-
ute significantly to the local
rural economy.
Harness sores and injuries
are a common health problem
with significant welfare implica-
tions in these remote areas
(Sells et al, 2010; Cousquer,
2011). Tethering injuries are
commonly seen in expedition
pack mules and arise where
the tether causes damage to the
underlying tissues. This article
reviews the aetiology of these
injuries and key points that must
be considered in developing
solutions to sustainably reduce
their incidence.
Three different potential
solutions were presented to
muleteers working for the Cen-
tre de Formation aux Métiers de
la Montagne (CFAMM) during a
300km, 12-day crossing of the
High Atlas in 2010 and in 2011.
Drawing on these experiences
and feedback from the mule-
teers, the three alternatives are
compared and evaluated.
Owners of expedition pack
animals feel the need to tether
their animals to prevent them
wandering off (Brager, 2005;
Cousquer, 2011; US Army,
2004). Plastic or nylon rope
is readily available in Morocco
and many other countries in the
developing world. It is cheap,
strong and durable and, when
knotted around the lower
limb of a mule, will prevent its
escape if secured to an immov-
able object, such as a tree,
fence post or stake (Figure 1).
Unfortunately, tethering sys-
tems made from wire, chain,
nylon or plastic rope, and other
synthetic materials, can easily
Developing solutions to expedition pack mule tethering injuries in the High Atlas
GLEN COUSQUERBSc(Hons), BVM&S, CertZooMed, PGDOE, MSc, MRCVS
HASSAN ALYAKINEDVM, PhD
continue an article begun in VT42.09 by looking
at the damage some methods of mule tethering
can cause and highlighting three alternatives
WELFARE EQUINE
cause damage to the underlying
tissues (Hadrill, 2002; Pearson
et al, 2003; Garrett, 2010;
SPANA, 2002). This occurs in
a number of ways. The tether
can move across the affected
area, rubbing the underlying
skin and produce a friction burn
(Thomsett, 1991) – with clinical
signs sometimes taking days or
weeks to appear (Knottenbelt
and McGarry, 2009; Figure 2).
Direct pressure applied to
a small surface area can also
cause damage where the nar-
row diameter of the material
used allows it to cut through
the skin and into the underlying
soft tissues (Figures 3 and 4).
Where the skin is damaged
the creation of a wound may
continued on page 12
Figure 1. This pack mule has been short-tethered using a length of thin plastic rope. The rope is tied around the mule’s right pastern and wrapped around a convenient tree stump. The muleteer is pulling on the head collar in an attempt to stop the mule pulling back on the tether. An old injury is visible over the mule’s left pastern.
these agents also differs between
individuals. The use of N-methyl-
D-aspartate (NMDA) inhibitor
amantadine, in combination with an
NSAID has been reported to have
SAMANTHA WOODS graduated with a pharmacology
degree from the University of Aberdeen in 1998 and
qualified from the University of Cambridge in 2003. After
four years in mixed practice, followed by a small animal
internship at Dick White Referrals, she completed a surgery
residency at the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies,
University of Edinburgh where she is now employed. In
2010 Sam gained the RCVS certificate in small
animal surgery and is now studying towards the DipECVS.
efficacy in the treatment of OA pain
(Lascelles et al, 2008).
Corticosteroid therapy and intra-
articular corticosteroids are not rec-
ommended for the treatment of
canine OA. Intra-articular therapy
may provide a temporary remission
of clinical signs, however, steroids
accelerate the catabolic processes
occurring in OA patients, leading
to an eventual worsening of the
disease process.
Other treatmentsOther documented treatments for
use in OA cases include pentosan
polysulphate, doxycyline, extracor-
poreal shockwave therapy, therapeutic
ultrasound and acupuncture. For all
these treatments there is little, or no,
scientific evidence to support their use.
In one clinical study hyaluronic
acid administered intra-articularly was
shown to effect an improvement in
dogs with OA, but this has not been
reproduced in further studies and the
analgesia provided was only tempo-
rary (Hellstrom et al, 2003).
ConclusionThe treatment of OA is complex and
requires a multimodal approach (Panel
1). Each dog has very different needs
and a good clinician should adapt his
or her approach to the individual case.
It is vitally important to ensure clients
are aware of the necessity to review
and alter therapies regularly, and that
treatment is in no way a “quick fix”.
Although a number of therapies are
available, scientifically proven clinical
trials are few and far between and the
evidence for a large number of sug-
gested therapies is lacking.
AcknowledgementsThank you to Dylan Clements and
Marge Chandler for their input and
images. All images remain the property
of The University of Edinburgh.
References and further reading
Abercromby R A, Innes J and May C (2006).
Arthritis. In BSAVA Manual of Canine and
Feline Musculoskeletal Disorders (1st edn),
BSAVA, Gloucester.
Fox S M and Millis D (2010). Multimodal Man-
agement of Canine Osteoarthritis (1st edn), Man-
son Publishing/The Veterinary Press, London.
Hellstrom L E, Carlsson C, Boucher J F and
Michanek P (2003). Intra-articular injec-
tions with high molecular weight sodium
hyaluronate as a therapy for canine arthritis,
Veterinary Record 153: 89-90.
Lascelles B D, Gaynor J S, Smith E S et al
(2008). Amantadine in a multimodal anal-
gesic regimen for alleviation of refractory
osteoarthritis pain in dogs, Journal of Veteri-
nary Internal Medicine 22: 53-59.
Marshall W G, Hazewinkel H A, Mullen D et
al (2010). The effect of weight loss on lame-
ness in obese dogs with osteoarthritis, Veteri-
nary Research Communications 34: 241-253.
Millis D L (2006) Nonsteroidal anti-inflam-
matory drugs, disease-modifying drugs, and
osteoarthritis, Veterinary Medicine supple-
ment: 9-19.
Roush J K, Cross A R, Renberg W C et al
n MANAGING THE OA-AFFLICTED DOG – from page nine
PANEL 1. MULTIMODAL
APPROACH OVERVIEW TO
MANAGING THE CANINE
OSTEOARTHRITIC PATIENT
1. Assess patient, stage the disease and ensure the client is on board.2. Adopt a weight loss plan for overweight animals.3. Consider the exercise regime.4. Provide analgesia (NSAID).5. Consider nutraceutical supple-mentation or prescription diet.6. Monitor clinical response – change regime if necessary.7. Consider further analgesia if “breakthrough” periods occurring.8. Consider salvage surgical pro-cedures if conservative therapy fails.
(2010). Evaluation of the effects of dietary
supplementation with fish oil omega 3 fatty
acids on weight bearing in dogs with osteo-
arthritis, Journal of The American Veterinary
Medical Association 236: 67-73.
Salter R B, Hamilton H W, Wedge J H et al
(1984). Clinical application of basic research
on continuous passive motion for disorders
and injuries of synovial joints: a preliminary
report of a feasibility study, Journal of Ortho-
paedic Research 1: 325-342.
Sparkes A H, Heiene R and Lascelles B D
X (2010). ISFM and AAFP consensus guide-
lines: long-term use of NSAIDs in cats, Jour-
nal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 12: 521.
Tobias K M and Johnston S A (2012). Veteri-
nary Surgery Small Animal (1st edn), Elsevier
Saunders, Missouri.
Veterinary Medicines Directorate (www.
vmd.defra.gov.uk/). n
FOCUS OSTEOARTHRITIS • CANINE
Tablets for Dogs
For further information please read the product data sheet or contact the manufacturer. Manufactured and distributed in NI by: Norbrook Laboratories Ltd, Station Works, Newry, Co. Down, BT35 6JP. Distributed in GB by: Norbrook Laboratories (GB) Ltd, 1 Saxon Way East, Oakley Hay Industrial Estate, Corby, NN18 9EX. Legal Category: UK: POM-V Mycinor Tablets for Dogs contain clindamycin.
• infected mouth cavity & dental infections• infected wounds and abscesses• pyoderma (skin conditions)• osteomyelitis (bone infection)
A broad-spectrum Clindamycin antibioticfor dogs, for the treatment of:
www.norbrook.com/products
back on their face!
Put the
1399
-SA
(D)-
v1-U
K-2
1/06
/12
NEW!
For more information
scan the code or visit
the website below
12 Veterinary Times
n DEVELOPING SOLUTIONS TO EXPEDITION PACK MULE TETHERING INJURIES IN THE HIGH ATLAS – from page 10
induce the owner to swap
the tethering to the other leg,
thus temporarily eliminating
the cause of any wound and
affording it an opportunity to
heal. Therefore, in time, inju-
ries appear on both forelimbs.
The presence of broken-off
pieces of nylon rope and other
foreign bodies or contamination
within a wound can, however,
delay healing (Knottenbelt,
2003; Cousquer, 2011). The
repeated and sustained nature
of these injuries results in con-
siderable remodelling of the
local tissues with many older
mules demonstrating scarring
around the entire circumfer-
ence of the pastern. Such indi-
viduals demonstrate varying
degrees of leukotrichia, where
the melanocytes associated
with the hair follicles have been
destroyed (Thomsett, 1991).
In extreme cases, all layers
of the epidermis, including the
basal tissues, are destroyed,
as occurs with second-degree
burns (Hanson, 2005) and
freeze branding (Farrell et al,
1966; Thomsett, 1991). The
destruction of hair follicles
results in the formation of a
hairless scar.
During a weekend veteri-
nary clinic in the Aït Bouguemez
Valley, where CFAMM, the
national mountain guide school,
is based, it was estimated that
less than 20 of the 324 mules
treated had no obvious sign of
tethering injuries (Elmouhaine,
pers comm). This is consistent
with the author’s estimate that
90 per cent or more of mules
working in the High Atlas have
such injuries.
Ropes tied above the fetlock
can also cause damage to the
epidermal and dermal tissues
– even the underlying tendons
(Hadrill, 2002). Fortunately,
tendon damage appears to be
relatively rare as the pastern
area is more commonly used
for tethering. However, the inci-
dence of injuries to the tendons,
arising through blunt trauma and
compression, where no skin
damage is visible, may be under-
reported, given the absence of
an external wound.
Tethering injuries are, at best,
WELFARE EQUINE
Figure 5. An owner is shown how a cotton hobble can be attached to the forelimbs
(usually over the pastern, which has been left free here to show the granulating tethering injury provoked by a plastic
rope). The cotton hobble is wider and softer than nylon rope and less likely to cause damage to underlying tissues.
TABLE 1. Key factors in developing a sustainable tethering system for expedition pack mules
Factor Explanation
Secure The tether must prevent mules from escaping
Strength and durability
The tether must withstand prolonged use and weathering
Cost The tether must be affordable
Simplicity The tether must not be overly complicated to use and should be easy to apply and undo
Locally produced
The tether should be produced locally and easily made from materials not requiring importation
Maintenance The tether should be easy to clean and maintain
Technical factors
Natural materials
The tether should not irritate the underlying tissues and should not be made from artifi cial materials such as rubber, nylon or plastic
Atraumatic The tether should be free from sharp edges and as wide as possible to maximise the surface area over which force is applied
Non-constrictive
The tether should not constrict tissues. Slip knots should be avoided as should systems that allow owners to over tighten the attachment
Figure 2. A strip of canvas has been used to form a bracelet as part of a hobbling system on this young mule. The material has been placed above the hocks and been allowed to rub, producing extensive friction burns.
Figure 4. The remote nature of the High Atlas can mean skills, knowledge, understanding and access to good equipment are very limited. This mule has been reshod by a local farrier, who did not have the skills or knowledge to deal adequately with this overgrown hoof. This refl ects the general lack of equine husbandry skills and knowledge in remote mountainous areas. The mule is hobbled with a worn piece of plastic rope that has been over-tightened over the mule’s pasterns.
Figure 3 left). This mule is tethered using a fi ne-gauge nylon rope secured with a self-tightening slip knot above the pastern. The dorsal aspect of the canon shows evidence of hair loss and depigmentation. Bands of depigmentation are also evident over the pastern refl ecting chronic trauma to this area.
abcd Metacam contains meloxicam. Prescription only medicine. Further information available from Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Bracknell, Berkshire,RG12 8YS, UK. Tel: +44 (0)1344 746959. Email: [email protected]. Date of preparation: Apr 2010. AHD 6304. Use MedicinesResponsibly (www.noah.co.uk/responsible)
13July 30, 2012 WELFARE EQUINE
uncomfortable and even pain-
ful. At worst, they can provide
a breach in the skin’s defences
through which infection can
enter. However, the incidence
of wound infections is difficult to
quantify, for mules appear to be
resistant to infection. Bacterial
contamination of the wound is
to be expected, but it is difficult
to predict how often it will over-
whelm the animal’s ability to
deal with it (Cousquer, 2011).
It is known that ponies
mount a more effective acute
inflammation during second-
intention wound healing than
horses (Wilmink et al, 1999a;
Wilmink et al, 1999b). It is
likely this is also true of mules,
given their reputed resistance
to disease. The ability to rap-
idly mobilise large numbers of
polymorphonuclear leucocytes
may allow wound infection to
be controlled and the wound to
pass swiftly from the inflamma-
tory to the granulation phase.
Tetanus is often cited as a
serious consequence of teth-
ering injuries (Kay, 2007), but
there has been little work con-
ducted to quantify this risk, rela-
tive to the thousands of mules
with pastern wounds. During
an 18-month period between
2003 and 2004, the Society
for the Protection of Animals
Abroad (SPANA) hospitalised
56 cases of equine tetanus
in Morocco (Kay, 2007). It is
unclear whether this figure
reflects a widespread resistance
to the disease among working
equines in Morocco and, with-
out further research, it is impos-
sible to draw any conclusions.
However, it is probably fair
to say these injuries should be
preventable, and that owners
and employers of pack mules
on expedition have a duty to
ensure the packing equipment
used does not cause injury to
the mules (Cousquer, 2011).
It should be noted that many
of these tethering injuries occur
when equines are first trained to
accept tethering (Brager, 2005).
However, mules are said to
learn more quickly and may be
less susceptible to such injuries
of such injuries in older animals
reflects the fact these injuries are
sustained repeatedly through-
out a mule’s working life.
Developing a viable alternative
M Cotton hobble
Historically, SPANA teams have
distributed cotton hobbles to
owners in an attempt to pro-
mote an atraumatic means of
preventing equines from wan-
dering. However, despite the
distribution of many hundreds
of hobbles, the authors have
yet to see a cotton hobble used
by muleteers in the mountains.
In seeking to develop a pre-
ventive response to tethering
injuries, a number of factors
must be taken into consid-
eration (Table 1). Any solu-
tion proposed must not only
provide an atraumatic means
of ensuring the mule does not
wander off, but must meet the
owner’s criteria for use.
Interviews with muleteers
during the 2009 and 2010
trekking seasons in Morocco
identified a number of key
issues. Muleteers were found
to be unwilling to resort to hob-
bles (Figure 5) on expedition,
as their priority was to prevent
the mule from wandering off.
Cotton hobbles, even when
attached to one foot as part
of a tethering system, were
rejected as insecure and unreli-
able. When trialled, they were
also found to be of inadequate
strength and durability.
In view of the difficulties
experienced trying to persuade
owners to change their long-
held tethering practices, alter-
native systems (Brager, 2005)
were reviewed and a number
of prototypes developed with
local artisans in Marrakech.
The final two models chosen
for trialling had to respect the
key factors detailed in Table 1.
They had to be secure, strong
and durable, and simple to use
and maintain. They also had to
be easy and cheap to manufac-
ture using local materials and
equipment. To avoid potential
over-tightening of the tether, a
system was needed for it to sit
snugly and comfortably in the
space between the coronary
band and fetlock.
Measurements were taken
of the pastern circumference of
13 adult mules (both forelimbs
were measured – yielding 26
measurements) to establish
the range of fetlock dimen-
sions encountered in practice.
These ranged between 16cm
and 20.5cm, with a mean of
17.8cm. The narrowest meas-
urements were recorded in
young mules (aged between
four and five), the largest in
older mules with remodelling
of the underlying first phalanx.
This work resulted in the
production of two models,
which are compared to the
cotton hobble in Table 2.
M Leather bracelet
The first model consisted of
a leather bracelet made from
thick (2mm to 4mm) cow’s
leather. Strips of leather meas-
uring 23cm by 2.5cm were cut
and either end equipped with
a metal eyelet. When closed
around the pastern the eyelets
meet up – allowing the tether-
ing rope to be passed through
and secured with an overhand
knot either side (Figure 6).
This prototype has been
manufactured at a cost of
20MAD (Moroccan Dirham),
approximately £1.42 per unit.
than horses (Guenon, 1999).
The lack of well-designed
atraumatic equipment, together
with inadequate knowledge of
horsemanship (Figure 4) and
animal training, contribute to the
incidence of these injuries, both
in young mules and in older
animals (Cousquer, 2011).
Clearly, the greater severity
TABLE 2. Comparative evaluation of the merits of three different types of hobbling system
Tethering system
Materials Production Local cost Strength and durability
Popularity with muleteers
Strengths (+) and weaknesses (-)
Cotton
hobble
Cotton Local. Requires training
12MAD (Khémisset) 16MAD (Marrakech)
- - Atraumatic (+). Easy to apply (+). Easily undone (-). Insecure (-). Deteriorates rapidly (-). Muleteers reluctant to trial (-).
Leather
bracelet
Cow’s leather and brass eyelets
Local. Requires some equipment for closing eyelets
20MAD + + Atraumatic (+). Muleteers willing to trial (+). Harder to apply as it requires rope to be threaded through eyelet (-). Loose if size does not correspond to fetlock (-). Leather may deform (-). Eyelet may cut through leather (-).
Leather
sheath
Goat’s leather and nylon rope.
Local. Requires needle and thread. Easily made by muleteers.
5-10 MAD +++ +++ Atraumatic (+). Sheath can be supplied at 16cm and rope then cut to fit fetlock (+). Nylon rope takes the load rather than the leather (+). Long lasting (+). Muleteers willing to trial (+).
Figure 6. This prototype leather bracelet is secured around the mule’s pastern. The tethering rope is threaded through the two apposed metal eyelets and secured with an overhand knot on either side. The last overhand knot must be undone to release the mule from the tethering system – this may be difficult if the knot tightens.
continued overleaf
etmedica, Bracknell, Berkshire, -ingelheim.com. Date of preparation: Apr 2010. AHD 6304. Use Medicines www.metacam.co.uk
14 Veterinary Times
trials of the leather sheath are
proposed to evaluate this teth-
ering system further. These
will focus on the will-
ingness of mule-
teers to change
t h e i r h a b i t s
and practices
in favour of a
more humane
tethering system.
AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank
The Donkey Sanctuary and
Stephen Blakeway for their
invaluable support, mentoring
and encouragement. This col-
laborative project would not
have been possible without
their foresight and funding. The
author would also like to thank
Michael Crane and the staff at
SPANA Maroc for their hard
work and support throughout
the past few years. Additional
thanks are due to Above and
Beyond, Cotswold Outdoor
and Brasher for their support
and contributions.
References
Brager E (2005). Techniques du voy-
age à cheval, Nathan, Paris.
Cousquer G O (2011). Manage-
ment of saddle and harness sores in
a pack mule on expedition – a case
study, www.worldwidewounds.com
Farrell R K, Kroger, L M and Win-
ward L D (1966). Freeze branding
for identification, J Am Vet Med Ass
149: 745.
Garrett C (2010). The Good Har-
ness Guide, The Donkey Sanctuary
Sidmouth, Devon.
Guenon A (1999). La grande histoire
du mulet (le mulet intime), Editions
du vieux Crayon, Le Poiré sur Vie,
France, (original work published
1899).
Hadrill D (2002). Horse Healthcare,
A Manual for Animal Health Work-
ers and Owners, ITDG Publishing,
London.
Hanson R R (2005). Management
of burn injuries in the horse, Vet
Clin North Am Equine Pract 21(1):
105-123.
Kay G (2007). How useful is tetanus
antitoxin in the treatment of equidae
with tetanus? A comparison of three
treatment protocols used in the
WELFARE EQUINE
management of 56 cases of equine
tetanus presented to the SPANA
clinics in Morocco in 2003/2004. In
R A Pearson (ed), The Fifth Interna-
tional Colloquium on Working Equines:
The Future for Working Equines, The
Donkey Sanctuary, Sidmouth: 197.
Knottenbelt D C (2003). Handbook
of Equine Wound Management,
Saunders, London.
Knottenbelt D C and McGarry, J W
(2009). Pascoe’s Principles and Prac-
tice of Equine Dermatology, Elsevier
Saunders, Edinburgh.
Pearson R A, Simalenga E and
Krecek R (2003). Harnessing and
Hitching Donkeys, Horses and Mules
for Work, University of Edinburgh.
Sells P D, Pinchbeck G, Mezzane H,
Ibourki J and Crane M (2010). Pack
wounds of donkeys and mules in
the northern High Atlas of Morocco,
Equine Vet J 42(3): 219-226.
SPANA (2002). Guide de SPANA des
soins des Animaux, SPANA, London.
United States Army (2004). Special
forces use of pack animals – field
manual 3-05.213, Headquarters,
Department of the Army, Wash-
ington DC.
Thomsett L R (1991). Pigmentation
and pigmentary disorders of the
equine skin, Equine Vet Educ 3(3):
130-135.
Wilmink J M, Stolk P W, Van
Weeren, P R and Barneveld A
(1999a). Differences in second-
intention wound healing between
horses and ponies: macroscopic
aspects, Equine Vet J: 31(1), 53-60.
Wilmink J M, Van Weeren P R,
Stolk P W, Van Mil F N and Barn-
eveld A (1999b). Differences in
second-intention wound healing
between horses and ponies: histo-
logical aspects, Equine Vet J 31(1):
61-67. n
n DEVELOPING SOLUTIONS TO EXPEDITION PACK MULE TETHERING INJURIES IN THE HIGH ATLAS – from page 13
that can be passed over a loop
of nylon rope and is then placed
around the fetlock (Figure 7).
The cost of the latter is esti-
mated at 5MAD to 10MAD
per unit, based on a purchase
price of 80MAD (£5.79) for
one tanned goat hide, which
can be used to produce 20
sleeves, and the cost of nylon
rope, which is 1.0MAD to
2.5MAD per metre. The bulk
price of goat hides is as low as
2,000MAD (£145) for 50 hides.
The 13 muleteers trialling
these prototypes on expedi-
tion were all of the opinion
the leather sheath was worth
trying, as it retained the strength
and security of the rope. The
rope passing through the sheath
could be adjusted to ensure a
snug fit. Most significantly, the
leather is not required to take
the strain and is not, therefore,
subject to any force that might
shorten its working life. Its role
is purely to protect the underly-
ing tissues from the rope. The
use of a double length of rope
within the sheath increases the
surface area over which any
force is applied.
Given these findings, more
Figure 7 (left and right). A loop of nylon rope is passed through the leather sleeve and knotted. The tethering rope is then passed through this loop and tied to secure the mule. This system of tethering was used throughout the expedition without any problems or objections.
Figure 8. A coil of nylon rope
encased in a leather sheath. The tethering rope can be
slipped through either side of the coil without over tightening.
GLEN COUSQUER qualified from the Royal
(Dick) in 1997 and has spent much of his
career in wildlife, avian and exotic practice.
He completed his certificate in zoological
medicine in 2003 and has since worked in
various capacities in exotic and small animal
emergency practice in France and the UK. He
holds an MSc in outdoor education and is an
ESRC scholar at the University of Edinburgh’s
Moray House School of Education, where he
is undertaking research into values education in the mountain
tourism industry and pack animal welfare on expedition.
HASSAN ALYAKINE graduated from the Institut Agronomique et
Vétérinaire Hassan II in Rabat in 1989. After a period of military
service he undertook clinical training and a PhD in anaesthesia at
the University of Hannover, and undertook further training in
surgery and ophthalmology at the University of Vienna, in 1998.
He returned to Rabat in 2002, becoming associate professor in
the Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, Surgery
and Reproduction, in 2006, and deputy head of department in
2007. Hassan divides his time between teaching and clinical
duties at the institute as well as at SPANA in
Casablanca. His clinical interests are centred
on equine anaesthesia, medicine and
surgery, while his research interests extend to
the genetics of the
“Chien de l’Atlas”, the sloughi and the barb
horse. In addition to teaching veterinary
students, he actively engages in training
programmes for private practitioners and
animal technicians across Morocco.
M Leather sheath
The second model has the
merit of being even simpler and
preserves the natural strength
of the nylon rope. It consists of a
strip of leather measuring 16cm
by 6cm, folded lengthwise and
stitched to form a leather sleeve
● Chews contain Green Lipped Mussel
(with high levels of Omega-3),
Glucosamine, Chondroitin
and Antioxidant.
● Highly palatable chew
with natural flavours
that dogs enjoy.
● Makes feeding over a long
period easier.
● Available in 120 chew
packs in NEW keep
fresh containers.
Enriched with Green Lipped Mussel
The tasty way
to soothe stiff joints
and maintain mobility
Science is improved understanding
EFP.01/01/12
For further information contact:
Alstoe Ltd., The Industrial Park,
Sheriff Hutton, York. UK. YO60 6RZ. UK
Tel: +44 (0)1347 878606 Fax: +44 (0)1347 878333
E-mail: [email protected] www.alstoe.co.uk
®Registered Trade Mark ©Alstoe Ltd. 2012